USPatent applicationPatented

Transmission voltage loss compensation circuit, compensation method, controlling chip and switching power supply

Granted 9 Aug 2016 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Silergy

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Xiaoru Xu, Yunlong Han · Examiner: Timothy J Dole · AU 2838 · TC 2800

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In one embodiment, a method of compensating for transmission voltage loss from a switching power supply, can include: (i) receiving a sampling signal that represents an output current of the switching power supply; (ii) delaying the sampling signal to generate a delayed sampling signal; (iii) converting the delayed sampling signal to generate a compensation signal; and (iv) regulating an output voltage of the switching power supply based on the compensation signal to compensate for the transmission voltage loss from the output voltage transmission to a load such that a voltage at the load is maintained as substantially consistent with an expected voltage at the load.

Description

8 parts
›RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of Chinese Patent Application No. 201310131758.4, filed on Apr. 15, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of power supplies, and more particularly to a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit, compensation method, controlling chip, and an associated switching power supply.

›BACKGROUND

A switched-mode power supply (SMPS), or a “switching” power supply, can efficiently convert electrical power from a source to a load, or to several different loads, with each corresponding to a different output. The main transistor of a switching-mode supply can switch between on and off states at a given operating frequency, and voltage regulation can be achieved by varying the ratio of the on-to-off time of the main transistor. Switch mode power supplies may have relatively high power conversion efficiency, as compared to other types of power converters. Switch mode power supplies may also be substantially smaller and lighter than a linear supply due to the smaller transformer size and weight.

›SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a method of compensating for transmission voltage loss from a switching power supply, can include: (i) receiving a sampling signal that represents an output current of the switching power supply; (ii) delaying the sampling signal to generate a delayed sampling signal; (iii) converting the delayed sampling signal to generate a compensation signal; and (iv) regulating an output voltage of the switching power supply based on the compensation signal to compensate for the transmission voltage loss from the output voltage transmission to a load such that a voltage at the load is maintained as substantially consistent with an expected voltage at the load.

In one embodiment, a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit configured for a switching power supply, can include: (i) a delay circuit configured to delay a sampling signal that represents an output current of the switching power supply to generate a delayed sampling signal; (ii) a voltage-current conversion circuit configured to convert the delayed sampling signal to a first current signal, where the first current signal is coupled to a feedback terminal to generate a compensation signal; and (iii) a controlling circuit having the feedback terminal and being configured to regulate an output voltage of the switching power supply based on the compensation signal to compensate for transmission voltage loss from the output voltage transmission to a load such that a voltage at the load is maintained as substantially consistent with an expected voltage at the load.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an example flyback power supply.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an example transmission voltage loss compensation circuit for a switching power supply, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of example delay and voltage-current converting circuits of the example of FIG. 2 .

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example method of compensating for voltage transmission loss from a switching power supply, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 3

Reference may now be made in detail to particular embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention may be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it may be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents that may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, processes, components, structures, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.

Along with rapid development in the electronic information industry, switching power supplies are widely used in computers, electrical equipment, instruments and meters, light-emitting diode (LED) lighting, medical equipment, military equipment, and other fields. Switching power supplies are generally employed to convert an external AC source (e.g., 220V, 380V, etc.) to a substantially constant DC source to supply power for loads (e.g., LEDs, other circuitry, etc.).

Referring now to FIG. 1 , shown is a schematic block diagram of an example flyback power supply. This example switching power supply can include controlling circuit 101 , rectifier circuit 102 , and power stage 103 . For example, controlling circuit 101 can control the on and off states of main switch (e.g., transistor) M1 of power stage 103 , in order to maintain substantially constant output voltage V O at a secondary side of transformer T of power stage 103 .

However, due to the transmission wire resistance that comes into play when transferring output voltage V O to loads (e.g., R cable can represent an equivalent resistor of the transmission wire), voltage V O * at the load be V O *=V O −I O ×R cable . Here, I O can represent the output current of the switching power supply. For example, if output current I O varies (e.g., increases), the voltage drop on the transmission wire can also increase, and this can cause a failure to maintain the original or expected constant value of voltage V O * at the load.

In order to overcome such transmission line losses, a compensation apparatus, such as one or more capacitors configured to regulate the output current in order to decrease the voltage drop on the transmission wire, can be employed. However, the reactive power of capacitors is in direct proportion with the square of the supply voltage, or voltage across such capacitors. Thus, if the supply voltage is lower than a rated value of a particular capacitor, the loss of the capacitor can be increased, thus possibly reducing the lifetime of the capacitor. Further, because the capacitance of the capacitor is fixed, there are some limitations to regulation of the output current in this approach. In addition, overall cost and circuit volume can be increased if a capacitor bank is utilized, also resulting in integration difficulties.

In one embodiment, a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit configured for a switching power supply, can include: (i) a delay circuit configured to delay a sampling signal that represents an output current of the switching power supply to generate a delayed sampling signal; (ii) a voltage-current conversion circuit configured to convert the delayed sampling signal to a first current signal, where the first current signal is coupled to a feedback terminal to generate a compensation signal; and (iii) a controlling circuit having the feedback terminal and being configured to regulate an output voltage of the switching power supply based on the compensation signal to compensate for transmission voltage loss from the output voltage transmission to a load such that a voltage at the load is maintained as substantially consistent with an expected voltage at the load.

Referring now to FIG. 2 , shown is a schematic block diagram of an example transmission voltage loss compensation circuit for a switching power supply, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. This example switching power supply can include controlling circuit 201 having a constant current and/or constant voltage controlling mode. Controlling circuit 201 can include a voltage feedback circuit, a current feedback circuit, a controlling subcircuit, and a logic and driving circuit see, e.g. U.S. Publication No. 2013/0223108 for example implementations of such circuitry).

In particular embodiments, a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit can include delay circuit 202 and voltage-current conversion circuit 203 . For example, delay circuit 202 can delay sampling signal V IO that represents an output current of the switching power supply, in order to generate delayed sampling signal V d which can be provided to voltage-current conversion circuit 203 . Also in this example, sampling signal V IO can also be coupled to the current feedback circuit of controlling circuit 201 through sampling resistor Rs in the flyback switching power supply. Sampling signal V IO can be determined as indicated below in formula (1).

Here, I p can represent a peak current of the primary winding of flyback switching power supply, T dis can represent a discharging time of the secondary winding, and T s can represent the switching cycle. The output current can be indicated as below in formula (2), in accordance with operating principles flyback switching power supplies.

If the number of turns of the primary winding of transformer T is N 1 , and the number of turns of secondary winding is N 2 , N can represent a ratio of the number of turns of the primary winding to that of the secondary winding of transformer T. Form formula (1) and (2), it can be deduced that sampling signal V IO can represent the output current of the switching power supply. Also, while the above formulas and examples relative to sampling signal V IO can be applied in a flyback type of switching power supply, any suitable converter topology (e.g., flyback, forward, boost, buck, SEPIC, ZETA, etc.) can be employed in particular embodiments.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 3

In certain embodiments, voltage-current conversion circuit 203 can convert delay signal V d to current signal I CC . In addition, voltage-current conversion circuit 203 can be coupled to a feedback terminal (FB) of the output voltage of the switching power supply (e.g., via auxiliary winding T3) at controlling circuit 201 , to generate a compensation signal (V comp ), which can be a voltage across resistor R 1 that is based on current signal I CC . In particular embodiments, output voltage V O can be regulated by controlling circuit 201 in accordance with compensation signal V comp to compensate for a voltage loss that occurs due to transmission of the output voltage to the load. In this way, output voltage V O * at the load can be maintained as substantially consistent with an expected output voltage.

Referring now to FIG. 3 , shown is a schematic block diagram of example delay and voltage-current converting circuits of the example of FIG. 2 . In this example, delay circuit 202 can include capacitors C 2 and C 3 , and switches M2 and M3. Switches M2 and M3 can connect series between sampling signal V IO and delayed sampling signal V d at voltage-current conversion circuit 203 . Capacitor C 2 can connect to a common node between switches M2 and M3, and ground. Also, capacitor C 3 can connect to a common node between switch M3 and delayed sampling signal V d at voltage-current conversion circuit 203 , and to ground. For example, the on and off states of switch M3 can be controlled by clock signal CLK, and the on/off states of switch M2 can be controlled by an inverted version of clock signal CLK.

In operation, the bandwidth of the compensation loop can be controlled to guarantee stability of the transmission voltage loss compensation circuit. The bandwidth can generally decrease (e.g., the time constant of the compensation circuit can be set as 20 ms) to achieve better stability of the compensation loop, and to avoid interference to the bandwidth of the system. Delay circuit 202 can meet the above requirements, and may also significantly decrease overall cost and circuit volume, as compared to conventional approaches. The equivalent time constant τ eq of delay circuit can be indicated as below in formula (3).

τ eq =C 3 ×R eq   (3)

R eq can represent an equivalent resistance (e.g., of switches M2 and M3) of delay circuit 202 . Formula (4) below can be deduced in accordance with the example circuit configuration.

Here, T CLK can represent the switching cycle of clock signal CLK. Formula (4) can be converted to obtain formula (5), as shown below.

If C 3 is far greater than C 2 , the equivalent resistance R eq can be as shown below in formula (6).

Formula (6) can be substituted into formula (3) to obtain formula (7), as shown below.

For example, when equivalent time constant τ eq is set as 20 ms, T CLK can be 1 ms, C 2 can be 0.5 pF, and C 3 can be 10 pF. Therefore, improved stability of the transmission voltage loss compensation circuit can be achieved, and cost and circuit volume can also be decreased with no additional IC pins, and reduced capacitances of capacitors C 2 and C 3 can facilitate circuit integration.

In the example of FIG. 3 , voltage-current conversion circuit 203 can include comparator I1, switch (e.g., transistor) M4, and resistor Rc. Comparator I1 can compare delayed sampling signal V d against voltage signal V cc , in order to generate comparison signal V c1 . The controlling terminal of switch M4 can receive comparison signal V c1 , and a first power terminal (e.g., drain) of transistor M4 can be coupled to feedback terminal FB of the output voltage of the switching power supply. Resistor Rc can be coupled between the second power terminal (e.g., source) of transistor M4 and ground. Also, a voltage at a common node of switch M4 and resistor Rc can be configured as voltage signal V CC .

In particular embodiments, when voltage signal V CC is less than sampling signal V IO , comparison signal V c1 can be high. As a result, switch M4 can be turned on until voltage signal V CC is equal to sampling signal V IO , which can turn switch/transistor M4 off. Current signal I CC flowing through resistor Rc can be indicated as per formula (8), as shown below.

In normal operation, a voltage at feedback signal FB that represents an output voltage of the switching power supply can be substantially fixed as reference voltage V REF , which can be an expected output voltage of the switching power supply. A resistor divider network including resistors R 1 and R 2 can be employed to obtain a voltage at FB (e.g., a voltage drop across resistor R 1 ) that may represent the present output voltage. Output voltage V O can be regulated by controlling circuit 201 in accordance with output voltage feedback signal FB if there were no transmission voltage loss compensation circuit (e.g., when transistor M4 is off), which can be indicated as below in formula (9).

Here, N 2 and N 3 can respectively represent the numbers of turns of the secondary winding and the auxiliary winding. Because switch M4 is coupled to output voltage feedback signal FB, a voltage drop on resistor R 1 of the resistor divider network due to current signal I CC can be configured as compensation signal V comp , as indicated below in formula (10).

V comp =I CC ×R 1   (10)

In particular embodiments, the output voltage of the switching power supply can be regulated by controlling circuit 201 based on compensation signal V comp and output voltage feedback signal FB. Output voltage V O *at the load can accordingly be indicated as below in formula (11).

Output voltage error can be indicated as below in formula (12) by subtracting formula (9) from formula (11).

Formula (13) can be obtained by inserting formulas (1), (2), and (8) into formula (12), as shown below.

The value of voltage loss generated by transmission of the output voltage to the load can be indicated as I O ×R cable , where R cable can represent an equivalent resistance of the transmission wire(s). The resistance of resistor R 1 of the resistor divider network can be regulated to make the output voltage error substantially equal to a product of I O and R cable . Therefore, the voltage loss of the transmission wire can be offset by an additional voltage value at the load, in order to maintain the voltage at the load as substantially constant at an expected output voltage level.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 3 of 3

In particular embodiments, a compensation signal can be generated in accordance with the output current of the switching power supply. The output voltage of the switching power supply can be regulated in accordance with the compensation signal and output voltage feedback signal. Therefore, the output voltage can be regulated adaptively to match variability of the output current, in order to compensate for voltage loss of the transmission wire(s) from the power supply to the load. In addition, a resistance (e.g., R 1 ) of the resistor divider network in the transmission voltage loss compensation circuit of particular embodiments can be regulated to maintain better adaptability for variable transmission cables, a wider range of application, and improved stability. Further, smaller capacitors and resistors used in this approach can provide advantages of lower cost, lower volume, and better integration performance, as compared to conventional approaches.

In another example, delay circuit 202 can include a resistor and a capacitor coupled in series between the sampling signal V IO and ground. In this case, a common node of this resistor and capacitor can be configured as delayed sampling signal V d . In addition, voltage-current conversion circuit 203 can be implemented via any other suitable circuit configurations, such as other than the exemplified voltage-controlled current source. Further, the power stage of the switching power supply can be implemented in any suitable converter topology (e.g., boost, buck, flyback, etc.).

In one embodiment, a method of compensating for transmission voltage loss from a switching power supply, can include: (i) receiving a sampling signal that represents an output current of the switching power supply; (ii) delaying the sampling signal to generate a delayed sampling signal; (iii) converting the delayed sampling signal to generate a compensation signal; and (iv) regulating an output voltage of the switching power supply based on the compensation signal to compensate for the transmission voltage loss from the output voltage transmission to a load such that a voltage at the load is maintained as substantially consistent with an expected voltage at the load.

Referring now to FIG. 4 , shown is a flow diagram of an example method of compensating for voltage transmission loss from a switching power supply, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. At S 401 , a sampling signal (e.g., V IO ) that represents an output current of the switching power supply can be received (e.g., in delay circuit 202 ). At S 402 , the sampling signal can be delayed, and the delayed sampling signal (e.g., V d ) can be converted to a compensation signal (e.g., via voltage-current conversion circuit 203 ). At S 403 , the output voltage of the switching power supply can be regulated in accordance with the compensation signal, in order to compensate for a voltage loss that occurs due to output voltage transmission from the switching power supply to the load, in order to maintain the voltage at the load as substantially consistent with an expected output voltage.

Generation of the compensation signal can also include converting the delayed sampling signal to a current signal (e.g., by voltage-current conversion circuit 203 ), generating an output voltage feedback signal by a resistor divider network (e.g., including resistors R 1 and R 2 ), and employing the voltage drop generated on the resistor divider network (e.g., across resistor R 1 ) as the compensation signal.

In addition, a controlling chip or IC can also be provided in particular embodiments, where the controlling chip can include controlling circuit 201 and a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit (e.g., including delay circuit 202 and voltage-current conversion circuit 203 ). Of course, other combinations of chips on a printed-circuit board (PCB) and/or other levels of integration, can also be supported in particular embodiments.

Particular embodiments can also include a switching power supply, which can include controlling circuit 201 , a power stage, and a transmission voltage loss compensation circuit (e.g., including delay circuit 202 and voltage-current conversion circuit 203 ), as described herein. The power stage circuit can be any appropriate converter topology structure (e.g., flyback, forward, boost, buck, SEPIC, ZETA, etc.). Similarly, the switching power supply, by use of the above-described voltage compensation circuitry, can provide a compensated output voltage in line with an expected output voltage at the load.

The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilise the invention and various embodiments with modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

›Tables in the description — 7
VIO
=
IP
×
RS
×
Tdis
Ts
(1)
VIO
×
C2
C2
+
C
3⁢
=
VIO
Req
×
TCLK
×
1
C3
(4)
Req
≈
TCLK
C2
(6)
τeq
=
C3
×
TCLK
C2
(7)
ICC
=
VIO
RC
(8)
VO
=
VREF
×
R1
+
R2
R⁢
⁢2
×
N2
N2
(9)
Δ⁢
⁢V
=
2×
RS
×
R1
×
N22
RC
×
N2
×
N3
×
IO
(13)

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

2 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H02M1/00
  • H02M3/335

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2014Jul 2014Oct 2014Jan 2015Apr 2015Jul 2015Oct 2015Jan 2016Apr 2016Jul 2016Oct 2016USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionRequest for continued examinationResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.3 y
857 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Timothy J Dole
art unit 2838 · TC 2800
Citations: 9 back · 9 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock