USPatent applicationPatented

Servo marginalization

Granted 9 Jun 2015 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED · originally Broadcom

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Bruce A. Wilson, Haitao Xia, Lu Lu · Examiner: Dismery Mercedes · AU 2688 · TC 2600

Life of the application

20 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Servo channel noise limits are defined through Viterbi decisions based on servo gate signals. Y values are used to produce a first Viterbi decision at each servo gate. Viterbi decisions and Y values are used to produce ideal Y values. Y values and ideal Y values are used to produce an error value which is adjusted by a noise factor based on estimated channel characteristics. The noise value is combined with Y values and used to produce a second Viterbi decision at each servo gate.

Description

5 parts
›PRIORITY

The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/776,077, filed Mar. 11, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In a hard disk drive, noise in the servo channel introduces errors. Values from the servo channel are used to produce a Viterbi decision pertaining to error handling, but no function exists to test servo error marginalization. Testing servo error marginalization could be used to improve performance of the servo system.

Consequently, it would be advantageous if an apparatus existed that is suitable for measuring the error margin at various noise levels in a servo channel.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a novel method and apparatus for measuring the error margin at various noise levels in a servo channel.

In at least one embodiment of the present invention, servo channel noise limits are defined through Viterbi decisions based on servo gate signals. Y values are used to produce a first Viterbi decision at each servo gate. Viterbi decisions and Y values are used to produce ideal Y values. Y values and ideal Y values are used to produce an error value which is adjusted by a noise factor based on estimated channel characteristics. The noise value is combined with Y values and used to produce a second Viterbi decision at each servo gate. Servo marginalization measures the error margin for servo systems under various channel conditions.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and together with the general description, serve to explain the principles.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The numerous advantages of the present invention may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a system for testing servo channel noise limits;

FIG. 2 shows a method for testing servo channel noise limits;

FIG. 3 shows a computer apparatus useful implementing embodiments of the present invention;

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the subject matter disclosed, which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims; numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents are encompassed. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the embodiments has not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description.

Referring to FIG. 1 , a block diagram of a system for testing servo channel noise limits is shown. In at least one embodiment of the present invention, a servo digital finite impulse response filter 102 receives one or more analog-to-digital converter samples 100 . A filtered signal is sent from the servo digital finite impulse response filter 102 to an interpolator 104 . The interpolator 104 estimates values based on the filtered signal. The filtered, interpolated signal is send to a MUX 118 . In at least one embodiment, the filtered, interpolated signal is also sent to a Y value buffer 106 . In at least one embodiment, the filtered, interpolated signal is also sent to a Y value ideal adapter 108 . An additive element 110 combines Y values from the Y value buffer 106 and the Y value ideal adapter 108 to produce an error value. The error value is adjusted be a noise multiplier 112 . A noise control signal 114 determines a noise value produced by the noise multiplier 112 . The noise value is combined by an additive element 116 with one or more Y values from the Y value buffer 106 to produce noisy Y values. The noisy Y values are sent to the MUX 118 . The MUX 118 receives a mode control signal 120 to determine whether the MUX 118 sends the noisy Y values or the filtered, interpolated signal to a servo Viterbi element 122 that produces a Viterbi decision. In at least one embodiment, the Viterbi decision is sent to the Y value ideal adapter 108 .

When the mode control signal 120 indicates that a marginalization mode is turned off, every servo gate produces a filtered, interpolated signal that is selected by the MUX 118 and sent to the servo Viterbi element 122 to produce a Viterbi decision. When the mode control signal 120 indicates that the marginalization mode is turned on, every servo gate produces a filtered, interpolated signal and one or more noisy Y values. The filtered, interpolated signal is selected by the MUX 118 and sent to the servo Viterbi element 122 to produce a first Viterbi decision. The first Viterbi decision is sent to the Y value ideal adapter 108 which uses the first Viterbi decision to produce ideal Y values. After some delay, the one or more noisy Y values are selected by the MUX 118 and sent to the servo Viterbi element 122 to produce a second, marginalized Viterbi decision. The second, marginalized Viterbi decision is also sent to the Y value ideal adapter 108 to produce ideal Y values. In at least one embodiment, the second, marginalized Viterbi decision is used for error marginalization and margin measurements under various channel conditions.

Referring to FIG. 2 , a method for testing servo channel noise limits is shown. In at least one embodiment of the present invention, a servo gate produces 200 one or more Y values. In at least one embodiment, the Y values are produced through a digital finite impulse response filter and an interpolator. A Viterbi decision is produced 212 based on the Y values. In one embodiment, the Viterbi decision is used in subsequent iterations to produce 202 ideal Y values.

Ideal Y values are produced 202 from the Y values and from Viterbi decisions produced during previous iterations. The Y values and ideal Y values are combined 204 to produce an error value. In at least one embodiment, combining 204 the Y values and ideal Y values refers to finding a differential by subtracting the ideal Y values from the Y values.

In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the error value is adjusted 206 according to a noise control signal to produce a noise value. The noise value is combined 208 with one or more Y values. The noise adjusted Y values are then used to produce 210 a Viterbi decision. In one embodiment, the Viterbi decision is used in subsequent iterations to produce 202 ideal Y values.

Referring to FIG. 3 , a computer apparatus useful implementing embodiments of the present invention is shown. In at least one embodiment, the apparatus includes a processor 300 , memory 302 used in storing and executing program code and a data store 304 with servos. The processor 300 receives analog-to-digital conversion samples based on servos in the data store 304 . Based on those samples, the processor 300 produces one or more Y values. In one embodiment, Y values are stored in a Y value buffer in the memory 302 . The processor 300 then produces a Viterbi decision based on the Y values. In one embodiment, the Viterbi decision is used in subsequent iterations to produce ideal Y values.

In at least one embodiment, the processor 300 also produces ideal Y values from the Y values and from Viterbi decisions produced during previous iterations. The processor 300 combines Y values and ideal Y values to produce an error value. In at least one embodiment, combining the Y values and ideal Y values refers to finding a differential by subtracting the ideal Y values from the Y values.

In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the processor 300 adjusts the error value according to a noise control signal to produce a noise value. The processor 300 combines the noise value with one or more Y values. The noise adjusted Y values are then used by the processor 300 to produce a Viterbi decision. In one embodiment, the Viterbi decision is used in subsequent iterations to produce ideal Y values.

It is believed that the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction, and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely an explanatory embodiment thereof, it is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.

Claims as granted

20 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G11B20/10
  • G11B5/09
  • G11B20/12
USPC · US Patent Classification
1/1.

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2013Jul 2013Oct 2013Jan 2014Apr 2014Jul 2014Oct 2014Jan 2015Apr 2015Jul 2015USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.2 y
816 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
1
1 RCE
Examiner
Dismery Mercedes
art unit 2688 · TC 2600
Citations: 18 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 2Owner 4Owner 5liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock