USPatent applicationPatented

Adaptive body biasing in CMOS circuits to extend the input common mode operating range

Granted 16 Oct 2018 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Wells Fargo · originally Maxlinear

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Pekka Ojala, Vinit Jayaraj, John Tabler · Examiner: Kevnneth B Wells · AU 2842 · TC 2800

Life of the application

13 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In order to get the best of both high and low common mode ranges, an adaptive body biasing method using a pair of replica devices is implemented. Each replica device corresponds to a NMOS (or PMOS) device that constitutes the input pair used in a logic circuit or other type of integrated circuits. This configuration helps to increase the threshold voltage of the device, utilizing body effect, at high input common mode voltage, as desired for NMOS, and at low input common mode voltage, as desired for PMOS. At the same time, this configuration scales the threshold back to normal at low input common mode voltages, thereby countering the negative impact of body effect. In short, the body bias applied to the NMOS (or PMOS) device helps in adapting the threshold voltage to the operating condition.

Description

7 parts
BACKGROUND
›Technical Field

Described are methods and apparatus for biasing integrated circuit devices to extract desired performance range.

Brief Description of the Prior Art

In a typical Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) circuit having an input stage comprising negative-channel MOS (NMOS) devices or positive-channel MOS (PMOS) devices, the maximum or minimum input common mode voltage is determined by the threshold voltage of the NMOS or PMOS.

In the case of an NMOS input pair, to achieve a high common mode input range, the body of the NMOS input pair is typically connected to Ground (GND) or the lowest voltage (Vss) in order to raise the threshold voltage through body effect. The body effect is the change in threshold voltage of a transistor due to the voltage difference between the source and bulk (substrate) of the transistor device. Connecting the body of the input pair NMOS devices to Ground has a negative impact in that the low common mode input range is sacrificed and the NMOS devices will turn off earlier as the input common mode voltage is decreased.

In case of a PMOS input pair, to achieve a low common mode input range, the body of the PMOS input pair is typically connected to Supply or highest voltage (Vcc) in order to raise the threshold voltage through body effect. This has a negative impact in that the high common mode input range is sacrificed and the PMOS devices will turn off earlier as the input common mode voltage is increased.

›SUMMARY

A biasing scheme is required in NMOS and PMOS input devices to counter the known problem of early turn-off described above so that devices can be operated in a wider operating range of common mode voltage. Additionally, the biasing scheme should be such that small signal source-body voltage of the NMOS or PMOS devices would not detrimentally affect the input device's gain.

In order to get the best of both high and low common mode ranges, an adaptive body biasing method using a pair of replica devices is implemented. Each replica device corresponds to a NMOS (or PMOS) device that constitutes the input pair used in an integrated circuit, such as a differential pair circuit, operational amplifier, comparator, amplifying gain stages etc. The replica device is chosen so that the intrinsic device parameters and dimensions of the replica device match as closely as possible with the parameters and dimensions of the corresponding NMOS (or PMOS) device. In order to bias the input device's body independently of the source and substrate potentials, the device is built in an isolated well structure of the process. The replica device will also use an isolated well structure to closely match the input device electrical behavior. The body bias applied to the NMOS (or PMOS) device helps in adapting the threshold voltage to the operating condition. Embodiments of this disclosure help to increase the threshold voltage of the device, utilizing body effect, at high input common mode voltage, as desired for NMOS, and at low input common mode voltage, as desired for PMOS. At the same time, the embodiments scale the threshold back to normal at low input common mode voltages, thereby countering the negative impact of body effect.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the disclosure in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a circuit demonstrating the large signal advantage of adaptive body biasing, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a plot showing the DC variation of common mode voltage in the large signal configuration shown in FIG. 1 , as well as how V s1 and V s2 change with respect to the common mode voltage;

FIG. 3 is a schematic of a circuit demonstrating the small signal advantage of adaptive body biasing, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 4 shows the NMOS source follower small-signal equivalent circuit that can be used to calculate the gain of a stage, according to an embodiment;

FIG. 5 shows an AC small signal model of the gain stage source follower circuit shown in FIG. 4 ;

FIG. 6 shows an example circuit topology where the body biasing scheme of the present disclosure can be applied; and

FIG. 7 shows an example circuit where threshold voltage of transistors increases with common mode voltage not just by body effect, but also by a drop across a source resistor.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 3

Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, which are provided as illustrative examples of the disclosure so as to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure. Notably, the figures and examples below are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure to a single embodiment, but other embodiments are possible by way of interchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements.

Moreover, where certain elements of the present disclosure can be partially or fully implemented using known components, only those portions of such known components that are necessary for an understanding of the present disclosure will be described, and detailed descriptions of other portions of such known components will be omitted so as not to obscure the disclosure.

In the present specification, an embodiment showing a singular component should not be considered limiting; rather, the disclosure is intended to encompass other embodiments including a plurality of the same component or nested stages, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. Moreover, applicants do not intend for any term in the specification or claims to be ascribed an uncommon or special meaning unless explicitly set forth as such. Further, the present disclosure encompasses present and future known equivalents to the known components referred to herein by way of illustration.

Referring to FIG. 1 , a schematic is shown demonstrating the large signal advantage of adaptive body biasing. The schematic in FIG. 1 is shown for an NMOS input pair case, but a similar circuit configuration can be used for a PMOS input pair case as well, though the common mode voltage requirement would be different when PMOS devices are used rather than NMOS devices. FIG. 1 describes the DC operating input common mode voltage (VCM) range for large signal operation, where voltages are described with an upper case ‘V.’ Also, it is to be noted that only one NMOS device (with its corresponding replica device) of the input pair is shown for simplicity. Persons skilled in the art would understand that another NMOS device (and its corresponding replica device) would complete the input stage. A plurality of devices in parallel, or additional nested devices forming a hierarchy of stages can be used as well.

In FIG. 1 , M 1A is one of the NMOS devices in the main input pair. M 1A _ R is the replica device. Use of this replica device (and body effect on this replica device) is a unique feature of this disclosure. Note that the body of the replica device M 1A _ R is tied to ground whereas the body of M 1A is driven by the source of M 1A _ R . The body effect of MOSFET changes the device's threshold voltage V th as the following equations:

V th =V TO +γ(√{square root over ( V SB +2ϕ F )}−√{square root over (2ϕ F )})  (Eq 1), where

γ=√{square root over (2ε s qN A )}/ C ox   (Eq 2)

In the first equation above, VTO indicates threshold voltage when V SB is zero, γ indicates the body effect coefficient set by material parameters, and Φ F is a constant whose value depends on the manufacturing process doping concentration of device bulk region and temperature. In the second equation above, q indicates electric charge, ε s indicates dielectric constant of semiconductor, N A indicates acceptor concentration, and C ox indicates oxide capacitance per unit area. It is to be noted that since M 1A _ R is a replica device of M IA , the device parameters, such as VTO, γ etc. match between M IA _ R and M IA . In general, the replica device is chosen so that the intrinsic device parameters and dimensions of the replica device match as closely as possible with the parameters and dimensions of the corresponding main NMOS (or PMOS) device in the circuit. The only parameter that is changing is the source-body voltage V SB of M IA in order to control threshold voltage via change in V SB . Therefore, over process and temperature variation, the matching between M IA _ R and M IA remains substantially intact. In general, the replica device is built using commonly used layout matching techniques to replicate the geometry, layer stack, surrounding environment and electrical behavior of the input device as closely as possible when bias-points voltages at terminals match. The replica device is commonly placed in immediate vicinity of the input device in order to reduce the effect of the silicon material parameters variation across space between devices. Both input device and replica device are built in isolated well structures in order to enable bulk region biasing independent of substrate potential.

The gates of M 1A _ R and M 1A are connected to the same input voltage. In this schematic, the gates are connected to a common mode voltage of V CM . M 1A _ R is biased as a source follower with a constant current source. I S is the DC bias current. Body effect on M 1A _ R is utilized on purpose to have V S1 change non-linearly as V CM changes.

At low V CM , source voltage V si of the replica device will be closer to V CM . AS shown in FIG. 1 , body voltage V B2 of M IA is tied to the source voltage V si of replica device M IA _ R . Threshold voltage increase on M IA is minimized by driving its body voltage V B2 closer to its source voltage V S2 . This means V si is approximately equal to V s2 . Under this operating condition, (V S2 −V B2 ) is small, implying that V CM can go lower and only be limited by the intrinsic threshold voltage (V TH ˜V ro ) of M IA and is not altered by the body effect.

FIG. 2 shows the variation of V si and V S2 from a low common mode voltage range to a high common mode voltage range, with respect to reference common mode voltage V CM . At high V CM , V SI diverges from V CM further and (V CM −V si ) increases due to the body effect, as shown in FIG. 2 . Since V si gets relatively lower compared to V CM , as V CM increases, (V s2 −V B2 ) increases, the body effect on MIA increases and the effective threshold voltage of M IA increases. This increases the high common mode range on V CM and M IA will stay in saturation even at high V CM −V S2 largely follows V CM while V si deviates from it.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 3

In short, the advantage of adaptive body biasing for large signal is that, at low V CM , threshold increase of M 1A is minimized by driving its body to be close to its source, i.e. keeping (V S2 −V B2 ) small, thereby improving low V CM range. At high V CM , since body of M 1A _ R is at GND, V S1 diverges from V S2 , increasing (V S2 −V B2 ) and increasing the threshold of M 1 A, thereby improving high common mode voltage range.

Referring to FIG. 3 , a schematic is shown demonstrating the small signal advantage of adaptive body biasing for the same circuit shown in FIG. 1 . Specifically, FIG. 3 is shown to analyze the effect of body effect in the ac small signal domain. As described above, the schematic is shown for an NMOS input pair case, but can be applied to a PMOS input pair case as well. The small signal voltages are described with a lower case ‘v,’ for example, v ac . FIG. 4 shows the AC small signal voltages of a gain stage source follower circuit of prior art, i.e. without the replica device. FIG. 5 shows an AC small signal model of the circuit shown in FIG. 4 .

In FIG. 3 , V CM is the input DC common mode input as described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 , v ac is the AC small signal applied to the differential input pair. The SENSE+voltage is used to calculate current flowing through R GM , as described below with respect to FIG. 6 . As SENSE+voltage moves with v ac , source voltage v s1 of the replica device M 1A _ R moves and source voltage v s2 of the input pair NMOS device M 1A also moves. Since v s1 and v s2 move in tandem, the small signal source-body voltage v sb of M 1A , which is equal to (v s2 −v s1 ), is small or negligible. Hence the (g mb ·v sb ) current source (shown in FIG. 5 ) in the small signal model of M 1A disappears or will have negligible effect on the small signal gain perspective. As obvious to persons skilled in the art, g mb is the body transconductance used to model the current source in the small signal model taking body effect into account.

For small signal, the ideal condition is to make v sb of M 1A equal to zero. To make body bias v sb of M 1A small, [i.e., to meet the condition v sb (M 1A )=(v s2 −v s1 ˜small], the following condition has to be met:

( g mb g m ) M ⁢ ⁢ 1 ⁢ ⁢ A = ( 2 R GM ) · ( 1 g m ) , where ( Eq . ⁢ 3 ) g m = 2 · I D · β · W L ( Eq ⁢ ⁢ 4 ) g mb = γ · g m 2 · - 2 ⁢ ϕ - V BS ( Eq . ⁢ 5 ) β=μ· C ox   (Eq. 6)

Here, transconductances g m and g mb are respectively the front-gate transconductance and back gate transconductance of M 1A . R GM is the load. In the equations above, μ indicates mobility, W indicates width of transistor M 1A , L indicates length of transistor M 1A , Cox, Φ and γ are already defined above.

When v sb (M 1A )=(v s2 −v s1 ) is small, (g mb ·v sb ) current source in the small signal model has almost no effect. This means the applied v ac effectively falls across R GM , making the following approximation true, where G m is the total gain of the stage.

FIG. 6 shows an example current sense circuit where the inventive concept can be applied. In FIG. 6 M 1A and M 1B are the main devices of a differential amplifier. The unconnected stubs for M 1A and M 1B are the body connections, which can be driven by the replica devices disclosed herein, and shown in FIGS. 1, 3 and 4 . In FIGS. 1, 3 and 4 , the other half of a differential pair with M 1B is not shown for simplicity and clarity, since the circuit is symmetric with respect to M 1A and M 1B .

Persons skilled in the art would appreciate that the disclosure is not limited to the example circuit shown in FIG. 6 , which is merely an example of how the bodies of M 1A and M 1B can be driven by the replica devices. There exist many other circuit topologies where the replica device idea can be used. We can use the example circuit of FIG. 6 to calculate the gain G m in Equation 7, as shown below:

ν ac =(SENSE + −SENSE − )  (Eq 8)

The gain calculation formula of Eq. 10 holds true for the circuits shown in FIGS. 1, 3 and 4 , as discussed above and shown in Equation 7, only when the input devices are driven by replica devices. Typically, without the replica devices, as the common mode voltage increases, M 1A and M 1B experience larger V SB (assuming body=ground in the absence of the replica devices). This increases the threshold voltage, as shown by Eq. 1. Also, as v sb increases, g mb decreases, as shown by Eq. 5. Therefore, without the replica devices, the approximation of Eq. 7 would not hold true because of the effect of the (g mb ·v sb ) current source that comes into play. Replica devices prevent the current source to negatively affect the gain of the input devices. Persons skilled in the art would appreciate that the voltage and current values shown in the circuit of FIG. 6 are merely non-limiting example values, and other values may be used depending on the circuit topology.

FIG. 7 shows another example circuit for demonstrating how using source resistors R S for the replica devices M 1A-R (corresponding to the first transistor M 1A of the differential pair) and M 1B-R (corresponding to the second transistor M 1B of the differential pair) helps threshold voltage tuning. The main idea is to increase the value of I S in the current source as a function of common mode DC input voltage V CM . As V CM increases, I S also increases, so drop across source resistors R S also increases. Consequently, V S1 decreases as a function of V CM . Therefore, threshold voltage of M 1A increases with V CM not just by body effect of M 1A _ R and M 1B _ R but also by drop across the source resistors R S . In the above circuit, voltages V 1 and V 2 are equivalent to the SENSE+ and SENSE− voltages shown in FIG. 6 . In an alternative embodiment, one may choose to not use R S , and only use current proportional to V CM to control V GS of M 1A _ R and M 1B _ R which increases as a function of square root of the current. A resistor divider can be used as the common mode detector with the mid-point of the resistor divider being equal to V CM .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 3 of 3

Although the present disclosure has been particularly described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that changes and modifications in the form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. It is intended that the appended claims encompass such changes and modifications.

›Tables in the description — 1
Gm
≅
1
RGM
(
Eq.
⁢7
)

Claims as granted

36 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H03K17/30
  • H03K17/16
  • H03K3/01

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2017Jul 2017Oct 2017Jan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018Oct 2018USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.5 y
565 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Kevnneth B Wells
art unit 2842 · TC 2800
Citations: 5 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20182020202220242026202820302032203420362038Owner 1Owner 2liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock