USPatent applicationPatented

Lactic acid-containing composition for inducing animal ovarian dysfunction

Granted 19 Dec 2017 · 3 office actions

Assignee: NAVIBIOTECH CO. LTD.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Jun Jeong, Jung Moon Ko, Ki Se Lee · Examiner: Dennis Heyer · AU 1628 · TC 1600

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Disclosed is a lactic acid-containing composition for inducing animal ovarian dysfunction, designed to increase meat production by causing ovarian dysfunction within animals. The composition comprises 10 to 90% by weight of lactic acid and 10 to 90% by weight of an adjuvant, having a pH of 1˜5. When locally injected into the ovary, the composition causes the ovarian tissue to lose its function, suppressing the estrus of the animals that thus improve in growth and appetite, with a consequent increase in meat production. Also, because even one injection of the lactic acid-based composition at a small dose can accomplish ovarian dysfunction, no lactic acid is left in the meat as well as the animals. Moreover, the composition, even though administered, does not require a drug-free interval, nor cause an increase in blood lactic acid level, and thus can produce animal products suitable for hormone-free certification.

Description

10 parts
›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a lactic acid-containing composition for inducing animal ovarian dysfunction, designed to increase meat production by causing ovarian dysfunction within animals such as cow or pigs.

›BACKGROUND ART

Forced disruption of the ovarian function of animals such as cows or pigs is known to suppress the estrus cycle of the females, bringing about an improvement in their growth rate and appetite and thus increasing meat production.

For ovarian dysfunction, ovariectomy is conventionally performed on female animals. In this case, the operation scar resulting from an abdominal incision degrades the commercial value and quality of meat of the female animals. Also, ovariectomized animals are difficult to manage in terms of postoperative rehabilitation for the prevention of inflammation of incision sites. Further, an ovariectomy cost, which is generally high, is negatively influential in terms of the economy of meat production.

Alternatively, a progesterone-based agent for inhibiting ovulation and follicular maturation may be fed, together with fodder, to animals to inhibit ovarian function. However, this strategy is imparted with a continuous burden of drug expense, and thus is economically ineffective. Also, the feeding of such hormone inhibitors results in the presence of hormonal ingredients, so that the meat product cannot be given hormone-free certification.

The equipment disclosed in Korean Patent Application Unexamined Publication No. 10-2007-0041658 (entitled “Equipment of myolysis using laser”, hereinafter referred to as “Reference 1”), may be utilized to stop ovarian function, without an abdominal incision. In this regard, the sharp-pointed tip of the equipment may be allowed to penetrate into the functional tissue of the ovary, with the subsequent introduction of a drug, instead of laser, to the ovary. However, this method is cumbersome because it requires an ultrasonic machine and a camera for securing a view for operation, as well as an ingress guiding instrument. Further, the method is burdened with a cost of performing various processes with the instrument, causing an increase in the production cost of meat. Consequently, Reference 1 is difficult to apply in practice.

In order to overcome these disadvantages, the present inventor suggested a device as disclosed in Korean Patent No. 10-1254705 (entitled “Medicine injection device for animal ovary deactivation”, hereinafter referred to as “Reference 2”).

As shown in FIG. 1, the device comprises a catheter to a front portion of which a stopper is fixedly coupled and to a rear portion of which a needle-equipped communication tube is inserted, with a piston placed within the communication tube. The communication tube is also provided with a stopping ring at a rear side thereof, and a stopper is provided at a rear side of the catheter. The piston within the communication tube is connected with a thumb rest through a connection rod.

Having the aforementioned structure, the device of Reference 2 can allow the needle to safely reach a functional ovarian tissue, and thus functions as a device by which a drug for introducing ovarian dysfunction can be conveniently and economically injected. The device of Reference 2 is structured such that the needle is confined within the catheter until the catheter precisely reaches the functional tissue of the ovary. When reaching the functional tissue, the needle is extended from the catheter and penetrates into the functional ovarian tissue by a simple operation. In this position, the drug for introducing ovarian dysfunction is injected by pressing the thumb rest. Subsequently, the needle is retracted and the catheter is entirely withdrawn to finish the operation conveniently and economically.

Thus, Reference 2 can suppress the estrus of female animals, with the consequent advantages of improving growth rate and appetite, increasing meat productivity, avoiding post-operative problems, such as degradation of quality of meat resulting from abdominal incision, a burden of high operative cost and post-operative care, etc., and overcoming the problems encountered with the long-term administration of ovulation and follicular maturation inhibitors in terms of cost and hormone-free certification.

Since not necessitating various instruments including ultrasonic devices, Reference 2 can prevent an increase in the production cost of meat in addition to helping the operation be safe and simple.

Accordingly, a composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction that is applicable to the device of Reference 2 is required. So far, no ovarian dysfunction-inducing compositions that guarantee the safety of meats as foods and which prevent the degradation of quality of meats have been known. There is therefore a need for a composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction that is applicable to the device of Reference 2 and which allows the meat to be produced with high quality and which is safe for ingestion.

›DISCLOSURE

Technical Problem

It is an object of the present invention to provide a lactic acid-based composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction, applicable to the device of Reference 2, which incurs neither inhibitory activity against the growth of animals nor degrades the quality and safety of meats as foods when it is injected into the functional tissue of the ovary.

Technical Solution

In order to accomplish the object, the present invention provides a lactic acid-based composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction, comprising 10 to 90% by weight of lactic acid and 10 to 90% by weight of an adjuvant.

Advantageous Effects

When locally injected into the ovary, as described hitherto, the composition of the present invention causes the ovarian tissue to lose its function, suppressing the estrus of the animals that thus improve in growth and appetite, with a consequent increase in meat production.

In addition, because even one injection of the lactic acid-based composition at a small dose can accomplish ovarian dysfunction, no lactic acid is left in the meat as well as the animals. Moreover, the composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction in accordance with the present invention, even administered, does not require a drug-free interval, nor cause an increase in blood lactic acid level, and thus can produce animal products suitable for hormone-free certification.

›DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a device for injecting a drug for inducing ovarian dysfunction, devised by the present inventor;

FIG. 2 is an image of a cow ovary,

FIG. 3 is an image of a cow ovary into which a needle is penetrated,

FIG. 4 is an image of an ovarian tissue in which an injection solution is dispersed by injection;

FIG. 5 is an image of an ovary from a control not injected with the composition of Example 1;

FIG. 6 is an image of a test group injected with the composition of Example 1;

FIG. 7 is a histological image of an ovary from a normal control (H-E staining);

FIG. 8 is a histological image of ovarian follicles growing in a normal bovine ovarian tissue (H-E staining).

FIG. 9 is an image of an ovarian tissue treated with lactic acid (H-E staining);

FIG. 10 is an image of the ovarian tissue of FIG. 9 , at 1/10 magnification (H-E staining);

FIG. 11 is an image of an ovary from a control that has not been injected with the composition of Example 2; and

FIG. 12 is an image of an ovary from a test group that has been injected with the composition of Example 2.

›BEST MODE

The present invention is concerned with a composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction that comprises 10% to 90% by weight of lactic acid, sodium lactate, or calcium lactate; and 10% to 90% by weight of an adjuvant, wherein the composition is maintained at a pH of 1˜5.

›MODE FOR INVENTION

Reference should now be made to the drawings, in which the same reference numerals are used throughout the different drawings to designate the same or similar components.

The composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction according to the present invention is designed to be introduced to functional ovarian tissue by direct injection. This injection can be conducted with the aid of the device of FIG. 1 . As the thumb rest 402 provided at a rear side of the communication tube 200 is pulled in a rear direction, the communication tube 200 moves toward the rear side of the catheter so that the needle 203 inserted into a front end of the communication tube 200 is confined within the catheter 100 . After separation from the communication tube, the syringe 400 is filled with an injection solution and then engaged at its lower end to the communication tube 200 . In this condition, the thumb rest 402 of the syringe 400 is pushed so that air is excavated from both the communication tube 200 and the needle.

Subsequently, the injection solution in the syringe 400 should be exactly injected into a functional tissue of the ovary 500 . Although the ovary 500 , the vagina, and the uterus are near the rectum 501 , they can be easily discriminated from one another by touch. For example, when the finger is inserted into the rectum 501 of a female animal and the rectum is pressed downward, the ovary 500 can be palpated as being firm to the touch. If he or she grasps and pulls the ovary outwardly with the palm hollowed, a proximal arrangement is formed among the fingers, the rectum wall, the ovary and the vagina wall as shown in FIG. 1 . In this state, when the catheter 100 is inserted into the vagina 202 and the front end of the catheter 100 is lifted upwardly, the operator can detect that that the front end of catheter 100 is positioned immediately beneath the ovary 500 . Under these conditions, the communication tube 200 that protrudes in the rear direction is moved forward by pushing, and the motion is blocked to extend the needle 203 to a proper length as the circumferential part of the needle 203 reaches the stopper 101 . Hence, the needle 203 extends from the front end of the catheter 100 and penetrates through the vaginal wall into the functional tissue of the ovary 500 . At this time, pressing the thumb rest 402 of the syringe 400 allows the injection solution in the syringe 400 to pass through the communication tube 200 and then to be projected from the needle 203 into the functional tissue of the ovary 500 .

After the injection solution loaded to the syringe 400 is injected into the functional tissue of the ovary, the device is extracted from the vagina 500 , with the catheter 100 held by one hand, and then the fingers of the other hand are withdrawn from the rectum 501 .

Once the injection solution is applied to a functional tissue of the ovary, it causes ovarian dysfunction. The injection solution is a composition comprising 10% to 90% by weight of lactic acid and 10% to 90% by weight of an adjuvant, and having a pH of 1˜5.

›Examples3
›Example 1

As an injection solution for inducing ovarian dysfunction, a composition, with a pH of 2, comprising 20% by weight of lactic acid and 80% by weight of the adjuvant phosphate buffered saline was injected at a dose of 5 ml into a functional tissue of the ovary.

A pre-injection ovary is shown in FIG. 2 .

FIG. 3 shows functional ovarian tissue to which a needle has penetrated in the procedure described above, and FIG. 4 shows functional ovarian tissue to which the injection solution has been injected via the needle.

The cow was butchered to excise the ovarian tissue 30 days after the application of the injection solution to the ovarian tissue. The ovarian tissue of the cow was found to undergo a color change from the color hex code #CC3D3D to the color hex code #CCA63D, relative to a control, as compared to FIGS. 5 and 6 .

Color hex code #CC3D3D in control

RGB 2046161

Color hex code #CCA63D

RGB 20416661

In addition, the ovarian tissue injected with the composition measured 21.3 mm in diameter, which was reduced by 18%, compared to that of the control, 26 mm in size.

The composition was examined for ability to induce ovarian dysfunction. In this regard, the composition was injected into 14 test cows. Of them, 13 were anestrous for 3 months, with only one being on heat. The results are summarized in Table 1, below.

Considering the fact that a cow has an estrus cycle of 21 days on average, all the test cows, except one, had been maintained as being completely anestrous for 3 months or longer after the injection (Jul. 30, 2013), with an efficiency of as high as 93%.

Ovarian tissues from the control cows that were not injected with the lactic acid composition were taken as permanent preparations and observed under an optical microscope. As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8 , an ovarian follicle, also called multilaminar primary follicle or preantral follicle, in which liquor folliculi was not sufficiently accumulated, appeared to grow. Also, granulosa cells that proliferated as a result of the mitosis of follicular cells were observed, but with theca interna only.

The bovine ovarian tissues shown in FIGS. 7 and 8 were significantly different in histology from those shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 , which were taken from the test group treated with lactic acid. The most different was that no certain morphologies were found in the cells of the test group (see FIG. 9 ).

For ovarian follicles, no nuclei were found in granulose cells, and membrane borders of cells adjacent to the ovarian follicles were difficult to discriminate. Further, follicular cells that were developed in the ovarian tissues were observed to have no normal morphologies. These observations demonstrated that treatment with lactic acid incurred the necrosis of ovarian cells.

›Example 2

As an injection solution for inducing ovarian dysfunction, a composition, with a pH of 1.4, comprising 40% by weight of lactic acid and 60% by weight of deionized water was injected at a dose of 4 ml into a functional tissue of the ovary.

A color change from color hex code #F15F5F to #F2CB61 was detected in the ovarian tissue of the cow injected with the composition, as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12 .

Pre-injection:#F15F5F

RGB 2419595

Post-injection: #F2CB61

RGB 24220397

In addition, the ovarian tissue injected with the composition measured 17.3 mm in diameter, which was reduced by about 28%, compared to that of the control, 24 mm in size.

The composition was examined for ability to induce ovarian dysfunction. In this regard, the composition was injected into 5 test cows. All of them were anestrous for 3 months. The results are summarized in Table 2, below. Considering the fact that a cow has an estrus cycle of 21 days on average, all the test cows had been maintained as being completely anestrous for 3 months or longer after the injection, with an efficiency of 100%.

›Example 3

As an injection solution for inducing ovarian dysfunction, a composition, with a pH of 2.8, comprising 30% by weight of lactic acid and 30% by weight of the adjuvant protein buffer was injected at a dose of 4 ml into a functional tissue of the ovary. In addition, the ovarian tissue injected with the composition measured 14.3 mm in diameter, which was reduced by about 35%, compared to that of the control, 22 mm in size.

The composition was examined for ability to induce ovarian dysfunction. In this regard, the composition was injected into 4 test cows. All of them were maintained to be anestrous for 9 months until butchery. The results are summarized in Table 3, below. Considering the fact that a cow has an estrus cycle of 21 days on average, all the test cows had been maintained as being completely anestrous for 9 months or longer after the injection, with an efficiency of 100%. Moreover, the test group was measured to gain greater weight than the control.

When injected into a functional tissue of the ovary in this Example, the lactic acid-containing composition for inducing ovarian dysfunction according to the present invention caused tissue necrosis and acidification. The lactic acid injected is decomposed to carbon dioxide and water, which are non-toxic, so that the composition can increase the production of safe meat.

The adjuvants, phosphate buffer, deionized water and protein buffer, used in Examples 1 to 3, were used to stabilize the pH of the composition. Alternatively, other adjuvants may be employed to guarantee the stable performance of the composition of the present invention so long as they are safe.

›INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Although the preferred embodiment(s) of the present invention have (has) been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and substitutions are possible, without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as disclosed in the accompanying claims.

›Tables in the description — 3
TABLE 1 — Wt. on To the test group, an injection solution containing 20% by weight of lactic acid was injected on Jul. 30, 2013.
GroupID. No.Birth DatetestingRemark
Control3007227352012 Sep. 6250With an estrus
cycle of 21
3006995982012 Aug. 23260
3007227432012 Sep. 9233
3000142942012 Jun. 9289
0827840302012 Nov. 30193
0827840482012 Dec. 20165
3007173392012 Nov. 2223
3007173472012 Nov. 7200
3007227942012 Oct. 26203
0753648942012 Mar. 4458
3000140592012 Apr. 14432
0753648862012 Mar. 1417
0753648432012 Feb. 21417
3000139122012 Mar. 25416
0753649922012 Mar. 10410
Test3006995802012 Aug. 17254Anestrous until
November, 2013
3006996022012 Aug. 23279Anestrous until
November, 2013
3006995712012 Aug. 20282Anestrous until
November, 2013
3006995472012 Aug. 16236Anestrous until
November, 2013
3007194242012 Aug. 27273Anestrous until
November, 2013
3006995392012 Aug. 19270Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000142862012 May 29330Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000142192012 Jun. 1312Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000140182012 Apr. 10374Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000142602012 May 16336Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000140422012 Apr. 11370Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000139042012 Mar. 24391Anestrous until
November, 2013
753650082012 Mar. 9388Being in heat on
August 17
3000140752012 Apr. 8396Anestrous until
November, 2013
TABLE 2 — Wt. on To the test group, THE was injected on Jul. 30, 2013.
GroupID. No.Birth DatetestingRemark
Test3000143332012 Aug. 7287Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000144052012 Aug. 11283Anestrous until
November, 2013
3000142942012 Jun. 11282Anestrous until
November, 2013
0707640392012 Feb. 5398Anestrous until
November, 2013
0753648512012 Feb. 21389Anestrous until
November, 2013
TABLE 3 — To the test group, THE was injected on Jul. 5, 2012.
Wt. onWt. on
GroupID No.Birth DatetestingButcheryWt. gainRemark
Control0001501696312000 Feb. 1948956879Regularly estrous
0001952874772006 Aug. 23586634 48″until butchery
0001952865172006 Mar. 10550590 40″on May 5, 2013
Test0001557338612000 Mar. 1396542146Anestrous
0001501635762000 Aug. 15533676143until butchery
0020083588122007 Aug. 19428530102on May 5, 2013
0001501636912000 Aug. 1341651296

Claims as granted

6 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K47/12
  • A61K9/00
  • A61K31/19
  • A61K47/02
  • A61K47/42

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionFinal rejection
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.9 y
1,439 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
after a restriction
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Dennis Heyer
art unit 1628 · TC 1600
Citations: 9 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock