USPatent applicationPatented

Optical system and imaging system

Granted 4 Sep 2018 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Ricoh Company, Ltd.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Hiroyuki Satoh, Seiya Amano · Examiner: Thomas K Pham · AU 2872 · TC 2800

Life of the application

16 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20162018202020222024202620282030203220342036ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An optical system, which may include a fish-eye lens including a whole view angle larger than 180 degrees, includes in order from an object-side to an imaging-side, a first lens group including a negative focal distance, an aperture, and a second lens group including a positive focal distance. An infrared cutting coat is coated on a lens surface that includes curvature of a lens among lenses included in the second lens group.

Description

7 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-051247, filed Mar. 13, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

›BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

I. Field

The present disclosure relates to an optical system and an imaging system.

II. Description of the Related Art

There is a need for optical elements which cut Infrared (hereinafter referred to as ‘IR’) in optical systems for imaging apparatuses such as general cameras. This is because IR included in components of sun light and so on affects an influence of image deterioration and so on to a captured image. For this reason, generally, an IR cut filter (hereinafter referred to as ‘IRCF’) is disposed in front of the image so that transmission of IR is inhibited.

Though it is possible to cut infrared by the IRCF such as described above, an occurrence of a ghost becomes a problem due to the IRCF. Also, as an IR cut coat (hereinafter referred to as ‘IRCC’) which cuts IR, there is a method for coating the IRCC to a lens surface of a lens between a foreground of an optical system and an image surface of an image sensor. But, there is a problem that a reflection property of the coat is changed by unevenness at a central part and a surrounding part of the lens surface in the case of coating the IRCC on a lens surface having curvature.

For reducing the occurrence of the ghost, a technology that the IRCC is coated on a side of an emission surface of a prism has been known. This technology has a good IR cut function and attempts to inhibit the occurrence of the ghost due to the IR cut structure. (Refer to Japanese Patent Application Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-017837). However, the technology discloses that the IRCC is coated on the prism surface which is on special optical elements. Therefore, there is a problem to attempt to fully inhibit the occurrence of the ghost.

›SUMMARY

The present disclosure is advanced in consideration of solving the above problems. A purpose is to thus provide an optical system and an imaging system that inhibit an influence of a change in a coat reflection property due to a coat unevenness of the IRCC on a lens surface having curvature.

To solve the above problems and achieve the purpose, the present disclosure provides an optical system including a fish-eye lens including a whole view angle larger than 180 degrees, and including in order from an object-side to an imaging-side, a first lens group including a negative focal distance, an aperture, and a second lens group including a positive focal distance. An infrared cutting coat is coated on a lens surface that includes curvature of a lens among lenses included in the second lens group.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide further understanding of the present disclosure, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the specification, serve to explain the principles of this application.

FIG. 1 is a general arrangement of an imaging system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a property graph of an IRCC which an example is illustrated according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a figure which schematically describes a principle of a ghost occurring according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 3

Embodiments of an optical system and an imaging system of the present disclosure are described below and by referring to the figures. Also, the present disclosure is not limited by the embodiments below, and structure components of the embodiments below include what a skilled person would conceive of what is practically the same, as well as a so-called range of equivalents. Further, without departing from the scope of the embodiments described below, a kind of abridgement, replacement, and change of the structure components can be conducted.

The present disclosure can lead to inhibit an influence of a change in a coat reflection property due to a coat unevenness of the IRCC on a lens surface having curvature.

(A General Arrangement of an Imaging System)

FIG. 1 is a general arrangement of an imaging system 1 which is an illustrative embodiment. By referring FIG. 1 , the overall structure of the imaging system 1 is described according to the embodiment.

The imaging system 1 according to the embodiment includes an optical system 10 , a cover glass CG, and an image sensor IS (imaging element) such as illustrated by FIG. 1 . The optical system 10 is a wide-lens which is called a fish-eye lens. The optical system 10 corresponds to a view angle larger than 180 degrees and selects an equidistant projection. The equidistant projection is a method having a relation γ=f·θ in the case of an image height (a height of an image inside a captured image that is captured by the image sensor IS) as γ, a focal distance of the optical system 10 as f, and a half view angle as θ. The optical system 10 is made of a front group 2 (a first lens group), an aperture 4 , and a back group 3 (a second lens group). The imaging system 1 includes the front group 2 , the aperture 4 , the back group 3 , the cover glass CG, and the image sensor IS, in an order from an object-side to an imaging-side, side by side in series.

The front group 2 is a lens group which is disposed at the object-side of the optical system 10 . The front group 2 includes a totally negative refractive power, a negative focal distance, and a function which takes a ray of light of a view angle larger than 180 degrees. The front group 2 includes a lens L 1 , a lens L 2 , and a plane parallel plate PP, in an order from the object-side to the imaging-side, side by side in series.

The aperture 4 is an opening aperture which freely adjusts an amount of incident light to the front group 2 . The aperture 4 is disposed adjacent to an object-side-surface (a surface L 3 R 1 ) of a lens L 3 which is described later.

The back group 3 is a lens group which is disposed at the imaging-side of the optical system 10 . The back group 3 includes a totally positive refractive power, a positive focal distance, and a function which corrects aberration of mainly the captured image. The back group 3 is made of a lens L 3 , a lens L 4 , a lens L 5 , a lens L 6 , and a lens L 7 , in an order from the object-side to the imaging-side, side by side in series.

The cover glass CG is a cover element protecting the image IS sensor which is disposed at the imaging-side. The image sensor IS is a solid state image sensor which generates images by converting incident light into the optical system 10 to an electronic signal and capturing objects. The image sensor IS is realized by, for example, a CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) sensor or a CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) sensor, and so on.

One example of a structure overview of the structure of each optical element which is described above is illustrated by the Table 1 below.

As illustrated in the Table 1, the lens L 1 is a spherical meniscus lens on both sides of the lens L 1 , which is made of glass material. The lens L 2 is an aspherical meniscus lens on both sides of the lens L 2 , which is made of glass material. The plane parallel plate PP has optical elements including a vertical and parallel plane to an optical axis and a refractive index of glass material.

The lens L 3 is a spherical biconvex lens on both sides of the lens L 3 , which is made of glass material. The lens IA is an aspherical biconvex lens on both sides of the lens L 4 , which is made of glass material. The lens L 5 is a spherical biconvex lens on both sides of the lens L 5 , which is made of glass material. The lens L 6 is a spherical biconcave lens on both sides of the lens L 6 , which is made of glass material. The lens L 5 and the lens L 6 form a cemented lens pasted together at surfaces (i.e. pasted between surface L 5 R 2 and surface L 6 R 1 , which are describe later). The lens L 7 is an aspherical biconvex lens on both sides of the lens L 7 , which is made of glass material.

The lenses L 1 . L 2 , the plane parallel plate PP, and the lenses L 3 to L 7 , which are describe above and illustrated by FIG. 1 , are disposed on an optical axis OA corresponding to each optical axis, side by side in series. The lens surfaces of the lenses L 1 to L 7 on the object-side, such as illustrated by FIG. 1 , are surfaces L 1 R 1 , L 2 R 1 , L 3 R 1 , L 4 R 1 , L 5 R 1 , L 6 R 1 , and L 7 R 1 , respectively. Also, the lens surfaces of the lenses L 1 to L 7 on the imaging-side, such as illustrated by FIG. 1 , are surfaces L 1 R 2 , L 2 R 2 , L 3 R 2 , L 4 R 2 , L 5 R 2 , L 6 R 2 , and L 7 R 2 , respectively.

The surface of the plane parallel plate PP and the surface of the cover glass CG on the object-side, such as illustrated by FIG. 1 , are a surface PPR 1 and a surface CGR 1 , respectively. Also, the surface of the plane parallel plate PP and the surface of the cover glass CG on the imaging-side, such as illustrated by FIG. 1 , are a surface PPR 2 and a surface CGR 2 , respectively.

As illustrated by Table 1, an AR (Anti Reflective) coat is applied on the surfaces of L 1 R 1 , L 2 R 1 , PPR 1 , PPR 2 , L 3 R 1 , L 3 R 2 , L 4 R 1 , L 4 R 2 , L 5 R 1 , L 6 R 2 , L 7 R 1 , and L 7 R 2 . Here, the AR coat is a general low reflection coat.

A WAR (Wide Anti Reflective) coat is applied on the surface L 1 R 2 and L 2 R 2 . Here, the WAR coat is a low reflection coat which can inhibit reflectance at a wider wavelength region than the general AR coat.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 3

According to an embodiment, in the optical system 10 , the IRCC for cutting IR is coated on the surface L 3 R 1 . A function of the IRCC coated on the surface L 3 R 1 is described later.

Next, one example of design data (lens data) about each optical element described above is illustrated in Table 2 below.

The surface numbers ‘1’ to ‘6’ and ‘8’ to ‘18’ in Table 2 respectively correspond to surfaces L 1 R 1 , L 1 R 2 , L 2 R 1 , L 2 R 2 , PPR 1 , PPR 2 , L 3 R 1 , L 3 R 2 , L 4 R 1 , L 4 R 2 , L 5 R 1 , L 6 R 1 -L 5 R 2 , L 6 R 2 , L 7 R 1 , L 7 R 2 , CGR 1 , and CGR 2 , which are illustrated by FIG. 1 . The curvature radius corresponding to a type of ‘aspherical’ lens illustrates a paraxial curvature radius. Also, the refractive index illustrates a refractive index taken at the sodium D line. In Table 2, units having a length dimension are in [mm].

(IRCC Function of the Present Embodiment)

FIG. 2 is a property graph of the IRCC of which an example is illustrated. FIG. 3 is a figure which schematically describes a principle of the ghost occurring. While referring to FIGS. 2 and 3 , a function of the IRCC coated on the surface L 3 R 1 is described.

The property of reflectance of the IRCC is illustrated in FIG. 2 . As illustrated by FIG. 2 , IR is cut by enhancing the reflectance of the IRCC with respect to light of a wavelength that is about 650 [nm]. Light of a wavelength near a half value with respect to the reflectance of the IRCC is the light of the wavelength that is about 650 [nm]. Neither transmittance nor reflectance of the light of the wavelength that is about 650 [nm] is a noticeable value. This is why there is a high possibility that IR transmitted through the IRCF reflects by optical elements on the imaging-side, and the reflected light reflects by the IRCF. Thus, there is a high possibility that the ghost occurs. The ghost may occur in the case of a general optical system. In particular, there is a high possibility that the ghost occurs in the case of using the wide-lens called the fish-eye lens, which includes a view angle larger than 180 degrees. This is why incident sun light inside a view angle in the wide-lens often occurs. Therefore, the occurrence of the ghost especially becomes noticeable. Here, the ghost is a phenomenon which occurs in an image on a pixel of an image sensor to which light should not converge. This occurs in the case that a ray of light of high strength, such as sun light and so on, is incident to the optical system, and repeatedly reflects between lens surfaces of the lenses of the optical system.

For inhibiting the occurrence of the ghost such as described above, according to an embodiment of the optical system 10 , the IRCC is coated on the surface L 3 R 1 by vapor deposition. Here, while referring to FIG. 3 , the principal occurring ghost is described in a simplified manner. As illustrated by FIG. 3 , a ray of light 30 incident to the optical system 10 of the imaging system 1 passes the front group 2 and the aperture 4 , a part (mainly light of the visible light region) passes by the IRCC coated on the surface L 3 R 1 of the lens L 3 , and reaches the cover glass CG. There is a part of light that transmits through the cover glass CG and reaches the image sensor IS of the light that reaches the cover glass CG. Pixels which image this light reaching the image sensor IS are the pixels of the image sensor IS to which the ray of light 30 should originally converge. But, a part of the light reaching the cover glass CG is reflected by the surface (surface CGR 1 ) of the cover glass CG on the object-side, faces toward the object-side, and reaches the surface L 3 R 1 again. And, a part of the light reaching the surface L 3 R 1 is reflected again, faces toward the imaging-side, and reaches the image sensor IS. At this time, the pixels which image this light reaching the image sensor IS are different pixels from those to which the ray of light 30 should originally converge. Thus, the ghost occurs. In the above example, an example of the reflected light on the cover glass CG has been described, but reflected light on the other optical system elements (each lens and plane parallel plate PP) included in the optical system 10 may also occur.

Generally, a filter having an IR cut function (IRCF) or the IR coat (IRCC) is often disposed adjacent to the image sensor. But, by disposing the IRCF or the IRCC of high reflectance at a position adjacent to the image sensor, an occurrence of a high strength ghost is very probable. Therefore, it is not better to dispose the IRCF and the IRCC adjacent to the image sensor IS of the imaging system 1 .

Further, as a disposed position of the IRCF and the IRCC which can most inhibit the occurrence of the ghost, a foreground of the optical system (the surface L 1 R 1 in the optical system 10 illustrated in FIG. 1 ) is considered. But, in the case of arranging the IRCF or the IRCC at the foreground of the optical system, there is a problem which is possible that a good IR cut function is lost due to a big change in a property of the IR cut by the total optical system, an adhesion of dirt, and so on. Therefore, arranging the IRCF and the IRCC at the surface L 1 R which is the foreground of the optical system 10 is also not good.

Therefore, the optical system 10 of the present embodiment includes, as described above, coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 by vapor deposition. Strength examples of the ghost by forming the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 are illustrated below in Table 3. With respect to incident angles of 10, 30, 60, and 80 [degrees] at the optical system 10 , a maximum strength of the occurring ghost in the case of an incident ray of light is illustrated in the Table 3. In detail, the Table 3 illustrates the maximum value of the strength of the ghost contributed by the ray of light from a surface B in the case that the incident ray of light into the optical system 10 reflects at a surface A, and the reflected light is reflected further at the surface B. The bigger the value is the stronger the ghost that occurs on the captured image of the image sensor. As illustrated by Table 3, light reflected at the surface L 3 R 1 and the light respectively reflected again at the surfaces LR 1 , L 1 R 2 , L 2 R, and L 2 R 2 , ‘plane parallel plate R 1 ’ (i.e. the surface PPR 1 ), and ‘plane parallel plate R 2 ’ (i.e. the surface PPR 2 ) do not include a bad ghost strength reaching the image sensor IS.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS · 3 of 3

As illustrated by the above Table 3, in the optical system 10 of the present embodiment, by coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 , the occurrence of the ghost is inhibited. In particular, in the optical system 10 that includes a fish-eye lens having a view angle larger than 180 degrees, the ghost inhibition effect is noticeable.

The IRCC coated on the surface L 3 R 1 is disposed adjacent to and behind the aperture 4 (toward the imaging-side). The aperture 4 is disposed such that a principal ray on the optical axis OA (hereinafter referred to as ‘on the axis’) and a principal ray out of the optical axis OA (hereinafter referred to as ‘out of the axis’) are crossed at a center of this opening aperture. Therefore, the light passing the aperture 4 becomes a converged light flux by coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 , and spreading of the ray of light passing the IRCC can be inhibited. Thus, an influence of a change in a coat reflection property can become a minimum even though the IRCC coated on the surface L 3 R 1 has coat unevenness.

Coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 forms the IRCC (referring to the Table 2) on the lens group of the imaging-side with respect to the aperture 4 , in other words, on a surface which includes a largest curvature radius of the lens surfaces of the lenses included in the back group 3 . Generally, in the case that the IRCC is coated on a lens surface having curvature, there is coat unevenness between a central part and a surrounding part of the lens surface, and a coat reflection property changes. In particular, the smaller the curvature radius becomes, the larger the curvature becomes. A large variation of the coat reflection property between the central part and the surrounding part of the lens surface on which the IRCC is coated on is very probable. Changing the coat reflection property, for example, by shifting a wavelength for which reflectance rises is given. But, in the optical system 10 of the present embodiment, variation of the coat reflection property of the IRCC can be inhibited to a minimum because the IRCC is formed on the surface with the largest curvature radius of the lens surfaces of the lenses included in the back group 3 .

Further, coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 forms the IRCC on a surface of spherical convex shape (referring to the Table 1 and the Table 2). For example, in the case of forming the IRCC on an aspherical lens surface by vapor deposition and so on, due to the aspherical surface, coat unevenness of the IRCC coated is invited, and changing the coat reflection property is very probable, as well as what is described above. But, in the optical system 10 of the present embodiment, because the IRCC is formed on the surface of the spherical convex shape, coat unevenness of the IRCC can be inhibited.

As discussed above, it is possible by coating the IRCC on the surface L 3 R 1 to inhibit the influence of the change in the coat reflection property due to coat unevenness of the IRCC on a lens surface having curvature.

Further, according to an embodiment, the optical system 10 includes a fish-eye lens, but this is not limiting. In another example, by applying the structures which are described above to an optical system that does not include a fish-eye lens, the advantageous effects which are described above are also acquired.

›Tables in the description — 3
TABLE 1 — Lenses plane parallel
L1L2plateL3L4L5L6L7CG
Materialglassglassglassglassglassglassglassglassglass
Shapesphericalaspherical—sphericalasphericalsphericalsphericalaspherical—
meniscusmeniscusbiconvexbiconvexbiconvexbiconcavebiconvex
CoatARWARARWARARARIRCCARARARAR——ARARAR
TABLE 2
SurfaceCurvatureRefractiveAbbe
numberTyperadiusThicknessindexnumber
1spherical17.081.21.88299740.76511
2spherical6.192.7
3aspherical26.30.81.88202337.2213
4aspherical3.264.23
5—Infinity51.83437.16049
6—Infinity1.54
Aperture—Infinity0
8spherical12.211.8466623.77794
9spherical−21.460.51
10aspherical9.851.231.693553.20078
11aspherical−11.580.35
12spherical6.5721.74400244.71997
13spherical−3.640.741.94594517.98425
14spherical3.690.36
15aspherical4.431.871.5891361.25089
16aspherical−7.460.9
17—Infinity0.51.5163364.14202
18—Infinity0.5
TABLE 3 — the maximum ghost strength:
Surface ASurface Bincident angle (10, 30, 60, 80)
L3R1L1R1Not bad ghost strength
reaching the image sensor
L3R1L1R2Not bad ghost strength
reaching the image sensor
L3R1L2R1Not bad ghost strength
reaching the image sensor
L3R1L2R2Not bad ghost strength
reaching the image sensor
L3R1plane parallelNot bad ghost strength
plate R1reaching the image sensor
L3R1plane parallelNot bad ghost strength
plate R2reaching the image sensor
L3R2L3R17.4131E−08
L4R1L3R11.44544E−07
L4R2L3R19.54993E−08
L5R1L3R18.31764E−08
L6R1L3R13.98107E−05
L6R2L3R11.12202E−07
L7R1L3R19.12011E−08
L7R2L3R11.44544E−07
CGR1L3R13.01995E−06
CGR2L3R12.81838E−06
ISL3R11.7378E−06

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G02B13/06
  • G06K7/10
  • G02B27/00
  • G02B5/20

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2016Jul 2016Oct 2016Jan 2017Apr 2017Jul 2017Oct 2017Jan 2018Apr 2018Jul 2018Oct 2018USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after finalNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.5 y
907 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
3
1 RCE
Examiner
Thomas K Pham
art unit 2872 · TC 2800
Citations: 24 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20162018202020222024202620282030203220342036Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock