USPatent applicationPatented

Whole body non-contact electrical stimulation device with variable parameters

Granted 4 Feb 2020 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Neva Electromagnetics, LLC · originally NEVA ELECTROMAGNETICS, LLC

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Viktor S Makarov, Sergey N Makarov, Gregory M Noetscher, Zhi-De Deng · Examiner: Christopher P McAndrew · AU 2858 · TC 2800

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The present invention relates to an electromagnetic device for non-contact injection of strong modulated (0-1000 Hz) electric fields with intensity of 1-2 volts per centimeter into a whole human body at the frequency band 100-500 kHz. The device of the present invention is a low-pass birdcage coil resonator with a very large number of rungs, with two inductively coupled loop feeds, and with a high quality factor of 300.

Description

6 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 62/444,940, filed Jan. 11, 2017. The subject matter if that application is hereby included in its entirety.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an electromagnetic device for non-contact injection of strong modulated electric fields into a whole human body at the frequency band 100-500 kHz.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The conventional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) RF (Radio Frequency) coil or a birdcage resonator known from MRI instrumentation cannot be used in the frequency band 100-500 kHz since its quality factor Q, the “gain” of the resonator, becomes very low (less than one). As a result, the induced electric field in a body will be low too. To achieve high levels of the stimulation electric field, a birdcage coil resonator operating at a much lower carrier frequency of around 100-500 kHz is required. The carrier may then amplitude-modulated by any required base frequency in the range of 0-1000 Hz or by constructing pulsed excitation with a center frequency not to exceed 1000 Hz.

Accordingly, a resonator with a high field, up to 1-2 volts per centimeter, that operates at much lower than frequencies is required. The birdcage resonator of the present invention uses a very large number of rungs in excess of 100 while the conventional MRI resonator uses 8-16 rungs. It also uses inductively coupled feeds. These two factors allow achievement of a very high quality factor of 300 and high-fields of 1-2 volts per centimeter. Such a device may be used to modulate the field level with any signal including electroencephalographic signals from the brain to establish closed-loop feedback for the entire peripheral and/or nervous system. Other potential applications include treatment of chronic pain, oncological and psychiatric applications.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a resonant non-contact device, wherein the device creates strong variable electric fields in the human body in the frequency band 100-500 kHz. The device of the present invention comprises a modified birdcage coil or birdcage resonator. The generally cylindrical birdcage coil is further comprised of a pair of end rings, a plurality of generally parallel rungs or column elements bridging the end rings, a plurality of matching capacitors, and two inductively coupled loop feeds connected to a source with a 90 degrees phase shift.

In a preferred embodiment, the end rings are disposed in parallel planes along the coil axis and the parallel rungs interconnect the end rings. The end rings may be detachable to the parallel rungs. The plurality of parallel rungs are spaced generally equally about the end rings. In a preferred embodiment, the parallel rungs are comprised of a conductive material, preferably copper, and preferably thin-walled copper tubing.

In a further embodiment, each parallel rung is comprised of two rung portions with a capacitor located at the attachment point of the two rung portions. The capacitors are located distal to the end rings and, preferably, equidistant to each end ring. The capacitors are, preferably matching and in the nanofarad range used to tune the resonator to the desired frequency.

In a preferred embodiment, two inductively coupled loop feeds are disposed outside the parallel rungs proximally to the coil center. Each loop feed is shifted 90 degrees about the coil axis.

In a further embodiment, the birdcage coil of the present invention is driven through two inductively coupled feeds in quadrature by an amplifier, preferably a 3 kilowatt power amplifier.

In a further embodiment, the power amplifier includes amplitude modulation in the frequency band 0-1000 Hz.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 a is a schematic representation of a birdcage resonator of the present invention.

FIG. 1 b is a schematic representation of a birdcage coil of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 a shows a birdcage resonator 1 of the present invention. The resonator comprises end rings 5 , capacitors 4 , parallel rungs 3 , and inductive loop feeds 2 . The end rings 5 are disposed along parallel planes and are interconnected by the parallel rungs 3 . Each parallel rung 3 is comprised of at least two leg portions 6 . Capacitors 4 connect the rung portions 6 to form a parallel rung 3 . Inductively coupled loop feeds 2 are placed parallel to rungs 3 .

FIG. 1 b shows the birdcage resonator 1 supported by plastic frame 7 . FIG. 1 b further shows that each parallel rung 3 is comprised of at least two leg portions 6 .

Claims as granted

5 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

1 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01R33/34

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018Oct 2018Jan 2019Apr 2019Jul 2019Oct 2019Jan 2020Apr 2020USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.1 y
754 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Christopher P McAndrew
art unit 2858 · TC 2800
Citations: 29 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

No assignments have been recorded for this application yet.