USPatent applicationPatented

Method for diesel particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle equipped with a hybrid engine background of the invention

Granted 6 Nov 2012 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

16 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The method for regeneration of a diesel particulate filter of a vehicle equipped with a hybrid engine, wherein the temperature of the exhaust exiting the diesel engine is increased above a predetermined level by increasing load thereon, through optimization of interaction between the diesel particulate filter aftertreatment system and the hybrid engine control through messaging via a communication bus is disclosed. The load on the engine may be increased with or without the assistance of the electric motor/generator of the hybrid engine, and will not affect required acceleration/deceleration of the vehicle.

Description

8 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present disclosure relates to a method for diesel particulate filter regeneration. More specifically, the method relates to diesel particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train.

2. Prior Art

There is no known prior art related to this method for diesel particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided is a method for regeneration of a diesel particulate filter of a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train, wherein the temperature of the exhaust exiting a diesel engine is increased above a predetermined level by increasing load on the diesel engine when regeneration occurs. Interaction between the diesel particulate filter aftertreatment system and the hybrid power train is controlled through messaging via a communication bus. The load on the diesel engine may be increased with or without the assistance of the electric motor of the hybrid power train and will not affect accelerator/deceleration of the vehicle.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 presents a logic flow diagram of the steps of the method of the present invention.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to FIG. 1 in greater detail, a representative embodiment of the present method provides a solution for particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle provided with a hybrid power train and involves messaging over a communication bus to indicate that regeneration is required. Such messaging will ultimately increase or maintain the load on a diesel engine allowing for increase or maintenance of exhaust temperature as required for regeneration.

The diesel particulate filter (DPF) undergoes regeneration in response to filter flow being reduced due to soot build up within the DPF. During normal operating conditions, a hybrid power train, in which load is allocated between a diesel engine and an electric motor/generator, may not always produce exhaust temperatures hot enough to accomplish regeneration of the DPF. The present method will request that the electric motor/generator act as a generator to increase load to the diesel engine during regeneration in order to rapidly increase exhaust temperatures required for regeneration, if the battery pack of the vehicle is below maximum charge, which will result in a decrease in time required to regenerate the diesel particulate filter. If, on the other hand, the charge on the battery pack is at maximum, the logic will shut down the electric motor/generator until regeneration is no longer necessary, and the load will be completely transferred to the diesel engine, again decreasing the time taken to regenerate the DPF. The method optimizes interactions between the DPF aftertreatment system and the hybrid power train control (ECM). If the battery pack is at a maximum and the after treatment system is equipped with a resistive element the heating element can be activated thereby heating the feedstream gas to the after treatment inlet and providing a uniform load on the engine. The affect will be to maintain maximum battery charge and reduce the duration of the regeneration event and associated emissions.

It will be understood that the regeneration is accomplished by getting the exhaust temperature hot enough, long enough to burn off the soot that has accumulated in the filter. The higher the load on the diesel engine, the hotter the exhaust and the faster the filter is cleared. The addition of an optional heating element can promote this action during initial heating phase.

It will further be understood that when the vehicle is equipped with such hybrid power train, and the electric motor/generator is assisting the diesel engine in motor mode, load is taken away from the diesel engine because the electric motor/generator thereof is “sharing” the load with the diesel engine.

It will be further understood that the method sends and receives information or data via a communication bus.

An overview and explanation of what occurs are found in the flowchart of FIG. 1 and as set forth below.

›Step 1 . The logic of the method starts

Step 2 . The logic first determines if the vehicle is equipped with a hybrid power train. If not, the logic moves on to Step 3 . If so, the logic moves on to Step 4 A.

Step 3 . The logic ends. It will be understood that each time the logic ends within this scheme, the hybrid power train reverts to its hybrid operation, with the electric motor sharing the load with the diesel engine, as necessary.

Step 4 A. The logic next checks to see if a regeneration of the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is needed. The determination is based on sensing for a pressure drop across the DPF continually at Step 4 B. It will be understood that, as the filter accumulates soot, the passages there through become plugged, producing a pressure drop, due to a restriction in through flow. When the sensed pressure drop becomes greater than a threshold, a flag is set at Step 4 B indicating that regeneration of the DPF is required. If no flag is set, the logic moves on to Step 5 . If the flag is set, the logic moves on to Step 6 A.

›Step 5 . The logic ends

Step 6 A. Here the logic determines if the load factor on the diesel engine is below a critical threshold for DPF regeneration from a sensing of the instantaneous load factor at Step 6 B. If not, the logic proceeds to Step 7 . If so, it will be understood that the exhaust will not get hot enough to clean the DPF and the logic proceeds to Step 8 A.

›Step 7 . The logic ends

Step 8 A. Once it is determined that the load factor on the diesel engine is below the critical level, the logic determines the state of charge on the battery pack that is connected to the electric motor/generator of the hybrid power train from sensing the state of battery charge at Step 8 B. If the battery pack is at full charge, the electric motor/generator cannot be used as a generator because the battery pack will be damaged by overcharging thereof and the logic proceeds to Step 9 . If the charge on the battery pack is below full charge, the logic proceeds to Step 10 A.

Step 9 . The logic causes the electric motor/generator to be disabled and the additional load previously shared by the electric motor is returned to the diesel engine to produce a load factor over the critical threshold, the vehicle reverting to a “non-hybrid”, diesel engine configuration while the regeneration of the DPF is occurring to ensure the load factor stays above the critical threshold for such regeneration. If the electric motor/generator is disabled, the logic intermittently moves on to Step 14 .

Step 10 A. If the battery pack is not at maximum charge, the electric motor/generator is utilized as a generator to charge the battery pack at Step 10 C and to apply an additional load to the diesel engine by commanding the electric motor/generator on, which causes the electric motor/generator to absorb torque from the diesel engine, creating a “torque error” as sensed at Step 10 B, and the logic moves on to Step 11 A.

Step 11 A. At this step, the logic computes the torque output of the diesel engine from an input of the DDT at Step 11 B and an input of the torque absorbed by the electric motor/generator, acting as a generator, at Step 11 C, by subtracting the absorbed torque input (negative torque) from the DDT input, to obtain a higher value, which higher value of diesel engine torque must be decreased to maintain the DDT at the required level. The logic then moves on to Step 11 D.

Step 11 D. Here the “extra” torque required as calculated at Step 11 A, to maintain the Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) constant is output to the engine control module (ECM) The logic moves on to Step 12 .

Step 12 . The load on the diesel engine is increased by the amount the electric motor/generator is absorbing there from, as determined at Step 11 D, to maintain the Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) constant and the logic moves on to Step 13 .

Step 13 A. If Drive/Power Train Torque (DTT) equals Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) (DTT=DDT) as determined from a sensing of DDT at Step 13 B and DTT at Step 13 C, then nothing need change and the logic circles back to Point 2 . Alternatively, if DTT does not equal DDT, the logic circles back to Point 1 , as the method needs to be stepped through again to determine what has changed.

Step 14 . Here, as follows Step 9 described above, when the electric motor/generator has been disabled, the logic polls the PDF regeneration required input intermittently to see if regeneration is still required. If so, the logic returns to Point 1 . If not, the logic moves on to Step 15 . Step 15 . The logic commands the electric motor/generator to turn back on and the logic moves on to Step 16 .

›Step 16 . The logic ends

As described above, the method of the present invention provides a number of advantages, some of which have been described above and others of which are inherent in the invention. Also, modifications may be proposed to the method without departing from the teachings herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is only to be limited as necessitated by the accompanying claims.

Claims as granted

6 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F01N11/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
701/54701/2260/295

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2010Jul 2010Oct 2010Jan 2011Apr 2011Jul 2011Oct 2011Jan 2012Apr 2012Jul 2012Oct 2012Jan 2013USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionAdvisory action
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.6 y
937 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Joseph C Rodriguez
art unit 3653 · TC 3600
Citations: 80 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock