USPatent applicationPatented

Method for vapor phase pulping with alcohol and sulfur dioxide

Granted 18 Sep 2012 · 3 office actions

Life of the application

18 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom200820102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method for the fractionation of lignocellulosic materials into cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin in a batch or continuous process in a treatment with vaporous mixture of aliphatic alcohol, sulfur dioxide and water. Cooking conditions are varied to get different proportions of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Chemical recovery through pressure release is described.

Description

5 parts
›CONTINUATION

This is a continuation of provisional patent application No. 61/064,744

›DESCRIPTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates, in general, to the fractionation of lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses, under vaporous cooking chemicals. In particular, alcohol sulfite vapors are applied to separate wood chips into cellulose fibers and dissolved lignin and hemicelluloses in an integrated biorefinery process.

2. Background of the Invention

Fractionation technologies of lignocellulosic material into its main subcomponents of cellulose, lignin and hemicelluloses have existed both in commercial practice and at the research level. Two examples are commercial sulfite pulping and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL, clean fractionation technology research.

Commercial sulfite pulping has been practiced since 1874. Industrial variants using calcium, magnesium, sodium and ammonia were developed by the 1940's.

Sulfite pulping produces spent cooking liquor termed sulfite liquor. Fermentation of sulfite liquor to hemicellulosic ethanol has been practiced primarily to reduce the environmental impact of the discharges from sulfite mills since 1909. In particular, a mill in Temiscaming, Ontario further ferments the sugars in ammonium sulfite spent liquor and sells the leftover lignosulfonates. Published design data from one of the two known remaining sulfite mills that produce ethanol, shows ethanol yields not to exceed 33% of the original hemicelluloses in wood. Ethanol yield is low due to the incomplete hydrolysis of the hemicelluloses and because only six carbon sugars are fermented, and further is further limited by the presence of sulfite pulping side products, such as furfural, methanol, acetic acid and others which inhibit fermentation to ethanol

Because of poor ethanol yield, lower cost of synthetic ethanol production from oil feed stock, and the production of ethanol from corn today, only two sulfite mills are known to have continued the practice of hemicellulosic ethanol production to date.

In the mid 20 th century, Kraft pulping had eclipsed sulfite pulping as the dominant chemical pulping method. Kraft pulping however does not fractionate lignocellulosic material into its primary components. Instead, hemicelluloses are degraded in a strong solution of sodium hydroxide with or without sodium sulfide and lignin.

Vapor phase Kraft pulping is taught by Richter et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 3,532,594 Oct. 6, 1970). Inorganic cooking chemicals used for Kraft pulping must be impregnated in a separate vessel prior to vapor phase cooking. Additional cooking chemicals are then provided by fine spray to the cooking vessel to maintain appropriate chemical charge.

Solvent cooking chemicals have been tried as an alternative to Kraft or sulfite pulping. The original solvent process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 1,856,567 by Kleinert et al. Although three demonstration size facilities for ethanol-water (ALCELL), alkaline sulfite with anthraquinone and methanol (ASAM), and ethanol-water-sodium hydroxide (Organocell) were operated briefly in the 1990's, today there are no full scale solvent pulping mills. Of these technologies only ALCELL produced native reactive lignin by the use of pure aqueous organic solvents in elevated thermodynamic conditions. Lora, et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,948, Feb. 2, 1999) taught us that woodchips can be presteamed with a solvent present. The bulk delignification itself done in liquid phase under 6-9 parts of solvent liquid to one part of wood.

Gordy taught us pulping process to digest wood in vapors of sulfur dioxide and ammonia (U.S. Pat. No. 4,259,147, Mar. 31, 1981). Different grade pulps could be produced varying time from 10 to 60 minutes.

Groombridge et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 2,060,068 shows that an aqueous solvent with sulfur dioxide is a potent delignifying system to produce cellulose from lignocellulosic material. Their process was limited to 9% concentration of sulfur dioxide in the liquid phase.

Finally, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,837 to Black et al. claims liquid phase fractionation of lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and dissolved sugars using ketone, alcohol, water and mineral acid. This is more readily known as the NREL clean fractionation technology. The separation of lignin and sugars in two immiscible layers are noted.

The present inventors have found pulping in aqueous alcohol solution with high concentration of sulfur dioxide leads to rapid solubilization of lignin and hemicelluloses. The concentration of sulfur dioxide is limited by solubility of sulfur dioxide at about 10% (w/w) in aqueous solution and 25% in ethanol solutions at room temperature. The solubility decreases rapidly at higher temperatures, making a commercial practice at very high concentration difficult.

Therefore in the prior art of digesting lignocellulosic material:

a) The sulfite processes take a long time to produce cellulose because of the low free sulfur dioxide charge and the slow diffusion of the counter cations. b) The Kraft process requires pre immersion to facilitate cooking chemical penetration to wood chips using water as a solvent. c) Organic solvent pulping methods used generally high solvent to wood ratios to facilitate delignification. d) Gaseous ammonia—sulfur dioxide pulping is an effective pulping medium. e) Alcohol sulfite liquid phase pulping is limited by the reverse solubility of sulfur dioxide in liquids at higher temperatures.

Surprisingly, the current inventors found the delignification rate to be approximately equal in vapor phase cooking. This discovery enables higher sulfur dioxide concentration applied on the wood chips, which speeds delignification and reduces cellulose degradation. Furthermore the cooking in vapor phase may improve the process economy by reducing the amount of cooking liquor charged to bulky wood chips and be suitable for dry and wet material.

The present inventors have now developed a process for the treatment of lignocellulosic material which produces pulp, fractionates the material and then converts each fraction into a reactive chemical feedstock. This is achieved through cooking lignocellulosic material with vapor phase with sulfur dioxide and ethanol. This can be done in a batch or continuous process.

›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention describes a process of fractionating lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and hydrolyzed hemicelluloses through a vapor phase cooking with an aliphatic alcohol and sulfur dioxide. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the wood chips are digested in pressurized vessel with low liquor volume, so that the cooking space is filled with ethanol and sulfur dioxide vapor in equilibrium with wood moisture. The cooked wood chips are washed in alcohol rich solution to recover lignin and dissolved hemicelluloses, while the remaining pulp is further processed to cellulose and paper products.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 . Illustrates a flow sheet example of the vapor phase pulping process, noting that the process steps may be in other sequences.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A process for fractionating lignocellulosic material in to chemically reactive components through vapor phase cooking of lignocellulosic material with gases of aliphatic alcohol, water, and sulfur dioxide comprising the steps of:

Charging wood chips, with approximate dimensions of 1″×½″×⅛″, in a pressurized vessel.

Filling the vessel partially with gaseous or aqueous solution of sulfur dioxide and ethanol separately or together.

Heating the vessel by direct steam injection or indirectly heating the cooling solution until most of the solution is in vapor phase of the digester.

Relieving the pressure in digester and recovering excess cooking chemicals for reuse.

Pumping or blowing the digested wood chips through a valve along with dilution to obtain a pulp suspension of certain consistency in a storage tank.

Washing to separate lignin and hemicelluloses from cellulose pulp in several stages.

The first process step is “cooking”, element 1 in FIG. 2 , which fractionates the lignocellulosic material components to allow easy downstream removal; specifically lignin and hemicelluloses are dissolved. Cellulose is separated but remains resistant to hydrolysis. Lignin is partially sulfonated rendering it alcohol and water soluble form. Lignocellulosic material is processed, “cooked”, in a vapor phase of aliphatic alcohol, water, and sulfur dioxide where typical ratios by weight are 40-60% of both aliphatic alcohol and water, and 9-50% of sulfur dioxide, and preferably 40% aliphatic alcohol, 40% water and 20% sulfur dioxide; this solution is termed cooking liquor. Aliphatic alcohols can include ethanol, methanol, propanol and butanol, but preferably ethanol. The cooking may be performed in one or more stages using batch or continuous digesters. Depending on the lignocellulosic material to be processed, the cooking conditions are varied, with temperatures from 65° C. to 160° C., for example 65° C., 75° C., 85° C., 95° C., 105° C., 115° C., 125° C., 130° C. 135° C., 140° C. 145° C., 150° C., 155, 160° C. and corresponding pressures from 1 atmosphere to 20 atmospheres. The sulfur dioxide charge in the cooking liquor is varied between 9% and 50%, for example 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19,%, 20% 25%, 30, 35%, 40, 45% and 50% of the total cooking liquor mass in one or more cooking stages. Cooking time of each stage is also varied between 1 minutes and 180 minutes, for example 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 140, 160, 180 minutes. The lignocellulosic material to cooking liquor ratio can is varied between 1:1 to 1:4, for example, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, or 1:4, and preferably 1:2.

Hydrolyzate from the cooking step is subjected to pressure reduction, either at the end of a cook in a batch digester, or in an external flash tank after extraction from a continuous digester. The flash vapor from the pressure reduction is collected and recompressed for reuse in the digester vessel. The flash vapor contains substantially all the unreacted sulfur dioxide. The cellulose is then removed to be washed and further treated as required.

The process washing step, element 2 in FIG. 1 , recovers the hydrolyzate from the cellulose. Cellulose removed in the washing step can be diverted for papermaking or in a preferred embodiment can be bleached into paper furnish.

In an another embodiment of the invention, air dry or fresh wood chips are contacted with a solution of ethanol and water and SO2 in a digester, followed by drainage of the cooking liquor and then vapor phase cooking by direct injection of steam and/or ethanol vapor at a temperature and pressure to obtain the desired cooking temperature.

Although other modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.

Claims as granted

15 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section D — Textiles; paper
  • D21C3/20
  • D21C3/06
USPC · US Patent Classification
162/83162/72162/77162/82

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.5 y
1,275 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
3
1 RCE
Examiner
Anthony Calandra
art unit 1741 · TC 1700
Citations: 13 back · 17 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2012201420162018202020222024202620282030Owner 2Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienhover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock