Stripper for dry film removal
Granted 22 Jan 2013 · 2 office actions
Current assignee: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany · originally Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Matthew I. Egbe, Wen Dar Liu, Archie Liao, Chimin Sheu +3 · Examiner: Gregory Webb · AU 1761 · TC 1700
Life of the application
15 dated eventsAbstract
The present invention, in a preferred embodiment, is a photoresist stripper formulation, comprising: Hydroxylamine ; Water; a solvent selected from the group consisting of dimethylsulfoxide; N-methylpyrrrolidine; dimethylacetamide; dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether; monoethanolamine and mixtures thereof; a base selected from the group consisting of choline hydroxide, monoethanolamine, tetramethylammonium hydroxide; aminoethylethanolamine and mixtures thereof; a metal corrosion inhibitor selected from the group consisting of catechol, gallic acid, lactic acid, benzotriazole and mixtures thereof; and a bath life extending agent selected from the group consisting of glycerine, propylene glycol and mixtures thereof. The present invention is also a method for using formulations as exemplified in the preferred embodiment.
Description
9 parts›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This Application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 61/034,592, filed on Mar. 7, 2008.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the manufacture of semiconductor circuits on wafers, the wafers are periodically coated with photoresist to fabricate the various layers of circuitry, electrical devices and vias and interconnects. After photoresist is developed and used, etching and ashing are performed resulting in residues that must be removed before further processing. Strippers have been utilized to remove unwanted photoresist and the residues of etching and ashing. The photoresist, etch residue or ash residue is difficult to selectively remove without damaging the desired circuit structures. The stripper must be compatible with dielectric and metal conductive materials. The corrosion rate of either of these differing types of materials must be within acceptable levels.
Commercially available strippers for the application of thick dry film (usually range from 70 to 120 micrometer (micron (μm))) removal comprise a mixture of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH). These strippers usually operate at elevated temp (>90° C.) and suffer from short bath-life issues. Strippers in this field are described in U.S. 2005/0263743, U.S. 2006/0094613 and U.S. 2006/0115970.
›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a photoresist stripper formulation for removing photoresist, etch residue or ash residue from a semiconductor device surface, comprising
Hydroxylamine;
Water;
A solvent selected from the group consisting of dimethylsulfoxide; N-methylpyrrrolidine; dimethylacetamide; dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether; monoethanolamine and mixtures thereof;
A base selected from the group consisting of choline hydroxide, monoethanolamine, tetramethylammonium hydroxide; aminoethylethanolamine and mixtures thereof;
A metal corrosion inhibitor selected from the group consisting of catechol, gallic acid, lactic acid, benzotriazole and mixtures thereof; and
A bath life extending agent selected from the group consisting of glycerine, propylene glycol and mixtures thereof.
The present invention is also a method of stripping photoresist, etch residue or ash residue using the above formulation.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 are the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images showing the cleaning performance using the formulation in Table 2.
FIG. 2 are the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images showing the copper loss within the 75 hours test period, when the formulation in Table 2 is used.
FIG. 3 are the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images showing the active bath life over the 75 hours test period, when the formulation in Table 2 is used.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Photoresist stripper formulations have been used in this field, but currently these formulations suffer from high copper conductor etch rates and shorter photoresist stripper active bath-life and undesirable operating temperatures.
A new photoresist stripper was developed for the application of dry film removal in the present invention. In order to improve such issue, a series of tests were performed and several key components were found strongly related to dry film removal and copper protection. Compared with commercial strippers used for dry film cleaning, this stripper can be used under milder conditions (preferably 60° C. for 30 minutes) and has comparable cleaning performance and copper conductive line etch rate. Furthermore, the active bath-life is significantly improved in the present invention.
The formulation in the present invention has some distinct features:
1. The stripper of the present invention shows good cleanability of the dry film at 60° C. for 30 minutes without agitation; 2. Cross-section of the substrate processed with the present stripper, checked by Scanning Electron Microscopy( SEM), also shows copper loss is less than 10% within the 75 hours test period; 3. Bath-life of the stripper of the present invention is higher than 75 hours at 60°C.
›WORKING EXAMPLES
In the working examples, the following abbreviations have been used:
TMAH=tetramethylammonium hydroxide; DMSO=dimethylsulfoxide; HA=hydroxylamine; NMP=N-methylpyrrrolidine; DMAC=dimethylacetamide; DPM=dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether; MEA=monoethanolamine; AEEA=aminoethylethanolamine; DIW=deionized water; BZT=benzotriazole.
›Examples3
›Example 1
The present photoresist stripper formulation was prepared in accordance with Table 1, below.
An embodiment of the resulting photoresist stripper formulation of the present invention has a compositional makeup as set forth in Table 2, showing preferred ranges of compositional content for a preferred embodiment.
The preferred embodiment of Table 2 was tested on a discretely patterned film on a substrate (a dry film) under process conditions of 60° C. for 30 minutes. The excellent cleaning performance was clearly shown from the SEM scanning images shown in FIG. 1 .
Variations in the photoresist formulations of the present invention are contemplated and including, but are not limited to the analogs listed in Table 3, below.
›Example 2
The preferred embodiment of Table 2 was tested on a copper film on a substrate under a process condition of 60° C. and for the time intervals shown in Table 4, below.
The Cu loss was checked by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The SEM data was shown in FIG. 2 .
The data both in FIG. 2 and in Table 4 demonstrates that this embodiment of the stripper formulation of the present invention shows acceptable levels of copper etch over a wide range of time of exposure. The copper loss was less than 10% within the 75 hours test period.
›Example 3
The preferred embodiment of Table 2 was tested on a discretely patterned film on a substrate under process conditions of 60° C. and for the time intervals of 20 hours, 27 Hours, 45 Hours, and 75 Hours. The SEM images were shown in FIG. 3 . Table 5 below shows the visual determination of effective bath life based upon removal of film from patterned geometry from the images.
The results in Table 5 show that the active bath life of the stripper of the present invention as exemplified by the embodiment of Table 2 has effective stripping ability over the span of 75 hours.
Additional examples of the base include benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide, dimethyldiethylammonium hydroxide, ethytrimethylammonium hydroxide, methytriethylammonium hydroxide, tetrabutyammonium hydroxide tetraethylammonium hydroxide, tetrapropylammonium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide with analogous organic groups replacing hydrogen on the ammonium group, such as alkyl and aryl groups including various combinations of methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, and hexyl.
The working examples have shown that a new photoresist stripper was developed for the application of dry film removal. Several key components were found strongly related to dry film removal and copper protection. Hydroxylamine in the stripping formulation reacts with dry film and increases the solubility allowing significantly reduced process temperatures, typically down to 60° C.; glycerine and/or glycerol slows down DIW evaporizing speed and prolongs the bath-life; and catechol prevents copper corrosion.
The stripping formulations have demonstrated stripping effect on a discretely patterned film on a substrate (a dry film) in the working examples. However, it should be understood that the stripping formulations can be used to remove photoresist, and residues left from etching and ashing processes from any semiconductor device surface.
While specific embodiments have been described in details, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teaching of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular embodiments disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limitings to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breath of the appended claims and any all equivalents thereof.
›Tables in the description — 5
| Addition | Raw Material- | 500 g | Max. temp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order | Pilot Plant | Wt. Pct | scale | (° C.) |
| 1 | Water | 5.72% | 28.6 | 24 |
| 2 | TMAH (25% | 22.87% | 114.35 | 24 |
| solution) | ||||
| 3 | DMSO | 57.18% | 285.9 | 37 |
| 4 | HA (50%) | 8.26% | 41.3 | 39 |
| 5 | Glycerine | 5.40% | 27 | 37 |
| 6 | Catechol | 0.57% | 2.85 | 37 |
| Component | Preferred Embodiment | Range |
|---|---|---|
| DMSO | 57.18 | 10% |
| TMAH (25%) | 22.87 | 10% |
| HA (50%) | 8.26 | 10% |
| DIW | 5.72 | 10% |
| Glycerine | 5.40 | 10% |
| Catechol | 0.57 | 5% |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Composition | Analogs |
| DMSO | NMP, DMAC, DPM, MEA, etc. |
| TMAH (25%) | Choline hydroxide, MEA, AEEA, etc. |
| HA (50%) | |
| DIW | |
| Glycerine | propylene glycol |
| Catechol | Gallic acid, Lactic acid, BZT, etc. |
| Time | Copper Etch in Angstroms |
|---|---|
| Control | 4830 |
| 0 Hours | 4440 |
| 20 Hours | 4617 |
| 27 Hours | 4611 |
| 45 Hours | 4782 |
| 75 Hours | 4440 |
| Time | High Definition* | Medium Definition* | Low Definition* |
| 0 Hours | X | ||
| 20 Hours | X | ||
| 27 Hours | X | ||
| 45 Hours | X | ||
| 75 Hours | X |
Claims as granted
10 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
4 codes- B08B3/00
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock