Low noise broadband amplifier with resistive matching
Granted 1 Oct 2019 · 2 office actions
Assignee: MORSE MICRO PTY. LTD.
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Andrew Terry · Examiner: Edward F Urban · AU 2649 · TC 2600
Life of the application
11 dated eventsAbstract
Various circuitry may benefit from appropriate matching. For example, certain low noise broadband amplifiers may benefit from resistive matching.
Description
6 parts›Field
Various circuitry may benefit from appropriate matching. For example, certain low noise broadband amplifiers may benefit from resistive matching.
›Description of the Related Art
A traditional radio frequency (RF) receiver signal chain uses an RF amplifier first. This amplifier is typically a low noise amplifier (LNA). The input impedance is matched to the antenna using inductors.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For proper understanding of the invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 illustrates a circuit diagram of a circuit according to certain embodiments.
FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a differential implementation, according to certain embodiments.
FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a multiple phase implementation, according to certain embodiments.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide a passive mixer and noise cancelling baseband amplifier. The amplifier arrangement of certain embodiments may provide a reduced area and higher linearity compared with previous approaches.
Certain embodiments of an amplifier may be used in a variety of applications. For example, the amplifier according to certain embodiments may be used in RF receiver signal chains, but also may be used in other implementations, such as in sensor amplifiers, such as microphones, accelerometers, and the like.
FIG. 1 illustrates a circuit diagram of a circuit according to certain embodiments. The diagram of FIG. 1 provides an example of one implementation of certain embodiments, but as will be discussed below, other implementations are also possible.
As can be seen in FIG. 1 , a resistor R 1 can be provided between the circuit input, labelled as node a, and a baseband amplifier A 1 . The baseband amplifier A 1 can be configured to receive current input and provide current output. This amplifier can have a low impedance input. The gain of this amplifier can be defined by the ratio of the resistors R 2 and R 3 , such that Gain=−R 2 /R 3 .
In parallel with the series connection of resistor R 1 and baseband amplifier A 1 , the circuit can also include a voltage to current amplifier A 2 with high input impedance. The gain of this amplifier may be −G 2 .
The circuit can also include a summing transimpedance amplifier A 3 . This amplifier can sum currents i 1 , which is the current from amplifier A 1 , and i 2 , which is the current from amplifier A 2 . The input port can be modelled as a source having a source voltage Vsrc and a source resistance Rsrc, which can provide a voltage V a at node a.
In operation, this circuit can process input signals from the input port and provide a corresponding amplified signal at the output port. More particularly, a voltage signal on node a can result in current i 1 at the output of amplifier A 1 . The value of this current may be as follows:
The same voltage signal V a can also result in a current i 2 at the output of amplifier 2 . The value of this current may be as follows:
i 2 =−G 2× V a
Thus, for voltage signal V a , the sum of the output currents currents i 1 and i 2 can be as follows:
When
Then the sum can be simplified as follows:
Nevertheless, as noted in FIG. 1 , there may be some noise current i nr1 from resistor R 1 . The noise current i nr1 from resistor R 1 can result in a contribution to output current i 1 , as follows:
That same noise current, i nr1 , can generate a noise voltage Vna on node a, as follows:
Vna=R 1×(− i nr1 )
This noise voltage Vna can result in a contribution to output current i 2 , as follows:
i 2 =−G 2× R 1×(− i nr1 )
The sum of these contributions to output currents i 1 and i 2 is as follows:
When
Then the sum can be simplified as follows:
i 1 +i 2 =(− R 1× G 2× i nr1 )+(− G 2× R 1×(− i nr1 ))
i 1 i 2 =i nr1 (− R 1× G 2)+ i nr1 ( G 2×+ R 1)
i 1 +i 2 =−i nr1 ( G 2× R 1)+ i nr1 ( G 2×+ R 1)
i 1 +i 2 =0
Thus, in the case where the ratio of resistors R 2 and R 3 is selected to be equal to the product of R 1 and gain G 2 , then the signal path gain from Va is twice that of G 2 , while the noise gain from R 1 is 0.
The impedance seen looking into node a can be determined by resistor R 1 . Thus, with appropriate selection of resistor values, the circuit can prevent the noise from this resistor from appearing at the circuit's output.
There can be various modifications to the above embodiments. For example, as shown FIG. 1 , there can be a plurality of distinct paths connecting the input port to the output port. The plurality of distinct paths can include a first path and a second path. A first amplifier, namely amplifier A 1 , can be on the first path and a second amplifier, namely amplifier A 2 , can be on the second path.
The first path can include a plurality of series connected operational amplifiers. This could be a modification to the circuit shown in FIG. 1 . For example, in addition to amplifier A 1 there could be additional amplifiers connected in series to A 1 , optionally between amplifier A 1 and the summing amplifier, A 3 .
The second path can also include a plurality of series connected operational amplifiers. This could be a modification to the circuit shown in FIG. 1 . For example, in addition to amplifier A 2 there could be additional amplifiers connected in series to A 2 , optionally between amplifier A 2 and the summing amplifier, A 3 .
The second path can also include a plurality of parallel connected operational amplifiers. This could be a modification to the circuit shown in FIG. 1 . For example, in addition to amplifier A 2 there could be additional amplifiers connected in parallel to A 2 , between node a and the summing amplifier, A 3 .
The above modifications can be applied in combination with one another. For example, the first path can include multiple series-connected operational amplifiers and the second path can include multiple series-connected operational amplifiers and multiple parallel-connected operational amplifiers.
Both single-ended and differential implementations are possible. FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a single-ended implementation. FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a differential implementation, according to certain embodiments. FIG. 2 shows how an input port can include a differential line instead of a single-ended approach with a ground.
Both single-phase and multiple phase implementations are possible. FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a single-phase implementation. FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a multiple phase implementation, according to certain embodiments. As shown in FIG. 3 , the circuit can included multiple phases. FIG. 3 illustrates two phases, but other numbers of phases are also possible. FIG. 3 illustrates that each of the phases can be selectively switched out. Alternatively, each phase could be provided with a single-phase implementation.
In certain embodiments, capacitors can be used to create frequency dependent transfer functions.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2
FIG. 1 shows a summing circuit that it is a summing amplifier. There are other possible summing circuits, such as an input stage of an analog to digital converter (ADC) circuit. Likewise, while FIG. 1 illustrates amplifiers A 1 and A 2 as operational amplifiers (op-amps), other kinds of amplifiers are also permitted.
Certain embodiments can be used for an RF receiver, where a passive mixer is placed in front of the amplifier. The baseband amplifier's input impedance is used for RF impedance matching on the RF side of the passive mixer.
One having ordinary skill in the art will readily understand that the invention as discussed above may be practiced with steps in a different order, and/or with hardware elements in configurations which are different than those which are disclosed. Therefore, although the invention has been described based upon these preferred embodiments, it would be apparent to those of skill in the art that certain modifications, variations, and alternative constructions would be apparent, while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention.
›Tables in the description — 3
| i | 1 |
| = | |
| - | R |
| | |
| | 2 |
| R | |
| | 3 |
| × | |
| V | a |
| R | |
| | 1 |
| i | 1 | |
| + | ||
| i | 2 | |
| = | ||
| ( | ||
| - | R | |
| | ||
| | 2 | |
| R | | |
| | 3 | |
| × | ||
| V | a | |
| R | | |
| | 1 | |
| ) | ||
| + | ||
| ( | ||
| - | G | |
| | ||
| | 2 | × |
| V | a | |
| ) |
| i | 1 |
| = | |
| - | R |
| | |
| | 2 |
| R | |
| | 3 |
| × | |
| i | |
| nr | |
| | 1 |
Claims as granted
2 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
4 codes- H03F1/26
- H04B1/18
- H03G3/00
- H04B1/12
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock