USPatent applicationPatented

Method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in river and lake sediments

Granted 11 Dec 2018 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The present disclosure discloses a method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in sediments of river and lake. The method includes the following steps of: (1) determining concentration levels of heavy metal pollutants at different positions of water body sediments; (2) conducting statistic analysis on distribution characteristics of concentration data of various heavy metal pollutants in the water body sediments; (3) calculating an ecological risk index of a heavy metal pollutant using a formula; (4) calculating a final result of E r i ; (5) drawing a distribution curve of E r i values; (6) calculating a total ecological risk comprehensive index HRI caused by various heavy metal pollutants in the evaluated water body, and drawing a cumulative probability distribution curve of HRI values; and (7) analyzing a probability that the total ecological risk comprehensive index HRI of the water body appears at different risk levels with reference to a risk level classification standard.

Description

7 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a national stage application of International application number PCT/CN 2014/076141, filed Apr. 24, 2012, titled “A METHOD FOR DETERMINING ECOLOGICAL RISKS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN RIVER AND LAKE SEDIMENTS,” which claims the priority benefit of Chinese Patent Application No. 2014101374543, filed on Apr. 4, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the field of method for determining ecological risks, and more particularly, to a method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in particular to sediments of river and/or lake.

›BACKGROUND

With the rapid development of urban and rural construction as well as development and utilization of minerals in China, a number of heavy metal pollutants are discharged to environmental water bodies, such as rivers and lakes, and the like. Heavy metals cannot be decomposed in water, are easily combined with other substances, and deposited into sediments at the bottom of the water body under the absorption effects of suspended matters and overlying sediments. The sediments are important parts of the ecological system in the water body, which not only provide nutrients for the organisms in the water body, but also possibly become an interior source for polluting the water body at the same time. Under certain conditions, the heavy metals enriched in the sediments will enter the water body again to cause secondary pollution, which continuously damages the ecological environment of the water body, and is harmful to the human health through a food chain. Therefore, the sediments become important objects for evaluating the pollution level of the heavy metals in the water body and the health status of the water ecological system.

US Environmental Protection Agency proposed a reference value method for risk evaluation of pollutants in ocean and estuary sediments in 1995, which mainly determines risk evaluation low value ERL (Effects range-low) and risk evaluation median value ERM (Effects range-median) according to the mass data of ocean and estuary sediments in North America; however, this method is not applicable to other regions due to territory differences. While the evaluation method for ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in river and lake sediments most widely applied internationally is a potential ecological risk index method proposed by Hankanson (a Swedish scholar), which not only considers the contents of heavy metals in bottom mud, but also associates the ecological effect and environmental effect of the heave metals with toxicology, and a comparable equivalent attribute index grading method is employed for evaluation. Some researches on the aspect of recognizing the ecological risks of heavy metals in sediments of river and/or lake are also developed in China; however, most of these researches use the potential ecological risk index method of Hankanson. Generally, we start these researches relatively late, which are still at the exploration stage.

The potential ecological risk index method of Hankanson is used as a relatively quick, simple and convenient method for dividing the sediment pollution degrees and potential ecological risks of the water body thereof, which obtains an ecological risk value by means of dividing the average concentration by the background value of the heavy metals in the sediments of the evaluated water body, and then multiplying by a toxicity regulation factor, and is a point estimation method. But actually, the concentrations of the heavy metals in the water body sediments may differ largely in different regions and time periods. The indeterminacy attribute and probability characteristics of the risk problems cannot be reflected by relying on the ecological risk value calculated according to the average concentration and the risk level division thereof. Therefore, it needs to develop a risk analysis method which can reflect the concentration fluctuation characteristics of the heavy metals in the water body sediments and the ecological risk probability attributes, so as to provide more scientific and reliable basis for rationally formulating water ecological environment protection measures.

›SUMMARY

1. Technical Problems to be Solved by the Present Disclosure

With respect to the defects and problems of a conventional identification and method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in sediments on the aspect of processing indeterminacy, the present disclosure establishes a method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in sediments of river and/or lake, which conducts sampling calculation based on Monte Carlo sampling, is suitable for judging the pollution level of heavy metals in the sediments of river and/or lake and identifying the potential ecological risks, and can serve water body pollution control and water ecological management.

2. Technical Solution

The disclosure employs the following technical solution:

a method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in river and lake deposits, including the following steps of:

(1) collecting water body sediment samples for detection and analysis, and determining concentration levels of heavy metal pollutants at different positions of the water body sediments;

(2) conducting statistic analysis on distribution characteristics of concentration data of various heavy metal pollutants in the water body sediments;

(3) calculating an ecological risk index of a heavy metal pollutant using a formula E r i =T r i ×C 0 i /C r i , wherein E r i represents the ecological risk index of an i th heavy metal pollutant; C 0 i represents the measured concentration value (mg/kg) of the i th heavy metal pollutant in the water body sediments; C r i represents the background value (mg/kg) of the heavy metal pollutant before industrialization; T r i represents the ecological toxicity coefficient of the i th heavy metal pollutant; and C r i and T r i are acquired from published literature;

(4) conducting sampling calculation using a Monte Carlo method according to the value distribution characteristics of C 0 i , wherein the sampling times is served as the final sampling times when the average value of E r i _is stable, i.e., the difference of the average values of the twice operations is less than 5%, and the corresponding operation result is the final result of E r i ;

(5) drawing a distribution curve of E r i values, and determining the distribution characteristics of the ecological risks of the i th heavy metal pollutant: analyzing a probability that the ecological risks appear at different risk levels with reference to a risk level classification standard, wherein a higher probability of the E r i value appearing at a high risk level indicates a higher level of potential hazards caused by the heavy metal pollutant to an ecological system, and the heavy metal pollutants are more needed to be preferentially controlled;

(6) calculating a total ecological risk comprehensive index HRI caused by various heavy metal pollutants in the evaluated water body using a formula HRI=ΣE r i , conducting sampling calculation using a Monte Carlo sampling method, and drawing a cumulative probability distribution curve of the HRI values according to the sampling result; and

(7) analyzing a probability that the total ecological risk comprehensive index HRI of the water body appears at different risk levels with reference to the risk level classification standard, wherein a higher probability that the HRI value appears at a high risk level indicates a higher level of potential hazards caused by the heavy metal pollutants in the water body to the ecological system, and heavy metal pollution abatement and water ecology supervision measures are more needed to be taken.

3. Advantageous Effects

The present disclosure provides a method for determining ecological risks of heavy metal pollution in sediments of river and/or lake, which uses a Monte Carlo sampling method to process the defects of the conventional point estimation method for processing the indeterminacy problem based on a Monte Carlo sampling theory so as to reflect the concentration fluctuation characteristics of the heavy metals in the water body sediments and the risk probability attributes, is suitable for judging the pollution level of heavy metals in the sediments of river and/or lake and identifying the potential ecological risks, and provides scientific and reliable basis for water body pollution control and water ecological management. The method can be widely applied to analysis of the ecological risks caused by the heavy metal pollutants in the water body sediments of rivers and lakes, as well as formulation of corresponding ecological environment protection measures.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a total ecological risk cumulative probability distribution diagram of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of a lake.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure will be further described in details hereinafter with reference to the drawings and embodiments.

›Embodiment 1

Ecological risk analysis of heavy metal pollutants in sediments of a lake:

(1) The concentration data of seven heavy metal pollutants including cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, hydrargyrum and arsonium in the sediments of a lake are collected, wherein the concentration data of at least three positions is collected for each heavy metal pollutant, and a same detection and analysis method is used for the same pollutant in different positions.

(2) Statistical analysis indicates that the concentration data of various heavy metal pollutants in the water body sediments of the lake are in normal distribution, and the corresponding statistics values such as minimum, maximum, average value and standard deviation are as shown in Table 1.

(3) The ecological risk indexes of each heavy metal pollutant are calculated using a formula E r i =T r i ×C 0 i /C r i , wherein E r i represents the ecological risk index of an i th heavy metal pollutant; C 0 i _represents the concentration (mg/kg) of the i th heavy metal pollutant in the water body sediments; C r i represents the background value (mg/kg) of the heavy metal pollutant before industrialization; T r i represents the ecological toxicity coefficient of the i heavy metal pollutant. C r i and T r i are from published literature (Lars Hakanson, An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control-A sedimentological approach, 1980), as shown in Table 2.

(4) Sampling calculation is conducted using a Monte Carlo method according to the normal distribution characteristics of the value of C 0 i , wherein the sampling times (5000 times) is served as the final sampling times when the average value of E r i is stable, i.e., when the difference of the average values of the twice operations is less than 5%, and the corresponding operation result is the final result of E r i .

(5) A distribution curve of E r i values is drawn, and the distribution characteristics of the ecological risks of the i th heavy metal pollutant are determined: a probability that the ecological risks appear at different risk levels with reference to a risk level classification standard is analyzed, as shown in Table 3. In each pollutant, the risks of chromium, copper, lead and zinc are all low; the risks of hydrargyrum and arsonium are generally in a low-median level; and the risk of cadmium in the sediments of the lake is generally in a median-high level, and the probability of reaching the extremely high risk level is 18.1%, which indicates that the level of potential hazards caused by the cadmium in the sediments to the ecological system is higher, and the cadmium needs to be preferentially controlled.

(6). A total ecological risk comprehensive index caused by various heavy metal pollutants in the evaluated water body is calculated using a formula HRI=ΣE r i . Sampling conduction is conducted for 5000 times using a Monte Carlo sampling method, and a cumulative probability distribution curve of the HRI values is drawn according to the sampling result, as shown in FIG. 1 .

(7) A probability that the total ecological risk comprehensive index HRI of the water body appears at different risk levels is analyzed with reference to the risk level classification standard, as shown in Table 4. The results indicate that the average HRI value is 347. If only judging according to conventional point estimation, the lake is in a median risk level. However, it can be known from the cumulative probability distribution curve of the HRI values of FIG. 1 that the probability of the HRI values in a low risk level is 5.8%, the probability of the HRI values in a lower risk level is 36.5%, the probability of the HRI values in a median risk level is 51.6%, and the probability of the HRI values in a high risk level is 6.1%. That is, the total ecological risk level of the heavy metal pollutants in the sediments of the lake is a lower-median level, which needs to be concerned to prevent the pollution from deterioration. It is apparent that the total ecological risk level of the lake is overvalued using the average value point estimation analytical method, while the method of the present disclosure determines the ecological risks caused by the heavy metal pollutants in the water body sediments of the lake more objectively and exactly.

›Tables in the description — 4
TABLE 1 — Concentration Data (mg/kg) of Heavy Metals in Sediments of a Lake
CadmiumChromiumCopperLeadZincHydrargyrumArsonium
Minimum018.010.5030.00.020
Maximum23.3329.090.6205.98850.01.36291.8
Average value3.493.950.371.51291.10.2749.7
Standard deviation6.459.226.267.62537.20.3775.1
TABLE 2 — Background Value of Heavy Metal Pollutants before Industrialization and Ecological Toxicity Coefficient
CadmiumChromiumCopperLeadZincHydrargyrumArsonium
T r t3025514010
C r t (mg/kg)19050701750.2515
TABLE 3 — Ecological Risk Analysis Results of Each Heavy Metal Pollutant Risk level
Value ofclassificationProbability
E r tof E r tCadmiumChromiumCopperLeadZincHydrargyrumArsonium
E r t < 40Low10.8%100%100%100%98.4%30.1%40.2%
40 ≤ E r t < 80Lower11.5%0001.6%33.5%36.4%
80 ≤ E r t < 160Median23.5%000033%22.7%
160 ≤ E r t < 320High36.1%00003.4%0.7%
E r t ≥ 320Extremely high18.1%000000
TABLE 4 — Total Ecological Risk Analysis Result of the Lake
HRI valueRisk level classification of HRIProbability
HRI<150Low5.8%
150 ≤ HRI < 300Lower36.5%
300 ≤ HRI < 600Median51.6%
HRI≥600High6.1%

Claims as granted

3 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G16H50/30
  • G06F17/18
  • G01N33/24
  • G06Q50/26

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.6 y
1,692 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Jonathan Han
art unit 2818 · TC 2800
Citations: 6 back · 14 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock