USPatent applicationPatented

System and method for testing image capturing function of an electronic device

Granted 1 Jan 2013 · 1 office action

Assignee: Foxconn Technology Group

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Qing-Hua Liu, De-Gang Liu · Examiner: Behrooz Senfi · AU 2482 · TC 2400

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method for testing an image capturing function of an electronic device includes following blocks. A test program package with an exemplar image is installed in the electronic device. The electronic device is placed on a test fixture used for limiting an image capturing position and an image capturing angle of the electronic device. The electronic device captures an image to be tested by the electronic device. The image to be tested is compared with the exemplar image to determine whether the image capturing function of the electronic device is satisfactory.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to a system and method for testing an image capturing function of a portable electronic device.

2. Description of Related Art

Today, more electronic devices, (e.g., cell phones, PDAs, notebook computers) have cameras to capture images. In order to provide qualified electronic devices to consumers, it is necessary to examine the images captured by the electronic devices.

One typical method to test the image capturing function of the electronic device includes following steps: taking a photo of an object; and inspecting whether the image has any visible defect to determine whether the image capturing function of the electronic device is satisfactory. However, the typical test method needs operators to manually inspect the photo captured by the electronic device, which is inefficient, and the test result may be not accurate.

In order to test the image capturing function of the electronic device more efficiently, an automatic test software has been designed. The electronic device takes a photo of a standard picture card, and the test software is used to automatically compare the picture card and the photo captured by the electronic device to determine whether the image capturing function of the electronic device is satisfactory. However, the distance and angle at which the electronic device captures the photo is variable, and the test result may be not accurate.

A test system and method for testing an image capturing function of an electronic device efficiently and accurately is desired.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view of a test fixture with a notebook computer placed thereon according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is another view of the test fixture in FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is similar to the FIG. 1 , but showing a pivotable panel of the test fixture rotated upwardly to a different angle.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system for testing an image capturing function of an electronic device according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method for testing an image capturing function of an electronic device according to the present disclosure.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation. In the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an” or “one” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references mean at least one.

In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic imbedded in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, written in a programming language, such as, Java, C, or assembly. One or more software instructions in the modules may be imbedded in firmware, such as an EPROM. It will be understood that modules may comprise of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and may also be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules described herein may be implemented as either software and/or hardware modules and may be stored in any type of computer-readable medium or other computer storage device.

Referring to FIGS. 1 to 4 , an embodiment of a test system in accordance with the present disclosure includes a test fixture 10 and a notebook computer 20 with an image capturing function to be tested. In the embodiment, the notebook computer 20 is to be tested in a product line. The notebook computer 20 includes a display panel 22 and a camera lens 24 mounted above the display panel 22 . The test fixture 10 includes a seat 12 and a pivotable panel 14 pivotally attached to the seat 12 . The seat 12 includes a base panel 121 for supporting the notebook computer 20 , a rear flange panel 123 extending from a rear edge of the base panel 121 , and a side flange panel 125 extending from a side edge of the base panel 121 . A height of the side flange panel 125 is less than that of the rear flange panel 123 . The pivotable panel 14 is pivotally attached to a front side of the base panel 121 via a pivot 16 and is capable of being fixed at a desired angle by static friction. An object 18 to be captured by the notebook computer 20 is attached on an inner side of the pivotable panel 14 . In the embodiment, the objected 18 to be tested is a picture card.

During the testing of the image capturing function of the notebook computer 20 , the notebook computer 20 is placed on the base panel 121 and secured by the rear flange panel 123 and the side flange panel 125 . The opening angle of the monitor 22 relative to a main body of the notebook computer 20 is substantially equal to an angle between the base panel 121 and the rear flange panel 123 . The pivotable panel 14 is rotated to an appropriate angle and fixed there by the static friction. Then the notebook computer 20 can then capture an image of the picture card 18 at a desired position and angle. An automatic test module 30 is capable of comparing the image with an exemplar image to determine whether the image captured by the notebook computer 20 is qualified. In the embodiment, the automatic test module 30 is installed in the notebook computer 20 and contains the exemplar image.

In the embodiment, each notebook computer in the product line is capable of being placed on the seat 12 of the test fixture 10 in a same position, thereby keeping the photo capturing distance and angle constant. Thus, it will improve the efficiency and accuracy of the test.

Referring to FIG. 5 , an operational sequence, according to one embodiment of above described test system, includes following blocks.

In block S 01 , a sample notebook computer is placed on the base panel 121 of the test fixture 10 and secured by the rear flange panel 123 and the side flange panel 125 . An opening angle of the monitor of the sample notebook computer is substantially equal to the angle between the base panel 121 and the rear flange panel 123 . The sample notebook computer has passed a previous image capturing test and has a satisfactory image capturing function.

In block S 02 , the picture card 18 is attached on the pivotable panel 14 of the test fixture 10 and rotating together with the pivotable panel 14 to reach an appropriate angle.

In block S 03 , the sample notebook computer utilizes it's camera to capture a image of the picture card 18 .

In block S 04 , the image captured by the sample notebook computer is checked for suitability as an exemplar image. If the image is suitable to be an exemplar image, go to block S 05 . If the image is not suitable to be an exemplar image, go back to block S 02 to continue rotating the pivotable panel 14 until reaching the appropriate angle where a suitable exemplar image can be captured.

In block S 05 , the exemplar image is utilized as a test image file and copied to a test program package.

In block S 06 , the test program package is installed in all notebook computers to be tested in the product line.

In block S 07 , the notebook computer 20 is placed on the seat 12 of the test fixture 10 in the same position and opening angle as the sample notebook computer.

In block S 08 , the notebook computer 20 utilizes its camera lens 24 to capture an image of the picture card 18 .

In block S 09 , the image captured by the notebook computer 20 is compared with the exemplar image.

In block S 10 , it is determined whether the parameters (intensity, RGB values, etc.) of the image captured by the notebook computer 20 are close enough to that of the exemplar image. If the parameters of the image captured by the notebook computer 20 are close enough to that of the exemplar image, go to block S 11 ; if not, go to block S 12 .

In block S 11 , a test pass result is presented.

In block S 12 , a failure result is presented.

Utilizing above described method, the image capturing function of other notebook computers in the product line can also be tested.

In the embodiment, the exemplar image file can be a single photo or an video file, and the notebook computer to be tested can take the same photo or video as the sample notebook computer did. Thus, a video capturing function and a photo capturing function of the notebook computer can be tested. The above described system and method can also be used to test other electronic devices, such as cell phones, PDAs, etc.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

While the present disclosure has been illustrated by the description of preferred embodiments thereof, and while the preferred embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not intended to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such details. Additional advantages and modifications within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the present disclosure is not limited to the specific details and illustrative examples shown and described.

It is also to be understood that the above description and the claims drawn to a method may include some indication in reference to certain steps. However, the indication used is only to be viewed for identification purposes and not as a suggestion as to an order for the steps.

Claims as granted

19 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N5/225
  • H04N17/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
348/187348/220.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.9 y
1,060 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Behrooz Senfi
art unit 2482 · TC 2400
Citations: 4 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock