USPatent applicationPatented

Biomarkers for asthma

Granted 9 Aug 2016 · 4 office actions

Assignee: Cleveland Clinic

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Satish Kalhan, Suzy Comhair, Stanley Hazen · Examiner: Nora Rooney · AU 1644 · TC 1600

Life of the application

14 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom201220142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The present invention provides methods, kits, and compositions related to testing a sample for the level of a biomarker related to asthma, wherein the biomarker is selected from: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide. In certain embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify therapy effective for treating asthma. In other embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma. In further embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to monitor the response to on-going therapy (e.g., adjust the dosage of the asthma therapy).

Description

9 parts
›The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional…

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional application 61/646,609, filed May 14, 2012, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

This invention was made with government support under grant numbers T35 HL082544 and P01 HL103453 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods, kits, and compositions related to testing a sample for the level of a biomarker related to asthma, wherein the biomarker is selected from: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide. In certain embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify therapy effective for treating asthma. In other embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma. In further embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to monitor the response to on-going therapy (e.g., adjust the dosage of the asthma therapy).

›BACKGROUND

Approximately 38.4 million Americans have been diagnosed with asthma by a health professional during their lifetime. This chronic inflammatory disease places a significant burden on both the health care system and individual patients, with annual expenditures for health and lost productivity due to asthma estimated at over $20 billion. In spite of high morbidity and costs, most asthmatic patients have mild-to-moderate disease and about 5-8% of asthmatic patients fall into the category of “chronic severe asthma” (CSA). Asthmatic patients have significant reduction in quality of life as a result of their asthma, have frequent hospital admissions and emergency visits, and account for a much larger percentage of overall health care costs. Clinically, asthma is characterized by a component of irreversible airflow obstruction and peripheral airways disease, ongoing mediator release and a reduced association with atopy. There is currently no way to predict whether an individual patient with asthma will be stable over time, or exhibit declining lung function that leads to development of CSA.

Current asthma treatment and diagnosis are predominantly clinically based, or use pulmonary function testing, which is expensive, can only occur in specialized pulmonary function testing laboratories, and is inconvenient. Exhaled breath NO is another recent test used in asthma, but it lacks specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis and monitoring of asthma treatment/severity. Further, it is not readily collected and sent to laboratory for testing, like most other diagnostic tests. Rather, it takes specialized instrumentation to be located on-site for testing. Simple reliable and objective quantitative measures of blood or urine based tests for the diagnosis of asthma, and for predicting risk of exacerbation, need for therapeutic titration, or monitoring of response to therapeutic interventions, are needed.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods, kits, and compositions related to testing a sample for the level of a biomarker related to asthma, wherein the biomarker is selected from: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide. In certain embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify therapy effective for treating asthma. In other embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma. In further embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to monitor the response to on-going therapy (e.g., adjust the dosage of the asthma therapy).

In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of identifying an efficacious asthma therapy for a subject comprising: a) testing a sample from a subject to determine the level of at least one biomarker selected from the group consisting of: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide; and b) identifying an asthma therapy that is effective for treating asthma in the subject based on the level of the at least one biomarker that is determined.

In certain embodiments, the at least one biomarker comprises taurine or arachidonate and the asthma therapy comprises a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) (e.g., montelukast, zafirlukast, Pranlukast and zileuton). In further embodiments, the asthma therapy is administered to the subject. In particular embodiments, the at least one biomarker comprises taurine and the asthma therapy that is administered comprises a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA). In particular embodiments, the asthma therapy comprises a non-steroidal asthma medication. In some embodiments, the asthma therapy comprises a steroidal asthma medication. In certain embodiments, the sample comprises a blood sample, plasma sample, or urine sample (or any other biological sample) from the subject.

In particular embodiments, the present invention provides methods of identifying the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma in a subject comprising: a) testing a sample from a subject to determine the level of at least one biomarker selected from the group consisting of: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide; and b) identifying the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma in the subject based on an elevated level of the at least one biomarker.

In certain embodiments, the methods further comprise administering an asthma therapy to the subject. In other embodiments, the methods further comprise informing the subject that they have asthma, the severity of the asthma, and/or the risk of exacerbating the asthma. In particular embodiments, the severity includes: 1) declining lung function, and 2) stable, non-declining lung function.

In some embodiments, the at least one biomarker comprises taurine. In further embodiments, the elevated level of the at least one biomarker is higher than a control level. In particular embodiments, the control level is determined or pre-determined from: i) a sample from the subject when not suffering from symptoms of asthma, ii) a sample from a person, or sample from a plurality of people, without asthma, iii) samples from the general population. In further embodiments, the sample comprises a blood sample, plasma sample, or urine sample from the subject.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of monitoring response to asthma therapy comprising: a) testing a sample from a subject receiving asthma therapy to determine the level of at least one biomarker selected from the group consisting of: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide; and b) adjusting, or continuing un-adjusted, the asthma therapy based on the level of the at least one biomarker that is determined.

In certain embodiments, the sample comprises a blood sample, plasma sample, or urine sample from the subject. In other embodiments, the at least one biomarker comprises taurine or arachidonate and the asthma therapy comprises a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) (e.g., montelukast, zafirlukast, Pranlukast and zileuton). In certain embodiments, the present invention provides methods of treating asthma comprising: administering to a subject with asthma an inhibitor of at least one biomarker selected from the group consisting of: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide. In particular embodiments, the inhibitor comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of: an antibody or fragment thereof, small molecule, antisense, siRNA, or micro-RNA.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 . Maltose, Maltotriose and Taurine in plasma of Control (n=10), non severe (n=10) and severe (n=10) asthmatic individuals. Asthmatic subjects have increased Maltose, Maltotriose and Taurine levels as compared to controls (* T-test, p<0.05).

FIGS. 2A and 2B . Correlations of plasma Maltotriose with airflow (% FEV1 and AFEV1). Maltotriose is directly correlated with hyperresponsiveness, as determined by change in FEV1 following Beta-agonist (R=0.602, p=0.002; controls, n=9; non-severe, n=7; and severe, n=8) whereas Maltotriose is inversely correlated with % FEV1 (R=−0.387, p=0.034; controls, n=10; non-severe, n=10; and severe, n=10).

FIG. 3 . Correlations of plasma Taurine with airflow as measured by % FEV1. Taurine is inversely correlated with % FEV1 (R=−0.410, p=0.0414; controls, n=10; non-severe, n=9; and severe, n=9).

FIG. 4 . Correlation of plasma Maltotriose with Quality of life as measured by the Juniper questionnaire. The Juniper questionnaire data suggest subjects with high levels of Maltotriose have a lower total quality of life score than subjects with low levels of Maltotriose. (R=−0.495, p=0.014; controls, n=10; non-severe, n=9; and severe, n=9).

FIGS. 5A and 5B . Health care utilization is related to Maltose levels in plasma. Asthmatic subjects with high levels of Maltose are associated with increased unscheduled doctor visits due to breathing problems (p<0.05) (unscheduled visits: no, n=5, yes, n=14). High levels of Maltose are associated with increased utilization of rescue medication (* T-test, p<0.05) (increased utilization of rescue medication: No, n=8; Yes, n=8).

FIG. 6 . Health care utilization is related to Taurine levels in plasma. Asthmatic subjects with high levels of Taurine are associated increased utilization of rescue medication (* T-test, p<0.05) (increased utilization of rescue medication: No, n=8; Yes=8).

FIG. 7 . Increased adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) in plasma of non severe (n=10) and severe (n=10) asthmatic individuals as compared to control (n=10) subjects. Asthmatic subjects have increased adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) levels as compared to controls (* T-test, p<0.05).

FIG. 8 . Increased Arachidonate and Nicotinamide in plasma of non severe (n=10) and severe (n=10) asthmatic individuals as compared to control (n=10) subjects. Arachidonate and Nicotinamide levels as compared to controls (* T-test, p<0.05).

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides methods, kits, and compositions related to testing a sample for the level of a biomarker related to asthma, wherein the biomarker is selected from: taurine, maltose, maltotriose, adenosine 5′-monophosphate, phosphoethanolamine, glycerophosphorylcholine, arachidonate, heptanoate, pelargonate, and nicotinamide. In certain embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify therapy effective for treating asthma. In other embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to identify the presence, severity, or risk of exacerbation of asthma. In further embodiments, the level of the biomarker is used to monitor the response to on-going therapy (e.g., adjust the dosage of the asthma therapy).

The present invention is noted limited to any particular method to measure the biomarkers of the present invention. In certain embodiments, the biomarkers are measured within plasma, serum or blood, or non-invasively through urine.

Work conducted during the development of the present invention identified increased levels of biomarkers, such as taurine, maltose, maltotriose, and AMP, as associated with asthma. While the present invention is noted limited to any particular mechanism, and an understanding of the mechanism is not necessary to practice the invention, it may be that the significant increase in taurine levels in asthmatic subjects may be mechanistically linked to asthma via up-regulation of the leukotriene pathway. It is thus remarkable that leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are currently used in clinical practice to treat asthma but are only effective in approximately 20% of asthmatic patients and, until the present invention there was no way to predict who will respond to LTRAs. Use of systemic levels of taurine to help identify those who will benefit from LTRAs, or to monitor therapeutic effect and dose adjustments, is a beneficial application of taurine levels in the treatment monitoring of asthma. Taurine may thus be used for a more tailored, individualized approach to asthma management. Asthma medications in general have wide variations in efficacy and additional information about who will respond to LTRAs vs alternative agents can have important clinical implications and assist in clinical decision making.

Word conducted during development of embodiments of the present invention also found that plasma, serum and blood based levels of adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP), maltose and maltotriose are higher is asthmatics subjects as compared to controls, which suggest derangements in the cellular energetic pathways and a possible response to altered membrane integrity in response to inflammation. As such, these markers may also serve as diagnostic and prognostic indicators of asthma presence, risk for exacerbation, and as targets for monitoring asthma related therapies.

The quantification of the biomarkers of the present invention can be achieved using any suitable methodology, including but not limited to mass spectrometry, HPLC/UV or HPLC/Vis, and other analytical approaches.

In certain embodiments, as part of the methods of the present invention, a patient is administered or recommended for administration steroidal therapeutic agents for treating asthma or other condition. Table 1 below list exemplary steroidal therapeutic agents. In other embodiments, a patient is administered or recommended for administration non-steroidal therapeutic agents. Table 2 provides exemplary therapeutic agents.

EXAMPLES
›Example 1

Asthma Biomarker Identification

This Examples describes methods used to identify biomarkers of asthma in patient samples.

Methods

The plasma profiles of 10 asthmatic subjects and 10 healthy controls were examined using an untargeted global metabolomic analysis. The metabolic profiling platform was composed of ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHKC/MS/MS) and gas chromatography (GC/MS). Amino acid concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP v.9.0.0 (SAS Inc. Cary, N.C.).

Taurine, adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP), maltose and maltitriose concentrations were determined by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS/MS) and gas chromatography (GC/MS). UPLC/MS was carried out using a Waters Acquity UHPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.) coupled to an LTQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Mass.) equipped with an electrospray ionization source. Two separate UHPLC/MS injections were performed on each sample: one optimized for positive ions and one for negative ions. Derivatized samples for GC/MS were analyzed on a Thermo-Finnigan Trace DSQ fast-scanning single-quadrupole MS operated unit mass resolving power. Chromatographic separation followed by full scan mass spectra was carried to record retention time, molecular time (m/z) and MS/MS of all detectable ions presented in the samples.

A log transformation was applied to the observed relative concentrations for each biochemical to account for variance increasing as a function of a biochemical's average response. Student's t-tests were used to compare groups with equal variance; Welch's t-tests were used to compare groups with unequal variance.

Results

Of the 293 metabolites, 15 metabolites were significantly increased in asthma as compared to healthy control subjects (all p<0.05). General categories of the metabolites included the carbohydrate and lipid metabolic pathways. Linear glycogen polymers maltose and maltotriose were increased 3- and 4-fold, respectively, in asthma as compared to controls (see Figures). Asthmatics had increased lipid metabolites, including 2-fold increase in glycerolipid metabolites phosphoethanolamine and glycerophosphorylcholine, 1.4-fold increase in the long-chain fatty acid arachidonate as well as 1.4-fold increase in the medium-chain fatty acids heptanoate and pelargonate (see Figures). Purine analyses showed 2.7-fold increase in adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) (see Figures). The cofactor nicotinamide (NAD+) was 2.2-fold higher in asthma (see Figures). Amino acids were similar between groups, except taurine, which was 2-fold higher in asthma (see Figures).

Lipid Metabolites in Plasma of Controls (N=10) and all Asthmatic Subjects (Non-Severe and Severe Asthma)

›CONCLUSIONS

Asthmatic individuals have unique plasma metabolite levels that distinguish them from healthy controls and indicate activation of specific inflammatory pathways. For example, high levels of arachidonate and taurine are consistent with greater activation of the leukotriene pathway in asthma. Phospholipase-A2 generates arachidonic acid which controls a selective, volume-sensitive osmolyte transporter that modulates intracellular taurine efflux into plasma. Thus, plasma taurine can serve as a biomarker for activation of the leukotriene pathway. Also, while the present invention is not limited to any particular mechanism, and an understanding of the mechanism is not necessary to practice the present invention, the general increase in glycerolipid substrate may enable the greater arachidonic acid production. In contrast, elevated maltose, maltotriose, AMP and NAD+ suggest derangements in the cellular energetic pathways. Inefficient cellular energetics might explain the increase in plasma levels of linear glycogen polymers.

All publications and patents mentioned in the present application are herein incorporated by reference. Various modification and variation of the described methods and compositions of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention that are obvious to those skilled in the relevant fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

›Tables in the description — 3
TABLE 1 — Steroidal Drugs
Generic NameChemical NameBrand Name
Beclomethasone9-chloro-11β,17,21-trihydroxy-16βmethylpregna-1,4-QVAR
Dipropionate HFAdiene-3,20-dione 17,21-dipropionate.Inhalation
Aerosol 40 mcg/
puff & 80 mcg/
puff
Budesonide16,17-(butylidenebis(oxy))-11,21-dihydroxy-, (11-Plumicort
β,16-α)-pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dioneFlexhaler &
Plumicort
Respules
Budesonide in(RS)-11β,16α,17,21-Tetrahydroxypregna-1,4-diene-Symbicort
combination with3,20-dione cyclic 16,17-acetal with butyraldehyde
Formoterol(Budesonide)
(R*,R*)-(±)-N-[2-hydroxy-5-[1-hydroxy-2-[[2-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-1-
methylethyl]amino]ethyl]phenyl]formamide, (E)-2-
butendioate(2:1), dihydrate
Ciclesonide2-[(1S,2S,4R,8S,9S,11S,12S,13R)-6-cyclohexyl-Alvesco
11-hydroxy-9,13-dimethyl-16-oxo-5,7-Inhalation
dioxapentacyclo [10.8.0.02,9.04,8.013,18] icosa-14,Aerosol
17-dien-8-yl]-2-oxoethyl 2-methylpropanoate
Flunisolide(1S,2S,4R,8S,9S,11S,12S,13R,19S)-19-fluoro-11-Aerobid Aerosol
hydroxy-8-(2-hydroxyacetyl)-6,6,9,13-tetramethyl-5,7-and Aerobid-M
dioxapentacyclo[10.8.0.02,9.04,8.013,18]icosa-14,17-Aerosol
dien-16-one
FluticasoneS-(fluoromethyl)-6α,9-difluoro-11β,17-dihydroxy-Flovent HFA
Propionate16α-methyl-3-oxoandrosta-1,4-diene-17β-and Flovent
carbothioate, 17-propanoateDiskus
Fluticasone inS-(fluoromethyl)-6α,9-difluoro-11β,17-dihydroxy-Advair Diskus &
combination with16α-methyl-3-oxoandrosta-1,4-diene-17β-Advair HFA
Salmeterolcarbothioate, 17-propanoate [and] (RS)-2-
(broncodialator)(hydroxymethyl)-4-{1-hydroxy-2-[6-(4-phenylbutoxy)
hexylamino]ethyl}phenol
Mometasone furoate(11β,16α)-9,21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3,20-Asmanex
dioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl 2-furoateTwisthaler
Mometasone in(11β,16α)-9,21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3,20-Dulera
combination withdioxopregna-1,4-dien-17-yl 2-furoate [and] rac-(R,R)-
FormoterolN-[2-hydroxy-5-[1-hydroxy-2-[1-(4-methoxyphenyl)
(broncodialtor)propan-2-ylamino]ethyl] phenyl]formamide
Triamcinolone(4aS,4bR,5S,6aS,6bS,9aR,10aS,10bS)-4b-fluoro-6b-Azmacort
acetonideglycoloyl-5-hydroxy-4a,6a,8,8-tetramethyl-Inhalation
4a,4b,5,6,6a,6b,9a,10,10a,10b,11,12-dodecahydro-2H-Aerosol
naphtho[2′,1′:4,5]indeno[1,2-d][1,3]dioxol-2-one
Prednisone17,21-dihydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,11,20-trioneDeltasone
Prednisolone(11β)-11,17,21-trihydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione
Methylprednisolone(1S,2R,8S,10S,11S,14R,15S,17S)-14,17-dihydroxy-Medrol, Solu-
14-(2-hydroxyacetyl)-2,8,15-Medrol, Depo-
trimethyltetracyclo[8.7.0.02,7.011,15]heptadeca-3,6-Medrol
dien-5-one
Dexamethasone(8S,9R,10S,11S,13S,14S,16R,17R)-9-Fluoro-11,17-Decadron
dihydroxy-17-(2-hydroxyacetyl)-10,13,16-trimethyl-
6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-
cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one
TABLE 2 — Non-Steroidal Drugs
Generic NameChemical NameBrand NameType
Albuterol Sulfateα1 [(tert-butylamino) methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-VoSpireERLABA -
xylene-α,α′-diol sulfate (2:1) (salt)Extendedrecommended
Release Tabletswith use with
steroids
Formoterol±)-2-hydroxy-5-[(1RS)-1-hydroxy-2-[[(1RS)-2-ForadilLABA -
fumarate(4-methoxyphenyl)-1methylethyl]-Aerolizerrecommended
amino]ethyl]formanilide fumarate dihydratewith use with
steroids
Salmeterol±-4-Hydroxy-α1-[[[6-(4-Serevent DiskusLABA -
Xinafoatephenylbutoxy)hexyl]amino]methyl]-1,3-recommended
benzenedimethanol compd. with 1-hydroxy-2-with use with
naphthalenecarboxylic acid (1:1)steroids
Albuterol Sulfateα1-[(tertbutylamino) methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-ProAir HFA,SABA - rescue
HFAxylene-α,α′-diol sulfate (2:1) (salt)Proventil HFA,medicine
Ventolin HFA
Albuterol Sulfateα1 [(tert-butylamino) methyl]-4-hydroxy-m-SABA - rescue
Inhalationxylene-α,α′-diol sulfate (2:1) (salt)medicine
Solution
Albuterol Sulfateα1 [(tert-butylamino) methyl]-4-hydroxy-AccuNebSABA - rescue
Nebulizermxylene-α,α′-diol sulfate (2:1) (salt)Inhalationmedicine
SoluctionSolution,
Albuterol
Sulfate 0.5%
Ipratropium[8-methyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-8-Combivent;Anticholinergic
Bromide inazoniabicyclo[3.2.1] oct-3-yl] 3-hydroxy-2-DuoNeb
combination withphenyl-propanoate [and] α1 [(tert-butylamino)
Albuterol Sulfatemethyl]-4-hydroxy-mxylene-α,α′-diol sulfate
(2:1) (salt)
Ipratropium[8-methyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-8-Atrovent,Anticholinergic
Bromide HFAazoniabicyclo[3.2.1] oct-3-yl] 3-hydroxy-2-Apovent and
phenyl-propanoateAerovent
Levalbuterol HCl(R)-α1-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]methyl]-4-Xopenex;SABA - rescue
hydroxy-1,3-benzenedimethanol hydrochlorideXopenex HFAmedicine
Pirbuterol(RS)-6-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-hydroxyethyl]-2-MaxairSABA - rescue
(hydroxymethyl)pyridin-3-olAutoinhalermedicine
Tiotropium(1α,2β,4β,5α,7β)-7-[(Hydroxydi-2-SpirivaSABA - rescue
Bromidethienylacetyl)oxy]-9,9-dimethyl-3-oxa-9-HandiHalermedicine
Inhalationazoniatricyclo[3.3.1.02,4]nonane bromide
Powdermonohydrate
Terbutaline(RS)-5-[2-(tert-butylamino)-1-Brethine,SABA - rescue
hydroxyethyl]benzene-1,3-diolBricanyl,medicine
Brethaire,
Terbulin
Cromolyndisodium 5,5′-[(2-Intal, IntalNon-steroid anti-
Sodiumhydroxytrimethylene)dioxy]bis[4-oxo-4H-1-Metered Doseinflammatory
benzopyran-2-carboxylate]Inhaler
Theophylline1H-Purine-2,6-dione,3,7-dihydro,1,3-dimethyl-Uniphyl,Non-steroid anti-
Elixophyllin,inflammatory
Theo-24, Theo-
Time,
Theochron
Montelukast(S,E)-2-(1-((1-(3-(2-(7-chloroquinolin-2-Singular,Leukotriene
yl)vinyl)phenyl)-3-(2-(2-hydroxypropan-2-Montelo-10receptor
yl)phenyl)propylthio)methyl)cyclopropyl)aceticantagonist
acid(LTRA)
Zafirlukastcyclopentyl 3-{2-methoxy-4-[(o-Accolate,Leukotriene
tolylsulfonyl)carbamoyl]benzyl}-1-methyl-1H-Accoleit,receptor
indol-5-ylcarbamateVanticonantagonist
(LTRA)
ZileutonN-[1-(1-benzothien-2-yl)ethyl]-N-hydroxyureaZyflo, Zyflo CRLeukotriene
receptor
antagonist
(LTRA)
OmalizumabAccession Number DB00043XolairHumanized
Antibody
Dyphylline7-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-theophyllineLufyllinBroncodilator
Dyphylline in7-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-theophylline [and]COPD; Lufyllin-Broncodilator and
combination with(RS)-3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propane-1,2-diolGGexpectorant
Guaifenesin
Data are represented as mean (SE). The lipid metabolites are presented as scaled imputed Intensity.
ControlAsthma
Scaled imputed Intensity(N = 10)(N = 20)
phosphoethanolamine0.47 (0.1)0.86 (0.1)P = 0.03
glycerophosphorylcholine0.81 (0.101.34 (0.1)P = 0
006
heptanoate0.81 (0.101.21 (0.08)P = 0.04
pelargonate0.91 (0.1)1.21 (0.1)P = 0.06
1 of 9 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

3 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K31/395
  • A61K31/40
  • A61B5/145
  • A61K47/18
Section G — Physics
  • G01N33/493
  • G01N33/49
  • G01N33/483

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionRequest for continued examinationResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.2 y
1,183 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
after a restriction
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Nora Rooney
art unit 1644 · TC 1600
Citations: 14 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock