USPatent applicationPatented

Cell control device and operation method therefor

Granted 3 Sep 2019 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: SK TELECOM CO., LTD. (SK Corporation) · originally SK Group

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Sung Ho Moon, Han Ho Wang, Young Lak Kim, Min Soo Na +3 · Examiner: Duc C Ho · AU 2465 · TC 2400

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20162018202020222024202620282030203220342036ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A cell control device achieves optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist. A method of operating a cell control device is also disclosed.

Description

11 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is the National Phase application of International Application No. PCT/KR2015/007877, filed on Jul. 28, 2015, which is based upon and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C § 119(a) of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-0172842, filed on Dec. 4, 2014, with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a cell control device capable of achieving optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength caused by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist, and a method of operating a cell control device.

›BACKGROUND ART

Mobile communications systems employ duplex technology to provide downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) service. The duplex technology may be largely divided into frequency division duplexing (FDD) and time division duplexing (TDD).

In FDD, frequency band allocated for DL transmission and frequency band allocated for UL transmission are fixed. As the utilization of the frequency band is not variable, it is difficult to efficiently respond to increased DL traffic.

In TDD, on the other hand, the same frequency band may be variably allocated to the downlink (DL) transmission or the uplink (UL) transmission depending on time intervals. A frame may be divided into sub-frames, and each of the sub-frames may be allocated for DL or UL transmission.

Such TDD can change the utilization of the same frequency band depending on time intervals and is evolving toward dynamic TDD (D-TDD) that allows for adaptively responding to DL/UL traffic by way of increasing the number of sub-frames in a frame that are allocated for DL transmission (hereinafter referred to as DL sub-frames) when the amount of DL traffic increases instantaneously while decreasing the number of sub-frames that are allocated for UL transmission (hereinafter referred to as UL sub-frames) according to the number of increased DL sub-frames, for example.

Recently, mobile communications systems install various types of cells such as pico-cells, femtocells and the like and evolve to increase transmission capacity per area by reutilizing frequency. As a result, a number of cells are densely disposed.

As such, in a network environment where a number of cells densely coexist, adjacent cells are very close to one another, and thus interference between adjacent cells becomes strong. In particular, if TDD is employed, there is a difference between the strengths of interference on DL and UL transmissions by an adjacent cells that affect another cell (hereinafter referred to as “DL interference” and “UL interference,” respectively). This is because the DL interference occurs when a base station constantly receiving power transmits data and thus is transmitted at higher transmission power than UL transmission.

In view of the above, the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure propose an approach to achieve optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist.

›DISCLOSURE

Technical Problem

An object of the present disclosure is to provide a cell control device capable of achieving optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist, and a method of operating a cell control device.

Technical Solution

In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, a cell control device includes: an interference detecting unit configured to detect a downlink (DL) interference from each of a plurality of adjacent cells measured at a particular cell; a cell selecting unit configured to select at least one adjacent cell from the plurality of adjacent cells based on at least one of a distance from the particular cell to each of the plurality of adjacent cells and the detected DL interference; and a cell control unit configured to allow, for a frequency band that the particular cell and the at least one adjacent cell use, the at least one adjacent cell to use the frequency band for uplink (UL) transmission at a time point when the particular cell uses the frequency band for DL transmission.

The device may further include: a cell grouping unit configured to sort the plurality of adjacent cells and the particular cell into two or more cell groups based on at least one of the distance from the particular cell to each of the plurality of adjacent cells and the detected DL interference, wherein the cell selecting unit selects the at least one adjacent cell from adjacent cell included in a cell group where the particular cell belongs.

The plurality of adjacent cells and the particular cell may transmit/receive UL or DL signals by using a frame having a structure that includes one or more flexible sub-frame, wherein the flexible sub-frames are flexibly allocated for UL transmission or DL transmission for a same frequency band.

The time point may be a point in time when the at least one adjacent cell use the flexible sub-frames.

The some adjacent cells selected from the plurality of adjacent cells may be closer to the particular cell and has stronger DL interference than the other adjacent cells, and has a ratio between UL and DL traffic amounts below a predetermined threshold ratio.

The particular cell may provide the at least one adjacent cell with a downlink signal transmitted by using the frequency band for DL transmission via a wired or wireless communications network at the time point, such that the at least one adjacent cell use the downlink signal from the particular cell to detect an interference signal when the at least one adjacent cell remove interference from an uplink signal received by using the frequency band for UL transmission at the time point.

In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, a method of operating a cell control device includes: detecting a downlink (DL) interference from each of a plurality of adjacent cells measured at a particular cell; selecting at least one adjacent cell from the plurality of adjacent cells based on at least one of a distance from the particular cell to each of the plurality of adjacent cells and the detected DL interference; and allowing, for a frequency band that the particular cell and the at least one adjacent cell use, the at least one adjacent cell to use the frequency band for uplink (UL) transmission at a time point when the particular cell uses the frequency band for DL transmission.

The method may further include: sorting the plurality of adjacent cells and the particular cell into two or more cell groups based on at least one of the distance from the particular cell to each of the plurality of adjacent cells and the detected DL interference,

wherein the selecting comprises selecting the at least one adjacent cell from adjacent cell included in a cell group where the particular cell belongs.

The plurality of adjacent cells and the particular cell may transmit/receive UL or DL signals by using a frame having a structure that includes one or more flexible sub-frame, wherein the flexible sub-frames are flexibly allocated for UL transmission or DL transmission for a same frequency band.

The time point may be a point in time when the at least one adjacent cell use the flexible sub-frames.

The some adjacent cells selected from the plurality of adjacent cells may be closer to the particular cell and have stronger DL interference than the other adjacent cells, and has a ratio between UL and DL traffic amounts below a predetermined threshold ratio.

Advantageous Effects

The cell control device and the method of operating the same according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure can achieve optimal interference control in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist, taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD.

›DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a communications system in a network environment where a number of cells coexist, to which an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is applied;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a cell control device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a view showing a frame structure used by a cell according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method of operating a cell control device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

›BEST MODE · 1 of 6

Hereinafter, an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a communications system to which an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is applied, i.e., a communications system in a network environment where a number of cells coexist.

As shown in FIG. 1 , in the environment where a number of cells coexist, adjacent cells are very close to one another, and thus inter-cell interference becomes strong.

In particular, various types of small cells such as pico-cells and femtocells are disposed recently, such that the transmission capacity per area is increasing by reusing frequency. As a result, cells are becoming denser and denser.

That is, the cells shown in FIG. 1 may be small cells such as pico-cells, femtocells, etc.

It is to be understood that the cells shown in FIG. 1 may be macro cells or a combination of macro cells and small cells.

In the following description, the cells C 1 to C 7 shown in FIG. 1 will be described as examples for convenience of illustration.

In addition, it is assumed that each of the cells employs time division duplexing (TDD) in the network environment where a number of cells densely coexist.

In TDD, the same frequency band may be variably allocated to the downlink (DL) transmission or the uplink (UL) transmission depending on time intervals. A frame may be divided into sub-frames, and each of the sub-frames may be allocated for DL or UL transmission.

Such TDD can change the utilization of the same frequency band depending on time intervals and is evolving toward dynamic TDD (D-TDD) that allows for adaptively responding to DL/UL traffic by way of increasing the number of sub-frames in a frame that are allocated for DL transmission (hereinafter referred to as DL sub-frames) when the amount of DL traffic increases instantaneously while decreasing the number of sub-frames that are allocated for UL transmission (hereinafter referred to as UL sub-frames) by the number of increased DL sub-frames, for example.

Accordingly, the cells C 1 to C 7 shown in FIG. 1 , which use the same frequency band F 1 , may adjust the number of DL sub-frames and the number of UL sub-frames in a frame depending on their DL/UL traffic by D-TDD, thereby adaptively utilizing frequency radio resources for DL/UL traffic.

Accordingly, in the network environment shown in FIG. 1 , the influence of interference between adjacent cells varies depending on how they utilize frequency radio resources.

For example, referring to a single cell C 1 , when an adjacent cell utilizes the frequency radio resources in the same manner with the cell C 1 for the frequency band F 1 , the interference by the DL transmission of the adjacent cell (DL interference) would affect the DL transmission of the cell C 1 , and the interference by the UL transmission of the adjacent cell (UL interference) would affect the UL transmission of the cell C 1 .

On the other hand, for an adjacent cell that utilizes frequency radio resource in the opposite manner to the cell C 1 for the frequency band F 1 , the DL interference by the adjacent cell would affect the UL transmission of the cell C 1 , and the UL interference by the adjacent cell would affect the DL transmission of the cell C 1 .

In addition, in the network environment shown in FIG. 1 , there is a difference between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell that affects a cell.

This is because the DL interference occurs when a base station constantly receiving power transmits data and thus is transmitted at higher transmission power than UL transmission.

Accordingly, a terminal 10 located in the cell C 1 is greatly affected by the DL interference of an adjacent cell that utilizes frequency radio resource in the same manner as the cell C 1 and thus undergoes serious cell capacity reduction.

In view of the above, it has been appreciated that the influence of the interference in the network environment where a number of cells C 1 to C 7 employing TDD densely coexist as shown in FIG. 1 can be changed by adjusting frequency radio resource utilization of each of the cells, and that there is a difference between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell. Accordingly, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure propose an approach to achieve optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD.

More specifically, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure propose a cell control device capable of achieving optimal interference control taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD in a network environment as shown in FIG. 1 .

Hereinafter, a cell control device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 2 .

A cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure includes: an interference detecting unit 110 that detects DL interference from each of a plurality of adjacent cells measured at a particular cell; a cell selecting unit 130 that selects at least one adjacent cell from among the plurality of adjacent cells based on a distance from the particular cell to each of the plurality of adjacent cells and/or the detected DL interference; and a cell control unit 140 that allows a frequency band that the particular cell and the at least one adjacent cell use in the same manner to be utilized for UL transmission in the at least one adjacent cell at a time point when the particular cell utilizes the frequency band for DL transmission.

Herein, the particular cell refers to a target cell that is a reference for the cell control function performed by the cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

›BEST MODE · 2 of 6

In the following description, among the cells C 1 to C 7 shown in FIG. 1 , the cell C 1 will be described as the reference for convenience of illustration.

The interference detecting unit 110 detects downlink (DL) interference from each of the plurality of adjacent cells measured at a particular cell, i.e., the cell C 1 .

For example, at the cell C 1 , DL interference from each of the adjacent cells may be measured.

The DL interference may be measured by using a pilot signal having a unique pattern for each of the cells. There are many ways to measure the interference. For example, one of the cells C 1 to C 7 , e.g., the cell C 1 may transmit a pilot signal and the other cells may receive it, then the other cells C 2 to C 7 may measure the interference in the pilot signal (DL) from the cell C 1 .

In this manner, the interference detecting unit 110 may detect the DL interference from each of the plurality of adjacent cells measured at the cell C 1 .

The plurality of adjacent cells may refer to the cells C 2 to C 7 other than the cell C 1 .

The cell selecting unit 130 may select at least one adjacent cell from among the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and/or the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 .

Before describing the cell selecting unit 130 in detail, the cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure may further include a cell grouping unit 120 .

The cell grouping unit 120 may sort the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 into two or more cell groups based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and/or the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 .

More specifically, based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 , the cell grouping unit 120 may define some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 that are within a predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 as the same cell group with the cell C 1 , and may define the other cells that are out of the predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 as another cell group.

Alternatively, based on the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 , the cell grouping unit 120 may define adjacent cells having the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 above a predetermined threshold interference as the same cell group with the cell C 1 while it may define the other adjacent cells having the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 below the predetermined threshold interference as another cell group.

Alternatively, based both on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 , the cell grouping unit 120 may define some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 that are within the predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 and have the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 above the predetermined threshold interference as the same cell group with the cell C 1 , and may define the other cells as another cell group.

In the following description, it is assumed that the cell grouping unit 120 defines the cells C 1 to C 4 as belonging to a cell group G 1 and the cells C 5 to C 7 as belonging to a cell group G 2 , as shown in FIG. 1 for convenience of illustration.

In the exemplary embodiment where the cell control device 100 includes the cell grouping unit 120 , the cell selecting unit 130 may select the at least one adjacent cell only from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 belonging to the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs between the two or more cell groups G 1 and G 2 .

In the exemplary embodiment where the cell control device 100 does not include the cell grouping unit 120 , on the other hand, the cell selecting unit 130 may select at least one adjacent cell that are closer to the cell C 1 and have stronger DL interference than the other adjacent cells at first from among the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 , based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and/or the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 .

Then, the cell selecting unit 130 may select the at least one adjacent cell only from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 selected at first as described above.

In the network environment as shown in FIG. 1 , the adjacent cells selected at first by the cell selecting unit 130 may be similar to the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 in the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs according to the above-described exemplary embodiment.

According to the above-described exemplary embodiment where the cell groups G 1 and G 2 are defined in advance, however, the cells in the respective cell groups do not change unless the layout of the cells is changed, and thus the process of selecting the at least one adjacent cell finally by the cell selecting unit 130 can be simpler and the time taken to select them can be saved.

In the network environment where a number of cells C 1 to C 7 densely coexist as shown in FIG. 1 , an adjacent cell closer to the cell C 1 is likely to have stronger DL interference measured at the cell C 1 among the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 . In this perspective, it may be considered that an adjacent cell having a stronger DL interference measured at the cell C 1 is closer to the cell C 1 .

That is, according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, from the perspective of the cell C 1 that is the reference of the cell control function performed by the cell control device 100 , the at least one adjacent cell are selected only from among the adjacent cells that are closer to the cell C 1 and have stronger DL interference than the other adjacent cells.

Hereinafter, a process of selecting the at least one adjacent cell from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 selected by the cell selecting unit 130 at first as described above or the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 in the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs will be described in detail.

›BEST MODE · 3 of 6

It is to be understood that the cell selecting unit 130 may select all cells of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 firstly selected as described above or the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 in the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs as the at least one adjacent cell.

It is to be noted that the cell control unit 140 to be described below, which controls the at least one adjacent cell selected by the cell selecting unit 130 for control the interference affecting the particular cell, i.e., the cell C 1 , should not ignore the frequency radio resource utilization performed by the adjacent cells themselves based on D-TDD.

Accordingly, it is desirable to select the at least one adjacent cell from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 selected at first as described above or the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 in the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belong, taking into account the frequency radio resource utilization performed by the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 themselves based on D-TDD.

More specifically, as described above, it is assumed that the plurality of cells C 1 to C 7 shown in FIG. 1 , i.e., the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 employ TDD.

Accordingly, the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 , as shown in FIG. 3 , for example, may utilize sub-frames of a frame A to be allocated for DL and UL transmissions, and may even utilize the frequency radio resource adaptively to DL/UL traffics by D-TDD.

That is, the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 transmit/receive UL/DL signals by using a frame including one or more flexible sub-frames, which can be used flexibly for UL transmission or DL transmission for the same frequency band.

Referring to FIG. 3 , a frame A used for the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 may include at least one DL sub-frame fixedly allocated for DL transmission and at least one UL sub-frame fixedly allocated for UL transmission for the same frequency bandwidth F 1 , and at least one flexible sub-frame (F_S/F) flexibly allocated for DL or UL transmissions for the same frequency band F 1 (e.g., two DL sub-frames, one UL sub-frame, and three flexible sub-frames).

It is to be understood that the frame structure shown in FIG. 3 is merely an example. For example, all of the sub-frames in the frame may be flexible sub-frames (F_S/F).

In the following description, the frame A having the structure shown in FIG. 3 will be described in detail for convenience of illustration.

Each of the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 utilizes frequency radio resources adaptively to DL/UL traffic by way of allocating more flexible sub-frames F_S/F to DL transmission to increase the number of the DL sub-frames and decreasing the number of UL sub-frames to adjust the numbers of the DL sub-frames and the number of the UL sub-frames in the frame A when the amount of DL traffic is increased instantaneously according to DL/UL traffic taken in the cell.

If the adjacent cells selected at first by the cell selecting unit 130 or the adjacent cells in the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs are C 2 to C 4 as described above, the cell selecting unit 130 preferably selects adjacent cells having a ratio of the amount of traffic between UL and DL transmissions below a predetermined threshold ratio from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 as the at least one adjacent cell finally.

That is, the cell selecting unit 130 selects some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 having a ratio between UL and DL traffic amounts below a threshold ratio as the at least one adjacent cell finally. For example, the adjacent cells that do not require all of the flexible sub-frames F_S/F in the frame A to be used for DL transmission in utilizing frequency radio resource by D-TDD is selected as the at least one adjacent cell.

In the following description, it is assumed that all of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 have the ratio below the threshold ratio for convenience of illustration.

In this case, the cell selecting unit 130 would select the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 as the at least one adjacent cell finally.

For a frequency band that the cell C 1 and the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 selected by the cell selecting unit 130 use in the same manner, the cell control unit 140 allows the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 to use the frequency band for UL transmission at a time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band for DL transmission.

That is, as described above, for the frequency band F 1 that the cell C 1 and the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use in the same manner, the cell control unit 140 controls the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 so that the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use UL sub-frames for the frequency band F 1 at the time point when the cell C 1 uses DL sub-frames for the frequency band F 1 .

Herein, the time point may refer to a point in time when the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use flexible sub-frames F_S/F.

In addition, the cell control unit 140 may control the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 in a variety of manners.

For example, the cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure may be an independent base station that operates cells. In the above-described exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure where the cell C 1 is the particular cell that is the reference of the cell control function performed by the cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the base station 1 operating the cell C 1 may be the cell control device 100 .

In this case, the cell control device 100 may transmit the configuration information of the frame A being used by the cell C 1 , a cell control request or the like to the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 via a wired/wireless communications network, such that it may indirectly control the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 so that they use UL sub-frames at the time point when the cell C 1 uses a DL sub-frame according to the received information and the request.

›BEST MODE · 4 of 6

Alternatively, the cell control device 100 may be an additional device that centrally manages the cells C 1 to C 7 or may be a base station module BU of each of separated base stations forming the cells C 1 to C 7 , which controls a radio module RU of the respective base stations.

In this case, the cell control device 100 may directly control RU 2 , 3 and 4 of the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 so that they use UL sub-frames at the time point when the cell C 1 uses a DL sub-frame.

Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 1 , according to the cell control function by the cell control device 100 , the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 that are likely to cause serious DL interference on the DL transmission of the cell C 1 use the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band F 1 for DL transmission, and thus a possible DL interference by the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 is changed to a possible UL interference, which is less serious than the DL interference. As a result, the terminal 10 using DL service in the cell C 1 can avoid DL interference by the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 .

Incidentally, as the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 use the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band F 1 for DL transmission according to the cell control function by the cell control device 100 , UL transmission of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 may be likely to be seriously affected by the DL interference by the cell C 1 .

Accordingly, it is necessary to remove interference signals (DL interference by the cell C 1 ) efficiently from UL transmission of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 .

To this end, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a particular cell, i.e., the cell C 1 provides at least one adjacent cell, i.e., the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 with a downlink signal transmitted by using the frequency band F 1 for DL transmission at a certain time point via a wired/wireless communications network.

Accordingly, the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 can detect an interference signal by using the DL signal provided from the cell C 1 when they remove the interference signal from an UL signal received by using the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point.

More specifically, typical cells including the cell C 1 and the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 use a technique to detect an interference signal from an UL signal and remove the detected interference signal. In the above-described technique, how to detect an interference signal and how to remove the detected interference signal from an UL signal are well known in the art; and, therefore, detailed description thereon will not be made.

Accordingly, each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 3 also would detect an interference signal from an UL signal received by using the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point and remove the detected interference signal.

In doing so, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, as the cell C 1 provides the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 with a downlink signal, the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 use the downlink signal in place of a detected interference signal when they remove interference from an uplink signal received by using the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point, thereby removing an interference signal (i.e., the downlink signal from the cell C 1 ) from the uplink signal.

Accordingly, even if the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 use the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band F 1 for DL transmission, the DL interference by the cell C 1 can be accurately and quickly removed from UL transmission of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 according to the cell control function by the cell control device 100 as described above.

As described above, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD densely coexist, a cell control device performs cell control function based on D-TDD such that adjacent cells, which are likely to affect serious DL interference on a DL transmission of a particular cell, use a frequency band for UL transmission at a time point when the particular cell uses the frequency band for DL transmission, taking into account that the influence of the interference can be changed by adjusting the utilization of frequency radio resources of each of the cells, and that there is a difference between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell.

Consequently, the cell control device according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure can achieve optimal interference control in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist, taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD.

Hereinafter, a method of operating a cell control device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 4 . For convenience of illustration, the same reference numerals as those of FIGS. 1 to 3 are used in the following description.

The method of operating the cell control device 100 according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure includes detecting DL interference from each of a plurality of adjacent cells measured at a particular cell, i.e., a cell C 1 (step S 100 ).

For example, at the cell C 1 , DL interference from each of the adjacent cells may be measured.

To measure the DL interference, a pilot signal having a unique pattern for each of the cells may be used. There are many ways to measure the interference. For example, one of the cells C 1 to C 7 , e.g., the cell C 1 may transmit a pilot signal and the other cells may receive it, then the other cells C 2 to C 7 may measure the interference in the pilot signal (DL) from the cell C 1 .

As a result, the DL interference can be detected from each of a plurality of adjacent cells measured at the cell C 1 .

›BEST MODE · 5 of 6

The plurality of adjacent cells may refer to the cells C 2 to C 7 other than the cell C 1 .

Subsequently, the method includes sorting the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the cell C 1 into two or more cell groups based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and/or the downlink (DL) interference detected in step S 100 (step S 110 ).

More specifically, based on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 , some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 that are within a predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 may be defined as the same cell group with the cell C 1 , and the other cells that are out of the predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 may be defined as another cell group.

Alternatively, based on the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 in step S 100 , adjacent cells having the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 above a predetermined threshold interference may be defined as the same cell group with the cell C 1 while the other adjacent cells having the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 below the predetermined threshold interference may be defined as another cell group.

Alternatively, based both on the distance from the cell C 1 to each of the plurality of adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 and the DL interference detected by the interference detecting unit 110 in step S 100 , some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 7 that are within a predetermined threshold distance from the cell C 1 and have the DL interference measured at the cell C 1 above the predetermined threshold interference may be defined as the same cell group with the cell C 1 , and the other cells may be defined as another cell group.

In the following description, it is assumed that the cells C 1 to C 4 are defined as belonging to a cell group G 1 and the cells C 5 to C 7 are defined as belonging to a cell group G 2 , as shown in FIG. 1 for convenience of illustration.

Subsequently, the method may include checking adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 belonging to the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belonging among previously defined two or more cell groups G 1 and G 2 (step S 120 ).

Eventually, the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 belonging to the cell group G 1 where the cell C 1 belongs would be likely to seriously affect the DL transmission of the cell C 1 by DL interference.

Then, the method may include selecting at least one adjacent cell from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 checked in step S 120 .

More specifically, the method may include finally selecting some of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 checked in step S 120 that have a ratio between UL and DL traffic amount below a predetermined threshold ratio as the at least one adjacent cell (step S 130 ).

That is, the adjacent cells having the ratio between UL and DL traffic amounts below the threshold ratio are finally selected from among the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 , i.e., the adjacent cells that do not require all of the flexible sub-frames F_S/F in the frame A to be used for DL transmission in utilizing frequency radio resource by D-TDD as the at least one adjacent cell.

In the following description, it is assumed that all of the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 have the ratio between UL and DL traffic amounts below the threshold ratio for convenience of illustration.

In this case, the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 would be finally selected as the at least one adjacent cell in step S 130 .

Subsequently, the method includes allowing the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 to use a frequency band for UL transmission at a time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band for DL transmission for the frequency band that the cell C 1 and the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 selected in step S 130 use in the same manner (step S 140 ).

That is, as described above, for the frequency band F 1 that the cell C 1 and the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use in the same manner, the method controls the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 such that the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use UL sub-frames at the time point when the cell C 1 uses DL sub-frames.

Herein, the time point may refer to a point in time when the at least one adjacent cell C 2 to C 4 use flexible sub-frames F_S/F.

Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 1 , according to the cell control function by the cell control device 100 , the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 that are likely to cause serious DL interference on the DL transmission of the cell C 1 use the frequency band F 1 for UL transmission at the time point when the cell C 1 uses the frequency band F 1 for DL transmission, and thus a possible DL interference by the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 is changed to a possible UL interference, which is less serious than the DL interference. As a result, the terminal 10 using DL service in the cell C 1 can avoid DL interference by the adjacent cells C 2 to C 4 .

Subsequently, the method includes determining whether the cell control function is completed (step S 150 ). If it is determined that the cell control function is not completed (No in step S 150 ), it may return to step S 100 to repeat processes thereafter with another cell, e.g., the cell C 2 as the particular cell.

As described above, the method of operating a cell control device according to the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure can achieve optimal interference control in a network environment where a number of cells employing TDD coexist, taking into account a different between the DL interference strength and the UL interference strength by an adjacent cell by way of controlling cells based on D-TDD.

The method of operating a cell control device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure may be implemented as program instructions that may be executed by a various types of computers and may be stored in a computer-readable medium. The computer-readable medium may include program instructions, data files, data structure or the like alone or a combination thereof. The program instructions stored on the medium may be ones specially configured for the present disclosure or any ones well known and available to those skilled in the field of computer software. Examples of the computer-readable storage medium may include magnetic media such as a hard disk, a floppy disk and a magnetic tape; optical media such as a CD-ROM and a DVD; magneto-optical media such as a floppy disk; and hardware devices specially configured to store and execute program instructions, such as a ROM, a RAM, a flash memory or the like. Examples of the program instructions may include machine language codes such as ones being made by compilers as well as high-level language codes capable of being executed by computers using interpreters or the like. The hardware devices may be configured to be operated as one or more software modules to perform operations according to the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, or vise versa.

›BEST MODE · 6 of 6

Although the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure have been described for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and substitutions are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims. Such modifications, additions and substitutions are also construed as falling within the scope of the present disclosure.

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04L5/14
  • H04W16/10
  • H04W36/20
  • H04W36/00
  • H04L5/00
  • H04W36/22
  • H04W72/54

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.1 y
1,498 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Duc C Ho
art unit 2465 · TC 2400
Citations: 8 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2018202020222024202620282030203220342036Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock