USPatent applicationPatented

Method for preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one

Granted 5 Jun 2018 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Rohm And Haas Company · originally DuPont

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Randall W. Stephens · Examiner: Samantha L Shterengarts · AU 1626 · TC 1600

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom201420162018202020222024202620282030203220342036ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method for preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one by contacting 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one with an alkali metal hydroxide and dimethyl sulfate.

Description

9 parts
›This invention relates to a method for preparation…

This invention relates to a method for preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one.

Methylation of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one with agents such as methyl iodide and dimethyl sulfate is known. For example, A. Reissert & E. Manus, Chem. Ber ., (1928), vol. 61, pp. 1308-1316, disclose methylation of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one with methyl iodide. However, this reaction produces mostly the O-alkylation product rather than 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one. There is a need for a more effective preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one.

The problem addressed by this invention is to provide an improved preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one.

›STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a method for preparation of 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one from 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one; said method comprising contacting 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one with an alkali metal hydroxide and dimethyl sulfate.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

“BIT” is 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one. “MBIT” is 2-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one. Unless otherwise specified, temperatures are in degrees centigrade (° C.), references to percentages are percentages by weight (wt %) and amounts and ratios are on a weight basis. Unless otherwise specified, all operations were performed at room temperature (20-25° C.) and at atmospheric pressure (101 kPa).

Preferably, the peak temperature of the reaction mixture during dimethyl sulfate addition is no greater than 40° C., preferably no greater than 35° C., preferably no greater than 30° C., preferably no greater than 25° C., preferably no greater than 20° C., preferably no greater than 15° C., preferably no greater than 10° C.; preferably the peak temperature of the reaction mixture is at least −5° C., preferably at least 0° C., preferably at least 2° C., preferably at least 4° C.

Preferably, the alkali metal hydroxide is sodium, lithium or potassium hydroxide; preferably sodium or potassium hydroxide. Mixtures of alkali metal hydroxides may be used. Preferably, the ratio of moles of hydroxide to moles of BIT is at least 0.7/1, preferably at least 0.8/1, preferably at least 0.9/1, preferably at least 0.95/1, preferably at least 1/1; preferably no greater than 2/1, preferably no greater than 1.5/1, preferably no greater than 1.2/1, preferably no greater than 1.1/1, preferably no greater than 1.05/1.

Preferably, the reaction is carried out in a solvent or mixture of solvents. Preferred solvents include, e.g., water, acetonitrile and other polar aprotic solvents (e.g., N,N-dimethylformamide), and ethers (e.g., polyethylene glycol ethers, glymes, dibutyl ether, crown ethers). Water is especially preferred.

Preferably, BIT and the alkali metal hydroxide are combined (preferably in solvent(s)) and the resulting mixture is contacted with dimethyl sulfate. Preferably, BIT, solvent and the alkali metal hydroxide are combined to form a mixture comprising the alkali metal salt of BIT, and then dimethyl sulfate is added to the mixture comprising the alkali metal salt of BIT. Preferably, the dimethyl sulfate is added at a rate which allows the reaction temperature to remain within the preferred limits. This rate can be determined easily based on various factors including, e.g., cooling capacity of the equipment, size of the reactor, the temperature at the beginning of the addition, heat capacity of the reaction mixture and other factors known in the art.

The reaction time may be determined by the usual known methods, e.g., taking samples for analysis to determine completeness of alkylation, and will of course depend on the temperature and the exact nature of the reactants. In general, it is preferred that the reaction time is at least 10 minutes, preferably at least 15 minutes, preferably at least 30 minutes. The upper bound on the reaction time is not critical because the product is stable in the reaction mixture, but for practical reasons it is preferred that it not exceed 24 hours, preferably 12 hours, preferably 6 hours. The reaction time is measured starting at completion of dimethyl sulfate addition. Preferably, the reaction occurs at approximately normal atmospheric pressure (101 kPa±10%).

MBIT is the desired product resulting from methylation on the nitrogen atom of BIT (“N-alkylation”) by dimethyl sulfate. 2-methoxy-1,2-benzisothiazole (MOBIT) is the undesired byproduct resulting from methylation on the carbonyl oxygen atom of BIT (“O-alkylation”). Separation of the N-methyl product from the O-methyl product may be achieved using standard techniques for separation of organic compounds, e.g., crystallization, distillation and extraction.

EXAMPLES
›Examples5
›Example 1

To a 100 mL 3 neck round bottom flask equipped with a thermometer, external water bath, magnetic stirring bar and pressure equalizing addition funnel at room temperature was added 5.00 g of commercial grade 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one (85% BIT, 15% water; 0.0279 mol), 40 ml of water and 2.25 g of 50% sodium hydroxide solution (0.0281 mol). Stirring was initiated and over the course of approximately 5 minutes, 2.9 ml of dimethyl sulfate (DMS) was added using a gas tight syringe. The temperature remained within the range from 20-25° C. throughout the addition and subsequent reaction time. After a 30 minute reaction time, sodium hydroxide solution was added until the pH was above 9. To the stirred mixture was added 20 ml of ethyl acetate and the mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel using another 20 ml of solvent to rinse the residual contents of the flask into the separatory funnel. The layers were separated and the upper organic layer was washed with a small volume of saturated sodium chloride solution, separated, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 4.23 g of light yellow oil in which a few crystals formed. Heating the sample allows induced the crystals to redissolve and this homogeneous sample was analyzed.

Analysis of this material by HPLC found it to contain 84% MBIT and 16% MOBIT, a calculated N-methylation ratio of 5.4 to 1.

›Example 2

In a manner similar to Example 1 except that the sodium hydroxide was replaced with roughly an equal molar amount of potassium hydroxide was obtained 4.37 g of a crystal/oil mixture. The ratio of MBIT to MOBIT was calculated to be 5.4 to 1.

›Example 3

In a manner similar to Example 2, except that the reaction temperature was lowered to and maintained at 5° C., was obtained 4.20 g of light yellow oil that crystallized over time. The ratio of MBIT to MOBIT was calculated to be 8.3 to 1.

›Example 4

In a manner similar to Example 1 except that the sodium hydroxide was replaced with roughly an equal molar amount of lithium hydroxide was obtained 4.27 g of a crystal/oil mixture. The ratio of MBIT to MOBIT was calculated to be 5.6 to 1.

›Example 5

In a manner similar to Example 1 except that 0.13 g of tetrabutylammonium bromide was added prior to the dimethyl sulfate addition was obtained 4.10 g of a waxy solid. The ratio of MBIT to MOBIT was calculated to be 5.6 to 1.

Comparative Example 1

To a 100 mL 3 neck round bottom flask equipped with a thermometer, magnetic stirring bar and pressure equalizing addition funnel was added 3.90 g potassium carbonate, 4.25 g of dried 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one along with 50 mL of anhydrous acetonitrile. Stirring was initiated and the sand-like slurry became more flocculent over time. Over approximately 90 minutes, 2.9 mL of dimethyl sulfate was slowly added dropwise to the mixture. The reaction mixture thinned considerably over time and after holding for 30 minutes after the end of the dimethyl sulfate addition, 1 mL of water was added. The mixture was filtered and the liquid phase was concentrated to afford an oily residue. This material was partitioned between ethyl acetate and saturated sodium chloride solution to which a small amount of NaOH was added to destroy any remaining dimethyl sulfate. The layers were separated and upper organic layer was washed with a second volume of saturated sodium chloride solution (no added NaOH), separated, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under vacuum to afford 4.87 g of a light tan oil.

Analysis of this material found it to contain 65.7% MBIT and 26.3% MOBIT, a calculated MBIT to MOBIT ratio of only 2.5:1.

1 of 9 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

7 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

1 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07D275/04

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2015Jan 2016Apr 2016Jul 2016Oct 2016Jan 2017Apr 2017Jul 2017Oct 2017Jan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.6 y
937 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Samantha L Shterengarts
art unit 1626 · TC 1600
Citations: 7 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2018202020222024202620282030203220342036Owner 1Owner 3
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock