USPatent applicationPatented

Steel continuous casting method

Granted 19 Mar 2013 · no office action yet

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles is disclosed. The method comprises braking a molten steel flow with DC magnetic fields respectively applied to a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring the molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles, the strength of an AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles and strengths of DC magnetic fields applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles are controlled within a particular ranges in accordance with the width of a slab to be cast.

Description

41 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the U.S. National Phase application of PCT International Application No. PCT/JP2010/054287, filed Mar. 9, 2010, and claims priority to Japanese Patent Application Nos. 2009-256707, filed Nov. 10, 2009, and 2010-049972, filed Mar. 7, 2010, the disclosure of both are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a continuous casting method for producing a slab by casting molten steel while controlling a molten steel flow in a mold by electromagnetic force.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In continuous casting of steel, molten steel placed in a tundish is poured into a mold for continuous casting via an immersion nozzle connected to the tundish bottom. In this case, the molten steel flow discharged from a spout of the immersion nozzle to inside a mold is accompanied with non-metallic inclusions (mainly, deoxidization products such as alumina) and bubbles of inert gas (inert gas injected to prevent nozzle clogging caused by adhesion and accretion of alumina and the like) injected from an inner wall surface of an upper nozzle. However, when the non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are entrapped in a solidification shell, product defects (defects originating from inclusions and bubbles) occur. Furthermore, a mold flux (mold powder) is entrained in a molten steel upward flow reaching a meniscus and also becomes trapped in the solidification shell, resulting in product defects.

It has been a conventional practice to apply magnetic fields to the molten steel flow in a mold to control the flow of the molten steel through electromagnetic force of the magnetic fields in order to prevent non-metallic inclusions, mold flux, and bubbles in molten steel from becoming entrapped in a solidification shell and forming product defects. Many proposals have been made regarding this technique.

For example, patent document 1 discloses a method for controlling a molten steel flow by DC magnetic fields respectively applied to a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles that face each other with a mold long-side portion therebetween. According to this method, a molten flow is divided into an upward flow and a downward flow after discharged from a spout of an immersion nozzle, the downward flow is braked with a DC magnetic field in the lower portion, and the upward flow is braked with a DC magnetic field in the upper portion so as to prevent the non-metallic inclusions and mold flux accompanying the molten steel flow from becoming trapped in a solidification shell.

Patent document 2 discloses a method with which a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles are provided to face each other with a mold long side portion therebetween as in patent document 1 and magnetic fields are applied using these poles where (1) a DC magnetic field and an AC magnetic field are simultaneously applied to at least the lower magnetic poles or (2) a DC magnetic field and an AC magnetic field are simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles and a DC magnetic field is applied to the lower magnetic poles. According to this method, the molten steel flow is braked with the DC magnetic field as in patent document 1 while the molten steel is stirred with the AC magnetic field so as to achieve an effect of cleaning non-metallic inclusions and the like at the solidification shell interface.

Patent document 3 discloses a method for braking a molten steel flow by using DC magnetic fields respectively applied to a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and by optionally simultaneously applying an AC magnetic field to the upper magnetic poles, in which the strengths of the DC magnetic fields, the ratio of the strength of the DC magnetic field of the upper electrodes to that of the lower electrodes (and the strength of the upper AC magnetic field, optionally) are controlled within particular numeric ranges. Patent document 4 discloses a technique of producing a continuously cast slab having a graded composition in which the concentration of a particular solute element is higher in a surface layer portion than in the interior of the slab. According to this technique, a DC magnetic field is applied in a direction intersecting the thickness of the slab by using magnetic poles disposed at two stages, i.e., upper and lower stages, so as to increase the concentration of the solute element in the molten steel in an upper pool while a shifting AC magnetic field is simultaneously applied with the DC magnetic field during magnetic field application in an upper portion. However, according to the technique disclosed in patent document 4, the shifting AC magnetic field is applied to induce a flow that eliminates local nonuniformity of the solute concentration.

Patent Document

Patent document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 3-142049

Patent document 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-305353

Patent document 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2008-200732

Patent document 4: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-1501

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 7

Due to the increased stringency in quality requirement for steel sheets for automotive outer panels, the defects originating from fine bubbles and entrainment of mold flux which have not been regarded as a problem previously are now increasingly regarded as problematic. Conventional continuous casting methods such as those of the related art described above cannot satisfactorily meet such a stringent quality requirement. In particular, a galvannealed steel sheet is heated after hot-dipping to diffuse the iron component of the base steel sheet into a zinc coating layer and the surface properties of the base steel sheet greatly affect the quality of the galvannealed steel sheet. In other words, when the surface layer of a base steel sheet has defects originating from bubbles and flux, the thickness of a coating layer becomes uneven irrespective of how small the defects are, and the unevenness appears as band-like defects in the surface, thereby rendering the steel sheet unsuitable for usage, such as automotive outer panels, where the quality requirement is stringent.

Aspects of the present invention address the aforementioned problems of the related art and provide a continuous casting method with which a high-quality slab having not only few defects originating from non-metallic inclusions and mold flux which have conventionally been regarded as problems but also few defects caused by entrapment of fine bubbles and mold flux. Note that the aspects of the present invention do not basically encompass slabs having graded compositions such as those described in patent document 4. This is because the number of flux defects will increase when a solute element whose concentration is to be graded is added through wires, for example, and this is not suitable for production of a steel sheet required to satisfy stringent surface quality.

The inventors have studied various casting conditions for controlling a molten steel flow in a mold using electromagnetic force to address the problems described above. As a result, it has been found that in a steel continuous casting method in which a molten steel flow is braked with DC magnetic fields respectively applied to a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles that face each other with a mold long side portion therebetween while a molten steel is stirred with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles, a high-quality slab that has not only few defects caused by non-metallic inclusions and mold flux which have conventionally been regarded as problems but also few defects caused by fine bubbles and mold flux can be obtained by optimizing the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles and the strength of the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles in accordance with the width of a slab to be cast and the casting speed.

The reason why a high-quality slab with few defects originating from bubbles and mold flux is obtained by optimization of the casting conditions described above has also been thoroughly studied. As a result, it has been found that the turbulence energy on top surface (involved in generation of a vortex near the surface), a flow velocity of molten steel at the molten steel-solidification shell interface, and a flow velocity on top surface are the factors (primary factors) involved in generation of bubble defects and flux defects, and the optimization of the casting conditions adequately controls the molten steel flow in the mold through these factors, thereby achieving a state in which entrapment of bubbles at the solidification interface and entrainment of mold flux are suppressed. Moreover, it has also been found that by optimizing the amount of inert gas injected from the inner wall of the immersion nozzle and the thickness of the slab to be cast, another factor called a bubble concentration at solidification interface is adequately controlled and the number of bubble defects can be further reduced.

Aspects of the present invention have been made on the basis of these findings and is summarized as follows.

[1] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously (superimposingly) applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 1.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 7

(c) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(i) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

[2] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (h) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

[3] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 1.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 7

(i) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

[4] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

[5] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

[6] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 4 of 7

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

[7] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (c) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.35 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

[8] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) and (b) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

[9] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 5 of 7

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.35 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

[10] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

[11] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

[12] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 6 of 7

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (e) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

[13] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 40° or more and less than 55° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to more than 0.27 T and 0.35 T or less, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (g) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 2.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 2.75 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 2.65 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 2.45 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(e) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 2.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 2.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 2.15 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min

[14] A steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles,

characterized in that the immersion nozzle, the molten steel spout of which has a molten steel discharge angle of 15° or more and less than 40° downward with respect to a horizontal direction, is used at an immersion depth (distance from a meniscus to an upper end of the molten steel spout) of 180 mm or more and less than 300 mm, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to more than 0.27 T and 0.35 T or less, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T, and continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (h) below in accordance with slab width:

(a) When a slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 2.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When a slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 2.75 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When a slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 2.65 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(d) When a slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 2.45 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION · 7 of 7

(e) When a slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 2.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(f) When a slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 2.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(g) When a slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 2.15 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(h) When a slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 2.05 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

[15] The continuous casting method according to any one of [1] to [14] above, characterized in that the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles and the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles are automatically controlled with a computer for control by determining an AC current value to be fed to an AC magnetic field coil of the upper magnetic poles and each of DC current values to be fed to DC magnetic field coils of the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles by using a preliminarily set table or a mathematical formula on the basis of a width of a slab to be cast, the casting speed, the molten steel discharge angle of the molten steel spout downward with respect to the horizontal direction and the immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of the immersion nozzle, and feeding an AC current and DC currents accordingly.

[16] The continuous casting method according to any one of [1] to [15] above, characterized in that the molten steel in the mold has a turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0035 m 2 /s 2 , a flow velocity on top surface: 0.30 m/s or less, and a flow velocity at a molten steel-solidification shell interface: 0.08 to 0.20 m/s.

[17] The continuous casting method according to [16] above, characterized in that the turbulence energy on top surface of the molten steel in the mold is 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 .

[18] The continuous casting method according to [16] or [17] above, characterized in that the flow velocity on top surface of the molten steel in the mold is 0.05 to 0.30 m/s.

[19] The continuous casting method according to any one of [16] to [18] above, characterized in that the flow velocity of the molten steel in the mold is 0.14 to 0.20 m/s at the molten steel-solidification shell interface.

[20] The continuous casting method according to any one of [16] to [19] above, characterized in that a ratio A/B of a flow velocity A at the molten steel-solidification shell interface to a flow velocity on top surface B of the molten steel in the mold is 1.0 to 2.0.

[21] The continuous casting method according to any one of [16] to [20] above, characterized in that a bubble concentration of the molten steel in the mold is 0.01 kg/m 3 or less at the molten steel-solidification shell interface.

[22] The continuous casting method according to [21] above, characterized in that a thickness of a slab to be cast is 220 to 300 mm and an amount of inert gas blown from an inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle is 3 to 25 NL/min.

According to aspects of the present invention, a high-quality cast slab with very few defects caused by fine bubbles and flux defects which have not been regarded as problems can be obtained by optimizing the strengths of DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper and lower magnetic poles and the strength of an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles in accordance with the width of a slab to be cast and the casting speed, in controlling a molten steel flow in a mold through electromagnetic force. Accordingly, a galvannealed steel sheet that has a high-quality coating layer not achieved by the related art can be produced.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic graph showing “slab width-casting speed” regions (I) to (III) where DC magnetic fields and AC magnetic fields of different strengths are applied, in accordance with aspects of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a vertical cross-sectional view showing one embodiment of a mold and an immersion nozzle of a continuous caster used in implementing aspects of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a horizontal cross-sectional view of the mold and the immersion nozzle of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 .

FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view showing one embodiment of upper magnetic poles equipped with a magnetic pole for a DC magnetic field and a magnetic pole for an AC magnetic field that are independent from each other used in the continuous caster used for implementing aspects of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between a molten steel discharge angle of the immersion nozzle and the incidence (defect index) of surface defects.

FIG. 6 is a conceptual diagram showing a turbulence energy on top surface, a flow velocity at solidification interface (flow velocity at the molten steel-solidification shell interface), a flow velocity on top surface, and a bubble concentration at solidification interface (bubble concentration at the molten steel-solidification shell interface) of molten steel in a mold.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing the relationship between a turbulence energy on top surface of the molten steel in the mold and a flux entrainment ratio.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing the relationship between a flow velocity on top surface of the molten steel in the mold and a flux entrainment ratio.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing the relationship between a flow velocity at solidification interface (flow velocity at molten steel-solidification shell interface) of the molten steel in the mold and an entrapped bubble ratio.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing the relationship between a ratio A/B of a flow velocity at solidification interface A to a flow velocity on top surface B of the molten steel in the mold and a surface defect incidence.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing the relationship between a bubble concentration at solidification interface (bubble concentration at molten steel-solidification shell interface) and an entrapped bubble ratio of the molten steel in the mold.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 12

According to a continuous casting method of the present invention, a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles is used. Using this continuous caster, continuous casting of steel is conducted, when a molten steel flow is braked with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles.

The inventor has studied the above-described continuous casting method through numerical simulation and the like. As a result, it has been found that a turbulence energy on top surface (involved in generation of a vortex near the surface), a flow velocity of molten steel at the molten steel-solidification shell interface (hereinafter simply referred to as “flow velocity at solidification interface”), and a flow velocity on top surface are the factors (primary factors) involved in generation of bubble defects and flux defects, and that these factors affect generation of defects. In particular, it has also been found that the flow velocity on top surface and the turbulence energy on top surface affect entrainment of mold flux and the flow velocity at solidification interface affects the bubble defects. Based on these findings, actions of the DC magnetic fields and the AC magnetic field to be applied and the interaction observed when the two magnetic fields are simultaneously applied have been studied. The following points became clear.

(1) When an AC magnetic field is caused to act near a meniscus, the flow velocity at solidification interface is increased, the cleaning effect is enhanced, and the number of bubble defects is reduced on one hand. However, on the other hand, the flow velocity on top surface and the turbulence energy on top surface are increased and this enhances the entrainment of mold flux and increases the number of flux defects.

(2) When a DC magnetic field is applied to the upper magnetic poles, an upward flow of molten steel (upward flow generated by reversal of a jet flow from the motel steel spout, the reversal being caused by collision with a mold short side) is braked, and the flow velocity on top surface and the turbulence energy on top surface can be reduced. However, the flow velocity on top surface, the turbulence energy on top surface, and the flow velocity at solidification interface cannot be controlled to an ideal state merely by such a DC magnetic field.

(3) In view of the above, simultaneous application of the AC magnetic field and the DC magnetic field at the upper magnetic poles can be considered to be effective in preventing both the bubble defects and the flux defects. However, a sufficient effect is not obtained merely by simultaneously applying the two magnetic fields. The casting conditions (the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed), the application conditions for the AC magnetic field, and the application conditions for the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles are interrelated and optimum ranges exist for these.

Aspects of the present invention are based on such findings and has made it possible to effectively suppress generation of bubble defects and flux defects by optimizing the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles and the strength of the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles in accordance with the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed.

In aspects of the present invention, it has been found that the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles and the strength of the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles should basically be optimized as in (I) to (III) below in accordance with the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed. FIG. 1 is a schematic graph showing “slab width-casting speed” (horizontal axis-vertical axis) regions (I) to (III).

(I) “Slab width-casting speed” region in which the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are relatively small and the upper limit for the casting speed decreases with an increase in width of the slab to be cast: The jet flow velocity from the molten steel spout of an immersion nozzle is small and the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is not readily interfered with an upward flow (reverse flow). Accordingly, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is decreased and the strength of the DC magnetic field (upper magnetic poles) for braking the upward flow is also decreased. As a result, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface are controlled within adequate ranges and generation of the bubble defects and flux defects is prevented.

(II) “Slab width-casting speed” region in which the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are in a small-large range but the upper limit and the lower limit for the casting speed decrease with an increase in width of the slab to be cast: The jet flow velocity from the molten steel spout of an immersion nozzle is relatively large and thus the upward flow (reverse flow) is also increased and the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is readily interfered with the upward flow. Accordingly, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is increased and the strength of the DC magnetic field (upper magnetic poles) for braking the upward flow is also increased. As a result, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface are controlled within adequate ranges and generation of the bubble defects and flux defects is prevented.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 12

(III) “Slab width-casting speed” region in which the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are relatively large and the lower limit for the casting speed increases with a decrease in width of the slab to be cast: The jet flow velocity from the molten steel spout of an immersion nozzle is particularly large and thus the upward flow (reverse flow) is also increased greatly and the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is readily interfered with the upward flow. However, increasing the strength of the AC magnetic field has little effect. Accordingly, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is decreased and the strength of the DC magnetic field (upper magnetic poles) for braking the upward flow is increased. In such a case, the flow velocity at solidification interface is adjusted to be in an adequate range by using a nozzle jet flow, and the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are controlled within adequate ranges by braking the upward flow with the DC magnetic field, to prevent generation of the bubble defects and flux defects.

FIGS. 2 and 3 show one embodiment of a mold and an immersion nozzle of a continuous caster used in implementing aspects of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the mold and the immersion nozzle and FIG. 3 is a horizontal cross-sectional view (cross-sectional view taken along line in FIG. 2 ) of the mold and the immersion nozzle. In the drawings, reference numeral 1 denotes a mold. The mold 1 has a rectangular horizontal cross-section constituted by mold long side portions 10 (mold side wall) and mold short side portions 11 (mold side wall). Reference numeral 2 denotes an immersion nozzle. Molten steel in a tundish (not shown) provided above the mold 1 is poured into the mold 1 through this immersion nozzle 2 . The immersion nozzle 2 has a bottom 21 at the lower end of a cylindrical nozzle main body and a pair of molten steel spouts 20 are formed to penetrate the side wall portion above the bottom 21 so as to face the two mold short side portions 11 .

In order to prevent nozzle clogging caused by adhesion and deposition of the non-metallic inclusions such as alumina in the molten steel onto an inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle 2 , inert gas such as Ar gas is introduced into a gas channel (not shown) provided inside the nozzle main body of the immersion nozzle 2 or inside an upper nozzle (not shown) and the inert gas is blown into the nozzle from the nozzle inner wall surface. The molten steel that has flown into the immersion nozzle 2 from the tundish is discharged into the mold 1 from the pair of molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 . The discharged molten steel is cooled in the mold 1 to form a solidification shell 5 and continuously withdrawn downward from the mold 1 to form a slab. A mold flux is added to a meniscus 6 in the mold 1 and used as a thermal insulation material for the molten steel and a lubricant between the solidification shell 5 and the mold 1 . Bubbles of the inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle 2 or inside the upper nozzle are discharged into the mold 1 from the molten steel spouts 20 along with the molten steel.

A pair of upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and a pair of lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b that face each other with the mold long side portions therebetween are provided on the outer sides of the mold 1 (back surfaces of the mold side wall). The upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b extend in the width direction of the mold long side portions 10 along the entire width. The upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b are arranged so that the molten steel spouts 20 are positioned, in a vertical direction of the mold 1 , between the peak position of the DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b (the peak position in the vertical direction: usually the center position of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b in the vertical direction) and the peak position of the DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b (the peak position in the vertical direction: usually the center position of the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b in the vertical direction). The pair of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is usually located at positions that cover the meniscus 6 .

DC magnetic fields are respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b and an AC magnetic field is simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b . Thus, the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b are usually each equipped with a magnetic pole for a DC magnetic field and a magnetic pole for an AC magnetic field that are independent from each other (each of the magnetic poles is constituted by an iron core and a coil). As a result, each of the strengths of the DC magnetic field and the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied can be freely selected. FIG. 4 is a plan view schematically showing one embodiment of such upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b . A pair of magnetic poles 30 a and 30 b for an AC magnetic field (=AC magnetic field generator) is disposed on the outer sides of the two mold long side portions of the mold 1 and a pair of magnetic poles 31 a and 31 b for an DC magnetic field (=DC magnetic field generator) is disposed on the further outer sides thereof.

Each of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b may include a coil for a DC magnetic field and a coil for an AC magnetic field for a common iron core. When such a coil for DC magnetic field and a coil for an AC magnetic field that can be controlled independently are provided, each of the strengths of the DC magnetic field and the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied can be freely selected. In contrast, the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b are each constituted by an iron core and a coil for a DC magnetic field.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 3 of 12

The AC magnetic field applied simultaneously with the DC magnetic field may be an AC oscillating magnetic field or an AC shifting magnetic field. An AC oscillating magnetic field is a magnetic field generated by feeding AC currents having phases substantially reversed from each other to adjacent coils or by feeding AC currents having the same phase to the coils having winding directions opposite from each other so that the magnetic fields generated from the adjacent coils have substantially reversed phases. An AC shifting magnetic field is a magnetic field obtained by feeding AC currents having phases shifted by 360°/N to arbitrarily selected N adjacent coils. Usually, N=3 (phase difference: 120°) is employed to achieve high efficiency.

The molten steel discharged from the molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 in the mold short side portion direction collides with the solidification shell 5 generated at the front of the mold short side portions 11 and divided into a downward flow and an upward flow. DC magnetic fields are respectively applied to the pair of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the pair of the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b and the basic effects achieved by these magnetic poles are that the molten steel upward flow is braked (decelerated) with the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the molten steel downward flow is braked (decelerated) with the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b due to the electromagnetic force acting on the molten steel moving in the DC magnetic fields. The AC magnetic field simultaneously applied with the DC magnetic field to the pair of the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b forcibly stirs the molten steel at the meniscus and, the molten steel flow caused thereby achieves an effect of cleaning the non-metallic inclusions and bubbles at the solidification shell interface. Here, when the AC magnetic field is an AC shifting magnetic field, an effect of rotating and stirring the molten steel in a horizontal direction can be achieved.

According to aspects of the present invention, the casting conditions are selected in accordance with the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 (the distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spouts) and the molten steel discharge angle α (see FIG. 2 ) of the molten steel spouts 20 downward with respect to the horizontal direction. The nozzle immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 300 mm and the molten steel discharge angle α of the molten steel spouts 20 downward with respect to the horizontal direction is 15° or more (preferably 25° or more) and less than 55°. Adequate control of the molten steel flow becomes difficult when the nozzle immersion depth is too large or too small since the state of flow of the molten steel in the mold changes significantly as the amount and speed of the flow of the molten steel discharged from the immersion nozzle 2 change. When the nozzle immersion depth is less than 180 mm, the molten steel top surface (meniscus) directly changes as the amount and speed of the flow of the molten steel discharged from the immersion nozzle 2 change, the turbulence in the surface becomes significant, and entrainment of mold flux occurs readily. In contrast, when the depth is 300 mm or more, the speed of the downward flow increases by the change in amount of the flow of the molten steel and thus submersion of non-metallic inclusions and bubbles tends to become significant.

When the molten steel discharge angle α is 55° or more, non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are carried downward in a mold by the molten steel downward flow and become readily entrapped in the solidification shell despite braking of the molten steel downward flow with the DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b . In contrast, at a molten steel discharge angle α less than 15°, the turbulence in the molten steel top surface cannot be controlled adequately and entrainment of mold flux easily occurs even when the molten steel upward flow is braked with the DC magnetic field. Further, in view of the above, a more preferable lower limit for the molten steel discharge angle α is 25° and a more preferable upper limit is 35°. FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the molten steel discharge angle α (horizontal axis: °) of the immersion nozzle and the incidence (defect index: vertical axis) of surface defects. In the studies shown in FIG. 5 , a continuous casting test was conducted under various conditions that satisfy the ranges of the present inventions regarding the magnetic field strengths, the nozzle immersion depth, the casting speed, and the slab width in the regions (I) to (III) described below; the resulting slab continuously cast was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to form a steel sheet; and the steel sheet was galvannealed to investigate the influence of the molten steel discharge angle α on occurrence of surface defects. Evaluation of the surface defects was conducted as follows. The galvannealed steel sheet described above was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects, and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. The number of defects per 100 m of the coil length was evaluated by the following standard to determine the surface defect index:

3: The number of defects was 0.30 or less.

2: The number of defects was more than 0.30 and 1.00 or less.

1: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

The casting speed is preferably 0.95 m/min or more from the productivity standpoint but adequate control is difficult at a casting speed of 3.05 m/min or more even according to aspects of the present invention. Thus, the casting speed of 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min is a range encompassed by the present invention. The minimum slab width cast by continuous casting is generally about 700 mm. A method of adding a solute element to a molten steel during casting in order to obtain a slab having a graded composition between the slab surface layer portion and the interior as disclosed in patent document 4 is not preferred since flux defects are likely to occur due to wires and the like for adding the solute element.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 4 of 12

According to aspects of the present invention, the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b and the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b are optimized under the casting conditions (I) to (III) described above in accordance with the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed so as to control the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface in adequate ranges and to suppress entrainment of mold flux into the solidification shell 5 and entrapment of fine bubbles (mainly bubbles of inert gas blown from inside the upper nozzle) that cause the flux defects and bubble defects.

The casting conditions in regions (I), (II), and (III) will now be described in the order of (II), (I), and (III).

Casting Conditions in Region (II)

In a “Slab width-casting speed” region, such as a region (II) shown in FIG. 1 , where the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are in a low-high, small-large range but the upper limit and the lower limit for the casting speed decrease with an increase in width of the slab to be cast, the jet flow velocity from the molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 is relatively large and thus the upward flow (reverse flow) is also increased and the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is readily interfered with the upward flow. Accordingly, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is increased and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b for braking the upward flow is also increased. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T. As a result, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface can be controlled within adequate ranges.

When the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is less than 0.060, the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is readily interfered with the upward flow. Then the flow velocity at solidification interface cannot be increased stably, and bubble defects readily occur. In contrast, when the strength of the AC magnetic field exceeds 0.090 T, force of stirring the molten steel becomes excessively strong and thus the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of mold flux occur readily.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is less than 0.18 T, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel upward flow is insufficient. Accordingly, the bath surface is significantly fluctuated, and the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of mold flux occur readily. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.35 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel upward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is less than 0.30 T, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel downward flow is insufficient, and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles accompanying the molten steel downward flow are submerged in the downward direction and readily trapped in the solidification shell. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.45 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel downward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

However, the flow state of the molten steel in the mold greatly changes according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α of the molten steel spouts 20 downward with respect to the horizontal direction. In other words, the smaller the nozzle immersion depth is, it is the more likely that the molten steel top surface (meniscus) will be influenced by the flow state of the molten steel discharged from the immersion nozzle 2 . In contrast, the larger the nozzle immersion depth is, it is more likely that the larger the downward flow velocity is. As the molten steel discharge angle α is increased, the molten steel downward flow is increased compared to the molten steel upward flow and the opposite results when the molten steel discharge angle α is decreased. Since the flow state of the molten steel changes significantly as such according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α, the ranges of the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed, i.e., the range of the region (II) schematically shown in FIG. 1 also changes accordingly. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T in the ranges (range of the region (II)) of the slab width and the casting speed in accordance with the immersion depth and the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 as in (II-1) to (II-6) below.

(II-1) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 5 of 12

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 1.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(i) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(II-2) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (h) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(II-3) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 1.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(i) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(II-4) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm.

(a) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

(II-5) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm.

(a) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 6 of 12

(b) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

(II-6) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (i) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 2.85 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.95 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 1.25 m/min or more and less than 2.75 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 1.15 m/min or more and less than 2.65 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 1.05 m/min or more and less than 2.45 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.35 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.25 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.15 m/min.

(i) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.05 m/min.

Casting Conditions in Region (I)

In a “slab width-casting speed” region, such as region (I) in FIG. 1 , where the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are relatively small and the upper limit for the casting speed decreases with an increase in width of the slab to be cast, the jet flow velocity from the molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 is small and the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is not readily interfered with an upward flow (reverse flow). Accordingly, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is decreased and the strength of the DC magnetic field (upper magnetic poles) applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b for braking the upward flow is also decreased. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.020 or more and less than 0.060 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T. As a result, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface can be controlled within adequate ranges.

When the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is less than 0.020 T, the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is readily interfered with the upward flow. Then the flow velocity at solidification interface cannot be increased stably, and bubble defects readily occur. In contrast, when the strength of the AC magnetic field is 0.060 T or more, force of stirring the molten steel becomes excessively strong and thus the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of mold flux occur readily.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is less than 0.05 T, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel upward flow force is insufficient. Accordingly, the bath surface is significantly fluctuated, and the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of the mold flux occur readily. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.27 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel upward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is less than 0.30 T, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel downward flow is insufficient, and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles accompanying the molten steel downward flow are submerged in the downward direction and readily trapped in the solidification shell. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.45 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel downward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

However, the flow state of the molten steel in the mold greatly changes according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α of the molten steel spouts 20 downward with respect to the horizontal direction. In other words, the smaller the nozzle immersion depth is, it is the more likely that the molten steel top surface (meniscus) will be influenced by the flow state of the molten steel discharged from the immersion nozzle. In contrast, the larger the nozzle immersion depth is, it is more likely that the larger the downward flow velocity is. As the molten steel discharge angle α is increased, the molten steel downward flow is increased compared to the molten steel upward flow and the opposite results when the molten steel discharge angle α is decreased. Since the flow state of the molten steel changes significantly as such according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α, the ranges of the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed, i.e., the range of the region (I) schematically shown in FIG. 1 also changes accordingly. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T in the ranges (range of the region (I)) of the slab width and the casting speed in accordance with the immersion depth and the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 as in (I-1) to (I-6) below.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 7 of 12

(I-1) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (c) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.35 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

(I-2) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) and (b) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

(I-3) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.35 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

(I-4) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 240 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(I-5) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (d) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 240 mm or more and less than 270 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(I-6) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (e) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 270 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is less than 950 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 950 mm or more and less than 1050 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 2.85 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.25 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.15 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 0.95 m/min or more and less than 1.05 m/min.

Casting Conditions in Region (III)

In a “slab width-casting speed” region, such as a region (III) in FIG. 1 , where the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed are relatively large and the lower limit for the casting speed increases with a decrease in width of the slab to be cast, the jet flow velocity from the molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 is particularly large and thus the upward flow (reversed flow) is also significantly large, thereby the large flow velocity at interface is induced. Accordingly, in order to suppress interference with the swirling flow, the swirling magnetic field strength is adjusted. The strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is decreased and the strength of the DC magnetic field (upper magnetic poles) applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b for braking the upward flow is increased. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to more than 0.27 T and 0.35 T or less, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T. As a result, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface can be controlled within adequate ranges.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 8 of 12

Here, when the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is less than 0.020 T, the swirling flow generated by the AC magnetic field is readily interfered with the upward flow. Then the flow velocity at solidification interface cannot be increased stably, and bubble defects readily occur. In contrast, when the strength of the AC magnetic field is 0.060 T or more, force of stirring the molten steel becomes excessively strong and thus the turbulence energy on top surface and the flow velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of mold flux occur readily.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is 0.27 T or less, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel upward flow force is insufficient. Accordingly, the bath surface is significantly fluctuated, and the turbulence energy on top surface and the velocity on top surface are increased. Then the flux defects caused by entrainment of the mold flux occur readily. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.35 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel upward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

When the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is less than 0.30 T, the effect of the DC magnetic field of braking the molten steel downward flow is insufficient, and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles accompanying the molten steel downward flow are submerged in the downward direction and readily trapped in the solidification shell. In contrast, when the strength of the DC magnetic field exceeds 0.45 T, the cleaning effect of the molten steel downward flow is decreased and thus non-metallic inclusions and bubbles are readily trapped in the solidification shell.

However, the flow state of the molten steel in the mold greatly changes according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α of the molten steel spouts 20 downward with respect to the horizontal direction. In other words, the smaller the nozzle immersion depth is, it is the more likely that the molten steel top surface (meniscus) will be influenced by the flow state of the molten steel discharged from the immersion nozzle. In contrast, the larger the nozzle immersion depth is, it is more likely that the larger the downward flow velocity is. As the molten steel discharge angle α is increased, the molten steel downward flow is increased compared to the molten steel upward flow and the opposite results when the molten steel discharge angle α is decreased. Since the flow state of the molten steel changes significantly as such according to the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 and the molten steel discharge angle α, the ranges of the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed, i.e., the range of the region (III) schematically shown in FIG. 1 also changes accordingly. In particular, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b is set to more than 0.27 T and 0.35 T or less, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T in the ranges (range of the region (III)) of the slab width and the casting speed in accordance with the immersion depth and the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 as in (III-1) and (III-2) below.

(III-1) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (g) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 40° or more and less than 55° and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 2.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 2.75 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 2.65 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 2.45 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 2.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 2.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(g) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 2.15 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(III-2) The case when continuous casting is conducted at casting speeds (a) to (h) below in accordance with the slab width while the molten steel discharge angle α of the immersion nozzle 2 is 15° or more and less than 40° (preferably 25° or more and less than 40° and more preferably 25° to 35°) and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle 2 is 180 mm or more and less than 300 mm.

(a) When the slab width is 1050 mm or more and less than 1150 mm, the casting speed is 2.95 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(b) When the slab width is 1150 mm or more and less than 1250 mm, the casting speed is 2.75 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(c) When the slab width is 1250 mm or more and less than 1350 mm, the casting speed is 2.65 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(d) When the slab width is 1350 mm or more and less than 1450 mm, the casting speed is 2.45 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(e) When the slab width is 1450 mm or more and less than 1550 mm, the casting speed is 2.35 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(f) When the slab width is 1550 mm or more and less than 1650 mm, the casting speed is 2.25 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 9 of 12

(g) When the slab width is 1650 mm or more and less than 1750 mm, the casting speed is 2.15 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

(h) When the slab width is 1750 mm or more and less than 1850 mm, the casting speed is 2.05 m/min or more and less than 3.05 m/min.

As described above, when the strength of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b and the lower magnetic poles 4 a and 4 b and the strength of the AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the upper magnetic poles 3 a and 3 b are optimized in accordance with the width of the slab to be cast and the casting speed, the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface, which are the factors involved in generation of bubble defects and flux defects (factor involved in the molten steel flow in the mold) are adequately controlled. Thus, a state in which entrapment of bubbles in the solidification interface and entrainment of mold flux rarely occur can be realized and a high-quality slab having few defects originating from bubbles and mold flux can be obtained. The continuous casting method of the present invention described above can also be regarded as three continuous casting methods (A) to (C) below according to the regions (I) to (III) described above.

(A) In a steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.060 to 0.090 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.18 to 0.35 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T when continuous casting is conducted under any one of previously discussed conditions (II-1) to (II-6) (ranges of the slab widths and casting speed in accordance with the molten steel discharge angle α and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle).

(B) In a steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.05 to 0.27 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T when continuous casting is conducted under any one of previously discussed conditions (I-1) to (I-6) (ranges of the slab widths and casting speed in accordance with the molten steel discharge angle α and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle).

(C) In a steel continuous casting method using a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on outer sides of a mold, the upper magnetic poles facing each other with a mold long side portion therebetween and the lower magnetic poles facing each other with the mold long side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles while stirring a molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles, a strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to 0.020 T or more and less than 0.060 T, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is set to more than 0.27 T and 0.35 T or less, a strength of a DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles is set to 0.30 to 0.45 T when continuous casting is conducted under any one of previously discussed conditions (III-1) and (III-2) (ranges of the slab widths and casting speed in accordance with the molten steel discharge angle α and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle).

In implementing aspects of the present invention, the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles and the strengths of the DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles are preferably automatically controlled with a computer for control by determining an AC current value to be fed to an AC magnetic field coil of an upper magnetic pole and DC current values to be fed to DC magnetic field coils of the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles by using at least one of a preliminarily set table and a mathematical formula on the basis of the width of the slab to be cast, the casting speed, and the molten steel discharge angle of the molten steel spouts downward with respect to the horizontal direction and the immersion depth of the immersion nozzle (the distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout). Further, the casting conditions, based on which the current values are determined, may include the slab thickness and the amount of inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 10 of 12

FIG. 6 is a conceptual diagram showing the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface (flow velocity at the molten steel-solidification shell interface), the flow velocity on top surface, and the bubble concentration at solidification interface (bubble concentration at the molten steel-solidification shell interface) of molten steel in a mold. The turbulence energy on top surface (indicated by the second balloon from the top in FIG. 6 ) of the molten steel is a spatial average value of a k value determined from the formula below and defined by a numerical flow simulation using a three dimensional k-E model defined by fluid dynamics. Here, the molten steel discharge angle of the immersion nozzle, the nozzle immersion depth, and the inert gas (e.g., Ar) blowing rate considering volume expansion should be considered. For example, when the inert gas blowing rate is 15 NL/min, the volume expansion ratio is 6. In other words, the numerical analysis model is a model that considers a momentum, a continuity equation, and a k-E model of turbulent flow coupled with a field Lorentz force and the lifting effect of nozzle blowing. (Based on the description of a two equation model on p. 129—of Non-patent document: “Handbook of Computational Fluid Dynamics” (published Mar. 31, 2003))

k = 1 2 ⁢ ( v X ′ ⁢ ⁢ 2 _ + v Y ′ ⁢ ⁢ 2 _ + v Z ′ ⁢ ⁢ 2 _ ) [ Math . ⁢ 1 ]

Where

v′ X =δv X /δt

v′ Y =δv Y /δt

v′ Z =δv Z /δt

v X : Flow velocity (m/s) in X direction at molten steel top surface (bath surface)

v Y : Flow velocity (m/s) in Y direction at molten steel top surface (bath surface)

v Z : Flow velocity (m/s) in Z direction at molten steel top surface (bath surface)

The flow velocity at solidification interface (molten steel flow velocity at the molten steel-solidification shell interface) (indicated by the second balloon from the bottom in FIG. 6 ) is a spatial average value of the molten steel flow velocity at a position 50 mm below the meniscus and having a solid fraction fs of 0.5. Dependency of molten steel viscosity on temperature in addition to a latent heat of solidification and heat transfer should be considered in the flow velocity at solidification interface. The detailed calculation conducted by the present inventors has found that the flow velocity at solidification interface at a solid fraction fs=0.5 is equivalent to a half of the flow velocity determined by dendrite tilt angle measurement (fs=0). In other words, if the calculated flow velocity at solidification interface is 0.1 m/s at fs=0.5, the flow velocity at solidification interface determined on the basis of the dendrite tilt angle (fs=0) of the slab is 0.2 m/s. Note that the flow velocity at solidification interface determined from the dendrite tilt angle (fs=0) of the slab is equal to the flow velocity at solidification interface at a position having a solid fraction fs=0 at the solidification front surface. Here, the dendrite tilt angle is a tilt angle of a primary branch of dendrite extending in a thickness direction from a surface with respect to a normal direction to a slab surface. (Non-patent document: Tetsu-to-Hagane [Iron and Steel], Year 61 (1975), No. 14 “Relation between Large Inclusions and Growth Directions of Columnar Dendrites in Continuously Cast Slabs”, pp. 2982-2990)

The flow velocity on top surface (indicated by the top balloon in FIG. 6 ) is a spatial average value of the molten steel flow velocity at the molten steel top surface (bath surface). This is also defined by the aforementioned three-dimensional numerical analysis model. Here, the flow velocity on top surface is coincident with the drag measured by using an immersed rod. However, according to the present definition, the flow velocity on top surface is an area average position thereof and thus can be calculated by numerical computation. In particular, the numerical analysis of the turbulence energy on top surface, the flow velocity at solidification interface, and the flow velocity on top surface can be conducted as below. For example, the numerical analysis can be accomplished by a general-purpose fluid analysis software Fluent or the like using a model that considers a momentum, a continuity equation, and a turbulent flow model (k-E model) coupled with magnetic field analysis and a gas bubble distribution. (Based on the description of a user's manual of Non-patent document: Fluent 6.3 (Fluent Inc. USA))

The turbulence energy on top surface significantly affects the entrainment of mold flux. As the turbulence energy on top surface increases, entrainment of mold flux is induced, thereby increasing the number of flux defects. In contrast, when the turbulence energy on top surface is too small, the mold flux does not sufficiently form slag. FIG. 7 shows the relationship between the turbulence energy on top surface (horizontal axis: unit m 2 /s 2 ) and the flux entrainment ratio (percentage (%) of the flux entrapped from among flux evenly scattered onto the molten steel surface (top surface) (vertical axis)). Other conditions were as follows: flow velocity at solidification interface: 0.14 to 0.20 m/s, flow velocity on top surface: 0.05 to 0.30 m/s, bubble concentration at solidification interface: 0.01 kg/m 3 or less. According to FIG. 7 , entrainment of mold flux is effectively suppressed and the mold flux satisfactorily forms slag at a turbulence energy on top surface in the range of 0.0020 to 0.0035 m 2 /s 2 . The entrainment of mold flux is particularly suppressed at 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 or less. However, the mold flux does not sufficiently form slag at 0.0020 m 2 /s 2 or less. Accordingly, the turbulence energy on top surface is 0.0020 to 0.0035 m 2 /s 2 and preferably 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 .

The flow velocity on top surface also significantly affects the entrainment of mold flux. Entrainment of mold flux is induced more as the flow velocity on top surface is increased, thereby increasing the number of flux defects. FIG. 8 shows the relationship between the flow velocity on top surface (horizontal axis: unit m/s) and the flux entrainment ratio (percentage (%) of flux entrained from among flux evenly scattered onto the molten steel surface (top surface) (vertical axis)). Other conditions were as follows: turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 , flow velocity at solidification interface: 0.14 to 0.20 m/s, and bubble concentration at solidification interface: 0.01 kg/m 3 or less. According to FIG. 8 , the entrainment of mold flux is effectively suppressed at the flow velocity on top surface of 0.30 m/s or less. Accordingly, the flow velocity on top surface is preferably 0.30 m/s or less. When the flow velocity on top surface is too low, a region in which the temperature of the molten steel top surface is low is generated. Then slag inclusion caused by insufficient melting of mold flux and partial solidification of the molten steel are enhanced, thereby rendering the operation difficult. Accordingly, the flow velocity on top surface is preferably 0.05 m/s or more. The flow velocity on top surface here is a spatial average value at the molten steel top surface and defined by fluid computation. In measurement, an immersion rod is inserted from the top to measure the drag; however, this measurement is conducted only at a particular point and is thus used to verify the calculation described above.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 11 of 12

The flow velocity at solidification interface significantly affects entrapment of bubbles and inclusions in the solidification shell. When the flow velocity at solidification interface is low, bubbles and inclusions are readily trapped in the solidification shell, thereby increasing the number of bubble defects and the like. In contrast, when the flow velocity at solidification interface is excessively high, re-melting of the solidification shell once formed occurs and inhibits growth of the solidification shell. In the worst case, this leads to break-out and shutdown of operation, which poses a serious problem in productivity. FIG. 9 shows the relationship between the flow velocity at solidification interface (horizontal axis: unit m/s) and the entrapped bubble ratio (percentage (%) of bubbles entrapped from among bubbles scattered in the nozzle (vertical axis)). Other conditions were as follows: turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 , flow velocity on top surface: 0.05 to 0.30 m/s, and bubble concentration at solidification interface: 0.01 kg/m 3 or less. According to FIG. 9 , entrapment of bubbles in the solidification shell is effectively suppressed in the range of 0.08 m/s or more of a flow velocity at solidification interface. Further, entrapment of bubbles is particularly little at 0.14 m/s or more. The problem regarding productivity, such as break-out caused by inhibition of growth of the solidification shell does not occur as long as the flow velocity at solidification interface is 0.20 m/s or less, on the other hand. Accordingly, the flow velocity at solidification interface is 0.08 to 0.20 m/s and preferably 0.14 to 0.20 m/s.

A ratio A/B of the flow velocity at solidification interface A to the flow velocity on top surface B affects both entrapment of the bubbles and entrainment of mold flux. The smaller the ratio A/B is, the more likely bubbles and inclusions will be trapped in the solidification shell, resulting in an increase in the number of bubble defects and the like. When the ratio A/B is excessively large, entrainment of mold powder is likely to occur and the number of flux defects is increased. FIG. 10 shows the relationship between the ratio A/B (horizontal axis) and the surface defect incidence (the number of defects per 100 m of a steel strip detected with a surface defect meter (vertical axis)). Other conditions were as follows: turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 , flow velocity on top surface: 0.05 to 0.30 m/s, flow velocity at solidification interface: 0.14 to 0.20 m/s, and bubble concentration at solidification interface: 0.01 kg/m 3 . According to FIG. 10 , the surface quality defect is particularly good at an A/B ratio of 1.0 to 2.0. Accordingly, the ratio A/B of the flow velocity at solidification interface A to the flow velocity on top surface B is preferably 1.0 to 2.0.

Based on the points discussed above, the flow state of the molten steel in a mold is preferably as follows: turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0035 m 2 /s 2 , flow velocity on top surface: 0.30 m/s or less, and flow velocity at the molten steel-solidification shell interface: 0.08 to 0.20 m/s. The turbulence energy on top surface is more preferably 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 , the flow velocity on top surface is more preferably 0.05 to 0.30 m/s and the flow velocity at solidification interface is more preferably 0.14 to 0.20 m/s. The ratio A/B of the flow velocity at solidification interface A to the flow velocity on top surface B is preferably 1.0 to 2.0.

Another factor involved in generation of bubble defects is the bubble concentration at the molten steel-solidification shell interface (hereinafter simply referred to as “bubble concentration at solidification interface”) (indicated by the bottom balloon in FIG. 6 ). When the bubble concentration at solidification interface is adequately controlled, entrapment of bubbles at the solidification interface can be more adequately suppressed. The bubble concentration at solidification interface is defined by the aforementioned numerical calculation as a concentration of bubbles 1 mm in diameter at a position 50 mm below the meniscus and having a solid fraction fs of 0.5. Here, for the purpose of the calculation, the number N of bubbles blown into the nozzle is assumed to be N=AD−5, where A denotes blown gas velocity and D denotes a bubble diameter (Non-patent document: ISIJ Int. Vol. 43 (2003), No. 10, pp. 1548-1555). The blown gas velocity is generally 5 to 20 NL/min.

The bubble concentration at solidification interface significantly affects entrapment of bubbles. When the bubble concentration is high, the amount of bubbles trapped in the solidification shell is increased. FIG. 11 shows the relationship between the bubble concentration at solidification interface (horizontal axis: unit kg/m 3 ) and the entrapped bubble ratio (percentage (%) of bubbles entrapped from among bubbles scattered in the nozzle (vertical axis)). Other conditions were as follows: turbulence energy on top surface: 0.0020 to 0.0030 m 2 /s 2 , flow velocity on top surface: 0.05 to 0.30 m/s, and flow velocity at solidification interface: 0.14 to 0.20 m/s. According to FIG. 11 , the amount of bubbles trapped in the solidification shell is suppressed to a low level at a bubble concentration at solidification interface of 0.01 kg/m 3 or less. Accordingly, the bubble concentration at solidification interface is preferably 0.01 kg/m 3 or less. The bubble concentration at solidification interface can be controlled by the slab thickness to be cast and the amount of inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle. The slab thickness to be cast is preferably 220 mm or more and the amount of the inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle is preferably 25 NL/min or less. The bubble concentration at solidification interface is preferably as low as possible and no particular lower limit is set.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS · 12 of 12

The molten steel discharged from the molten steel spouts 20 of the immersion nozzle 2 is accompanied by bubbles. When the slab thickness is too small, the molten steel flow discharged from the molten steel spouts 20 approaches the solidification shell 5 at the mold long side portion side. Then the bubble concentration at solidification interface is increased, and the bubbles are readily trapped at the solidification shell interface. In particular, when the slab thickness is less than 220 mm, control of the bubble distribution is difficult even by implementing electromagnetic flow control of the molten steel flow as in aspects of the present invention due to the aforementioned reason. In contrast, when the slab thickness exceeds 300 mm, there is a drawback that the productivity of a hot rolling process is decreased. Accordingly, the slab thickness to be cast is preferably 220 to 300 mm.

When the amount of the inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle 2 is increased, the bubble concentration at solidification interface is increased and the bubbles are readily trapped at the solidification shell interface. In particular, when the amount of inert gas blown exceeds 20 NL/min, control of the bubble distribution is difficult even by implementing electromagnetic flow control of the molten steel flow as in aspects of the present invention due to the aforementioned reason. In contrast, when the amount of the inert gas blown is too small, nozzle clogging tends to occur and drift is enhanced. Thus the flow velocity is difficult to be controlled. Accordingly, the amount of the inert gas blown from the inner wall surface of the immersion nozzle 2 is preferably 3 to 25 NL/min. Moreover, when the frequency of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles is adequately increased, the change in flow over time induced by the magnetic field is decreased. Thus, disturbance of the molten steel top surface can be suppressed, the chances that the mold powder will remain unmelted or the chances of fluctuation of the bath surface caused by the disturbance can be reduced, and a higher slab quality can be achieved. In particular, when the frequency is 1.5 Hz or more, unmelted mold powder and the bath surface fluctuation can be significantly reduced. It has also been found that when the frequency is adequately decreased, heating of a mold copper plate or peripheral portions of the copper plate during application of the magnetic field can be suppressed and the chances that the mold is deformed can be reduced. In particular, when the frequency is 5.0 Hz or less, the chances of occurrence of deformation mentioned above are significantly decreased. In view of the above, the frequency is preferably 1.5 Hz or more and 5.0 Hz or less.

›EXAMPLES

About 300 ton of aluminum killed molten steel was cast by a continuous casting method by using a continuous caster shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 , that is, a continuous caster that includes a pair of upper magnetic poles (equipped with DC magnetic field magnetic poles and AC magnetic field magnetic poles that can be independently controlled) and a pair of lower magnetic poles disposed on mold outer sides (back surfaces of mold side walls), both the upper magnetic poles and the lower magnetic poles respectively facing each other with a mold long-side portion therebetween, and an immersion nozzle having a molten steel spout located between a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the upper magnetic poles and a peak position of a DC magnetic field of the lower magnetic poles, the method comprising braking a molten steel flow with DC magnetic fields respectively applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles and the pair of lower magnetic poles and stirring molten steel with an AC magnetic field simultaneously applied to the pair of upper magnetic poles. Ar gas was used as an inert gas blown from the immersion nozzle and the amount of the Ar gas blown was adjusted within the range of 5 to 12 NL/min in accordance with the opening of a sliding nozzle to prevent nozzle clogging.

The specifications of the continuous caster and other casting conditions were as follows.

Shape of molten steel spouts of the immersion nozzle: rectangle 70 mm×80 mm in size.

Immersion nozzle inner diameter: 80 mm

Area of aperture of each molten steel spout of the immersion nozzle: 5600 mm 2

Viscosity of the mold flux used (1300° C.): 0.6 cp

Frequency of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles: 3.3 Hz

›Examples17
›Example 1

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 1 to 3 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 230 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 1 to 3.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 2

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 4 to 6 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 260 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 4 to 6.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 3

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 7 to 9 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 290 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 7 to 9.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 4

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 10 to 12 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 230 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 10 to 12.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 5

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 13 to 15 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 260 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 13 to 15.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 6

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 16 to 18 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 290 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.075 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 16 to 18.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 7

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 19 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 230 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 19.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 8

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 20 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 260 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 20.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 9

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 21 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 290 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 21.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 10

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 22 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 230 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 22.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 11

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 23 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 260 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 23.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 12

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Table 24 by using an immersion nozzle at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 290 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.15 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Table 24.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 13

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 25 and 26 by immersing an immersion nozzle into molten steel in a mold at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 175 to 305 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 45° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 25 and 26.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 14

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions (slab width and casting speed) shown in Tables 27 and 28 by immersing an immersion nozzle into molten steel in a mold at an immersion depth (distance from the meniscus to the upper end of the molten steel spout) of 175 to 305 mm, the immersion nozzle including molten steel spouts each having a molten steel discharge angle of 35° downward from the horizontal direction while adjusting the strength of the AC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.050 T, the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the upper magnetic poles to 0.30 T, and the strength of the DC magnetic field applied to the lower magnetic poles to 0.38 T. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects and defects originating from steel making (flux defects and bubble defects) were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect appearance, SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length. The results are also shown in Tables 27 and 28.

A: The number of defects was 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

›Example 15

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions for applying magnetic fields shown in Tables 29 to 34. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects, and flux defects and bubble defects were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect form (defect appearance), SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length.

AA: The number of defects was 0.30 or less.

A: The number of defects was more than 0.30 and 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

On the basis of these results, the “defects after Zn plating” were comprehensively evaluated as follows.

A: Both flux defects and bubble defects were rated AA or A.

F: At least one of flux defects and bubble defects was rated F.

The results are also shown in Tables 29 to 34.

›Example 16

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions shown in Tables 35 and 36. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects, and flux defects and bubble defects were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect form (defect appearance), SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length.

AA: The number of defects was 0.30 or less.

A: The number of defects was more than 0.30 and 1.00 or less.

F: The number of defects was more than 1.00.

On the basis of these results, the “defects after Zn plating” were comprehensively evaluated as follows.

AA: Both flux defects and bubble defects were rated AA.

A: One of flux defects and bubble defects was rated AA and the other was rated A.

F: At least one of flux defects and bubble defects was rated F.

The results are also shown in Tables 35 to 36.

›Example 17

Continuous casting was conducted under conditions shown in Tables 37 to 39. The slab formed by such continuous casting was hot-rolled and cold-rolled to prepare a steel sheet and the steel sheet was subjected to a galvannealing treatment. The galvannealed steel sheet was analyzed with an on-line surface defect meter to continuously measure surface defects, and flux defects and bubble defects were identified from among the defects on the basis of the defect form (defect appearance), SEM analysis, ICP analysis, etc. Evaluation was conducted by the standard below on the basis of the number of defects per 100 m of the coil length.

AA: The number of defects was 0.30 or less.

A: The number of defects was more than 0.30 and 1.00 or less.

On the basis of these results, the “defects after Zn plating” were comprehensively evaluated as follows. The results are also shown in Tables 37 to 39.

AA: Both flux defects and bubble defects were rated AA.

A: One of flux defects and bubble defects was rated AA and the other was rated A.

According to aspects of the present invention, the problems of the related art are resolved and a high-quality cast slab that has not only very few defects caused by non-metallic inclusions and mold flux which have been regarded as problems in the related art but also very few defects originating from fine bubbles and entrainment of mold flux which have not been regarded as problems before can be obtained by controlling a molten steel flow in a mold by using electromagnetic force. Accordingly, for example, a galvannealed steel sheet having a high-quality coating layer previously not available can be produced.

[Reference Numbers List]

›Tables in the description — 40
TABLE 1
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9001.35A
2Invention Example9001.90A
3Invention Example9002.50A
4Invention Example9003.04A
5Invention Example9452.00A
6Invention Example9452.60A
7Comparative Example9451.30F
8Comparative Example9451.25F
9Invention Example9501.25A
10Invention Example9501.35A
11Invention Example10501.25A
12Invention Example10501.70A
13Invention Example10502.10A
14Invention Example10502.65A
15Invention Example10503.04A
16Invention Example11451.25A
17Invention Example11401.70A
18Invention Example11402.65A
19Invention Example11403.00A
20Comparative Example10501.20F
21Comparative Example11401.20F
22Invention Example11501.25A
23Invention Example11501.70A
24Invention Example11502.60A
25Invention Example11502.94A
26Invention Example12451.25A
27Invention Example12401.70A
28Invention Example12402.60A
29Invention Example12402.94A
30Comparative Example11501.20F
31Comparative Example11503.00F
32Comparative Example11503.05F
33Comparative Example12403.00F
34Invention Example12501.25A
35Invention Example12501.60A
TABLE 2
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
36Invention Example12502.40A
37Invention Example12502.70A
38Invention Example13401.25A
39Invention Example13401.60A
40Invention Example13402.40A
41Invention Example13452.74A
42Comparative Example12501.20F
43Comparative Example13401.20F
44Comparative Example13401.05F
45Comparative Example12502.80F
46Comparative Example13402.80F
47Invention Example13501.05A
48Invention Example13501.50A
49Invention Example13502.30A
50Invention Example13502.64A
51Invention Example14451.05A
52Invention Example14451.50A
53Invention Example14452.30A
54Invention Example14452.60A
55Comparative Example13501.00F
56Comparative Example14451.00F
57Comparative Example13502.70F
58Comparative Example14452.70F
59Invention Example14501.05A
60Invention Example14501.40A
61Invention Example14502.20A
62Invention Example14502.44A
63Invention Example15451.05A
64Invention Example15451.40A
65Invention Example15452.20A
66Invention Example15452.40A
67Comparative Example14501.00F
68Comparative Example15451.00F
69Comparative Example15450.95F
70Comparative Example14502.55F
TABLE 3
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
71Comparative Example15452.50F
72Invention Example15500.95A
73Invention Example15501.30A
74Invention Example15502.10A
75Invention Example15502.30A
76Invention Example16450.95A
77Invention Example16451.30A
78Invention Example16452.10A
79Invention Example16452.34A
80Comparative Example15502.40F
81Comparative Example16452.45F
82Invention Example16500.95A
83Invention Example16501.25A
84Invention Example16501.90A
85Invention Example16502.20A
86Invention Example17400.95A
87Invention Example17401.25A
88Invention Example17401.90A
89Invention Example17452.24A
90Comparative Example16502.30F
91Comparative Example16502.35F
92Comparative Example17402.30F
93Invention Example17500.95A
94Invention Example17501.25A
95Invention Example17501.70A
96Invention Example17502.10A
97Invention Example18450.95A
98Invention Example18451.25A
99Invention Example18451.70A
100Invention Example18452.14A
101Comparative Example17502.20F
102Comparative Example17502.25F
103Comparative Example18452.20F
TABLE 4
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9001.25A
2Invention Example10501.25A
3Invention Example10501.70A
4Invention Example10502.10A
5Invention Example10502.65A
6Invention Example10503.04A
7Invention Example11451.25A
8Invention Example11401.70A
9Invention Example11402.65A
10Invention Example11403.00A
11Comparative Example10501.20F
12Comparative Example11401.20F
13Invention Example11501.25A
14Invention Example11501.70A
15Invention Example11502.60A
16Invention Example11502.90A
17Invention Example12401.25A
18Invention Example12401.70A
19Invention Example12402.60A
20Invention Example12452.94A
21Comparative Example11501.20F
22Comparative Example11503.00F
23Comparative Example12403.00F
24Invention Example12501.25A
25Invention Example12501.60A
26Invention Example12502.40A
27Invention Example12502.70A
28Invention Example13401.25A
29Invention Example13401.60A
30Invention Example13402.40A
31Invention Example13452.74A
32Comparative Example12501.20F
33Comparative Example13401.20F
TABLE 5
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
34Comparative Example12502.80F
35Comparative Example13402.80F
36Invention Example13501.25A
37Invention Example13501.50A
38Invention Example13502.30A
39Invention Example13502.60A
40Invention Example14451.25A
41Invention Example14451.50A
42Invention Example14452.30A
43Invention Example14452.64A
44Comparative Example13501.20F
45Comparative Example14451.20F
46Comparative Example14451.05F
47Comparative Example13502.70F
48Comparative Example13502.75F
49Comparative Example14452.70F
50Invention Example14501.05A
51Invention Example14501.40A
52Invention Example14502.20A
53Invention Example14502.40A
54Invention Example15451.05A
55Invention Example15451.40A
56Invention Example15452.20A
57Invention Example15452.44A
58Comparative Example14501.00F
59Comparative Example15451.00F
60Comparative Example14502.55F
61Comparative Example15452.50F
62Invention Example15501.05A
63Invention Example15501.50A
64Invention Example15502.00A
65Invention Example15502.30A
66Invention Example16451.05A
TABLE 6
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
67Invention Example16451.50A
68Invention Example16452.00A
69Invention Example16452.34A
70Comparative Example15501.00F
71Comparative Example16451.00F
72Comparative Example16450.95F
73Comparative Example15502.40F
74Comparative Example15502.45F
75Comparative Example16452.40F
76Invention Example16500.95A
77Invention Example16501.25A
78Invention Example16501.90A
79Invention Example16502.20A
80Invention Example17400.95A
81Invention Example17401.25A
82Invention Example17401.90A
83Invention Example17452.24A
84Comparative Example16502.30F
85Comparative Example16502.35F
86Comparative Example17402.30F
87Invention Example17500.95A
88Invention Example17501.25A
89Invention Example17501.70A
90Invention Example17502.10A
91Invention Example18450.95A
92Invention Example18451.25A
93Invention Example18451.70A
94Invention Example18452.14A
95Comparative Example17502.20F
96Comparative Example17502.25F
97Comparative Example18452.20F
TABLE 7
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9001.35A
2Invention Example9001.70A
3Invention Example9002.10A
4Invention Example9002.65A
5Invention Example9003.00A
6Invention Example9451.35A
7Invention Example9453.04A
8Comparative Example9001.25F
9Comparative Example9451.30F
10Comparative Example9451.25F
11Invention Example9501.25A
12Invention Example9501.70A
13Invention Example9502.60A
14Invention Example9503.00A
15Invention Example11401.25A
16Invention Example11401.70A
17Invention Example11402.60A
18Invention Example11453.04A
19Comparative Example9501.20F
20Invention Example11501.25A
21Invention Example11501.60A
22Invention Example11502.40A
23Invention Example11502.90A
24Invention Example12401.25A
25Invention Example12401.60A
26Invention Example12402.40A
27Invention Example12452.94A
28Comparative Example11501.20F
29Comparative Example12401.20F
30Comparative Example11503.00F
31Comparative Example12403.00F
32Invention Example12501.25A
33Invention Example12501.50A
34Invention Example12502.30A
TABLE 8
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
35Invention Example12502.70A
36Invention Example13401.25A
37Invention Example13401.50A
38Invention Example13402.30A
39Invention Example13452.74A
40Comparative Example12501.20F
41Comparative Example13401.20F
42Comparative Example12502.80F
43Comparative Example12502.95F
44Comparative Example13402.80F
45Invention Example13501.25A
46Invention Example13501.50A
47Invention Example13502.20A
48Invention Example13502.60A
49Invention Example14451.25A
50Invention Example14451.50A
51Invention Example14452.20A
52Invention Example14452.64A
53Comparative Example13501.20F
54Comparative Example14451.20F
55Comparative Example13502.70F
56Comparative Example14452.70F
57Invention Example14501.15A
58Invention Example14501.50A
59Invention Example14502.00A
60Invention Example14502.40A
61Invention Example15451.15A
62Invention Example15451.50A
63Invention Example15452.00A
64Invention Example15452.44A
65Comparative Example14501.10F
66Comparative Example15451.10F
67Comparative Example14502.50F
68Comparative Example14502.65F
TABLE 9
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
69Comparative Example15452.50F
70Invention Example15501.05A
71Invention Example15501.35A
72Invention Example15501.90A
73Invention Example15502.30A
74Invention Example16401.05A
75Invention Example16401.30A
76Invention Example16401.90A
77Invention Example16452.34A
78Comparative Example15501.00F
79Comparative Example16401.00F
80Comparative Example16400.95F
81Comparative Example15502.40F
82Comparative Example16492.40F
83Invention Example16500.95A
84Invention Example16501.25A
85Invention Example16501.70A
86Invention Example16502.20A
87Invention Example17450.95A
88Invention Example17451.25A
89Invention Example17451.70A
90Invention Example17452.24A
91Comparative Example16502.30F
92Comparative Example17452.30F
93Invention Example17500.95A
94Invention Example17501.25A
95Invention Example17501.70A
96Invention Example17502.10A
97Invention Example18450.95A
98Invention Example18451.25A
99Invention Example18451.70A
100Invention Example18452.14A
101Comparative Example17502.20F
102Comparative Example18452.20F
TABLE 10
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9502.85A
2Invention Example9503.00A
3Invention Example10452.90A
4Invention Example10453.04A
5Comparative Example9502.75F
6Comparative Example10452.80F
7Invention Example10501.25A
8Invention Example10501.70A
9Invention Example10502.50A
10Invention Example10502.90A
11Invention Example11401.25A
12Invention Example11401.70A
13Invention Example11402.40A
14Invention Example11452.94A
15Comparative Example10501.20F
16Comparative Example11401.20F
17Comparative Example10503.00F
18Comparative Example11403.00F
19Invention Example11501.15A
20Invention Example11501.50A
21Invention Example11502.20A
22Invention Example11502.70A
23Invention Example12401.15A
24Invention Example12401.50A
25Invention Example12402.30A
26Invention Example12452.74A
27Comparative Example11501.10F
28Comparative Example12401.10F
29Comparative Example11502.80F
30Comparative Example11502.95F
31Comparative Example12402.80F
32Invention Example12501.15A
TABLE 11
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
33Invention Example12501.50A
34Invention Example12502.20A
35Invention Example12502.60A
36Invention Example13401.15A
37Invention Example13401.50A
38Invention Example13402.20A
39Invention Example13452.64A
40Comparative Example12501.10F
41Comparative Example13401.10F
42Comparative Example13400.95F
43Comparative Example12502.75F
44Comparative Example13402.80F
45Invention Example13500.95A
46Invention Example13501.30A
47Invention Example13502.00A
48Invention Example13502.40A
49Invention Example14450.95A
50Invention Example14451.30A
51Invention Example14451.90A
52Invention Example14452.44A
53Comparative Example13502.50F
54Comparative Example13502.65F
55Comparative Example14452.50F
56Invention Example14500.95A
57Invention Example14501.50A
58Invention Example14501.90A
59Invention Example14502.30A
60Invention Example15450.95A
61Invention Example15451.50A
62Invention Example15452.00A
63Invention Example15452.34A
64Comparative Example14502.40F
TABLE 12
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
65Comparative Example15452.45F
66Invention Example15500.95A
67Invention Example15501.35A
68Invention Example15501.90A
69Invention Example15502.20A
70Invention Example16400.95A
71Invention Example16401.30A
72Invention Example16401.90A
73Invention Example16452.24A
74Comparative Example15502.35F
75Comparative Example16452.30F
76Invention Example16500.95A
77Invention Example16501.25A
78Invention Example16501.70A
79Invention Example16502.10A
80Invention Example17450.95A
81Invention Example17451.25A
82Invention Example17451.70A
83Invention Example17452.14A
84Comparative Example16502.20F
85Comparative Example17452.25F
86Invention Example17500.95A
87Invention Example17501.25A
88Invention Example17501.70A
89Invention Example17502.00A
90Invention Example18450.95A
91Invention Example18451.25A
92Invention Example18451.70A
93Invention Example18452.04A
94Comparative Example17502.10F
95Comparative Example18452.15F
TABLE 13
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9502.85A
2Invention Example9503.00A
3Invention Example10452.90A
4Invention Example10453.04A
5Comparative Example9502.75F
6Comparative Example10452.80F
7Invention Example10501.25A
8Invention Example10501.70A
9Invention Example10502.50A
10Invention Example10502.90A
11Invention Example11401.25A
12Invention Example11401.70A
13Invention Example11402.40A
14Invention Example11452.94A
15Comparative Example10501.20F
16Comparative Example11401.20F
17Comparative Example10503.00F
18Comparative Example11403.00F
19Invention Example11501.15A
20Invention Example11501.50A
21Invention Example11502.20A
22Invention Example11502.70A
23Invention Example12401.15A
24Invention Example12401.50A
25Invention Example12402.30A
26Invention Example12452.74A
27Comparative Example11501.10F
28Comparative Example12401.10F
29Comparative Example11502.80F
30Comparative Example11502.95F
31Comparative Example12402.80F
32Invention Example12501.15A
33Invention Example12501.50A
TABLE 14
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
34Invention Example12502.20A
35Invention Example12502.60A
36Invention Example13401.15A
37Invention Example13401.50A
38Invention Example13402.20A
39Invention Example13452.64A
40Comparative Example12501.10F
41Comparative Example13401.10F
42Comparative Example12502.75F
43Comparative Example13402.80F
44Invention Example13501.15A
45Invention Example13501.50A
46Invention Example13502.00A
47Invention Example13502.40A
48Invention Example14451.15A
49Invention Example14451.40A
50Invention Example14451.90A
51Invention Example14452.44A
52Comparative Example13501.05F
53Comparative Example14451.10F
54Comparative Example14450.95F
55Comparative Example13502.50F
56Comparative Example13502.65F
57Comparative Example14452.50F
58Invention Example14500.95A
59Invention Example14501.50A
60Invention Example14501.90A
61Invention Example14502.30A
62Invention Example15450.95A
63Invention Example15451.50A
64Invention Example15452.00A
TABLE 15
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
65Invention Example15452.34A
66Comparative Example14502.40F
67Comparative Example15452.45F
68Invention Example15500.95A
69Invention Example15501.35A
70Invention Example15501.90A
71Invention Example15502.20A
72Invention Example16400.95A
73Invention Example16401.30A
74Invention Example16401.90A
75Invention Example16452.24A
76Comparative Example15502.35F
77Comparative Example16452.30F
78Invention Example16500.95A
79Invention Example16501.25A
80Invention Example16501.70A
81Invention Example16502.10A
82Invention Example17450.95A
83Invention Example17451.25A
84Invention Example17451.70A
85Invention Example17452.14A
86Comparative Example16502.20F
87Comparative Example17452.25F
88Invention Example17500.95A
89Invention Example17501.25A
90Invention Example17501.70A
91Invention Example17502.00A
92Invention Example18450.95A
93Invention Example18451.25A
94Invention Example18451.70A
95Invention Example18452.04A
96Comparative Example17502.10F
97Comparative Example18452.15F
TABLE 16
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9502.85A
2Invention Example9503.00A
3Invention Example10452.90A
4Invention Example10453.04A
5Comparative Example9502.75F
6Comparative Example10452.80F
7Invention Example10501.25A
8Invention Example10501.70A
9Invention Example10502.50A
10Invention Example10502.90A
11Invention Example11401.25A
12Invention Example11401.70A
13Invention Example11402.40A
14Invention Example11452.94A
15Comparative Example10501.20F
16Comparative Example11401.20F
17Comparative Example10503.00F
18Comparative Example11403.00F
19Invention Example11501.25A
20Invention Example11501.50A
21Invention Example11502.20A
22Invention Example11502.70A
23Invention Example12401.25A
24Invention Example12401.50A
25Invention Example12402.30A
26Invention Example12452.74A
27Comparative Example11501.20F
28Comparative Example12401.20F
29Comparative Example11502.80F
30Comparative Example11502.95F
31Comparative Example12402.80F
32Invention Example12501.15A
TABLE 17
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
33Invention Example12501.50A
34Invention Example12502.20A
35Invention Example12502.60A
36Invention Example13401.15A
37Invention Example13401.50A
38Invention Example13402.20A
39Invention Example13452.64A
40Comparative Example12501.10F
41Comparative Example13401.10F
42Comparative Example12502.75F
43Comparative Example13402.80F
44Invention Example13501.05A
45Invention Example13501.50A
46Invention Example13502.00A
47Invention Example13502.40A
48Invention Example14451.05A
49Invention Example14451.40A
50Invention Example14451.90A
51Invention Example14452.44A
52Comparative Example13500.95F
53Comparative Example14451.00F
54Comparative Example13502.50F
55Comparative Example13502.65F
56Comparative Example14452.50F
57Invention Example14500.95A
58Invention Example14501.50A
59Invention Example14501.90A
60Invention Example14502.30A
61Invention Example15450.95A
62Invention Example15451.50A
63Invention Example15452.00A
64Invention Example15452.34A
TABLE 18
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
65Comparative Example14502.40F
66Comparative Example15452.45F
67Invention Example15500.95A
68Invention Example15501.35A
69Invention Example15501.90A
70Invention Example15502.20A
71Invention Example16400.95A
72Invention Example16401.30A
73Invention Example16401.90A
74Invention Example16452.24A
75Comparative Example15502.35F
76Comparative Example16452.30F
77Invention Example16500.95A
78Invention Example16501.25A
79Invention Example16501.70A
80Invention Example16502.10A
81Invention Example17450.95A
82Invention Example17451.25A
83Invention Example17451.70A
84Invention Example17452.14A
85Comparative Example16502.20F
86Comparative Example17452.25F
87Invention Example17500.95A
88Invention Example17501.25A
89Invention Example17501.70A
90Invention Example17502.00A
91Invention Example18450.95A
92Invention Example18451.25A
93Invention Example18451.70A
94Invention Example18452.04A
95Comparative Example17502.10F
96Comparative Example18452.15F
TABLE 19
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.30A
3Invention Example9451.00A
4Invention Example9451.34A
5Comparative Example9001.40F
6Comparative Example9452.80F
7Invention Example9500.95A
8Invention Example9501.20A
9Invention Example11500.95A
10Invention Example11501.20A
11Invention Example13400.95A
12Invention Example13451.24A
13Comparative Example9501.30F
14Comparative Example13401.30F
15Invention Example13500.95A
16Invention Example13501.00A
17Invention Example15400.95A
18Invention Example15451.04A
19Comparative Example13501.10F
20Comparative Example13501.25F
21Comparative Example15401.10F
TABLE 20
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.20A
3Invention Example12000.95A
4Invention Example12001.20A
5Invention Example14400.95A
6Invention Example14451.24A
7Comparative Example9001.30F
8Comparative Example12001.30F
9Comparative Example14401.30F
10Invention Example14500.95A
11Invention Example14501.00A
12Invention Example16400.95A
13Invention Example16451.04A
14Comparative Example14501.10F
15Comparative Example14501.25F
16Comparative Example16401.10F
TABLE 21
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.30A
3Invention Example9450.95A
4Invention Example9451.34A
5Comparative Example9001.40F
6Comparative Example9451.40F
7Invention Example9500.95A
8Invention Example9501.20A
9Invention Example12000.95A
10Invention Example12001.20A
11Invention Example14400.95A
12Invention Example14451.24A
13Comparative Example9501.30F
14Comparative Example12001.30F
15Comparative Example14401.30F
16Invention Example14500.95A
17Invention Example14501.10A
18Invention Example15400.95A
19Invention Example15451.14A
20Comparative Example14501.20F
21Comparative Example15401.20F
22Invention Example15500.95A
23Invention Example15501.00A
24Invention Example16400.95A
25Invention Example16451.04A
26Comparative Example15501.10F
27Comparative Example16401.10F
TABLE 22
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.70A
3Invention Example9002.40A
4Invention Example9003.00A
5Invention Example9450.95A
6Invention Example9451.70A
7Invention Example9452.40A
8Invention Example9453.04A
9Invention Example9500.95A
10Invention Example9501.60A
11Invention Example9502.20A
12Invention Example9502.80A
13Invention Example10400.95A
14Invention Example10401.60A
15Invention Example10402.20A
16Invention Example10452.84A
17Comparative Example9502.90F
18Comparative Example9503.05F
19Comparative Example10402.90F
20Invention Example10500.95A
21Invention Example10501.20A
22Invention Example11400.95A
23Invention Example11451.24A
24Comparative Example10501.30F
25Comparative Example10502.00F
26Comparative Example10502.80F
27Comparative Example11401.30F
28Invention Example11500.95A
29Invention Example11501.10A
30Invention Example13400.95A
31Invention Example13451.14A
32Comparative Example11501.20F
33Comparative Example11501.20F
TABLE 23
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.60A
3Invention Example9002.30A
4Invention Example9003.00A
5Invention Example9450.95A
6Invention Example9451.70A
7Invention Example9452.40A
8Invention Example9453.04A
9Invention Example9500.95A
10Invention Example9501.60A
11Invention Example9502.20A
12Invention Example9502.80A
13Invention Example10400.95A
14Invention Example10401.60A
15Invention Example10402.20A
16Invention Example10452.84A
17Comparative Example9502.90F
18Comparative Example9503.05F
19Comparative Example10402.90F
20Invention Example10500.95A
21Invention Example10501.20A
22Invention Example11400.95A
23Invention Example11451.24A
24Comparative Example10501.30F
25Comparative Example10502.00F
26Comparative Example10502.80F
27Comparative Example11401.30F
28Invention Example11500.95A
29Invention Example11501.10A
30Invention Example14400.95A
31Invention Example14451.14A
32Comparative Example11501.20F
33Comparative Example14401.20F
TABLE 24
Slab widthCasting speedDefects after
No.Type(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example9000.95A
2Invention Example9001.60A
3Invention Example9002.30A
4Invention Example9003.00A
5Invention Example9450.95A
6Invention Example9451.70A
7Invention Example9452.40A
8Invention Example9453.04A
9Invention Example9500.95A
10Invention Example9501.60A
11Invention Example9502.20A
12Invention Example9502.80A
13Invention Example10400.95A
14Invention Example10401.60A
15Invention Example10402.20A
16Invention Example10452.84A
17Comparative Example9502.90F
18Comparative Example9503.05F
19Comparative Example10402.90F
20Invention Example10500.95A
21Invention Example10501.20A
22Invention Example12400.95A
23Invention Example12451.24A
24Comparative Example10501.30F
25Comparative Example10502.00F
26Comparative Example10502.80F
27Comparative Example12401.30F
28Invention Example12500.95A
29Invention Example12501.10A
30Invention Example13400.95A
31Invention Example13451.14A
32Comparative Example12501.20F
33Comparative Example13401.20F
34Invention Example13500.95A
35Invention Example13501.00A
36Invention Example14400.95A
37Invention Example14451.04A
38Comparative Example13501.10F
39Comparative Example14401.10F
TABLE 25
NozzleSlabCastingDefects
immersionwidthspeedafter
No.Typedepth (mm)(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example26011502.95A
2Invention Example26011503.00A
3Invention Example26012402.95A
4Invention Example26012453.04A
5Invention Example23012002.95A
6Invention Example29012002.95A
7Comparative Example17512002.95F
8Comparative Example30512002.95F
9Comparative Example26011502.85F
10Comparative Example26012402.90F
11Comparative Example26012402.75F
12Invention Example26012502.75A
13Invention Example26012503.00A
14Invention Example26013402.75A
15Invention Example26013453.04A
16Invention Example23013002.85A
17Invention Example29013002.85A
18Comparative Example17513002.85F
19Comparative Example30513002.85F
20Comparative Example26012502.70F
21Comparative Example26013402.70F
22Invention Example26013502.65A
23Invention Example26013503.00A
24Invention Example26014402.65A
25Invention Example26014453.04A
26Invention Example23014002.85A
27Invention Example29014002.85A
28Comparative Example17514002.85F
29Comparative Example30514002.85F
30Comparative Example26013502.60F
31Comparative Example26014402.60F
32Comparative Example26014402.55F
33Invention Example26014502.45A
34Invention Example26014503.00A
35Invention Example26015402.45A
36Invention Example26015453.04A
TABLE 26
NozzleSlabCastingDefects
immersionwidthspeedafter
No.Typedepth (mm)(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
37Invention Example23015002.70A
38Invention Example29015002.70A
39Comparative Example17515002.70F
40Comparative Example30515002.70F
41Comparative Example26014502.40F
42Comparative Example26015402.40F
43Invention Example26015502.35A
44Invention Example26015503.00A
45Invention Example26016402.35A
46Invention Example26016453.04A
47Invention Example23016002.70A
48Invention Example29016002.70A
49Comparative Example17516002.70F
50Comparative Example30516002.70F
51Comparative Example26015502.25F
52Comparative Example26016402.30F
53Invention Example26016502.25A
54Invention Example26016503.00A
55Invention Example26017402.25A
56Invention Example26017453.04A
57Invention Example23017002.70A
58Invention Example29017002.70A
59Comparative Example17517002.70F
60Comparative Example30517002.70F
61Comparative Example26016502.20F
62Comparative Example26017402.20F
63Invention Example26017502.15A
64Invention Example26017503.00A
65Invention Example26018402.15A
66Invention Example26018453.04A
67Invention Example23018002.70A
68Invention Example29018002.70A
69Comparative Example17518002.70F
70Comparative Example30518002.70F
71Comparative Example26017502.10F
72Comparative Example26018402.10F
TABLE 27
NozzleSlabCastingDefects
immersionwidthspeedafter
No.Typedepth (mm)(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
1Invention Example26010502.95A
2Invention Example26010503.00A
3Invention Example26011402.95A
4Invention Example26011453.04A
5Invention Example23011002.95A
6Invention Example29011002.95A
7Comparative Example17511002.95F
8Comparative Example30511002.95F
9Comparative Example26010502.85F
10Comparative Example26011402.90F
11Comparative Example26011402.75F
12Invention Example26011502.75A
13Invention Example26011503.00A
14Invention Example26012402.75A
15Invention Example26012453.04A
16Invention Example23012002.95A
17Invention Example29012002.95A
18Comparative Example17512002.95F
19Comparative Example30512002.95F
20Comparative Example26011502.70F
21Comparative Example26012402.70F
22Invention Example26012502.65A
23Invention Example26012503.00A
24Invention Example26013402.65A
25Invention Example26013453.04A
26Invention Example23013002.80A
27Invention Example29013002.80A
28Comparative Example17513002.80F
29Comparative Example30513002.80F
30Comparative Example26012502.55F
31Comparative Example26013402.60F
32Comparative Example26013402.45F
33Invention Example26013502.45A
34Invention Example26013503.00A
35Invention Example26014402.45A
36Invention Example26014453.04A
37Invention Example23014002.80A
38Invention Example29014002.80A
39Comparative Example17514002.80F
40Comparative Example30514002.80F
41Comparative Example26013502.40F
TABLE 28
NozzleSlabCastingDefects
immersionwidthspeedafter
No.Typedepth (mm)(mm)(m/min)Zn plating
42Comparative Example26014402.40F
43Invention Example26014502.35A
44Invention Example26014503.00A
45Invention Example26015402.35A
46Invention Example26015453.04A
47Invention Example23015002.80A
48Invention Example29015002.80A
49Comparative Example17515002.80F
50Comparative Example30515002.80F
51Comparative Example26014502.25F
52Comparative Example26015402.30F
53Invention Example26015502.25A
54Invention Example26015503.00A
55Invention Example26016402.25A
56Invention Example26016453.04A
57Invention Example23016002.70A
58Invention Example29016002.70A
59Comparative Example17516002.70F
60Comparative Example30516002.70F
61Comparative Example26015502.20F
62Comparative Example26016402.20F
63Invention Example26016502.15A
64Invention Example26016503.00A
65Invention Example26017402.15A
66Invention Example26017453.04A
67Invention Example23017002.70A
68Invention Example29017002.70A
69Comparative Example17517002.70F
70Comparative Example30517002.70F
71Comparative Example26016502.10F
72Comparative Example26017402.10F
73Invention Example26017502.05A
74Invention Example26017503.00A
75Invention Example26018402.05A
76Invention Example26018453.04A
77Invention Example23018002.70A
78Invention Example29018002.70A
79Comparative Example17518002.70F
80Comparative Example30518002.70F
81Comparative Example26017502.00F
82Comparative Example26018402.00F
TABLE 29 — Molten
steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefects
angle ofdepth of(T)originating fromOther casting conditions
immersionimmersionStrength ofUpperLowersteel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzleAC magneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
1Invention Example452300.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001000 to 1500
2Invention Example452300.0900.350.45AAA
3Comparative Example452300.0700.300.25AAFF
4Comparative Example452300.0700.300.50AAFF
5Invention Example452300.0700.180.38AAAA
6Comparative Example452300.0700.150.38FAAF
7Comparative Example452300.0700.380.38AAFF
8Invention Example452300.0600.250.38AAAA
9Comparative Example452300.0550.250.38AAFF
10Comparative Example452300.0950.250.38FAAF
11Invention Example452600.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001150 to 1500
12Invention Example452600.0900.350.45AAA
13Comparative Example452600.0700.300.25AAFF
14Comparative Example452600.0700.300.50AAFF
15Invention Example452600.0700.180.38AAAA
16Comparative Example452600.0700.150.38FAAF
17Comparative Example452600.0700.380.38AAFF
18Invention Example452600.0600.250.38AAAA
19Comparative Example452600.0550.250.38AAFF
20Comparative Example452600.0950.250.38FAAF
21Invention Example452900.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001000 to 1500
22Invention Example452900.0900.350.45AAA
23Comparative Example452900.0700.300.25AAFF
24Comparative Example452900.0700.300.50AAFF
25Invention Example452900.0700.180.38AAAA
26Comparative Example452900.0700.150.38FAAF
27Comparative Example452900.0700.380.38AAFF
28Invention Example452900.0600.250.38AAAA
29Comparative Example452900.0550.250.38AAFF
30Comparative Example452900.0950.250.38FAAF
TABLE 30
Molten steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefectsOther
angledepth ofStrength(T)originating fromcasting conditions
of immersionimmersionof ACUpperLowersteel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzlemagneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
1Invention Example352300.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001100 to 1500
2Invention Example352300.0900.350.45AAA
3Comparative Example352300.0700.300.25AAFF
4Comparative Example352300.0700.300.50AAFF
5Invention Example352300.0700.180.38AAAA
6Comparative Example352300.0700.150.38FAAF
7Comparative Example352300.0700.380.38AAFF
8Invention Example352300.0600.250.38AAAA
9Comparative Example352300.0550.250.38AAFF
10Comparative Example352300.0950.250.38FAAF
11Invention Example352600.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001100 to 1500
12Invention Example352600.0900.350.45AAA
13Comparative Example352600.0700.300.25AAFF
14Comparative Example352600.0700.300.50AAFF
15Invention Example352600.0700.180.38AAAA
16Comparative Example352600.0700.150.38FAAF
17Comparative Example352600.0700.380.38AAFF
18Invention Example352600.0600.250.38AAAA
19Comparative Example352600.0550.250.38AAFF
20Comparative Example352600.0950.250.38FAAF
21Invention Example352900.0700.300.30AAAA1.50 to 2.001100 to 1500
22Invention Example352900.0900.350.45AAA
23Comparative Example352900.0700.300.25AAFF
24Comparative Example352900.0700.300.50AAFF
25Invention Example352900.0700.180.38AAAA
26Comparative Example352900.0700.150.38FAAF
27Comparative Example352900.0700.380.38AAFF
28Invention Example352900.0600.250.38AAAA
29Comparative Example352900.0550.250.38AAFF
30Comparative Example352900.0950.250.38FAAF
TABLE 31
Molten steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefectsOther
angledepth ofStrength(T)originating fromcasting conditions
of immersionimmersionof ACUpperLowersteel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzlemagneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
1Invention Example452300.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.201000 to 1300
2Invention Example452300.0580.270.45AAA
3Comparative Example452300.0500.150.25AAFF
4Comparative Example452300.0500.150.50AAFF
5Invention Example452300.0500.050.38AAAA
6Comparative Example452300.0500.040.38FAAF
7Comparative Example452300.0500.300.38AAFF
8Invention Example452300.0200.150.38AAAA
9Comparative Example452300.0150.150.38AAFF
10Comparative Example452300.0650.150.38FAAF
11Invention Example452600.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.201000 to 1300
12Invention Example452600.0580.270.45AAA
13Comparative Example452600.0500.150.25AAFF
14Comparative Example452600.0500.150.50AAFF
15Invention Example452600.0500.050.38AAAA
16Comparative Example452600.0500.040.38FAAF
17Comparative Example452600.0500.300.38AAFF
18Invention Example452600.0200.150.38AAAA
19Comparative Example452600.0150.150.38AAFF
20Comparative Example452600.0650.150.38FAAF
21Invention Example452900.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.201000 to 1300
22Invention Example452900.0580.270.45AAA
23Comparative Example452900.0500.150.25AAFF
24Comparative Example452900.0500.150.50AAFF
25Invention Example452900.0500.050.38AAAA
26Comparative Example452900.0500.040.38FAAF
27Comparative Example452900.0500.300.38AAFF
28Invention Example452900.0200.150.38AAAA
29Comparative Example452900.0150.150.38AAFF
30Comparative Example452900.0650.150.38FAAF
TABLE 32
Molten steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefectsOther
angledepth ofStrength(T)originating fromcasting conditions
of immersionimmersionof ACUpperLowersteel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzlemagneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
1Invention Example352300.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.101000 to 1300
2Invention Example352300.0580.270.45AAA
3Comparative Example352300.0500.150.25AAFF
4Comparative Example352300.0500.150.50AAFF
5Invention Example352300.0500.050.38AAAA
6Comparative Example352300.0500.040.38FAAF
7Comparative Example352300.0500.300.38AAFF
8Invention Example352300.0200.150.38AAAA
9Comparative Example352300.0150.150.38AAFF
10Comparative Example352300.0650.150.38FAAF
11Invention Example352600.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.101000 to 1300
12Invention Example352600.0580.270.45AAA
13Comparative Example352600.0500.150.25AAFF
14Comparative Example352600.0500.150.50AAFF
15Invention Example352600.0500.050.38AAAA
16Comparative Example352600.0500.040.38FAAF
17Comparative Example352600.0500.300.38AAFF
18Invention Example352600.0200.150.38AAAA
19Comparative Example352600.0150.150.38AAFF
20Comparative Example352600.0650.150.38FAAF
21Invention Example352900.0500.150.30AAAA1.00 to 1.101000 to 1300
22Invention Example352900.0580.270.45AAA
23Comparative Example352900.0500.150.25AAFF
24Comparative Example352900.0500.150.50AAFF
25Invention Example352900.0500.050.38AAAA
26Comparative Example352900.0500.040.38FAAF
27Comparative Example352900.0500.300.38AAFF
28Invention Example352900.0200.150.38AAAA
29Comparative Example352900.0150.150.38AAFF
30Comparative Example352900.0650.150.38FAAF
TABLE 33
Molten steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefectsOther
angledepth ofStrength(T)originating fromcasting conditions
of immersionimmersionof ACUpperLowersteel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzlemagneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
1Invention Example452300.0500.300.30AAAA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
2Invention Example452300.0580.350.45AAA
3Comparative Example452300.0500.300.25AAFF
4Comparative Example452300.0500.300.50AAFF
5Invention Example452300.0500.280.38AAAA
6Comparative Example452300.0500.260.38FAAF
7Comparative Example452300.0500.380.38AAFF
8Invention Example452300.0200.300.38AAAA
9Comparative Example452300.0150.300.38AAFF
10Comparative Example452300.0650.300.38FAAF
11Invention Example452600.0500.300.30AAAA
12Invention Example452600.0580.350.45AAA
13Comparative Example452600.0500.300.25AAFF
14Comparative Example452600.0500.300.50AAFF
15Invention Example452600.0500.280.38AAAA
16Comparative Example452600.0500.260.38FAAF
17Comparative Example452600.0500.380.38AAFF
18Invention Example452600.0200.300.38AAAA
19Comparative Example452600.0150.300.38AAFF
20Comparative Example452600.0650.300.38FAAF
21Invention Example452900.0500.300.30AAAA
22Invention Example452900.0580.350.45AAA
23Comparative Example452900.0500.300.25AAFF
24Comparative Example452900.0500.300.50AAFF
25Invention Example452900.0500.280.38AAAA
26Comparative Example452900.0500.260.38FAAF
27Comparative Example452900.0500.380.38AAFF
28Invention Example452900.0200.300.38AAAA
29Comparative Example452900.0150.300.38AAFF
30Comparative Example452900.0650.300.38FAAF
TABLE 34
Molten steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionmagnetic fieldDefectsOther casting
angledepth ofStrength(T)originatingconditions
of immersionimmersionof ACUpperLowerfrom steel makingDefectsCastingSlab
nozzlenozzlemagneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter Znspeedwidth
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
31Invention Example352300.0500.300.30AAAA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
32Invention Example352300.0580.350.45AAA
33Comparative Example352300.0500.300.25AAFF
34Comparative Example352300.0500.300.50AAFF
35Invention Example352300.0500.280.38AAAA
36Comparative Example352300.0500.260.38FAAF
37Comparative Example352300.0500.380.38AAFF
38Invention Example352300.0200.30.0.38AAAA
39Comparative Example352300.0150.300.38AAFF
40Comparative Example352300.0650.300.38FAAF
41Invention Example352600.0500.300.30AAAA
42Invention Example352600.0580.350.45AAA
43Comparative Example352600.0500.300.25AAFF
44Comparative Example352600.0500.300.50AAFF
45Invention Example352600.0500.280.38AAAA
46Comparative Example352600.0500.260.38FAAF
47Comparative Example352600.0500.380.38AAFF
48Invention Example352600.0200.300.38AAAA
49Comparative Example352600.0150.300.38AAFF
50Comparative Example352600.0650.300.38FAAF
51Invention Example352900.0500.300.30AAAA
52Invention Example352900.0580.350.45AAA
53Comparative Example352900.0500.300.25AAFF
54Comparative Example352900.0500.300.50AAFF
55Invention Example352900.0500.280.38AAAA
56Comparative Example352900.0500.260.38FAAF
57Comparative Example352900.0500.380.38AAFF
58Invention Example352900.0200.300.38AAAA
59Comparative Example352900.0150.300.38AAFF
60Comparative Example352900.0650.300.38FAAF
TABLE 35 — Molten steel
dischargeImmersionStrengthStrength of DCDefects
angle ofdepth ofof ACmagnetic field (T)originating fromOther casting conditions
immersionimmersionmag-UpperLowersteel makingDefectsCasting
nozzlenozzleneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter ZnspeedSlab width
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
Re-1Invention Example451800.0700.300.38AAAA1.50 to 2.001200 to 1500
gion2Invention Example452350.0700.300.38AAAAAA
II3Invention Example452400.0700.300.38AAAAAA
4Invention Example452650.0700.300.38AAAAAA
5Invention Example452700.0700.300.38AAAAAA
6Invention Example452950.0700.300.38AAAA
7Comparative451700.0700.300.38FAAF
Example
8Comparative453100.0700.300.38AAFF
Example
9Invention Example351800.0700.300.38AAAA1.50 to 2.001200 to 1500
10Invention Example352350.0700.300.38AAAAAA
11Invention Example352400.0700.300.38AAAAAA
12Invention Example352650.0700.300.38AAAAAA
13Invention Example352700.0700.300.38AAAAAA
14Invention Example352950.0700.300.38AAAA
15Comparative351700.0700.300.38FAAF
Example
16Comparative353100.0700.300.38AAFF
Example
TABLE 36 — Molten steel
dischargeImmersionStrengthStrength of DCDefects
angle ofdepth ofof ACmagnetic field (T)originating fromOther casting conditions
immersionimmersionmag-UpperLowersteel makingDefectsCasting
nozzlenozzleneticmagneticmagneticFluxBubbleafter ZnspeedSlab width
No.Type(°)(mm)field (T)polespolesdefectsdefectsplating(m/min)(mm)
Re-17Invention Example451800.0500.150.38AAAA1.00 to 1.201000 to 1300
gion18Invention Example452350.0500.150.38AAAAAA
I19Invention Example452400.0500.150.38AAAAAA
20Invention Example452650.0500.150.38AAAAAA
21Invention Example452700.0500.150.38AAAAAA
22Invention Example452950.0500.150.38AAAA
23Comparative451700.0500.150.38FAAF
Example
24Comparative453100.0500.150.38AAFF
Example
25Invention Example351800.0500.150.38AAAA1.00 to 1.101000 to 1300
26Invention Example352350.0500.150.38AAAAAA
27Invention Example352400.0500.150.38AAAAAA
28Invention Example352650.0500.150.38AAAAAA
29Invention Example352700.0500.150.38AAAAAA
30Invention Example352950.0500.150.38AAAA
31Comparative351700.0500.150.38FAAF
Example
32Comparative353100.0500.150.38AAFF
Example
Re-33Invention Example451800.0500.300.38AAAA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
gion34Invention Example452950.0500.300.38AAAA
III35Comparative451700.0500.300.38FAAF
Example
36Comparative453100.0500.300.38AAFF
Example
37Invention Example351800.0500.300.38AAAA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
38Invention Example352950.0500.300.38AAAA
39Comparative351700.0500.300.38FAAF
Example
40Comparative353100.0500.300.38AAFF
Example
TABLE 37 — Molten steel
dischargeImmersionFrequencyStrengthStrength of DC
angle ofdepth ofof ACof ACmagnetic field (T)Other casting conditions
immersionimmersionmagneticmagneticUpperLowerDefectsCasting
nozzlenozzlefieldfieldmagneticmagneticafter ZnspeedSlab width
No.Type(°)(mm)(Hz)(T)polespolesplating(m/min)(mm)
Region1Invention Example452301.50.0700.300.38AA1.50 to 2.001200 to 1500
II2Invention Example452303.50.0700.300.38AA
3Invention Example452305.00.0700.300.38AA
4Invention Example452301.00.0700.300.38A
5Invention Example452306.00.0700.300.38A
6Invention Example452601.50.0700.300.38AA
7Invention Example452603.50.0700.300.38AA
8Invention Example452605.00.0700.300.38AA
9Invention Example452601.00.0700.300.38A
10Invention Example452606.00.0700.300.38A
11Invention Example452901.50.0700.300.38AA
12Invention Example452903.50.0700.300.38AA
13Invention Example452905.00.0700.300.38AA
14Invention Example452901.00.0700.300.38A
15Invention Example452906.00.0700.300.38A
16Invention Example352301.50.0700.300.38AA1.50 to 2.001200 to 1500
17Invention Example352303.50.0700.300.38AA
18Invention Example352305.00.0700.300.38AA
19Invention Example352301.00.0700.300.38A
20Invention Example352306.00.0700.300.38A
21Invention Example352601.50.0700.300.38AA
22Invention Example352603.50.0700.300.38AA
23Invention Example352605.00.0700.300.38AA
24Invention Example352601.00.0700.300.38A
25Invention Example352606.00.0700.300.38A
26Invention Example352901.50.0700.300.38AA
27Invention Example352903.50.0700.300.38AA
28Invention Example352905.00.0700.300.38AA
29Invention Example352901.00.0700.300.38A
30Invention Example352906.00.0700.300.38A
TABLE 38 — Molten
steelStrength of DC
dischargeImmersionFrequencyStrengthmagnetic field
angle ofdepth ofof ACof AC(T)Other casting conditions
immersionimmersionmagneticmagneticUpperLowerDefectsCasting
nozzlenozzlefieldfieldmagneticmagneticafter ZnspeedSlab width
No.Type(°)(mm)(Hz)(T)polespolesplating(m/min)(mm)
Region I31Invention Example452301.50.0500.150.38AA1.00 to 1.201000 to 1300
32Invention Example452303.50.0500.150.38AA
33Invention Example452305.00.0500.150.38AA
34Invention Example452301.00.0500.150.38A
35Invention Example452306.00.0500.150.38A
36Invention Example452601.50.0500.150.38AA
37Invention Example452603.50.0500.150.38AA
38Invention Example452605.00.0500.150.38AA
39Invention Example452601.00.0500.150.38A
40Invention Example452606.00.0500.150.38A
41Invention Example452901.50.0500.150.38AA
42Invention Example452903.50.0500.150.38AA
43Invention Example452905.00.0500.150.38AA
44Invention Example452901.00.0500.150.38A
45Invention Example452906.00.0500.150.38A
46Invention Example352301.50.0500.150.38AA1.00 to 1.101000 to 1300
47Invention Example352303.50.0500.150.38AA
48Invention Example352305.00.0500.150.38AA
49Invention Example352301.00.0500.150.38A
50Invention Example352306.00.0500.150.38A
51Invention Example352601.50.0500.150.38AA
52Invention Example352603.50.0500.150.38AA
53Invention Example352605.00.0500.150.38AA
54Invention Example352601.00.0500.150.38A
55Invention Example352606.00.0500.150.38A
56Invention Example352901.50.0500.150.38AA
57Invention Example352903.50.0500.150.38AA
58Invention Example352905.00.0500.150.38AA
59Invention Example352901.00.0500.150.38A
60Invention Example352906.00.0500.150.38A
TABLE 39 — Molten
steelImmersionStrength of DC
dischargedepth ofFrequencymagnetic field (T)Other casting conditions
angle ofimmersionof ACStrength ofUpperLowerDefectsCasting
immersionnozzlemagneticAC magneticmagneticmagneticafter ZnspeedSlab width
No.Typenozzle (°)(mm)field (Hz)field (T)polespolesplating(m/min)(mm)
Region61Invention Example452301.50.0500.300.38AA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
III62Invention Example452303.50.0500.300.38AA
63Invention Example452305.00.0500.300.38AA
64Invention Example452301.00.0500.300.38A
65Invention Example452306.00.0500.300.38A
66Invention Example352301.50.0500.300.38AA2.70 to 3.001400 to 1700
67Invention Example352303.50.0500.300.38AA
68Invention Example352305.00.0500.300.38AA
69Invention Example352301.00.0500.300.38A
70Invention Example352306.00.0500.300.38A
1Mold
2Immersion nozzle
3a, 3bUpper magnetic pole
4a, 4bLower magnetic pole
5Solidification shell
6Meniscus
10Mold long side portion
11Mold short side portion
21Immersion nozzle bottom
20Molten steel spout
30a, 30bAC magneticfield magnetic pole
31a, 31bDC magneticfield magnetic pole

Claims as granted

15 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B22D11/041
  • B22D11/115
USPC · US Patent Classification
164/466164/468

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013USPTOApplicantExaminer-initiated interview
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.0 y
1,106 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Kuang Lin
art unit 1735 · TC 1700
Citations: 6 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock