USPatent applicationPatented

Rotor blade, method for producing a rotor blade, and compressor with a rotor blade

Granted 4 Sep 2012 · 1 office action

Assignee: General Electric

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Thomas Mueller · Examiner: Thinh T Nguyen · AU 2897 · TC 2800

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A rotor blade for fastening on the rotor of a turbomachine, especially of a compressor of a gas turbine, has a blade airfoil and a blade root ( 15 ) which adjoins the lower end of the blade airfoil and extends along a blade axis and by which the rotor blade, in an encompassing slot which is arranged on the outer periphery of the rotor, is retained between two spacers ( 12, 18 ) which follow each other in the circumferential direction and which in their turn are retained in the slot. The blade root ( 15 ) is formed with a T-shape in cross section and includes circumferential shoulders ( 16, 16 ′) which fit under the adjacent spacers ( 12, 18 ), and the spacers ( 12, 18 ), in the direction of the blade axis, engage by retaining surfaces ( 20 ) in undercuts ( 24 ) in the slot. Reduced production cost with comparable service life is achieved by the T-shaped blade root ( 15 ) being milled, and, for reducing the mechanical stresses at the transitions of the blade root ( 15 ) to the shoulders ( 16, 16 ′), by a relief groove ( 21 ), which extends in the direction of the blade axis.

Description

6 parts
›This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119…

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Swiss application No. 01527/07, filed 1 Oct. 2007, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.

›BACKGROUND

1. Field of Endeavor

The present invention relates to the field of turbomachines. It relates to a rotor blade for fastening on the rotor of a turbomachine, to a method for producing a rotor blade, and also to a compressor with such a rotor blade.

2. Brief Description of the Related Art

The rotor blades of a compressor are part of an axial compressor system which moves and compresses large quantities of air which are required for the correct and reliable operation of a gas turbine system. The rotor blades are mounted on the outer periphery of the rotor of the compressor and are subjected to a large number of mechanical loads which especially also depend upon the type of blade fastening.

In order to reliably avoid the detachment of a rotor blade from the rotor, which is catastrophic for the system, various systems have been developed and proposed in the past for fastening the rotor blades on the rotor. One of these systems, to which the present invention relates, is the fastening system with a T-shaped blade root and spacers, as is reproduced in detail in a simplified form in FIGS. 1 and 2 , and in FIG. 6 , and which has been known for a long time for example from publication DE-PS-318 662.

In the case of this system, spacers 12 , 18 are inserted one behind the other in the circumferential direction in a slot 11 which extends around the rotor axis (A 2 in FIG. 5 ) of the rotor 10 and are retained in the slot 11 by retaining surfaces 20 which abut against undercuts 24 . A rotor blade 13 or 27 is arranged in each case between two adjacent spacers 12 , 18 and includes a blade airfoil 14 , and by a T-shaped blade root 15 or 25 (see FIG. 6 ) which adjoins the blade airfoil 14 at the bottom and abuts against the side surfaces of the adjacent spacers 12 , 18 , and by shoulders 16 , 16 ′ or 26 , 26 ′ which project in the circumferential direction and fit under the adjacent spacers 12 , 18 . The spacers 12 , 18 and the rotor blades 13 or 27 in this case are arranged at an angle to the rotor axis A 2 , so that the blade axis (A 1 in FIG. 5 ) with the rotor axis A 2 includes an angle of, for example, 25° (see FIG. 5 ).

The T-shaped blade roots 25 of the compressor rotor blades 27 have previously been formed (forged) by upset forging and so have obtained a grain structure which determines the strength, as is indicated in FIG. 6 by broken lines. In recent times, dependent upon new requirements with regard to costs, tools, and logistics, the changeover is increasingly being made to no longer forging the blade roots but producing the blade roots by milling (grain structure in FIG. 4 ). In order to achieve the same or an improved strength at the critical transitions to the shoulders 16 , 16 ′ or 26 , 26 ′ in the case of the milled blade roots, as in the case of the forged blade roots, a larger radius has to be provided at the transitions. In the case of the forged blade roots 25 , the forged radius 29 lies approximately in the region of between 0.5 and 1.0 mm ( FIG. 6 ). On account of the notch factor, milled blade roots require at the transitions a radius which is about 1.5 to 2 times larger than the forged radius 29 .

The previous forging method for the blade roots 25 had further consequences: as a result of the upset forging, bulges 31 occur on the shank above the shoulders 26 , 26 ′ (in FIG. 6 this is indicated by the dotted lines) which lie within the range of 0.3 to 0.5 mm. So that the rotor blades installed with the forged blade roots 25 , despite the side bulges 31 , nevertheless abut securely and immovably against the adjacent spacers 12 , 18 , they are provided with a long chamfer 17 , 19 on the side surfaces in the lower section, which creates the space for the bulges 31 (see also FIG. 3 ).

Although, depending upon the blade size, a 0.3 to 0.5 mm wide gap already exists between the adjacent spacers 12 , 18 and the T-shaped blade root 25 , an increase of the radius in the corners of the shoulders 26 , 26 ′ by the factor 1.5 to 2, as is required for milled blade roots, would cause an undesirable and hazardous collision exactly at the place where the relief of mechanical stresses actually should be the aim.

It is possible, on the other hand, to relieve mechanical stresses in the regions of machine parts in which, on the one hand, the risk of cracks is great, and on the other hand the space for the applying of larger radii, however, is limited, by providing suitably dimensioned and positioned relief grooves, according to ISO standard.

›SUMMARY

One of numerous aspects of the present invention includes a rotor blade with a T-shaped blade root, of the type mentioned in the introduction, in a form so that it can be more favorably produced and yet achieves the service life which is customary for forged blade roots, and also to disclose a method for its production.

Another aspect of the present invention includes that the T-shaped blade root is milled, and that for reducing the mechanical stresses at the transitions of the blade root to the shoulders, a relief groove, which extends in the axial direction, is provided in each case. The compressor according to the invention has a rotor which is fitted with rotor blades according to the invention.

In principle, the relief groove can be a standard relief groove according to ISO standard. In particular, the relief groove is then a relief groove of type E or F according to DIN standard 509.

It is especially advantageous with regard to the reduction of the mechanical stresses if the spacers have a chamfer in each case on their side surfaces which are adjacent to the blade root, and if the relief groove has an increased height which deviates from a standard relief groove according to ISO standard and which exploits the chamfer. In this case, the height of the relief groove can especially correspond to approximately the height of the chamfer.

The relief groove preferably has a radius which corresponds to 1.5-2 times the radius of a comparable blade root which is formed by upset forging. In particular, the radius is 1.5 mm in the case of an upset radius of 0.8, or is 1.75 mm in the case of an upset radius of 1.0.

Furthermore, it is advantageous if the relief groove follows an elliptical curve shape in the direction of the blade axis.

A preferred development of the method according to the invention is characterized in that the relief grooves are milled along an elliptical machining path in the direction of the blade axis.

The machining becomes especially simple if a milling tool which deviates from the spherical shape is used for milling the relief grooves.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is to be subsequently explained in more detail based on exemplary embodiments in connection with the drawing. In the drawing

FIG. 1 shows the type of fastening of the rotor blades which forms the basis of the invention, with a T-shaped blade root between two spacers, as seen in the circumferential direction;

FIG. 2 shows the type of fastening of FIG. 1 in perspective view;

FIG. 3 shows the development of the blade root according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 shows the machining of the relief groove on the blade root with a larger milling tool according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 a shows the machining of the relief groove on the blade root with a smaller milling tool with spherical head;

FIG. 5 shows a blade root according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention in perspective view with an elliptical machining path drawn in; and

FIG. 6 shows the T-shaped blade root which is produced in a conventional manner by upset forging.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

It is particularly advantageous for blades embodying principles of the present invention, that the increased radius which is required for the milled blade root is created by a relief groove which is preferably realized while taking into account the side chamfers which are formed on the spacers. As relief grooves, relief grooves according to ISO standard are first of all a possibility, which are constructed as relief grooves of type E and F according to DIN standard 509. In this case the relief groove of type E cuts only into one of the two adjacent surfaces which are perpendicular to each other, while the relief groove of type F cuts into both surfaces. The two relief groove types have special run-out regions ( 32 , 33 in FIG. 3 ) which serve for the additional stress relief in the radius.

With such relief grooves, without the overall arrangement and type of fastening of the rotor blades being modified, the effect is achieved without any problem of the rotor blades with a forged blade root being able to be replaced by the more cost-effective rotor blades with a milled blade root without losses in the service life having to be suffered. In particular, the adjacent spacers 12 , 18 do not have to be modified or additionally machined. The contact surface between the blade root ( 15 in FIG. 3 ) and the adjacent spacers 12 and 18 is delimited by the chamfers 17 and 19 on the side surfaces of the spacers 12 , 18 , but is also defined so that the type of relief groove 21 within the region of the chamfers 17 , 19 does not have any influence on the contact surface ( FIG. 3 ). Accordingly, the rotor blades are always retained in the same manner between the spacers 12 , 18 , regardless of whether the blade root is forged ( FIG. 6 ) or milled ( FIG. 4 ). From this it also follows that the natural frequencies (resonances) of the blades do not change so that a complete exchangeability between the differently produced blades exists.

A standard relief groove of type F, as already mentioned above, cuts into the two adjacent perpendicular surfaces in the corners of the shoulders 16 , 16 ′ of the blade root 15 ( FIG. 4 a ). This is an advantageous way to achieve the enlarged radius for the desired same or longer service life compared with forged blade roots. Such a standard F relief groove, however, can only be created by a milling process if at the same time the relief groove is to be effected along an elliptical machining path ( 23 in FIG. 5 ) in the direction of the blade axis A 1 . The relief groove, however, is to be milled only with very high cost since the small milling tool 28 , which is shown in FIG. 4 a , with a spherical milling head (head diameter (2×radius R 2 ): 2-3 mm; shank diameter: 1.5-2 mm) has to be used for this.

Therefore, in the case of the blade root 15 , the modified relief groove 21 which is shown in FIGS. 3 , 4 , and 5 is preferably used, which is characterized by an increased height h in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the blade. In particular, the height h of the relief groove 21 corresponds to the entire length of the chamfer 17 , 19 on the side surfaces of the spacers 12 , 18 . The increase of the height h compared with the standard relief groove 30 makes it possible to use a larger milling tool 22 , according to FIG. 4 , with a radius R 1 >R 2 (R 1 is for example 1.75 mm), as a result of which the costs and the machining times are significantly reduced (the broken line hatching in FIG. 4 indicates that the blade root 15 is milled and not forged).

The described increase of the height h of the relief groove is not only allowed (because as a result of the long chamfer 17 , 19 there is no contact anyway between blade root 15 and the spacers 12 , 18 ), but is also desired because the stresses in the notch are automatically reduced as a result.

›LIST OF DESIGNATIONS

While the invention has been described in detail with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes can be made, and equivalents employed, without departing from the scope of the invention. The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto, and their equivalents. The entirety of each of the aforementioned documents is incorporated by reference herein.

›Tables in the description — 1
10Rotor
11Slot
12, 18Spacer
13, 27Rotor blade
14Blade airfoil
15, 25Blade root
16, 16′Shoulder
17, 19Chamfer
20Retaining surface
21, 30Relief groove
22, 28Milling tool
23Elliptical machining path
24Undercut
26, 26′Shoulder
29Forging radius
31Bulge
32, 33Run-out region
A1Blade axis
A2Rotor axis
hHeight (relief groove)
R1, R2Radius (relief groove)
1 of 6 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F01D5/30
USPC · US Patent Classification
416/219.R416/224416/220.R

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.9 y
1,436 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Thinh T Nguyen
art unit 2897 · TC 2800
Citations: 17 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock