USPatent applicationPatented

Methods and systems for automated transportation of items between variable endpoints

Granted 29 Sep 2015 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20122014201620182020202220242026202820302032ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.

Description

6 parts
›BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to transportation of items and, more particularly, to automated methods and systems for transporting items between variable endpoints.

›BRIEF SUMMARY

An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source endpoint, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.

A method of transporting items between endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes the steps of: establishing a source endpoint and a destination endpoint; activating at least one autonomous mobile robot to automatically (a) travel to a source endpoint, (b) collect an item to be transported, (c) travel to the destination endpoint with the item, (d) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (e) repeat (a) through (d) for a given set of items; and changing the location of one or both of the source and destination endpoints, wherein the at least one robot dynamically adapts to changed endpoints to repeat steps (a)-(e).

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of a navigation system by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons or passive tags by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons and markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot in accordance with one or more embodiments.

Like or identical reference numbers are used to identify common or similar elements.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 3

Various embodiments disclosed herein are generally directed to material handling methods and systems. In particular, automated methods and systems are provided for transporting items between variable endpoints. An automated system in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and one or more autonomous mobile robots or platforms interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. Each robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints. The guidance system can mark a complete route or just the end points of a route for the robot.

Advantages of automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can include flexibility, minimal infrastructure, no programming needed, and adaptability to unstructured environments.

The automated system can be used across broad market segments. Automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can also be operated under a variety of conditions including the following. (1) The terrain is rough, e.g., outdoor environments where conventional material handling systems are difficult to use. (2) The surface over which material must travel cannot support heavy weight, e.g., the weight of trucks, forklifts or other mechanized solutions. (3) The workspace is unstructured and dynamic. In addition to most outdoor spaces, this description includes indoor spaces, where the workflow changes frequently or large objects (e.g., pallets) are often repositioned. (4) The pickup point or the drop off point or both, change during operations. (5) Obstruction of the workspace created by a fixed conveyor system is unacceptable. (6) Material must be moved long distances and system utilization is low to moderate. (7) The initial cost of the material-handling system is required to be low.

Platform

The form of an autonomous robot in a particular implementation can vary depending on payload and environmental factors. By way of example, if the robot operates on a flat surface inside a building, it can use a two-wheeled, differential drive mobility system. If it operates on a rough terrain, e.g., a construction site, it may use a tracked platform able to traverse inclines and loose soil.

Behaviors

The autonomous robots move items from a source or load point to a sink or unload point. The robot's basic behaviors depend on its relationship to the source and sink points and whether it is carrying a load. The following table describes some exemplary behaviors triggered by position and load status:

Beyond the basic behaviors outlined in the table, autonomous robots in accordance with various embodiments may have additional behaviors that are activated at intermediate positions along the route. These behaviors deal with obstacles (including other robots) discovered along the way.

Queuing

In accordance with one or more embodiments, each autonomous robot includes a sensor or other mechanism for detecting the presence of other nearby robots. If a robot encounters an obstacle along its route, it either stops or attempts to go around the obstacle. However, if the obstacle is another robot then the robot stops, thus forming a queue. Queues develop near endpoints of the route when robots wait to be loaded or unloaded.

Avoidance

If a robot encounters an obstacle along a route that is not another robot, the robot may attempt to continue toward its destination by skirting the object. The robot can include a wide-angle range sensor (see below) to provide it knowledge of obstructions on and near its route. This may make it possible for the robot to depart from a direct route and then return once the obstacle has been passed. However, whether the robot attempts to go around an obstacle or wait for the obstacle to move is a user choice. In generally uncluttered environments, it will be safe for a robot to search for an alternate route by itself. In more complex environments—especially those with non-geometric hazards—finding a safe alternative to the marked route may not be safe. Thus the user can instruct the robot whether to wait when the route is blocked.

Sensing

Route: In accordance with one or more embodiments, robots can navigate between source and sink using a guidance system such as a beacon marking the route's endpoints or a continuous route marker.

The beacon can be active (e.g., an IR emitter) or passive (e.g., a pattern recognized by an onboard camera). If a beacon is used, each robot should maintain a line of sight between the beacons, i.e., both beacons should be visible to the robot at nearly all times. The robot moves directly from one beacon toward the other unless an obstacle intervenes as described above.

The beacons can establish a coordinate system, where the beacon is the origin of the system. Angular encoding can be used to specify the axes of the coordinate system. The coordinate system enables robots to queue along a particular ray whose origin is the beacon. Angle encoding can also enable other useful properties.

A route marker indicating a robot's path may be used in situations where either a line of sight between beacons does not exist or traveling in a straight path between beacons is not desired. For example, a route marker might enable a robot to avoid a ditch at a construction site.

The route marker can be a worker-positioned tape or line, e.g., comprising a retro-reflective material that enables the robot to acquire it at a distance. The tape or line need not be permanently installed on the floor.

The robot can illuminate the tape or line using, e.g., conventional IR LEDs. In one or more embodiments, the robot detects the tape or line using a position-sensitive detector composed of discrete components (i.e., not a camera) to servo on the tape or line. The detector measures the degree of retro-reflectivity in view to eliminate false positives.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 3

In some embodiments, the robots servo on the line directly. In other embodiments, the robots can servo at any selected offset with respect to the line. Offset servoing enables two important properties. When placing the line to mark the robot's path, workers need not allow space between line and objects. Any time the robot finds its path partially blocked by an object, it will increase its offset from the line so that it can follow the line without colliding with the object. A second feature enabled by offset following allows two robots that meet while traveling along the line in opposite directions to avoid collision. When the robots determine that a collision is imminent, each can offset its position relative to the line. They can thus pass without obstructing each other.

Obstacles: In order to move safely along its route, each robot is equipped with a sensor such as a wide-angle range sensor.

Robot: Each robot can be equipped with a sensor able to distinguish between obstacles and other robots at relatively short range. By way of example, this sensor can be an active IR emitter on one robot that is detected by a receiver on the other robot. The components of this system on the two robots can be arranged such that the following robot detects the robot in front only when the two are physically close.

Load: To allow autonomous operation, each robot can further include a sensor capable of detecting when the robot carries a load. The robot uses the output from this sensor to decide whether to wait at an end point or traverse to the opposite endpoint (see table above).

Manipulation: Robots may optionally include a mechanism enabling a robot to load and unload itself.

User interface: The interface for each robot is preferably simple and intuitive such that the workers themselves are able to setup material handling system wherever necessary. In one or more embodiments, no programming is required.

Implementation Examples

Automated material handling systems can have a wide range of applications, including, by way of example, the following:

FIGS. 1-4 illustrate various possible guidance systems that can be used by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments. In FIG. 1 , the guidance system comprises a SLAM navigation system that gives robots 10 a global coordinate frame. In this formulation destinations are coordinates, thus no physical markers are necessary.

As shown in FIG. 2 , beacons or passive tags 12 visible from a large distance mark each possible destination. This method allows the robot to reach any inbox or outbox without the need of a global frame.

FIG. 3 shows a guidance system combining shorter-range beacons 12 with “highways” established by markers 14 attached to the floor to give the robots a rough global frame. This arrangement simplifies range sensor requirements compared to SLAM.

In FIG. 4 , robots are guided by marker 16 laid on the ground, in some cases temporarily.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot 10 . The robot 10 includes a chassis and a drive subsystem 52 for maneuvering the chassis. It further includes a guidance subsystem 54 on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system. In some embodiments, the subsystem 54 includes one or more marker detecting sensors able to detect the position of a marker such as a retro-reflective tape laid on the ground. By way of example, the marker detecting sensors can each comprise a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources (e.g., LEDs) to servo on the marker.

In some embodiments, the guidance subsystem 54 comprises a plurality of beacons, each having a radio frequency or other (e.g., infrared) beacon transmitter. In this case, the guidance subsystem 54 includes one or more sensors for detecting signals from beacons.

The robot includes an obstacle detection subsystem 56 for detecting other robots and obstacles.

The robot includes a microprocessor-based controller subsystem 58 for controlling operation of the robot in performing programmed behaviors. A power supply 50 for all the subsystems can include one or more rechargeable batteries.

In some embodiments, the drive subsystem 52 takes the form of a differential drive comprising two coaxial wheels and a roller for balance. The wheels are driven together or independently by one or more motors and a drive train controlled by the controller subsystem 58 .

The obstacle detection subsystem 56 can include one or more range sensors to detect other robots and obstacles. In some embodiments, the range sensor is a wide-angle (120 degree) range sensor. Raw range sensor data (in the form of a list of angle and range readings) supplied by the sensor is processed by a computer processor (e.g., a processor in the controller subsystem 58 ) to return the position of other robots and obstacles.

The controller subsystem 58 is configured (e.g., programmed) to perform various functions, including transporting items between endpoints. The controller subsystem 58 is responsive to the output of guidance subsystem 54 and the output of obstacle detection subsystem 56 . The controller subsystem 58 controls the drive subsystem 52 to maneuver the robot to prescribed endpoint locations.

Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present disclosure to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Additionally, elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 3 of 3

The processes the robots are programmed to perform as described above may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. The processes are preferably implemented in one or more computer programs executing on the programmable controller subsystem, which includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including, e.g., volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), and input and output devices. Each computer program can be a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in a random access memory. Until required, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory (e.g., in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk, external hard drive, memory card, or flash drive) or stored on another computer system and downloaded via the Internet or other network.

Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and are not intended to be limiting.

›Tables in the description — 2
PositionLoad statusBehavior
SourceLoadedMove toward sink
EmptyStop, wait to be loaded
Intermediate[Don'tProceed along the route until an
care]endpoint is reached
SinkLoadedStop, wait to be unloaded
EmptyMove toward source
CurrentAutomatedSystem
ApplicationPracticeSolutionAdvantages
Produce pickerLaborers inWorkersThe automated
conveyorthe field pickestablishsystem
produce androutes foreliminates the
place it in aone or moretime workers
basket orautonomousspend in transit
sling.robots. Theand eliminates
Periodically,robots travelthe need to carry
they carryalong cropheavy loads.
therows and stop
produceat the
from thecollection
field to apoint.
truck orPeriodically a
otherrobot arrives
collectionat the place
point.where a
worker is
picking. The
worker places
just-picked
produce on
the robot then
continues
picking.
Truck LoadingTrucks backRobots moveThe automated
up to theproducts intosystem reduces
loading dock.the trucks. Athe time and
Workers moveworker in thenumber of
items from aloading areaworkers needed
warehouse orplaces itemsto load a truck.
other facilityonto a robotReduced loading
into theand dispatchestime translates
loading area.it to thedirectly into cost
There thecorrect truck.savings
items may beA worker inespecially in
staged intothe trucksituations where
orders orpacks thecustomers must
loadedtruck.pay the trucking
directly ontocompany for idle
the trucks.time while trucks
In either case,are loaded.
workers make
a large
number of
back and
forth trips
to move
items into
trucks.
BaggageAt smallTicket agentsThe automated
Handlingairports ticketplace luggagesystem enables
agents collecton robotsmore timely
luggage ontoqueued in thedepartures by
a tray or pullticket area.reducing the
cart asBags thenloading
passengersmovebottleneck. It also
check in.immediatelymakes more
Eventually,to theefficient use of
a batch ofaircraftairline personnel.
bags isloading area.Bags can be
hauled outloaded onto the
to theairplane as
airplane.passengers
Loadingarrive and need
cannot beginnot be loaded en
until themass just before
batch arrives.takeoff.
ContractWork isWhen a newThe automated
Manufacturingtypicallycontract jobsystem improves
performed onbegins routesthe efficiency of
theare establishedlow-volume
subassembliesbetween themanufacturing by
of a product atvarious stationsproviding the
severalwhere the workbenefits of
differentwill be done.automatic
assemblyThe robotsconveyor
stations. Theautomaticallysystems where
particularcarrythey cannot
stationssubassembliesnow be used.
involved andfrom each
the flow ofstation to the
work piecesnext.
among them
may change
with each
contract job.
Because
workflow is
frequently
scrambled,
fixed
conveyor
systems
cannot be
used.
StockingWorkersWorkers markThe automated
shelves inplacethe start andsystem eliminates
storesmerchandiseend points ofmultiple round
on stockinga route. Atrips. Workers
carts thenworker in theneed set up a
push thestore's storageroute only once,
carts to thearea loadsthen the robot
correct arearobots withwill follow it
of the store.the properhowever many
Popular itemsitems. Aftertimes necessary.
or items thatthe robots
do not stackhave
well maydelivered
requiretheir cargo
many trips.to the proper
areas (using
an optional
AutoOffLoad
feature)
workers can
stock the
shelves.
ConstructionObstructionsWorkers setThe automated
site materialor softup a route forsystem saves
deliverysurfaces atrobots totime by relieving
constructionfollow. Aworkers of the
sites oftenworker at oneneed to manually
prevent trucksend of the routecart material from
from deliveringloads robotsthe delivery truck
material to thewith material,to the work point.
place where itand a worker at
will be used.the work point
In these casesunloads them.
workers may
need to make
repeated trips
to carry or
cart item from
the delivery
point to the
work area.
LandscapingTrucks filledA route isThe automated
site materialwith plantsestablishedsystem reduces
deliveryand otherwith drop offthe time needed
items arrivepoints indicated.to distribute
at aThe robots areplants at
landscapingloaded at thelandscaping
site. Becausetruck thensites.
trucks cannotautomatically
drive on thecarry plants to
lawn allthe proper point
materialsand drop them
must beoff.
carried or
handcarted
to the places
where they
will be
installed.
Debris removalWorkersRobotsThe automated
tear outcontinuouslysystem
walls,carry debriseliminates the
fixtures,away from thetime workers
and otherwork area asspend in transit
items init is generated.hauling debris.
preparationBecause the
for newwork area never
construction.becomes
The workcluttered with
area becomesdebris
filled withdemolition
debris. Cartsproceeds
are brought in,more
loaded withefficiently.
debris, and it
is moved to a
dumpster,
usually
located
outdoors.
Consumer leafRemovingTheThe automated
collectionfallen leaveshomeownersystem makes
typicallyplaces araking faster
involvesbeacon at theand easier.
raking thepoint where
leaves into athe leaves are
pile, placingto be deposited.
the pile on aAn automated
wheelbarrowrobot repeatedly
or tarp, thentravels between
moving thethe leaf deposit
wheelbarrowpoint and the
or tarp to aplace where the
collectionowner is raking.
point.The robot
dumps the
leaves using
an optional
dumping
mechanism.

Claims as granted

32 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

2 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06F7/70
  • G06Q10/08

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.9 y
1,429 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Interviews
3
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Kim T Nguyen
art unit 2454 · TC 2400
Citations: 146 back · 39 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20122014201620182020202220242026202820302032Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock