USPatent applicationPatented

Reset before write architecture and method

Granted 15 Dec 2020 · 2 office actions

Assignee: Synopsys

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Prashant Dubey, Kritika Aditya, Jamil Kawa · Examiner: Jay W. Radke · AU 2827 · TC 2800

Application· this page
15/897,120
filed 14 Feb 2018
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 10,867,665
granted 15 Dec 2020

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An SRAM bit-cell with independent write and read ports and an architecture utilizing a feedback loop from the read port to the write port of half-selected bit-cells. This guarantees absolute data retention of all SRAM bit-cells not fully selected for write operation across a wide range of supply voltage spanning from the nominal voltage of a process to a sub-threshold range.

Description

6 parts
›RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/460,085, filed on Feb. 16, 2017 and incorporates that application by reference in its entirety.

›FIELD

The present invention relates to static random access memory (SRAM) and more particularly to extending low voltage operation range in SRAM.

›BACKGROUND

Low voltage operation is a challenge for SRAMs from three perspectives: write ability, stability during read, and stability during extended un-exercised periods (retention). All these aspects of SRAM operation are primarily related to the constitution of the bit-cell. The most common SRAM bit-cell is the six-transistor (6T) bit-cell. An exemplary SRAM bit-cell is shown in FIG. 1 . Other variations on the 6T bit-cell in the form of added transistors (8T, 10T) can be used to achieve better write-ability and better stability especially at lower than nominal supply voltages.

In the classical 6T bit-cell shown in FIG. 1 , the NMOS pass-gate 110 must overcome the pull-up of storage node 170 by PMOS 130 in order to write “O” on the true side (left side node of the latch of FIG. 1 ) thus writing a “O” value in the bit-cell. Conversely, the NMOS pass-gate 120 must overcome the pull-up of storage node 180 by PMOS 150 in order to write a “O” in the other side (right side latch node of FIG. 1 ) to write a stored value of “1” in the cell (a value of “1” stored on storage node 170 ).

The problem of achieving SRAM cell write-ability is harder at lower supply voltages due to variability in the write pass-gate current strength and the write current's strong dependence on the pass transistor's gate overdrive (gate voltage level in excess of the gate voltage threshold) for power supply values near threshold.

Typically better SRAM cell write-ability is achieved at the expense of lower stability, as the ease of writing translates to the ease of unintended cell-content flipping due to disturbance. Thus if the write-ability is improved the stability is degraded.

This is especially true in the case in bit-interleaved architectures where the row being selected for write operation has unselected column bit-cells on which the pass-gates are open (turned on) and therefore the impacted bit-cells internal nodes are connected to their corresponding bit-lines. Such bit-cells are referred to as half-selected bit-cells.

Solutions exist in the literature on ways to improve the stability of the half-selected bit-cells. However; it is quite difficult to achieve good write-ability of a bit-cell and stability of the same bit-cell when the cell is in a half-selected mode.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings. The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals indicate like components, and:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional 6T bit-cell SRAM.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a proposed bit-cell incorporating a separate read port.

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of one embodiment of the bit-cell shown in FIG. 2 .

FIG. 4 is one embodiment of a bit-interleaved architecture in a typical memory arrangement where read bit-line is not connected to write bit-line.

FIG. 5 is one embodiment of a bit-interleaved architecture with read and write bit-lines connected through a feedback loop.

FIG. 6 is the timing diagram for one embodiment of the control generation on the word-lines and select lines to implement, reset before write, write and the read operation.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a state machine for a write request.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The present application discusses an SRAM bit-cell and an architecture that guarantees 100% write-ability. The architecture utilizes a feedback mechanism from the bit-cell's separate read port to a corresponding write bit-line, ensuring that a half-selected bit-cell has stability of its stored data by having the original stored data written back through its write bit-line. Once the half-selected bit-cell's write bit-line has the same value as the data stored in the half-selected bit-cell, if a write word-line is switched “ON,” data on a selected bit-line is written to a selected bit cell (through corresponding pass-gates) while the half-selected bit-cell has the same content as the original stored data written to it from its write bit-line. Thus, no write of new data happens on half-selected bit-cells. Therefore 100% stability is achieved.

FIG. 1 is a classical 6-transistor bit-cell. The storage node 170 is the standard node whose data content defines the SRAM bit-cell content. A “O” is written into the cell by setting the bit-line 105 to “O” and the bit-line-bar 101 to “1” and enabling the word-line WL simultaneously connected to pass gates 110 and 120 . For a write “1” operation, the polarity of the data on 105 and 101 are reversed such that “1” is written to storage node 170 and a “0” is written to storage node 180 . For a read operation, the bit-line 105 is pre-charged to a “1” and the pass gate 110 is enabled. If a “1” is stored in the cell then the voltage level on 105 is unchanged. If a “0” is stored then a voltage drop on 105 is sensed signaling a “0” cell content. The classical 6-bit transistor cell also contains NMOS 140 and NMOS 160 .

FIG. 2 is a logic gate level representation of one embodiment of the proposed bit-cell and FIG. 3 is a transistor level implementation of the same bit-cell. 205 is the write bit-line, 210 is the read bit-line, and 241 is the memory bit-cell storage portion in area 240 . Read buffer 250 has buffer 251 and input line 255 and allows an independent read operation, and write buffer 270 , which has buffers 220 and 230 and lines 225 and 235 , allows the independent write operation.

As can be seen in FIG. 3 , the circuit diagram includes inverter 330 (which includes transistors N 330 and P 330 ) and inverter 340 (which includes transistors N 340 and P 340 ) that make up the bit-cell storage portion 390 . a write buffer 380 , and a read buffer 385 . The output of inverter 340 is connected to the input of inverter 330 . Write buffer 380 contains gate 305 (which includes transistors N 305 and P 305 ) with inputs 315 and ˜ 315 , and gate 310 (which includes transistors N 310 and P 310 ) with inputs ˜ 315 and 315 . Read buffer 385 contains inverter 350 (which includes transistors N 350 and P 350 ) with connections to VDDP and VSSP and gate 360 (which includes transistors N 360 and P 360 ) with inputs 365 and ˜ 365 . The output of write buffer 380 is input to inverter 340 . The output of inverter 330 is input to inverter 340 , to gate 310 , and to input of inverter 350 .

FIG. 4 shows one embodiment of a bit-interleaved memory architecture with a read port and a write port. In this structure, the bit-cells 10 and 11 are connected to the write word-line 40 and read word-line 42 . Bit-cells 20 to 21 are connected to the local write word-line 41 and the local read word-line 43 . Local write bit-line 30 and the local read bit-line 32 constitute one bit-line column and the write bit-line 31 and read bit-line 33 constitute another bit-line column.

Before a write operation to a selected bit-cell is performed, the data on the write bit-line of half-selected bit-cells must be same as the data stored in the storage nodes of those half-selected bit-cells (the node of half-selected bit-cell in FIG. 4 ). This ensures complete stability of the half-selected bit-cells.

Using FIG. 3 to further illustrate this, in one embodiment, the read port 304 can be used to reset the write-bit-line 302 before a write operation to the level of the node 335 of cell 11 , which is the same level on read bit-line 33 after read word-line has been enabled ON, through an external buffer path.

This is achieved by activating the read buffer 385 by switching the read word-line 365 ON. This resets the voltage level of the bit-line 304 . Bit-line 304 is coupled to the write bit-line 302 , during the initial phase of the write operation. This may be done through connecting the read bit-line 304 to an external read buffer to connect the same to the write bit-line 302 .

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 a write operation to be performed on bit-cell 10 leaves bit-cell 11 on the same row as half-selected. Write is enabled by activating the write word-line 40 . Bit-cells 20 and 21 are the un-selected bit-cells as the corresponding row select word-lines ( 41 , 42 , 43 etc.) are inactive.

To ensure the stability of bit-cell 11 , which is exposed to the voltage level of write bit-line 31 , a reset before write is performed.

This is done by first reading the data O 11 from bit-cell 11 and resetting write bit-line 31 with the same value, before activating write word-line 40 .

This is illustrated in one embodiment shown in FIG. 5 , where the write bit-lines ( 30 , 31 etc.) are connected through switches ( 50 , 51 ) to read bit-lines ( 32 , 33 ) respectively.

The control timing for the circuit of FIG. 5 is shown in FIG. 6 . In this embodiment, the read word-line 42 is selected before switching the write word-line 40 . This resets the bit-lines 30 and 31 to the levels of the storage nodes of the bit-cells 10 and 11 , O 10 and O 11 respectively.

Once the read word-line 42 is active, the read port of the bit-cells 10 and 11 will write their data on the local read bit-lines 32 and 33 respectively.

In one embodiment, read bit-lines 32 and 33 are connected to the read buffers 52 and 53 respectively. The read buffers 52 and 53 in turn are connected to write bit-lines 30 and 31 respectively once the activation signals 60 and 61 are enabled.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

In one embodiment, the read buffers 52 and 53 are always active by keeping the signals 60 and 61 high (inverted versions of signal 80 and 81 ) and connected to the write bit-line 30 and 31 . Signals 60 and 61 control switches 50 and 51 , respectively, while signals 80 and 81 control the switches 70 and 71 respectively. This ensures that whatever data values are sensed by the read buffers 52 and 53 are transferred to the bit-lines 30 and 31 . Signals 82 and 83 control the switches 72 and 73 respectively. Buffer 92 is input to switches 70 and 71 via line 90 . Buffer 93 receives input from switches 72 and 73 via line 91 .

In one embodiment, the read buffer stays active only for the un-selected local bit-line columns. This is achieved in the preferred embodiment by making the signal 60 and 80 complementary to each other since write will only happen when the reset has finished.

In the control timing illustrated in FIG. 6 , it is assumed that the write operation is activated at negative edge of an external clock (memory clock). The read operation is enabled by the WEN (write enable) signal. If the external clock positive edge of the WEN signal goes high, a read operation happens after the clock goes high.

Because the data in the half-selected bit cell is secured by the buffer 53 , the voltage level for reads and writes can be reduced without reducing write-ability. This enables low voltage operation in SRAM. It also extends useful life, because data remains stable over a larger range of signals.

In one embodiment, the system utilizes a state machine that generates the write and read word-line timing sequences. FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of the state machine for a write request. The process starts at the idle state 710 , when there is data in at least two cells. A write request is received, and this moves the state to a reset state 720 for write-preparation. While in the reset state 720 , the half-selected nodes associated with the write request are selected, and read to a buffer 725 .

Once the half-selected nodes are secured 730 , the state machine moves to the write state 740 . The write operation is completed 745 , in the standard manner. Once the write is completed, 750 , the state machine moves to the restore state 760 . In the restore state 760 the system restores data to the half-selected bit cells from the buffer 765 . In this way, the half-selected bit cell data is maintained securely.

In the preferred embodiment, during the read operation the read bit-lines are not connected to the write bit-lines and so the reset doesn't happen, since such a reset is not needed as the read ports are separate.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G11C11/412
  • G11C11/413
  • G11C7/22
  • G11C11/419

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.8 y
1,035 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Interviews
2
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Jay W. Radke
art unit 2827 · TC 2800
Citations: 13 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom202220242026202820302032203420362038Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock