USPatent applicationPatented

Accurate auto-focus method

Granted 12 Aug 2014 · no office action yet

Current assignee: POLIGHT TECHNOLOGIES LTD. · originally Foxconn Technology Group

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Kuo-Hung Lin · Examiner: Joseph P Martinez · AU 2872 · TC 2800

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An auto focus method includes: assigning searching boundaries L=InitL, R=InitR, and acquiring the resolutions f(L), f(R); defining the focused positions X 1 , X 2 by the golden section method, and acquiring the resolution f(X 1 ), f(X 2 ); determining whether or not f(X 1 ) is greater than f(X 2 ); moving L adjacent to R when f(x1) is less than f(x2); moving R adjacent to L when f(x1) is greater than f(x2); acquiring the focused positions L, x1, x2, and R, and the resolution of the focused positions when L≠InitL and R≠InitR; acquiring an optimal focus point according to the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R, and the resolution of the focused positions.

Description

3 parts
›BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to auto-focus technologies, and particularly to an auto-focus method capable of accurately finding a focused position.

2. Description of Related Art

Auto-focus methods are used in a camera to find a focused position. An auto-focus method utilizes a mountain climbing algorithm, in which a focusing lens of the camera is driven to make a step by step global search. The image resolution of the lens at each step is acquired to plot a curve of the image resolution relative to the step of the focusing lens, and then the step associated with the highest image resolution is taken as the focused position. However, if there is a slightly shake occurring during the focusing, the curve may distort, disabling the mountain climbing algorithm to find the real highest image contrast and resulting in an inaccurate focusing result.

Therefore, it is desirable to provide an auto-focus method, which can overcome the limitations described.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional schematic view of a lens module in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of an auto-focus method in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of calculating an optimal focused position of the auto-focus method of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 4 is a coordinate graph of a resolution value and a current value of the auto-focus method of FIG. 1 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings.

Referring to FIG. 1 , an auto-focus method, according to an exemplary embodiment, is used in an electronic device, such as camera and telephone, including a lens module 100 . The lens module 100 includes a focusing lens 10 and a motor 20 for driving the focusing lens 10 to move within a focus range of the lens module 100 . A resolution (i.e. contrast) of an image captured by the lens module 100 is changed with a position of the focusing lens 10 .

Referring to FIGS. 2-4 , the auto-focus method may be implemented by software modules encoded via a program language, such as C++ or hardware constructed to have the corresponding function. In the former case, the software modules can be stored in a memory and run by a processor. The auto-focus method includes steps S 11 -S 18 .

In step S 11 : searching boundaries InitL, InitR of a searching range of the focusing lens 10 are represented by L, R. The resolutions of images captured by the lens module 100 are represented by f(L), f(R) when the focusing lens 10 positioned on the two searching boundaries InitL, InitR respectively. Wherein L and R are variables, InitL and InitR are constants. f(X) is the resolution of the image captured by the lens module 100 when the focusing lens 10 positioned on a focused position X, wherein X is a variable greater than InitL and lower than InitR. The focused position X is a current value used for driving the motor 20 . The searching boundaries InitL, InitR are determined according to the designed requirements of the lens module 100 . In this embodiment, L=InitL=0.2A, R=InitR=2A, f(L)=0.07, and f(R)=0.07.

In step S 12 : two focused positions X 1 , X 2 are defined by a golden section method, wherein X 1 =L+(1−τ)×(R−L), X 2 =L+τ×(R−L), and τ=0.618. f(X 1 ) and f(X 2 ) are the resolution of the images captured by the lens module 100 when the focusing lens 10 positioned on the focused positions X 1 , X 2 . Wherein X 1 and X 2 are variables. In the embodiment, X 1 =0.8696, X 2 =1.3124, f(X 1 )=0.19, f(X 2 )=0.15.

In step S 13 : f(X 1 ) is compared with f(X 2 ) to determine whether or not f(X 1 ) is greater than f(X 2 ) when f(X 1 ) is lower than f(X 2 ), entering into step S 14 . When f(X 1 ) is greater than f(X 2 ), entering into step S 15 . In the embodiment, f(X 1 ) is greater than f(X 2 ).

In step S 14 : when f(X 1 ) is lower than f(X 2 ), L=X 1 , X 1 =X 2 , and X 2 =L+τ×(R−L). Wherein L≠X 1 represents that X 1 is assigned to L, X 1 =X 2 represents that X 2 is assigned to X 1 , and X 2 =L+τ×(R−L) represents that X 2 is defined via reassigned L.

In step S 15 : when f(X 1 ) is greater than f(X 2 ), R=X 2 , X 2 =X 1 , and X 1 =L+(1−τ)×(R−L). Wherein R=X 2 represents that X 2 is assigned to R, X 1 =X 2 represents that X 2 is assigned to X 1 , and X 1 =L+(1−τ)×(R−L) represents that X 1 is defined via reassigned R. In the embodiment, R=1.3124, X 2 =0.8696, and X 1 =0.6138.

In step S 16 : L≠InitL and R≠InitR are determined whether or not are established. When L≠InitL and R≠InitR are unestablished, returning to step S 13 . In this embodiment, as the value of L is unchanged, L≠InitL and R≠InitR are unestablished.

In step S 17 : when L≠InitL and R≠InitR are established, the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R and the resolutions f(L), f(X 1 ), f(X 2 ), and f(R) of images captured by the lens module 100 when the focusing lens 10 are positioned on the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R are acquired. It should understand that, the step S 14 and the step S 15 will respectively be run at least one time when L≠InitL and R≠InitR are established.

In step S 18 : an optimal focused position X p is calculated according to the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R and the resolutions f(L), f(X 1 ), f(X 2 ), and f(R). The calculating process comprises the steps:

In step S 181 : three groups of the focused positions and the resolutions are orderly sampled from the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R and the resolutions f(L), f(X 1 ), f(X 2 ), and f(R). Each three groups of the focused positions and the resolutions are substituted into a parabolic equation to calculate a peak coordinate. Therefore, four peak coordinates (X n1 , f(n1)), (X n2 , f(n2)), (X n3 , f(n3)), (X n4 , f(n4)) are calculated.

In step S182: the optimal focused position X p is acquired, wherein X p =(L*f(L)+X 1 *f(X 1 )+X 2 *f(X 2 )+R*f(R)+X n1 *f(n1)+X n2 *f(n2)+X n3 *f(n3)+X n4 *f(n4))/(L+X 1 +X 2 +R+X n1 +X n2 +X n3 +X n4 ).

It should be understood that, the optimal focused position X p can be calculated by other methods, such as X p =(L*f(L)+X 1 *f(X 1 )+X 2 *f(X 2 )+R*f(R))/(L+X 1 +X 2 +R), or X p =(X n1 *f(n1)+X n2 *f(n2)+X n3 *f(n3)+X n4 *f(n4))/(X n1 +X n2 +X n3 +X n4 ) .

The searching boundaries R, L move toward the optimal focused position X p by the golden section method, and the optimal focused position X p is calculated according to the focused positions L, X 1 , X 2 , and R and the resolutions f(L), f(X 1 ), f(X 2 ), and f(R). Therefore, the accuracy of the optimal focused position X p is increased.

Particular embodiments are shown and described by way of illustration only. The principles and the features of the present disclosure may be employed in various and numerous embodiments thereof without departing from the scope of the disclosure as claimed. The above-described embodiments illustrate the scope of the disclosure but do not restrict the scope of the disclosure.

Claims as granted

8 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G02B7/28
  • G02B7/38
USPC · US Patent Classification
359/698

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2013Apr 2013Jul 2013Oct 2013Jan 2014Apr 2014Jul 2014Oct 2014USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.5 y
532 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Joseph P Martinez
art unit 2872 · TC 2800
Citations: 1 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock