USPatent applicationPatented

Imaging lens system and imaging module having same

Granted 27 Jul 2010 · no office action yet

Life of the application

6 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An imaging module includes an imaging lens system and an image sensor. The imaging lens system includes a first lens, a second lens, a third lens, and a fourth lens. The imaging module satisfies the formulas, 2.4<F 1 /TTL<3.0, −7.0<F 2 /TTL<−5.5, 0.95<F 3 /TTL<2.0, and −3.5<F 4 /TTL<−2.5, wherein the TTL is the distance from the object surface of the first lens to the sensing surface of the image sensor on the optical axis of the imaging lens system, the F 1 is the focal length of the first lens, the F 2 is the focal length of the second lens, the F 3 is the focal length of the third lens, and the F 4 is the focal length of the fourth lens.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

The disclosure relates to imaging lenses and, particularly, to an imaging lens system providing a high resolution and a reduced overall length and an imaging module having the same.

2. Description of Related Art

To optimize resolution and reduce size, imaging modules for use in thin devices, such as mobile phones or personal digital assistant (PDA), must employ an imaging lens system with a high resolution and a small overall length (the distance between the object-side surface of the imaging lens system and the image plane of the imaging module). However, in optical design of an imaging lens system, increasing resolution thereof commonly increases overall lens thereof.

Therefore, it is desirable to provide an imaging lens system and an imaging module using the system which can overcome the described limitations.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an imaging module in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a spherical aberration graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to a first exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a field curvature graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to the first exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a distortion graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to the first exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a spherical aberration graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to a second exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a field curvature graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to the second exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a distortion graph of the imaging module of FIG. 1 , according to the second exemplary embodiment.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present imaging module and imaging lens system will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

Referring to FIG. 1 , the imaging module 100 , according to an exemplary embodiment, is shown. The imaging module 100 includes an imaging lens system 10 and an image sensor 20 . The imaging lens system 10 includes, in the order from the object side to the image side thereof, a first lens 101 , a second lens 102 , a third lens 103 , and a fourth lens 104 . The first lens 101 and the third lens 103 provide positive refraction power. The image sensor 20 is aligned with the imaging lens system 10 and placed at the image side of the imaging lens system 10 . The second lens 102 and the fourth lens 104 provide negative refraction power. The image sensor 20 includes a sensing surface S 11 facing the imaging lens system 10 .

The first lens 101 includes a convex first surface S 1 facing the object side of the image lens system 10 , and a convex second surface S 2 facing the image side of the image lens system 10 . The first and second surfaces S 1 , S 2 are spherical.

The second lens 102 includes a convex third surface S 3 facing the object side of the image lens system 10 , and a concave fourth surface S 4 facing the image side of the image lens system 10 , thereby defining a meniscus shape of the second lens 102 . The third and fourth surfaces S 3 , S 4 are aspherical.

The third lens 103 includes a concave fifth surface S 5 facing the object side of the image lens system 10 , and a convex sixth surface S 6 facing the image side of the image lens system 10 , thereby defining a meniscus shape of the third lens 103 . The fifth and sixth surfaces S 5 , S 6 are aspherical.

The fourth lens 104 includes a convex seventh surface S 7 facing the object side of the image lens system 10 , and a concave eighth surface S 8 facing the image side of the image lens system 10 , thereby defining a meniscus shape of the fourth lens 104 . The seventh and eighth surfaces S 7 , S 8 are aspherical.

In order to obtain an imaging module 100 that has a high resolution and a reduced overall length, the imaging module 100 satisfies the formulas:

2.4 <F 1/ TTL< 3.0,  (1)

−7.0 <F 2/ TTL<− 5.5,  (2)

0.95 <F 3/ TTL< 2.0, and  (3)

−3.5 <F 4/ TTL<− 2.5,  (4)

where TTL is the distance from the first surface S 1 to the sensing surface S 11 on the optical axis of the imaging lens system 10 , F 1 is the focal length of the first lens 101 , F 2 is the focal length of the second lens 102 , F 3 is the focal length of the third lens 103 , and the F 4 is the focal length of the fourth lens 104 .

Formulas (1)-(4) are for reducing overall length of the imaging module 100 .

The imaging module 100 further satisfies the formula: (5) −0.5<R 2 /R 1 <0.5, where R 1 is the radius of curvature of the first surface S 1 , R 2 is the radius of curvature of the second surface S 2 . Formula (5) is for correcting the distortion of the imaging module 100 , and increasing the refractive power of the first lens 101 .

The imaging module 100 further satisfies the formulas: (6) 1.7<EFL/F 1 <2.0, (7) −1.85<EFL/F 2 <−1.5, (8) 1.7<EFL/F 3 <2.0, and (9) −0.4<EFL/F 4 <−0.2, where EFL is the effective focal length of the imaging lens system 10 . Formulas (6)-(9) are for correcting the aberration (i.e., spherical aberration, field curvature, and distortion) of the imaging module 100 .

The imaging module 100 further satisfies the formulas: (10) 1.6<Nd 2 <1.8, and (11) Vd 2 <30, where Nd 2 is the index of refraction of the second lens 102 , Vd 2 is the Abbe number of the second lens 102 . Formulas (10)-(11) are for correcting the chromatic aberration of the imaging module 100 .

The imaging module 100 further satisfies the formula: (12) T 2 <2.5 mm, where T 2 is the distance from the fourth surface S 4 to the fifth surface S 5 on the optical axis of the imaging lens system 10 . Formula (12) is for reducing overall length of the imaging module 100 .

The imaging module 100 further includes an aperture stop 30 . The aperture stop 30 is positioned at the object side of the first lens 101 and is configured to prevent too much off-axis light rays entering the first lens 101 . Also, positioning the aperture stop 30 at the object side of the first lens 101 is beneficial for reducing the overall length of the imaging module 100 .

The imaging module 100 also includes a cover glass 40 , which is positioned between the image lens system 10 and the image sensor 20 for protecting the sensing area (not labeled) of the image sensor 20 . The cover glass 40 includes an object side surface S 9 and an image surface S 10 .

The first lens 101 is made of glass, convenient for correcting the imaging aberration and increasing the resolution of the imaging module 100 . The second lens 102 , the third lens 103 , and fourth lenses 104 can be made of plasticm to reduce cost, and all have two aspherical surfaces (i.e., the aspherical object-side surface and the aspherical image-side surface) to efficiently correct aberrations. The aspherical surface is shaped according to the formula:

x = ch 2 1 + 1 - ( k + 1 ) ⁢ c 2 ⁢ h 2 + ∑ A ⁢ ⁢ i ⁢ ⁢ h i , ⁢

where h is a height from the optical axis of the imaging module 100 to the aspherical surface, c is a vertex curvature, k is a conic constant, and Ai are i-th order correction coefficients of the aspherical surfaces.

Detailed examples of the imaging module 100 are given below in company with FIGS. 2-7 , but it should be noted that the imaging module 100 is not limited by these examples. Listed below are the symbols used in these detailed examples:

TTL: distance from the first surface to the sensing surface on the optical axis of the imaging module;

EFL: effective focal length of the imaging module;

R: radius of curvature;

D: distance between surfaces on the optical axis of the lens;

Nd: refractive index of lens; and

Vd: Abbe constant.

When capturing an image, incident light enters the imaging lens system 10 , sequentially transmits through four lenses 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , the cover glass 40 , and is finally focused onto the image sensor 20 .

›Example 1

Tables 1, 2 show the lens data of Example 1, wherein TTL=10.1 mm, EFL=7.8 mm.

The spherical aberration graph, the field curvature graph, and the distortion graph of the image module 100 of Example 1 are respectively shown in FIGS. 2˜4 . Spherical aberrations of line f (λ=486 nm) and line d (λ=587 nm) and line c (λ=656 nm) are shown in FIG. 2 . Generally, spherical aberration of visible light (with a wavelength between 400˜700 nm) of the image module 100 in the Example 1 is within a range of −0.05 mm to 0.05 mm. The sagittal field curvature and tangential field curvature shown in FIG. 3 are kept within a range of −0.20 mm to 0.20 mm. The distortion in FIG. 4 falls within a range of −2% to 2%. Obviously, the spherical aberration, field curvature, and distortion are well controlled in the Example 1 of the image module 100 .

›Example 2

Tables 3, 4 show the lens data of EXAMPLE 2, wherein TTL=10.4 mm, EFL=7.7 mm.

The spherical aberration graph, the field curvature graph, and the distortion graph of the image module 100 of Example 2 are respectively shown in FIGS. 5˜7 . Spherical aberrations of line f (λ=486 nm) and line d (λ=587 nm) and line c (λ=656 nm) are shown in FIG. 5 . Generally, spherical aberration of visible light (with a wavelength between 400˜700 nm) of the image module 100 in the Example 1 is within a range of −0.05 mm to 0.05 mm. The sagittal field curvature and tangential field curvature shown in FIG. 6 are kept within a range of −0.10 mm to 0.10 mm. The distortion in FIG. 7 falls within a range of −2% to 2%. Obviously, the spherical aberration, field curvature, and distortion are well controlled in the Example 2 of the image module 100 .

In summary, according to examples 1-2, though the overall length of the imaging module 100 is reduced, aberrations are controlled/corrected within an acceptable range.

It will be understood that the above particular embodiments and methods are shown and described by way of illustration only. The principles and the features of the disclosure may be employed in various and numerous embodiment thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as claimed. The above-described embodiments illustrate the scope of the invention but do not restrict the scope of the invention.

›Tables in the description — 4
TABLE 1
surfaceR (mm)D (mm)NdVd
S13.3778060.888981.8270626.269
S2−61.55780.25245——
S328.672580.601.63200023.42
S42.9052632.47988——
S5−2.454350.961491.5304755.34
S6−1.818970.1——
S75.5525531.251.5304755.34
S83.7771452.68——
TABLE 2
SurfaceAspherical coefficient
S3k = 0; A4 = 0; A6 = −0.00765; A8 = 0.00364; A10 = −0.00185; A12 = 0.00062
S4k = 0; A4 = 0; A6 = −0.00390; A8 = 0.00387; A10 = -0.00133; A12 = 0.00050
S5k = 0.18103; A4 = −0.01161; A6 = −0.00126; A8 = −0.00139; A10 = 0.00083; A12 = 0.00009
S6k = −0.50059; A4 = 0.00354; A6 = 0.00171;A8 = −0.00039; A10 = −0.00073; A12 = 0.00013
S7k = −22.1089; A4 = 0; A6 = 0.00744; A8 = 0.00139; A10 = −0.00013; A12 = 0.0000042
S8k = −11.2325; A4 = 0; A6 = −0.01595; A8 = 0.00140; A10 = −0.00008; A12 = 0.0000016
TABLE 3
surfaceR (mm)D (mm)NdVd
S13.8876671.671.82705726.269
S2−9.2312080.13——
S3−7.4999590.601.60726526.640
S44.2260312.37——
S5−2.4543530.911.53113155.753900
S6−1.8189730.1——
S75.5525531.371.53113155.753900
S83.530992.42——
TABLE 4
SurfaceAspherical coefficient
S3k = 0; A4 = 0; A6 = 0.00020; A8 = −0.00107; A10 = 0.00131; A12 = −0.00045
S4k = 0; A4 = 0; A6 = 0.00078; A8 = 0.00294; A10 = −0.00135; A12 = 0.00056
S5k = 0.18103; A4 = −0.00582; A6 = 0.00316; A8 = −0.00766; A10 = 0.00114; A12 = 0.00028
S6k = −0.50059; A4 = −0.00446; A6 = 0.00710; A8 = −00005; A10 = −0.00078; A12 = 0.00024
S7k = −24.0474; A4 = 0; A6 = −0.00321; A8 = 0.00113; A10 = −0.00011; A12 = 0.000003
S8k = −11.2325; A4 = 0; A6 = −0.01242; A8 = 0.00119; A10 = −0.00005; A12 = 0.0000007

Claims as granted

17 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G02B9/34
USPC · US Patent Classification
359/773359/771359/754

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2009Jul 2009Oct 2009Jan 2010Apr 2010Jul 2010USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.3 y
459 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Darryl J Collins
art unit 2873 · TC 2800
Citations: 4 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock