USPatent applicationPatented

Universal material tester with quick-release test probe and with reduced cross-talk between the sensors

Granted 26 Feb 2019 · no office action yet

Assignee: Rtec-Instruments, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Vishal Khosla, Gautam Char, Nick Doe, Jun Xiao +1 · Examiner: Lisa M Caputo · AU 2855 · TC 2800

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20162018202020222024202620282030203220342036ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The sensor unit of the material tester consists of a pressure-sensor unit that measures a vertical force applied to the test probe during movement of the test probe relative to the test specimen and a horizontal force sensor unit for measuring the horizontally directed friction force. The horizontal force sensor unit is made in the form of a flexible parallelogram consisting of two sensor-holding plates interconnected through flexible beams, wherein one end of the first beam is attached to the upper sensor-holding plate and the opposite end to the lower sensor-holding plate, while one end of the second beam is attached to the lower sensor-holding plate and the other to the upper one. The beams are installed with gaps relative to both plates. The quick-release test probe incorporates a soft-touch feature.

Description

8 parts
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
›Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to the field of material property testing, in particular to a tester for measuring characteristics of materials such as hardness, resistance to wear, friction forces developed during the test, etc. The invention also relates to a tester of the aforementioned type with a quick-release test probe that incorporates a soft-touch feature.

›Description of the Related Art

There exists a plurality of material testers for measuring various properties of the materials, such as hardness, friction forces that develop during mutual friction of moveable parts, resistance to wear, etc.

Irrespective of whether testers are intended for measuring mechanical properties such as hardness or for friction properties, they have to measure forces, and this requires the use of different types of strain-gauges and other devices for force measuring.

For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,918 issued in 2001 to N. Gitis, at all, describes a bidirectional force sensor for measuring two forces applied in two non-parallel directions on a friction tester. The tester has an upper rod-like probe made from the material being tested and a lower disk-like test material specimen, which performs rotary motions relative to the rod-like specimen in contact with the latter.

This sensor itself is made in the form of flexible dumbbell-shaped beam of a rectangular cross section with rigid solid end blocks at both ends for securing the sensor in the tester. The beam is provided with two through slots symmetrically cut in mutually perpendicular directions so that they are partially intersected within a body of the beam. Each slot has notches at its opposite ends which are wider than the slots so that the distance from the inner wall of the notch to the outer side surface of the beam is shorter than the distance to this surface from the inner wall of the slot. Mutually perpendicular surfaces at the ends of the beam support strain gauges. The beams are flexible in the direction of the force being measured but are rigid in the perpendicular direction. Under effect of the loading force applied to the lower material specimen from the probe and the friction force developed in the contact between the probe and the specimen, the flexible beam acts as a pair of overlapped and mutually perpendicular parallelograms.

A problem associated with the above-described tester is that the upper probe has a leverage with respect to the point of attachment of the lower specimen, i.e., with respect to its center. As a result, the loading force applied to the lower specimen via the upper probe, as well as the reaction force applied to the probe from the lower specimen, create an unbalanced momentum and deformations in the force measurement system. This leads to a distortion of measurements produced by the sensors and thus complicates interpretation of the measurement results.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,363,798 issued in 2002 to N. Gitis, at al., describes another device for measuring a loading force, which can be used for measuring, e.g., hardness and a friction force in a tribology tests. The device consists of two deformation-sensitive sensors for simultaneous equal deformation in two opposite directions for eliminating misbalance created in the measurement system when a single sensor is used. Each sensor is a deformable beam having through longitudinal slots extending in different and non-parallel directions and overlapped within the body of the beam. The sensor deforms in one direction under the effect of a loading force measured by two pairs of strain gauges located on opposite sides of the beam near one end of the beam and in another direction under the effect of a friction force measured by another two pairs of strain gauges located on opposite sides of the beam near the other end of the beam. Two sensors are sandwiched between two plates in a diagonally symmetrical positions so as to transmit forces between both plates and at the same time to ensure limited freedom of movement between both plates to allow deformations caused by the applied forces. One plate may be attached to the loading unit of the tester and another plate may support an upper sample for engagement with the lower sample of the tester.

Since this friction force is applied to a sample mounted in a long holder, this creates a significant torsional moment in the force sensor directly proportional to the magnitude of the friction force and to the length of the holder.

Furthermore, because of transverse through cuts, the flexible beams have reduced cross-sections and this, in turn, reduces the torsional stiffness of the force sensor and thus leads to significant torsional deformations of the force sensor sensitive elements. These torsional deformations could be a source of additional errors in force measurement.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a reliable and cost-effective universal material tester for measuring hardness, wear and friction properties, etc., with reduced cross-talk between the sensors. This is achieved by providing the tester with a sensor unit having the structure and the geometry of its parts that completely isolate deformations of the parts in the Z-axis direction from the deformations of the parts in the X-axis direction. As a result, it is possible to exclude cross-talks between the sensors acting in the Z-axis direction and the sensors acting in the X-axis direction. The invention also relates to a tester of the aforementioned type with a quick-release test probe that incorporates a soft-touch feature due to the provision of leaf springs in a resilient probe holder and that allows quick replacement of the test probe and probe tip for switching, e.g., from hardness test to tribology tests, or the like.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a general three-dimensional view of the universal wear and friction tester of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a side view of the sensor unit of the invention in an assembled state.

FIG. 3 is a three-dimensional view of a resilient probe holder of the invention with a test probe attached to the holder.

FIG. 4 is an exploded three-dimensional view of a sensor-holding sub-unit that constitutes a part of the sensor unit.

FIGS. 5( a ) and 5( b ) are top views of the resilient probe holder of FIG. 3 illustrating deformations of the holder in the X-axis direction under the effect of a friction force applied to the probe from the test specimen.

FIGS. 6( a ) and 6( b ) are side views of the resilient probe holder of FIG. 3 illustrating deformations of the holder in the Z-axis direction under the effect of a vertical load applied to the probe from the test specimen.

FIG. 7 is a three-dimensional view of the test probe for the tester of the invention.

FIG. 8 is a view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the probe quick-release means of the resilient probe holder.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 3

A general three-dimensional view of the universal material tester of the invention (hereinafter referred to merely as a tester), which in its entirety is designated by reference numeral 20 , is shown in FIG. 1 . In fact, the general structure of the tester of the invention with regard to the housing, specimen movement mechanisms, etc. is the same as one shown in our pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/214,623 filed on Jul. 20, 2016 by the same applicants. In other words, similar to the tester of the invention disclosed in the aforementioned patent application, along with tribology properties, the tester of the present invention may measure such characteristics of the material as hardness, etc.

The main difference is in the structure of a sensor unit 22 secured in the tester housing 24 and in a device for connection and disconnection of the test probe. More specifically, the housing 24 of the tester 20 has columns 26 a and 26 b which extend vertically and are interconnected by a horizontal crossbar 28 . The crossbar 28 is provided with an attachment unit 30 for attaching and securing a quick-release test probe 29 (hereinafter referred to simply as a “test probe 29 ”) of the sensor unit 22 .

The tester 20 is also provided with a moveable stage 32 that has drive mechanisms (not shown) in the direction of three mutually perpendicular axis X, Y, Z as shown in FIG. 1 , where the movements in the X and Y axes are used for measuring tribology properties, and the movement in the Z-axis direction is used for measuring hardness and the vertical loading force. An example of such drive mechanisms is shown and described in aforementioned pending patent application of the same applicants.

Reference numeral 34 designates a specimen which is secured to the upper surface of the moveable stage 32 and which is brought into contact with the test probe 29 secured above the moveable stage 32 in the attachment unit 30 . The upper part of the tester 20 , and hence the probe 29 , is stationary, and contact of the test specimen 34 with the test probe 29 is provided by moving the moveable stage 32 in the Z-axis direction. The probe 29 may be made from a material the same as or different from the material of the test specimen 34 , or may have a replaceable tip for measuring hardness.

Having described the structure of the housing and movements pertaining to the tester 20 in general, let us consider now the main unique unit of the present invention, i.e., the sensor unit 22 , which is shown in FIGS. 2, 3, and 4 , wherein FIG. 2 is a side view of the sensor unit 22 , FIG. 3 is a three-dimensional view of a resilient probe holder 36 with the test probe 29 , and FIG. 4 is an exploded three-dimensional view of a horizontal-axis sensor-holding sub-unit 38 , herein after referred to as a X-axis sensor-holding sub-unit 38 of the sensor unit 22 .

As shown in FIG. 2 , the upper side of the X-axis sensor-holding sub-unit 38 is attached to an adapter plate 40 used for securing the sensor unit 22 to the attachment unit 30 ( FIG. 1 ), and the lower side of the X-axis sensor-holding sub-unit 38 holds the resilient probe holder 36 .

The resilient probe holder 36 consists of a probe-holder upper plate 42 and a probe-holder lower plate 44 having dimensions smaller than the probe-holder upper plate 42 . The probe-holder upper plate 42 and the probe-holder lower plate 44 are spaced from each other in a vertical direction by inner spacers 46 a and 46 b.

Attached to the ends of the probe-holder upper plate 42 are outer spacers 48 a and 48 b that are located outward from the inner spacers 46 a and 46 b and hang downward from the probe-holder upper plate 42 so that they are horizontally aligned with the inner spacers 46 a and 46 b.

The inner and upper spacers 446 a , 46 b and 48 a , 48 b , respectively, are interconnected by leaf springs 50 a , 50 b , 50 c , 50 d , 50 e , 50 f , 50 g , and 50 h , respectively ( FIG. 3 ). In such a construction, the probe-holder upper plate 42 is stationary, while the probe-holder lower plate 44 that rigidly holds the test probe 29 is resiliently secured relative to the probe-holder upper plate 42 and may perform resilient vertical movement in the direction of the Z-axis together with the test probe 29 attached to this plate.

As can be seen from the exploded view of FIG. 4 , the sensor-holding sub-unit 38 contains an upper sensor-holding plate 38 a and a lower sensor-holding plate 38 b . Each sensor-holding plate has rigid blocks at two diametrically opposite corners firmly attached to the respective sensor-holding plates. Thus, the upper sensor-holding plate 38 a has a rigid block 38 a 1 (shown by broken lines in FIG. 4 ) and a diametrically opposite rigid block 38 a 2 . On the other hand, the lower sensor-holding plate 38 b has a rigid block 38 b 1 and a diametrically opposite rigid block 38 b 2 . Attached to the inward facing surface of the block 38 a 1 is a flexible beam 38 c 1 that in the illustrated embodiment extends parallel to the side 38 a ′ of the plate 38 a , i.e., to the axis X (see FIG. 1 ). Similarly, attached to the inward facing surface of the block 38 b 1 is a flexible beam 38 c 2 that in the illustrated embodiment extends parallel to the side 38 b ′ of the plate 38 b , i.e., to the axis X (see FIG. 1 ).

In an assembled state of the sensor-holding sub-unit 38 shown in FIG. 2 , the flexible beam 38 c 1 is spaced from the surface of the upper sensor-holding plate 38 a with the gap G 1 ( FIG. 2 ), and flexible beam 38 c 2 is spaced from the surface of the lower sensor-holding plate 38 b with the gap G 2 , which is equal to the gap G 1 . In fact, both flexible beams are spaced from both upper and lower plates so that the plates and beam together form a flexible parallelogram with the upper plate 38 a and the lower plate 38 b flexibly moveable coplanar to each other when the flexible beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 are resiliently deformed.

In other words, the rigid blocks 38 a 1 , 38 a 2 , 38 b 1 , and 38 b 2 function as spacers that space the upper sensor-holding plate 38 a and the lower sensor-holding plate 38 b parallel to each other and at a certain distance from each other, while the flexible beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 function like elastic or flexible members that allow the plates to shift coplanar to each other in the horizontal plane under the effect of a friction force F (see FIG. 1 ) that is developed during reciprocations of the test specimen 34 relative to the test probe 29 , in the illustrated case, in the direction of the axis X, or under effect of a tangentially directed friction force (not shown) when the test specimen 34 performs rotary motion relative to the test probe 29 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 3

It also should be noted that the rigid blocks 38 a 1 , 38 a 2 , 38 b 1 , and 38 b 2 and the respective flexible beams of the upper and lower sensor-holding plates 38 a and 38 b have an oppositely symmetric arrangement.

As shown in FIGS. 5( a ) and 5( b ) , in the illustrated embodiment, the upper and lower sensor-holding plates 38 a and 38 b have freedom of movements only in X-axis direction and are restrained from the movements in the Y-axis direction. FIG. 5( a ) shows positions of the plates 38 a and 38 b and the deformed flexible beams C 1 and C 2 (drawn by broken lines) when the plates are shifted in one direction, and FIG. 5( b ) shows positions of the plates 38 a and 38 b and the deformed flexible beams C 1 and C 2 (drawn by broken lines) when the plates are shifted in the opposite direction.

Mobility of the sensor unit 22 in the Z-axis direction relative to the attachment unit 30 is provided by leaf springs 50 a , 50 b , 50 c , 50 d , 50 e , 50 f , 50 g , and 50 h , shown in FIG. 3 , and the deformation pattern in the Z-axis direction is shown in FIGS. 6( a ) and 6( b ) . These drawings show two different positions of the test probe 29 relative to the specimen 34 . The force F, shown in FIG. 6( b ) designates not only the vertical loading force but also the force used for determining hardness of the material in case hardness measurement when the driven in the direction of X or Y axis is stopped and the moveable stage 32 ( FIG. 1 ) with the test specimen is moveable against the test probe that holds an appropriate hardness-testing tip 29 - 2 . In the hardness test the leaf springs 50 a , 50 b , 50 c , 50 d , 50 e , 50 f , 50 g , and 50 h provide smooth gradual development of the force applied to the specimen. This feature contributes to better accuracy of measurement.

In FIG. 2 reference numerals 52 a , 52 b , 52 c , and 52 d designate pressure sensitive members which are deformed under the effect of a compression force and which support respective pressure sensors 52 a - 1 , 52 b - 1 , and two other similar sensors which cannot be seen since they are located on the rear sides of the pressure sensitive members 52 c , and 52 d . In hardness test the data from the pressure sensors are used for determination of hardness.

Thus, the adapter plate 40 , the upper sensor-holding plates 38 a , and pressure sensitive members 52 a , 52 b , 52 c , and 52 d form a pressure-sensor holding unit 53 .

When the sensor unit 22 moves in the Z-axis direction relative to the attachment unit 30 , as shown in FIGS. 6( a ) and 6( b ) , the aforementioned sensors 52 a - 1 , 52 b - 1 , etc. of the pressure-sensor holding unit measure a force acting in the Z-axis direction. Such pressure sensors can be represented by tension sensors, film piezo sensors, or the like and can be pasted to the deformable surfaces in a manner known in the art. The number and arrangement of the sensors may vary but for convenience of operation and calibration it is recommended that the of the sensors on the pressure sensitive members 52 a , 52 b , and 52 c , 52 d be arranged symmetrically opposite to each other.

In the illustrated embodiment, the sensor unit 22 has a structure which is deformable under the effect of the friction force between the specimen 34 and the tip of the probe 29 only in one horizontal direction, e.g., in the X-axis direction and is resistance to deformations in the Y-axis direction. In fact, the principle of the invention allows to measure the forces in both X and Y-axes directions by providing the sensor unit 22 with another pair of the upper and lower sensor-holding plates but with arrangement of flexible beams shifted 90° relative to the flexible beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 ( FIG. 4 ).

Referring back to FIG. 4 , it can be seen that the flexible beam 38 c 1 supports a sensor 38 c 1 - 1 , and the flexible beam 38 c 2 supports a sensor 38 c 2 - 1 . When during the test a horizontal friction force F is developed in the X-axis direction between the specimen 34 and the tip of the probe 29 ( FIG. 1 ), this force deforms the flexile beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 as shown in FIG. 5( a ) and FIG. 5( b ) and thus activates the sensors 38 c 1 - 1 and 38 c 2 - 1 ( FIG. 4 ).

Similar to the pressure sensors of FIG. 2 , the sensors 38 c 1 - 1 and 38 c 2 - 1 can be represented by tension sensors, film piezo sensors, or the like and can be pasted to the deformable surfaces by a manner known in the art. The number and arrangement of the sensors may vary but for convenience of operation and calibration it is recommended that the sensors on the flexible beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 be arranged symmetrically opposite to each other.

It should be understood that the term “flexible” is applied to the beams 38 c 1 and 38 c 2 just to show that these beams possess a certain flexibility in the X-axis direction but the magnitude of bending deformation is extremely small in comparison to the cross-sectional area of the beam.

The sensors may be combined into two-dimensional load cells. One such cell (not shown) may contain two or four strain gauges for X-axis measurements and one such cell may contain two or four strain gauges for Z-axis measurements. The strain gauge signals may be converted to voltages by respective amplifiers (not shown) to provide X and a Z load signals. The signals are shown in the screen of a display as bar graphs or similar.

Thus, it has been shown that the structure of the sensor unit 22 and the geometry of its parts proposed by the present invention make it possible to completely isolate deformations of the parts in the Z-axis direction from the deformations of the parts in the X-axis direction. As a result, it is possible to exclude cross-talks between the sensors acting in the Z-axis direction and the sensors acting in the X-axis direction.

In addition to the characteristics described above, the structure of the resilient probe holder 36 imparts to the probe soft-touch and quick-release features. This is shown in FIGS. 7 and 8 , wherein FIG. 7 is a three-dimensional view of the test probe 29 , and FIG. 8 is a view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the probe quick-release means of the resilient probe holder 36 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 3 of 3

More specifically, the probe 29 has a shaft portion 29 - 1 with a replaceable tip portion 29 - 2 on one end and a tapered tail portion 29 - 3 with a flange 29 - 4 between the tail portion 29 - 3 and the shaft portion 29 - 1 . The tail-facing side of the flange is coated with a layer 29 - 5 of a magnetic or easily magnetized material (hereinafter referred to as a “magnetized material layer”). The replaceable tip 29 - 2 may be provided with a hardness-measuring ball for measuring Brinell hardness, with a diamond pin for measuring Rockwell hardness, or the like.

On the other hand, a magnet 44 - 1 with a central opening 44 - 2 is attached to the lower side of the lower plate 44 , e.g., by screws 44 - 3 a , 44 - 3 b , and a hollow tapered probe tail receiver 44 - 4 made from a magnetic or magnetized material is inserted through the aforementioned opening 44 - 2 so that the tapered portion protrudes upward from the surface of the lower plate 44 . At its lower end, the hollow tapered probe tail receiver 44 - 4 has a flange for attachment of the hollow probe tail receiver 44 - 4 to the magnet 44 - 1 .

The cavity 44 - 4 - 1 of the probe tail receiver 44 - 4 has the same taper angle as the tail portion 29 - 3 of the probe and is intended for receiving the latter.

The magnet 44 - 1 develops a sufficient magnetic attraction force to firmly hold the flange portion 29 - 5 of the probe but at the same time to allow easy manual retraction, i.e., quick disconnection of the probe from the resilient probe holder 36 .

The provision of leaf springs 50 a , 50 b , 50 c , 50 d , 50 e , 50 f , 50 g , and 50 h ( FIG. 3 ) imparts elastic mobility to the resilient probe holder 29 and thus a soft touch at contact of the tip of the probe 29 - 2 with the test specimen.

The invention has been described in detail with reference to specific examples and illustrated with reference to specific drawings. It should be noted, however, that these descriptions and drawings should not be construed as limiting the application of the invention and that any changes and modifications are possible within the scope of the attached patent claims. For example, sensors of types other than those described can be used and their arrangement also can be changed. The specimen can be driven in the Y-axis direction and in that case the friction force will be measured in the Y-axis directions. Alternatively, the structure may be two-layered with two sensor units shifted 90° with respect to each other.

Claims as granted

17 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01N3/40
  • G01N19/02
  • G01N3/56

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2016Oct 2016Jan 2017Apr 2017Jul 2017Oct 2017Jan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018Oct 2018Jan 2019Apr 2019USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.5 y
904 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Lisa M Caputo
art unit 2855 · TC 2800
Citations: 9 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

No assignments have been recorded for this application yet.