Measurement gap configuration in wireless communication systems with carrier aggregation

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/431,301, entitled “Measurement Gap Configuration in Carrier Aggregations,” filed on Jan. 10, 2011, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.

The disclosed embodiments relate generally to multi-carrier wireless communication systems, and, more particularly, to measurement gap configuration in carrier aggregations.

E-UTRAN is the air interface of 3GPP's Long Term Evolution (LTE) upgrade path for mobile networks. In E-UTRAN mobile networks, the network controls a UE to perform measurement for intra/inter-frequency mobility by using broadcast or dedicated control. For example, in RCC_IDLE state, a UE shall follow the measurement parameters defined for cell reselection specified by the E-UTRAN broadcast. On the other hand, in RCC_CONNECTED state, a UE shall follow the measurement configurations specified by radio resource control (RRC) directed from the E-UTRAN (e.g., as in UTRAN MEASUREMENT_CONTROL).

In single-carrier mobile networks, intra-freq measurement occurs when the current and the target cell operate on the same carrier frequency. FIG. 1A (Prior Art) illustrates an intra-freq measurement scenario. In the example of FIG. 1A , UE 11 is served in a current cell on carrier frequency fc 1 , while the to-be-measured target cell also operates on carrier frequency fc 1 . In such a scenario, UE 11 should be able to carry out such measurements without measurement gaps. This is because the receiver on UE 11 is able to measure reference signals on fc 1 while simultaneously performing data communication on the same fc 1 .

On the other hand, inter-freq measurement occurs when the target cell operates on a different carrier frequency as compared to the current cell. Similarly, inter-RAT (Radio Access Technology) measurement occurs when the target cell operates on a different RAT as compared to the current cell. FIG. 1B (Prior Art) illustrates an inter-freq measurement scenario. In the example of FIG. 1B , UE 12 is served in a current cell on carrier frequency fc 1 , while the to-be-measured target cell operates on a different carrier frequency fc 2 . In such a scenario, UE 12 should not be able to carry out measurements without measurement gaps. This is because the receiver on UE 12 needs to switch to fc 2 to perform measurements and then switch back to fc 1 to perform data communication.

In multi-carrier mobile networks with carrier aggregation, it is with high probability that a UE is equipped with multiple receivers. Whether the UE needs measurement gap for inter-frequency or inter-RAT measurement depends on the use of its receivers. FIG. 2A (Prior Art) illustrates a scenario where no measurement gap is needed. In the example of FIG. 2A , receiver A is not configured with any component carrier (CC), while receiver B is used to perform data communication over an active CC on fc 2 . Because receiver A is idle, it can be tuned to fc 3 of the target cell, thus UE 21 does not need measurement gap to perform measurements for the target cell. FIG. 2B (Prior Art) illustrates a scenario where measurement gap is needed. In the example of FIG. 2B , UE 22 uses receiver A to perform data communication over an active CC on fc 1 , and uses receiver B to perform data communication over another active CC on fc 2 . Because both receivers are occupied, UE 22 needs measurement gap to perform inter-frequency measurements for the target cell, which operates on a different carrier frequency fc 3 .

In LTE/LTE-A systems, a UE may report the need for measurement gap (MG) to its serving eNB as part of UE capability. Based on the UE capability report, the eNB configures for MG on per-UE basis. In general, in a first scenario, if at least one receiver is not configured with a component carrier, then the UE may not need MG for inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements. In a second scenario, if all receivers are occupied for data transmission, then the UE may need MG for inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements. Under current MG reporting and configuration, however, the eNB has no information to distinguish between the first and the second scenarios. Besides, with current MG signaling, MG configuration is per-UE basis. Once MG is configured to a UE with multiple receivers, the network does not expect data transmission on all receivers of the UE. In other words, all receivers in the UE should apply the same MG configuration, causing significant UE throughput decrease. On the other hand, if a UE is not configured with MG (but the UE actually needs MG to perform measurements), then the UE should perform inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements only in DRX mode, causing non-up-to-date measurement results and possibly handover delay.

In order to maintain effective and efficient system operation, it is desirable for a UE to accurately report its need of measurement gap to an eNB. It is also desirable for the eNB to properly configure the UE with measurement gap according to its need.

A method of measurement gap reporting and configuration is provided. In a mobile network, a UE receives a capability enquiry message from a serving base station. The UE comprises one or more radio frequency modules that support a list of frequency bands and a list of carrier aggregation (CA) band combinations. In response to the enquiry, the UE transmits capability information containing measurement parameters to the base station. In one embodiment, the measurement parameters comprise need-for-gap parameters for each frequency band and each CA band combinations associated with a list of to-be-measured frequency bands of target cells. In another embodiment, the measurement parameters comprises pairs of need-for-gap parameters, each pair indicates whether the UE needs measurement gap in CA mode and non-CA mode. In yet another embodiment, the measurement parameters comprises need-for-gap parameters per configured component carrier (CC) and the number of to-be-measured frequency bands of each corresponding configured CC.

Based on the reported measurement parameters, the eNB transmits a measurement configuration message to the UE. In one example, the configuration message contains a gap offset that determines a measurement gap reception period (MGRP) and a frame/subframe location for performing measurements. In another example, the configuration message configures a measurement gap for the UE with CC identities. The UE then transmits a measurement gap application message back to the base station. The measurement gap application message indicates whether the UE applies MG for each configured CC. In one example, the UE reports its MG application of each configured CC when the measurement configuration changes or when CC changes (e.g., when CC is added, modified, or released). The eNB may optionally transmit a confirmation message in response to the measurement gap application message. The confirmation message either confirms or rejects the MG application reported by the UE. Finally, the UE applies MG based on the confirmation message.

Other embodiments and advantages are described in the detailed description below. This summary does not purport to define the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.

The accompanying drawings, where like numerals indicate like components, illustrate embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 1A (Prior Art) illustrates an intra-freq measurement scenario.

FIG. 1B (Prior Art) illustrates an inter-freq measurement scenario.

FIG. 2A (Prior Art) illustrates a scenario where no measurement gap is needed.

FIG. 2B (Prior Art) illustrates a scenario where measurement gap is needed.

FIG. 3 illustrates a mobile network with measurement gap reporting and configuration in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 4 illustrates a procedure of reporting and configuring measurement gap between a UE and an eNB in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 5 illustrates a first embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of the first embodiment of reporting measurement parameters.

FIG. 7 illustrates a second embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 8 illustrates one example of the second embodiment of reporting measurement parameters.

FIG. 9 illustrates a third embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect.

FIG. 10 illustrates several triggering conditions of reporting measurement parameters in a mobile network.

FIG. 11 illustrates several embodiments of measurement gap configuration and application in a mobile network.

FIG. 12 illustrates the scheduling of a UE after measurement gap configuration and application.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart of a method of measurement gap reporting, configuration, and application in accordance with one novel aspect.

Reference will now be made in detail to some embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 3 illustrates a mobile network 300 with measurement gap reporting and configuration in accordance with one novel aspect. Mobile network 300 comprises a user equipment UE 301 and a serving base station eNB 302 . UE 301 comprises memory 310 , a processor 311 , a measurement gap reporting and application module 312 , a first radio frequency module 313 (RF# 1 ) coupled to antenna 314 , and a second radio frequency module 315 (RF# 2 ) couple to antenna 316 . Similarly, eNB 302 comprises memory 320 , a processor 321 , a measurement gap configuration module 322 , a first RF module 323 (RF# 1 ) coupled to antenna 324 , and a second RF module 325 (RF# 2 ) couple to antenna 326 .

In E-UTRAN mobile networks, the network controls a UE to perform measurement for intra/inter-frequency mobility by using broadcast or dedicated control. In multi-carrier mobile networks with carrier aggregation (CA), it is with high probability that a UE is equipped with multiple receivers. Whether the UE needs measurement gap (MG) for inter-frequency or inter-RAT measurement depends on the use of its receivers. In one novel aspect, a UE may report the need for MG for all supported frequency bands including CA band combinations to its serving eNB. Based on the UE report, the eNB then configures MG for the UE accordingly.

In the example of FIG. 3 , UE 301 reports measurement parameters (e.g., determined by MG reporting and application module 312 as part of UE capability as depicted by line 341 ) to eNB 302 . The reported measurement parameters includes InterFreq-NeedForGap and InterRAT-NeedForGap information for all supported frequency bands including CA band combinations as depicted in box 331 . Based on the reported measurement parameters, eNB 302 configures measurement gap (e.g., configured by MG configuration module 322 via a measurement configuration message as depicted by line 342 ) for UE 301 . The measurement configuration message includes a GapOffset as depicted in box 332 .

The GapOffset is a MG configuration parameter that determines the measurement gap reception period (MGRP) when MG is configured for a UE. MGRP represents the time of one measurement cycle, reflecting how often the UE performs measurements. For example, a GapOffset gp0 (0..39) corresponds to gap offset of Gap Pattern Id “0” with MGRP=40 ms (e.g., UE performs measurements every 40 ms), and a GapOffset gp1(0..79) means gap Offset of Gap Pattern Id “1” with MGRP=80 ms (e.g., UE performs measurements every 80 ms). The measurement gap itself is equal to 6 ms as defined by the LTE/LTE-A specification. As illustrated in FIG. 3 , if UE 301 is configured with MG, then both receivers # 1 and # 2 of UE 301 perform measurements on target cells during the 6 ms MG every 40 ms or 80 ms MGRP. The GapOffset parameter also determines the system frame number (SFN) and the subframe number that the UE starts to perform measurements based on the following equations:

SFN mod T =FLOOR(gapOffset/10)

subframe=gapOffset mod 10

with T=MGRP/ 10

In one specific example, if GapOffset gp0=35, then MGRP=40ms, T=MGRP/10=4, (SFN mod 4)=FLOOR (35/10)=3, and subframe=35 mod 10=5. That means, the UE will switch its receivers off from the serving cell to perform inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements at subframe 5 on SFN=3, 7, 11, 15 . . . for 6 ms long, and then switch back to the serving cell after inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements, as depicted by FIG. 3 .

FIG. 4 illustrates a procedure of reporting and configuring measurement gap between UE 401 and eNB 402 in accordance with one novel aspect. In step 411 , eNB 402 first transmits a UE capability enquiry message to UE 401 . In response to the capability enquiry message, UE 401 reports UE capability information back to eNB 402 in step 412 . The UE capability information includes measurement parameters. For example, as depicted by box 421 , UE-EUTRA-Capability includes measParameters, which further includes need-for-gap parameters for each supported frequency band (e.g., a bandList) and each supported CA band combination (e.g., a CABandCombinationList). The need-for-gap parameters are associated to a list of inter-frequency bands (e.g., InterFreq-BandList) and a list of inter-RAT bands (e.g., InterRAT-BandList) of the to-be-measured target cells. In step 413 , eNB 402 transmits a measurement configuration message (e.g., RRCConnectionReconfiguration message) to UE 401 . The measurement configuration message includes measurement configuration parameters. For example, as depicted by box 422 , RRCConnectionReconfig includes measConfig, which further includes gp0 or gp1 for measurement configuration parameters (e.g., measGapConfig). The measurement configuration parameters gp0 and gp1 are used to configure the MG for UE 401 . In step 414 , UE 401 transmits an RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete message to eNB 402 after receiving and applying the measurement configuration parameters.

A first issue of measurement gap configuration is for a UE to accurately report its need of measurement gap to an eNB. Because the UE is very likely equipped with multiple receivers, the need of measurement gap depends on the use of its receivers. In general, if at least one receiver is not configured with a component carrier, the UE may not need MG for inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements. On the other hand, if all receivers are occupied for data transmission, the UE may need MG for inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements. Carrier aggregation, however, makes the problem even more complicated. For intra-band carrier aggregation (two component carriers in the same frequency band), a UE may use only one receiver to support an intra-band CA band combination. On the other hand, for inter-band carrier aggregation (two component carriers in different frequency bands), a UE may need to use two receivers to support an inter-band CA band combination. Furthermore, the need for MG may be changed due to the (re)configuration of CA. Therefore, various methods are proposed below for a UE to accurately report measurement parameters to an eNB.

FIG. 5 illustrates a first embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect. Table 501 of FIG. 5 contains measurement parameters (e.g., need-for-gap) for a list of supported frequency bands and a list of supported carrier aggregation (CA) band combinations to be reported by a UE to its eNB. For example, if the UE supports five EUTRA frequency bands (Band 1 to Band 5 in BAND LIST) and three CA band combinations (CA_ 1 C (two component carriers in Band 1 ) and CA_ 1 A- 5 A (one component carrier in Band 1 and one component carrier in Band 5 ) and CA_ 5 C (two component carriers in Band 5 ) in CA BAND COMBINATION LIST), then table 501 contains eight columns, each column corresponds to one of the five frequency bands or one of the three CA band combinations. On the other hand, if the to-be-measured frequency bands for the UE include five inter-frequency LTE bands (Band 1 to Band 5 in INTER-FREQ BAND LIST) and three inter-RAT bands (Band X, Y, and Z in INTER-RAT BAND LIST), then table 501 contains eight rows, each row corresponds to one of the five inter-freq LTE bands or one of the three inter-RAT bands. In one embodiment, each need-for-gap parameter is a Boolean variable having a value of digital zero (0) or one (1). A digital zero indicates that no measurement gap is needed, while a digital one indicates that measurement gap is needed for a specific band associated with a specific to-be-measured band.

FIG. 6 illustrates one specific example of the first embodiment of reporting measurement parameters. In the example of FIG. 6 , a UE supports operation in LTE frequency bands from Band 1 to Band 5 , CA_ 1 C (two component carriers in Band 1 ), CA_ 1 A- 5 A (one component carrier in Band 1 and one component carrier in Band 5 ), and CA_ 5 C (two component carriers in Band 5 ). The UE also supports inter-RAT UTRA frequency bands B 1 , B 2 and B 3 . In this specific example, the UE is equipped with two receivers. One receiver operates in Band 1 , Band 2 , Band 3 , and Band 4 , while the other receiver operates in Band 5 . As a result, the inter-freq/inter-RAT measurement parameters that the UE needs to report to the eNB is depicted by table 601 of FIG. 6 . It can be seen from this example, when the UE operates in Band 5 , the eNB may not need to configure MG for the UE because the UE can measure the inter-freq/inter-RAT by its free receiver supporting operation in Band 1 , Band 2 , Band 3 and Band 4 . When the CA is configured to the UE, whether the UE needs the gap for inter-freq/inter-RAT measurements depends on the UE's reporting on CA band combinations. For example, if CA_ 1 A- 5 A is configured to the UE, i.e., the UE operates in Band 1 and Band 5 simultaneously, then the eNB may need to configure the MG to the UE because no free receiver is available to perform inter-freq/inter-RAT measurement. On the other hand, if CA_ 5 C is configured to the UE, the eNB may not need to configure MG to the UE. With the report of measurement parameters for each frequency band and each CA band combinations associated with a list of to-be-measured frequency bands from a UE, an eNB can decide MG configuration and set the measurement period to the UE more accurately. Thus, the radio resource can be utilized more efficiently.

FIG. 7 illustrates a second embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect. Table 701 of FIG. 7 contains measurement parameters (e.g., need-for-gap) for a list of supported frequency bands to be reported by a UE to its eNB. For example, if the UE supports five EUTRA frequency bands (Band 1 to Band 5 in BAND LIST), then table 701 contains five columns, each column corresponds to one of the five frequency bands. On the other hand, if the to-be-measured frequency bands for the UE include five inter-frequency LTE bands (Band 1 to Band 5 in INTER-FREQ BAND LIST) and three inter-RAT bands (Band X, Y, and Z in INTER-RAT BAND LIST), then table 701 contains eight rows, each row corresponds to one of the five inter-freq LTE bands or one of the three inter-RAT frequency bands.

In the embodiment of FIG. 7 , the measurement parameter format is redefined to contain more than a single need-for-gap parameter. Instead, each need-for-gap parameter may contain a pair of or a trio of Boolean variables, each Boolean variable having a value of digital zero (0) or one (1). A digital zero indicates that no measurement gap is needed, while a digital one indicates that measurement gap is needed. The first Boolean variable is used for UE configured with inter-freq CA mode, the second Boolean variable is used for UE configured with intra-freq CA mode, while the third Boolean variable is used for UE configured with non-CA mode. A trio without filling a value means not available for the corresponding mode. For example, a trio of Boolean values (1, -, 0) indicates that the UE needs measurement gap in inter-freq CA mode, does not support intra-freq CA mode, and does not need measurement gap in non-CA mode.

FIG. 8 illustrates one specific example of the second embodiment of reporting measurement parameters. In the example of FIG. 8 , a UE supports operation in LTE frequency bands from Band 1 to Band 5 , CA_ 1 C (two component carriers in Band 1 ), and CA_ 1 A- 5 A (one component carrier in Band 1 and one component carrier in Band 5 ). The UE also supports inter-RAT UTRA frequency bands B 1 , B 2 and B 3 . In this specific example, the UE is equipped with two receivers. One receiver operates in Band 1 , Band 2 , Band 3 , and Band 4 , while the other receiver operates in Band 5 . As a result, the inter-freq/inter-RAT measurement parameters that the UE needs to report to the eNB is depicted by table 801 of FIG. 8 . With the need-for-gap reported from UE, the eNB may not configure MG for the UE when the UE operates non-CA mode in Band 5 , while the eNB may configure MG for the UE when the UE operates in inter-freq CA mode such as CA_ 1 A- 5 A, i.e., carrier aggregation with one component carrier in Band 1 and one component carrier in Band 5 .

FIG. 9 illustrates a third embodiment of reporting measurement parameters in accordance with one novel aspect. In the example of FIG. 9 , a UE may report the need of measurement gap per configured component carrier (CC) and the number of to-be-measured inter-frequency bands of each corresponding configured CC. As illustrated by table 901 of FIG. 9 , the UE has three implementation scenarios. In scenario 1 , the UE has one configured CC in Band 1 , and the UE does not need measurement gap (e.g., the UE has two receivers, and one is idle). In scenario 2 , the UE have two configured CCs, a first CC 1 in Band 1 and a second CC 2 in Band 5 . For CC 1 , the UE needs measurement gap, and the number of to-be-measured inter-freq bands is equal to five. For CC 2 , the UE also needs measurement gap, and the number of to-be-measured inter-freq bands is equal to four. In scenario 3 , the UE have two configured CCs, a first CC 1 in Band 2 and a second CC 2 in Band 3 . For CC 1 , the UE does not need measurement gap. For CC 2 , the UE needs measurement gap, and the number of to-be-measured inter-freq bands is equal to nine.

If a UE needs MG while the eNB does not configure to the UE properly, then the UE can only perform inter-freq/RAT measurements in discontinuous reception (DRX). However, the measurement requirement imposed by the network may not be satisfied due to the less frequent DRX or not long enough DRX, causing non-up-to-date measurements results and possibly handover delay. On the other hand, once MG is configured to a UE that does not need MG, the network does not expect data transmission on all receivers of the UE. In other words, all receivers in the UE should apply the same MG configuration, causing significant UE throughput decrease. With the measurement parameters report from the UE, the eNB may determine to release or to setup measurement gap and determine the MGRP to the UE more specifically. Take Table 601 of FIG. 6 as an example. The eNB may release the MG configuration to a UE when the CA configuration to the UE is CA_ 5 C. The eNB may setup the MG configuration to the UE when the CA is reconfigured to CA_ 1 A- 5 A.

FIG. 10 illustrates several triggering conditions of reporting measurement parameters in a mobile network comprising a UE 1001 and an eNB 1002 . UE 1001 may report its measurement parameters to eNB 1002 under three triggering conditions. Under a first condition, the UE may report measParameters with both CA and non-CA modes after eNB enquiries. Under a second condition, the UE may report measParameters for CA mode when CA is configured. Under a third condition, when the need for MG is changed, the UE may first trigger the eNB to re-enquiry UE the need of MG. For example, the need for MG may be changed due to the (re)configuration of CA. Upon eNB enquiry, the UE then reports measParameters for both CA and non-CA mode. As illustrated in FIG. 10 , in step 1011 , UE 1001 first transmits a triggering message to eNB 1002 . For example, the triggering message triggers UE capability enquiry when the need for MG is changed due to CA (re)configuration. In step 1012 , eNB 1002 transmits a UE capability enquiry message to UE 1001 . The UE capability enquiry may be triggered by UE 1001 , or automatically initiated by eNB 1002 when CA is (re)configured. In response to the UE capability enquiry, UE 1001 reports UE capability information back to eNB 1002 in step 1013 . The UE capability information includes measurement parameters such as the need-for-gap parameters for each supported band and each CA band combination.

A second issue in measurement gap configuration is for an eNB to properly configure the UE measurement gap according its need. FIG. 11 illustrates several embodiments of measurement gap configuration and application in a mobile network comprising a UE 1101 and an eNB 1102 . As illustrated in FIG. 11 , in step 1111 , eNB 1102 transmits a measurement configuration message (e.g., an RRCConnectionReconfiguration message) to UE 1101 . The measurement configuration message includes measurement gap parameters (e.g., measGapConfig) for UE 1101 . In step 1112 , UE 1101 transmits a measurement gap application message (e.g., RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete message) to eNB 1102 after receiving and applying the measurement gap parameters. The measurement gap application message includes the MG application of each configured component carrier (CC). In step 1113 , eNB 1102 optionally transmits a confirmation message to UE 1101 such that UE 1101 applies MG parameters according to the confirmation message.

In a first embodiment, UE 1101 may report its MG application of each configured CC to eNB 1102 (e.g., in step 1112 ) after receiving the measurement configuration message from eNB 1102 (e.g., in step 1111 ). For example, UE 1101 may decide which CCs to apply the MG parameters according to its RF chain usage. The MG application may be reported via a bitmap associated with each configured CC (e.g., 1 for applying MG on the corresponding CC, and 0 for not applying MG on the corresponding CC). In one specific example, UE 1101 may report its MG application of each configured CC to eNB 1102 when the measurement configuration changes or when CC configuration changes (e.g., when CC is added, modified, or released).

In a second embodiment, eNB 1102 may confirm the MG usage by sending a confirmed message (e.g., step 1113 ). The confirmation message may be, for example, a binary bit (e.g., 1 for confirmation to UE's request of MG usage associated with each configured CC, and 0 for rejection and UE should apply the original MG configuration). The confirmation message may also be, for example, a MG bitmap associated with each configured CC (e.g., 1 for confirming MG on the corresponding configured CC, and 0 for rejecting). Based on the confirmation message, UE 1101 applies measurement gap accordingly.

In a third embodiment, eNB 1102 may configure measurement gap for UE 1101 with CC identities. Typically, MG is configured per-UE basis. However, to optimize system operation, MG may also be configured per-CC basis. The measurement configuration message (e.g., measGapConfig) may include a gap-offset parameter as well as corresponding CC identities. For example, the primary component carrier (PCC) which is responsible for control information transmission is not configured with MG. On the other hand, secondary component carriers (SCCs) may be configured with MG for measurements.

The data transmission scheduling of a UE depends on whether the UE is configured with MG and whether the UE applies the configured MG. In general, if a configured CC is configured and applied with MG, then the eNB does not schedule the CC any uplink/downlink data transmission during the gap period (e.g., MG=6 ms) in every measurement cycle (e.g., MGRP=40/80 ms). On the other hand, if a configured CC is not configured or applied with MG, then the eNB can continue to schedule normal data transmission without interruption on the CC.

FIG. 12 illustrates one example of UE scheduling after measurement gap configuration and application. In the example of FIG. 12 , the UE has two radio frequency modules RF# 1 and RF# 2 . RF# 1 operates over a primary component carrier PCC with center frequency fc 1 , while RF# 2 operates over a secondary component carrier SCC with center frequency fc 2 . In one embodiment, the UE sends measurement parameters (e.g., a need-for-gap bitmap) to eNB, and eNB responses with a configuration message to indicate which configured CCs are not configured with MG. These CCs can keep/resume normal operation (e.g., MG-less). For example, PCC is not configured with MG, so RF# 1 of the UE operates at frequency band fc 1 and keeps decoding PDCCH on PCC. On the other hand, SCC is configured with MG having MGRP=40 ms. As a result, RF# 2 of the UE operates at frequency band fc 2 from time t 1 , and switches to frequency band fc 3 of the target cell at time t 2 to perform measurements for 6 ms, and switches back to frequency band fc 2 at time t 3 to resume normal operation on SCC. If the UE receives a measurement configuration without additional information, for example, measurement gap without CC ID, then the UE should assume that MG is applied to all configured CCs. If the UE does not receive any confirmation from eNB, then the UE should apply the MG according to the original measurement configuration.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart of a method of measurement gap reporting, configuration, and application in accordance with one novel aspect. In step 1301 , a UE receives a capability enquiry message from a serving base station. The UE is equipped with multiple receivers supporting a list of frequency bands and a list of carrier aggregation (CA) band combinations. In step 1302 , the UE transmits UE capability information to the base station. The capability information contains measurement parameters, which comprise need-for-gap parameters for each supported frequency band and CA band combination associated with a list of to-be-measured frequency bands of target cells. The to-be-measured frequency bands include an inter-frequency band list and an inter-RAT band list. Each need-for-gap parameter is a Boolean variable, indicating whether measurement gap is needed for a specific frequency band or CA band combination associated with a specific to-be-measured frequency band. In step 1303 , the UE receives a measurement configuration message from the base station, which determines MG configuration for the UE based on the reported measurement parameters. In step 1304 , the UE transmits a measurement gap application message to the base station. The measurement gap application message indicates whether the UE applies MG for each configured component carrier. In step 1305 , the UE receives a confirmation message from the base station in response to the measurement gap application message. The confirmation message either confirms or rejects the MG application reported by the UE. Finally, in step 1306 , the UE applies MG based on the confirmation message.

Although the present invention is described above in connection with certain specific embodiments for instructional purposes, the present invention is not limited thereto. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and combinations of various features of the described embodiments can be practiced without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.