USPatent applicationPatented

Biasing current regularization loop stabilization

Granted 23 Jul 2019 · 1 office action

Assignee: STMicroelectronics

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Danika Perrin, Serge Ramet, Cedric Rechatin, Sandrine Nicolas · Examiner: Anh Q Tra · AU 2842 · TC 2800

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An integrated circuit includes a first stage configured to receive a bias current. A current regulation loop includes a transimpedance amplifier having a first transistor, and a second transistor having a gate coupled to a gate of the first transistor. The first transistor and the second transistor are configured to compare the bias current with a reference current, and to generate a regulation voltage on an output node of the transimpedance amplifier. A capacitor is coupled between the output node of the transimpedance amplifier and the gates of the first and second transistors.

Description

7 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1751294, filed on Feb. 17, 2017, which application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

›TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the invention relate generally to integrated circuits and, in particular embodiments, to biasing current regularization.

›BACKGROUND

Some integrated circuit devices need a constant bias current, for example, in order to place a component under conditions that are advantageous for the operation thereof.

One conventional solution for setting a bias current consists in using a current mirror. However, in some applications, for example, when gate lengths must be kept to a minimum, it is not possible to use this type of mirror due to problems matching the components of the circuit.

Moreover, the bias current must be regulated. That is to say, for example, controlled by negative feedback in order to prevent variations in its value stemming from external causes and in order to ensure a precise bias current.

Bias current regulation loops BCL 0 , as shown, for example, by FIGS. 1 and 2 , enabling a regulated current to be passed through the device have, therefore, been produced.

In FIG. 1 , the regulation loop BCL 0 , which regulates the bias current IDC flowing through a stage to be regulated REG 0 , includes a transimpedance amplifier AMP 0 configured to compare the bias current IDC with a reference current Iref.

It will be recalled here that a transimpedance amplifier makes it possible, in a standard and known manner, to generate on its output a voltage signal from a current signal (for example a current variation or differential) at its input.

The amplifier AMP 0 generates a regulation voltage on an output node A 0 . Such regulation voltage controls the conduction of a transistor T 1 channelling the bias current IDC across its conduction terminals.

FIG. 2 shows the integrated circuit CI from FIG. 1 , and details an example of a transimpedance amplifier AMP 0 .

The amplifier AMP 0 includes two transistors T 2 , T 3 , which are P-MOS transistors in this example, connected into a differential pair, which make it possible to compare the bias current IDC with the reference current Iref.

The ratio of the resistances of the resistors R 2 and R 3 makes it possible to compare values of the bias current IDC and of the reference current Iref in accordance with the same ratio.

The reference current Iref is transmitted to the drains of the transistors T 2 and T 3 by a current mirror MIR including three transistors T 4 , T 5 , T 6 , which are N-MOS transistors in this example. The transistor T 6 is diode-connected, and the two transistors T 4 and T 5 pass a copy of the reference current Iref to each of the two transistors T 2 and T 3 , respectively.

A regulation loop BCL 0 of this kind, the implementation of which can be likened to control of the current by negative feedback, generally requires its operation to be stabilized in order to prevent detrimental resonance effects in particular.

The phase margin reflects the stability of a system, and is equal to the difference between a phase shifted by 180° and the phase of the system at the zero-gain frequency. One conventional criterion for stability is a phase margin of greater than 45°.

The conventional solution consists in providing a stabilizing capacitor C 0 connected between the output node A 0 and a ground terminal GND. With R A0 being the equivalent impedance on the output node A 0 , the capacitor C 0 introduces a cut-off frequency at ½πR A0 C 0 .

In a system including a regulation loop, instability is linked to the position of the unity-gain frequency (set by the dominant pole ½πR A0 C 0 ) with respect to the secondary poles. When the secondary poles are set, increasing C 0 makes it possible to decrease the unity-gain frequency and thus to increase the phase margin.

With this kind of assembly, the value of the capacitor C 0 may be very high.

By way of illustration, the size of such a capacitor C 0 on its own may be greater than the area taken up by the entire remainder of the circuit shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 . Furthermore, a large capacitance in a radiofrequency amplifier may also have an antenna effect that is detrimental to the correct operation of the latter.

Another way of stabilizing the regulation loop BCL 0 may consist in decreasing the transconductance of the transistor T 2 , this moreover introducing a loss of precision, which is likewise undesirable.

Moreover, a capacitor coupled, for example, between the gate and the drain of the transistor T 1 introduces a Miller effect that makes it possible to stabilize the regulation of the current in a more compact manner.

That being said, although the Miller effect makes it possible to ensure good current regulation loop stability, in particular, due to the effect of pole splitting, it introduces constraints that are incompatible with the use of the transistor T 1 as a radiofrequency amplifier, since it limits the bandwidth of the transistor T 1 .

Therefore, there is a need to stabilize a current regulation loop without impairing its performance while not limiting the bandwidth of the stage to be regulated and in a way that minimizes the area taken up in the integrated circuit.

›SUMMARY

Embodiments of the invention relate generally to integrated circuits and, in particular embodiments, to current regulation loops. More specifically, embodiments of the invention relate to regulation of static currents (e.g. currents having a constant level) such as amplifier bias currents.

According to one aspect, an integrated circuit comprises a stage to be regulated through which a current, such as a static current, for example an amplifier bias current, is able to flow, and a current regulation loop. The regulation loop comprises a transimpedance amplifier including a common gate first transistor and second transistor that are configured to compare the current passing through the stage to be regulated with a reference current and to generate a regulation voltage on an output node of the transimpedance amplifier. The integrated circuit furthermore comprises a capacitor coupled between the output node and the gates of the first and second transistors.

The capacitor coupled between the output node and the gates of the first and second transistors, which capacitor is advantageously a stabilizing capacitor, makes it possible to implement stabilization of the current regulation loop in accordance with an advantageous band-pass capacitance multiplication effect.

This effect has the advantage of amplifying the capacitance of the capacitor, and makes it possible to minimize the size of this capacitor. For example, this effect makes it possible to reduce the size of a capacitor C 0 of the kind described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 by more than 90%, for a better result.

Thus, the capacitance of the capacitor is advantageously less than 5 picofarads.

The band-pass capacitance multiplication effect makes it possible to choose the frequencies for which the stabilization is implemented, in order not to impair the performance of the stage to be regulated.

The current regulation loop may, therefore, be configured to have a bandwidth that is lower by at least a factor of ten than the working frequency of the stage to be regulated.

For example, the current regulation loop is configured to regulate the static current with a cut-off at several tens of megahertz, i.e., a frequency that is far from the operating frequency, which is greater than 1 gigahertz, of the stage to be regulated.

The stabilization of the regulation according to this aspect makes it possible to decrease the size of integrated circuits intended in particular for radiofrequency communications, and in accordance with optimum operation.

The stage to be regulated may, therefore, include a radiofrequency amplifier having a working frequency of greater than 1 gigahertz.

For example, the radiofrequency amplifier is a low-noise amplifier including an amplification transistor, the gate of which is connected to the output node of the transimpedance amplifier by a resistor.

In another example, the radiofrequency amplifier is an NMOS-PMOS dual amplifier including two amplification transistors, the gate of one of the amplification transistors being connected to the output node of the transimpedance amplifier by a resistor.

For example, in the current regulation loop, the gates of the first and second transistors are connected to the drain of the second transistor, the two transistors being configured to pass the reference current, and the output node of the transimpedance amplifier is connected to the drain of the first transistor.

Moreover, the transimpedance amplifier may include a reference current source, and a current mirror configured to pass copies of the reference current to the drains of the first and second transistors, respectively.

The current regulation loop may include a first resistor and a second resistor that are connected between a terminal configured to receive a supply voltage and the source of the first transistor and the source of the second transistor, respectively.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other advantages and features of the invention will become apparent upon examination of the detailed description of non-limiting embodiments and of the appended drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1 and 2 , described above, show an integrated circuit including a current regulation loop stabilized using conventional means;

FIGS. 3 and 5 show advantageous exemplary embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a plot showing a band-pass capacitance multiplication effect according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.

Below, the resistances of the resistors and the capacitances of the capacitors of a circuit will be referenced indiscriminately using the same reference (e.g. R or C).

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

FIG. 3 shows an example of an integrated circuit CI including a stage to be regulated REG 1 , as well as a regulation loop BCL 1 that is advantageously stabilized.

In this example, the stage to be regulated REG 1 includes a low-noise amplifier LNA, configured to amplify radiofrequency signals having frequencies of greater than 1 gigahertz, for example.

The amplifier LNA includes an amplification transistor T 1 , an input terminal RFin coupled to the gate of the amplification transistor T 1 by a capacitor C 1 , and an output terminal RFout coupled to the drain of the amplification transistor T 1 .

The source of the amplification transistor T 1 is connected to a ground terminal GND.

Although not shown in FIG. 3 , a cascode transistor for input-output isolation could be connected in series between the amplification transistor T 1 and the output terminal, while being controlled by a cascode reference voltage on its gate.

A capacitor C 1 and a resistor R 1 form a filter that isolates the input terminal RFin from potential signals having frequencies of lower than 1 gigahertz in this example.

A resonator loading the transistor T 1 comprises an inductive load L 2 connected in series with a capacitor C 2 , which capacitor itself is in parallel with a resistor R 2 , between the drain of the amplification transistor T 1 and a terminal configured to receive a supply voltage VDD.

The inductive load L 2 makes it possible to increase the output dynamic range of the low-noise amplifier LNA and the capacitor C 2 makes it possible to prevent a drop in the quality factor of the resonator loading the transistor T 1 .

A low-noise amplifier LNA assembly of this kind requires a bias current IDC to flow through the conduction terminals of the transistor T 1 in order for the amplification transistor T 1 to be placed in a linear regime that is optimal with regard to amplification.

The constant (or low-frequency) component of the voltage present on the gate of the amplification transistor T 1 makes it possible to control this flow of bias current IDC.

The bias current regulation loop BCL 1 makes it possible to control the value of the constant component of the gate voltage of the transistor T 1 , or in other words the regulation voltage.

The regulation loop BCL 1 includes a transimpedance amplifier AMP 1 , including an advantageous stabilizing means.

The transimpedance amplifier AMP 1 includes a current mirror MIR comprising a diode-connected NMOS transistor T 6 , the gate voltage of which controls two copy NMOS transistors T 4 , T 5 .

The current mirror MIR is configured to pass copies of a reference current IREF generated by a current source to the drain of a first PMOS transistor T 2 and the drain of a second PMOS transistor T 3 , respectively.

The first transistor T 2 and the second transistor T 3 are common gate transistors, the gate being connected to the drain of the second transistor T 3 .

A resistor R 2 is connected on the one hand to the source of the first transistor T 2 and on the other hand to a supply voltage terminal VDD, and, likewise, a resistor R 3 is connected on the one hand to the source of the second transistor T 3 and on the other hand to the supply terminal VDD.

This configuration makes it possible to compare the currents flowing through the sources of each of the first and second transistors, in accordance with a comparison factor equal to the ratio between the resistances of the resistors R 2 and R 3 .

Moreover, various size ratios between the transistors of the current mirror MIR and the common gate transistors T 2 , T 3 also make it possible to dimension the comparison factor of the currents.

For the sake of simplification, it will hereinafter be considered that the comparison factor is equal to one.

An output node A of the transimpedance amplifier is connected to the drain of the first transistor T 2 .

A regulation voltage reflecting a difference between the current flowing through the first transistor T 2 and the reference current IREF is delivered to the output node A, the gate of the amplification transistor T 1 being connected to the latter by means of a resistor R 1 termed the isolation resistor.

The regulation voltage present on the output node A consequently controls the transistor T 1 into a more or less conductive state, and regulates the magnitude of the bias current IDC until an equilibrium is reached.

Equilibrium is reached when the current IDC satisfies the equation: R 2 *(I T2 +IDC)=R 3 *I T3 , with I T2 the current flowing through the first transistor T 2 and I T3 the current flowing through the second transistor T 3 .

The PMOS transistors T 2 , T 3 and NMOS transistors T 4 , T 5 , T 6 of the regulation loop BCL 1 are dimensioned in such a way as to obtain good matching of the currents and sufficient gain in the transimpedance amplifier AMP 1 .

Furthermore, a capacitor C is coupled on the one hand to the drain of the first transistor T 2 and on the other hand to the gates of the first and of the second transistors T 2 , T 3 . This capacitor C makes it possible to stabilize the regulation implemented by the loop BCL 1 .

FIG. 4 shows a Bode plot describing the transfer function of an open loop BLE on the gate of the transistor T 1 and comprising the transistor T 1 , the inductive load L 2 , the transistor T 2 and the resistor R 1 , in the configuration described with reference to FIG. 3 and in a conventional configuration of the kind described with reference to FIG. 2 .

The curves G 1 and P 1 respectively represent the gain and the phase of the frequency response of an open loop equivalent to the loop BLE for a configuration of the kind described with reference to FIG. 2 , in particular including a capacitor C 0 coupled between the output node A and a ground terminal GND.

The curves G 2 and P 2 respectively represent the gain and the phase of the frequency response of the loop BLE in the configuration described with reference to FIG. 3 , including a capacitor C coupled between the drain of the transistor T 2 and the gates of transistors T 2 and T 3 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

At low frequencies, for example, frequencies lower than 20 kHz, the transistor T 2 acts as a transconductance amplifier and participates in the open-loop gain G REG .

The gain G REG may be expressed by G REG =gm T1 *gm T2 *R 2 *R A , with gm T1 the transconductance of the transistor T 1 , gm T2 the transconductance of the transistor T 2 , and R A the equivalent impedance on the output node A.

It can furthermore be seen from the gain curves G 1 , G 2 that the capacitor C, coupled between the drain of the transistor T 2 and the common gate of transistors T 2 and T 3 , introduces two effects in particular.

A first effect is a decrease in a first cut-off frequency.

For example, a capacitor C 0 that would conventionally be connected between the output node A and ground GND, as in FIG. 2 , of capacitance equal to 40 pF, would introduce a first cut-off frequency Fc 11 at 55 kHz; Fc 11 =½πR A C 0 .

The capacitor C connected between the drain and the gate of the transistor T 2 of the kind described with reference to FIG. 3 and of capacitance equal to 1 pF for its part introduces a first cut-off frequency Fc 21 at 20 kHz.

The variations in the voltage present on the node B are transmitted to the node A, via the transistor T 2 acting as a transconductance amplifier, and the variations transmitted to the node A are transmitted to the node D by the capacitor C. At the frequency Fc 21 , these variations are identical on nodes B and D, which causes the gain G 2 to fall.

However, when the frequency increases again, a second notable effect of the capacitor C is observed.

Specifically, with the increase in the frequency, the signal at A decreases and becomes equal to the signal at D, which itself is equal to the signal at B. This parity is observed starting from a frequency Fz, termed the zero occurrence frequency, Fz=½π(R T3 +R 3 )C, with R T3 the resistance of the transistor T 3 in the on state.

The capacitance C of the capacitor C is here advantageously a capacitance that is amplified by the transconductance gm T2 of the transistor T 2 .

Starting from the zero occurrence frequency Fz, the gain stops falling, which causes the phase P 2 to rise, which is beneficial for stability.

Moreover, starting from a second cut-off frequency Fc 2 , Fc 2 =½πR 2 *C 2 , the filter formed by the resistor R 2 and the capacitor C 2 causes the voltage present on the node B, and therefore also the voltage present on the node A, to fall.

In other words, the capacitor C in this configuration makes it possible to obtain, on the one hand, a first low-frequency cut-off for a low capacitance, and makes it possible, on the other hand, to increase the phase shift at the zero-gain frequency by an effect that could be qualified a band-pass capacitance multiplication effect.

With regard to stability, it can be seen from the phase curves P 1 , P 2 of FIG. 4 that, in the presence of the capacitor C, the phase margin increases by substantially 60° in this example.

In the absence of the capacitor C, the phase margin of the configuration in this example is around 20°, and around 80° with the loop BCL 1 including the capacitor C, which bears witness to an extremely good stability (it will be recalled that the conventional criterion for good stability is a phase offset of greater than 45°).

By way of comparison, a capacitor C 0 coupled in the manner described above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 and having a capacitance forty times greater than the capacitor C makes it possible to obtain a phase margin of around 40°.

Thus, the band-pass capacitance multiplication effect of the capacitor C not only makes it possible to reduce the area taken up by a conventional stabilizing capacitor by more than 90%, but also ensures a better performance.

FIG. 5 shows another example of an integrated circuit CI including a stage to be regulated REG 2 , as well as a regulation loop BCL 1 that is advantageously stabilized.

The regulation loop BCL 1 has the same structure and effects as the regulation loop described above with reference to FIG. 3 , and will not be detailed again here.

The stage to be regulated REG 2 , for its part, includes an NMOS-PMOS dual amplifier RFDA.

The stage to be regulated REG 2 includes an input terminal RFin that receives a radiofrequency voltage signal, amplified by a transconductance amplification stage TRSC including two cascode amplifiers CASC 7 , CASC 8 with a current output OUT.

The first cascode amplifier CASC 7 includes a transconductance amplification N-MOS transistor T 7 , the gate of which is coupled to the input terminal RFin, in series with a cascode N-MOS transistor TC 7 , the drain of which is connected to the output OUT.

The second cascode amplifier CASC 8 includes a transconductance amplification P-MOS transistor T 8 , the gate of which is coupled to the input terminal RFin, in series with a cascode P-MOS transistor TC 8 , the drain of which is connected to the output OUT.

A resistor R 2 connected between a supply voltage terminal VDD and the amplification transistor T 8 makes it possible to measure the bias current that passes through the cascoded amplifiers CASC 7 , CASC 8 of the NMOS-PMOS dual amplifier RFDA and flows to a ground terminal GND.

The output node A of the current regulation loop BCL 1 is connected to the gate of the transistor T 7 by a resistor R 7 , and the regulation is implemented in a manner similar to that described in relation to FIG. 3 .

Moreover, the invention is not limited to these embodiments, but encompasses all variants, for example the stages to be regulated REG 1 and REG 2 have been given by way of example, as have the various numerical values.

Claims as granted

22 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G05F3/02
  • G05F1/46
  • G05F1/10
  • G05F3/26
Section H — Electricity
  • H03F3/195
  • H03F3/16

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2017Jan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018Oct 2018Jan 2019Apr 2019Jul 2019USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.9 y
691 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Anh Q Tra
art unit 2842 · TC 2800
Citations: 9 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038Owner 2Owner 4
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock