USPatent applicationPatented

Lean kick catalyst monitoring system

Granted 4 Mar 2014 · 4 office actions

Application· this page
12/688,156
filed 15 Jan 2010
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 8,661,787
granted 4 Mar 2014

Life of the application

20 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method and system for monitoring a three-way catalyst cooled by a coolant and treating internal combustion engine exhaust by oxidizing HC and CO and reducing NO x is provided to prevent false-fail monitoring. An initial lean kick excursion of fuel-air ratio Phi is provided prior to the first reducing step or interval of the first cycle.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

The invention relates to three-way catalysts treating internal combustion engine exhaust, and more particularly to three-way catalysts cooled by a coolant.

Three-way catalysts cooled by a coolant are known in marine applications for treating internal combustion engine exhaust by oxidizing HC and CO and reducing NO x . Unlike automotive applications, such catalysts in marine applications are cooled by a coolant, e.g. cooling water from the lake or other body of water in which the marine vessel is operating, which cooling water flows through a jacket around the catalyst, i.e. coolant-jacketed.

The present invention arose during continuing development efforts directed toward improved accuracy of the monitoring of the cooled three-way catalyst, including oxygen storage capacity, OSC.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a marine internal combustion engine monitoring system known in the prior art.

FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating operation of the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is like FIG. 2 and illustrates the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
›Prior Art · 1 of 2

FIG. 1 shows a marine monitoring system 10 as known in the prior art for a three-way catalyst 12 treating exhaust from an internal combustion engine 14 by oxidizing HC and CO and reducing NO x . The catalyst is cooled by a coolant 11 , e.g. cooling water from the lake or other body of water in which the marine vessel is operating, which cooling water flows through a jacket 13 around the catalyst, whereby the catalyst is coolant-jacketed. A first oxygen sensor 16 senses oxygen in the exhaust upstream of catalyst 12 prior to treatment by the catalyst. A second oxygen sensor 18 senses oxygen in the exhaust downstream of catalyst 12 after treatment by the catalyst. The oxidization of HC and CO results in high concentrations of NO x . The reduction of NO x results in high concentrations of HC and CO. To optimize conversion efficiency, the fuel-air ratio, Phi, is maintained within a narrow window to ensure that the desired stoichiometric ratio is maintained. In this window, the reaction of fuel and air results in a complete or at least optimized burning of the carbon and hydrogen.

The three-way catalyst together with the upstream and downstream oxygen sensors provide a closed-loop control system for effectively removing or minimizing pollutants from the exhaust. When the fuel-air ratio Phi is lean, i.e. normalized Phi<1, the catalyst is able to store oxygen. This stored oxygen is used in the oxidization of HC and CO when the fuel-air mixture is rich, i.e. normalized Phi>1.

As the catalyst deteriorates, its ability to store oxygen is reduced. Accordingly, oxygen capacity of the catalyst is related to its operating efficiency. With an oxygen sensor before and after the catalyst, as at 16 and 18 , respectively, the oxygen storage capacity, OSC, of the catalyst can be determined, and accordingly its operating efficiency.

One known monitoring system measures oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst as a measure of operating efficiency of the catalyst by performing a two-step or two-interval open-loop control process. The first step or interval is a reducing step or interval adjusting fuel-air ratio Phi to a rich mixture with normalized Phi>1 to reduce stored oxygen in the catalyst, for example, catalyst diagnosis module 20 commands upstream ratio module 22 to alter the commands otherwise provided by ECU, electronic control unit, 24 (responsive to engine speed and engine load) and injection timing module 26 supplied through multiplier module 28 to fuel injectors 30 , all as is known. The first and second oxygen sensors 16 and 18 then register respective rich Phi readings. The second step or interval is an oxidizing step or interval adjusting fuel-air ratio Phi to a lean mixture with normalized Phi<1 to increase stored oxygen in the catalyst, with the first and second oxygen sensors registering respective lean Phi readings, which readings are supplied to the upstream and downstream ratio modules 22 and 32 and to diagnosis module 20 . The noted first and second steps or intervals are repeated over a plurality of cycles. This is illustrated in FIG. 2 showing a first cycle 34 having first and second steps or intervals 36 and 38 , second cycle 40 having first and second steps or intervals 42 and 44 , third cycle 46 having first and second steps or intervals 48 and 50 . During the first step (reducing step), the rich mixture is intended to ensure that the catalyst is saturated with HC and CO. If the readings from the oxygen sensors do not rise above and cross a rich threshold within a given time, the diagnostic is aborted and will re-initialize. After a specified number of unsuccessful attempts to the run the diagnostic, the system will abort and a flag will be set at fault processing module 52 which may also activate a malfunction indicator light, MIL, at 54 .

In the noted second step or interval, e.g. 38 , 44 , 50 , etc., a lean fuel-air mixture is flushed into the catalyst, and the amount of oxygen stored is calculated up to the point where oxygen can be noticed by the downstream oxygen sensor 18 . This is known as oxidizing. When all or substantially most of the oxygen has been adsorbed by the catalyst, oxygen break-through will be indicated by the reading of the downstream oxygen sensor falling below a minimum lean threshold. The OSC, oxygen storage capacity, of the catalyst can then be calculated based on the known exhaust air mass flow, fuel-air ratio, and the amount of time it took for oxygen to break through the catalyst, all as is known.

Present Application

The preferred embodiment of the present invention addresses and solves a problem identified during oxygen storage capacity monitoring in the above system, namely during the first step e.g. 36 of the first cycle e.g. 34 , the downstream oxygen sensor 18 reading would take extra time to reach the rich threshold target, e.g. 56 , or would not reach such target at all. This creates inconsistencies in the OSC results and in some cases causes a false-fail of the monitoring sensor check within the diagnostic. In FIG. 2 , the upstream oxygen sensor reading is shown at 58 , and the downstream oxygen sensor reading is shown at 60 . As seen in comparing first cycle 34 against subsequent cycles 40 , 46 , the response of downstream oxygen sensor 18 is sluggish during first cycle 34 , as shown at Phi reading 60 in first cycle 34 as compared to Phi reading 60 a in second cycle 40 , and Phi reading 60 b in third cycle 46 .

During investigation and development, it was recognized that a possible cause of the noted sluggishness and false-fail problem could be the cooling of the catalyst and/or the downstream oxygen sensor in the marine application involving a coolant-jacketed catalyst, which may also cool the downstream oxygen sensor. This problem is not an issue in automotive applications, which do not have coolant-jacketed catalysts.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present system, a possible solution was recognized and attempted by raising the exhaust gas temperature for the first step or interval 36 of the first cycle 34 . In the preferred embodiment, this is provided by an initial lean excursion or kick as shown at 62 in FIG. 3 . This was found to be successful because the Phi reading 60 c of downstream oxygen sensor 18 during the immediately succeeding first step or interval 36 of first cycle 34 did indeed cross and rise above rich threshold 56 . It is believed that implementation of the initial lean kick excursion at 62 increases the wall and gas temperatures of the catalyst 12 and/or downstream oxygen sensor 18 , prior to the first step or interval 36 of first cycle 34 , such that during first step or interval 36 of first cycle 34 , the downstream oxygen sensor 18 registers a higher Phi reading than without lean kick excursion 62 . It is believed that lean kick excursion 62 raises exhaust temperature immediately prior to first cycle 34 and overcomes cooling of the exhaust in the catalyst otherwise caused by cooling thereof by the coolant, e.g. by coolant-jacketed cooling thereof. It is believed that lean kick excursion 62 raises the operating temperature of downstream exhaust sensor 18 immediately prior to first cycle 34 to a temperature higher than that otherwise caused by cooling thereof by the coolant, e.g. by coolant-jacketed cooling of catalyst 12 . It is believed that lean kick excursion 62 raises the operating temperature of catalyst 12 prior to first cycle 34 and overcomes cooling of the catalyst otherwise caused by cooling thereof by the coolant, e.g. coolant-jacketed cooling thereof. Oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst may then be accurately determined by the length of time it takes the second oxygen sensor 18 to reach a given lean Phi reading after the beginning of the second step or interval, as above. The system may have application in various non-marine internal combustion engine implementations where a three-way catalyst is cooled by a coolant adversely impacting first cycle monitoring operation, e.g. as shown at 60 in FIG. 2 during step or interval 36 of first cycle 34 .

›Prior Art · 2 of 2

In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different configurations, systems, and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other configurations, systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims. The present system may be used in various alternate embodiments and applications, including marine applications, automotive applications, including trucks, and off-road vehicles, and other applications, and including various types of internal combustion engines, including gasoline, diesel, ethanol, etc., having a catalyst cooled by a coolant, which coolant may be various fluids, including liquid (e.g. water, glycol, etc.) and air, and including various cooling structures, including coolant jacketed catalysts, in various applications treating internal combustion engine exhaust.

Claims as granted

14 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F01N3/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
60/28560/32060/274

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionNon-final rejectionFinal rejection
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.1 y
1,509 days filing → grant
Office actions
4
non-final + final
Responses
4
1 RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Thomas Denion
art unit 3748 · TC 3700
Citations: 8 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock