USPatent applicationPatented

Method and apparatus for reducing coupling between word lines and control gate lines in a flash memory system

Granted 10 Mar 2020 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. · originally Microchip Technology

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Guang Yan Luo, Kai Man Yue, Xiaozhou Qian · Examiner: Hoai V Ho · AU 2827 · TC 2800

Life of the application

19 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method and apparatus are disclosed for reducing the coupling that otherwise can arise between word lines and control gate lines in a flash memory system due to parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance. The flash memory system comprises an array of flash memory cells organized into rows and columns, where each row is coupled to a word line and a control gate line.

Description

6 parts
›PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims priority under 37 CFR Section 1.55 to China Patent Application No. 201810626274.X, filed on Jun. 15, 2018, and titled “Method and Apparatus for Reducing Coupling Between Word Lines and Control Gate Lines in a Flash Memory System,” which is incorporated by reference herein.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus are disclosed for reducing the coupling that otherwise can arise between word lines and control gate lines in a flash memory system due to parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Digital non-volatile memories are well known. For example, FIG. 1 depicts four-gate split-gate flash memory cell 100 comprising source region 101 , drain region 102 (coupled to bit line 24 ), floating gate 103 over a first portion of channel region 104 , word line terminal 105 (typically coupled to a word line) over a second portion of channel region 104 , substrate 108 , control gate 106 (typically coupled to a control gate line) over floating gate 103 , and erase gate 107 (typically coupled to an erase gate line) over the source region 101 . This configuration is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,747,310, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes). Here, all gates are non-floating gates except floating gate 103 , meaning that they are electrically connected or connectable to a voltage source. Programming of memory cell 100 occurs by causing heated electrons to be injected from channel region 104 into floating gate 103 . Erasing of memory cell 100 occurs by causing electrons to tunnel from floating gate 103 to erase gate 107 .

Table No. 1 depicts typical voltage ranges that can be applied to the terminals of memory cell 100 for performing read, erase, and program operations:

FIG. 2A shows prior art flash memory system 200 , which comprises an array of cells 100 arranged in rows and columns. Here, only two rows and seven columns are shown, but it is to be understood that the array can comprise any number of rows and any number of columns. Cells 100 in this example are of the type shown in FIG. 1 , wherein the erase gate is shared or merged among two adjacent rows.

In the top row of cells shown in FIG. 2A , word line 201 connects to each word line terminal 105 of each cell 100 in that row, control gate line 202 connects to each control gate terminal 106 of each cell 100 in that row, and erase gate line 203 connects to each shared erase gate terminal 107 of each cell 100 in that row.

In the second row of cells shown in FIG. 2A , word line 205 connects to each word line terminal 105 of each cell 100 in that row, control gate line 204 connects to each control gate terminal 106 of each cell 100 in that row, and erase gate line 203 connects to each shared erase gate terminal 107 of each cell 100 in that row. Notably, erase gate line 203 connects to erase gate terminal 107 of each cell 100 shared among the top row and the second row.

With reference to FIG. 2B , the close proximity of word lines, control gate lines, and floating gates create parasitic effects. Specifically, parasitic capacitance will exist between adjacent word lines and control gate lines, such as between word line 201 and control gate line 202 and between word line 205 and control gate line 204 , and parasitic capacitance also will exist between word line 201 and the floating gates in each cell 100 in the top row and between word line 205 and the floating gates in each cell 100 in the second row.

The parasitic capacitance can be modeled with: (1) parasitic capacitor 210 located within each cell 100 , with one terminal connected to a word line and one terminal connected to a control gate line, and (2) parasitic capacitor 220 located within each cell 100 , with one terminal connected to a word line and one terminal connected to floating gate 103 within the cell.

The effect of parasitic capacitors 210 is that there is voltage coupling between adjacent word lines and control gate lines that responds to changes in voltage on the word lines and/or control gate lines. The effect of parasitic capacitors 220 is that there is voltage coupling between word lines and floating gates within each cell 100 that responds to changes in voltage on the word lines and/or floating gates.

Parasitic capacitors 210 and 220 will cause word lines and control gate lines to take longer to charge to a certain voltage and longer to discharge. This parasitic capacitance has the unwanted effect of varying the current through each cell 100 during a discharge, which can cause read errors. As a result, the margin of error for read sensing operations is reduced. The problem is exacerbated as the target switching speed of the word line and control gate lines increases.

In addition, each word line and control gate line will have a large parasitic resistance. This resistance is due to the relative small size of the devices and the line width. The parasitic resistance can be modeled with parasitic resistors 230 located between cells 100 in each row.

FIG. 3 provides an example of the negative effect of this parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance. In this example, word line 201 is selected for a read operation and is driven high. The voltage on control gate line 202 increases to V CG +ΔV from V CG due to coupling with word line 201 , and then discharges down to V CG . After word line 201 discharges, control gate 202 discharges to V CG −ΔV and then charges back to V CG .

The additional ΔV on control gate line 202 causes an increase of cell current during the read operation. If the read operation does not provide sufficient time for control gate line 202 to discharge from V CG +ΔV to V CG , then a selected cell that is storing a “0” may be misinterpreted as containing a “1.” To avoid this problem, the switching speed must allow for a discharge period on the order of 10's of nanoseconds. Thus, parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance will result in a less accurate system.

What is needed is a flash memory system that reduces the parasitic capacitance between word lines and control gate lines and between word lines and floating gates in a flash memory system.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus are disclosed for reducing the coupling that otherwise can arise between word lines and control gate lines in a flash memory system due to parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a cross-section of a prior art flash memory cell.

FIG. 2A depicts a portion of an array of prior art flash memory cells.

FIG. 2B depicts the parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance in the array of prior art flash memory cells of FIG. 2A .

FIG. 3 depicts exemplary waveforms showing the effect of parasitic capacitance and parasitic resistance on a control gate line during a read operation.

FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment of a decoupling circuit.

FIG. 5 depicts exemplary waveforms for the system of FIG. 4 .

FIG. 6 depicts another embodiment of a decoupling circuit.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 4 depicts flash memory system 400 . Flash memory system 400 is similar to flash memory system 200 , with the addition of decoupling circuit 410 . Decoupling circuit 410 comprises switches 401 and 402 . During a read operation, a control gate line for a selected row is coupled to a voltage V CG by switch 401 , and a control gate line for unselected rows are coupled to a voltage V CG −ΔV by switch 402 .

The effect of decoupling circuit 410 is depicted in FIG. 5 . In this example, word line 201 is selected for a read operation. Switch 402 initially is closed and then is opened, and when word line 201 is driven high, control gate line 202 is driven from V CG −ΔV to V CG −ΔV+ΔV (which equals V CG ), which is the desired voltage level for a control gate line of a selected row during a read operation. After word line 201 discharges, switch 402 is closed and control gate line 202 will discharge back to V CG −ΔV.

Another embodiment is shown in FIG. 6 . Decoupling circuit 600 (which can be used instead of decoupling circuit 410 ) comprises switches 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , and 606 and inverter 607 . During a read operation involving the row of word line 201 and control gate 202 , word line 201 will be driven high. Switch 602 will remain open. The output of inverter 607 will be low, and switch 601 will close. Switches 604 and 605 also will be closed, such that the voltage V CG is provided to control gate line 202 .

In instances where the row of word line 201 and control gate 202 is not selected, word line 201 will be low. Switch 602 will be closed. The output of inverter 607 will be high, and switch 601 will be open. Switches 604 and 605 also will be closed, such that the voltage V CG −ΔV is provided to control gate line 202 .

During a program operation, switches 603 and 604 will be closed, such that the voltage Vep(HV) will be provided to control gate line 202 .

During an erase operation, switch 606 will be closed, such that control gate line 202 will be pulled to ground.

It should be noted that, as used herein, the terms “over” and “on” both inclusively include “directly on” (no intermediate materials, elements or space disposed therebetween) and “indirectly on” (intermediate materials, elements or space disposed therebetween). Likewise, the term “adjacent” includes “directly adjacent” (no intermediate materials, elements or space disposed therebetween) and “indirectly adjacent” (intermediate materials, elements or space disposed there between), “mounted to” includes “directly mounted to” (no intermediate materials, elements or space disposed there between) and “indirectly mounted to” (intermediate materials, elements or spaced disposed there between), and “electrically coupled” includes “directly electrically coupled to” (no intermediate materials or elements there between that electrically connect the elements together) and “indirectly electrically coupled to” (intermediate materials or elements there between that electrically connect the elements together). For example, forming an element “over a substrate” can include forming the element directly on the substrate with no intermediate materials/elements therebetween, as well as forming the element indirectly on the substrate with one or more intermediate materials/elements there between.

›Tables in the description — 1
TABLE NO. 1 Operation of Flash Memory Cell 100 of FIG. 1
WLBLCGEGSL
Read1.0-2 V0.6-2 V0-2.6 V0-2.6 V0 V
Erase−0.5 V/0 V0 V0 V/−8 V8-12 V0 V
Program1 V1 μA8-11 V4.5-9 V4.5-5 V

Claims as granted

10 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G11C16/26
  • G11C16/04
Section H — Electricity
  • H10B41/41

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2018Oct 2018Jan 2019Apr 2019Jul 2019Oct 2019Jan 2020Apr 2020USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.5 y
558 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Hoai V Ho
art unit 2827 · TC 2800
Citations: 13 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2020202220242026202820302032203420362038Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock