Method for controlling a gas turbine

This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/052094 filed Feb. 8, 2012 and claims benefit thereof, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The International Application claims priority to the European Patent Office application No. 11154149.6 EP filed Feb. 11, 2011, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The invention relates to a method for regulating a gas turbine, wherein measurement signal values are measured at different points in time, namely at at least a first point in time and a second point in time, wherein the first point in time is located before the second point in time and wherein attenuated signal values are generated from the measurement signal values, in that the measured measurement signal values undergo smoothing by an attenuation factor.

A gas turbine is a turbo machine which generally comprises a compressor, a turbine and a combustor section. Ambient air which has been sucked in is compressed in the compressor and the compressed air is ultimately supplied to the combustor section. Arranged in the combustor section is at least one combustion chamber, mostly having a plurality of burners to which the compressed air is supplied. In addition to the compressed air, a fuel is also supplied to the burners which mixes with the air and is combusted. The resulting hot combustion gases are supplied to the turbine where they expand and cool down, thereby allowing the turbine to rotate. In so doing, the thermal energy from the combustion gases is converted into mechanical activity which on the one hand is used to drive the compressor and on the other hand is used to drive a load, for example of a generator for generating electricity.

It must be ensured that a stable flame is present during combustion in the combustion chamber. Flame instabilities occur in particular due to resonant combustion oscillations in the combustion gas and can lead on the one hand to increased pollutant emissions and on the other hand to oscillations and vibrations of the combustion chamber, which adversely affect the service life of the combustion chamber and shortens intervals between maintenance.

The combustion stability of gas turbines and other combustion plants is usually assessed using measurement signals, the timing of which fluctuates highly. These can be for instance measurement signals resulting from acceleration or pressure amplitude measurement on the combustion chamber. In order to suppress unwanted high-frequency components, the measurement signals are usually attenuated. However, peaks frequently occur at specific intervals over the height course of the measurement. This can also be referred to as a “picket fence” course. Between the peaks, the height drops to a completely non-critical value. A single peak also remains non-critical. Should the peaks repeat however, and if either the height of the peaks increases or the succession of peaks becomes more frequent, this indicates an incipient instability.

Up to now, what are known as peak hold value signals, also known as peak hold signals, have mostly been used for regulation. Here, only the maximum occurring height is relayed as a signal value for a defined time period. However, this signal does not provide any information about the frequency of the peaks. If the time window is large, a critical, high amplitude value is transmitted to the regulator, although under certain circumstances, only an individual, non-hazardous peak was present. If the time window is very small, so that per time period one peak is expected at the most, high and low signals alternate in rapid succession, resulting in an unsettled and often very inefficient regulation.

The object of the invention is to provide a method for regulating a gas turbine which avoids the disadvantages described above.

According to the invention, this object is achieved by the provision of a method for regulating a gas turbine wherein measurement signal values are measured at different points in time, namely at at least a first point in time and a second point in time. In this case the first point in time is located before the second point in time. Attenuated signal values are generated from the measurement signal values, in that the measured measurement signal values undergo smoothing by an attenuation factor. Depending on the difference in the measurement signal value at the second point in time and the attenuated signal value at the first point in time, a different attenuation factor is used. Signal values are thereby formed which react to the amplitude height as well as the repetition frequency of the peaks. Efficient regulation is thereby possible. The smoothing is an exponential smoothing. This allows a particularly effective smoothing of time series values, which show no systemization.

Advantageous developments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.

The attenuated signal value is advantageously formed from the sum of two products, wherein the first product is the multiplication of the attenuation factor and the measurement signal value measured at the second point in time and the second product is the multiplication of the differential value one minus the attenuation factor and the attenuated signal value at the first point in time. This is particularly simple to realize.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, a higher attenuation factor (=low attenuation) is used if the measurement signal value measured at the second point in time is larger or the same as the attenuated signal value at the first point in time, than if the measurement signal value measured at the second point in time is smaller than the attenuated signal value at the first point in time.

The ascent of a suddenly occurring peak therefore provides for a weak attenuation, in other words the attenuation factor is high so the attenuated signal values rise sharply during the ascent of the peak. When the peak drops, a strong attenuation is triggered, in other words the attenuation factor is low. The attenuated signal values therefore only drop slowly.

Other features, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of an exemplary embodiment with reference to the accompanying FIGURE.

The FIGURE shows a diagram in which the measurement signal, the attenuated signal value according to the prior art and the attenuated signal value according to the invention are plotted over time t.

The FIGURE shows a curve 1 with measurement signal values which were plotted over time t. The course of the measurement signal 1 has peaks 4 which initially occur every two to three seconds or so. Measurement signal values of above around 2.0 are seen here once as critical. If the repetition frequency of these peaks 4 is correspondingly high, a corrective action should take place. Between the time t=14 and the time t=19, the number of peaks 4 increases. At the time t=19 a change of the operating state was effected. The curve 1 along with the measurement signal values subsequently shows a sufficiently smooth course.

In the curve 2 the attenuated signal values according to the prior art are generated from the measurement signal values of the curve 1 which are plotted over time t. The high-frequency components are avoided through the attenuation according to the prior art. The curve 2 does however drop off sharply over and over again between the peaks 4 . For the signal values attenuated according to the prior art in curve 2 , no value can be provided however which is decisively unambiguously critical or non-critical: Values between 0.95 and 1.15 occur in the critical phase up to the time t=19 as well as in the non-critical phase thereafter. Efficient regulation is therefore not possible.

The curve 3 was generated by the inventive method. In this case, measurement signal values M n1 , M n2 are measured at different points in time n1, n2, namely at at least a first point in time n1 and a second point in time n2, wherein the first point in time n1 is located before the second point in time n2. The measured measurement signal values M n1 and M n2 undergo an exponential smoothing with an attenuation factor λ. This allows the generation of signal values S n1 and S n2 . In this case a higher attenuation factor λ is used if the measurement signal value M n2 measured at the second point in time n2 is larger or the same as the attenuated signal value S n1 at the first point in time n1, than if the measurement signal value M n2 measured at the second point n2 in time is smaller than the attenuated signal value S n1 at the first point in time n1.

This exponential smoothing is indicated by the following formula:

S n2 =λ x *M n2 +(1−λ x )* S n1 where x= 1.2

wherein:

x=2 if M n2 ≧S n1

x=1 if M n2 <S n1

where λ 2 >λ 1

Wherein λ x , x=1.2 is the attenuation factor, M n2 the measured measurement signal value at the point in time n2, M n1 the measured measurement signal value at the point in time n1, S n1 the attenuated signal value at the point in time n1 and S n2 the attenuated signal value at the point in time n1.

In the inventive attenuated signal values in the exemplary embodiment, λ 2 =0.3 and λ 1 =0.05 are selected by way of example. Following a peak 4 , an inventively attenuated signal value drops off in curve 3 significantly more slowly than is the case for a signal value in curve 2 attenuated according to a prior art method. This results in the inventively attenuated signal value reaching higher values in the chronologically subsequent peak 4 than the signal value attenuated according to the prior art. In terms of regulation, this is often a desired effect. Between the time t=14 and the time t=19, the frequency of the peaks 4 increases. Here it can be observed that the inventively attenuated signal values in the very critical time window remain above 1.5, while the signal values attenuated according to the prior art in curve 2 drop once again to almost 1.0. In the critical time between t=0 and t=19 on the other hand, the inventively attenuated signal values never drop below 1.3 and subsequently never rises above 1.16 in the non-critical time. A suddenly occurring peak 4 therefore provides in its ascent for a weak attenuation, i.e. the attenuation factor 2 is high and the attenuated signal values will therefore rapidly rise during the ascent of the peak. As the peak 4 drops, a switch to a strong attenuation is triggered, i.e. the attenuation factor 2 is low. The attenuated signal values therefore only drop off slowly. Efficient regulation of a gas turbine can therefore be accomplished with the inventive method which reacts quickly to a peak (by switching to weak attenuation) but also evaluates a rapid succession of peaks as more critical than individual peaks.