USPatent applicationPatented

Boundary resolution improvement for a capacitive touch panel

Granted 20 Aug 2013 · 1 office action

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A capacitive touch panel has a plurality of traces including a boundary trace, and a virtual trace is defined outward of the boundary trace and assigned with a virtual coordinate and a virtual capacitance for interpolation to position a touch point around the boundary of the capacitive touch panel, thereby eliminating the non-addressable region of the capacitive touch panel.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related generally to a capacitive touch panel and, more particularly, to a positioning method for a capacitive touch panel.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

As shown in FIG. 1 , a capacitive touch panel 10 has a plurality of traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 in X-direction, which are assigned with the coordinates X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 and X 5 respectively, from the boundary 12 to the right. Each coordinate X m represents where the center of the corresponding trace is in the X-direction, and the coordinate X m may be a relative coordinate or an absolute coordinate in the X-direction. When the capacitive touch panel 10 is touched, the capacitances of the touched traces are changed. By sensing the traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 for the capacitances thereon, the measured capacitances C m , typically converted by an analog-to-digital converter (not shown in FIG. 1 ) into digital values, are used together with the coordinate X m for interpolation to position the touch point at the coordinate

X = ∑ m = 1 n ⁢ ( X m × C m ) / ∑ m = 1 n ⁢ C m , [ Eq ⁢ - ⁢ 1 ]

where n is the number of the traces. However, this method is good only for positioning the touch points within the range 24 . If the usable area of the capacitive touch panel 10 is extended to the boundary 12 for hardware-related reasons, due to the coordinates X m of the traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 all defined in correspondence to their respective centers, any touch points around the boundary 12 and beyond (i.e., to the left of) the center X 1 of the boundary trace 14 cannot be positioned precisely by the above interpolation algorithm and thus a non-addressable region 26 is present. All capacitive touch panels have such non-addressable regions at their boundaries that are useless for user's touch operation.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for boundary resolution improvement of a capacitive touch panel.

According to the present invention, a virtual trace outward of the boundary trace of a capacitive touch panel is defined and assigned with a virtual coordinate and a virtual capacitance for interpolation to position a touch point around the boundary, thereby eliminating the non-addressable region of the capacitive touch panel.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing conventional positioning methods for a capacitive touch panel using interpolation algorithm;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a positioning method for a capacitive touch panel according to the present invention; and

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a positioning method for a capacitive touch panel.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, as shown in FIG. 2 , for a capacitive touch panel 10 having a plurality of traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 in X-direction, a virtual trace 28 is defined outward of the boundary trace 14 and assigned with a virtual coordinate X 0 in the X-direction. The term “virtual” indicates the trace 28 not physical or hardware as are the traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 . When the capacitive touch panel 10 is touched, the capacitances of the touched physical traces are changed, and the measured capacitances C m from the physical traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 are converted by an analog-to-digital converter (not shown in FIG. 2 ) into digital values. For interpolation to calculate the coordinate X of the touch point, a virtual measured capacitance C 0 is assigned to the virtual trace 28 . For example, in this embodiment, the virtual measured capacitance C 0 is preset at zero. In order to determine the coordinate X of the touch point, the mean coordinates of each two adjacent ones of the physical and virtual traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 22 and 28 are calculated by the equation X′ m =(X m −X m+1 )/2, as indicated by the coordinates X 0 ′, X 1 ′, X 2 ′, X 3 ′ and X 4 ′ shown in FIG. 2 , the averages of the measured capacitances of each two adjacent ones of the physical and virtual traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 22 and 28 are calculated by the equation C′ m =(C m +C m+1 )/2, as indicated by the measured capacitances C 0 ′, C 1 ′, C 2 ′, C 3 ′ and C 4 ′ shown in FIG. 2 , and then the mean coordinates and the averages measured capacitances are used for interpolation to calculate the coordinate

X = ∑ m = 0 n - 1 ⁢ ( X m ′ × C m ′ ) / ∑ m = 0 n - 1 ⁢ C m ′ , [ Eq ⁢ - ⁢ 2 ]

where n is the number of the physical traces. With this method, any touch points within the region 30 can be positioned, thereby eliminating the addressable region 26 shown in FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the above positioning method, in which step S 1 senses the physical traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 for the capacitances C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , C 4 and C 5 thereon, step S 2 defines the virtual trace 28 outward of the boundary trace 14 and assigns the virtual coordinate X 0 and the virtual measured capacitance C 0 ′ thereto, where the virtual measured capacitance can be set zero, non-zero constant, or variable with the measured capacitances C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , C 4 and C 5 , step S 3 calculates the average measured capacitances C 0 ′, C 1 ′, C 2 ′, C 3 ′ and C 4 ′ and the mean coordinates X 0 ′, X 1 ′, X 2 ′, X 3 ′ and X 4 ′ from each two adjacent ones of the physical and virtual traces 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 22 and 28 , and step S 4 interpolates with the average measured capacitances C 0 ′, C 1 ′, C 2 ′, C 3 ′ and C 4 ′ and the mean coordinates X 0 ′, X 1 ′, X 2 ′, X 3 ′ and X 4 ′ to calculate the X-coordinate of the touch point.

The method according to the present invention can be used in conjunction with any conventional positioning methods in the way that when the measured capacitance of the boundary trace 14 is non zero or is the maximum of the measured capacitances of all the physical traces, the above interpolation algorithm of the present invention is executed to calculate the coordinate of the touch point.

While the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope thereof as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims as granted

4 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

16 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06F3/041
  • G06F3/043
  • G06F3/042
  • G06F3/045
USPC · US Patent Classification
345/178178/18.1345/175178/18.3345/173178/18.4178/18.2178/18.5345/176178/18.6345/174345/177

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionApplicant-initiated interviewExaminer-initiated interview
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.0 y
1,091 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Interviews
2
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Sumati Lefkowitz
art unit 2694 · TC 2600
Citations: 1 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock