USPatent applicationPatented

Chemical mechanical planarization process and structures

Granted 30 Aug 2016 · 6 office actions

Life of the application

22 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom2014201620182020202220242026202820302032ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A semiconductor device includes a substrate having a first and second region, a first structure and a second structure. The first structure is formed over the substrate in the first region. The first structure has a first height. The second structure is formed over the substrate in the second region. The second structure has a second height different from the first height.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to semiconductor devices and includes methods and structures for improving a chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process, which may be used to prepare a region of a semiconductor device for silicide formation.

An important capability for manufacturing reliable integrated circuits is to prevent contact between two structures such that a short does not form. To achieve this isolation, trench structures, such as those used in Shallow Trench Isolation (STI), are formed. These trenches are filled with a dielectric and a CMP process is performed to flatten the surface of the semiconductor device in preparation for the formation of other structures. The CMP process stops when a surface such as a surface of a SiN layer, a mask layer or a substrate is reached however some of the dielectric material from the trenches continues to be removed. This phenomenon is an example of a dishing effect. Thus, structures that are formed over the filled in trenches will be at a lower height than those formed over the substrate, which leads to problems in subsequent processing steps.

›BRIEF SUMMARY

In an embodiment, a semiconductor device includes a substrate having a first and second region, a first structure and a second structure. The first structure is formed over the substrate in the first region. The first structure has a first height. The second structure is formed over the substrate in the second region. The second structure has a second height different from the first height.

In another embodiment, a method of fabricating a semiconductor device includes providing a substrate including a first region and a second region; forming a first structure over the substrate in the first region, the first structure having a first height; and forming a second structure over the substrate in the second region, the second structure having a second height different from the first height.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of an exemplary semiconductor device.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

FIG. 1 shows a semiconductor device 10 including a substrate 12 , which may be silicon. In a first region 14 , the substrate 12 includes a trench 16 . The trench 16 may be formed using an STI process. A second region 18 does not include a trench. The trench 16 is filled in with a dielectric 20 , such as an oxide. A CMP process is then performed to flatten (i.e., planarization) the surface of the semiconductor device. Differences in the materials such as density, hardness, and properties affecting the CMP process cause a dishing effect, which removes excess material from the trench region. That is, an upper surface 22 of the dielectric 20 in the first region 14 corresponding with the trench 16 is lower than a surface 24 of the substrate 12 in the second region 18 .

The trench 16 may be formed, for example, to provide isolation between an dense array region and a less dense periphery region of a memory device. To provide good isolation from the higher voltage signals that may be present in the periphery region, wide trenches may be provided. The wider a trench is, the greater the dishing effect will be.

Following the CMP process, the structures 26 are formed over the dielectric 20 in the first region 14 and the structures 28 are formed over the substrate 12 in the second region 18 . The structures 26 and 28 may include polysilicon layers 30 and 32 formed over oxide layers 34 and 36 respectively. Oxide layers 34 and 36 may be gate oxide layers.

Following the formation of the structures 26 and 28 , a dielectric layer 40 is formed over the structures 26 and 28 .

FIG. 2 shows the semiconductor device 10 of FIG. 1 after a CMP process has been performed to remove excess material from the dielectric layer 40 . The CMP process is selective for polysilicon and stops when the polysilicon layers 32 of the structures 28 are exposed. The structures 26 remain covered by the dielectric layer 40 because they are offset at a lower position due to the dishing effect.

FIG. 3 shows the semiconductor device 10 of FIG. 2 after a silicide process has been performed. Silicide layers 42 are formed on the polysilicon layers 32 of the structures 28 , which were exposed during the silicide process. The silicide layers may be grown on the polysilicon layers and part of the polysilicon layers may be consumed and changed to silicide as part of the silicide process.

However, no silicide was formed on the structures 26 , which were covered by the dielectric layer 40 during the silicide process, leading to defects in the device. A mask and etch process may be used to expose the structures 26 , however a top surface of the structures 26 and 28 would remain at different heights causing additional problems in subsequent processing steps. This approach also requires the additional processing steps to perform the masking and etching. Larger trenches, which may be used to provide increased isolation, lead to an increased dishing effect and an aggravation of this problem.

FIG. 4 shows the semiconductor device 10 of FIG. 2 after an oxidation process, such as an annealing. For example, an oxidation annealing may be performed using O 2 gas and a temperature approximately 1000 C. Plasma oxidation may also be used. The oxidization process oxidizes the exposed polysilicon layers 32 of the structures 28 to form the silicon oxide 50 in the structures 28 . The portion of the polysilicon layers 32 processed into oxide (i.e., the height of the silicon oxide 50 ), can be controlled by controlling various process parameters such as temperature, duration, etc. The portion of the polysilicon layers 32 that is not changed to oxide remains as the polysilicon layers 32 b.

For example, if a height of the structures 28 above the substrate 12 is h 1 and a height of the structures 26 above the upper surface 22 of the dielectric 20 is h 2 , then the ratio of the heights h 2 /h 1 may be approximately 1.1 to 1.5 in some embodiments. In this example, the thickness of the polysilicon oxide 50 may be up to 50% of the height h 2 . In some embodiments, a height h 3 of the silicon oxide 50 is approximately the same as a height h 4 of the dishing effect. The height of the dishing effect is approximately equal to an average height-wise distance between the upper surface 22 of the dielectric 20 and the substrate 12 in the region 18 across the trench 16 . Preferably, a top of the polysilicon layers 32 b and a top of the polysilicon layers 30 are approximately the same distance from the surface 52 of the dielectric layer 40 . However, they are not required to be exactly the same.

FIG. 5 shows the semiconductor device 10 of FIG. 4 after a CMP process has been performed to remove excess material from the dielectric layer 40 as well as the polysilicon oxide 50 of the structures 28 . The CMP process is selective for polysilicon and stops when the polysilicon layers 32 b of the structures 28 and the polysilicon layers 30 of the structures 26 are exposed. Thus, the structures 26 and the structures 28 are exposed by the CMP process.

FIG. 6 shows the semiconductor device 10 of FIG. 5 after a silicide process has been performed. Silicide layers 54 are formed on the polysilicon layers 32 b of the structures 28 and the polysilicon layers 30 of the structures 26 , which were exposed during the silicide process. The silicide layers may be grown on the polysilicon layers and part of the polysilicon layers may be consumed and changed to silicide as part of the silicide process.

It will be appreciated that the structures 26 and 28 described above are merely exemplary and the discussed process may be used with any of a number of underlying structures and applications. As an example, the structures 26 and 28 of FIG. 4 may be used in a logic IC. As another example, FIG. 7 shows the structures 28 b , which may be used in a memory, having polysilicon layers 62 formed over oxide layers 60 . Oxide layers 60 may be tunneling layers. Dielectric layers 64 , which may be laminated layers such as oxide-nitride-oxide (ONO) layers, are formed over the polysilicon layers 62 . Second polysilicon layers 66 may be formed over the dielectric layers 64 and silicide layers 68 may be formed over the second polysilicon layers 66 . As another example, FIG. 8 shows the structures 28 c , which may be used in a memory such as a nitride read-only memory, having dielectric layers 70 formed over the substrate 12 . The dielectric layers 70 may be laminated layers, such as ONO layers. Polysilicon layers 72 are formed over the dielectric layers 70 . Silicide layers 74 may be formed over the polysilicon layers 72 . As still another example, the structures described may also be formed on any semiconductor layer and do not have to be formed directly on a substrate.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

While various embodiments in accordance with the disclosed principles have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and are not limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the invention(s) should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.

Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 C.F.R. 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.

Claims as granted

21 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H01L21/762
  • H01L21/3105
  • H10B69/00
  • H10D62/10

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after finalResponse after non-finalResponse after finalResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.7 y
1,356 days filing → grant
Office actions
6
non-final + final
Responses
6
2 RCE
Examiner
Jerome Jackson, Jr.
art unit 2823 · TC 2800
Citations: 10 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2014201620182020202220242026202820302032Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock