Wellbore completion for methane hydrate production
Granted 4 Aug 2015 · 1 office action
Assignee: Baker Hughes
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Michael H. Johnson, Mark K. Adam, Bennett M. Richard · Examiner: Zakiya W Bates
Life of the application
9 dated eventsAbstract
In a completion for producing methane the bottom hole assembly has a base pipe with porous media surrounding it for equalizing flow along the base pipe. A shape memory polymer foam surrounds the porous media. The borehole can be reamed to reduce produced methane velocities. Surrounding the shape memory polymer is an exterior layer of consolidated proppant or sand that can self-adhere and/or stick to the polymer foam. The proppant or sand can be circulated or squeezed into position although, circulation is preferred. The borehole may enlarge due to shifting sands in an unconsolidated formation as the methane is produced. The bottom hole assembly helps in fluid flow equalization and protects the foam and layers below from high fluid velocities during production.
Description
5 parts›FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of this invention is completions and more particularly in unconsolidated formations that produce methane hydrate where there is a need for sand control and flow distribution to protect the screen while stabilizing the borehole.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Methane hydrate exists as a solid substance in layers that contain sand and other sediment. Hydrate to methane gas and water must be accomplished in order to produce the methane gas. The production of methane hydrate means dissociating methane hydrate in the layers and collecting the resultant methane gas through wells and production systems. To dissociate methane hydrate that is stable at low temperature and under high pressure, there must be an (1) increase the temperature , (2) decrease the pressure, (3) or both. The optimum methane hydrate production method is one based on the “depressurization method.” However, since methane hydrate layers are unconsolidated sediments, sand production occurs with the methane gas and water. Because removal of the methane, water, and sand, wellbore stability becomes an issue that cannot be overcome with conventional sand control methodologies. Economical and effective measures for preventing sand production and solving borehole stability issues require a novel approach to completion methodology. The proposed method to control sand production and provide better borehole stability comprises providing a shape memory polymer foam filter that does not depend on the borehole for containment for sand management. The shape memory polymer will be utilized such that a flow path would not be exposed that would permit the production of sand from the borehole. One other issue related to the “depressurization method” of methane hydrate production is the uniform application of a differential pressure across the reservoir interface. The method further comprises a porous media under the shaped memory polymer foam filter that can be varied in number and permeability to balance the differential pressure applied to reservoir being produced. This improves borehole stability via uniform drawdown and flow from the exposed reservoir. While these techniques could be used in a conventional open hole or cased hole completion, it is desirable to under ream or expand the borehole size to help increase reservoir exposure and decrease flow velocities at the sand management/reservoir interface. Additionally, consolidated proppant or sand is deposited adjacent the shape memory foam as it is not the objective to fully occupy the borehole with the foam after it crosses its critical temperature. Instead, in recognition that the hole can be enlarged with initial reaming to reduce fluid velocities or alternatively additional methane production destabilizes the formation and can enlarge the borehole, the consolidated proppant or sand can be an outer protective layer to the foam. Its ability to self-adhere contains the foam and protects the foam from erosive velocity effects of the produced methane.
Several references that employ memory foam in sand control applications are as follows:
WO/2011/162895A; U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,346 US20110252781 WO/2011/133319A2 US20130062067 WO/2013/036446A1 US20130126170 U.S. Pat. No. 8,048,348 US20100089565 US20110162780 U.S. Pat. No. 7,926,565 WO/2010/045077A2 US20110067872 WO/2011/037950A2 U.S. Pat. No. 7,832,490 US20080296023 US20080296020 U.S. Pat. No. 7,743,835 WO/2008/151311A3
Flow balancing devices are generally discussed in the following references:
U.S. Pat. No. 7,954,546 U.S. Pat. No. 7,578,343 U.S. Pat. No. 8,225,863 U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,022 U.S. Pat. No. 7,921,915
Those skilled in the art will better appreciate additional aspects of the invention from a review of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while appreciating that the full scope of the invention is to be determined by the appended claims.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a completion for producing methane the bottom hole assembly has a base pipe with porous media within it for equalizing flow along the base pipe. A shape memory polymer foam surrounds the base pipe with porous media. The borehole can be reamed to reduce produced methane velocities. Surrounding the shape memory polymer is an exterior layer of consolidated proppant or sand that can self-adhere and/or stick to the polymer foam. The proppant or sand can be circulated or squeezed into position although, circulation is preferred. The borehole may enlarge due to shifting sands in an unconsolidated formation as the methane is produced. The bottom hole assembly helps in fluid flow equalization and protects the foam and layers below from high fluid velocities during production.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the run in position of the bottom hole assembly with the shape memory polymer foam as yet unexpanded;
FIG. 2 is the view of FIG. 1 with the polymer foam expanded;
FIG. 3 is the view of FIG. 2 with the consolidated proppant or gravel in position; and
FIG. 4 is the view of FIG. 3 showing the shifting of the unconsolidated borehole wall during methane production.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1 a work string 1 is run through a wellhead 2 . The bottom hole assembly comprises a base pipe 5 which is simply a pipe with openings. A production packer 6 isolates the methane hydrate reservoir 4 . A schematically illustrated crossover tool 11 allows placement of the consolidated proppant or sand (gravel) 9 about the shape memory polymer foam 3 . The base pipe 5 has flow balancing devices 7 that can be tortuous paths of different resistances to fluid flow or an annularly shaped porous member of different thicknesses or porosities.
In FIG. 1 the memory polymer foam is in its run in dimension where it has not yet been warmed above its transition temperature. In FIG. 2 the transition temperature has been reached and the polymer foam 3 has expanded to a location still short of the borehole wall 12 to leave an annular gap 14 into which the proppant or sand 9 will be deposited using the crossover 11 as illustrated in FIG. 3 . This is done preferably with circulation with crossover 11 and using a wash pipe that is not shown to direct returns that come through the proppant/sand 9 and the memory foam 3 into the upper annulus 8 above the packer 6 . Finally FIG. 4 illustrates the onset of methane production that ensues when the pressure in the formation 4 is allowed to be reduced. With the removal of methane a large void volume 10 can be created. This has the beneficial effect of reduction of fluid velocities for the methane. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the initial deposition of the proppant or sand 9 could likely fill the remaining annular space around the memory foam 3 by virtue of the addition of the proppant or sand 9 until some pressure resistance is sensed at the surface indicating that the volume in the annulus has packed in. The arrows 20 and 22 schematically illustrate the circulation pattern to deliver the proppant or sand 9 below the packer 6 and taking returns through the upper annulus 8 . The delivery of the proppant or sand 9 can begin before, during or after the foam 3 reaches its critical temperature and grows dimensionally. In any of those cases the production of methane can hollow out the reservoir as shown in FIG. 4 so the adherence of the proppant or sand 9 to itself and to the foam helps to keep the components within the foam 3 protected from erosive high gas velocities. The enlarging of the borehole as well as the flow balancing devices 7 also helps to control high velocity gas erosion to keep the bottom hole assembly serviceable for a longer time before a workover is needed.
The combination of flow balancing with the self-adhering proppant or sand 9 covering the memory polymer foam 3 and to some extent adhering to the foam allows for a longer service life as the layers of filtration remain serviceable longer in adverse conditions such as borehole collapse and potential for erosion caused at least in part by flow imbalance induced high gas velocities.
The proppant/sand 9 can be a commercially available product such as Sandtrol®. The foam is available as GeoFORM®. Alternatives can be alloy memory foam or screens of various designs that do not change dimension with thermal stimulus. The screens can be constructed so that they can be radially expanded for borehole support or to reduce the volume needed for the proppant/sand 9 . The flow balancing feature can be a porous annular shape or insert plugs in the base pipe or screen materials that vary in mesh size at different opening locations.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Claims as granted
12 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
3 codes- E21B43/10
- E21B43/08
- E21B43/12
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock