USPatent applicationPatented

Magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method, magnet device, and magnetic resonance imaging apparatus

Granted 12 Jun 2018 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Fujifilm · originally Hitachi, Ltd.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Ryuya Ando · Examiner: Louis Arana · AU 2866 · TC 2800

Life of the application

13 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A computer executes: calculating a first volume distribution (v.d.) of magnetic materials on a shim tray, based on a first magnetic field strength distribution (m.f.s.d.) in a magnetic field space (S 3 ); acquiring a first composite distribution (c.d.) representing a volume by addition of volumes of magnetic materials for each region of the shim tray, and positions of the regions (S 5 ); calculating a virtual m.f.s.d. created by magnetic materials supposed to be arranged as in the first c.d. (S 8 ); calculating a second m.f.s.d. by addition of the first m.f.s.d. and the virtual m.f.s.d. (S 9 ); calculating a second v.d. of magnetic materials on the shim tray, based on the second m.f.s.d. (S 3 ); acquiring a second c.d. representing a volume by addition of volumes of magnetic materials for each region, and positions of the regions (S 5 ); and displaying the positions of regions and the volumes in the first c.d. and second c.d. (S 10 ).

Description

13 parts
›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method, a magnet device, and a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus for adjusting magnetic field homogeneity of a magnetic field generated by a magnetic field generation source.

›BACKGROUND ART

A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparatus can obtain images representing physical and chemical properties of a subject by utilizing a nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon which occurs when the subject (object to be examined) placed in a homogeneous static magnetic field space is irradiated with a radio-frequency pulse, and is used particularly for medical purposes. The magnetic resonance imaging apparatus mainly includes a magnet device for generating a homogeneous static magnetic field in an imaging region (a magnetic field space) in which a subject is carried, a radio frequency (RF) coil which irradiates the imaging region with a radio-frequency pulse, a receiving coil which receives a response from the imaging region, and a gradient magnetic field coil which generates a gradient magnetic field for providing position information on a resonance phenomenon into the imaging region.

In the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus, one of requirements for improving the image quality is to improve static magnetic field homogeneity in the imaging region. Therefore, the magnet device for generating a static magnetic field is subjected to magnetic field homogeneity adjustments in steps of design, fabrication (assembly) and installation. Among these adjustments, the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment in the installation step is performed for example by adjusting a magnetic field inhomogeneity component caused by a fabrication error, ambient environment or the like by adding or removing a magnetic material (magnetic material shim) to or from the magnet device. Matters as to at which position and what amount of the magnetic material shims are arranged can be generalized as optimization matters having magnetic field homogeneity in the imaging space as an objective function. In other words, the arrangement of magnetic material shims can be determined by a linear optimization method or its improved approach or the like by using a given magnetic field distribution in the imaging space.

Patent Literature 1 discloses a method in which, in order to improve work efficiency for the arrangement of magnetic material shims determined by these methods, for each position at which a volume distribution of magnetic material shims to be arranged has a local maximum value or local minimum value, magnetic material shims having volumes obtained by multiplying volume distributions in a region around the position are arranged, and thereby, the number of magnetic material shims to be arranged is significantly reduced.

›CITATION LIST

Patent Literature

Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2009-268791

›SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Technical Problem

As described in Patent Literature 1, for each position at which a volume distribution of magnetic material shims has a local maximum value or local minimum value, magnetic material shims having volumes obtained by multiplying volume distributions in a region around the position are arranged, and thereby, it is not necessary to arrange the magnetic material shims in order to strictly implement the determined volume distribution of the magnetic material shims on a shim tray, and the number of magnetic material shims to be arranged can be significantly reduced, and thus, the time required for magnetic field homogeneity adjustment of adding or removing the magnetic material shims on the shim tray can be reduced.

However, magnetic material shims corresponding to a volume distribution of magnetic material shims which does not belong to the region around the position at which the volume distribution of magnetic material shims has the local maximum value or local minimum value are not arranged, and thus, the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment of adding or removing the magnetic material shims on the shim tray may not be finished with a single operation. Therefore, it is useful if the number of magnetic material shims to be added or removed on the shim tray in the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment can be reduced and the number of magnetic field homogeneity adjustments can also be reduced.

In other words, an object of the present invention is to provide a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method, a magnet device and a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus capable of reducing the number of magnetic material shims to be added or removed in magnetic field homogeneity adjustment and also reducing the number of magnetic field homogeneity adjustments.

Solution to Problem

To solve the above problems, the present invention includes calculating a first volume distribution of magnetic materials on a shim tray, based on a first magnetic field strength distribution in a magnetic field space; acquiring a first composite distribution representing a volume obtained by adding together the volumes of the magnetic materials in each of regions of the shim tray in the first volume distribution, and the positions of the regions; calculating a virtual magnetic field strength distribution created in the magnetic field space by the magnetic materials supposed to be arranged as in the first composite distribution; calculating a second magnetic field strength distribution obtained by adding together the first magnetic field strength distribution and the virtual magnetic field strength distribution; calculating a second volume distribution of the magnetic materials on the shim tray, based on the second magnetic field strength distribution; acquiring a second composite distribution representing a volume obtained by adding together the volumes of the magnetic materials in each of the regions in the second volume distribution, and the positions of the regions; and displaying the positions of the regions and the volumes of the magnetic materials in the first composite distribution and the second composite distribution, respectively.

Advantageous Effects of Invention

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method, a magnet device and a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus capable of reducing the number of magnetic material shims to be added or removed in magnetic field homogeneity adjustment and also reducing the number of magnetic field homogeneity adjustments.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a longitudinal sectional view of the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3A is a perspective view of a shim tray (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means).

FIG. 3B is a portion of a longitudinal sectional view of the shim tray (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means).

FIG. 4 is a connection diagram of a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device which implements a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to the first embodiment of the present invention, and its peripheral devices.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an example of computational grids for calculating a first volume distribution of shim bolts (magnetic materials), corresponding to a magnet device according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7A illustrates a window which displays the first (nth) volume distribution.

FIG. 7B illustrates the first (nth) volume distribution on a radius of the shim tray.

FIG. 8A illustrates a window which displays the first (nth) composite distribution.

FIG. 8B illustrates a window which superimposes and displays the first (nth) volume distribution and the first (nth) composite distribution.

FIG. 9A illustrates the first (nth) volume distribution on the radius of the shim tray, and is a schematic illustration for understanding a concept of a region in which a peak position and a volume are multiplied.

FIG. 9B illustrates the first (nth) volume distribution in a portion of the radius of the shim tray, and is a schematic illustration for understanding an algorithm for determining a region where volumes are multiplied starting at the peak position.

FIG. 10A illustrates a window which displays the first (nth) composite distribution.

FIG. 10B illustrates a window which superimposes and displays the first (nth) volume distribution and a second ((n+1)th) composite distribution.

FIG. 11 illustrates a screen of a display device which displays together plural windows which display plural first to second ((n+1)th) composite distributions in a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a longitudinal sectional view of a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus according to a third embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of an example of computational grids for calculating a first volume distribution of shim bolts (magnetic materials), corresponding to a magnet device according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 7

Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings as appropriate. Incidentally, in the drawings; common portions are indicated by the same reference numerals, and repeated description will be omitted.

(First Embodiment)

FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 according to a first embodiment of the present invention. The magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 includes a magnet device 50 which generates a magnetic field space 3 . The magnet device 50 includes a pair of upper and lower coil containers 1 , 2 , and connecting columns 4 , 5 supporting the pair of upper and lower coil containers 1 , 2 facing each other. The magnetic field space 3 in which a static magnetic field having a vertical direction and homogeneous strength is generated is formed between the pair of upper and lower coil containers 1 , 2 . In the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 , a subject (an object to be examined) is placed in the magnetic field space 3 . The magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 includes an RF transmitting and receiving coil 22 which irradiates the magnetic field space 3 (the subject) with a radio-frequency pulse. The RF transmitting and receiving coil 22 receives a signal caused by a nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon which occurs when the subject (the object to be examined) is irradiated with the radio-frequency pulse. The magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 can obtain images representing physical and chemical properties of the subject, based on the signal.

FIG. 2 illustrates a longitudinal sectional view of the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 according to the first embodiment of the present invention. The magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 includes the magnet device 50 and the RF transmitting and receiving coils 21 , 22 , and, in addition, gradient magnetic field coils 19 , 20 which generate a gradient magnetic field in order to provide position information on the nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon occurring in the magnetic field space 3 , and shim trays 17 , 18 which are used as magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means to improve magnetic field homogeneity in the magnetic field space 3 .

The upper coil container 1 of the magnet device 50 houses a main coil 8 which is formed in a circular ring shape and is a superconducting coil, and a shielding coil 11 . The lower coil container 2 of the magnet device 50 houses a main coil 9 formed in a circular ring shape and being a superconducting coil, and a shielding coil 10 . The main coils 8 , 9 and the shielding coils 10 , 11 act as a magnetic field generation source which generates the magnetic field space 3 . The strength of a magnetic field generated in the magnetic field space 3 by the main coils 8 , 9 and the shielding coils 10 , 11 is substantially homogeneous, and the magnetic field space 3 acts as an imaging space of the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 . The main coils 8 , 9 form mainly a static magnetic field having homogeneous strength and a vertical direction in the magnetic field space 3 . This may be due to the fact that magnetic poles (magnetic pole faces) S are formed in the insides of the main coils 8 , 9 . The shielding coils 10 , 11 suppress the leakage of the magnetic field formed by the main coils 8 , 9 to the outside.

The upper coil container 1 includes a vacuum container 12 formed in a substantially cylindrical shape, a radiation shield 13 housed in the vacuum container 12 , and a helium container 14 housed in the radiation shield 13 . The helium container 14 thus insulated from heat houses the main coil 8 and the shielding coil 11 together with liquid helium as a coolant for the superconducting coil, and is cooled. A configuration of the lower coil container 2 is the same as that of the upper coil container 1 .

As described above, the main coils 8 , 9 and the shielding coils 10 , 11 are configured to homogenize the magnetic field in the magnetic field space 3 ; to improve the homogeneity, a ferromagnetic material (not illustrated) such as iron or a permanent magnet may be arranged inside or outside the vacuum container 12 , inside the radiation shield 13 , or inside the helium container 14 . Moreover, in an example of FIG. 2 , the main coils 8 , 9 and the shielding coils 10 , 11 are illustrated as being provided two each; however, the numbers of main coils and shielding coils are not so limited, and it is obvious that any number of main coils and shielding coils may be provided. Thus, the magnet device 50 is designed and manufactured to homogenize the magnetic field strength in the magnetic field space 3 ; however, actually, an error magnetic field component is produced relative to a homogeneous magnetic field component in the magnetic field space 3 by the influence of a fabrication error or an installation environment. The shim trays 17 , 18 are provided to act as the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means in order to remove the error magnetic field component and improve the magnetic field homogeneity in the magnetic field space 3 .

Recessed portions 15 , 16 are formed in surfaces of the coil containers 1 , 2 facing each other with the magnetic field space 3 in between. The recessed portions 15 , 16 internally house the shim trays 17 , 18 made of a nonmagnetic material, the gradient magnetic field coils 19 , 20 , and the RF transmitting and receiving coils 21 , 22 . The shim trays 17 , 18 are arranged in the rearmost parts of the recessed portions 15 , 16 , the gradient magnetic field coils 19 , 20 are arranged in the shim trays 17 , 18 on the sides thereof close to the magnetic field space 3 , and the RF transmitting and receiving coils 21 , 22 are arranged in the gradient magnetic field coils 19 , 20 on the sides thereof close to the magnetic field space 3 . The gradient magnetic field coils 19 , 20 and the RF transmitting and receiving coils 21 , 22 are installed attachably and detachably and can expose the shim trays 17 , 18 and can perform magnetic field homogeneity adjustment involving addition or removal of magnetic material shims to or from the shim trays 17 , 18 . Incidentally, the shim trays 17 , 18 may be attachable and detachable or may be unattachable and undetachable.

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 7

FIG. 3A illustrates a perspective view of the shim tray (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means) 17 ( 18 ), and FIG. 3B illustrates a portion of a longitudinal sectional view of the shim tray 17 ( 18 ). As illustrated in FIG. 3A , the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) has a disc shape, and FIG. 3B illustrates a cross section containing a central axis z of the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) on one side of the central axis z. As illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B , the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) has many screw holes 26 formed therein. At the time of magnetic field homogeneity adjustment, shim bolts 27 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means) as screw-shaped magnetic material shims are screwed and fixed into the screw holes 26 . The shim bolts 27 are prepared by varying net volumes of magnetic materials according to their lengths or processing method, and an operator of the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment selects the shim bolt 27 having a necessary volume as appropriate for each of the screw holes 26 to screw the shim bolt 27 into each of the screw holes 26 . Incidentally, as illustrated in FIG. 3A , (orthogonal) grids 28 are formed on surfaces of the shim trays 17 , 18 . The grids 28 divide the surfaces of the shim trays 17 , 18 into plural regions. The plural screw holes 26 are contained in each of the regions. Incidentally, in an example of FIG. 3B , the screw-shaped shim bolts 27 are used as the magnetic materials (shims); however, the magnetic materials are not so limited, anything may be used, provided that the magnetic materials can be added and fixed to the shim trays 17 , 18 , or the magnetic materials can be fixed and a certain magnetic material can be removed, and the advantageous effects of the present invention are not lost even if the magnetic materials have any shape such as a columnar shape, a conical shape, a plate shape or a rivet shape.

The magnetic field homogeneity adjustment is an operation for arranging the shim bolts 27 having the volumes required to obtain a homogeneous magnetic field in the screw holes 26 provided at positions required to obtain the homogeneous magnetic field. At which positions the shim bolts 27 are to be arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 and what volumes of the shim bolts 27 are to be arranged in order to obtain the homogeneous magnetic field can be calculated by a computer 62 (see FIG. 4 ) having magnetic field homogeneity adjustment software installed therein, based on a measured value of a magnetic field strength distribution in the magnetic field space 3 . Incidentally, the volumes of the shim bolts 27 may be read as weights (masses) thereof. Moreover, the volumes of the shim bolts 27 may be read as the volumes of the magnetic materials or the weights of the magnetic materials. In other words, a volume distribution or the like to be described later may be read as a weight distribution or the like.

FIG. 4 illustrates a connection diagram of the computer (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) which implements a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to the first embodiment of the present invention, and its peripheral devices (such as an output device 64 ). A magnetic probe 63 is arranged in the magnetic field space (imaging space) 3 of the magnet device 50 (magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 ) and detects a first magnetic field strength distribution in the magnetic field space 3 . The magnetic probe 63 is connected to a data acquisition calculator 61 , and the data acquisition calculator 61 acquires the detected first magnetic field strength distribution. The data acquisition calculator 61 is a computer having a data acquisition program installed therein and can receive and store input of the first magnetic field strength distribution in a predetermined form. Moreover, the data acquisition calculator 61 can display the first magnetic field strength distribution in a predetermined form on a display device 66 . The data acquisition calculator 61 transmits the first magnetic field strength distribution (magnetic field analysis data) to the computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) or does the like to cause the computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) to store the first magnetic field strength distribution. The computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) has the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment software installed therein. The computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) can calculate at which positions the shim bolts 27 are to be arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 and what volumes of the shim bolts 27 are to be arranged, and can display calculated results on a display device 65 or output the calculated results to the output device 64 , by executing algorithms of the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment software. Incidentally, in an example of FIG. 4 , the data acquisition calculator 61 and the computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) are illustrated as being different computers; however, the single computer 62 may also serve as the data acquisition calculator and the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device, since, provided that data acquisition software and the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment software each can operate, this will do.

FIG. 5 illustrates a flowchart of the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

First, at step S 1 , the data acquisition calculator 61 or the operator uses the magnetic probe 63 to measure magnetic field strengths at plural positions in the magnetic field space 3 . In other words, a magnetic field strength distribution (first magnetic field strength distribution) is measured in the magnetic field space 3 . A measured result is inputted to the computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device). The computer 62 (magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device) can acquire the first magnetic field strength distribution and stores the first magnetic field strength distribution.

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 3 of 7

Then, at step S 2 , the computer 62 determines whether or not the first magnetic field strength distribution satisfies a homogeneous magnetic field specification. Specifically, homogeneity in the magnetic field space 3 is calculated from the first magnetic field strength distribution, and a determination is made as to whether or not the homogeneity is more than a predetermined homogeneity (specification). If the first magnetic field strength distribution satisfies the homogeneous magnetic field specification (Yes at step S 2 ), the flowchart is brought to an end. If the first magnetic field strength distribution does not satisfy the homogeneous magnetic field specification (No at step S 2 ), the processing proceeds to step S 3 .

At step S 3 , the computer 62 performs magnetic field adjustment calculation. Specifically, a first (nth) volume distribution indicating the positions and volumes of the shim bolts (magnetic materials) 27 to be arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 is calculated as an output value, based on the first (nth) magnetic field strength distribution as an input value, in order to homogenize the first magnetic field strength distribution.

The magnetic field adjustment calculation is installed as software in the computer 62 . An algorithm of the magnetic field adjustment calculation may be, for example, mathematical programming such as known linear programming or other optimization approaches, or inverse problem solution such as solves an inverse problem, and any approach may be used. In the first embodiment, an algorithm using the reverse programming solution is given as an example.

First, as illustrated in FIG. 6 , the shim trays 17 , 18 and the magnetic field space 3 are represented by computational grids 29 . Nodes 29 a of the computational grids 29 of the shim trays 17 , 18 may coincide with the positions of the screw holes 26 formed in the shim trays 17 , 18 , or are not limited to coinciding therewith. Meanwhile, the nodes 29 a of the computational grids 29 of the magnetic field space 3 are brought into coincidence with the positions (measured positions) in the magnetic field space 3 at which the magnetic field strength is actually measured at step S 1 .

When the shim bolt 27 having a volume V i and magnetization M is arranged at a certain node i ( 29 a , the screw hole 26 ) on the computational grid 29 of each of the shim trays 17 , 18 , magnetic field strength B(i, j) which the shim bolt 27 forms at a certain node j ( 29 a , the measured position) on the computational grid 29 in the magnetic field space 3 is proportional to the volume V i and the magnetization M, as represented by Equation (1), where m i denotes a magnetic dipole moment.

B ( i,j )∝ V i M=m i   (1)

Here, the magnetization M is set constant. Therefore, a distribution (magnetic moment distribution) of the magnetic moments m i of the shim bolts 27 arranged at the nodes 29 a on the computational grids 29 of the shim trays 17 , 18 can be expressed as Equation (2).

Moreover, by using the distribution of the magnetic moments m i , a distribution (magnetic field distribution) of magnetic field strengths B(i, j) formed at the nodes j ( 29 a ) on the computational grid 29 in the magnetic field space 3 can be expressed as Equation (3).

Then, a relationship between the magnetic field distribution (Equation (3)) and the magnetic moment distribution (Equation (2)) can be expressed as Equation (4) with a coefficient matrix replaced with A.

{right arrow over (b)}=A{right arrow over (m)}  (4)

When singular value decomposition is applied to the coefficient matrix A, a pseudo-inverse A′ of the coefficient matrix A can be obtained. Thereby, Equation (4) can be rewritten as Equation (5). Incidentally, the singular value decomposition is described in detail for example in Haruo Yanai et al., “Projection Matrix, Generalized Matrix, Singular Value Decomposition,” UP Applied Mathematics Library 10, 1983.

{right arrow over (m)}=A′{right arrow over (b)}  (5)

Thus, when the target magnetic field distribution (Equation (3)) (to be generated) is determined, a matrix product with the pseudo-inverse A′ is calculated by Equation (5), and thereby, the necessary magnetic moment distribution (Equation (2)) can be calculated. When this is applied to the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment, the magnetic field in the magnetic field space 3 can become homogeneous by adding the target magnetic field distribution (Equation (3)) (to be generated) to the magnetic field distribution (first magnetic field strength distribution) already generated by the main coils 8 , 9 or the like; In other words, when the target homogeneous magnetic field distribution in the magnetic field space 3 is represented as Equation (6) and the measured value (first magnetic field strength distribution) of the magnetic field distribution in the magnetic field space 3 before the adjustment is represented as Equation (7), the target magnetic field distribution (Equation (3)) (to be generated) can be calculated as represented by Equation (8).

{right arrow over (b u )}  (6)

{right arrow over (b m )}  (7)

{right arrow over ( b )}={right arrow over ( b u )}−{right arrow over ( b m )}  (8)

When Equation (8) is substituted into Equation (5) to obtain the magnetic moment distribution (Equation (2)), the volume V i of the shim bolt 27 corresponding to each magnetic moment m i can be calculated by using Equation (9) obtained by transforming Equation (1).

After the above, step S 3 ends to complete calculation of the volumes of the shim bolts (magnetic materials) 27 to be arranged at the positions of the screw holes 26 of the shim trays 17 , 18 . Consequently, the first (nth) volume distribution indicating the positions and volumes of the shim bolts (magnetic materials) 27 is calculated as the output value.

Then, at step S 4 of FIG. 5 , the computer 62 displays the first (nth) volume distribution as illustrated in FIG. 7A on the display device 65 or outputs the first (nth) volume distribution to the output device 64 . When the first (nth) volume distribution is displayed on the display device 65 , a multi-window is provided on a screen of the display device 65 , the first (nth) volume distribution is displayed on one window W 1 of the multi-window. Contour lines are used to display the first (nth) volume distribution. The first (nth) volume distribution is superimposed and displayed on displays of a contour line of the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) and the (orthogonal) grid 28 formed on the surface of the shim tray 17 ( 18 ).

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 4 of 7

FIG. 7B illustrates the first (nth) volume distribution on a radius of the shim tray 17 ( 18 ). The volume (magnetic moment m i ) of the shim bolt (magnetic material) 27 is calculated and displayed for each of the nodes 29 a . Here, the positive value of the volume (magnetic moment m i ) of the shim bolt (magnetic material) 27 along a vertical axis refers to the magnetic moment having the same direction as the direction of the magnetic field of the magnet device 50 , and means that the shim bolt (magnetic material) 27 is added to the shim tray 17 ( 18 ). The negative value thereof refers to the magnetic moment having the opposite direction to the direction of the magnetic field of the magnet device 50 , and means that the shim bolt (magnetic material) 27 is removed from the shim tray 17 ( 18 ).

Then, at step S 5 of FIG. 5 , the computer 62 performs physical quantity (volume) composite calculation. Since arrangement of the shim bolts 27 having corresponding volumes at all of the nodes 29 a , or the screw holes 26 , on the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) requires a large amount of operation, the physical quantity (volume) composite calculation is performed in order to reduce the amount of operation. The physical quantity (volume) composite calculation includes (1) first determining a region as a composite range, and (2) then obtaining an in-region volume by adding together the volumes of the shim bolts 27 corresponding to the nodes 29 a (screw holes 26 ) present in each region. Then, a first (nth) composite distribution indicating the position and the in-region volume for each region is obtained.

Specifically, in (1) determining the region as the composite range, a region A divided by the (orthogonal) grids 28 illustrated in FIG. 7A can be determined as the region as the composite range.

In (2) obtaining the first (nth) composite distribution, an added value m A obtained by adding together the magnetic moments m i is calculated for each region A. The added value m A is represented as Equation (10).

m A =Σ i∈A m i   (10)

For each region A, an in-region volume V A of the shim bolts 27 to be arranged in the region A can be calculated by using Equation (11).

After the above, step S 5 ends to complete calculation of the in-region volume V A of the shim bolts (magnetic materials) 27 to be arranged at the positions in each region A of the shim trays 17 , 18 . Consequently, the first (nth) volume distribution indicating the position and the in-region volume V A for each region A is calculated.

Then, at step S 6 , the computer 62 displays the first (nth) composite distribution as illustrated in FIG. 8A on the display device 65 or outputs the first (nth) composite distribution to the output device 64 . When the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed on the display device 65 , a multi-window is provided on the screen of the display device 65 , the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed on one window W 2 of the multi-window. The first (nth) composite distribution is represented by superimposing and displaying the in-region volume V A of the corresponding region A on display of the region A divided by the (orthogonal) grid 28 . Moreover, the first (nth) composite distribution and the region A divided by the (orthogonal) grid 28 are superimposed and displayed on display of contour lines. Further, as illustrated in FIG. 8B , the first (nth) volume distribution illustrated in FIG. 7A may be superimposed and displayed. Superimposition of the first (nth) composite distribution and the first (nth) volume distribution as illustrated in FIG. 8B is displayed on one window W 3 of the multi-window on the screen of the display device 65 . The windows W 1 to W 3 can be selectively displayed or be displayed side by side.

The unit of numerical values of the in-region volume V A described in the region A of FIG. 8A is a unit representing a volume, such for example as cubic centimeters. The size of the orthogonal grid 28 is appropriately predetermined to have sufficient performance for magnetic field homogeneity adjustment, and the orthogonal grid 28 has a dimension of 50 mm square. In steps S 5 and S 6 , the shim bolts 27 having the in-region volume V A are arranged in all regions A, and thus, the number of regions A is smaller than the number of screw holes 26 , and thus, the amount of operation can be reduced as compared to the arrangement of the shim bolts 27 in all screw holes 26 .

Moreover, the amount of operation can be further reduced by modifying step S 5 in the following manner.

The physical quantity (volume) composite calculation of step S 5 includes (1) first determining a region A as a composite range, and (2) then obtaining an in-region volume V A calculated by adding together the volumes V i of the shim bolts 27 corresponding to the nodes 29 a (screw holes 26 ) present in each region A, and a first (nth) composite distribution indicating the position for each region A. This modification modifies a method for determining the region A as the composite range.

FIG. 9A illustrates the first (nth) volume distribution on the radius of each of the shim trays 17 , 18 in the same manner as FIG. 7B , and FIG. 9B illustrates an enlarged view of a portion of the first (nth) volume distribution. As illustrated in FIG. 9A , the first (nth) volume distribution exhibits peaks (local maximum values or local minimum values) P 1 to P 7 (Pn) at any of the nodes 29 a . Therefore, first, the nodes 29 a indicating the peaks (local maximum values or local minimum values) P 1 to P 7 (Pn) are extracted. Then, as illustrated in FIG. 9B , starting at the node 29 a indicating the peak P 1 (Pn), a range in which a predetermined relationship of the magnetic moment (volume of the magnetic material) is satisfied between the adjacent nodes 29 a (between a 0th (nth) layer and a first ((n+1)th) layer) is determined as a region A 1 (An, A). The adjacent node 29 a which does not satisfy the predetermined relationship is set as a region boundary of the region A 1 (An, A). Thereby, the position of the node 29 a indicating the peak P 1 (Pn) is arranged substantially at a center of the region A 1 (An, A). FIGS. 9A and 9B are one-dimensional schematic representations illustrating in outline the method for determining the region A; when this is expanded to the nodes 29 a of the actual two-dimensional computational grids 29 , the following is obtained.

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 5 of 7

First, all peaks Pn are extracted from the magnetic moment distribution (first (nth) volume distribution). When the magnetic moment at a certain node i is defined as m i and the magnetic moment at all adjacent nodes j corresponding to the node i is defined as m j , if a relationship represented as Equation (12) is established for all the adjacent nodes j, the node i is the peak Pn.

m i >m j >0 or m i <m j <0   (12)

Then, starting at a node corresponding to each peak Pn, the value of the magnetic moment at the adjacent nodes is examined, while the boundary of the region An is determined. The boundary of the region An is determined to satisfy the following predetermined relationship.

(1) The node corresponding to the peak Pn is defined as a 0th layer.

(2) Among all adjacent nodes at a certain node k belonging to an nth layer, a set of the remaining nodes exclusive of nodes already defined as the nth layer or other layers is defined as C.

(3) If the node corresponding to the peak Pn has a positive magnetic moment for all nodes o belonging to the set C of the nodes and has a relationship with the nodes o as represented as Equation (13), the nodes o are defined as an (n+1)th layer. Moreover, if the node corresponding to the peak Pn has a negative magnetic moment for the nodes o and has a relationship with the nodes o as represented as Equation (14), the nodes o are defined as the (n+1)th layer. When the node o which does not satisfy these conditions, even if one, is present, the node k rather than the node o is redefined as the (n + 1)th layer.

0<m k <m o or m o <0   (13)

m o <m k <0 or m o >0   (14)

(4) (2) and (3) are repeated until a condition such that all nodes belonging to the nth layer are redefined as the (n + 1)th layer is obtained.

(5) A node group which finally forms the outermost layer is the boundary of the region An (region boundary). By the above, the region An (A) corresponding to the peak Pn is determined.

The above is (1) the modified method for determining the region An (A) as the composite region by the physical quantity (volume) composite calculation. (2) Obtaining the in-region volume V A calculated by adding together the volumes V i of the shim bolts 27 corresponding to the nodes 29 a (screw holes 26 ) present in each region A (An), and the first (nth) composite distribution indicating the position for each region A (An), following after (1), can use the algorithm as it is. Incidentally, the position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn can be set as the position of the region A (An).

Moreover, in the physical quantity (volume) composite calculation of step S 5 , the method for determining the region An (A) as the composite region, indicated by (1), is modified, and thereby, the first (nth) composite distribution displayed at step S 6 changes as illustrated in FIG. 10A . As illustrated in FIG. 10A , the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed on the display device 65 or is outputted to the output device 64 . When the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed on the display device 65 , a multi-window is provided on the screen of the display device 65 , the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed on one window W 4 of the multi-window. The first (nth) composite distribution is represented by superimposing and displaying display of the region A divided by the region boundary and displays of the position of the corresponding region A (position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn) and the in-region volume V A on displays of contour lines of the (orthogonal) grids 28 and the shim tray 17 ( 18 ). Incidentally, the in-region volume V A or marks ▴ and ▾ are represented at the position of the region A (the position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn). The mark ▴ is represented when the in-region volume V A is positive, and the mark ▾ is represented when the in-region volume V A is negative. The mark represented when the in-region volume V A is positive is different from that represented when the in-region volume V A is negative, and thereby, the addition or removal of the shim bolts 27 can be easily identified. Moreover, preferably, coordinates (A, 0) to (S, 18) capable of identifying the grids are displayed at the (orthogonal) grids 28 . Thereby, the operator can easily determine the position of the region A (position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn). Moreover, the windows W 1 to W 4 can be selectively displayed or be displayed side by side.

Then, at step S 7 of FIG. 5 , the computer 62 determines whether or not a predetermined number of magnetic field adjustment calculations of step S 1 has been performed. Two or more is set as the predetermined number. Description will be given later taking an instance where two is set as the predetermined number. In the above description, the magnetic field adjustment calculation of step S 1 is performed only once, and thus, the predetermined number of magnetic field adjustment calculations, or two magnetic field adjustment calculations, is not performed (No at step S 7 ), and the operation goes to step S 8 .

Then, at step S 8 , the computer 62 calculates a virtual magnetic field strength distribution formed in the magnetic field space 3 by the first (nth) composite distribution. The first (nth) composite distribution is formed of a combination of the coordinate (position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn) and the in-region volume V A of the shim bolt 27 to be arranged at the position, and thus, a magnetic field strength distribution (virtual magnetic field strength distribution) formed in the magnetic field space 3 by the first (nth) composite distribution can be simply calculated.

Then, at step S 9 , the computer 62 calculates a second ((n+1)th) magnetic field strength distribution by adding together the first (nth) magnetic field strength distribution and the virtual magnetic field strength distribution. The virtual magnetic field strength distribution is represented as Equation (15). As represented by Equation (16), when the virtual magnetic field strength distribution is added to the first (nth) magnetic field strength distribution (Equation (7)) to assume that the first (nth) composite distribution is arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 and the magnetic field strength in the magnetic field space 3 is measured, a magnetic field strength distribution (second ((n+1)th) magnetic field strength distribution) which can be measured is determined by calculation.

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 6 of 7

{right arrow over (b c )}  (15)

{right arrow over ( b l )}={right arrow over ( b m )}+{right arrow over ( b c )}  (16)

Then, the operation returns to step S 3 , and the computer 62 performs another magnetic field adjustment calculation. Specifically, the second magnetic field strength distribution calculated at step S 9 is used as the input value for this calculation, although the first magnetic field strength distribution is used as the input value for the previous calculation. Thereby, a new magnetic field distribution to be generated is calculated from a difference from a target homogeneous magnetic field distribution, based on the second magnetic field strength distribution, as represented by Equation (17) in the same manner as Equation (8).

{right arrow over ( b ′)}={right arrow over ( b u )}−{right arrow over ( b l )}  (17)

Equation (5) is used for the new magnetic field distribution to be generated to set the output value, and a second (nth) volume distribution (magnetic moment distribution) indicating the positions and volumes of the shim bolts (magnetic materials) 27 to be arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 is calculated in order to homogenize the second magnetic field strength distribution.

The second (nth) volume distribution calculated at step S 3 is displayed at step S 4 , and the second (nth) composite distribution is obtained at step S 5 and is displayed at step S 6 . In other words, a combination of the position of the region A (position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn) and the in-region volume V A is determined as the second (nth) composite distribution.

Then, at step S 7 , the computer 62 determines whether or not a predetermined number of magnetic field adjustment calculations of step S 1 has been performed. Although description is given taking an instance where the predetermined number is set to two as mentioned previously, the calculation is performed this time and thereby two magnetic field adjustment calculations of step S 1 are performed (Yes at step S 7 ), and thus, the operation goes to step S 10 .

At step S 10 , as illustrated in FIG. 10B , the computer 62 recognizably displays the plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions. The plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are displayed on the display device 65 or are outputted to the output device 64 . When the plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are displayed on the display device 65 , a multi-window is provided on the screen of the display device 65 , the plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are displayed on one window W 5 of the multi-window. The plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are represented by display of the region A divided by the region boundary and displays of the position of the corresponding region A (position of the node 29 a corresponding to the peak Pn; corresponding to the display positions of the marks ▴ and ▾ and the in-region volume V A . The plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are superimposed and displayed on displays of contour lines of the (orthogonal) grids 28 and the shim tray 17 ( 18 ). According to a procedure of calculation, the first (nth) composite distribution is relatively larger in calculated in-region volume V An than the second ((n+1)th) composite distribution and thus has a higher degree of importance for magnetic field homogeneity adjustment operation. Therefore, desirably, the in-region volume V An of the first (nth) composite distribution can be distinguished from the second ((n+1)th) composite distribution by changing a display color or font or by changing the type of line of the region boundary of the region A. Further, the window W 4 on which the first (nth) composite distribution is displayed as illustrated by way of example in FIG. 10A is provided, while a window on which the second ((n+1)th) composite distribution is displayed may be provided. The windows W 4 , W 5 can be selectively displayed or displayed side by side on the display device 65 . Moreover, the windows W 4 , W 5 may be displayed together with the windows W 1 to W 3 .

At step S 11 , the operator arranges the shim bolts 27 on the shim trays 17 , 18 according to the display. Specifically, the shim bolts 27 corresponding to the in-region volumes V An , of the plural first to second ((n + 1)th) composite distributions are arranged at the corresponding positions on the shim trays 17 , 18 , based on the positions of the regions A of the plural first to second ((n+1)th) composite distributions (the positions of the nodes 29 a corresponding to the peaks Pn) and the in-region volume V An . Assuming that the shim bolts 27 are arranged on the shim trays 17 , 18 for the first (nth) composite distribution, the second ((n+1)th) composite distribution corresponds to a calculated result of a composite distribution to be required next, and thus, the operator can simultaneously arrange the first (nth) composite distribution and the second ((n+1)th) composite distribution on the shim trays 17 , 18 , and substantially, two arrangement operations for the shim bolts 27 can be performed by a single operation.

The operator can obtain the effect of substantially two magnetic field homogeneity adjustment operations by arranging the shim bolts 27 at 12 locations for example in an example of FIG. 10B (it is obvious that the number of locations, 12, is given merely by way of example in FIG. 10B and varies according to circumstances in the actual magnetic field homogeneity adjustment operation), and operation efficiency is improved as compared to a case where the shim bolts 27 are arranged based on a single calculated result (first (nth) composite distribution alone). Moreover, a magnet device using such a method and a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus using the magnet device can reduce the time required for installation adjustment, and consequently, an inexpensive device can be provided.

In the above-described example, the approach of determining the first and second composite distributions, or equivalently, repeating substantially two calculations, is given by way of example; however, it is clear that the number of procedures for calculating the composite distribution is not necessarily limited to two, and three or more calculations may be performed (first and second composite distributions may be determined).

›DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 7 of 7

Incidentally, the above-described approach is effective in reducing the number of operations; however, the region An and the region boundary are approximately determined, and thus, plural magnetic field homogeneity adjustment operations are repeatedly performed in order to increase the accuracy of magnetic field homogeneity adjustment. Moreover, in the process of repeating, if switching between the displays of FIGS. 8A and 8B and the displays of FIGS. 10A and 10B can be arbitrarily performed, the operator can proceed the operation while appropriately changing a detailed arrangement of shim bolts as illustrated in FIGS. 8A and 8B and a so-called rough arrangement of shim bolts as illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 10B . Incidentally, the displays of FIGS. 8A and 8B provide the in-region volume V An of the plural first to second ((n+1)th) composite distributions in the region A; however, if the displays are complicated, the in-region volume V An obtained by summing for each region A may be displayed.

Then, the operation returns to step S 1 , and the data acquisition calculator 61 or the operator uses the magnetic probe 63 to measure again a magnetic field strength distribution (first magnetic field strength distribution) in the magnetic field space 3 .

Then, at step S 2 , the computer 62 determines whether or not the first magnetic field strength distribution satisfies the homogeneous magnetic field specification. If the first magnetic field strength distribution satisfies the homogeneous magnetic field specification (Yes at step S 2 ), the flowchart of the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method is brought to an end. If the first magnetic field strength distribution does not satisfy the homogeneous magnetic field specification (No at step S 2 ), the operation goes to step S 3 . For example, if the first magnetic field strength distribution satisfies the homogeneous magnetic field specification by the arrangement of the shim bolts 27 at step S 11 , the magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method is brought to an end.

(Second Embodiment)

FIG. 11 illustrates a screen of the display device 65 which displays together plural windows W 6 to W 8 which display plural first to third composite distributions in a magnetic field homogeneity adjustment method according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that the second embodiment displays the plural first to third composite distributions in a table. The coordinates of the arrangement positions (the regions A) and the volumes (the in-region volumes) V An of the plural first to third composite distributions are displayed in tabular form. Moreover in the second embodiment, it is desirable that to which of the first to third composite distributions the displayed volume corresponds to can be identified. In the second embodiment, the first to third composite distributions are displayed in different tables. Besides the different tables, for example, a method in which colors or fonts which display the coordinates of the arrangement positions (regions A) and the volumes (in-region volumes) V An of the plural first to third composite distributions are different may be used. Thus, if the arrangement positions (coordinates) and the volumes (in-region volumes) V An of the shim bolts 27 are clear even without depending on images, the substance of adding (multiplying) the volume distributions on the shim trays 17 , 18 does not change, and thus, the number of shim bolts 27 to be arranged can be reduced, and the number of arrangements (magnetic field homogeneity adjustments) of the shim bolts 27 can also be reduced, and thus, ease of operation can be greatly enhanced.

(Third Embodiment)

FIG. 12 illustrates a longitudinal sectional view of the magnetic resonance imaging apparatus 100 according to a third embodiment of the present invention. The magnet device 50 (see FIG. 1 ) of the first embodiment generates a vertical magnetic field in the magnetic field space 3 by the magnetic poles vertically arranged facing each other, whereas a magnet device 51 of the third embodiment is different from the magnet device 50 in that the magnet device 51 generates a horizontal magnetic field in the magnetic field space 3 by the double cylindrical vacuum container 12 whose central axis coincides with a z axis, the radiation shield 13 , and a group of the superconducting coils 8 , 11 contained in the helium container 14 . As illustrated in FIG. 12 , the magnet device 51 has a configuration in which the gradient magnetic field coil 19 ( 20 ) is arranged on an inner periphery of the double cylindrical vacuum container 12 , and the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) is contained in the gradient magnetic field coil 19 ( 20 ). The configuration is merely illustrative, and the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) may be arranged on an inner peripheral side of the gradient magnetic field coil 19 ( 20 ) or may be arranged on an outer peripheral side thereof.

FIG. 13 illustrates a perspective view of an example of the computational grid 29 for calculating the first volume distribution of the shim bolts (magnetic materials), corresponding to the magnet device 51 according to the third embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 12 , the computational grid 29 is arranged in such a manner that the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) contained in the gradient magnetic field coil 19 ( 20 ) surrounds the spherical magnetic field space 3 . The computational grid 29 enables performing calculation in the same manner as the first embodiment and also performing magnetic field homogeneity adjustment operation on the magnet device 51 in quite the same manner as the first embodiment, and also enables improving the operation efficiency. Incidentally, FIG. 13 illustrates an instance where the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) has a cylindrical shape; however, the shim tray 17 ( 18 ) is not limited to having a circular shape in cross section but may have a non-circular shape in cross section, such for example as an elliptical shape, depending on the shape of the gradient magnetic field coil 19 ( 20 ).

›REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

1 Upper coil container

2 Lower coil container

3 Magnetic field space (Homogeneous magnetic field space, Imaging space)

4 , 5 Connecting column

8 , 9 Main coils (Magnetic field generation source)

10 , 11 Shielding coils (Magnetic field generation source)

12 Vacuum container

13 Radiation shield

14 Helium container

15 , 16 Recessed portion of vacuum container

17 , 18 Shim tray (Magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means)

19 , 20 Gradient magnetic field coil

21 , 22 RF transmitting and receiving coil

26 Screw hole

27 Magnetic material (Shim bolt, Magnetic material shim, Magnetic field homogeneity adjustment means)

28 Grid (Orthogonal grid)

29 Computational grid

29 a Node of computational grid

50 , 51 Magnet device

62 Magnetic field homogeneity adjustment device (Computer)

100 Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus

A Region

W 0 Multi-window

W 1 Window

S Magnetic pole face

Claims as granted

15 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01R33/3815
  • G01R33/56
  • G01R33/3873
  • G01R33/381
  • G01R33/387
  • G01R33/565
  • G01V3/00
  • G01R33/38

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
5.3 y
1,938 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Louis Arana
art unit 2866 · TC 2800
Citations: 13 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2014201620182020202220242026202820302032Owner 1Owner 2Owner 3Owner 5liens, releases & corrections
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock