USPatent applicationPatented

Use of a Chinese medicine composition in preparing medicaments for treating secondary prevention of myocardial infarction

Granted 15 Dec 2015 · 1 office action

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20122014201620182020202220242026202820302032ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The present invention relates to a use of Chinese medicine composition in preparation of medicine for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Said Chinese medicine composition is prepared from a formula comprising the crude drugs by the following weight percentages: Radix Astragali 22.2%˜66.8%, Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae 11.6%˜33.4%, Radix Notoginseng 2.5%˜13.5%, and Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae 14.5%˜44.3%.

Description

19 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. national stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2011/076499, filed Jun. 28, 2011, which claims priority of Chinese Patent Application No. 201010219730.2, filed on Jun. 28, 2010, the contents of which are each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of medicine, in particular to a use of Chinese medicine composition in preparing medicaments for treating secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Cardiovascular disease is a common and frequent disease, threatening human life and health seriously. Annually, there are about 20 million persons dying of acute cardiovascular events worldwide, and more than half of them died of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). With population aging in China, the incidence of AMI showed a clear upward trend, which has been already close to the international average level. In recent years, raised monitoring and treating level has lowered the mortality of myocardial infarction. But the survivals are still at a high risk of reoccurrence of acute cardiovascular events, e.g. the myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and sudden death etc. Accordingly, except active treatment in acute phase, the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction should be strengthened.

The secondary prevention of myocardial infarction refers to the prevention of cardiovascular events and improvement patients' life quality after occurrence of myocardial infarction. As shown by many studies, there are a lot of drugs reported to have an active and positive effect on long-term secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, e.g. platelet inhibitors (aspirine), β-receptor blockers, statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) etc. In addition, efficacy of these drugs are not influenced by patients' other conditions, such as age and gender etc.

As confirmed by a large-scale medicine clinical trial results, although afore-mentioned drugs, e.g. platelet inhibitors (aspirine), β-receptor blockers, statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) etc can significantly decrease the mortality rate caused by AMI, a great many survivals are usually led to disability or death due to the cardiovascular events, such as re-infarction, severe arrhythmia and heart failure etc. Moreover, these drugs more or less have some adverse reactions, some of which are even very serious. In addition to this, some westerners became gradually aware of that the effect of single drug on secondary prevention may not be as good as that of combined drugs, and developed a series of compound western medicine preparations for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. In fact, herbal prescriptions have been mainly used for treating disease in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for thousands of years. Even a single herb medicine can be considered as a small compound prescription, because it contains complicated ingredients. Besides, the TCM prescriptions have the advantages of eased efficacy, attenuated toxicity and increased effect by drug compatibility and reduced side effect, which is accordingly suitable for long-term administration as secondary prevention medicine.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Objective of present invention is to provide a use of Chinese medicine composition in preparing medicaments for treating secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Said Chinese medicine composition is prepared from a formula comprising the crude drugs by the following weight percentages:

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition has effects of decreasing the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Said cardiovascular events include following diseases: a). re-infarction; b). severe arrhythmia; c). heart failure; d). Cardiogenic shock; e). revascularization (interventional therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting).

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition has effects of decreasing the occurrence of non-cardiovascular events in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Said non-cardiovascular events include following diseases: a). stroke; b) pulmonary embolism; c). peripheral vascular events; d). tumor.

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition has effects of decreasing the occurrence of death events in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Said death events include following ones: a). coronary heart disease (CHD) death; b). other cardiovascular death; c). non-cardiovascular disease death.

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition can alleviate the attack of angina pectoris in patients after acute cardiovascular infarction, e.g. reducing the frequency of attack, shortening the duration, relieving pain degree, decreasing the dose of nitroglycerin and improving the symptoms of chest pain, chest tightness, short breath, fatigue, palpitation, spontaneous perspiration as well as pale complexion.

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition can improve life quality in patients after acute myocardial infarction. After use of said Chinese medicine composition, the limitation degree of physical activity, steady status of angina pectoris and attack frequency of angina pectoris are significantly ameliorated.

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition is preferably prepared from a formula comprising the crude drugs by weight percentages:

According to the present invention, said Chinese medicine composition can be prepared by extracting the individual crude drug in accordance with conventional extraction methods or the ones known in the prior art and mixing. Preferably, said Chinese medicine composition is prepared by a method comprising: extracting pulverized Sanqi and Danshen with water, filtering, properly concentrating the filtrate, performing alcohol precipitation, recovering the obtained supernatant and concentrating continuously to give an extract, namely Danshen & Sanqi extract; extracting pulverized Huangqi with water, filtering, properly concentrating the filtrate, performing alcohol precipitation, recovering the obtained supernatant and concentrating continuously to give an extract, namely Huangqi extract; reflux extracting Jiangxiang with water and collecting volatile oil; mixing well aforesaid two extracts, volatile oil and excipients to prepare into any one of pharmaceutically acceptable dosage forms, preferably dripping pill. Furthermore, the dripping pill is prepared by following steps: providing aforesaid Danshen & Sanqi extract, Huangqi extract and PEG-6000 with 2˜5 times the total weight of extracts, dissolving on water bath to mix well, adding the Jiangxiang volatile oil and harmonizing to prepare the dripping pills by a conventional method. Likewise, the tablet can be obtained by a conventional method.

In order to better understand the present invention, a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy and positive drug controlled trial had been conducted. 3508 patients who were in accordance with the diagnostic standards of AMI for 28 days to 2 years and differentiated as Qi deficiency and blood stagnation syndrome by TCM were studied. 0.5 g Chinese medicine composition prepared by the method of EXAMPLE 1 (Coded as QSYQ) was administrated half an hour after meal, 3 times per day. Aspirine was used as a positive drug. The patients were treated for 1 year and observed for 6 months. As shown in the results, there was no statistical difference in non-fatal re-infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular deaths in patients after acute myocardial infarction between the Qi Shen Yi Qi dripping pill (prepared in accordance with the present invention) and aspirine (log-rank test used for inter-group comparison). Moreover, as compared with the aspirine, no statistical difference had been found in decreasing the incidence of end point of death, reducing the severity score, frequency and duration of angina pectoris, lowering nitroglycerin dose, improving a series of TCM symptoms, e.g. chest tightness, palpitation, spontaneous perspiration, pale complexion as well life quality (Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) used). It is illustrated that the Chinese medicine composition of present invention has a similar effect with the aspirine on secondary prevention in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

›ILLUSTRATION OF THE ABBREVIATION AND STATISTICS IN PRESENT INVENTION · 1 of 3

AE Adverse Event

FAS Full Analysis Set

SS Safety Set

PP Per-Protocol, PP

LOCF Last Observation Carried Forward

PP Per Protocol

Mean Mean number

SD Standard Deviation

Median Median value

Min Minimum value

Max Maximum value

CI Confidence Interval

HR Hazard Ratio

Aim of Study

First of all, the aim of this trial was to investigate whether there was an effect on decreasing the hazard ratio (HR) of non-fatal re-infarction, cardiovascular deaths and non-fatal stroke after long-term administration of QSYQ, and whether there was non-inferiority, as compared with the aspirine. The second was to understand the effect of QSYQ on other clinical events and the life quality in patients.

General Design

A multi-center, double blind, double dummy, randomized and positive drug controlled clinical study was carried out.

A large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCT) method was used. The trial was carried out simultaneously in 16 sub-centers (grade class III hospitals) of clinical trial in 5 regions of East, West, South, North and central China and 84 hospitals.

Randomized Method: Centralized Randomization

According to the ready-made Random Sequence Table (that was generated by the computer), the subjects were randomly assigned into any one of two treating groups in a ratio of 1:1 via an Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS).

When the subjects met inclusion/exclusion criteria, researchers called the IVRS, and the IVRS would assign a subject with a specific identification code and random number. The specific identification code and random number assigned by IVRS were unique. They were used to represent the subjects' identification and which drug the subjects received.

In order to achieve the purpose of double blind in this trial, a placebo of QSYQ had been developed. It was required that it should have the same packaging and essentially consistent appearance, shape and color with the QSYQ. Likewise, the placebo of aspirine tablet had the same packaging and essentially consistent appearance, shape and color with the aspirine. For each subject, one-month dosage was packaged into a small box, containing QSYQ and the placebo of aspirine or aspirine and the placebo of QSYQ. Three-month dosage was packaged into a large box and each medicine had a same number.

The unique numbers were pre-printed on the study medicine labels. Through the IVRS, the medicines were randomly assigned to the subjects who met the requirements. Said labels were divided into two parts: the part that was pasted on the box was to describe how to use the medicine and other information; the removable part was torn off and pasted on the Drug Distribution Table. In addition, the drug assigners should record the medicine number of each observation on the Drug Distribution Diary.

Positive Control Drug

The aspirine (AS) was used as a routine drug for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

Administration Method

1. QSYQ treating group: QSYQ 0.5 g, tid, administrated half an hour post meal, taken 100 mg placebo of enteric coated aspirine tablet (4 tablets) at the same time, once a day.

2. Aspirine control group: 100 mg enteric coated aspirine tablet (4 tablets), administrated half an hour post meal, once a day, taken 0.5 g placebo of QSYQ at the same time, tid.

Calculation of Sample Size

Sample size was calculated on the following assumptions. According to the previous clinical experience, the incidence of MI (myocardial infarction) within 1 year was about 5%. Assuming that the treatment could reduce the death risk to 50% (namely the HR was 0.5), the dropping rate 20%, at least total number of 3000 study subjects were required (trial group: 1800 cases, power=90%, bilateral alpha=0.05). The research time was 18 months, the first 12 months of which was the treatment period and later 6 months the follow-up period.

Evaluation Index

I.1 Definition of Index

I.1.1 Endpoint Events

(1) Cardiovascular events include a. Re-infarction, b. Severe arrhythmia, c. Heart failure, d. Cardiogenic shock, e. Revascularization (Interventional Therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting).

(2) Non-cardiovascular events include a. Stroke, b Pulmonary Embolism, c. Peripheral Vascular events, d. tumor.

(3) Death events include a. Coronary heart disease death, b. other cardiovascular death, c. non-cardiovascular death.

I.1.2 Score of Angina Pectoris and TCM Symptom

Standard of symptom score Angina pectoris Frequency 0 score: None; 2 score: 2~6 times a week; 4 score: 1~3 times a day; 6 score: 4 times or more a day. Duration 0 score: None; 2 score: duration of pain for each time ≦5 min; 4 score: 5-10 min; 6 score: ≧10 min. Pain degree 0 score: none; 2 score: attack was ameliorated after rest, and daily life not affected; 4 score: attack was treated with drug, and normal activity continued after remission; 6 score: daily activity was affected by frequent attacks (onset of symptoms could be induced by e.g. dressing, eating, walking, stool). Dose of 0 score: none; 2 score: 1~4 tablets a week; 4 score: 5~9 tablets a week; 6 score: 10 nitroglycerin tablets or more a week. TCM symptoms Chest pain 0score: none; 3 score: attack was ameliorated after rest, and daily life not affected; 6 score: attack was treated with drug, and normal activity continued after remission; 9 score: daily activity was affected by frequent attacks (onset of symptoms could be induced by e.g. dressing, eating, walking, stool). Chest 0 score: none; 3 score: chest tightness was felt occasionally, which could be self tightness relieved; 6 score: chest tightness attacked frequently, but didn't affect the nomal life and work; 9 score: chest tightness could not be relieved, and affected the normal life and work. Short breath 0 score: none; 2 score: short breath after activity; 4 score: short breath after slight activity; 6 score: short breath felt usually. Fatigue 0 score: none; 2 score: fatigue was felt after severe activity; 4 score: fatigue was felt after middle activity; 6 score: fatigue was felt after slight activity. Palpitation 0 score: none; 1 score: sporadic palpitation could be self relieved; 2 score: palpitation frequently attacked, but could continue working; 3 score: sustained palpitation could not be relieved, and affected the life and work. spontaneous 0 score: none; 1 score: occasional perspiration after activity; 2 score: apparent perspiration perspiration after activity; 3 score: often perspiration when taking rest. pale 0 score: none; 1 score: pale complexion. complexion

›ILLUSTRATION OF THE ABBREVIATION AND STATISTICS IN PRESENT INVENTION · 2 of 3

I.1.3 Life Quality

There were 19 questions in the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ), including 5 parts: physical limitation (PL), anginal stability (AS), anginal frequency (AF), treatment satisfaction (TS) and disease perception (DP). After being given necessary explanation by doctors, the questions were answered independently by patients.

I.2 Treatment Standard

Treatment standard was divided into 4 grades. The first grade standard belonged to the primary endpoint event, and the second, third and fourth grades to the secondary endpoint event.

The 1 st grade included the non-fatal re-infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular deaths.

The 2 nd grade included the severe arrhythmia, heart failure, cardiogenic shock and revascularization.

The 3 rd grade included the peripheral vascular events, pulmonary embolism and non-cardiovascular deaths.

The 4 th grade included the angina pectoris, TCM symptoms and SAQ.

The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of endpoint events within 1 year from the first administration of medicine. The dropout subjects (e.g. revoked informed consent or out of follow-up) were removed in the last assessment. The endpoint of the study was 1 year after the last subject was randomly assigned into group (12 months).

I.2.1 Main Indexes for Therapeutic Effects

Incidence of Main Endpoint Events

The main endpoint events were defined as the first grade endpoint events, including non-fatal re-infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death. As long as any one of the events occurred, it was regarded as occurrence of the main endpoint event. Other cases could be deleted.

The main endpoint events time was calculated in accordance with the following method. If the endpoint events occurred, the time was defined as the duration from the first administration of drug to the time when any one of aforesaid events occurred (e.g. if there were plural endpoint events in a same disease, the most recent time when event occurred was deemed as the main endpoint events time.). If the subjects dropped out of the trial or lost follow-up for any reason before the end of study, the time was calculated on the basis of withdrawal or out of follow-up time. If the subjects survived to the last observation, the time was calculated on the basis of the last observation time.

I.2.2 Secondary Indexes for Therapeutic Effects

The secondary indexes included the overall survival time, angina pectoris score, TCM symptom score and SAQ.

Overall Survival Time

Death endpoint referred to the death caused by any reason during the period of study. Other cases were defined as censorship.

Death endpoint time was calculated in accordance with following method. The time referred to the duration from the first administration of drug to the time when the endpoint events occurred, and non-endpoint time was defined with reference to method of the main endpoint event.

I.3 Safety Indexes Mainly Include:

Adverse event referred to any adverse medical events that happened from the time when patients signed the Informed consent form (ICF) and were enrolled in trial to the end of treatment, whether having a relationship with the test drug or not.

Severe adverse event included death and other cases threatening life, events leading to hospitalization treatment, prolonged hospitalization treatment, permanently or severely causing disability or malformation.

Statistical Population

1. Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population

Ideal cases set was established as possible as in accordance with the intentional treatment principle, which was obtained from the randomized subjects, to the exclusion of the least or unreasonable cases.

Missing Data Processing

(1). Endpoint events were processed in accordance with the survival data analysis. See the main indexes for therapeutic effects in section of statistical analysis.

(2). Other treatment indexes included angina pectoris score, TCM symptom score and various evaluation results that were recorded in the SAQ. The missing value for aforesaid indexes was estimated on the basis of the closest last observation carried forward (LOCF) estimation method.

2. Per-Protocol (PP) Population

Also, the PP population was called as valid cases, valid samples or evaluable cases. Full compliance with the trial program made it ensure that the data set was generated by the valid case subset shown by scientific model.

3. Safety Set (SS) Population

The SS population of this trial consisted of the subjects who received at least one treatment after randomization.

Division of the statistical analysis population was determined jointly by clinical researchers, data managers and statistical analysis experts on blind review meeting.

Statistical Analysis Method

I.4 General Principle

Two-sided test was used in all statistical tests. It was believed to have statistical significance (p≦0.05, unless otherwise indicated).

Quantitative indexes were expressed as mean value, standard deviation, median value, minimum value and maximum value.

Classification indexes were expressed as number of samples and its percentage.

I.5 Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect

1.5.1 Baseline

The baseline was defined as observation #1 of patients who entered the group before administration. The baseline evaluation was carried out in FAS population.

Either t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test could be used for inter-group baseline comparison by total and single scores of angina pectoris, total and single scores of TCM symptom and the score of each question recorded in the SAQ.

I.5.2 Evaluation of Main Therapeutic Effects

Main therapeutic effects referred to the survival rate of main endpoint events.

Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate of main endpoint events in both trial and control group. The survival curve was established after calculating onset time at 25%, 50% and 75% quantile. Log-rank test was used for inter-group comparison.

Cox proportional hazard model was used to test the risk of endpoint events occurring in trial group in comparison with the control group to calculate its 95% confidence interval.

›ILLUSTRATION OF THE ABBREVIATION AND STATISTICS IN PRESENT INVENTION · 3 of 3

About the definition and calculation method of main endpoint events, see the relevant section of indexes of therapeutic effects.

I.5.3 Evaluation of Secondary Therapeutic Effects

They included the overall survival time, angina pectoris score, TCM symptom score and life quality score, where angina pectoris score, TCM symptom score and life quality score were evaluated at randomization, in 1 st , 3 rd , 6 th , 9 th , 12 th month after treatment and 18 th month after follow-up.

I.5.3.1 Overall Survival Time

Analysis method referred to the survival rate of main endpoint events. About the definition and calculation method of overall survival time, see the relevant section of indexes of therapeutic effects.

I.5.3.2 Angina Pectoris Score

Total angina pectoris score was described on every observation period and the change of observation in comparison with baseline. T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for inter-group comparison. Grade of total score was evaluated on every observation and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for inter-group comparison. T-test and Pairing signed rank sum test were used for analyzing the change of total score on every observation between groups in comparison with the baseline.

Single angina pectoris score was depicted on every observation time-point and the change of observation in comparison with baseline. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for inter-group comparison. Pairing signed rank sum test was used for analyzing the change of total score on every observation between groups in comparison with the baseline.

I.5.3.3 TCM Symptom Score

The analysis method referred to the angina pectoris score.

I.5.3.4 SAQ

All evaluation results of SAQ were described during the period of observation, and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for inter-group comparison.

I.6 Evaluation of Safety

I.6.1 Patients' Exposure Time in Study

Observation time (day)=(ending date-starting date)+1

Medication time (day)=(last date-initial date)+1

I.6.2 Indexes for Evaluation of Safety

Adverse events were evaluated at any time after enrollment. Safety population was used for the indexes for evaluation of safety.

I.6.3 Safety Evaluation Method

Occurrence, proportion and number of the adverse events were described group by group in each treatment group. The patients who were aborted from trial by adverse events, and the ones of related adverse events and severe adverse events were described in list.

Results of Statistical Analysis

In this study, the data were for blind review and then locked.

After opening the blind on the spot, the results were divided into two groups of #A and #B for the first time and the main indexes for therapeutic effect was evaluated. After opening blind for the second time, #A group was trial group and #B group control group.

Total 3508 patients were enrolled in this study, 1748 patients in trial group and 1760 patients in control group respectively. There were 3505 patients entering the FAS population, respectively 1746 patients in trial group and 1759 patients in control group. There were 2956 patients entering the PP population, respectively 1456 patients in trial group and 1500 patients in control group. There were 3507 patients entering the SS population, respectively 1747 patients in trial group and 1760 patients in control group.

Indexes for Therapeutic Effect

Baseline:

Except there was statistically significant difference in fatigue indexes of TCM symptom between the groups (P<0.05), no statistically significant difference was found in other indexes (P>0.05).

Main Indexes for Therapeutic Effect:

Occurrence of Main Endpoint Events

I.6.4.2 Angina Pectoris Score

Total angina pectoris score was described on every observation period and the change of observation in comparison with the baseline. T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for inter-group comparison. Grade of total score was evaluated on every observation and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for inter-group comparison. T-test and Pairing signed rank sum test were used for analyzing the change of total score on every observation between groups in comparison with the baseline.

Single angina pectoris score was described on every observation time-point and the change of observation in comparison with baseline. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for inter-group comparison. Pairing signed rank sum test was used for analyzing the change of total score on every observation between groups in comparison with the baseline.

I.6.4.4 Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

The evaluation results in the SAQ were depicted in different observations, and inter-group comparison was tested by Wilcoxon Rank-sum test.

I.7 Safety Evaluation

No severe adverse events were observed.

›ILLUSTRATION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of main endpoint event time (FAS).

FIG. 2 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of main endpoint event time (FAS).

FIG. 3 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of main endpoint event time (PP).

FIG. 4 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of main endpoint event time (PP).

FIG. 5 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of death endpoint event time (FAS).

FIG. 6 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of death endpoint event time (FAS).

FIG. 7 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of death endpoint event time (PP).

FIG. 8 was the Kaplan-Meier curve of death endpoint event time (PP).

›EMBODIMENTS

The medicaments of the present invention will be further described with reference to the following examples, which are solely used to illustrate the present invention without limitation.

›Examples10
›Example 1

Extraction of Radix Salvia Miltiorrhizae and Radix Notoginseng:

Coarsely-ground Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae and Radix Notoginseng were placed into an extraction tank, into which water with 7 times the weight of the Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae and Radix Notoginseng crude drugs was poured to decoct for 2 times, 2 hours each time. After combination of the decoction, the solution was filtered and concentrated to obtain an extract in a volume of 900 ml. Then, 95% (v/v) ethanol was slowly added into the obtained extract solution to make a final ethanol content of 70% (v/v), and allowed to stand still for 12˜24 hours to separate the supernatant, and the supernatant was filtered. The filtrate was concentrated by removing the ethanol to obtain an extract with a relative density of 1.32˜1.38 (50˜60° C.).

Extraction of Radix Astragali

Ground Radix Astragali was placed into an extraction tank, into which water with 6 times the weight of the Radix Astragali crude drugs was poured to decoct for 2 times, 2 hours for the first time and 1 hour for the second time. After combination of the decoction, the solution was filtered and concentrated to obtain an extract in a volume of 1500 ml. Then, 95% (v/v) ethanol was slowly added into the obtained extract solution to make a final ethanol content of 60% (v/v), and allowed to stand still for 12˜24 hours to separate the supernatant, and the supernatant was concentrated by removing the ethanol to an extract in a volume of about 400 ml. Repeatedly, 95% (v/v) ethanol was slowly added into the obtained extract solution to make a final ethanol content of 80% (v/v), and allowed to stand still for 12˜24 hours to separate the supernatant, and the supernatant was concentrated by removing the ethanol to an extract with a relative density of 1.32˜1.38 (50˜60° C.).

Extraction of Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae

The Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae was reflux extracted for 5 hours by addition of water with 5 times the weight of the Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae crude drugs to collect the volatile oil.

Afore-mentioned Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae and Radix Notoginseng extract, Radix Astragali extract and PEG-6000 were mixed and melted on water bath. Until being well-melted, the volatile oil of Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae was added. After homogenized mixing, the mixture was transferred to a dripping machine to give 1000 dripping pills.

›Example 2

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 3

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 4

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 5

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 6

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 7

1000 dripping pills were prepared by the same method as that in EXAMPLE 1, except the formulation:

›Example 8

Extraction method of afore-mentioned crude drug was the same as that in EXAMPLE 1, and the extract, sucrose and dextrin were provided in a ratio of 1:3:1 by weight and prepared into capsule by a conventional method.

›Example 9

Extraction method of afore-mentioned crude drug was the same as that in EXAMPLE 1, and the extract, sucrose and dextrin were provided in a ratio of 1:3:1 by weight and prepared into 200 tablets by a conventional method.

›Example 10

Extraction method of afore-mentioned crude drug was the same as that in EXAMPLE 1, and the extract, sucrose and dextrin were provided in a ratio of 1:3:1 by weight and prepared into 125 bags of granules by a conventional method.

›Tables in the description — 83
Radix Astragali (Huangqi in TCM)22.2%-66.8%,
Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae (Danshen)11.6%-33.4%,
Radix Notoginseng (Sanqi)2.5%-13.5%, and
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae (Jiangxiang)14.5%-44.3%.
Radix Astragali (Huangqi)30.8%-57.2%
Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae (Danshen)15.4%-28.6%
Radix Notoginseng (Sanqi)3.5%-6.5%, and
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae (Jiangxiang)20.6%-38.2%.
Most preferably,
Radix Astragali (Huangqi)44.7%,
Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae (Danshen)26.7%,
Radix Notoginseng (Sanqi)6.3%, and
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae (Jiangxiang)22.3%.
Or,
Radix Astragali (Huangqi)41.2%,
Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae (Danshen)23.8%,
Radix Notoginseng (Sanqi)4.5%, and
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae (Jiangxiang)30.5%.
TABLE 1 — test of incidence of main endpoint events in two groups at different times (FAS)
Test methodstatisticP value
TimeLog-Rank test0.000.9523
TABLE 2 — Cox model of survival time (risk rate and 95% CI) (FAS)-random method Total (trial group = 1746, As for Kaplan-Meier time curve of main endpoint event (FAS), see FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.
Itemscontrol group = 1759, N = 3505)
Survival time (Cox model)
Trial group v. control group1.01(0.72, 1.42)
Likelihood ratio (P)0.00(0.952)
TABLE 3 — test of incidence of main endpoint events in two groups at different times (PP)
Test methodStatisticP value
TimeLog-Rank test0.000.9788
TABLE 4 — Cox model of survival time (risk rate and 95% CI)-random method Total (trial group = 1456 As for Kaplan-Meier time curve of main endpoint event (FAS), see FIG. 3 and FIG. 4.
Itemscontrol group = 1500 N = 2956)
Survival time (Cox model)
Trial group v. control group(1.00 (0.71, 1.42)
Likelihood ratio (P)0.00 (0.979)
TABLE 5 — test of incidence of death endpoint events in two groups at different times (PP)
Test methodstatisticP value
TimeLog-Rank test1.270.2592
TABLE 6 — Cox model of survival time (risk rate and 95% CI) (FAS)-random method Total (trial = 1746 As for Kaplan-Meier time curve of death endpoint event (FAS), see FIG. 5 and FIG. 6.
Itemscontrol = 1759 total = 3505)
Survival time (Cox model)
Trial group vs. control group1.29(0.83, 2.01)
Likelihood ratio (P)1.28(0.259)
TABLE 7 — test of incidence of death endpoint events in two groups at different times (PP)
Test methodstatisticP value
TimeLog-Rank test1.190.2752
TABLE 9 — change of total angina pectoris score in every observation
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1497(3)1447(9)
Mean (SD)7.12(5.31)7.21(5.20)7.20(5.31)7.43(5.25)
Min, Max0.00,24.000.00,24.000.00,24.000.00,24.00
Md (Q3-Q1)8.00(12.00)8.00(9.00)8.00(12.00)8.00(7.00)
1 month after treatment
N (Missing)1744(15)1725(21)1489(11)1447(9)
Mean (SD)5.92(5.23)5.96(5.11)5.95(5.21)6.06(5.17)
Min, Max0.00,22.000.00,24.000.00,22.000.00,24.00
Md (Q3-Q1)6.00(10.00)6.00(10.00)6.00(10.00)6.00(10.00)
1 month after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1488(12)1443(13)
Mean (SD)−1.19(3.66)−1.24(3.86)−1.22(3.64)−1.36(3.82)
Min, Max−20.00,16.00−22.00,16.00−20.00,16.00−22.00,16.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(2.00)0.00(2.00)0.00(2.00)0.00(2.00)
Pairing t test (P)−13.59(0.0000)−13.33(0.0000)−12.92(0.0000)−13.57(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
N (Missing)1744(15)1725(21)1473(27)1433(23)
Mean (SD)5.38(5.04)5.47(4.92)5.32(4.99)5.49(4.91)
Min, Max0.00,22.000.00,24.000.00,22.000.00,24.00
Md (Q3-Q1)6.00(9.00)6.00(8.00)6.00(9.00)6.00(9.00)
3 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1472(28)1429(27)
Mean (SD)−1.73(4.15)−1.75(4.26)−1.85(4.08)−1.92(4.15)
Min, Max−22.00,16.00−22.00,15.00−20.00,14.00−22.00,14.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(4.00)0.00(3.00)0.00(4.00)0.00(4.00)
Pairing t test (P)−17.43(0.0000)−17.04(0.0000)−17.38(0.0000)−17.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
N (Missing)1744(15)1725(21)1457(43)1413(43)
Mean (SD)4.78(4.84)4.96(4.79)4.54(4.68)4.85(4.66)
Min, Max0.00,24.000.00,22.000.00,24.000.00,22.00
Md (Q3-Q1)5.00(8.00)6.00(8.00)5.00(8.00)5.00(8.00)
6 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1456(44)1409(47)
Mean (SD)−2.34(4.40)−2.26(4.63)−2.58(4.34)−2.56(4.45)
Min, Max−24.00,14.00−22.00,18.00−24.00,14.00−22.00,18.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(5.00)0.00(5.00)−1.00(5.00)−1.00(5.00)
Pairing t test (P)−22.15(0.0000)−20.29(0.0000)−22.67(0.0000)−21.57(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
N (Missing)1744(15)1725(21)1443(57)1383(73)
Mean (SD)4.39(4.65)4.52(4.61)4.10(4.40)4.24(4.36)
Min, Max0.00,22.000.00,22.000.00,22.000.00,18.00
Md (Q3-Q1)5.00(8.00)5.00(8.00)5.00(8.00)5.00(8.00)
9 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1442(58)1379(77)
Mean (SD)−2.72(4.66)−2.70(4.92)−3.02(4.61)−3.16(4.69)
Min, Max−24.00,14.00−24.00,18.00−24.00,14.00−24.00,18.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−1.00(6.00)−1.00(6.00)−2.00(6.00)−2.00(6.00)
Pairing t test (P)−24.42(0.0000)−22.76(0.0000)−24.86(0.0000)−25.04(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
N (Missing)1744(15)1725(21)1432(68)1373(83)
Mean (SD)3.83(4.47)4.03(4.42)3.38(4.05)3.63(4.04)
Min, Max0.00,22.000.00,22.000.00,18.000.00,20.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(7.00)5.00(8.00)0.00(6.00)0.00(7.00)
12 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1743(16)1721(25)1431(69)1369(87)
Mean (SD)−3.28(4.82)−3.19(5.05)−3.71(4.72)−3.79(4.71)
Min, Max−24.00,16.00−24.00,18.00−24.00,16.00−24.00,11.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−2.00(6.00)−2.00(6.00)−3.00(6.00)−3.00(6.00)
Pairing t test (P)−28.43(0.0000)−26.17(0.0000)−29.75(0.0000)−29.75(0.0000)
Follow-up
N (Missing)1443(316)1385(361)1408(92)1349(107)
Mean (SD)3.59(4.24)3.67(4.11)3.60(4.23)3.68(4.10)
Min, Max0.00,18.000.00,18.000.00,18.000.00,18.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(7.00)0.00(7.00)0.00(7.00)0.00(7.00)
Follow-up-baseline
N (Missing)1443(316)1381(365)1408(92)1345(111)
Mean (SD)−3.49(4.97)−3.74(4.93)−3.51(4.98)−3.73(4.90)
Min, Max−24.00,14.00−24.00,10.00−24.00,14.00−24.00,10.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−2.00(6.00)−2.00(7.00)−2.00(6.00)−2.00(7.00)
Pairing t test (P)−26.63(0.0000)−28.17(0.0000)−26.42(0.0000)−27.95(0.0000)
TABLE 10 — distribution of total angina pectoris score in every observation
FASPP
ItemsControl grouptrial groupControl grouptrial group
Baseline
Mild1086(62.34%)1092(63.45%)917(61.26%)880(60.82%)
Medium608(34.90%)574(33.35%)539(36.01%)516(35.66%)
Severe48(2.76%)55(3.20%)41(2.74%)51(3.52%)
Total1742172114971447
1 month after treatment
Mild1203(70.19%)1210(71.09%)1030(69.31%)1013(70.06%)
Medium484(28.24%)464(27.26%)434(29.21%)407(28.15%)
Severe27(1.58%)28(1.65%)22(1.48%)26(1.80%)
Total1714170214861446
3 months after treatment
Mild1241(74.94%)1247(75.81%)1098(74.54%)1075(75.02%)
Medium397(23.97%)386(23.47%)363(24.64%)348(24.28%)
Severe18(1.09%)12(0.73%)12(0.81%)10(0.70%)
Total1656164514731433
6 months after treatment
Mild1273(80.06%)1252(79.90%)1172(80.44%)1125(79.62%)
Medium309(19.43%)305(19.46%)278(19.08%)280(19.82%)
Severe8(0.50%)10(0.64%)7(0.48%)8(0.57%)
Total1590156714571413
9 months after treatment
Mild1280(83.77%)1220(83.05%)1207(83.65%)1147(82.94%)
Medium244(15.97%)241(16.41%)233(16.15%)229(16.56%)
Severe4(0.26%)8(0.54%)3(0.21%)7(0.51%)
Total1528146914431383
12 months after treatment
Mild1294(87.91%)1217(86.31%)1259(87.92%)1184(86.23%)
Medium176(11.96%)189(13.40%)171(11.94%)185(13.47%)
Severe2(0.14%)4(0.28%)2(0.14%)4(0.29%)
Total1472141014321373
Follow-up
Mild1243(86.14%)1185(85.56%)1215(86.29%)1155(85.62%)
Medium199(13.79%)199(14.37%)192(13.64%)193(14.31%)
Severe1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Total1443138514081349
TABLE 11 — test of distribution of total angina pectoris score in every observation
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valuestatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.550.58130.400.6864
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.560.5775−0.370.7102
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.630.5289−0.310.7560
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.130.89340.560.5765
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test0.560.57430.540.5900
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test1.290.19681.340.1795
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.440.65800.510.6109
TABLE 12 — change of attack times in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0480(27.54%)444(25.80%)404(26.99%)358(24.74%)
1158(9.06%)166(9.65%)134(8.95%)133(9.19%)
2928(53.24%)958(55.67%)801(53.51%)819(56.60%)
4159(9.12%)133(7.73%)143(9.55%)119(8.22%)
618(1.03%)20(1.16%)15(1.00%)18(1.24%)
Total1743172114971447
month after treatment
0638(36.58%)606(35.13%)541(36.33%)501(34.62%)
1187(10.72%)205(11.88%)165(11.08%)170(11.75%)
2812(46.56%)835(48.41%)698(46.88%)704(48.65%)
4105(6.02%)71(4.12%)83(5.57%)65(4.49%)
62(0.11%)8(0.46%)2(0.13%)7(0.48%)
Total1744172514891447
1 month after treatment-baseline
−62(0.11%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
−50(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−418(1.03%)24(1.39%)16(1.08%)21(1.46%)
−36(0.34%)6(0.35%)6(0.40%)4(0.28%)
−2209(11.99%)185(10.75%)188(12.63%)157(10.88%)
−1124(7.11%)150(8.72%)105(7.06%)128(8.87%)
01304(74.81%)1277(74.20%)1109(74.53%)1076(74.57%)
136(2.07%)31(1.80%)29(1.95%)25(1.73%)
241(2.35%)43(2.50%)31(2.08%)28(1.94%)
32(0.11%)2(0.12%)2(0.13%)1(0.07%)
41(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Total1743172114881443
Signed-rank (P)−32430(0.0000)−33041(0.0000)−25398.5(0.0000)−24610.0(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0698(40.02%)658(38.14%)596(40.46%)544(37.96%)
1246(14.11%)247(14.32%)205(13.92%)199(13.89%)
2723(41.46%)755(43.77%)617(41.89%)636(44.38%)
475(4.30%)60(3.48%)53(3.60%)50(3.49%)
62(0.11%)5(0.29%)2(0.14%)4(0.28%)
Total1744172514731433
3 months after treatment-baseline
−64(0.23%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)2(0.14%)
−52(0.11%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)2(0.14%)
−425(1.43%)26(1.51%)23(1.56%)20(1.40%)
−38(0.46%)9(0.52%)8(0.54%)8(0.56%)
−2275(15.78%)245(14.24%)243(16.51%)210(14.70%)
−1191(10.96%)208(12.09%)165(11.21%)171(11.97%)
01142(65.52%)1143(66.41%)959(65.15%)959(67.11%)
154(3.10%)41(2.38%)41(2.79%)28(1.96%)
239(2.24%)41(2.38%)27(1.83%)26(1.82%)
30(0.00%)1(0.06%)
43(0.17%)3(0.17%)2(0.14%)3(0.21%)
Total1743172114721429
Signed-rank (P)−66367(0.0000)−60228(0.0000)−51462.5(0.0000)−42922.5(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0777(44.55%)726(42.09%)670(45.98%)596(42.18%)
1271(15.54%)314(18.20%)232(15.92%)267(18.90%)
2642(36.81%)643(37.28%)527(36.17%)523(37.01%)
453(3.04%)40(2.32%)27(1.85%)27(1.91%)
61(0.06%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Total1744172514571413
6 months after treatment-baseline
−66(0.34%)4(0.23%)4(0.27%)3(0.21%)
−50(0.00%)3(0.17%)0(0.00%)3(0.21%)
−431(1.78%)33(1.92%)28(1.92%)26(1.85%)
−316(0.92%)13(0.76%)16(1.10%)11(0.78%)
−2326(18.70%)293(17.02%)290(19.92%)250(17.74%)
−1265(15.20%)301(17.49%)234(16.07%)261(18.52%)
01010(57.95%)992(57.64%)827(56.80%)803(56.99%)
143(2.47%)39(2.27%)28(1.92%)27(1.92%)
243(2.47%)40(2.32%)27(1.85%)25(1.77%)
31(0.06%)1(0.06%)
42(0.11%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
Total1743172114561409
Signed-rank (P)−105E3(0.0000)−104E3(0.0000)−82797.5(0.0000)−77409.0(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0825(47.31%)777(45.04%)708(49.06%)641(46.35%)
1354(20.30%)392(22.72%)312(21.62%)345(24.95%)
2527(30.22%)529(30.67%)409(28.34%)384(27.77%)
436(2.06%)25(1.45%)12(0.83%)13(0.94%)
62(0.11%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
Total1744172514431383
9 months after treatment-baseline
−67(0.40%)7(0.41%)5(0.35%)5(0.36%)
−50(0.00%)2(0.12%)0(0.00%)2(0.15%)
−443(2.47%)40(2.32%)39(2.70%)33(2.39%)
−315(0.86%)15(0.87%)15(1.04%)13(0.94%)
−2359(20.60%)331(19.23%)321(22.26%)281(20.38%)
−1352(20.20%)390(22.66%)316(21.91%)348(25.24%)
0877(50.32%)853(49.56%)687(47.64%)650(47.14%)
152(2.98%)38(2.21%)35(2.43%)26(1.89%)
235(2.01%)42(2.44%)22(1.53%)21(1.52%)
31(0.06%)1(0.06%)
41(0.06%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
61(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Total1743172114421379
Signed-rank (P)−154E3(0.0000)−152E3(0.0000)−123547(0.0000)−117132(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0909(52.12%)850(49.28%)788(55.03%)706(51.42%)
1384(22.02%)425(24.64%)342(23.88%)378(27.53%)
2417(23.91%)426(24.70%)294(20.53%)279(20.32%)
433(1.89%)22(1.28%)8(0.56%)10(0.73%)
61(0.06%)2(0.12%)
Total1744172514321373
12 months after treatment-baseline
−67(0.40%)8(0.46%)5(0.35%)6(0.44%)
−51(0.06%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)3(0.22%)
−455(3.16%)45(2.61%)51(3.56%)36(2.63%)
−315(0.86%)20(1.16%)15(1.05%)18(1.31%)
−2401(23.01%)364(21.15%)358(25.02%)312(22.79%)
−1399(22.89%)445(25.86%)364(25.44%)401(29.29%)
0795(45.61%)765(44.45%)599(41.86%)561(40.98%)
136(2.07%)30(1.74%)19(1.33%)17(1.24%)
230(1.72%)38(2.21%)17(1.19%)15(1.10%)
31(0.06%)1(0.06%)
43(0.17%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
Total1743172114311369
Signed-rank (P)−194E3(0.0000)−193E3(0.0000)−158309(0.0000)−151127(0.0000)
Follow-up
0774(53.64%)716(51.70%)753(53.48%)693(51.37%)
1329(22.80%)385(27.80%)322(22.87%)378(28.02%)
2331(22.94%)281(20.29%)324(23.01%)275(20.39%)
49(0.62%)3(0.22%)9(0.64%)3(0.22%)
Total1443138514081349
Follow-up baseline
−66(0.42%)4(0.29%)6(0.43%)4(0.30%)
−53(0.21%)5(0.36%)3(0.21%)5(0.37%)
−452(3.60%)44(3.19%)52(3.69%)42(3.12%)
−329(2.01%)30(2.17%)29(2.06%)29(2.16%)
−2328(22.73%)312(22.59%)322(22.87%)304(22.60%)
−1325(22.52%)372(26.94%)316(22.44%)365(27.14%)
0645(44.70%)572(41.42%)626(44.46%)557(41.41%)
128(1.94%)25(1.81%)28(1.99%)23(1.71%)
225(1.73%)17(1.23%)24(1.70%)16(1.19%)
42(0.14%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
Total1443138114081345
Signed-rank (P)−14E4(0.0000)−149E3(0.0000)−134334(0.0000)−142184(0.0000)
TABLE 13 — test of change of attack times in different observations
FASPP
Itemstest methodstatisticP valuestatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.330.74240.730.4660
1 month afterRank-sum test0.030.97490.540.5918
treatment
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.450.6511−0.340.7340
treatment-baseline
3 months afterRank-sum test0.910.36331.410.1592
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.220.82790.530.5932
treatment-baseline
6 months afterRank-sum test0.610.54001.390.1638
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.080.93450.390.6981
treatment-baseline
9 months afterRank-sum test0.680.49350.800.4246
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.200.8389−0.090.9306
treatment-baseline
12 months afterRank-sum test1.150.24981.450.1478
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test0.140.89260.250.7996
treatment-baseline
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.000.99600.060.9541
Follow-up-Rank-sum test−1.390.1632−1.280.2008
baseline
TABLE 14 — change of duration period in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl grouptrial groupcontrol grouptrial group
Baseline
0480(27.54%)446(25.92%)404(26.99%)359(24.81%)
2798(45.78%)834(48.46%)687(45.89%)681(47.06%)
4382(21.92%)371(21.56%)343(22.91%)343(23.70%)
683(4.76%)70(4.07%)63(4.21%)64(4.42%)
Total1743172114971447
1 month after treatment
0638(36.58%)605(35.07%)541(36.33%)500(34.55%)
2735(42.14%)779(45.16%)624(41.91%)639(44.16%)
4339(19.44%)312(18.09%)297(19.95%)283(19.56%)
632(1.83%)29(1.68%)27(1.81%)25(1.73%)
Total1744172514891447
1 month after treatment-baseline
−619(1.09%)28(1.63%)13(0.87%)27(1.87%)
−439(2.24%)44(2.56%)34(2.28%)42(2.91%)
−2269(15.43%)230(13.36%)227(15.26%)186(12.89%)
01329(76.25%)1332(77.40%)1141(76.68%)1124(77.89%)
275(4.30%)72(4.18%)64(4.30%)55(3.81%)
410(0.57%)13(0.76%)8(0.54%)8(0.55%)
62(0.11%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114881443
Signed-rank (P)−25517(0.0000)−21968(0.0000)−18004.5(0.0000)−16427.5(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0697(39.97%)657(38.09%)595(40.39%)543(37.89%)
2729(41.80%)774(44.87%)606(41.14%)636(44.38%)
4297(17.03%)274(15.88%)257(17.45%)243(16.96%)
621(1.20%)20(1.16%)15(1.02%)11(0.77%)
Total1744172514731433
3 months after treatment-baseline
−626(1.49%)31(1.80%)18(1.22%)28(1.96%)
−453(3.04%)65(3.78%)43(2.92%)59(4.13%)
−2357(20.48%)303(17.61%)315(21.40%)254(17.77%)
01207(69.25%)1223(71.06%)1018(69.16%)1021(71.45%)
287(4.99%)84(4.88%)69(4.69%)62(4.34%)
411(0.63%)11(0.64%)8(0.54%)4(0.28%)
62(0.11%)4(0.23%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114721429
Signed-rank (P)−46314(0.0000)−39225(0.0000)−34635.0(0.0000)−30105.0(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0777(44.55%)726(42.09%)670(45.98%)596(42.18%)
2710(40.71%)741(42.96%)588(40.36%)609(43.10%)
4245(14.05%)245(14.20%)193(13.25%)202(14.30%)
612(0.69%)13(0.75%)6(0.41%)6(0.42%)
Total1744172514571413
6 months after treatment-baseline
−627(1.55%)32(1.86%)21(1.44%)29(2.06%)
−477(4.42%)73(4.24%)66(4.53%)63(4.47%)
−2427(24.50%)396(23.01%)378(25.96%)343(24.34%)
01129(64.77%)1125(65.37%)936(64.29%)914(64.87%)
279(4.53%)75(4.36%)53(3.64%)52(3.69%)
44(0.23%)17(0.99%)2(0.14%)7(0.50%)
60(0.00%)3(0.17%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114561409
Signed-rank (P)−72188(0.0000)−60736(0.0000)−55351.0(0.0000)−47590.0(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0825(47.31%)778(45.10%)708(49.06%)642(46.42%)
2701(40.19%)762(44.17%)574(39.78%)613(44.32%)
4205(11.75%)168(9.74%)155(10.74%)120(8.68%)
613(0.75%)17(0.99%)6(0.42%)8(0.58%)
Total1744172514431383
9 months after treatment-baseline
−634(1.95%)32(1.86%)27(1.87%)28(2.03%)
−486(4.93%)100(5.81%)73(5.06%)88(6.38%)
−2485(27.83%)464(26.96%)430(29.82%)408(29.59%)
01050(60.24%)1031(59.91%)852(59.08%)803(58.23%)
279(4.53%)73(4.24%)53(3.68%)46(3.34%)
48(0.46%)16(0.93%)6(0.42%)5(0.36%)
61(0.06%)5(0.29%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114421379
Signed-rank (P)−92350(0.0000)−86673(0.0000)−70632.0(0.0000)−69556.0(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0909(52.12%)851(49.33%)788(55.03%)707(51.49%)
2683(39.16%)764(44.29%)553(38.62%)615(44.79%)
4140(8.03%)95(5.51%)87(6.08%)47(3.42%)
612(0.69%)15(0.87%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1744172514321373
12 months after treatment-baseline
−638(2.18%)37(2.15%)31(2.17%)33(2.41%)
−4111(6.37%)118(6.86%)98(6.85%)106(7.74%)
−2552(31.67%)552(32.07%)492(34.38%)489(35.72%)
0975(55.94%)930(54.04%)774(54.09%)703(51.35%)
261(3.50%)63(3.66%)33(2.31%)35(2.56%)
43(0.17%)16(0.93%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
63(0.17%)5(0.29%)3(0.21%)0(0.00%)
Total1743172114311369
Signed-rank (P)−125E3(0.0000)−122E3(0.0000)−97476.0(0.0000)−100131(0.0000)
Follow-up
0774(53.64%)716(51.70%)753(53.48%)693(51.37%)
2522(36.17%)544(39.28%)512(36.36%)533(39.51%)
4144(9.98%)122(8.81%)141(10.01%)120(8.90%)
63(0.21%)3(0.22%)2(0.14%)3(0.22%)
Total1443138514081349
Follow-up-baseline
−627(1.87%)34(2.46%)27(1.92%)32(2.38%)
−4106(7.35%)112(8.11%)103(7.32%)110(8.18%)
−2441(30.56%)417(30.20%)428(30.40%)404(30.04%)
0812(56.27%)773(55.97%)795(56.46%)757(56.28%)
250(3.47%)41(2.97%)49(3.48%)38(2.83%)
45(0.35%)4(0.29%)4(0.28%)4(0.30%)
62(0.14%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
Total1443138114081345
Signed-rank (P)−83429(0.0000)−81093(0.0000)−79062.5(0.0000)−76168.0(0.0000)
TABLE 15 — test of duration period in different observations
FASPP
Itemstest methodStatisticP valuestatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.160.87301.180.2390
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.130.89980.540.5866
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.690.4881−0.010.9929
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.460.64800.790.4318
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.890.37490.320.7476
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.240.21481.950.0508
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test1.040.29810.600.5475
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.580.56090.720.4739
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.070.9429−0.980.3254
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.830.40501.110.2675
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.160.8740−1.290.1967
Follow-upRank-sum test0.620.53380.720.4703
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test−0.950.3401−0.950.3441
TABLE 16 — change of pain in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl grouptrial groupControl grouptrial group
Baseline
0480(27.54%)446(25.92%)404(26.99%)359(24.81%)
2672(38.55%)693(40.27%)566(37.81%)561(38.77%)
4561(32.19%)544(31.61%)501(33.47%)495(34.21%)
630(1.72%)38(2.21%)26(1.74%)32(2.21%)
Total1743172114971447
1 month after treatment
0637(36.53%)604(35.01%)540(36.29%)499(34.51%)
2640(36.70%)652(37.80%)536(36.02%)533(36.86%)
4451(25.86%)458(26.55%)400(26.88%)405(28.01%)
616(0.92%)11(0.64%)12(0.81%)9(0.62%)
Total1744172514881446
1 month after treatment-baseline
−67(0.40%)12(0.70%)6(0.40%)10(0.69%)
−470(4.02%)63(3.66%)61(4.10%)56(3.88%)
−2231(13.25%)252(14.64%)198(13.32%)213(14.77%)
01353(77.62%)1295(75.25%)1155(77.67%)1092(75.73%)
267(3.84%)80(4.65%)55(3.70%)60(4.16%)
415(0.86%)19(1.10%)12(0.81%)11(0.76%)
Total1743172114871442
Signed-rank (P)−22991(0.0000)−25059(0.0000)−17174.0(0.0000)−19115.5(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0697(39.97%)657(38.09%)595(40.39%)543(37.89%)
2635(36.41%)665(38.55%)522(35.44%)548(38.24%)
4402(23.05%)392(22.72%)349(23.69%)335(23.38%)
610(0.57%)11(0.64%)7(0.48%)7(0.49%)
Total1744172514731433
3 months after treatment-baseline
−68(0.46%)9(0.52%)7(0.48%)7(0.49%)
−489(5.11%)102(5.93%)77(5.23%)89(6.23%)
−2333(19.10%)312(18.13%)287(19.50%)268(18.75%)
01213(69.59%)1197(69.55%)1026(69.70%)999(69.91%)
281(4.65%)77(4.47%)63(4.28%)53(3.71%)
419(1.09%)23(1.34%)12(0.82%)13(0.91%)
60(0.00%)1(0.06%)
Total1743172114721429
Signed-rank (P)−44649(0.0000)−42845(0.0000)−34044.0(0.0000)−32957.0(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0780(44.72%)726(42.09%)671(46.09%)596(42.18%)
2616(35.32%)655(37.97%)506(34.75%)543(38.43%)
4340(19.50%)333(19.30%)274(18.82%)269(19.04%)
68(0.46%)11(0.64%)5(0.34%)5(0.35%)
Total1744172514561413
6 months after treatment-baseline
−610(0.57%)14(0.81%)9(0.62%)11(0.78%)
−4120(6.88%)115(6.68%)107(7.35%)101(7.17%)
−2403(23.12%)405(23.53%)352(24.19%)348(24.70%)
01114(63.91%)1081(62.81%)923(63.44%)887(62.95%)
283(4.76%)82(4.76%)58(3.99%)53(3.76%)
413(0.75%)23(1.34%)6(0.41%)8(0.57%)
60(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114551409
Signed-rank (P)−71668(0.0000)−69120(0.0000)−56168.0(0.0000)−53434.0(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0825(47.31%)777(45.04%)707(49.03%)640(46.34%)
2617(35.38%)641(37.16%)501(34.74%)514(37.22%)
4293(16.80%)293(16.99%)230(15.95%)223(16.15%)
69(0.52%)14(0.81%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1744172514421381
9 months after treatment-baseline
−611(0.63%)15(0.87%)10(0.69%)12(0.87%)
−4143(8.20%)145(8.43%)127(8.81%)129(9.37%)
−2450(25.82%)430(24.99%)396(27.48%)365(26.51%)
01039(59.61%)1026(59.62%)840(58.29%)815(59.19%)
285(4.88%)78(4.53%)59(4.09%)49(3.56%)
415(0.86%)23(1.34%)9(0.62%)6(0.44%)
60(0.00%)4(0.23%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114411377
Signed-rank (P)−92083(0.0000)−84708(0.0000)−72287.0(0.0000)−65486.0(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0910(52.18%)850(49.28%)788(55.07%)706(51.42%)
2589(33.77%)606(35.13%)469(32.77%)481(35.03%)
4237(13.59%)254(14.72%)173(12.09%)183(13.33%)
68(0.46%)15(0.87%)1(0.07%)3(0.22%)
Total1744172514311373
12 months after treatment-baseline
−612(0.69%)16(0.93%)10(0.70%)13(0.95%)
−4182(10.44%)170(9.88%)165(11.54%)153(11.18%)
−2489(28.06%)471(27.37%)433(30.28%)403(29.44%)
0976(56.00%)972(56.48%)774(54.13%)761(55.59%)
276(4.36%)68(3.95%)46(3.22%)37(2.70%)
48(0.46%)19(1.10%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)
60(0.00%)5(0.29%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Total1743172114301369
Signed-rank (P)−12E4(0.0000)−106E3(0.0000)−95582.0(0.0000)−83290.5(0.0000)
Follow-up
0774(53.64%)716(51.70%)753(53.48%)693(51.37%)
2477(33.06%)472(34.08%)469(33.31%)465(34.47%)
4190(13.17%)196(14.15%)185(13.14%)190(14.08%)
62(0.14%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Total1443138514081349
Follow-up-baseline
−612(0.83%)13(0.94%)12(0.85%)12(0.89%)
−4165(11.43%)162(11.73%)162(11.51%)158(11.75%)
−2418(28.97%)405(29.33%)409(29.05%)394(29.29%)
0783(54.26%)748(54.16%)762(54.12%)732(54.42%)
253(3.67%)40(2.90%)53(3.76%)37(2.75%)
411(0.76%)13(0.94%)9(0.64%)12(0.89%)
61(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Total1443138114081345
Signed-rank (P)−89749(0.0000)−84482(0.0000)−86649.0(0.0000)−79905.5(0.0000)
TABLE 17 — test of change of pain in different observations
FASPP
Itemstest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.640.52501.220.2229
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.700.48480.910.3621
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.240.8121−0.680.4946
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.710.48060.860.3910
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.010.9895−0.480.6285
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.180.23961.640.1004
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.040.9698−0.230.8215
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.200.22931.180.2368
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.240.8095−0.250.7995
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.840.06521.960.0500
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.750.45530.270.7867
Follow-upRank-sum test1.070.28401.140.2527
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test−0.610.5420−0.520.6037
TABLE 18 — change of dose of nitroglycerin in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0927(53.40%)881(51.25%)792(53.05%)733(50.73%)
11(0.06%)1(0.06%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
2562(32.37%)590(34.32%)482(32.28%)495(34.26%)
4172(9.91%)175(10.18%)155(10.38%)153(10.59%)
674(4.26%)72(4.19%)63(4.22%)63(4.36%)
Total1736171914931445
1 month after treatment
01039(59.78%)1000(58.00%)884(59.61%)840(58.17%)
15(0.29%)2(0.12%)4(0.27%)1(0.07%)
2503(28.94%)548(31.79%)436(29.40%)456(31.58%)
4133(7.65%)122(7.08%)111(7.48%)103(7.13%)
658(3.34%)52(3.02%)48(3.24%)44(3.05%)
Total1738172414831444
1 month after treatment-baseline
−69(0.52%)17(0.99%)8(0.54%)16(1.11%)
−437(2.13%)42(2.44%)34(2.29%)35(2.43%)
−2198(11.41%)198(11.52%)171(11.54%)164(11.40%)
−31(0.06%)0(0.00%)
01398(80.53%)1361(79.17%)1191(80.36%)1155(80.26%)
−10(0.00%)1(0.06%)
13(0.17%)0(0.00%)3(0.20%)0(0.00%)
268(3.92%)82(4.77%)56(3.78%)55(3.82%)
418(1.04%)13(0.76%)15(1.01%)11(0.76%)
64(0.23%)5(0.29%)4(0.27%)3(0.21%)
Total1736171914821439
Signed-rank (P)−12666(0.0000)−14773(0.0000)−9718.00(0.0000)−10692.5(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
01079(61.98%)1044(60.52%)926(62.95%)863(60.43%)
111(0.63%)10(0.58%)11(0.75%)10(0.70%)
2515(29.58%)550(31.88%)428(29.10%)457(32.00%)
491(5.23%)81(4.70%)73(4.96%)67(4.69%)
645(2.58%)40(2.32%)33(2.24%)31(2.17%)
Total1741172514711428
3 months after treatment-baseline
−612(0.69%)17(0.99%)10(0.68%)16(1.13%)
−52(0.12%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
−451(2.94%)61(3.55%)46(3.14%)50(3.52%)
−2263(15.15%)268(15.59%)232(15.81%)223(15.68%)
−15(0.29%)8(0.47%)5(0.34%)8(0.56%)
01306(75.23%)1268(73.76%)1101(5.05%)1057(74.33%)
13(0.17%)1(0.06%)3(0.20%)1(0.07%)
277(4.44%)80(4.65%)55(3.75%)54(3.80%)
412(0.69%)11(0.64%)8(0.55%)9(0.63%)
65(0.29%)5(0.29%5(0.34%)4(0.28%)
Total1736171914671422
Signed-rank (P)−25905(0.0000)−29747(0.0000)−20832.0(0.0000)−21134.5(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
01139(65.38%)1091(63.25%)976(67.13%)901(64.04%)
115(0.86%)32(1.86%)15(1.03%)32(2.27%)
2492(28.24%)499(28.93%)405(27.85%)406(28.86%)
463(3.62%)60(3.48%)40(2.75%)37(2.63%)
633(1.89%)43(2.49%)18(1.24%)31(2.20%)
Total1742172514541407
6 months after treatment-baseline
−618(1.04%)22(1.28%)15(1.03%)20(1.43%)
−53(0.17%)1(0.06%)3(0.21%)1(0.07%)
−470(4.03%)77(4.48%)64(4.41%)66(4.71%)
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)
−2321(18.49%)311(18.09%)282(19.43%)260(18.54%)
−14(0.23%)17(0.99%)4(0.28%)17(1.21%)
01216(70.05%)1176(68.41%)1008(69.47%)963(68.69%)
17(0.40%)11(0.64%)7(0.48%)11(0.78%)
284(4.84%)73(4.25%)60(4.14%)43(3.07%)
47(0.40%)21(1.22%)4(0.28%)15(1.07%)
66(0.35%)8(0.47%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1736171914511402
Signed-rank (P)−43476(0.0000)−43631(0.0000)−34895.0(0.0000)−33070.5(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
01169(67.11%)1143(66.26%)993(68.96%)940(68.31%)
118(1.03%)26(1.51%)18(1.25%)24(1.74%)
2483(27.73%)467(27.07%)395(27.43%)362(26.31%)
442(2.41%)50(2.90%)20(1.39%)26(1.89%)
630(1.72%)39(2.26%)14(0.97%)24(1.74%)
Total1742172514401376
9 months after treatment-baseline
−624(1.38%)26(1.51%)20(1.39%)24(1.75%)
−53(0.17%)1(0.06%)3(0.21%)1(0.07%)
−474(4.26%)90(5.24%)67(4.67%)78(5.69%)
−32(0.12%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)2(0.15%)
−2350(20.16%)340(19.78%)307(21.38%)284(20.71%)
−18(0.46%)16(0.93%)8(0.56%)15(1.09%)
01171(67.45%)1127(65.56%)955(66.50%)898(65.50%)
16(0.35%)8(0.47%)6(0.42%)7(0.51%)
284(4.84%)87(5.06%)60(4.18%)52(3.79%)
48(0.46%)13(0.76%)4(0.28%)5(0.36%)
66(0.35%)9(0.52%)4(0.28%)5(0.36%)
Total1736171914361371
Signed-rank (P)−53222(0.0000)−55218(0.0000)−42481.5(0.0000)−41759.0(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
01247(71.58%)1200(69.57%)1069(74.81%)989(72.30%)
119(1.09%)19(1.10%)19(1.33%)19(1.39%)
2411(23.59%)427(24.75%)317(22.18%)321(23.46%)
436(2.07%)47(2.72%)13(0.91%)21(1.54%)
629(1.66%)32(1.86%)11(0.77%)18(1.32%)
Total1742172514291368
12 months after treatment-baseline
−632(1.84%)31(1.80%)27(1.89%)28(2.05%)
−51(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−486(4.95%)97(5.64%)78(5.47%)83(6.09%)
−31(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−2378(21.77%)382(22.22%)333(23.37%)323(23.70%)
−19(0.52%)13(0.76%)9(0.63%)13(0.95%)
01138(65.55%)1084(63.06%)921(64.63%)855(62.73%)
19(0.52%)5(0.29%)9(0.63%)5(0.37%)
269(3.97%)85(4.94%)41(2.88%)49(3.60%)
47(0.40%)16(0.93%)1(0.07%)5(0.37%)
66(0.35%)6(0.35%)4(0.28%)2(0.15%)
Total1736171914251363
Signed-rank (P)−65699(0.0000)−67124(0.0000)−52730.0(0.0000)−51415.5(0.0000)
Follow-up
01069(74.24%)1017(73.80%)1044(74.31%)989(73.70%)
113(0.90%)16(1.16%)13(0.93%)16(1.19%)
2334(23.19%)316(22.93%)325(23.13%)309(23.03%)
415(1.04%)16(1.16%)14(1.00%)16(1.19%)
69(0.63%)13(0.94%)9(0.64%)12(0.89%)
Total1440137814051342
Follow-up-baseline
−627(1.88%)31(2.26%)26(1.86%)30(2.24%)
−52(0.14%)3(0.22%)2(0.14%)3(0.22%)
−492(6.41%)95(6.92%)90(6.42%)91(6.81%)
−32(0.14%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)
−2313(21.81%)334(24.33%)309(22.06%)322(24.08%)
−16(0.42%)6(0.44%)6(0.43%)6(0.45%)
0924(64.39%)832(60.60%)899(64.17%)815(60.96%)
14(0.28%)5(0.36%)4(0.29%)5(0.37%)
258(4.04%)61(4.44%)56(4.00%)60(4.49%)
44(0.28%)3(0.22%)4(0.29%)2(0.15%)
63(0.21%)2(0.15%)3(0.21%)2(0.15%)
Total1435137314011337
Signed-rank (P)−50803(0.0000)−58107(0.0000)−49134.5(0.0000)−54176.5(0.0000)
TABLE 19 — test of change of nitroglycerin dose in different observations Analysis method was referred to the section of anginal pectoris.
FASPP
Itemstest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test1.080.28061.110.2656
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.740.45900.600.5469
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.390.6930−0.700.4825
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.630.52741.220.2225
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.910.3643−0.530.5993
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.170.24331.630.1030
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.300.7667−0.340.7302
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.630.53120.500.6178
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.300.7663−0.720.4731
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.400.16131.650.0988
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.140.8891−0.440.6567
Follow-upRank-sum test0.290.77280.390.6974
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test−1.620.1059−1.310.1917
1.6.4.3 TCM symptom score
TABLE 20 — change of total score of TCM symptom in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1471(29)1419(37)
Mean (SD)13.83(7.27)13.98(7.06)13.96(7.25)14.36(7.08)
Min, Max0.00, 37.000.00, 36.000.00, 37.000.00, 36.00
Md (Q3-Q1)13.00(10.00)13.00(10.00)13.00(11.00)14.00(9.00)
1 month after treatment
N (Missing)1717(42)1699(47)1467(33)1423(33)
Mean (SD)11.84(7.16)11.96(7.05)11.93(7.18)12.20(7.15)
Min, Max0.00, 34.000.00, 37.000.00, 34.000.00, 37.00
Md (Q3-Q1)11.00(9.00)11.00(9.00)11.00(10.00)12.00(10.00)
1 month after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1462(38)1414(42)
Mean (SD)−1.96(4.63)−1.99(4.58)−2.00(4.58)−2.14(4.52)
Min, Max−33.00, 24.00−25.00, 20.00−28.00, 24.00−25.00, 19.00
Md (Q3-Q1)0.00(3.00)0.00(3.00)−1.00(3.00)0.00(4.00)
Pairing t-test (P)−17.50(0.0000)−17.85(0.0000)−16.65(0.0000)−17.82(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
N (Missing)1717(42)1700(46)1447(53)1408(48)
Mean (SD)10.90(6.88)11.05(6.84)10.88(6.85)11.17(6.84)
Min, Max0.00, 33.000.00, 36.000.00, 33.000.00, 34.00
Md (Q3-Q1)10.00(9.00)11.00(9.00)10.00(9.00)11.00(9.00)
3 month after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1444(56)1400(56)
Mean (SD)−2.91(5.22)−2.91(5.16)−3.05(5.19)−3.18(5.03)
Min, Max−33.00, 19.00−27.00, 19.00−28.00, 19.00−27.00, 17.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−2.00(5.00)−2.00(5.00)−2.00(5.00)−2.00(6.00)
Pairing t-test (P)−23.05(0.0000)−23.16(0.0000)−22.32(0.0000)−23.65(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
N (Missing)1718(41)1700(46)1430(70)1388(68)
Mean (SD)10.04(6.65)10.15(6.49)9.79(6.47)10.10(6.33)
Min, Max0.00, 34.000.00, 36.000.00, 34.000.00, 36.00
Md (Q3-Q1)9.00(9.00)10.00(7.00)9.00(8.00)10.00(7.00)
6 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1427(73)1381(75)
Mean (SD)−3.76(5.57)−3.81(5.69)−4.11(5.49)−4.26(5.48)
Min, Max−33.00, 19.00−26.00, 27.00−28.00, 19.00−26.00, 27.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−3.00(6.00)−3.00(6.00)−3.00(6.00)−3.00(6.00)
Pairing t-test (P)−27.95(0.0000)−27.52(0.0000)−28.25(0.0000)−28.88(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
N (Missing)1718(41)1700(46)1416(84)1360(96)
Mean (SD)9.29(6.35)9.31(6.27)8.88(6.04)8.98(5.93)
Min, Max0.00, 37.000.00, 36.000.00, 37.000.00, 36.00
Md (Q3-Q1)8.00(8.00)9.00(8.00)8.00(7.00)9.00(7.00)
9 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1412(88)1354(102)
Mean (SD)−4.52(5.90)−4.65(6.15)−5.04(5.80)−5.36(5.70)
Min, Max−33.00, 15.00−28.00, 27.002−8.00, 15.00−28.00, 26.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−4.00(8.00)−4.00(7.00)−4.00(7.00)−5.00(7.00)
Pairing t-test (P)−31.68(0.0000)−31.09(0.0000)−32.62(0.0000)−34.56(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
N (Missing)1718(41)1700(46)1403(97)1350(106)
Mean (SD)8.41(6.11)8.42(5.97)7.81(5.56)7.84(5.34)
Min, Max0.00, 37.000.00, 36.000.00, 28.000.00, 28.00
Md (Q3-Q1)8.00(8.00)8.00(8.00)7.00(7.00)8.00(8.00)
12 months after treatment-baseline
N (Missing)1710(49)1689(57)1399(101)1344(112)
Mean (SD)−5.39(6.23)−5.54(6.49)−6.09(6.07)−6.54(5.84)
Min, Max−33.00, 18.00−28.00, 27.00−28.00, 18.00−28.00, 15.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−5.00(8.00)−5.00(8.00)−5.00(8.00)−6.00(8.00)
Pairing t-test (P)-35.76(0.0000)-35.06(0.0000)-37.53(0.0000)-41.04(0.0000)
Follow-up
N (Missing)1429(330)1379(367)1395(105)1343(113)
Mean (SD)7.71(6.03)7.85(5.94)7.73(6.04)7.88(5.92)
Min, Max0.00, 32.000.00, 33.000.00, 32.000.00, 33.00
Md (Q3-Q1)7.00(7.00)7.00(8.00)7.00(7.00)7.00(8.00)
Follow-up-baseline
N (Missing)1425(334)1373(373)1391(109)1337(119)
Mean (SD)−6.18(6.52)−6.48(6.17)−6.16(6.52)−6.45(6.15)
Min, Max−29.00, 27.00−28.00, 24.00−29.00, 27.00−28.00, 24.00
Md (Q3-Q1)−5.00(8.00)−6.00(8.00)−5.00(8.00)−6.00(8.00)
Pairing t-test (P)−35.76(0.0000)−38.90(0.0000)−35.23(0.0000)−38.34(0.0000)
TABLE 21 — Distribution of total score of TCM symptom in differentobservations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Mild828(48.48%)772(45.82%)701(47.69%)617(43.57%)
Medium817(47.83%)855(50.74%)717(48.78%)750(52.97%)
Severe63(3.69%)58(3.44%)52(3.54%)49(3.46%)
Total1708168514701416
1 month after treatment
Mild989(58.76%)975(58.24%)847(57.93%)814(57.24%)
Medium675(40.11%)673(40.20%)600(41.04%)586(41.21%)
Severe19(1.13%)26(1.55%)15(1.03%)22(1.55%)
Total1683167414621422
3 months after treatment
Mild1066(65.56%)1064(65.80%)946(65.38%)911(64.84%)
Medium546(33.58%)538(33.27%)489(33.79%)481(34.23%)
Severe14(0.86%)15(0.93%)12(0.83%)13(0.93%)
Total1626161714471405
6 months after treatment
Mild1133(72.63%)1110(72.08%)1044(73.11%)996(71.76%)
Medium418(26.79%)420(27.27%)377(26.40%)384(27.67%)
Severe9(0.58%)10(0.65%)7(0.49%)8(0.58%)
Total1560154014281388
9 months after treatment
Mild1149(76.70%)1113(77.24%)1088(76.94%)1045(77.06%)
Medium345(23.03%)323(22.41%)323(22.84%)307(22.64%)
Severe4(0.27%)5(0.35%)3(0.21%)4(0.29%)
Total1498144114141356
12 months after treatment
Mild1205(83.62%)1141(82.38%)1172(83.59%)1108(82.20%)
Medium235(16.31%)241(17.40%)229(16.33%)237(17.58%)
Severe1(0.07%)3(0.22%)1(0.07%)3(0.22%)
Total1441138514021348
Follow-up
Mild1205(84.50%)1148(83.37%)1177(84.55%)1116(83.22%)
Medium218(15.29%)226(16.41%)212(15.23%)222(16.55%)
Severe3(0.21%)3(0.22%)3(0.22%)3(0.22%)
Total1426137713921341
TABLE 22 — Test of distribution of total score of TCM symptomin different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test1.400.16282.080.0378
1 monthRank-sum test0.400.68660.490.6253
after treatment
3 monthsRank-sum test−0.130.89710.320.7520
after treatment
6 monthsRank-sum test0.350.72450.810.4172
after treatment
9 monthsRank-sum test−0.330.7401−0.060.9498
after treatment
12 monthsRank-sum test0.890.37160.990.3219
after treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.820.41490.950.3439
TABLE 23 — change of chest pain in different observations
FASPP
Control groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0473(27.68%)443(26.26%)398(27.07%)352(24.82%)
3641(37.51%)679(40.25%)546(37.14%)562(39.63%)
6568(33.24%)534(31.65%)505(34.35%)476(33.57%)
927(1.58%)31(1.84%)21(1.43%)28(1.97%)
Total1709168714701418
1 month after treatment
0608(35.41%)579(34.08%)515(35.13%)471(33.15%)
3635(36.98%)663(39.02%)537(36.63%)551(38.78%)
6461(26.85%)445(26.19%)406(27.69%)390(27.45%)
913(0.76%)12(0.71%)8(0.55%)9(0.63%)
Total1717169914661421
1 month after treatment-baseline
−90(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−616(0.94%)19(1.13%)12(0.82%)11(0.78%)
−359(3.45%)64(3.79%)50(3.42%)46(3.26%)
01344(78.64%)1302(77.18%)1146(78.49%)1097(77.75%)
3226(13.22%)243(14.40%)197(13.49%)204(14.46%)
660(3.51%)54(3.20%)52(3.56%)48(3.40%)
94(0.23%)4(0.24%)3(0.21%)4(0.28%)
Total1709168714601411
Signed-rank (P)19785(0.0000)20378(0.0000)15173.50(0.0000)15562.50(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0656(38.21%)627(36.88%)550(38.01%)502(35.68%)
3643(37.45%)669(39.35%)535(36.97%)562(39.94%)
6410(23.88%)391(23.00%)356(24.60%)337(23.95%)
98(0.47%)13(0.76%)6(0.41%)6(0.43%)
Total1717170014471407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−620(1.17%)22(1.30%)14(0.97%)12(0.86%)
−90(0.00%)1(0.06%)
−379(4.62%)75(4.45%)64(4.44%)52(3.72%)
01203(70.39%)1186(70.30%)1019(70.62%)993(71.03%)
3325(19.02%)329(19.50%)279(19.33%)278(19.89%)
676(4.45%)71(4.21%)63(4.37%)61(4.36%)
96(0.35%)3(0.18%)4(0.28%)2(0.14%)
Total1709168714431398
Signed-rank (P)39088(0.0000)37267(0.0000)28694.00(0.0000)28097.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0729(42.43%)692(40.71%)613(42.93%)549(39.61%)
3638(37.14%)664(39.06%)539(37.75%)561(40.48%)
6345(20.08%)334(19.65%)272(19.05%)272(19.62%)
96(0.35%)10(0.59%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1718170014281386
6 months after treatment-baseline
−90(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−613(0.76%)22(1.30%)5(0.35%)9(0.65%)
−380(4.68%)87(5.16%)57(4.00%)61(4.43%)
01104(64.60%)1060(62.83%)919(64.54%)869(63.06%)
3405(23.70%)420(24.90%)352(24.72%)355(25.76%)
6101(5.91%)92(5.45%)86(6.04%)79(5.73%)
96(0.35%)5(0.30%)5(0.35%)4(0.29%)
Total1709168714241378
Signed-rank (P)65165(0.0000)63298(0.0000)49922.50(0.0000)47527.50(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0791(46.04%)741(43.59%)661(46.71%)594(43.68%)
3618(35.97%)653(38.41%)519(36.68%)536(39.41%)
6305(17.75%)291(17.12%)233(16.47%)225(16.54%)
94(0.23%)15(0.88%)2(0.14%)5(0.37%)
Total1718170014151360
9 months after treatment-baseline
−90(0.00%)6(0.36%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
−613(0.76%)22(1.30%)7(0.50%)6(0.44%)
−381(4.74%)73(4.33%)58(4.11%)49(3.62%)
01022(59.80%)1005(59.57%)826(58.58%)803(59.35%)
3463(27.09%)465(27.56%)409(29.01%)392(28.97%)
6124(7.26%)111(6.58%)106(7.52%)96(7.10%)
96(0.35%)5(0.30%)4(0.28%)4(0.30%)
Total1709168714101353
Signed-rank (P)88123(0.0000)79406(0.0000)68170.00(0.0000)60337.50(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0858(49.94%)820(48.24%)725(51.67%)666(49.33%)
3607(35.33%)613(36.06%)501(35.71%)496(36.74%)
6248(14.44%)252(14.82%)176(12.54%)186(13.78%)
95(0.29%)15(0.88%)1(0.07%)2(0.15%)
Total1718170014031350
12 months after treatment-baseline
−69(0.53%)20(1.19%)2(0.14%)4(0.30%)
−90(0.00%)6(0.36%)
−370(4.10%)64(3.79%)45(3.22%)36(2.68%)
0962(56.29%)948(56.19%)760(54.36%)750(55.85%)
3511(29.90%)501(29.70%)455(32.55%)422(31.42%)
6150(8.78%)141(8.36%)131(9.37%)125(9.31%)
97(0.41%)7(0.41%)5(0.36%)6(0.45%)
Total1709168713981343
Signed-rank (P)113370(0.000101285(0.0000)89514.00(0.0000)77706.50(0.0000)
Follow-up
0754(52.84%)698(50.73%)733(52.62%)675(50.37%)
21(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3479(33.57%)488(35.47%)472(33.88%)479(35.75%)
6192(13.45%)188(13.66%)186(13.35%)184(13.73%)
91(0.07%)2(0.15%)1(0.07%)2(0.15%)
Total1427137613931340
Follow-up-baseline
−91(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.08%)
−611(0.77%)11(0.80%)9(0.65%)10(0.75%)
−347(3.31%)44(3.21%)47(3.39%)41(3.08%)
−21(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
0769(54.08%)737(53.83%)750(54.03%)723(54.24%)
3426(29.96%)424(30.97%)417(30.04%)411(30.83%)
6158(11.11%)142(10.37%)155(11.17%)137(10.28%)
99(0.63%)10(0.73%)8(0.58%)10(0.75%)
Total1422136913881333
Signed-rank (P)88781(0.0000)83074(0.0000)85383.50(0.0000)78026.00(0.0000)
TABLE 24 — test of change of chest pain in different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.040.96720.730.4677
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.270.78870.660.5063
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.180.85920.590.5581
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.390.69790.670.5031
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.040.96830.560.5785
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.710.47541.490.1367
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.190.8458−0.040.9667
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.170.24161.350.1761
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.490.6257−0.180.8581
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.130.26031.350.1779
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.660.5079−0.360.7154
Follow-upRank-sum test1.010.31201.100.2717
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test0.070.9467−0.030.9763
TABLE 25 — change of chest tightness in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0473(27.68%)443(26.26%)398(27.07%)352(24.82%)
3641(37.51%)679(40.25%)546(37.14%)562(39.63%)
6568(33.24%)534(31.65%)505(34.35%)476(33.57%)
927(1.58%)31(1.84%)21(1.43%)28(1.97%)
Total1709168714701418
1 month after treatment
0608(35.41%)579(34.08%)515(35.13%)471(33.15%)
3635(36.98%)663(39.02%)537(36.63%)551(38.78%)
6461(26.85%)445(26.19%)406(27.69%)390(27.45%)
913(0.76%)12(0.71%)8(0.55%)9(0.63%)
Total1717169914661421
1 month after treatment-baseline
−67(0.41%)6(0.36%)6(0.41%)3(0.21%)
−376(4.45%)79(4.69%)62(4.25%)58(4.11%)
01302(76.18%)1273(75.50%)1110(76.03%)1067(75.57%)
3298(17.44%)298(17.67%)259(17.74%)259(18.34%)
621(1.23%)26(1.54%)19(1.30%)21(1.49%)
95(0.29%)4(0.24%)4(0.27%)4(0.28%)
Total1709168614601412
Signed-rank (P)24545(0.0000)25454(0.0000)18726.50(0.0000)19632.00(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0656(38.21%)627(36.88%)550(38.01%)502(35.68%)
3643(37.45%)669(39.35%)535(36.97%)562(39.94%)
6410(23.88%)391(23.00%)356(24.60%)337(23.95%)
98(0.47%)13(0.76%)6(0.41%)6(0.43%)
Total1717170014471407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−91(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−68(0.47%)8(0.47%)6(0.42%)4(0.29%)
−385(4.97%)92(5.46%)70(4.85%)62(4.43%)
01190(69.63%)1141(67.67%)994(68.88%)944(67.53%)
3383(22.41%)407(24.14%)334(23.15%)356(25.46%)
637(2.17%)34(2.02%)34(2.36%)28(2.00%)
95(0.29%)4(0.24%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1709168614431398
Signed-rank (P)43093(0.0000)47229(0.0000)33343.50(0.0000)36915.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0729(42.43%)692(40.71%)613(42.93%)549(39.61%)
3638(37.14%)664(39.06%)539(37.75%)561(40.48%)
6345(20.08%)334(19.65%)272(19.05%)272(19.62%)
96(0.35%)10(0.59%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Total1718170014281386
6 months after treatment-baseline
−91(0.06%)1(0.06%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−63(0.18%)14(0.83%)3(0.21%)7(0.51%)
−388(5.15%)88(5.22%)64(4.49%)56(4.06%)
01105(64.66%)1046(62.04%)904(63.44%)846(61.30%)
11(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3459(26.86%)482(28.59%)407(28.56%)427(30.94%)
648(2.81%)51(3.02%)42(2.95%)41(2.97%)
94(0.23%)4(0.24%)3(0.21%)3(0.22%)
Total1709168614251380
Signed-rank (P)64831(0.0000)68356(0.0000)50818.00(0.0000)54318.00(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0791(46.04%)741(43.59%)661(46.71%)594(43.68%)
3618(35.97%)653(38.41%)519(36.68%)536(39.41%)
6305(17.75%)291(17.12%)233(16.47%)225(16.54%)
94(0.23%)15(0.88%)2(0.14%)5(0.37%)
Total1718170014151360
9 months after treatment-baseline
−90(0.00%)4(0.24%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−63(0.18%)14(0.83%)3(0.21%)3(0.22%)
−393(5.44%)80(4.74%)65(4.61%)49(3.62%)
01007(58.92%)946(56.11%)801(56.81%)735(54.32%)
3534(31.25%)566(33.57%)476(33.76%)502(37.10%)
668(3.98%)71(4.21%)62(4.40%)59(4.36%)
94(0.23%)5(0.30%)3(0.21%)4(0.30%)
Total1709168614101353
Signed-rank (P)92186(0.0000)98615(0.0000)73535.50(0.0000)79748.00(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0858(49.94%)820(48.24%)725(51.67%)666(49.33%)
3607(35.33%)613(36.06%)501(35.71%)496(36.74%)
6248(14.44%)252(14.82%)176(12.54%)186(13.78%)
95(0.29%)15(0.88%)1(0.07%)2(0.15%)
Total1718170014031350
12 months after treatment-baseline
−90(0.00%)5(0.30%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−63(0.18%)12(0.71%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
−383(4.86%)63(3.74%)54(3.86%)29(2.16%)
0933(54.59%)837(49.64%)721(51.54%)623(46.39%)
3598(34.99%)673(39.92%)539(38.53%)605(45.05%)
687(5.09%)89(5.28%)79(5.65%)79(5.88%)
95(0.29%)7(0.42%)4(0.29%)6(0.45%)
Total1709168613991343
Signed-rank (P)120256(0.0000)143536(0.0000)97784.50(0.0000)119855.5(0.0000)
Follow-up
0754(52.84%)698(50.73%)733(52.62%)675(50.37%)
21(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3479(33.57%)488(35.47%)472(33.88%)479(35.75%)
6192(13.45%)188(13.66%)186(13.35%)184(13.73%)
91(0.07%)2(0.15%)1(0.07%)2(0.15%)
Total1427137613931340
Follow-up-baseline
−91(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−64(0.28%)4(0.29%)4(0.29%)4(0.30%)
−355(3.86%)37(2.70%)54(3.88%)35(2.62%)
0728(51.09%)698(50.91%)712(51.19%)684(51.20%)
11(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3544(38.18%)535(39.02%)528(37.96%)520(38.92%)
687(6.11%)91(6.64%)86(6.18%)88(6.59%)
95(0.35%)6(0.44%)5(0.36%)5(0.37%)
Total1425137113911336
Signed-rank (P)101793(0.0000)100320(0.0000)96444.50(0.0000)94303.00(0.0000)
TABLE 26 — test of change of chest tightness in different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.040.96720.730.4677
1 month afterRank-sum test0.270.78870.660.5063
treatment
1 month afterRank-sum test0.250.80530.660.5082
treatment-baseline
3 months afterRank-sum test0.390.69790.670.5031
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.640.52181.240.2156
treatment-baseline
6 months afterRank-sum test0.710.47541.490.1367
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.750.45061.240.2140
treatment-baseline
9 months afterRank-sum test1.170.24161.350.1761
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test1.310.18921.870.0611
treatment-baseline
12 months afterRank-sum test1.130.26031.350.1779
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test2.780.00543.730.0002
treatment-baseline
Follow-upRank-sum test1.010.31201.100.2717
Follow-up-Rank-sum test1.130.25711.060.2878
baseline
TABLE 27 — change of short breath in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0257(15.04%)217(12.87%)213(14.48%)162(11.42%)
3886(51.84%)917(54.39%)752(51.12%)761(53.67%)
6533(31.19%)519(30.78%)479(32.56%)467(32.93%)
933(1.93%)33(1.96%)27(1.84%)28(1.97%)
Total1709168614711418
1 month after treatment
0363(21.14%)318(18.72%)303(20.68%)258(18.14%)
3931(54.22%)982(57.80%)787(53.72%)807(56.75%)
6410(23.88%)386(22.72%)365(24.91%)346(24.33%)
913(0.76%)13(0.77%)10(0.68%)11(0.77%)
Total1717169914651422
1 month after treatment-baseline
−60(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−48(0.47%)6(0.36%)7(0.48%)3(0.21%)
−290(5.26%)85(5.03%)77(5.27%)69(4.88%)
01323(77.37%)1310(77.56%)1132(77.53%)1099(77.72%)
2252(14.74%)255(15.10%)213(14.59%)214(15.13%)
430(1.75%)25(1.48%)25(1.71%)21(1.49%)
67(0.41%)7(0.41%)6(0.41%)7(0.50%)
Total1710168914601414
Signed-rank (P)19212(0.0000)19001(0.0000)13629.00(0.0000)13889.00(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0374(21.78%)354(20.82%)310(21.44%)288(20.47%)
31012(58.94%)1018(59.88%)855(59.13%)834(59.28%)
6318(18.52%)318(18.71%)271(18.74%)279(19.83%)
913(0.76%)10(0.59%)10(0.69%)6(0.43%)
Total1717170014461407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−60(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−42(0.12%)5(0.30%)2(0.14%)4(0.29%)
−293(5.44%)108(6.39%)76(5.27%)84(6.00%)
01219(71.29%)1181(69.92%)1014(70.27%)975(69.69%)
2350(20.47%)342(20.25%)309(21.41%)288(20.59%)
437(2.16%)45(2.66%)34(2.36%)40(2.86%)
69(0.53%)7(0.41%)8(0.55%)7(0.50%)
Total1710168914431399
Signed-rank (P)38821(0.0000)37407(0.0000)30642.50(0.0000)27385.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0430(25.03%)400(23.53%)360(25.21%)320(23.05%)
21(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3998(58.09%)1024(60.24%)838(58.68%)849(61.17%)
6280(16.30%)266(15.65%)222(15.55%)215(15.49%)
99(0.52%)10(0.59%)7(0.49%)4(0.29%)
Total1718170014281388
6 months after treatment-baseline
−62(0.12%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
−42(0.12%)7(0.41%)2(0.14%)4(0.29%)
−2102(5.96%)112(6.63%)76(5.33%)85(6.15%)
01109(64.85%)1077(63.77%)906(63.53%)859(62.20%)
2435(25.44%)426(25.22%)387(27.14%)374(27.08%)
451(2.98%)57(3.37%)45(3.16%)50(3.62%)
69(0.53%)10(0.59%)8(0.56%)9(0.65%)
Total1710168914261381
Signed-rank (P)60693(0.0000)59612(0.0000)48093.00(0.0000)46755.50(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0489(28.46%)473(27.82%)416(29.42%)387(28.46%)
3994(57.86%)1007(59.24%)824(58.27%)820(60.29%)
6227(13.21%)207(12.18%)169(11.95%)150(11.03%)
98(0.47%)13(0.76%)5(0.35%)3(0.22%)
Total1718170014141360
9 months after treatment-baseline
−61(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−44(0.23%)8(0.47%)2(0.14%)4(0.30%)
−2107(6.26%)109(6.45%)78(5.53%)76(5.61%)
01010(59.06%)976(57.79%)798(56.60%)746(55.10%)
2519(30.35%)519(30.73%)470(33.33%)464(34.27%)
461(3.57%)69(4.09%)54(3.83%)57(4.21%)
68(0.47%)8(0.47%)7(0.50%)7(0.52%)
Total1710168914101354
Signed-rank (P)85799(0.0000)87654(0.0000)70616.50(0.0000)69726.00(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0545(31.72%)549(32.29%)468(33.36%)462(34.22%)
3995(57.92%)1024(60.24%)820(58.45%)831(61.56%)
6173(10.07%)114(6.71%)115(8.20%)56(4.15%)
95(0.29%)13(0.76%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Total1718170014031350
12 months after treatment-treatment
−42(0.12%)6(0.36%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
−2108(6.32%)101(5.98%)75(5.36%)67(4.99%)
0955(55.85%)932(55.18%)743(53.11%)699(52.01%)
2563(32.92%)551(32.62%)506(36.17%)491(36.53%)
470(4.09%)87(5.15%)63(4.50%)75(5.58%)
612(0.70%)12(0.71%)11(0.79%)11(0.82%)
Total1710168913991344
Signed-rank (P)104992(0.0000)106281(0.0000)85309.50(0.0000)84844.50(0.0000)
Follow-up
0509(35.62%)470(34.08%)493(35.34%)455(33.88%)
21(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
3779(54.51%)781(56.64%)763(54.70%)763(56.81%)
6137(9.59%)124(8.99%)135(9.68%)122(9.08%)
93(0.21%)4(0.29%)3(0.22%)3(0.22%)
Total1429137913951343
Follow-up-baseline
−62(0.14%)0(0.00%)2(0.14%)0(0.00%)
−40(0.00%)2(0.15%)0(0.00%)2(0.15%)
−271(4.98%)62(4.52%)71(5.10%)60(4.49%)
0744(52.21%)708(51.60%)725(52.12%)692(51.80%)
2519(36.42%)504(36.73%)507(36.45%)492(36.83%)
478(5.47%)82(5.98%)76(5.46%)77(5.76%)
611(0.77%)14(1.02%)10(0.72%)13(0.97%)
Total1425137213911336
Signed-rank (P)93780(0.0000)91596(0.0000)89180.00(0.0000)86071.00(0.0000)
TABLE 28 — test of change of short breath in different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.640.52331.270.2025
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.520.59970.790.4302
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.190.84760.540.5878
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.430.66450.720.4720
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.430.6636−0.560.5756
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.490.62220.850.3931
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.150.87700.030.9791
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.040.96840.050.9635
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.420.67670.640.5230
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test−1.410.1587−1.810.0706
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.630.52581.000.3160
Follow-upRank-sum test0.570.56800.500.6158
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test0.780.43470.710.4756
TABLE 29 — change of fatigue in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0315(18.42%)323(19.12%)268(18.22%)254(17.90%)
21042(60.94%)1010(59.80%)890(60.50%)848(59.76%)
4289(16.90%)296(17.53%)261(17.74%)265(18.68%)
664(3.74%)60(3.55%)52(3.54%)52(3.66%)
Total1710168914711419
1 month after treatment
0413(24.05%)426(25.07%)346(23.62%)343(24.10%)
21043(60.75%)1011(59.51%)890(60.75%)847(59.52%)
4238(13.86%)234(13.77%)211(14.40%)210(14.76%)
623(1.34%)28(1.65%)18(1.23%)23(1.62%)
Total1717169914651423
1 month after treatment-baseline
−61(0.06%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
−411(0.64%)16(0.95%)9(0.62%)8(0.57%)
−298(5.73%)107(6.34%)87(5.96%)89(6.30%)
01238(72.40%)1162(68.88%)1054(72.24%)972(68.84%)
11(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
2303(17.72%)320(18.97%)260(17.82%)274(19.41%)
445(2.63%)70(4.15%)35(2.40%)59(4.18%)
613(0.76%)10(0.59%)12(0.82%)8(0.57%)
Total1710168714591412
Signed-rank (P)30817(0.0000)37573(0.0000)22149.00(0.0000)28265.00(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0480(27.96%)471(27.71%)409(28.28%)378(26.87%)
21026(59.76%)1018(59.88%)864(59.75%)849(60.34%)
4197(11.47%)195(11.47%)165(11.41%)168(11.94%)
614(0.82%)16(0.94%)8(0.55%)12(0.85%)
Total1717170014461407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−62(0.12%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)
−49(0.53%)14(0.83%)6(0.42%)8(0.57%)
−286(5.03%)105(6.22%)70(4.85%)86(6.16%)
01107(64.74%)1054(62.48%)923(63.96%)864(61.85%)
2420(24.56%)408(24.18%)368(25.50%)349(24.98%)
470(4.09%)92(5.45%)60(4.16%)80(5.73%)
616(0.94%)12(0.71%)14(0.97%)9(0.64%)
Total1710168714431397
Signed-rank (P)63149(0.0000)64162(0.0000)48511.00(0.0000)48043.00(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0520(30.27%)508(29.88%)443(31.00%)410(29.54%)
21048(61.00%)1053(61.94%)881(61.65%)874(62.97%)
4135(7.86%)126(7.41%)97(6.79%)95(6.84%)
615(0.87%)13(0.76%)8(0.56%)9(0.65%)
Total1718170014291388
6 months after treatment-baseline
−60(0.00%)4(0.24%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
−412(0.70%)9(0.53%)8(0.56%)3(0.22%)
−2108(6.32%)108(6.40%)86(6.03%)84(6.09%)
0974(56.96%)929(55.07%)791(55.47%)738(53.52%)
2488(28.54%)499(29.58%)428(30.01%)430(31.18%)
4110(6.43%)123(7.29%)97(6.80%)108(7.83%)
618(1.05%)15(0.89%)16(1.12%)13(0.94%)
Total1710168714261379
Signed-rank (P)95480(0.0000)101941(0.0000)74284.00(0.0000)77640.00(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0576(33.53%)581(34.18%)498(35.22%)473(34.78%)
21035(60.24%)1017(59.82%)857(60.61%)828(60.88%)
488(5.12%)92(5.41%)49(3.47%)53(3.90%)
619(1.11%)10(0.59%)10(0.71%)6(0.44%)
Total1718170014141360
9 months after treatment-baseline
−61(0.06%)3(0.18%)0(0.00%)2(0.15%)
−413(0.76%)8(0.47%)7(0.50%)3(0.22%)
−2115(6.73%)104(6.16%)92(6.52%)76(5.63%)
0864(50.53%)828(49.08%)679(48.12%)623(46.11%)
2572(33.45%)577(34.20%)503(35.65%)505(37.38%)
4125(7.31%)142(8.42%)112(7.94%)121(8.96%)
620(1.17%)25(1.48%)18(1.28%)21(1.55%)
Total1710168714111351
Signed-rank (P)128910(0.0000)140633(0.0000)102138.0(0.0000)107197.5(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0630(36.67%)650(38.24%)548(39.06%)537(39.78%)
21000(58.21%)968(56.94%)816(58.16%)775(57.41%)
476(4.42%)76(4.47%)37(2.64%)36(2.67%)
612(0.70%)6(0.35%)2(0.14%)2(0.15%)
Total1718170014031350
12 months after treatment-baseline
−411(0.64%)12(0.71%)4(0.29%)5(0.37%)
−60(0.00%)1(0.06%)
−2100(5.85%)101(5.99%)76(5.43%)70(5.22%)
0805(47.08%)747(44.28%)617(44.10%)540(40.24%)
2605(35.38%)630(37.34%)532(38.03%)558(41.58%)
4164(9.59%)168(9.96%)147(10.51%)144(10.73%)
625(1.46%)28(1.66%)23(1.64%)25(1.86%)
Total1710168713991342
Signed-rank (P)160960(0.0000)173385(0.0000)127198.5(0.0000)135471.5(0.0000)
Follow-up
0611(42.76%)590(42.82%)597(42.80%)570(42.47%)
2759(53.11%)733(53.19%)739(52.97%)721(53.73%)
456(3.92%)53(3.85%)56(4.01%)50(3.73%)
63(0.21%)2(0.15%)3(0.22%)1(0.07%)
Total1429137813951342
Follow-up-baseline
−45(0.35%)6(0.44%)3(0.22%)4(0.30%)
−287(6.11%)72(5.25%)86(6.18%)71(5.32%)
0608(42.67%)533(38.88%)598(42.99%)525(39.33%)
2537(37.68%)558(40.70%)523(37.60%)542(40.60%)
4158(11.09%)175(12.76%)153(11.00%)168(12.58%)
630(2.11%)27(1.97%)28(2.01%)25(1.87%)
Total1425137113911335
Signed-rank (P)136359(0.0000)148729(0.0000)129118.0(0.0000)139632.5(0.0000)
TABLE 30 — test of change of fatigue in different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.150.88150.590.5564
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test−0.380.70520.110.9118
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test1.130.26031.600.1090
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.190.85190.990.3202
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.040.96630.020.9855
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.020.98140.790.4323
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.910.36331.060.2910
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.460.64300.280.7833
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test1.580.11501.830.0676
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.980.3255−0.360.7217
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test1.210.22731.750.0802
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.070.94290.030.9763
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test2.340.01942.250.0243
TABLE 31 — change of palpitation in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0315(18.42%)281(16.66%)263(17.88%)224(15.81%)
2803(46.96%)780(46.24%)690(46.91%)644(45.45%)
4470(27.49%)508(30.11%)416(28.28%)445(31.40%)
6122(7.13%)118(6.99%)102(6.93%)104(7.34%)
Total1710168714711417
1 month after treatment
0427(24.87%)393(23.13%)353(24.11%)319(22.42%)
11(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
2834(48.57%)859(50.56%)713(48.70%)714(50.18%)
4398(23.18%)386(22.72%)351(23.98%)338(23.75%)
657(3.32%)61(3.59%)46(3.14%)52(3.65%)
Total1717169914641423
1 month after treatment-baseline
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−21(0.06%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
−1103(6.02%)98(5.80%)87(5.96%)75(5.30%)
01242(72.63%)1278(75.67%)1051(71.99%)1075(76.03%)
1334(19.53%)277(16.40%)295(20.21%)234(16.55%)
225(1.46%)29(1.72%)22(1.51%)26(1.84%)
35(0.29%)3(0.18%)4(0.27%)2(0.14%)
Total1710168914601414
Signed-rank (P)31866(0.0000)22309(0.0000)24868.00(0.0000)16529.00(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0480(27.96%)438(25.76%)403(27.87%)350(24.88%)
2894(52.07%)898(52.82%)759(52.49%)748(53.16%)
4310(18.05%)320(18.82%)261(18.05%)275(19.55%)
633(1.92%)44(2.59%)23(1.59%)34(2.42%)
Total1717170014461407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−30(0.00%)3(0.18%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
−22(0.12%)4(0.24%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
−1119(6.96%)94(5.57%)99(6.86%)72(5.15%)
01125(65.79%)1125(66.61%)943(65.35%)923(65.98%)
1415(24.27%)412(24.39%)356(24.67%)358(25.59%)
243(2.51%)45(2.66%)39(2.70%)38(2.72%)
36(0.35%)6(0.36%)5(0.35%)5(0.36%)
Total1710168914431399
Signed-rank (P)52756(0.0000)52032(0.0000)39577.50(0.0000)39872.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0538(31.32%)492(28.94%)456(31.91%)396(28.53%)
2906(52.74%)945(55.59%)764(53.46%)786(56.63%)
4246(14.32%)229(13.47%)192(13.44%)185(13.33%)
628(1.63%)34(2.00%)17(1.19%)21(1.51%)
Total1718170014291388
6 months after treatment-baseline
−25(0.29%)8(0.47%)4(0.28%)3(0.22%)
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)
−1116(6.78%)102(6.04%)88(6.18%)74(5.36%)
01034(60.47%)1022(60.51%)842(59.09%)827(59.88%)
1490(28.65%)495(29.31%)431(30.25%)425(30.77%)
256(3.27%)52(3.08%)53(3.72%)45(3.26%)
39(0.53%)8(0.47%)7(0.49%)7(0.51%)
Total1710168914251381
Signed-rank (P)76022(0.0000)74546(0.0000)60046.00(0.0000)56797.00(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0581(33.82%)570(33.53%)496(35.05%)464(34.14%)
2929(54.07%)939(55.24%)782(55.27%)768(56.51%)
4179(10.42%)164(9.65%)122(8.62%)113(8.31%)
629(1.69%)27(1.59%)15(1.06%)14(1.03%)
Total1718170014151359
9 months after treatment-baseline
−25(0.29%)12(0.71%)4(0.28%)4(0.30%)
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)
−1117(6.84%)105(6.22%)87(6.17%)74(5.47%)
0948(55.44%)906(53.64%)749(53.12%)699(51.62%)
1557(32.57%)601(35.58%)493(34.96%)524(38.70%)
276(4.44%)53(3.14%)71(5.04%)46(3.40%)
37(0.41%)10(0.59%)6(0.43%)7(0.52%)
Total1710168914101354
Signed-rank (P)102289(0.0000)105928(0.0000)81650.00(0.0000)82763.00(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0669(38.94%)638(37.53%)576(41.05%)529(39.19%)
2892(51.92%)911(53.59%)745(53.10%)738(54.67%)
4138(8.03%)131(7.71%)78(5.56%)76(5.63%)
619(1.11%)20(1.18%)4(0.29%)7(0.52%)
1718170014031350
12 months after treatment-baseline
−24(0.23%)10(0.59%)3(0.21%)1(0.07%)
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)
−1112(6.55%)106(6.28%)78(5.58%)74(5.51%)
0882(51.58%)861(50.98%)679(48.53%)655(48.81%)
1602(35.20%)620(36.71%)536(38.31%)533(39.72%)
2102(5.96%)84(4.97%)97(6.93%)75(5.59%)
38(0.47%)6(0.36%)6(0.43%)4(0.30%)
Total1710168913991342
Signed-rank (P)128493(0.0000)123688(0.0000)103801.5(0.0000)95022.50(0.0000)
Follow-up
0631(44.16%)591(42.86%)613(43.94%)570(42.44%)
2697(48.78%)704(51.05%)683(48.96%)692(51.53%)
495(6.65%)76(5.51%)94(6.74%)74(5.51%)
66(0.42%)8(0.58%)5(0.36%)7(0.52%)
Total1429137913951343
Follow-up-baseline
−31(0.07%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
−23(0.21%)1(0.07%)3(0.22%)1(0.07%)
−190(6.32%)96(7.00%)86(6.19%)93(6.96%)
0690(48.46%)651(47.45%)677(48.71%)634(47.46%)
1528(37.08%)539(39.29%)516(37.12%)523(39.15%)
297(6.81%)73(5.32%)93(6.69%)73(5.46%)
315(1.05%)12(0.87%)14(1.01%)12(0.90%)
Total1424137213901336
Sign-rank (P)104286(0.0000)98940(0.0000)98684.00(0.0000)94032.50(0.0000)
TABLE 32 — test of change of palpitation in different observations
FASPP
Itemstest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test1.600.10952.060.0390
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test0.680.49600.820.4149
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−1.780.0743−1.630.1028
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test1.610.10802.140.0325
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.650.51791.090.2752
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.970.32971.580.1146
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.320.74660.260.7913
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.180.85590.310.7557
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.720.47300.870.3820
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.640.51981.000.3150
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.150.8821−0.310.7560
Follow-upRank-sum test0.350.72700.410.6795
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test−0.270.7903−0.150.8833
TABLE 33 — change of spontaneous perspiration in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0430(25.15%)409(24.22%)367(24.95%)333(23.47%)
1941(55.03%)962(56.96%)803(54.59%)808(56.94%)
2298(17.43%)284(16.81%)265(18.01%)246(17.34%)
341(2.40%)34(2.01%)36(2.45%)32(2.26%)
Total1710168914711419
1 month after treatment
0603(35.12%)541(31.84%)518(35.36%)449(31.55%)
1879(51.19%)933(54.91%)738(50.38%)777(54.60%)
2215(12.52%)206(12.12%)195(13.31%)182(12.79%)
320(1.16%)19(1.12%)14(0.96%)15(1.05%)
Total1717169914651423
1 month after treatment-baseline
−33(0.18%)5(0.30%)3(0.21%)5(0.35%)
−217(0.99%)8(0.47%)14(0.96%)7(0.50%)
−194(5.50%)108(6.39%)77(5.27%)82(5.80%)
01249(73.08%)1227(72.65%)1068(73.15%)1041(73.62%)
1279(16.33%)276(16.34%)238(16.30%)228(16.12%)
251(2.98%)59(3.49%)48(3.29%)47(3.32%)
316(0.94%)6(0.36%)12(0.82%)4(0.28%)
Total1709168914601414
Signed-rank (P)27157(0.0000)27058(0.0000)20342.00(0.0000)17917.00(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0667(38.85%)664(39.06%)563(38.93%)550(39.09%)
1846(49.27%)853(50.18%)709(49.03%)710(50.46%)
2190(11.07%)172(10.12%)167(11.55%)140(9.95%)
314(0.82%)11(0.65%)7(0.48%)7(0.50%)
Total1717170014461407
3 months after treatment-baseline
−32(0.12%)2(0.12%)2(0.14%)2(0.14%)
−215(0.88%)9(0.53%)13(0.90%)6(0.43%)
−1121(7.08%)124(7.34%)101(7.00%)100(7.15%)
01083(63.37%)1068(63.23%)898(62.23%)877(62.73%)
1392(22.94%)393(23.27%)342(23.70%)334(23.89%)
276(4.45%)86(5.09%)71(4.92%)74(5.29%)
320(1.17%)7(0.41%)16(1.11%)5(0.36%)
Total1709168914431398
Signed-rank (P)57413(0.0000)58131(0.0000)44586.00(0.0000)42357.50(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
0728(42.37%)714(42.00%)628(43.98%)593(42.72%)
1833(48.49%)842(49.53%)676(47.34%)688(49.57%)
2144(8.38%)136(8.00%)117(8.19%)103(7.42%)
313(0.76%)8(0.47%)7(0.49%)4(0.29%)
Total1718170014281388
6 months after treatment-baseline
−30(0.00%)3(0.18%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
−223(1.35%)14(0.83%)20(1.40%)9(0.65%)
−1137(8.02%)120(7.10%)105(7.37%)89(6.45%)
0959(56.11%)973(57.61%)774(54.32%)785(56.88%)
1468(27.38%)455(26.94%)414(29.05%)387(28.04%)
293(5.44%)112(6.63%)88(6.18%)96(6.96%)
329(1.70%)12(0.71%)24(1.68%)11(0.80%)
Total1709168914251380
Signed-rank (P)84041(0.0000)82717(0.0000)67343.00(0.0000)60902.00(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0788(45.87%)776(45.65%)678(47.95%)647(47.57%)
1813(47.32%)818(48.12%)652(46.11%)650(47.79%)
2105(6.11%)100(5.88%)79(5.59%)61(4.49%)
312(0.70%)6(0.35%)5(0.35%)2(0.15%)
Total1718170014141360
9 months after treatment-baseline
−30(0.00%)3(0.18%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
−210(0.59%)15(0.89%)6(0.43%)8(0.59%)
−1154(9.01%)110(6.51%)122(8.65%)80(5.92%)
0910(53.25%)910(53.88%)717(50.85%)711(52.63%)
1491(28.73%)508(30.08%)434(30.78%)426(31.53%)
2113(6.61%)130(7.70%)105(7.45%)112(8.29%)
331(1.81%)13(0.77%)26(1.84%)11(0.81%)
Total1709168914101351
Signed-rank (P)102988(0.0000)105181(0.0000)82586.50(0.0000)75847.50(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
0845(49.19%)814(47.88%)730(52.03%)673(49.93%)
1804(46.80%)813(47.82%)640(45.62%)646(47.92%)
258(3.38%)68(4.00%)31(2.21%)28(2.08%)
311(0.64%)5(0.29%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)
Total1718170014031348
12 months after treatment-baseline
−212(0.70%)9(0.53%)8(0.57%)2(0.15%)
−30(0.00%)2(0.12%)
−1137(8.02%)116(6.87%)103(7.37%)81(6.03%)
0837(48.98%)844(49.97%)647(46.28%)646(48.10%)
1550(32.18%)546(32.33%)483(34.55%)463(34.48%)
2139(8.13%)153(9.06%)128(9.16%)136(10.13%)
334(1.99%)19(1.12%)29(2.07%)15(1.12%)
Total1709168913981343
Signed-rank (P)134030(0.0000)131902(0.0000)105721.5(0.0000)98327.00(0.0000)
Follow-up
0767(53.71%)719(52.18%)750(53.80%)699(52.09%)
1595(41.67%)601(43.61%)578(41.46%)587(43.74%)
262(4.34%)58(4.21%)62(4.45%)56(4.17%)
34(0.28%)0(0.00%)4(0.29%)0(0.00%)
Total1428137813941342
Follow-up-baseline
−32(0.14%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)
−28(0.56%)5(0.36%)8(0.58%)5(0.37%)
−1119(8.36%)92(6.71%)116(8.35%)91(6.81%)
0656(46.07%)649(47.30%)644(46.33%)631(47.23%)
1466(32.72%)464(33.82%)451(32.45%)452(33.83%)
2141(9.90%)143(10.42%)138(9.93%)140(10.48%)
332(2.25%)18(1.31%)31(2.23%)16(1.20%)
Total1424137213901336
Signed-rank (P)105998(0.0000)101375(0.0000)99787.50(0.0000)95903.50(0.0000)
TABLE 34 — test of change of spontaneous perspiration in different observations
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.030.97650.260.7929
1 month after treatmentRank-sum test1.430.15361.550.1213
1 month after treatment-baselineRank-sum test−0.290.7709−0.520.6002
3 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.490.6219−0.560.5750
3 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.120.9053−0.030.9741
6 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.040.97060.300.7638
6 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.350.7234−0.050.9606
9 months after treatmentRank-sum test−0.070.9432−0.170.8632
9 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test1.270.20530.820.4096
12 months after treatmentRank-sum test0.790.43021.020.3094
12 months after treatment-baselineRank-sum test0.430.66420.410.6850
Follow-upRank-sum test0.660.51110.700.4831
Follow-up-baselineRank-sum test0.650.51700.680.4968
TABLE 35 — change of pale complexion in different observations
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
0572(33.47%)552(32.68%)494(33.61%)450(31.71%)
1741(43.36%)731(43.28%)626(42.59%)623(43.90%)
2325(19.02%)345(20.43%)293(19.93%)300(21.14%)
371(4.15%)61(3.61%)57(3.88%)46(3.24%)
Total1709168914701419
1 month after treatment
0713(41.53%)695(40.91%)613(41.81%)569(39.99%)
1726(42.28%)705(41.49%)615(41.95%)597(41.95%)
2245(14.27%)269(15.83%)211(14.39%)231(16.23%)
333(1.92%)30(1.77%)27(1.84%)26(1.83%)
Total1717169914661423
1 month after treatment-baseline
−165(3.81%)50(2.97%)52(3.57%)43(3.05%)
01477(86.48%)1444(85.70%)1275(87.45%)1199(85.16%)
1166(9.72%)191(11.34%)131(8.98%)166(11.79%)
Total1708168514581408
Signed-rank (P)5858.0(0.0000)8530.5(0.0000)3634.00(0.0000)6457.50(0.0000)
3 months after treatment
0809(47.12%)776(45.65%)693(47.89%)637(45.31%)
1677(39.43%)697(41.00%)566(39.12%)586(41.68%)
2210(12.23%)206(12.12%)172(11.89%)168(11.95%)
321(1.22%)21(1.24%)16(1.11%)15(1.07%)
Total1717170014471406
3 months after treatment-baseline
−162(3.63%)60(3.56%)47(3.26%)46(3.30%)
01387(81.21%)1340(79.53%)1177(81.68%)1099(78.84%)
1259(15.16%)285(16.91%)217(15.06%)249(17.86%)
Total1708168514411394
Signed-rank (P)15859(0.0000)19463(0.0000)11262.50(0.0000)15022.00(0.0000)
6 months after treatment
1 month after treatment
0871(50.70%)863(50.76%)750(52.48%)708(51.05%)
1657(38.24%)645(37.94%)540(37.79%)536(38.64%)
2179(10.42%)170(10.00%)133(9.31%)130(9.37%)
311(0.64%)22(1.29%)6(0.42%)13(0.94%)
Total1718170014291387
6 months after treatment-baseline
−167(3.92%)57(3.38%)49(3.44%)37(2.69%)
01322(77.40%)1268(75.25%)1104(77.47%)1024(74.42%)
1319(18.68%)360(21.36%)272(19.09%)315(22.89%)
Total1708168514251376
Signed-rank (P)24381(0.0000)31664(0.0000)17951.50(0.0000)24533.50(0.0000)
9 months after treatment
0912(53.08%)913(53.71%)788(55.69%)743(54.75%)
1653(38.01%)639(37.59%)520(36.75%)515(37.95%)
2142(8.27%)133(7.82%)101(7.14%)93(6.85%)
311(0.64%)15(0.88%)6(0.42%)6(0.44%)
Total1718170014151357
9 months after treatment-baseline
−159(3.45%)54(3.20%)40(2.85%)29(2.15%)
01284(75.18%)1210(71.81%)1049(74.66%)949(70.35%)
1365(21.37%)421(24.99%)316(22.49%)371(27.50%)
Total1708168514051349
Signed-rank (P)32513(0.0000)43673(0.0000)24633.00(0.0000)34285.50(0.0000)
12 months after treatment
01011(58.85%)978(57.53%)870(62.01%)806(59.75%)
1590(34.34%)617(36.29%)463(33.00%)489(36.25%)
2104(6.05%)94(5.53%)63(4.49%)53(3.93%)
313(0.76%)11(0.65%)7(0.50%)1(0.07%)
Total1718170014031349
12 months after treatment-baseline
−156(3.28%)55(3.26%)37(2.65%)27(2.02%)
01202(70.37%)1155(68.55%)967(69.22%)891(66.54%)
1450(26.35%)475(28.19%)393(28.13%)421(31.44%)
Total1708168513971339
Signed-rank (P)49940(0.0000)55755(0.0000)38359.00(0.0000)44226.50(0.0000)
Follow-up
0882(61.72%)826(59.94%)862(61.79%)802(59.76%)
1465(32.54%)487(35.34%)452(32.40%)475(35.39%)
276(5.32%)61(4.43%)75(5.38%)61(4.55%)
36(0.42%)4(0.29%)6(0.43%)4(0.30%)
Total1429137813951342
Follow-up-baseline
−139(2.75%)30(2.19%)39(2.82%)30(2.25%)
0950(66.95%)914(66.76%)932(67.29%)892(66.92%)
1430(30.30%)425(31.04%)414(29.89%)411(30.83%)
Total1419136913851333
Signed-rank (P)45943(0.0000)45030(0.0000)42562.50(0.0000)42100.50(0.0000)
TABLE 37 — different observations (Question 1-1)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited1(0.06%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)3(0.21%)
Moderately limited16(0.92%)18(1.05%)13(0.87%)14(0.97%)
Mildly limited34(1.95%)41(2.39%)30(2.01%)32(2.21%)
Slightly limited102(5.86%)104(6.05%)87(5.82%)88(6.09%)
Not limited1582(90.92%)1547(90.05%)1359(90.96%)1305(90.31%)
Other reasons5(0.29%)5(0.29%)4(0.27%)3(0.21%)
Total1740171814941445
1 month after treatment
Severely limited2(0.11%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited11(0.63%)11(0.64%)9(0.60%)8(0.55%)
Mildly limited24(1.38%)36(2.09%)21(1.41%)26(1.80%)
Slightly limited95(5.45%)89(5.16%)80(5.38%)73(5.06%)
Not limited1607(92.20%)1584(91.83%)1375(92.41%)1333(92.31%)
Other reasons4(0.23%)5(0.29%)2(0.13%)4(0.28%)
Total1743172514881444
3 months after treatment
Severely limited1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited7(0.40%)8(0.46%)6(0.41%)4(0.28%)
Mildly limited26(1.49%)36(2.09%)22(1.50%)26(1.82%)
Slightly limited72(4.13%)70(4.06%)58(3.95%)56(3.92%)
Not limited1634(93.69%)1609(93.28%)1381(93.95%)1343(93.92%)
Other reasons4(0.23%)2(0.12%)3(0.20%)1(0.07%)
Total1744172514701430
6 months after treatment
Severely limited1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited4(0.23%)7(0.41%)4(0.28%)3(0.21%)
Mildly limited29(1.66%)23(1.33%)22(1.52%)14(1.00%)
Slightly limited69(3.96%)77(4.46%)53(3.66%)58(4.13%)
Not limited1638(93.92%)1613(93.51%)1368(94.34%)1325(94.37%)
Other reasons3(0.17%)5(0.29%)3(0.21%)4(0.28%)
Total1744172514501404
9 months after treatment
Severely limited1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited5(0.29%)9(0.52%)3(0.21%)5(0.36%)
Mildly limited25(1.43%)21(1.22%)18(1.25%)11(0.80%)
Slightly limited67(3.84%)71(4.12%)47(3.27%)49(3.55%)
Not limited1643(94.21%)1618(93.80%)1366(95.06%)1309(94.92%)
Other reasons3(0.17%)6(0.35%)3(0.21%)5(0.36%)
Total1744172514371379
12 months after treatment
Severely limited1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited4(0.23%)7(0.41%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Mildly limited15(0.86%)16(0.93%)7(0.49%)6(0.44%)
Slightly limited61(3.50%)68(3.94%)41(2.88%)44(3.22%)
Not limited1659(95.13%)1630(94.49%)1371(96.28%)1312(96.12%)
Other reasons4(0.23%)4(0.23%)4(0.28%)2(0.15%)
Total1744172514241365
Follow-up
Severely limited1(0.07%)3(0.22%)1(0.07%)3(0.22%)
Moderately limited1(0.07%)2(0.14%)1(0.07%)2(0.15%)
Mildly limited6(0.42%)6(0.43%)6(0.43%)6(0.44%)
Slightly limited45(3.12%)45(3.23%)44(3.12%)45(3.32%)
Not limited1386(95.98%)1334(95.83%)1352(95.95%)1298(95.72%)
Other reasons5(0.35%)2(0.14%)5(0.35%)2(0.15%)
Total1444139214091356
TABLE 38 — test of different observations (Question 1-1)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.900.3683−0.730.4642
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.310.75640.170.8666
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.790.4318−0.330.7400
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.210.83670.240.8087
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.080.93470.210.8305
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.830.4038−0.580.5613
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.740.4565−0.850.3960
TABLE 39 — different observations (Question 1-2)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited2(0.11%)3(0.17%)2(0.13%)3(0.21%)
Moderately limited18(1.03%)17(0.99%)13(0.87%)14(0.97%)
Mildly limited46(2.64%)54(3.14%)42(2.81%)41(2.84%)
Slightly limited129(7.41%)136(7.92%)113(7.56%)114(7.89%)
Not limited1539(88.45%)1505(87.60%)1319(88.29%)1271(87.96%)
Other reasons6(0.34%)3(0.17%)5(0.33%)2(0.14%)
Total1740171814941445
1 month after treatment
Severely limited0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited14(0.80%)11(0.64%)10(0.67%)9(0.62%)
Mildly limited32(1.84%)42(2.44%)30(2.02%)31(2.15%)
Slightly limited116(6.66%)124(7.19%)99(6.65%)103(7.13%)
Not limited1575(90.36%)1544(89.56%)1345(90.39%)1299(89.96%)
Other reasons6(0.34%)3(0.17%)4(0.27%)2(0.14%)
Total1743172414881444
3 months after treatment
Severely limited0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited10(0.57%)8(0.46%)8(0.54%)4(0.28%)
Mildly limited23(1.32%)43(2.49%)19(1.29%)31(2.17%)
Slightly limited101(5.79%)95(5.51%)84(5.71%)78(5.45%)
Not limited1603(91.92%)1575(91.30%)1353(92.04%)1315(91.96%)
Other reasons7(0.40%)4(0.23%)6(0.41%)2(0.14%)
Total1744172514701430
6 months after treatment
Severely limited1(0.06%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited8(0.46%)8(0.46%)6(0.41%)4(0.28%)
Mildly limited27(1.55%)32(1.86%)19(1.31%)19(1.35%)
Slightly limited87(4.99%)93(5.39%)66(4.55%)73(5.20%)
Not limited1615(92.60%)1586(91.94%)1352(93.24%)1304(92.88%)
Other reasons6(0.34%)6(0.35%)6(0.41%)4(0.28%)
Total1744172514501404
9 months after treatment
Severely limited0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited7(0.40%)10(0.58%)4(0.28%)5(0.36%)
Mildly limited29(1.66%)27(1.57%)20(1.39%)13(0.94%)
Slightly limited72(4.13%)79(4.58%)50(3.48%)54(3.92%)
Not limited1631(93.52%)1602(92.87%)1358(94.50%)1301(94.34%)
Other reasons5(0.29%)7(0.41%)5(0.35%)6(0.44%)
Total1744172514371379
12 months after treatment
Severely limited0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited6(0.34%)8(0.46%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Mildly limited18(1.03%)23(1.33%)8(0.56%)9(0.66%)
Slightly limited67(3.84%)79(4.58%)45(3.16%)52(3.81%)
Not limited1647(94.44%)1610(93.33%)1365(95.79%)1300(95.24%)
Other reasons6(0.34%)5(0.29%)6(0.42%)3(0.22%)
Total1744172514251365
Follow-up
Severely limited2(0.14%)3(0.22%)2(0.14%)3(0.22%)
Moderately limited0(0.00%)3(0.22%)0(0.00%)3(0.22%)
Mildly limited8(0.55%)4(0.29%)8(0.57%)4(0.29%)
Slightly limited57(3.95%)52(3.74%)56(3.97%)51(3.76%)
Not limited1370(94.88%)1326(95.26%)1336(94.82%)1291(95.21%)
Not limited7(0.48%)4(0.29%)7(0.50%)4(0.29%)
Total1444139214091356
TABLE 40 — test of different observations (Question 1-2)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−1.070.2868−0.590.5561
1 month afterRank-sum test−1.110.2687−0.610.5434
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−1.050.2923−0.620.5328
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.720.4716−0.620.5356
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.490.62680.030.9734
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−1.490.1363−1.200.2294
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.010.9927−0.010.9885
TABLE 41 — different observations (Question 1-3)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited15(0.86%)13(0.76%)12(0.80%)11(0.76%)
Moderately limited53(3.05%)45(2.63%)44(2.95%)36(2.49%)
Mildly limited149(8.57%)163(9.52%)135(9.04%)144(9.98%)
Slightly limited340(19.56%)348(20.32%)307(20.56%)305(21.14%)
Not limited1170(67.32%)1135(66.26%)985(65.97%)941(65.21%)
Other reasons11(0.63%)9(0.53%)10(0.67%)6(0.42%)
Total1738171314931443
1 month after treatment
Severely limited5(0.29%)5(0.29%)5(0.34%)4(0.28%)
Moderately limited34(1.95%)34(1.97%)25(1.68%)27(1.87%)
Mildly limited126(7.23%)139(8.06%)114(7.67%)123(8.52%)
Slightly limited307(17.62%)306(17.75%)271(18.24%)265(18.36%)
Not limited1261(72.39%)1233(71.52%)1064(71.60%)1018(70.55%)
Other reasons9(0.52%)7(0.41%)7(0.47%)6(0.42%)
Total1742172414861443
3 months after treatment
Severely limited5(0.29%)4(0.23%)5(0.34%)2(0.14%)
Moderately limited23(1.32%)28(1.62%)16(1.09%)19(1.33%)
Mildly limited93(5.33%)111(6.44%)81(5.51%)91(6.36%)
Slightly limited296(16.97%)305(17.69%)257(17.48%)265(18.53%)
Not limited1318(75.57%)1268(73.55%)1103(75.03%)1048(73.29%)
Other reason9(0.52%)8(0.46%)8(0.54%)5(0.35%)
Total1744172414701430
6 months after treatment
Severely limited4(0.23%)3(0.17%)4(0.28%)2(0.14%)
Moderately limited20(1.15%)25(1.45%)14(0.97%)12(0.85%)
Mildly limited86(4.93%)92(5.34%)65(4.48%)75(5.34%)
Slightly limited265(15.19%)289(16.76%)227(15.66%)242(17.24%)
Not limited1358(77.87%)1307(75.81%)1131(78.00%)1067(76.00%)
Other reasons11(0.63%)8(0.46%)9(0.62%)6(0.43%)
Total1744172414501404
9 months after treatment
Severely limited2(0.11%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Moderately limited17(0.97%)21(1.22%)10(0.70%)8(0.58%)
Mildly limited58(3.33%)70(4.06%)37(2.57%)51(3.70%)
Slightly limited238(13.65%)272(15.78%)196(13.64%)218(15.83%)
Not limited1421(81.48%)1350(78.31%)1187(82.60%)1092(79.30%)
Other reasons8(0.46%)9(0.52%)6(0.42%)7(0.51%)
Total1744172414371377
12 months after treatment
Severely limited2(0.11%)1(0.06%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Moderately limited11(0.63%)20(1.16%)3(0.21%)5(0.37%)
Mildly limited54(3.10%)46(2.67%)30(2.11%)26(1.90%)
Slightly limited196(11.24%)222(12.88%)157(11.03%)169(12.38%)
Not limited1471(84.35%)1428(82.83%)1225(86.03%)1161(85.05%)
Other reasons10(0.57%)7(0.41%)8(0.56%)4(0.29%)
Total1744172414241365
Follow-up
Severely limited2(0.14%)3(0.22%)2(0.14%)3(0.22%)
Moderately limited6(0.42%)6(0.43%)6(0.43%)6(0.44%)
Mildly limited30(2.08%)16(1.15%)30(2.13%)16(1.18%)
Slightly limited190(13.17%)205(14.73%)182(12.93%)198(14.60%)
Not limited1206(83.58%)1157(83.12%)1179(83.74%)1128(83.19%)
Other reasons9(0.62%)5(0.36%)9(0.64%)5(0.37%)
Total1443139214081356
TABLE 42 — test of different observations (Question 1-3)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.700.4863−0.620.5323
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.760.4470−0.770.4437
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−1.530.1271−1.310.1906
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−1.620.1045−1.460.1441
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−2.250.0242−2.140.0327
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−1.410.1597−1.070.2868
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.570.5701−0.630.5275
TABLE 43 — different observations (Question 1-4)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited59(3.41%)64(3.73%)51(3.43%)56(3.88%)
Moderately limited208(12.01%)206(12.02%)185(12.42%)180(12.48%)
Mildly limited402(23.21%)384(22.40%)347(23.30%)338(23.44%)
Slightly limited554(31.99%)559(32.61%)478(32.10%)470(32.59%)
Not limited495(28.58%)485(28.30%)414(27.80%)384(26.63%)
Other reasons14(0.81%)16(0.93%)14(0.94%)14(0.97%)
Total1732171414891442
1 month after treatment
Severely limited35(2.01%)34(1.97%)27(1.82%)30(2.08%)
Moderately limited159(9.13%)150(8.71%)138(9.31%)129(8.95%)
Mildly limited349(20.05%)332(19.27%)303(20.43%)281(19.50%)
Slightly limited568(32.62%)608(35.29%)483(32.57%)514(35.67%)
Not limited618(35.50%)587(34.07%)521(35.13%)476(33.03%)
Other reasons12(0.69%)12(0.70%)11(0.74%)11(0.76%)
Total1741172314831441
3 months after treatment
Severely limited29(1.66%)29(1.68%)22(1.50%)23(1.61%)
Moderately limited120(6.88%)120(6.96%)105(7.16%)97(6.79%)
Mildly limited325(18.65%)309(17.91%)278(18.95%)264(18.47%)
Slightly limited589(33.79%)604(35.01%)492(33.54%)513(35.90%)
Not limited668(38.32%)652(37.80%)559(38.10%)523(36.60%)
Other limited12(0.69%)11(0.64%)11(0.75%)9(0.63%)
Total1743172514671429
6 months after treatment
Severely limited29(1.66%)26(1.51%)20(1.38%)18(1.28%)
Moderately limited97(5.56%)104(6.03%)74(5.11%)75(5.34%)
Mildly limited314(18.00%)278(16.12%)266(18.37%)223(15.88%)
Slightly limited560(32.11%)598(34.67%)463(31.98%)513(36.54%)
Not limited731(41.92%)713(41.33%)613(42.33%)570(40.60%)
Other reasons13(0.75%)6(0.35%)12(0.83%)5(0.36%)
Total1744172514481404
9 months after treatment
Severely limited19(1.09%)22(1.28%)9(0.63%)12(0.87%)
Moderately limited85(4.87%)80(4.64%)63(4.39%)50(3.63%)
Mildly limited264(15.14%)255(14.78%)208(14.49%)194(14.08%)
Slightly limited569(32.63%)581(33.68%)472(32.89%)489(35.49%)
Not limited797(45.70%)774(44.87%)673(46.90%)622(45.14%)
Other reasons10(0.57%)13(0.75%)10(0.70%)11(0.80%)
Total1744172514351378
12 months after treatment
Severely limited13(0.75%)17(0.99%)2(0.14%)7(0.51%)
Moderately limited66(3.78%)73(4.23%)41(2.88%)41(3.01%)
Mildly limited236(13.53%)224(12.99%)177(12.43%)164(12.02%)
Slightly limited565(32.40%)570(33.04%)469(32.94%)476(34.90%)
Not limited853(48.91%)831(48.17%)724(50.84%)669(49.05%)
Other reasons11(0.63%)10(0.58%)11(0.77%)7(0.51%)
Total1744172514241364
Follow-up
Severely limited5(0.35%)6(0.43%)5(0.36%)6(0.44%)
Moderately limited38(2.64%)30(2.16%)37(2.63%)30(2.22%)
Mildly limited177(12.28%)176(12.67%)172(12.23%)173(12.79%)
Slightly limited436(30.26%)448(32.25%)428(30.44%)439(32.45%)
Not limited775(53.78%)720(51.84%)754(53.63%)696(51.44%)
Other reasons10(0.69%)9(0.65%)10(0.71%)9(0.67%)
Total1441138914061353
TABLE 44 — test of different observations (Question 1-4)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.020.9870−0.630.5294
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.090.9267−0.420.6741
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.070.9470−0.380.7062
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.090.9282−0.340.7364
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.130.8985−0.370.7113
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.480.6338−0.990.3205
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.830.4039−0.980.3274
TABLE 45 — different observations (Question 1-5)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited53(3.05%)54(3.16%)46(3.09%)46(3.19%)
Moderately limited238(13.72%)238(13.91%)210(14.08%)213(14.78%)
Mildly limited357(20.58%)369(21.57%)309(20.72%)315(21.86%)
Slightly limited507(29.22%)489(28.58%)441(29.58%)421(29.22%)
Not limited567(32.68%)543(31.74%)473(31.72%)431(29.91%)
Other reasons13(0.75%)18(1.05%)12(0.80%)15(1.04%)
Total1735171114911441
1 month after treatment
Severely limited32(1.84%)30(1.74%)24(1.62%)26(1.80%)
Moderately limited196(11.26%)182(10.57%)166(11.20%)161(11.17%)
Mildly limited315(18.09%)324(18.82%)278(18.76%)273(18.93%)
Slightly limited540(31.02%)530(30.78%)459(30.97%)449(31.14%)
Not limited648(37.22%)644(37.40%)546(36.84%)524(36.34%)
Other reasons10(0.57%)12(0.70%)9(0.61%)9(0.62%)
Total1741172214821442
3 months after treatment
Severely limited21(1.20%)27(1.57%)16(1.09%)19(1.33%)
Moderately limited162(9.29%)159(9.22%)137(9.34%)136(9.52%)
Mildly limited311(17.84%)288(16.71%)268(18.27%)241(16.86%)
Slightly limited528(30.29%)556(32.25%)441(30.06%)473(33.10%)
Not limited709(40.68%)683(39.62%)594(40.49%)553(38.70%)
Other reasons12(0.69%)11(0.64%)11(0.75%)7(0.49%)
Total1743172414671429
6 months after treatment
Severely limited20(1.15%)21(1.22%)12(0.83%)11(0.78%)
Moderately limited137(7.86%)131(7.59%)109(7.53%)104(7.42%)
Mildly limited292(16.75%)286(16.58%)244(16.86%)231(16.48%)
Slightly limited526(30.18%)539(31.25%)433(29.92%)453(32.31%)
Not limited755(43.32%)740(42.90%)637(44.02%)598(42.65%)
Other reasons13(0.75%)8(0.46%)12(0.83%)5(0.36%)
Total1743172514471402
9 months after treatment
Severely limited17(0.98%)17(0.99%)9(0.63%)6(0.44%)
Moderately limited103(5.91%)105(6.09%)77(5.37%)73(5.30%)
Mildly limited284(16.29%)293(16.99%)226(15.75%)235(17.05%)
Slightly limited503(28.86%)493(28.58%)408(28.43%)400(29.03%)
Not limited825(47.33%)805(46.67%)705(49.13%)656(47.61%)
Other reasons11(0.63%)12(0.70%)10(0.70%)8(0.58%)
Total1743172514351378
12 months after treatment
Severely limited13(0.75%)17(0.99%)3(0.21%)6(0.44%)
Moderately limited79(4.53%)82(4.75%)52(3.66%)49(3.60%)
Mildly limited260(14.92%)260(15.07%)198(13.93%)205(15.04%)
Slightly limited517(29.66%)511(29.62%)422(29.70%)411(30.15%)
Not limited863(49.51%)843(48.87%)736(51.79%)685(50.26%)
Other reasons11(0.63%)12(0.70%)10(0.70%)7(0.51%)
Total1743172514211363
Follow-up
Severely limited9(0.62%)6(0.43%)9(0.64%)6(0.44%)
Moderately limited57(3.96%)62(4.47%)57(4.05%)61(4.51%)
Mildly limited189(13.12%)199(14.34%)181(12.87%)195(14.42%)
Slightly limited395(27.41%)397(28.60%)386(27.45%)389(28.77%)
Not limited783(54.34%)717(51.66%)765(54.41%)694(51.33%)
Other reasons8(0.56%)7(0.50%)8(0.57%)7(0.52%)
Total1441138814061352
TABLE 46 — test of different observations (Question 1-5)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.550.5790−1.050.2935
1 month afterRank-sum test0.280.7792−0.270.7871
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.280.7809−0.600.5495
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.230.8186−0.630.5305
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.470.6353−0.850.3927
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.440.6574−1.050.2944
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−1.480.1377−1.680.0935
TABLE 47 — different observations (Question 1-6)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited117(6.75%)105(6.14%)104(6.99%)95(6.61%)
Moderately limited311(17.95%)334(19.53%)274(18.43%)298(20.72%)
Mildly limited362(20.89%)347(20.29%)306(20.58%)284(19.75%)
Slightly limited479(27.64%)493(28.83%)416(27.98%)424(29.49%)
Not limited448(25.85%)414(24.21%)372(25.02%)323(22.46%)
Other reasons16(0.92%)17(0.99%)15(1.01%)14(0.97%)
Total1733171014871438
1 month after treatment
Severely limited90(5.18%)82(4.77%)70(4.75%)73(5.08%)
Moderately limited258(14.85%)257(14.94%)229(15.53%)228(15.87%)
Mildly limited322(18.54%)335(19.48%)269(18.24%)269(18.72%)
Slightly limited539(31.03%)550(31.98%)465(31.53%)473(32.92%)
Not limited514(29.59%)481(27.97%)429(29.08%)383(26.65%)
Other reasons14(0.81%)15(0.87%)13(0.88%)11(0.77%)
Total1737172014751437
3 months after treatment
Severely limited72(4.14%)61(3.54%)56(3.83%)50(3.52%)
Moderately limited227(13.05%)249(14.47%)203(13.89%)220(15.48%)
Mildly limited317(18.23%)298(17.32%)262(17.92%)229(16.12%)
Slightly limited560(32.20%)593(34.46%)475(32.49%)506(35.61%)
Not limited547(31.45%)504(29.29%)452(30.92%)405(28.50%)
Other reasons16(0.92%)16(0.93%)14(0.96%)11(0.77%)
Total1739172114621421
6 months after treatment
Severely limited67(3.85%)56(3.25%)46(3.19%)43(3.08%)
Moderately limited205(11.78%)213(12.36%)174(12.07%)175(12.52%)
Mildly limited287(16.49%)293(17.01%)234(16.24%)224(16.02%)
Slightly limited569(32.70%)584(33.89%)476(33.03%)492(35.19%)
Not limited595(34.20%)566(32.85%)495(34.35%)457(32.69%)
Other reasons17(0.98%)11(0.64%)16(1.11%)7(0.50%)
Total1740172314411398
9 months after treatment
Severely limited51(2.93%)49(2.84%)33(2.30%)34(2.47%)
Moderately limited193(11.08%)184(10.67%)162(11.31%)143(10.41%)
Mildly limited275(15.79%)289(16.76%)209(14.59%)218(15.87%)
Slightly limited558(32.03%)559(32.42%)464(32.40%)457(33.26%)
Not limited650(37.31%)631(36.60%)551(38.48%)515(37.48%)
Other reasons15(0.86%)12(0.70%)13(0.91%)7(0.51%)
Total1742172414321374
12 months after treatment
Severely limited45(2.58%)38(2.20%)25(1.76%)21(1.55%)
Moderately limited169(9.70%)147(8.53%)136(9.58%)105(7.73%)
Mildly limited260(14.93%)306(17.75%)191(13.45%)236(17.37%)
Slightly limited548(31.46%)532(30.86%)453(31.90%)423(31.13%)
Not limited705(40.47%)689(39.97%)602(42.39%)568(41.80%)
Other reasons15(0.86%)12(0.70%)13(0.92%)6(0.44%)
Total1742172414201359
Follow-up
Severely limited32(2.22%)21(1.52%)32(2.28%)21(1.55%)
Moderately limited133(9.24%)129(9.31%)129(9.19%)127(9.40%)
Mildly limited165(11.47%)186(13.42%)159(11.32%)179(13.25%)
Slightly limited491(34.12%)455(32.83%)483(34.40%)450(33.31%)
Not limited606(42.11%)588(42.42%)589(41.95%)567(41.97%)
Other reasons12(0.83%)7(0.51%)12(0.85%)7(0.52%)
Total1439138614041351
TABLE 48 — test of different observations (Question 1-6)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.640.5197−1.230.2193
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.550.5845−1.180.2363
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.780.4342−0.870.3852
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.740.4607−0.900.3661
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.410.6850−0.590.5534
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.380.7026−0.650.5167
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.260.7928−0.410.6830
TABLE 49 — different observations (Question 1-7)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited358(20.94%)340(20.02%)315(21.49%)298(20.84%)
Moderately limited332(19.42%)355(20.91%)285(19.44%)315(22.03%)
Mildly limited423(24.74%)416(24.50%)367(25.03%)343(23.99%)
Slightly limited367(21.46%)381(22.44%)312(21.28%)319(22.31%)
Not limited182(10.64%)158(9.31%)141(9.62%)114(7.97%)
Other reasons48(2.81%)48(2.83%)46(3.14%)41(2.87%)
Total1710169814661430
1 month after treatment
Severely limited304(17.68%)303(17.74%)259(17.75%)268(18.75%)
Moderately limited300(17.45%)285(16.69%)256(17.55%)241(16.86%)
Mildly limited408(23.73%)425(24.88%)348(23.85%)348(24.35%)
Slightly limited437(25.42%)447(26.17%)371(25.43%)374(26.17%)
Not limited221(12.86%)198(11.59%)180(12.34%)155(10.85%)
Other reasons49(2.85%)50(2.93%)45(3.08%)43(3.01%)
Total1719170814591429
3 months after treatment
Severely limited274(15.88%)281(16.42%)232(16.01%)245(17.31%)
Moserately limited260(15.07%)244(14.26%)216(14.91%)195(13.78%)
Mildly limited410(23.77%)435(25.42%)345(23.81%)359(25.37%)
Slightly limited489(28.35%)484(28.29%)416(28.71%)406(28.69%)
Not limited240(13.91%)217(12.68%)195(13.46%)172(12.16%)
Other reasons52(3.01%)50(2.92%)45(3.11%)38(2.69%)
Total1725171114491415
6 months after treatment
Severely limited265(15.33%)258(15.08%)213(14.88%)210(15.20%)
Moderately limited233(13.48%)233(13.62%)180(12.58%)173(12.52%)
Mildly limited367(21.23%)380(22.21%)307(21.45%)312(22.58%)
Slightly limited552(31.93%)538(31.44%)471(32.91%)449(32.49%)
Not limited251(14.52%)242(14.14%)207(14.47%)191(13.82%)
Other reasons61(3.53%)60(3.51%)53(3.70%)47(3.40%)
Total1729171114311382
9 months after treatment
Severely limited247(14.29%)239(13.97%)194(13.71%)190(14.00%)
Moderately limited205(11.86%)230(13.44%)154(10.88%)158(11.64%)
Mildly limited375(21.69%)353(20.63%)306(21.63%)281(20.71%)
Slightly limited540(31.23%)554(32.38%)456(32.23%)463(34.12%)
Not limited309(17.87%)278(16.25%)259(18.30%)222(16.36%)
Other reasons53(3.07%)57(3.33%)46(3.25%)43(3.17%)
Total1729171114151357
12 months after treatment
Severely limited224(12.95%)220(12.86%)169(12.05%)169(12.56%)
Moderately limited192(11.10%)209(12.22%)138(9.84%)137(10.18%)
Mildly limited354(20.46%)353(20.63%)284(20.24%)280(20.80%)
Slightly limited549(31.73%)552(32.26%)456(32.50%)456(33.88%)
Not limited354(20.46%)315(18.41%)306(21.81%)258(19.17%)
Other limited57(3.29%)62(3.62%)50(3.56%)46(3.42%)
Total1730171114031346
Follow-up
Severely limited166(11.67%)172(12.55%)162(11.68%)167(12.51%)
Moderately limited96(6.75%)102(7.45%)92(6.63%)101(7.57%)
Mildly limited313(22.01%)285(20.80%)304(21.92%)278(20.82%)
Slightly limited497(34.95%)489(35.69%)483(34.82%)478(35.81%)
Not limited314(22.08%)295(21.53%)310(22.35%)284(21.27%)
Other reasons36(2.53%)27(1.97%)36(2.60%)27(2.02%)
Total1422137013871335
TABLE 50 — test of different observations (Question 1-7)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.240.8095−0.780.4353
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.200.8421−0.710.4769
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.710.4807−1.040.3003
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.280.7763−0.670.5024
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.560.5786−0.720.4741
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.910.3617−1.250.2130
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.760.4501−0.990.3216
TABLE 51 — different observations (Question 1-8)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited444(25.96%)429(25.34%)388(26.45%)376(26.37%)
Moderately limited386(22.57%)408(24.10%)329(22.43%)348(24.40%)
Mildly limited404(23.63%)399(23.57%)358(24.40%)335(23.49%)
Slightly limited297(17.37%)278(16.42%)246(16.77%)229(16.06%)
Not limited138(8.07%)140(8.27%)109(7.43%)106(7.43%)
Other reasons41(2.40%)39(2.30%)37(2.52%)32(2.24%)
Total1710169314671426
1 month after treatment
Severely limited383(22.27%)367(21.51%)327(22.37%)323(22.60%)
Moderately limited353(20.52%)353(20.69%)304(20.79%)291(20.36%)
Mildly limited415(24.13%)443(25.97%)363(24.83%)378(26.45%)
Slightly limited366(21.28%)340(19.93%)305(20.86%)274(19.17%)
Not limited155(9.01%)164(9.61%)121(8.28%)130(9.10%)
Other reasons48(2.79%)39(2.29%)42(2.87%)33(2.31%)
Total1720170614621429
3 months after treatment
Severely limieted362(21.02%)360(21.08%)307(21.30%)305(21.62%)
Moderately limited308(17.89%)305(17.86%)258(17.90%)248(17.58%)
Mildly limited440(25.55%)456(26.70%)372(25.82%)385(27.29%)
Slightly limited376(21.84%)357(20.90%)311(21.58%)292(20.69%)
Not limited184(10.69%)189(11.07%)151(10.48%)149(10.56%)
Other reasons52(3.02%)41(2.40%)42(2.91%)32(2.27%)
Total1722170814411411
6 months after treatment
Severely limited334(19.38%)331(19.37%)270(18.96%)269(19.51%)
Moderately limited283(16.42%)292(17.09%)228(16.01%)222(16.10%)
Mildly limited436(25.30%)447(26.16%)369(25.91%)374(27.12%)
Slightly limited422(24.49%)386(22.59%)349(24.51%)312(22.63%)
Not limited183(10.62%)205(12.00%)154(10.81%)165(11.97%)
Other reasons65(3.77%)48(2.81%)54(3.79%)37(2.68%)
Total1723170914241379
9 months after treatment
Severely limited309(17.93%)311(18.20%)243(17.23%)241(17.76%)
Moderately limited259(15.03%)264(15.45%)199(14.11%)189(13.93%)
Mildly limited423(24.55%)428(25.04%)354(25.11%)355(26.16%)
Slightly limited464(26.93%)433(25.34%)387(27.45%)353(26.01%)
Not limited206(11.96%)217(12.70%)174(12.34%)175(12.90%)
Other limited62(3.60%)56(3.28%)53(3.76%)44(3.24%)
Total1723170914101357
12 months after treatment
Severely limited291(16.89%)299(17.50%)219(15.68%)222(16.55%)
Moderately limited230(13.35%)247(14.45%)170(12.17%)177(13.20%)
Mildly limited426(24.72%)411(24.05%)349(24.98%)333(24.83%)
Slightly limited473(27.45%)448(26.21%)397(28.42%)361(26.92%)
Not limited235(13.64%)241(14.10%)203(14.53%)198(14.77%)
Other reasons68(3.95%)63(3.69%)59(4.22%)50(3.73%)
Total1723170913971341
Follow-up
Severely limited208(14.74%)210(15.37%)203(14.75%)205(15.40%)
Moderately limited168(11.91%)182(13.32%)163(11.85%)178(13.37%)
Mildly limited353(25.02%)335(24.52%)343(24.93%)329(24.72%)
Slightly limited425(30.12%)388(28.40%)414(30.09%)375(28.17%)
Not limited212(15.02%)215(15.74%)208(15.12%)208(15.63%)
Other reasons45(3.19%)36(2.64%)45(3.27%)36(2.70%)
Total1411136613761331
TABLE 52 — test of different observations (Question 1-8)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.230.8193−0.640.5196
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.010.9943−0.310.7548
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.390.6969−0.510.6122
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.520.6032−0.720.4724
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.440.6604−0.510.6086
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.690.4877−0.970.3307
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.850.3968−1.010.3130
TABLE 53 — different observations (Question 1-9)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severely limited802(47.34%)818(48.69%)705(48.55%)711(50.25%)
Moderately limited359(21.19%)341(20.30%)301(20.73%)277(19.58%)
Mildly limited249(14.70%)244(14.52%)213(14.67%)200(14.13%)
Slightly limited145(8.56%)142(8.45%)108(7.44%)111(7.84%)
Not limited40(2.36%)36(2.14%)33(2.27%)28(1.98%)
Other reasons99(5.84%)99(5.89%)92(6.34%)88(6.22%)
Total1694168014521415
1 month after treatment
Severely limited714(41.93%)716(42.24%)617(42.70%)613(43.35%)
Moderately limited358(21.02%)341(20.12%)310(21.45%)285(20.16%)
Mildly limited284(16.68%)314(18.53%)239(16.54%)262(18.53%)
Slightly limited193(11.33%)172(10.15%)143(9.90%)131(9.26%)
Not limited49(2.88%)54(3.19%)43(2.98%)38(2.69%)
Other reasons105(6.17%)98(5.78%)93(6.44%)85(6.01%)
Total1703169514451414
3 months after treatment
Severely limited664(38.90%)677(39.85%)564(39.41%)565(40.41%)
Moderately limited342(20.04%)338(19.89%)293(20.48%)281(20.10%)
Mildly limited318(18.63%)312(18.36%)264(18.45%)266(19.03%)
Slightly limited220(12.89%)205(12.07%)170(11.88%)153(10.94%)
Not limited61(3.57%)70(4.12%)53(3.70%)56(4.01%)
Other reaons102(5.98%)97(5.71%)87(6.08%)77(5.51%)
Total1707169914311398
6 months after treatment
Severely limited606(35.42%)625(36.76%)490(34.70%)498(36.32%)
Moderately limited357(20.86%)339(19.94%)305(21.60%)276(20.13%)
Mildly limited341(19.93%)332(19.53%)289(20.47%)283(20.64%)
Slightly limited243(14.20%)230(13.53%)188(13.31%)179(13.06%)
Not limited58(3.39%)72(4.24%)50(3.54%)54(3.94%)
Other limited106(6.20%)102(6.00%)90(6.37%)81(5.91%)
Total1711170014121371
9 months after treatment
Severely limited572(33.39%)585(34.41%)452(32.38%)443(32.96%)
Moderately limited353(20.61%)348(20.47%)292(20.92%)282(20.98%)
Mildly limited332(19.38%)340(20.00%)275(19.70%)288(21.43%)
Slightly limited293(17.10%)258(15.18%)237(16.98%)207(15.40%)
Not limited67(3.91%)70(4.12%)59(4.23%)47(3.50%)
Other reasons96(5.60%)99(5.82%)81(5.80%)77(5.73%)
Total1713170013961344
12 months after treatment
Severely limited542(31.62%)552(32.47%)412(29.75%)406(30.55%)
Moderately limited350(20.42%)345(20.29%)289(20.87%)276(20.77%)
Mildly limited336(19.60%)322(18.94%)278(20.07%)271(20.39%)
Slightly limited307(17.91%)290(17.06%)249(17.98%)234(17.61%)
Not limited78(4.55%)92(5.41%)70(5.05%)67(5.04%)
Other reasons101(5.89%)99(5.82%)87(6.28%)75(5.64%)
Total1714170013851329
Follow-up
Severely-limited379(27.13%)380(28.23%)372(27.29%)374(28.53%)
Moderately limited296(21.19%)294(21.84%)288(21.13%)283(21.59%)
Mildly limited285(20.40%)264(19.61%)276(20.25%)259(19.76%)
Slightly limited287(20.54%)276(20.51%)279(20.47%)268(20.44%)
Not limited85(6.08%)73(5.42%)83(6.09%)68(5.19%)
Other reasons65(4.65%)59(4.38%)65(4.77%)59(4.50%)
Total1397134613631311
TABLE 54 — test of different observations (Question 1-9)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.630.5316−0.700.4812
1 month afterRank-sum test−0.200.8424−0.320.7475
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.540.5911−0.630.5301
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.440.6593−0.540.5887
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.700.4839−0.760.4486
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.300.7617−0.600.5458
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.900.3681−0.980.3292
TABLE 55 — different observations (2 nd question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Clearly increased55(3.17%)59(3.45%)46(3.09%)46(3.19%)
Slightly increased120(6.92%)122(7.13%)100(6.72%)104(7.22%)
Same1076(62.09%)1091(63.73%)938(63.00%)938(65.14%)
Slightly reduced266(15.35%)260(15.19%)224(15.04%)209(14.51%)
Clearly reduced216(12.46%)180(10.51%)181(12.16%)143(9.93%)
Total1733171214891440
1 month after treatment
Clearly increased16(0.92%)14(0.81%)8(0.54%)9(0.62%)
Slightly increased53(3.05%)51(2.96%)43(2.90%)43(2.98%)
Same853(49.05%)831(48.29%)735(49.63%)698(48.44%)
Slightly reduced530(30.48%)544(31.61%)447(30.18%)451(31.30%)
Clearly reduced287(16.50%)281(16.33%)248(16.75%)240(16.66%)
Total1739172114811441
3 months after treatment
Clearly increased16(0.92%)15(0.87%)6(0.41%)7(0.49%)
Slightly increased66(3.79%)59(3.42%)50(3.42%)42(2.94%)
Same733(42.13%)698(40.51%)614(41.97%)574(40.20%)
Slightly reduced557(32.01%)592(34.36%)471(32.19%)499(34.94%)
Clearly reduced368(21.15%)359(20.84%)322(22.01%)306(21.43%)
Total1740172314631428
6 months after treatment
Clearly increased17(0.98%)25(1.45%)3(0.21%)10(0.71%)
Slightly increased64(3.68%)69(4.00%)40(2.76%)48(3.42%)
Same650(37.33%)584(33.89%)528(36.46%)460(32.79%)
Slightly reduced610(35.04%)658(38.19%)522(36.05%)554(39.49%)
Clearly reduced400(22.98%)386(22.40%)355(24.52%)331(23.59%)
60(0.00%)1(0.06%)
Total1741172314481403
9 months after treatment
Clearly increased25(1.44%)29(1.68%)9(0.63%)7(0.51%)
Slightly increased69(3.96%)58(3.37%)46(3.21%)31(2.24%)
Same626(35.94%)583(33.84%)501(34.94%)450(32.59%)
Slightly reduced601(34.50%)620(35.98%)505(35.22%)515(37.29%)
Clearly reduced421(24.17%)432(25.07%)373(26.01%)378(27.37%)
60(0.00%)1(0.06%)
Total1742172314341381
12 months after treatment
Clearly increased23(1.32%)30(1.74%)2(0.14%)4(0.29%)
Slightly increased55(3.16%)62(3.60%)28(1.96%)34(2.49%)
Same659(37.83%)638(37.03%)528(37.05%)500(36.63%)
Slightly reduced525(30.14%)510(29.60%)439(30.81%)404(29.60%)
Clearly reduced480(27.55%)482(27.97%)428(30.04%)423(30.99%)
60(0.00%)1(0.06%)
Total1742172314251365
Follow-up
Clearly increased3(0.21%)6(0.43%)3(0.21%)6(0.44%)
Slightly increased107(7.40%)130(9.36%)104(7.38%)127(9.39%)
Same567(39.24%)552(39.74%)552(39.15%)539(39.84%)
Slightly reduced366(25.33%)315(22.68%)361(25.60%)305(22.54%)
Clearly reduced402(27.82%)386(27.79%)390(27.66%)376(27.79%)
Total1445138914101353
TABLE 56 — test of different observations (2 nd question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−1.490.1361−1.750.0805
1 month afterRank-sum test0.430.66600.350.7274
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.830.40540.730.4662
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.690.49290.390.6986
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test1.300.19201.780.0754
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.070.94800.070.9466
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−1.350.1774−1.380.1666
TABLE 57 — different observations (3 rd question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
≧4 times per day55(3.17%)59(3.45%)46(3.09%)46(3.19%)
1-3 times per day120(6.92%)122(7.13%)100(6.72%)104(7.22%)
≧3 times per week1076(62.09%)1091(63.73%)938(63.00%)938(65.14%)
1-2 times per week266(15.35%)260(15.19%)224(15.04%)209(14.51%)
<1 time per week216(12.46%)180(10.51%)181(12.16%)143(9.93%)
No onset0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1733171214891440
1 month after treatment
≧4 times per day16(0.92%)14(0.81%)8(0.54%)9(0.62%)
1-3 times per day53(3.05%)51(2.96%)43(2.90%)43(2.98%)
≧3 times per week853(49.05%)831(48.29%)735(49.63%)698(48.44%)
1-2 times per week530(30.48%)544(31.61%)447(30.18%)451(31.30%)
<1 time per week287(16.50%)281(16.33%)248(16.75%)240(16.66%)
No onset0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1739172114811441
3 months after treatment
≧4 times per day16(0.92%)15(0.87%)6(0.41%)7(0.49%)
1-3 times per day66(3.79%)59(3.42%)50(3.42%)42(2.94%)
≧3 times per week733(42.13%)698(40.51%)614(41.97%)574(40.20%)
1-2 times per week557(32.01%)592(34.36%)471(32.19%)499(34.94%)
<1 time per week368(21.15%)359(20.84%)322(22.01%)306(21.43%)
No onset0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1740172314631428
6 months after treatment
≧4 times per day17(0.98%)25(1.45%)3(0.21%)10(0.71%)
1-3 times per day64(3.68%)69(4.00%)40(2.76%)48(3.42%)
≧3 times per week650(37.33%)584(33.89%)528(36.46%)460(32.79%)
1-2 times per week610(35.04%)658(38.19%)522(36.05%)554(39.49%)
<1 time per week400(22.98%)386(22.40%)355(24.52%)331(23.59%)
No onset0(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1741172314481403
9 months after treatment
≧4 times per day25(1.44%)29(1.68%)9(0.63%)7(0.51%)
1-3 times per day69(3.96%)58(3.37%)46(3.21%)31(2.24%)
≧3 times per week626(35.94%)583(33.84%)501(34.94%)450(32.59%)
1-2 times per week601(34.50%)620(35.98%)505(35.22%)515(37.29%)
<1 time per week421(24.17%)432(25.07%)373(26.01%)378(27.37%)
No onset0(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1742172314341381
12 months after treatment
≧4 times per day23(1.32%)30(1.74%)2(0.14%)4(0.29%)
1-3 times per day55(3.16%)62(3.60%)28(1.96%)34(2.49%)
≧3 times per week659(37.83%)638(37.03%)528(37.05%)500(36.63%)
1-2 times per week525(30.14%)510(29.60%)439(30.81%)404(29.60%)
<1 time per week480(27.55%)482(27.97%)428(30.04%)423(30.99%)
No onset0(0.00%)1(0.06%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1742172314251365
Follow-up
≧4 times per day3(0.21%)6(0.43%)3(0.21%)6(0.44%)
1-3 times per day107(7.40%)130(9.36%)104(7.38%)127(9.39%)
≧3 times per week567(39.24%)552(39.74%)552(39.15%)539(39.84%)
1-2 times per week366(25.33%)315(22.68%)361(25.60%)305(22.54%)
<1 time per week402(27.82%)386(27.79%)390(27.66%)376(27.79%)
No onset0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Total1445138914101353
TABLE 58 — test of different observations (3 rd question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−1.490.1361−1.750.0805
1 month afterRank-sum test0.430.66600.350.7274
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.830.40540.730.4662
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.690.49290.390.6986
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test1.300.19201.780.0754
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.070.94800.070.9466
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−1.350.1774−1.380.1666
TABLE 59 — different observations (4 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
≧4 times per day16(0.92%)20(1.17%)14(0.94%)18(1.25%)
1-3 times per day150(8.64%)133(7.75%)131(8.78%)120(8.31%)
≧3 times per week293(16.87%)291(16.96%)260(17.43%)247(17.11%)
1-2 times per week344(19.80%)367(21.39%)301(20.17%)310(21.47%)
<1 time per week176(10.13%)195(11.36%)142(9.52%)163(11.29%)
Not used758(43.64%)710(41.38%)644(43.16%)586(40.58%)
Total1737171614921444
1 month after treatment
≧4 times per day1(0.06%)8(0.46%)1(0.07%)8(0.55%)
1-3times per day114(6.54%)111(6.44%)97(6.52%)106(7.33%)
≧3 times per week230(13.19%)195(11.31%)204(13.71%)160(11.06%)
1-2 times per week306(17.55%)363(21.06%)259(17.41%)301(20.80%)
<1 time per week167(9.58%)196(11.37%)135(9.07%)159(10.99%)
Not used926(53.10%)851(49.36%)792(53.23%)713(49.27%)
Total1744172414881447
3 months after treatment
≧4 times per day1(0.06%)4(0.23%)0(0.00%)3(0.21%)
1-3 times per day97(5.56%)93(5.39%)78(5.31%)87(6.08%)
≧3 times per week187(10.72%)172(9.98%)155(10.55%)141(9.85%)
1-2 times per week291(16.69%)336(19.49%)251(17.09%)280(19.55%)
<1 time per week200(11.47%)209(12.12%)152(10.35%)160(11.17%)
Not used968(55.50%)910(52.78%)833(56.71%)761(53.14%)
Total1744172414691432
6 months after treatment
≧4 times per day2(0.11%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
1-3 times per day82(4.70%)83(4.81%)56(3.85%)74(5.25%)
≧3 times per week127(7.28%)119(6.90%)95(6.53%)85(6.03%)
1-2 times per week306(17.55%)324(18.78%)263(18.08%)261(18.52%)
<1 time per week209(11.98%)239(13.86%)165(11.34%)200(14.19%)
Not used1018(58.37%)958(55.54%)875(60.14%)789(56.00%)
Total1744172514551409
9 months after treatment
≧4 times per day2(0.11%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
1-3 times per week75(4.30%)79(4.58%)49(3.41%)69(4.99%)
≧3 times per week90(5.16%)93(5.39%)58(4.03%)51(3.68%)
1-2 times per week272(15.60%)255(14.78%)230(15.99%)191(13.80%)
<1 time per week264(15.14%)291(16.87%)215(14.95%)246(17.77%)
Not used1041(59.69%)1004(58.20%)885(61.54%)827(59.75%)
Total1744172514381384
12 months after treatment
≧4 times per day2(0.11%)4(0.23%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
1-3 times per week74(4.24%)78(4.52%)48(3.36%)66(4.82%)
≧3 times per week69(3.96%)77(4.46%)32(2.24%)29(2.12%)
1-2 times per week185(10.61%)198(11.48%)147(10.29%)134(9.80%)
<1 time per week288(16.51%)234(13.57%)234(16.38%)194(14.18%)
Not used1126(64.56%)1134(65.74%)968(67.74%)944(69.01%)
Total1744172514291368
Follow-up
≧4 times per day0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
1-3 times per week41(2.84%)57(4.10%)40(2.83%)56(4.14%)
≧3 times per week26(1.80%)25(1.80%)26(1.84%)25(1.85%)
1-2 times per week192(13.28%)173(12.45%)186(13.17%)168(12.41%)
<1 time per week232(16.04%)234(16.83%)227(16.08%)233(17.21%)
Not used955(66.04%)901(64.82%)933(66.08%)872(64.40%)
Total1446139014121354
TABLE 60 — test of different observations (4 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test−0.630.5273−0.690.4891
1 month afterRank-sum test−1.360.1727−1.460.1453
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−1.240.2164−1.730.0828
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−1.260.2064−1.910.0559
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.680.4937−0.730.4657
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test0.180.85560.310.7588
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test−0.750.4507−0.960.3348
TABLE 61 — different observations (5 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severe60(3.45%)46(2.68%)48(3.21%)40(2.77%)
Moderate356(20.50%)391(22.75%)318(21.29%)349(24.14%)
Mild534(30.74%)518(30.13%)467(31.26%)432(29.88%)
Few328(18.88%)328(19.08%)287(19.21%)269(18.60%)
None407(23.43%)387(22.51%)329(22.02%)315(21.78%)
Not medicated by doctors52(2.99%)49(2.85%)45(3.01%)41(2.84%)
Total1737171914941446
1 month after treatment
Severe42(2.41%)36(2.09%)32(2.15%)31(2.14%)
Moderate304(17.43%)288(16.70%)271(18.24%)245(16.92%)
Mild504(28.90%)490(28.41%)430(28.94%)400(27.62%)
Few376(21.56%)409(23.71%)322(21.67%)357(24.65%)
None459(26.32%)454(26.32%)378(25.44%)374(25.83%)
Not medicated by doctors59(3.38%)48(2.78%)53(3.57%)41(2.83%)
Total1744172514861448
3 months after treatment
Severe30(1.72%)22(1.28%)21(1.43%)16(1.12%)
Moderate273(15.65%)266(15.42%)237(16.13%)221(15.43%)
Mild458(26.26%)443(25.68%)384(26.14%)364(25.42%)
Few429(24.60%)464(26.90%)361(24.57%)392(27.37%)
None478(27.41%)467(27.07%)399(27.16%)383(26.75%)
Not medicated by doctors76(4.36%)63(3.65%)67(4.56%)56(3.91%)
Total1744172514691432
6 months after treatment
≧4 times per day15(0.86%)15(0.87%)6(0.41%)8(0.57%)
1-3 times per day201(11.53%)200(11.59%)160(11.00%)146(10.36%)
≧3 times per week503(28.84%)464(26.90%)421(28.93%)382(27.11%)
1-2 times per week460(26.38%)495(28.70%)393(27.01%)418(29.67%)
<1 time per week490(28.10%)476(27.59%)410(28.18%)391(27.75%)
No onset75(4.30%)75(4.35%)65(4.47%)64(4.54%)
Total1744172514551409
9 months after treatment
≧4 times per day16(0.92%)22(1.28%)7(0.49%)12(0.87%)
1-3 times per day139(7.97%)139(8.06%)96(6.68%)85(6.13%)
≧3 times per week513(29.42%)468(27.13%)424(29.49%)376(27.13%)
1-2 times per week500(28.67%)527(30.55%)432(30.04%)444(32.03%)
<1 time per week498(28.56%)490(28.41%)412(28.65%)401(28.93%)
No onset78(4.47%)79(4.58%)67(4.66%)68(4.91%)
Total1744172514381386
12 months after treatment
≧4 times per day14(0.80%)21(1.22%)4(0.28%)8(0.58%)
1-3 times per day107(6.14%)127(7.36%)59(4.13%)71(5.19%)
≧3 times per week451(25.86%)397(23.01%)362(25.33%)300(21.91%)
1-2 times per week558(32.00%)573(33.22%)486(34.01%)486(35.50%)
<1 time per week522(29.93%)525(30.43%)437(30.58%)432(31.56%)
No onset92(5.28%)82(4.75%)81(5.67%)72(5.26%)
Total1744172514291369
Follow-up
≧4 times per day2(0.14%)4(0.29%)2(0.14%)3(0.22%)
1-3 times per day46(3.17%)48(3.45%)45(3.18%)48(3.54%)
≧3 times per week363(25.03%)331(23.78%)355(25.09%)323(23.82%)
1-2 times per week478(32.97%)469(33.69%)465(32.86%)456(33.63%)
<1 time per week452(31.17%)445(31.97%)442(31.24%)431(31.78%)
No onset109(7.52%)95(6.82%)106(7.49%)95(7.01%)
Total1450139214151356
TABLE 62 — test of different observations (5 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineChi-square test4.230.51663.820.5754
1 month afterChi-square test3.530.61845.280.3831
treatment
3 months afterChi-square test4.180.52343.890.5660
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.400.68670.620.5356
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test0.470.64080.920.3566
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.030.97790.490.6242
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.070.94040.100.9221
TABLE 63 — different observations (6 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Dissatisfied20(1.15%)12(0.70%)17(1.14%)12(0.83%)
Mostly dissatisfied114(6.54%)104(6.07%)97(6.48%)93(6.45%)
Partly satisfied548(31.46%)546(31.86%)497(33.20%)480(33.29%)
Mostly satisfied793(45.52%)789(46.03%)663(44.29%)647(44.87%)
Highly satisfied267(15.33%)263(15.34%)223(14.90%)210(14.56%)
Total1742171414971442
1 month after treatment
Dissatisfied8(0.46%)4(0.23%)3(0.20%)3(0.21%)
Mostly dissatisfied70(4.01%)69(4.00%)65(4.37%)57(3.94%)
Partly satisfied495(28.38%)469(27.20%)442(29.68%)405(27.97%)
Mostly satisfied857(49.14%)860(49.88%)713(47.88%)718(49.59%)
Highly consent314(18.00%)322(18.68%)266(17.86%)265(18.30%)
Total1744172414891448
3 months after treatment
Dissatisfied4(0.23%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
Mostly dissatisfied46(2.64%)51(2.96%)37(2.51%)41(2.86%)
Partly satisfied448(25.69%)410(23.78%)387(26.29%)342(23.87%)
Mostly satisfied904(51.83%)905(52.49%)752(51.09%)759(52.97%)
Highly satisfied342(19.61%)355(20.59%)295(20.04%)289(20.17%)
Total1744172414721433
6 months after treatment
Dissatisfied3(0.17%)2(0.12%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)
Mostly dissatisfied34(1.95%)37(2.15%)24(1.65%)21(1.49%)
Partly satisfied358(20.53%)360(20.88%)293(20.14%)285(20.23%)
Mostly satisfied972(55.73%)941(54.58%)814(55.95%)782(55.50%)
Highly satisfied377(21.62%)384(22.27%)324(22.27%)320(22.71%)
Total1744172414551409
9 months after treatment
Dissatisfied4(0.23%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
Mostly dissatisfied34(1.95%)31(1.80%)22(1.53%)13(0.94%)
Partly satisfied269(15.42%)284(16.47%)203(14.10%)197(14.22%)
Mostly satisfied1025(58.77%)996(57.77%)855(59.38%)825(59.57%)
Highly satisfied412(23.62%)410(23.78%)359(24.93%)348(25.13%)
Total1744172414401385
12 months after treatment
Dissatisfied5(0.29%)3(0.17%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied27(1.55%)27(1.57%)12(0.84%)8(0.58%)
Partly satisfied204(11.70%)236(13.69%)137(9.59%)144(10.53%)
Mostly satisfied1057(60.61%)1017(58.99%)882(61.72%)842(61.55%)
Highly satisfied451(25.86%)441(25.58%)397(27.78%)374(27.34%)
Total1744172414291368
Follow-up
Dissatisfied0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied9(0.62%)5(0.36%)9(0.63%)5(0.37%)
Partly satisfied123(8.45%)136(9.74%)122(8.59%)131(9.63%)
Mostly satisfied913(62.75%)845(60.53%)884(62.25%)821(60.37%)
Highly satisfied410(28.18%)410(29.37%)405(28.52%)403(29.63%)
Total1455139614201360
TABLE 64 — test of different observations (6 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.440.66130.070.9403
1 month afterRank-sum test0.910.36541.060.2889
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test1.060.28900.780.4379
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.060.95480.190.8514
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.260.79230.280.7817
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.930.3518−0.420.6713
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.200.84070.260.7977
TABLE 65 — different observations (7 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Dissatisfied7(0.40%)2(0.12%)5(0.33%)2(0.14%)
Mostly dissatisfied80(4.60%)78(4.55%)73(4.88%)72(5.00%)
Partly satisfied463(26.61%)447(26.09%)418(27.94%)396(27.48%)
Mostly satisfied835(47.99%)840(49.04%)696(46.52%)696(48.30%)
Highly satisfied355(20.40%)346(20.20%)304(20.32%)275(19.08%)
Total1740171314961441
1 month after treatment
Dissatisfied3(0.17%)1(0.06%)2(0.13%)1(0.07%)
Mostly dissatisfied54(3.10%)55(3.20%)50(3.36%)49(3.39%)
Partly satisfied409(23.48%)389(22.60%)363(24.41%)336(23.25%)
Mostly satisfied870(49.94%)878(51.02%)724(48.69%)738(51.07%)
Highly satisfied406(23.31%)398(23.13%)348(23.40%)321(22.21%)
Total1742172114871445
3 months after treatment
Dissatisfied2(0.11%)2(0.12%)1(0.07%)2(0.14%)
Mostly dissatisfied34(1.95%)38(2.21%)27(1.84%)33(2.31%)
Partly satisfied369(21.18%)344(19.99%)317(21.56%)286(20.00%)
Mostly satisfied942(54.08%)919(53.40%)786(53.47%)765(53.50%)
Highly satisfied395(22.68%)418(24.29%)339(23.06%)344(24.06%)
Total1742172114701430
6 months after treatment
Dissatisfied2(0.11%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied23(1.32%)21(1.22%)16(1.10%)15(1.07%)
Partly satisfied267(15.33%)269(15.63%)217(14.93%)206(14.66%)
Mostly satisfied1014(58.21%)1005(58.40%)846(58.22%)833(59.29%)
Highly satisfied436(25.03%)426(24.75%)373(25.67%)351(24.98%)
Total1742172114531405
9 months after treatment
Dissatisfied2(0.11%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Most dissatisfied19(1.09%)15(0.87%)12(0.83%)8(0.58%)
Partly satisfied210(12.06%)210(12.20%)157(10.92%)139(10.06%)
Mostly satisfied1037(59.53%)1043(60.60%)859(59.74%)855(61.87%)
Highly satisfied474(27.21%)453(26.32%)409(28.44%)380(27.50%)
Total1742172114381382
12 months after treatment
Dissatisfied2(0.11%)0(0.00%)1(0.07%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied13(0.75%)15(0.87%)4(0.28%)7(0.51%)
Partly satisfied170(9.76%)171(9.94%)115(8.06%)98(7.17%)
Mostly satisfied1042(59.82%)1041(60.49%)861(60.34%)845(61.86%)
Highly satisfied515(29.56%)494(28.70%)446(31.25%)416(30.45%)
Total1742172114271366
Follow-up
Dissatisfied0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied4(0.28%)4(0.29%)4(0.28%)4(0.29%)
Partly satisfied97(6.68%)109(7.82%)97(6.84%)104(7.66%)
Mostly satisfied908(62.49%)823(59.08%)881(62.13%)800(58.95%)
Highly satisfied444(30.56%)457(32.81%)436(30.75%)449(33.09%)
Total1453139314181357
TABLE 66 — test of different observations (7 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.330.7387−0.200.8442
1 month afterRank-sum test0.290.76800.020.9879
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test1.060.29020.720.4725
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.150.8824−0.150.8806
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.350.73000.020.9822
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.530.5985−0.130.8935
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.690.48970.840.3991
TABLE 67 — different observations (8 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Dissatisfied16(0.92%)9(0.53%)13(0.87%)8(0.56%)
Mostly dissatisfied114(6.55%)101(5.90%)99(6.61%)94(6.52%)
Partly satisfied538(30.90%)542(31.64%)487(32.53%)466(32.34%)
Mostly satisfied801(46.01%)809(47.23%)676(45.16%)673(46.70%)
Highly satisfied272(15.62%)252(14.71%)222(14.83%)200(13.88%)
Total1741171314971441
1 month after treatment
Dissatisfied6(0.34%)5(0.29%)2(0.13%)4(0.28%)
Mostly dissatisfied71(4.07%)65(3.77%)63(4.23%)54(3.73%)
Partly satisfied487(27.92%)472(27.39%)435(29.23%)402(27.78%)
Mostly satisfied877(50.29%)876(50.84%)729(48.99%)738(51.00%)
Highly satisfied303(17.37%)305(17.70%)259(17.41%)249(17.21%)
Total1744172314881447
3 months after treatment
Dissatisfied3(0.17%)4(0.23%)1(0.07%)3(0.21%)
Mostly dissatisfied54(3.10%)57(3.31%)42(2.85%)43(3.01%)
Partly satisfied433(24.83%)409(23.72%)373(25.34%)338(23.64%)
Mostly satisfied921(52.81%)910(52.78%)770(52.31%)764(53.43%)
Highly satisfied333(19.09%)344(19.95%)286(19.43%)282(19.72%)
Total1744172414721430
6 months after treatment
Dissatisfied3(0.17%)6(0.35%)1(0.07%)3(0.21%)
Mostly satisfied39(2.24%)38(2.20%)23(1.58%)21(1.49%)
Partly satisfied361(20.70%)365(21.17%)305(20.96%)286(20.34%)
Mostly satisfied987(56.59%)950(55.10%)825(56.70%)792(56.33%)
Highly satisfied354(20.30%)365(21.17%)301(20.69%)304(21.62%)
Total1744172414551406
9 months after treatment
Dissatisfied6(0.34%)6(0.35%)4(0.28%)2(0.14%)
Mostly dissatisfied33(1.89%)36(2.09%)17(1.18%)19(1.37%)
Partly satisfied298(17.09%)274(15.89%)239(16.59%)183(13.23%)
Mostly satisfied1017(58.31%)1027(59.57%)847(58.78%)858(62.04%)
Highly satisfied390(22.36%)381(22.10%)334(23.18%)321(23.21%)
Total1744172414411383
12 months after treatment
Dissatisfied5(0.29%)5(0.29%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Mostly dissatisfied35(2.01%)40(2.32%)18(1.26%)22(1.61%)
Partly satisfied215(12.33%)235(13.63%)154(10.78%)141(10.31%)
Mostly satisfied1048(60.09%)1014(58.82%)874(61.16%)838(61.26%)
Highly satisfied441(25.29%)430(24.94%)383(26.80%)367(26.83%)
Total1744172414291368
Follow-up
Dissatisfied1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)1(0.07%)
Mostly dissatisfied9(0.62%)9(0.65%)9(0.64%)9(0.66%)
Partly satisfied155(10.67%)137(9.82%)154(10.87%)133(9.79%)
Mostly satisfied880(60.61%)842(60.36%)854(60.27%)819(60.26%)
Highly satisfied407(28.03%)406(29.10%)399(28.16%)397(29.21%)
Total1452139514171359
TABLE 68 — test of different observations (8 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.050.95870.040.9701
1 month afterRank-sum test0.570.56860.710.4753
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.660.50630.620.5342
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.090.92850.590.5535
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test0.290.77301.320.1885
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.880.37990.040.9715
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.820.41360.880.3792
TABLE 69 — different observations (9 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Severe63(3.62%)60(3.50%)50(3.34%)52(3.60%)
Moderate468(26.88%)427(24.90%)404(26.99%)371(25.71%)
Mild639(36.70%)624(36.38%)554(37.01%)516(35.76%)
Few366(21.02%)409(23.85%)313(20.91%)335(23.22%)
Uneffective205(11.77%)195(11.37%)176(11.76%)169(11.71%)
Total1741171514971443
1 month after treatment
Severe39(2.24%)30(1.74%)30(2.01%)24(1.66%)
Moderate328(18.81%)309(17.93%)282(18.94%)267(18.45%)
Mild629(36.07%)613(35.58%)535(35.93%)513(35.45%)
Few467(26.78%)517(30.01%)385(25.86%)429(29.65%)
Uneffective281(16.11%)254(14.74%)257(17.26%)214(14.79%)
Total1744172314891447
3 months after treatment
Severe26(1.49%)20(1.16%)14(0.95%)14(0.98%)
Moderate272(15.60%)264(15.32%)228(15.51%)220(15.36%)
Mild585(33.54%)586(34.01%)485(32.99%)475(33.17%)
Few556(31.88%)573(33.26%)464(31.56%)480(33.52%)
Uneffective305(17.49%)280(16.25%)279(18.98%)243(16.97%)
Total1744172314701432
6 months after treatment
Severe15(0.86%)18(1.04%)3(0.21%)9(0.64%)
Moderate203(11.64%)213(12.35%)153(10.54%)161(11.43%)
Mild604(34.63%)583(33.82%)500(34.44%)480(34.09%)
Few606(34.75%)604(35.03%)508(34.99%)497(35.30%)
Uneffective316(18.12%)306(17.75%)288(19.83%)261(18.54%)
Total1744172414521408
9 months after treatment
Severe17(0.97%)17(0.99%)5(0.35%)4(0.29%)
Moderate153(8.77%)161(9.34%)101(7.01%)109(7.88%)
Mild577(33.08%)573(33.24%)472(32.78%)454(32.83%)
Few659(37.79%)652(37.82%)556(38.61%)535(38.68%)
Uneffective338(19.38%)321(18.62%)306(21.25%)281(20.32%)
Total1744172414401383
12 months after treatment
Severe17(0.97%)18(1.04%)3(0.21%)3(0.22%)
Moderate119(6.82%)145(8.41%)64(4.48%)89(6.51%)
Mild533(30.56%)487(28.25%)423(29.64%)367(26.83%)
Few693(39.74%)706(40.95%)591(41.42%)588(42.98%)
Uneffective382(21.90%)368(21.35%)346(24.25%)321(23.46%)
Total1744172414271368
Follow-up
Severe2(0.14%)2(0.14%)2(0.14%)2(0.15%)
Moderate55(3.78%)66(4.73%)55(3.87%)65(4.78%)
Mild397(27.29%)361(25.86%)388(27.32%)353(25.97%)
Few644(44.26%)599(42.91%)628(44.23%)588(43.27%)
Uneffective357(24.54%)368(26.36%)347(24.44%)351(25.83%)
Total1455139614201359
TABLE 70 — test of different observations (9 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test1.400.16160.910.3620
1 month afterRank-sum test0.760.44600.140.8882
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test−0.090.9289−0.480.6278
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test−0.370.7115−0.990.3215
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test−0.640.5213−0.720.4698
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.270.7852−0.310.7529
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.640.52330.480.6342
TABLE 71 — different observations (10 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Dissatisfied451(25.90%)416(s24.21%)378(25.25%)343(23.74%)
Mostly dissatisfied413(23.72%)454(26.43%)361(24.11%)398(27.54%)
Partly satisfied543(31.19%)509(29.63%)483(32.26%)434(30.03%)
Mostly satisfied294(16.89%)304(17.69%)244(16.30%)242(16.75%)
Highly satisfied40(2.30%)35(2.04%)31(2.07%)28(1.94%)
Total1741171814971445
1 month after treatment
Dissatisfied396(22.71%)390(22.62%)331(22.24%)326(22.58%)
Mostly dissatisfied400(22.94%)384(22.27%)344(23.12%)327(22.65%)
Partly satisfied516(29.59%)498(28.89%)455(30.58%)415(28.74%)
Mostly satisfied361(20.70%)376(21.81%)295(19.83%)312(21.61%)
Highly satisfied71(4.07%)76(4.41%)63(4.23%)64(4.43%)
Total1744172414881444
3 months after treatment
Dissatisfied372(21.33%)373(21.64%)307(20.88%)306(21.37%)
Mostly dissatisfied387(22.19%)375(21.75%)329(22.38%)313(21.86%)
Partly satisfied481(27.58%)464(26.91%)417(28.37%)387(27.03%)
Mostly satisfied422(24.20%)425(24.65%)345(23.47%)350(24.44%)
Highly satisfied82(4.70%)87(5.05%)72(4.90%)76(5.31%)
Total1744172414701432
6 months after treatment
Dissatisfied364(20.87%)353(20.48%)296(20.36%)279(19.82%)
Mostly dissatisfied376(21.56%)379(21.98%)310(21.32%)313(22.23%)
Partly satisfied459(26.32%)450(26.10%)394(27.10%)369(26.21%)
Mostly satisfied464(26.61%)458(26.57%)383(26.34%)375(26.63%)
Highly satisfied81(4.64%)84(4.87%)71(4.88%)72(5.11%)
Total1744172414541408
9 months after treatment
Dissatisfied341(19.55%)342(19.84%)271(18.81%)263(18.99%)
Mostly dissatisfied357(20.47%)341(19.78%)288(19.99%)271(19.57%)
Partly satisfied443(25.40%)442(25.64%)372(25.82%)353(25.49%)
Mostly satisfied503(28.84%)499(28.94%)421(29.22%)407(29.39%)
Highly satisfied100(5.73%)100(5.80%)89(6.18%)91(6.57%)
Total1744172414411385
12 months after treatment
Dissatisfied340(19.50%)354(20.53%)267(18.68%)274(20.01%)
Mostly dissatisfied335(19.21%)328(19.03%)266(18.61%)253(18.48%)
Partly dissatisfied399(22.88%)372(21.58%)323(22.60%)277(20.23%)
Mostly satisfied538(30.85%)549(31.84%)455(31.84%)457(33.38%)
Highly satisfied132(7.57%)121(7.02%)118(8.26%)108(7.89%)
Total1744172414291369
Follow-up
Dissatisfied269(18.50%)268(19.20%)257(18.11%)257(18.90%)
Mostly dissatisfied277(19.05%)236(16.91%)275(19.38%)231(16.99%)
Partly satisfied302(20.77%)288(20.63%)295(20.79%)284(20.88%)
Mostly satisfied467(32.12%)472(33.81%)457(32.21%)460(33.82%)
Highly satisfied139(9.56%)132(9.46%)135(9.51%)128(9.41%)
Total1454139614191360
TABLE 72 — test of different observations (10 th question)
FASPP
ItemsTest methodStatisticP valueStatisticP value
BaselineRank-sum test0.260.7940−0.100.9211
1 month afterRank-sum test0.650.51400.470.6390
treatment
3 months afterRank-sum test0.230.81470.310.7579
treatment
6 months afterRank-sum test0.170.86440.190.8489
treatment
9 months afterRank-sum test0.100.92190.230.8173
treatment
12 months afterRank-sum test−0.390.7000−0.240.8140
treatment
Follow-upRank-sum test0.530.59660.520.6009
TABLE 73 — different observations (11 th question)
FASPP
ItemsControl groupTrial groupControl groupTrial group
Baseline
Continuously worried167(9.59%)144(8.38%)138(9.21%)120(8.30%)
Often worried416(23.88%)421(24.51%)376(25.10%)364(25.19%)
Occasionally worried713(40.93%)720(41.91%)619(41.32%)604(41.80%)
Seldom Worried374(21.47%)377(21.94%)306(20.43%)309(21.38%)
No worried72(4.13%)56(3.26%)59(3.94%)48(3.32%)
Total1742171814981445
1 month after treatment
Continuously worried117(6.71%)115(6.67%)90(6.04%)94(6.50%)
Often worried365(20.93%)339(19.66%)324(21.76%)290(20.04%)
Occasionally worried714(40.94%)694(40.26%)614(41.24%)576(39.81%)
Seldom worried466(26.72%)488(28.31%)389(26.12%)412(28.47%)
No worried82(4.70%)88(5.10%)72(4.84%)75(5.18%)
Total1744172414891447
3 months after treatment
Continuously worried94(5.39%)86(4.99%)68(4.62%)66(4.61%)
Often worried319(18.29%)306(17.75%)280(19.03%)251(17.53%)
Occasionally worried714(40.94%)696(40.37%)610(41.47%)572(39.94%)
Seldom worried532(30.50%)544(31.55%)443(30.12%)465(32.47%)
No worried85(4.87%)92(5.34%)70(4.76%)78(5.45%)
Total1744172414711432
6 months after treatment
Continuously worried77(4.42%)60(3.48%)50(3.44%)41(2.91%)
Often worried259(14.85%)274(15.89%)212(14.57%)216(15.33%)
Occasionally worried727(41.69%)686(39.79%)621(42.68%)555(39.39%)
Seldom worried595(34.12%)601(34.86%)502(34.50%)513(36.41%)
No worried86(4.93%)103(5.97%)70(4.81%)84(5.96%)
Total1744172414551409
9 months after treatment
Continuously worried60(3.44%)50(2.90%)35(2.43%)29(2.09%)
Often worried215(12.33%)209(12.12%)169(11.73%)151(10.90%)
Occasionally worried729(41.80%)722(41.88%)611(42.40%)575(41.52%)
Seldom worried635(36.41%)634(36.77%)538(37.34%)534(38.56%)
No worried105(6.02%)109(6.32%)88(6.11%)96(6.93%)
Total1744172414411385
12 months after treatment
Continuously worried55(3.15%)48(2.78%)28(1.96%)27(1.97%)
Often worried161(9.23%)182(10.56%)114(7.98%)122(8.91%)
Occasionally worried708(40.60%)668(38.75%)580(40.59%)512(37.40%)
Seldom worried696(39.91%)712(41.30%)601(42.06%)610(44.56%)
No worried124(7.11%)114(6.61%)106(7.42%)98(7.16%)
Total1744172414291369
Follow-up
Continuously worried20(1.38%)24(1.72%)19(1.34%)23(1.69%)
Often worried98(6.74%)104(7.45%)97(6.84%)103(7.58%)
Occasionally worried566(38.93%)527(37.75%)551(38.83%)513(37.75%)
Seldom worried642(44.15%)622(44.56%)628(44.26%)605(44.52%)
No worried128(8.80%)119(8.52%)124(8.74%)115(8.46%)
Total1454139614191359
(1) Formulation
Radix Astragali86.5 g
Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae21.3 g
Radix Notoginseng
3.5 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae20.6 g
Adjuvant PEG-600030 g
Radix Astragali40.6 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae44.8 g
Radix Notoginseng
11.2 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae38.6 g
Adjuvant PEG-600030 g.
Radix Astragali77.3 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae22.8 g
Radix Notoginseng
4.8 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae30.5 g
Adjuvant PEG-600028 g.
Radix Astragali40.3 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae39.2 g
Radix Notoginseng
8.2 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae46.8 g
Adjuvant PEG-600025 g.
Radix Astragali36.5 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae32.4 g
Radix Notoginseng
6.2 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae41.7 g
Adjuvant PEG-600022 g.
Radix Astragali65.2 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae38.9 g
Radix Notoginseng
9.3 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae32.5 g
Adjuvant PEG-600040 g.
Radix Astragali56.2 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae32.5 g
Radix Notoginseng
6.2 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae41.6 g
Adjuvant PEG-600022 g.
Formulation
Radix Astragali86.5 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae21.3 g
Radix Notoginseng
3.5 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae20.6 g
Formulation
Radix Astragali65.5 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae25.8 g
Radix Notoginseng
9.5 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae46.4 g
Formulation
Radix Astragali35.5 g
Radix salvia Miltiorrhizae50.8 g
Radix Notoginseng
16.3 g
Lignum Dalbergiae Odoriferae52.3 g

Claims as granted

19 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K36/482
  • A61K36/258
  • A61K36/00
  • A61K36/48
  • A61K36/481
  • A61K36/537

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.5 y
1,631 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Qiuwen Mi
art unit 1655 · TC 1600
Citations: 25 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom201620182020202220242026202820302032Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock