USPatent applicationPatented

HARQ feedback channel indexing scheme in wireless communication systems

Granted 20 Nov 2012 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Apple Inc. · originally Intel Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Hujun Yin, Yi Hsuan, Yujian Zhang · Examiner: Scott Baderman · AU 2113 · TC 2100

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An enhanced semi-explicit solution for HARQ feedback channel indexing in wireless communication systems is disclosed. The HARQ feedback channel indexing method may be applied to the HARQ feedback channel transmitted in the downlink, as well as the HARQ feedback channel transmitted in the uplink.

Description

6 parts
›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to United States Provisional Patent Application Number 61/173,204, entitled, “ADVANCED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES”, filed on Apr. 28, 2009.

›TECHNICAL FIELD

This application relates to IEEE 802.16m and, more particularly, to Hybrid Automatic Repeat Requests (HARQ) under the IEEE standard.

›BACKGROUND

Hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) is widely supported in current state-of-the-art wireless communication standards. Under automatic repeat request (ARQ), error detection information is added to data before transmission, ensuring that the receiver is able to decode the data. With HARQ, additional forward error correction (FEC) bits are also added to the data.

Several wireless communication standards are defined by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), including 802.16e (broadband wireless access) and 802.16m (advanced air interface standard). IEEE 802.16e is referred to herein as “802.16e” or “broadband wireless access standard”; IEEE 802.16m is referred to herein as “802.16m” or “advanced air interface standard”.

During a HARQ operation, the HARQ feedback channel is used. A schematic depiction of the differences between the two standards for the HARQ feedback channel is depicted in FIG. 1 . The HARQ feedback channel carries either a positive acknowledgement (ACK) or a negative acknowledgement (NACK), depending on the decoding result of the data burst. For the 802.16e broadband wireless standard, the HARQ feedback channel is known as ACKCH 10 . For the 802.16m advanced air interface standard, the HARQ feedback channel is known as the HARQ feedback control channel 20 when transmitted in the uplink, and the HARQ Feedback A-MAP (HF-A-MAP) 30 when transmitted in the downlink.

In the current 802.16m standard, the advanced MAP (A-MAP) carries unicast service control information. Unicast service control information consists of user-specific control information and non-user-specific control information. User-specific control information is further divided into assignment information, HARQ feedback information, and power control information, transmitted in the assignment A-MAP 32 , HARQ feedback A-MAP 30 , and power control A-MAP 36 , respectively, as depicted in FIG. 2 . The HARQ feedback A-MAP 30 is the HARQ feedback channel under 802.16m in the downlink ( FIG. 1 ). Non-user-specific control information is transmitted in non-user-specific A-MAP 38 .

There is a set of HARQ feedback channel resources allocated and one method is needed to specify how to associate the HARQ feedback channel with the data burst, known as HARQ feedback channel indexing.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this document will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views, unless otherwise specified.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a HARQ feedback channel under both the broadband wireless access and advanced air interface standards, according to the prior art;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of channels used by the HARQ feedback channel indexing method, according to the prior art;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a HARQ feedback index parameter to be added to a non-user-specific A-MAP, used by the HARQ feedback channel index method of FIG. 2 , according to some embodiments;

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing operations of the HARQ feedback channel indexing method in implementing option A, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing operations of the HARQ feedback channel indexing method in implementing option B, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of base station and mobile station operation for HARQ feedback A-MAP in the downlink, according to some embodiments; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a HARQ feedback channel indexing apparatus, according to some embodiments.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

In accordance with the embodiments described herein, an enhanced semi-explicit solution for HARQ feedback channel indexing in wireless communication systems is disclosed. The HARQ feedback channel indexing method may be applied to the HARQ feedback channel transmitted in the downlink, as well as the HARQ feedback channel transmitted in the uplink.

There exist three approaches for HARQ feedback channel indexing: the explicit approach, the implicit approach, and the semi-explicit approach. Under the explicit approach, the full HARQ feedback channel index is specified within the set in downlink control signaling (the assignment A-MAP 32 for 802.16m). With the implicit approach, the HARQ feedback channel index is associated with some transmission parameters, but the index is not used in downlink control signaling. The associated transmission parameters may include a data burst resource index, a control channel index, and so on.

Using the semi-explicit approach involves signaling a partial HARQ feedback channel index, which combines with other transmission parameters to form the full HARQ feedback channel index. The benefit of the semi-explicit approach is that signaling overhead may be saved, as compared with the explicit approach.

The 802.16e standard supports both the explicit and the implicit approaches for obtaining the HARQ feedback channel index. In 802.16m, the HARQ feedback channel index may be determined by signaling the index explicitly, as one example. Such explicit signaling results in a large overhead in control signaling. The HARQ feedback channel indexing scheme provides an efficient way to transmit the HARQ feedback channel index with minimized control overhead.

FIG. 3 depicts the mechanics of a HARQ feedback channel indexing method 100 , according to some embodiments. The HARQ feedback channel indexing method 100 employs an added field in the non-user- specific control channel (non-user-specific A-MAP 38 for 802.16 m). In FIG. 3 , the non-user-specific A-MAP 38 (also in FIG. 2 ) is appended with a field 50 , known as a HARQ feedback index parameter (HFIP). The HFIP field 50 is used to indicate the choice of how to derive the HARQ feedback channel index based on selected transmission parameter(s) and the partial index signaled on downlink control signaling (assignment A-MAP 32 for 802.16 m). In some embodiments, the HFIP field 50 has N HFIP bits.

The choices provided in the HFIP 50 are focused on how to select and/or transform transmission parameters in the HARQ feedback channel index calculation. In some embodiments, there are two options for implementing the HFIP 50 . In a first option, known herein as option A, there are multiple transmissions parameters and the HFIP 50 indicates a subset of transmission parameters to use. In a second option, known herein as option B, a single transmission parameter is used and the HFIP 50 indicates which part of the single parameter is used.

In some embodiments, option A is further subdivided into options A 1 and A 2 . In option A 1 , one transmission parameter is selected as a baseline, such as, for example, the station identifier (STID) parameter. Under option A 1 , the selected baseline parameter is always used when calculating the HARQ feedback channel index. Thus, the HFIP field 50 is used to indicate the combination of other parameters to also be used in calculating the HARQ feedback channel index. One example of how the 2-bit HFIP 50 may be implemented is given in Table 1, below.

In this example, assume the value signaled in the HFIP 50 is j, and the corresponding parameter set, M(j)={m i }. In this example, the STID parameter is always used, the most significant bit (MSB) indicates whether the resource index parameter is used or not while the least significant bit (LSB) indicates whether the MCS parameter is used or not. For example, when the HFIP 50 is 2 (10 binary), the MSB is 1 and the LSB is 0, indicating that, in addition to the STID parameter being used, the resource index parameter is also used (but the MCS parameter is not used) to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index.

Alternatively, in option A 2 , no parameter is baseline. The HFIP 50 thus indicates the combination of all parameters used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index. A value of zero in the HFIP 50 may indicate that no parameter is used, or a zero value may indicate a special combination of parameters. One instance of using option A 2 to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index is illustrated in Table 2 below.

In this example, the MSB indicates whether the resource index parameter is used or not while the LSB indicates whether the STID parameter is used or not. For example, when the HFIP 50 value is 2 (10 binary), the MSB is 1 and the LSB is 0, therefore, the resource index parameter is used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index, but the STID parameter is not used. Note that a HFIP 50 of zero indicates that both the STID and MCS parameters are used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index.

Option B may be used when a single parameter is used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index, in some embodiments. In this case, the HARQ feedback channel index parameter indicates which part of a single transmission parameter is used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index. In Option B, assume that the STID parameter is used. In some embodiments, a right shift operator (>>) is used to select the part of the STID parameter used to calculate the HARQ feedback channel index. Right shift operation a>>b=└a/2 b ┘ where └x┘ is the floor of x, in other words, the largest integer less than or equal to x. For example, 15>>1=7, 15>>2=3. In Option B, assume the value of the HFIP 50 is j, then, STID>>(j*sf) can be used to select part of the STID parameter, where sf is the scaling factor, which may either be configured in the system or specified in the standard. Possible values for sf may be 1, 2, and so on.

For option A 1 described above, FIG. 4 shows a simple mechanism, using a modulo operation, for calculating the HARQ feedback channel index, in some embodiments. (Similarly, FIG. 5 shows the flow of calculations where option B is used.) For example, for the HARQ feedback A-MAP (HF-A-MAP) 30 transmitted in the downlink ( FIG. 1 ), assume that:

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

the partial HF-A-MAP index 40 signaled in the assignment A-MAP 32 is n (block 102 ) the total number of HF-A-MAPs configured is N HF-A-MAP (block 104 ) the HFIP 50 value is j (block 106 )

Then, an associated full HF-A-MAP index 300 is given by:

(P(j)+n) mod N HF-A-MAP ,

as shown in FIG. 4 (block 108 ), where (j) is a function of j and is used according to the options described above:

Option A:

P ⁡ ( j ) = ∑ i ⁢ ⁢ m ⁡ ( i ) ,

where set {m i } is selected base on the value j (block 112 )

Option B: P(j)=STID>>(j*sf)( FIG. 5 )

For example, assume that option A 1 is used, in other words, a full HF-A-MAP index 300 is calculated

( ∑ i ⁢ ⁢ m i + n ) ⁢ mod ⁢ N HF - A - MAP .

Assume N HF-A-MAP =16, j=2, n=1, the resource index parameter =15, and the STID parameter =334. Since j =2, the STID and resource index parameters are used to calculate a full HF-A-MAP index 300 according to Table 1. Therefore, using the above summation equation, the full HF-A-MAP index 300 is (15+334+1) mod 16=14.

Base station 70 and mobile station 80 operations for calculating the HF-A-MAP index 300 by the HARQ feedback channel indexing method 100 are illustrated schematically in FIG. 6 , according to some embodiments. In a first sub-frame, denoted sub-frame a, a base station 70 transmits the non-user-specific A-MAP 38 and the assignment A-MAP 32 to a mobile station 80 . The non-user-specific A-MAP 38 contains the HFIP field 50 while the assignment A-MAP 32 contains the partial HF-A-MAP index 40 . The mobile station 80 follows the scheduling in assignment A-MAP targeted for it and transmits uplink data in a subsequent sub-frame, denoted sub-frame b. According to the HFIP field 50 and the partial HF-A-MAP index 40 , both the base station 70 and the mobile station 80 may calculate a full HF-A-MAP index 300 according to methods described herein. Therefore, the base station 70 may transmit the associated HF-A-MAP according to the calculated index and the mobile station 80 then receives the said HF-A-MAP according to the calculated index 300 .

The HARQ feedback channel indexing method 100 thus provides a mechanism by which the index for the HARQ feedback channel is transmitted explicitly. By adding a single field in the non-user-specific control channel (the non-user-specific A-MAP 38 ), the choice of how to derive the HARQ feedback channel index is conveyed, based on selected transmission parameter(s) and the partial index signaled on the downlink control signaling (the partial HF-A-MAP index 40 in the assignment A-MAP 32 ). Current solutions do not permit different mechanisms for deriving the HARQ feedback channel index, as is proposed herein, in some embodiments.

The HARQ feedback channel indexing method provides an apparatus and method for HARQ feedback channel indexing in wireless communication systems. In some embodiments, apparatus would include a base station scheduler, a base station HF-A-MAP transmitter, a mobile station HF-A-MAP receiver, a mobile station HARQ feedback channel transmitter, and so on. In 802.16m, the HARQ feedback channel index should be determined. One way is to signal the index explicitly. However, this results in large overhead in control signaling. The HARQ feedback channel indexing method provides an efficient way to transmit HARQ feedback channel index with minimized control overhead.

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of a HARQ feedback channel indexing base station side apparatus 200 , according to some embodiments. Using an HF-A-MAP controller 65 , a non-user-specific A-MAP controller 70 , and an assignment A-MAP controller 75 , the base station scheduler 60 calculates and sets the values for the HFIP 50 , the partial HF-A-MAP index 40 , and related parts. The associated bits that make up the HF-A-MAP index 300 are then multiplexed by the multiplexer 80 and transmitted to the mobile station during downlink transmission.

While the application has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

›Tables in the description — 2
TABLE 1 — HARQ feedback index parameter - option A1 parameter set M(j)
2-bit HFIP jSTIDresourceMCS
00▪□□
01▪□▪
10▪▪□
11▪▪▪
TABLE 2 — HARQ feedback index parameter - option A2 parameter set M(j)
2-bit HFIP jSTIDresourceMCS
00▪□▪
01▪□□
10□▪□
11▪▪□

Claims as granted

17 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06F11/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
714/748714/749714/750

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.0 y
1,093 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Scott Baderman
art unit 2113 · TC 2100
Citations: 15 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock