Compositions and applications of three component benzo[1,2-B:4,5-B] dithiophene-thienothiophene randomly substituted polymers for organic solar cells

P(BDT-FTT(P)), (100% FTT(P)): Monomers BDT (0.228 g, 0.252 mmol) and FTT(P) (0.101 g, 0.251 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (14 mg), toluene (10 mL) and dimethylformamide (4 mL). The solution was heated to 130° C. and stirred for 36 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =40 kDa and PDI=2.08).

P((BDT-FTT(P)) 0.7 -(BDT-FTT(E)) 0.3 ), (70% FTT(P), 30% FTT(E)): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.142 g, 0.157 mmol), dibromo-FTT(E) (0.022 g, 0.047 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(P) (0.044 g, 0.109 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (12 mg), toluene (7 mL) and DMF (2.5 mL). The solution was heated to 130° C. and stirred for 24 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =17 kDa and PDI=3.70).

P((BDT-FTT(P)) 0.5 -(BDT-FTT(E)) 0.5 ), (50% FTT(P), 50% FTT(E)): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.108 g, 0.119 mmol), dibromo-FTT(E) (0.028 g, 0.059 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(P) (0.024 g, 0.059 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (7 mg), toluene (6 mL) and DMF (2 mL). The solution was heated to 130° C. and stirred for 24 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =34 kDa and PDI=3.17).

P((BDT-FTT(P)) 0.3 -(BDT-FTT(E)) 0.7 ), (30% FTT(P), 70% FTT(E)): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.080 g, 0.088 mmol), dibromo-FTT(E) (0.029 g, 0.061 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(P) (0.011 g, 0.027 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (5 mg), toluene (6 mL) and DMF (3 mL). The solution was heated to 130° C. and stirred for 36 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =63 kDa and PDI=2.96).

P((BDT-FTT(P)) 0.1 -(BDT-FTT(E)) 0.9 ) (10% FTT(P), 90% FTT(E)): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.093 g, 0.103 mmol), dibromo-FTT(E) (0.044 g, 0.093 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(P) (0.004 g, 0.010 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (6 mg), toluene (6 mL) and DMF (2 mL). The solution was heated to 130° C. and stirred for 24 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =24 kDa and PDI=2.08).

P(BDT-FTT(E)), (100% FTT(E)): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.115 g, 0.127 mmol)) and dibromo-FTT(E) (0.060 g, 0.127 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (7 mg) in toluene (4 mL) and DMF (1 mL). The solution was heated to 115° C. and stirred for 96 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =24 kDa and PDI=2.1).

P((BDT-FTT(E)) 0.25 -(BDT-FTT(K1)) 0.75 ): Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.10 g, 0.11 mmol)), dibromo-FTT(E) (13 mg, 0.0275 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(K1) (36.5 mg, 0.0825 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (12.8 mg) in toluene (4.4 mL) and DMF (1.1 mL). The solution was heated to 120° C. and stirred for 48 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =41 kDa and PDI=2.9).

P((BDT-FTT(E)) 0.5 -(BDT-FTT(K1)) 0.5 ) Monomers distannyl-BDT (100 mg, 0.11 mmol)), dibromo-FTT(E) (26 mg, 0.055 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(K1) (24 mg, 0.055 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (13 mg) in toluene (4.4 mL) and DMF (1.1 mL). The solution was heated to 120° C. and stirred for 48 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =29.6 kDa and PDI=2.9).

P((BDT-FTT(E)) 0.75 -(BDT-FTT(K1)) 0.25 ) Monomers distannyl-BDT (100 mg, 0.11 mmol)), dibromo-FTT(E) (39 mg, 0.0825 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(K1) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (13 mg) in toluene (4.4 mL) and DMF (1.1 mL). The solution was heated to 120° C. and stirred for 48 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =20 kDa and PDI=2.43).

P((BDT-FTT(E)) 0.5 -(BDT-FTT(K2)) 0.5 ) Monomers distannyl-BDT (100 mg, 0.11 mmol)), dibromo-FTT(E) (26 mg, 0.055 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(K2) (21 mg, 0.055 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (7 mg) in toluene (4.4 mL) and DMF (1.1 mL). The solution was heated to 120° C. and stirred for 48 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =23 kDa and PDI=1.4).

P((BDT-FTT(P)) 0.5 -(BDT-FTT(K1)) 0.5 ) Monomers distannyl-BDT (0.185 g, 0.21 mmol)), dibromo-FTT(P) (42 mg, 0.10 mmol) and dibromo-FTT(K1) (44 mg, 0.10 mmol) were combined in a Schlenk flask with Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (32 mg) in toluene (9 mL) and DMF (3 mL). The solution was heated to 120° C. and stirred for 48 h. The solution was poured into 100 mL methanol and the polymer was collected by filtration. The polymer was purified by Soxhlet extraction by washing subsequently with acetone, hexanes and chloroform. The polymer was recovered in the chloroform fraction (M n =16 kDa and PDI=1.9).

Synthesis of P((BDT-FTTM) 0.25 -(BDT-FTTE) 0.75 ): In a 50 mL Schlenk flask, BDTE (150.0 mg, 0.166 mmol) and FTTE (55.93 mg, 0.118 mmol) and FTTM (14.77 mg, 0.039 mmol) and Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (18.3 mg, 0.016 mmol) were added. The mixture was vacuumed and backfilled with argon twice before 7.5 mL of anhydrous toluene and 1.5 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide were added. The solution was frozen by liquid nitrogen and then vacuumed, backfilled with argon and thawed twice before heated to 120° C. for 20 hours. The product was precipitated out in 40 mL methanol and purified by Soxhlet extraction, methanol (16 hour), acetone (8 hour), hexane (16 hour) and dichloromethane (4 hour) and then chloroform 2 hour. The portion from dichloromethane was the main product (62 mg, yield 43.1%) after precipitated from methanol and then dried overnight.

Synthesis of P((BDT-FTTM) 0.5 -(BDT-FTTE) 0.5 ): In a 50 mL Schlenk flask, BDTE (100.0 mg, 0.106 mmol) and FTTE (24.86 mg, 0.053 mmol) and FTTM (19.69 mg, 0.053 mmol) and Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (12.2 mg, 0.011 mmol) were added. The mixture was vacuumed and backfilled with Argon twice before 7.5 mL of anhydrous toluene and 1.5 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide were added. The solution was frozen by liquid nitrogen and then vacuumed, backfilled with Argon and thawed twice before heated to 120° C. for 20 hours. The product was precipitated out in 40 mL methanol and purified by Soxhlet extraction, methanol (16 hour), acetone (8 hour), hexane (16 hour) and dichloromethane (4 hour) and then chloroform 2 hour. The portion from dichloromethane was the main product (60 and 24 mg respectively, yield 60.0%) after precipitated from methanol and then dried overnight.

Synthesis of P((BDT-FTTM) 0.75 -(BDT-FTTE) 0.25 ): In a 50 mL Schlenk flask, BDTE (150.0 mg, 0.166 mmol) and FTTE (18.65 mg, 0.039 mmol) and FTTM (44.3, 0.118 mmol) and Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 (18.3 mg, 0.016 mmol) were added. The mixture was vacuumed and backfilled with Argon twice before 7.5 mL of anhydrous toluene and 1.5 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide were added. The solution was frozen by liquid nitrogen and then vacuumed, backfilled with Argon and thawed twice before heated to 120° C. for 20 hours. The product was precipitated out in 40 mL methanol and purified by Soxhlet extraction, methanol (16 hour), acetone (8 hour), hexane (16 hour) and dichloromethane (4 hour) and then chloroform 2 hour. The portion from chloroform was the main product (116 mg, yield 85.5%) after precipitated from methanol and then dried overnight.

In closing, it should be noted that the discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application. At the same time, each and every claim below is hereby incorporated into this detailed description or specification as an additional embodiment of the present invention.

Device Fabrication and Measurement

ZnO sol-gel was prepared by dissolving zinc acetate dihydrate (220 mg, 1 mmol) and ethanolamine (62 mg, 1 mmol) into 2-methoxyethanol (2 mL) and stirred for 1 h in air. ITO-coated glass substrates were washed with detergent (15 min), DI water (2×15 min), acetone (15 min), and isopropanol (15 min) in an ultrasonication bath. The substrates were placed in a vacuum oven at 80° C. for 2 h and placed in a UV-ozone cleaner for 15 minutes. After filtration with a 0.2 μm PVDF syringe filter, ZnO sol-gel was spin-coated onto the top of the ITO substrate at 5000 rpm for 30 s (acceleration 5000 rpm). The substrate was annealed at 170° C. in air for 15 min and taken into glove box for deposition of the active layer. At the same time, 10 mg of P(BDT-FTT) and 16 mg of PC 70 BM were mixed in ortho-xylene (1 mL) and stirred at 100° C. for 12 h. Diiodooctane (25 μL) was added to the solution and stirred for an additional 1 h, followed by filtration through a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter. Afterwards, the solution was coated on the substrate at 1,800, 2,000, and 2,200 rpm for 20 s. The substrate was solvent annealed inside of glass dishes for 1 h. After solvent annealing, the substrate was scratched at the edge to expose the ITO layer for the metal deposition. The substances were placed in the metal evaporator, and 14 nm of MoO 3 and 100 nm of Ag were deposited. The deposition speed for the MoO 3 was 0.5 Å/s. The deposition speed for Ag started at 0.5 Å/s until 5 nm was deposited. Afterward, the speed increased to 1-1.5 Å/s until 100 nm was deposited. The devices were encapsulated using UV-curable epoxy and a cover glass, and exposed to UV cure for 10 min.

The current density-voltage (J-V) curves were measured using a Keithley 2400 source meter. The photocurrent was measured under AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW/cm 2 under Newport Thermal Oriel 91192 1000 W solar simulator (4″×4″ beam size). The light intensity was calibrated by a mono-silicon detector (with KG-5 visible color filter) calibrated by National Renewable Energy Laboratory to minimize spectral mismatch.

Table 1 depicts the solar cell performance of polymers from Examples 1-6.

Table 2 depicts the solar cell performance of polymers from Examples 7-9.

Table 3 depicts the solar cell performance of polymers from Example 10.

Table 4 depicts the solar cell performance of polymers from Example 11.

The polymer derivative of example 3 was further optimized in devices. A device structure was used which included a [6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid 2-hydroxyethyl ester (PCBE-OH) doped ZnO film as a interfacial layer. The resulting solar cell performance is depicted in FIG. 1 and Table 5 below. The V oc for this device slightly higher compared to the above fabrication method, and the J sc increases to 17.4 mA/cm 2 .

In closing, it should be noted that the discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application. At the same time, each and every claim below is hereby incorporated into this detailed description or specification as an additional embodiment of the present invention.

Although the systems and processes described herein have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims. Those skilled in the art may be able to study the preferred embodiments and identify other ways to practice the invention that are not exactly as described herein. It is the intent of the inventors that variations and equivalents of the invention are within the scope of the claims while the description, abstract and drawings are not to be used to limit the scope of the invention. The invention is specifically intended to be as broad as the claims below and their equivalents.