USPatent applicationPatented

Galvanic cell having a lithium metal or an alloy comprising a lithium metal as anode material and an electrolyte having lithium . . . complex salt

Granted 29 Nov 2016 · 6 office actions

Current assignee: Chemetall GmbH · originally BASF SE

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Ute Emmel, Rebecca Metzger, Ulrich Wietelmann, Thorsten Buhrmester · Examiner: Daniel Gatewood · AU 1729 · TC 1700

Life of the application

22 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A galvanic cell having a lithium metal or an alloy comprising a lithium metal as anode material, having an electrolyte comprising lithium bis(oxalate)borate and at least one other lithium complex salt in an aprotic solvent or solvent mixture, in the ratio of lithium complex salt in the conducting salt equals 0.01 to 20 mol %.

Description

2 parts
›RELATED APPLICATIONS · 1 of 2

This application is a §371 application of PCT/EP2010/000992 filed Feb. 17, 2010, and claims priority from German Patent Application No. 10 2009 000 977.9 filed Feb. 18, 2009.

The invention relates to a galvanic cell having a lithium metal or an alloy containing a lithium metal as anode material.

Mobile electronic devices require ever more powerful rechargeable batteries for an independent power supply. In addition to nickel/cadmium and nickel/metal hydride rechargeable batteries, lithium batteries in particular, which in comparison to the first-named systems have a markedly higher energy density, are suitable for these purposes. Large-format lithium rechargeable batteries are also to be used in future for e.g., static applications (power back-up) and in the automotive sector for traction purposes (hybrid drives or electric-only drives). Lithium-ion batteries, in which a graphite-containing substance is used as the anode, are currently being developed and used for this purpose. In the charged state graphite anodes can generally store (intercalate) no more than 1 lithium per 6 carbon atoms, corresponding to a limiting stoichiometry LiC 6 . This results in a lithium density of max. 8.8 wt. %. The anode material thus brings about an undesired restriction of the energy density of such battery systems.

Instead of lithium intercalation anodes such as graphite, lithium metal or an alloy containing a lithium metal (e.g. alloys of lithium with aluminium, silicon, tin, titanium or antimony) can in principle also be used as the anode material. In comparison to the commonly used graphite intercalation cathode, this principle would allow a markedly higher specific lithium charge and hence energy density. Unfortunately such lithium-metal-containing systems exhibit unfavourable safety characteristics. In unfavourable operating conditions (e.g. elevated temperatures), decomposition reactions can occur which lead to a dangerous run-away situation. The battery then begins a spontaneous heating process, which can result in an explosive formation of gas and destruction of the battery casing. Owing to the combustibility of common electrolyte solutions consisting of organic solvents or mixtures thereof such as carbonic acid esters, for example ethylene carbonate (EC), propylene carbonate (PC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), lactones, for example γ-butyrolactone (γ-BL), or ethers, for example dimethoxyethane (DME), fires can occur. As current lithium batteries contain an unstable, fluorine-containing supporting electrolyte (LiPF 6 or LiBF 4 ), dangerous, caustic and toxic decomposition products (hydrogen fluoride and volatile fluorine-containing organic products) also form during such events. For these reasons, rechargeable batteries containing lithium metal have hitherto been produced only at a micro-design scale, for example button cells.

The object of the invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art as described above and to propose a safe, rechargeable battery system with an energy density exceeding that of lithium-ion technology.

According to the invention the object is achieved by means of a galvanic cell having a lithium metal or an alloy containing a lithium metal as anode material, said galvanic cell having an electrolyte containing lithium bis(oxalato)borate and at least one further lithium complex salt of formulae I and/or II in an aprotic solvent or solvent blend, wherein

wherein the proportion of compound (I) and/or (II) in the supporting electrolyte is 0.01 to 20 mol % and X, Y and Z in the formulae (I, II) is a bridge which is connected to the boron or phosphorus atom by two oxygen atoms and is selected from

where

Z=N, N═C;

Surprisingly it has been found that when mixed with one of the cited complex additives, LiBOB appears to form a thin, extremely thermally stable layer on the lithium metal or lithium metal alloy surface, which effectively prevents a decomposition reaction between the lithium-metal-containing anode material and the electrolyte component. Furthermore, the undesired gas formation at elevated temperatures, which can cause a battery cell to explode, is substantially reduced. This effect is not observed if an electrolyte containing exclusively LiBOB as supporting electrolyte or containing a fluorine-containing supporting electrolyte is used.

The galvanic cell advantageously contains only one of the compounds according to formula I and/or II in an amount from 0.1 to 10 wt. %.

Alternatively the galvanic cell contains only one of the compounds according to formula I and/or II in an amount from 0.2 to 5 wt. %.

A galvanic cell in which only fluorine-free materials are contained in the electrolyte is particularly preferred.

A galvanic cell containing lithium tris(oxalato)phosphate or lithium maionato-oxalatoborate as lithium complex salts is most particularly preferred.

A galvanic cell in which the electrolyte is present as a liquid or gel electrolyte is also preferred.

The solvent in the electrolyte of the galvanic cell is preferably propylene carbonate or a mixture of ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate.

According to the invention the galvanic cell is used to produce large-format batteries for electric drives or for static applications.

The invention is illustrated in more detail below by reference to five examples, three comparative examples and five figures.

To demonstrate the surprising observations mentioned above, experiments with lithium metal/electrolyte mixtures are described in the following section. Anhydrous mixtures of lithium metal (battery grade, i.e. with a sodium content below 200 ppm), lithium supporting electrolytes (LiPF 6 or LiBOB) and optionally a further lithium complex salt, e.g. lithium tris(oxalato)phosphate (LiTOP) or lithium malonato-oxalatoborate (LiMOB), were produced in conventionally used solvents (PC or EC-EMC) and approximately 2.5 g of such mixtures were introduced into steel autoclaves with an approximate capacity of 3 ml in an argon-filled glove box. These vessels were heated in a RADEX apparatus and the thermal effects that occurred were measured (DSC). In further tests the steel autoclaves were connected to pressure sensors to allow gas formation to be observed as well.

›RELATED APPLICATIONS · 2 of 2

FIG. 1 shows the behaviour of fluorine-free, LiBOB-based electrolyte solutions in the presence of Li metal;

FIG. 2 shows the DSC test and simultaneous pressure monitoring of a PC solution containing 14% LiBOB and 1% LiTOP in the presence of lithium metal granules;

FIG. 3 shows the DSC test and simultaneous pressure monitoring of a solution of 15% LiPF 6 in PC in the presence of lithium metal granules;

FIG. 4 shows the DSC test and simultaneous pressure monitoring of a PC solution containing 14% LiPF 6 and 1% LiTOP in the presence of lithium metal granules;

FIG. 5 shows DSC tests of LiBOB-containing, fluorine-free solutions in EC-EMC (50:50) in the presence of lithium metal granules.

FIG. 1 shows the behaviour of fluorine-free, LiBOB-based electrolyte solutions in the presence of Li metal (Examples 1 to 3 and comparative example 1.)

In all experiments a weak endotherm is detected at an oven temperature of approx. 190-200° C., which can be attributed to the melting of the lithium metal content.

In comparative example 1 (not according to the invention) exclusively 15 wt. % of LiBOB-containing electrolyte is used as the supporting electrolyte. A strongly exothermic event can be seen (red curve) with a peak temperature of approx. 205° C. If by contrast a PC solution containing 14 wt. % LiBOB and 1 wt. % LiMOB is used as described in Example 1 (light blue curve), a markedly reduced evolution of heat is observed. This effect is even more evident with the partial substitution for LiBOB of 0.3% (Example 2—green curve) or 1% (Example 3—dark blue curve) LiTOP.

In Example 3 according to the invention, simultaneous pressure measurement shows that the scarcely exothermic decomposition reaction (peak oven temperature approx. 250° C.) of a LiBOB-LiTOP electrolyte is accompanied by only a very slight evolution of gas.

Comparative example 2 below shows the pressure-temperature behaviour of an electrolyte solution based purely on LiPF 6 . If an oven temperature of approx. 210° C. is exceeded, a highly exothermic decomposition event begins, accompanied by an explosive formation of gas. The pressure (blue curve) rises in a matter of seconds from <10 bar to >250 bar.

Examples 4 and 5 below (electrolyte solutions of LiBOB/LiTOP) show in comparison to the example not according to the invention (electrolyte solution containing only LiBOB) that the desired lithium metal stabilisation also takes place in the EC-EMC solvent blend. The addition of LiTOP shifts the peak temperature of the decomposition upwards by approximately 30° C., and the release of heat is very markedly reduced, in other words the undesired decomposition reaction between the components lithium metal and organic electrolyte solution takes place to a lesser extent in the examples according to the invention.

›Tables in the description — 1
S, S═C; O, O═C;C═C
Y 1 and Y 2 together denote O, m=1, n=0 and Y 3 and Y 4 are independently of each other H or an alkyl radical having 1 to 5 C atoms, orY 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 are each independently of one another OR (where R=alkyl radical having 1 to 5 C atoms), H or an alkyl radical R 1 , R 2 having 1 to 5 C atoms, and where m, n=0 or 1.

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

11 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07F5/02
  • C07F5/04
  • C07F9/6574
Section H — Electricity
  • H01M10/056
  • H01M4/38
  • H01M10/0569
  • H01M10/052
  • H01M10/42
  • H01M4/134
  • H01M10/0567
  • H01M10/0568

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom20102011201220132014201520162017USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalAdvisory actionResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
6.8 y
2,477 days filing → grant
Office actions
6
non-final + final
Responses
7
3 RCE
Examiner
Daniel Gatewood
art unit 1729 · TC 1700
Citations: 11 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock