USPatent applicationPatented

Microbicidal composition

Granted 13 Mar 2018 · 3 office actions

Current assignee: Dow Global Technologies Llc · originally DuPont

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Bei Yin, Christine McInnis, Usha Gandhi, Paul O. Schook +3 · Examiner: Sarah Pihonak · AU 1627 · TC 1600

Life of the application

17 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Description

9 parts
›This invention relates to microbicidal compositions containing 2-decylthioethylamine…

This invention relates to microbicidal compositions containing 2-decylthioethylamine and a surfactant.

A composition containing 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazolin-3-one, 2-methylisothiazolin-3-one and a nonionic dispersant is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,295,932. The composition contains a 3:1 mixture of 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methylisothiazolin-3-one, and a copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide which appears to have the same composition as PLURONIC L61 or TERGITOL L61 dispersant. However, there is a need for combinations of microbicides having synergistic activity against various strains of microorganisms to provide effective control of the microorganisms. Moreover, there is a need for such combinations containing lower levels of individual microbicides for environmental and economic benefit. The problem addressed by this invention is to provide such synergistic combinations of microbicides.

›STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a synergistic microbicidal composition comprising: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 1 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 5 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 9 H

where R 1 is a C 8 alkyl group; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.004 to 1:0.0137 or 1:0.016 to 1:0.4571.

The present invention is further directed to a synergistic microbicidal composition comprising: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 7 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.0023 to 1:0.4571.

The present invention is further directed to a synergistic microbicidal composition comprising: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 5 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.0023 to 1:0.3657.

The present invention is further directed to methods for inhibiting the growth of microorganisms in aqueous media by adding to an aqueous medium a nonionic surfactant as described herein and 2-decylthioethylamine in the ratios described herein.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

“DTEA” is 2-decylthioethylamine, CAS No. 29873-30-1, or its salts. DTEA may be present in the form of a salt, especially the hydrochloride salt; ratios and amounts stated herein including 2-decylthioethylamine are based on the hydrochloride salt. As used herein, the following terms have the designated definitions, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “microbicide” refers to a compound capable of inhibiting the growth of or controlling the growth of microorganisms; microbicides include bactericides, fungicides and algaecides. The term “microorganism” includes, for example, fungi (such as yeast and mold), bacteria and algae. The following abbreviations are used throughout the specification: ppm=parts per million by weight (weight/weight), mL=milliliter. Unless otherwise specified, temperatures are in degrees centigrade (° C.), references to percentages are percentages by weight (wt %) and amounts and ratios are on an active ingredient basis, i.e., total weight of DTEA and the nonionic surfactant. Numbers of polymerized units of propylene oxide or ethylene oxide are number averages.

Preferably, the weight ratio of the nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 1 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 5 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 9 H

where R 1 is a C 8 alkyl group to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.016 to 1:0.4571, preferably from 1:0.032 to 1:0.4571. Preferably, the weight ratio of the nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 7 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.01 to 1:0.4571. Preferably, the weight ratio of the nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 7 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.02 to 1:0.3657, preferably from 1:0.0343 to 1:0.3657.

The present invention is further directed to a method for inhibiting the growth of mold, preferably A. niger , in an aqueous medium by adding: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 7 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.01 to 1:0.4571.

The present invention is further directed to a method for inhibiting the growth of mold, preferably A. niger , in an aqueous medium by adding: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 1 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 5 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 9 H

where R 1 is a C 8 alkyl group; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.032 to 1:0.4571.

The present invention is further directed to a method for inhibiting the growth of mold, preferably A. niger , in an aqueous medium by adding: (a) a nonionic surfactant with structure:

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 5 H

where R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups; and (b) 2-decylthioethylamine; wherein a weight ratio of said nonionic surfactant to 2-decylthioethylamine is from 1:0.02 to 1:0.3657, preferably from 1:0.0343 to 1:0.3657.

R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups. Preferably, the C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups comprise from 50 to 85 wt % C 8 -C 10 linear alkyl groups and 15 to 50 wt % C 12 -C 14 linear alkyl groups, preferably from 60 to 75 wt % C 8 -C 10 linear alkyl groups and 25 to 40 wt % C 12 -C 14 linear alkyl groups, preferably about 70 wt % C 8 -C 10 linear alkyl groups and about 30 wt % C 12 -C 14 linear alkyl groups. Preferably, the linear alkyl groups are derived from seed oil. Preferably, R 1 is 2-ethylhexyl.

Preferably, each of the compositions is substantially free of microbicides other than the nonionic surfactant and DTEA, i.e., it has less than 1 wt % of microbicides other than the nonionic surfactant and DTEA based on total weight of active ingredients, preferably less than 0.5 wt %, preferably less than 0.2 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt %. Preferably, when the nonionic surfactant and DTEA are added to an aqueous medium, the medium is substantially free of other microbicides, i.e., it has less than 1 wt % of microbicides other than the nonionic surfactant and DTEA based on total weight of active ingredients, preferably less than 0.5 wt %, preferably less than 0.2 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt %.

The compositions of this invention may contain other ingredients, e.g., defoamers and emulsifiers. The microbicidal compositions of the present invention can be used to inhibit the growth of microorganisms or higher forms of aquatic life (such as protozoans, invertebrates, bryozoans, dinoflagellates, crustaceans, mollusks, etc) by introducing a microbicidally effective amount of the compositions into an aqueous medium subject to microbial attack. Suitable aqueous media are found in, for example: industrial process water; electrocoat deposition systems; cooling towers; air washers; gas scrubbers; mineral slurries; wastewater treatment; ornamental fountains; reverse osmosis filtration; ultrafiltration; ballast water; evaporative condensers; heat exchangers; pulp and paper processing fluids and additives; starch; plastics; emulsions; dispersions; paints; latices; coatings, such as varnishes; construction products, such as mastics, caulks, and sealants; construction adhesives, such as ceramic adhesives, carpet backing adhesives, and laminating adhesives; industrial or consumer adhesives; photographic chemicals; printing fluids; household products, such as bathroom and kitchen cleaners; cosmetics; toiletries; shampoos; soaps; personal care products such as wipes, lotions, sunscreen, conditioners, creams, and other leave-on applications; detergents; industrial cleaners; floor polishes; laundry rinse water; metalworking fluids; conveyor lubricants; hydraulic fluids; leather and leather products; textiles; textile products; wood and wood products, such as plywood, chipboard, flakeboard, laminated beams, oriented strandboard, hardboard, and particleboard; petroleum processing fluids; fuel; oilfield fluids, such as injection water, fracture fluids, and drilling muds; agriculture adjuvant preservation; surfactant preservation; medical devices; diagnostic reagent preservation; food preservation, such as plastic or paper food wrap; food, beverage, and industrial process pasteurizers; toilet bowls; recreational water; pools; and spas.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The specific amount of the microbicidal compositions of this invention necessary to inhibit or control the growth of microorganisms in an application will vary. Typically, the amount of the composition of the present invention is sufficient to control the growth of microorganisms if it provides from 1 to 500 ppm (parts per million) active ingredients of the composition. It is preferred that the active ingredients (i.e., nonionic surfactant and DTEA) of the composition be present in the medium to be treated in an amount of at least 3 ppm, preferably at least 5 ppm, preferably at least 10 ppm. It is preferred that the active ingredients of the composition be present in the locus in an amount of no more than 400 ppm, preferably no more than 300 ppm, preferably no more than 200 ppm, preferably no more than 100 ppm, preferably no more than 80 ppm, preferably no more than 70 ppm. In a method of this invention, a composition is treated to inhibit microbial growth by adding, together or separately, the nonionic surfactant and DTEA, in amounts that would produce the concentrations indicated above.

›Examples

Surfactants and biocides were evaluated for synergy by determining the synergy index (S.I.) of the combination. Synergy index was calculated based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of two antimicrobial compounds (A and B) alone and in combinations. The tests organisms were Gram negative bacteria ( Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC #15442), Gram positive bacteria ( Staphylococcus aureus ATCC #6538), yeast ( Candida albicans ATCC#10203) and mold ( Aspergillus niger ATCC#16404). Contact time for the bacteria was 24 and 48 hours, yeast was 48 and 72 hrs, and 3 and 7 days for mold. The test was carried out in 96 well microtiter plates.

R 1 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 5 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 9 H, where R 1 is 2-ethylhexyl  Surf. A

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 5 H  Surf. D

R 2 O(CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O) 3 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 7 H  Surf. E

In Surf. D and Surf. E, R 2 is a mixture of C 8 -C 14 linear alkyl groups (70% C 8 -C 10 linear alkyl and 30% C 12 -C 14 linear alkyl)

Inoculums Used

The pH of the Triptic soy broth was 7.3 and the Potato dextrose broth was 5.1.

The test results for demonstration of synergy of the MIC combinations are shown in the tables below. Each table shows the results for combinations of two components against the microorganisms tested with incubation times; the end-point activity in ppm measured by the MIC for compound A alone (CA), for component B alone (CB), and the mixture (Ca) and (Cb); the calculated SI value; and the range of synergistic ratios for each combination tested. SI is calculated as follows:

Ca/CA+Cb/CB =Synergy Index (“SI”)

Wherein:

CA=concentration of compound A in ppm, acting alone, which produced an end point (MIC of Compound A). Ca=concentration of compound A in ppm, in the mixture, which produced an end point. CB=concentration of compound B in ppm, acting alone, which produced an end point (MIC of Compound B). Cb=concentration of compound B in ppm, in the mixture, which produced an end point.

When the sum of Ca/CA and Cb/CB is greater than one, antagonism is indicated. When the sum is equal to one, additivity is indicated, and when less than one, synergism is demonstrated.

The ratio ranges at which DTEA (in the form of its hydrochloride salt) and the surfactants were tested are as summarized in the following tables:

The following biocides had no synergy against any organism tested when paired with the following surfactants:

Surf. A

Sodium Benzoate, TRIS NITRO

Surf. E

›DMDMH

Surf. D

CS-1246, OPP, DMDMH

In the following combinations, the ratio of surfactant to biocide where synergy was observed were not commercially relevant, i.e., a ratio of 1:0.2 or greater (less biocide relative to surfactant). At these ratios, the biocide levels in a formulated product would be too low to be practical:

Surf. A

›DIDAC, IPBC

Surf. E

›CMIT/MIT, IPBC, OIT, TTPC, WSCP

Surf. D

›CMIT/MIT, OIT, DIDAC

(MBIT, IPBC, WSCP were synergistic only at 1:0.05 or worse except for one data point)

›Tables in the description — 2
Inoculum Size of organisms (CFU/ml) Aspergillus Candida Staphylococcus Pseudomonas niger albicans Surfac- aureus aeruginosa
ATCC#ATCC#
tantsATCC# 6538ATCC # 154421640410203
Surf. A1.156E+068.134E+071.156E+061.156+06
Surf. D1.808E+051.156E+081.156E+065.726E+05
Surf. E1.808E+065.727E+075.726E+051.808E+06
TABLE 4 — Media Used Media Used for testing Staphylococcus Pseudomonas Aspergillus Candida aureus aeruginosa ATCC # niger albicans
ATCC# 653815442ATCC# 16404ATCC#10203
10% Tryptic soy10% Tryptic soyPotato dextrosePotato dextrose
brothbrothbrothbroth
1 of 9 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

5 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N33/08
  • A01N25/30
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07C321/14

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.4 y
1,257 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
after a restriction
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Sarah Pihonak
art unit 1627 · TC 1600
Citations: 14 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1Owner 7
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock