USPatent applicationPatented

Shield case and MEMS microphone having it

Granted 8 Mar 2011 · no office action yet

Current assignee: InvenSense · originally Panasonic

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Katsuhiro Makihata, Norio Kimura · Examiner: Melody Mehrpour · AU 2617 · TC 2600

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

To provide a shield case and an MEMS microphone having the shield case which can secure on a top plate the minimum distance for adhering with a gasket in a view point of airtightness. The shield case according to the invention is a shield case for shielding an MEMS chip mounted on a board from the outside, which includes a top plate and a plurality of side plates and the thickness of each of the plurality of side plates is larger than that of the top plate. According to this configuration, the area of the top plate can be made larger as compared with a conventional shield case having a uniform thickness. Thus, the area for adhering the gasket to the top plate can be secured without changing the position, size and range etc. of the chucking area from those of the conventional shield case.

Description

10 parts
›RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the U.S. National Phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/JP2007/067846, filed on Sep. 13, 2007, which in turn claims the benefit of Japanese Application No. 2006-250915, filed on Sep. 15, 2006, the disclosures of which Applications are incorporated by reference herein.

›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a shield case that covers an MEMS chip using the micro-machining technique utilizing the semiconductor technique. Further, the invention relates to an MEMS microphone and, more in detail, relates to an MEMS microphone having a shield case.

›BACKGROUND ART

Conventionally, a shield case has been employed in order to protect electronic parts such as chips mounted on a board from electromagnetic wave noise or dust etc. from the outside.

FIG. 6 shows a perspective outside view of a conventional MEMS microphone. FIG. 7( a ) is a side view of the conventional MEMS microphone. FIG. 7( b ) is a plan view of the conventional MEMS microphone. FIG. 7( c ) is a longitudinal sectional diagram (a sectional diagram along a line A-A in FIG. 6) of the conventional MEMS microphone.

The conventional MEMS microphone 300 shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 is configured by a board 301 , an MEMS chip 200 and a shield case 303 . The MEMS chip 200 is a chip for converting a sound signal into an electric signal.

Such an MEMS microphone 300 is used in a state of being mounted on the main board of a mobile phone etc. In this case, in order to secure a passing path of the sound signal, the sound hole for the microphone of the casing in the mobile phone and a sound hole 303 c on the top plate 303 a of the shield case are disposed and mounted in an overlapped manner. However, even if the sound holes are disposed at an almost overlapping position, when there is a space between the casing and the shield case 303 , the sound signal leaks from the space and so there arises a case that the acoustic characteristics designed in advance changes.

Thus, an improvement has been made that a gasket made of material such as rubber of silicon is adhered and sandwiched between the top plate 303 a of the shield case and the casing of the mobile phone thereby to eliminate the space.

Further, similarly in a view point of the airtightness, a patent document 1 describes an example in which a gasket is pasted between a transparent panel plate and an external cover in the mechanism of the display portion of a mobile phone (see the patent document 1, for example).

Patent Document 1: JP-A-2005354377

›DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

Problems that the Invention is to Solve

In the case of employing the aforesaid method of filling the space by the gasket, in order to secure the airtightness, it is at least required to secure an area for adhering the gasket to the top plate 303 a on the top plate 303 a of the shield case. In other words, as shown in FIG. 7( b ), minimum distances are at least required as distances L 1 , L 2 between the sound hole 303 c of the shield case and the end portions of the top plate 303 a.

On the other hand, in the case of mounting the MEMS microphone 300 on the main board of a mobile phone etc., it is required to secure on the top plate 303 a a chucking area S for picking up and placing the MEMS microphone 300 . As shown in FIG. 7( b ), the chucking area S is required to avoid the sound hole 303 c on the top plate 303 a of the shield case and have a constant area in order to prevent the failure of the MEMS chip 200 . Further, in order to transport the MEMS microphone 300 stably, it is desirable to dispose the chucking area S near the center of gravity of the shield case as close as possible, that is, near the center of the top plate 303 a.

In addition to the aforesaid circumstances, in recent years, the MEMS microphone 300 has been required to be further reduced in its size and thickness, and accordingly the shield case 303 has been reduced in its size and thickness. Accordingly, the area of the top plate 303 a of the shield case has also been reduced, and hence it becomes difficult to secure the area for adhering the gasket while securing the area and location etc. for the chucking area S on the top plate.

To be concrete, the board 301 of the MEMS microphone is planed to have a size of 3 mm in the longitudinal direction and 4 mm in the transverse direction. When this size is employed, as the chucking area S, an area of at least 1.2 mm or more in each of the longitudinal and transverse directions is required to be secured in view of the weight of the shield case and the performance of a chucking device. Further, as shown in FIG. 7( b ), the chucking area S is required to be disposed near the center of the top plate 303 a of the shield case as close as possible.

Further, in order to secure the airtightness due to the sandwiching of the gasket, each of the distances L 1 , L 2 from the sound hole 303 c of the shield case to the end portions of the top plate 303 a is required to be at least 1 mm or more. This distance is desirably as long as possible in a view point of the airtightness.

In this manner, when the area of the top plate is reduced in the case of miniaturizing the conventional shield case, it has become difficult to secure the distances from the sound hole 206 of the shield case to the end portions of the top plate 303 a while securing the area and location for the chucking area S.

Further, in addition to the progress of the miniaturization, the uniform thinning of the shield case 303 has also been progressed within a range where the intensity of the shield case can be secured as a structure. As an example of the current thinnest shield case, there is one in which the thickness of each of the plate 303 and a side plate 303 b is 0.1 mm. The shield case thus thinned is light-weighted and can secure a large size in each of the height, width etc. of an inner frame. However, since the end portions of the side plate are made small, the shield case is configured in a shape soldered hardly. Thus, when the end portions are merely fixed by the solder, the adhesive strength between the end portions and the board is weak.

Thus, as shown in FIG. 7( c ), in the conventional uniformly thinned shield case, a bent portion 303 d is provided at the end portions of the side plates 303 b thereby to provide a space where a suitable amount of the solder is collected. A solder filet 303 e is formed at a space formed by the bent portion 303 d thereby to obtain the fixing intensity of the shield case.

However, the shield case 303 thinned uniformly in the aforesaid manner is required to have a size housed within the board 301 together with the bent portion 303 d , and hence the size of the top plate 303 a is made small by a size of the bent portion 303 d.

Further, since the conventional shield case is usually formed by the squeezing processing and so a bent portion 303 f formed by the end portion of the plate 303 and the side plate 303 b is configured to have an R-shaped portion (round corner). Thus, the conventional shield case does not have a shape that can secure the area of the flat portion of the top plate to the maximum.

The invention has been made in view of the aforesaid problems and an object of the invention is to provide a shield case and an MEMS microphone having the shield case which can secure on a top plate the minimum distance for adhering with a gasket in a view point of airtightness without changing the position, size, range etc. of a chucking area on the top plate of a shield case, that is, while securing the area and position of the chucking area.

Means for Solving the Problems

The shield case according to the invention is a shield case for shielding an MEMS chip mounted on a board from outside, which includes a top plate and a plurality of side plates, wherein the thickness of each of the plurality of side plates is larger than the thickness of the top plate.

According to this configuration, the area of the top plate can be enlarged as compared with the conventional shield case having a uniform thickness. Thus, the area for adhering the gasket to the top plate can be secured without changing the position, size and range etc. of a chucking area from the conventional shield case.

Further, the shield case according to the invention is arranged in a manner that a bent portion formed by the end portion of the top plate and the side plate is formed to have a corner.

According to this configuration, the area of the flat portion of the top plate can be enlarged. The shield case according to the invention can be formed to have a corner portion by the hammering processing performed within a pressing mold, for example. The bent portion formed by the end portion of the top plate and the side plate can be formed to have an R of 0.05 or less, whereby the area of the flat portion of the top plate can be enlarged sufficiently and so the adhering property with the gasket can also be improved.

›DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

Further, the shield case according to the invention is arranged in a manner that each of end portions of the plurality of side plates has an R shaped portion toward the inside of the shield case.

According to this configuration, in the case of mounting the shield case by the reflow soldering processing, since solder enters into the space of the R-shaped portion to form a solder filet, the shield case can be firmly fixed to the board etc. with a suitable amount of the solder. The R-shaped portion desirably has an R of 0.1 or less, and so the space formed by the R-shaped portion can hold a sufficient amount of the solder.

The MEMS microphone according to the invention is arranged to include a board; an MEMS chip mounted on the board; and a shield case, for shielding the MEMS chip from outside, which includes a top plate and a plurality of side plates, wherein the thickness of each of the plurality of side plates is larger than the thickness of the top plate.

According to this configuration, the area of the top plate of the shield case can be enlarged as compared with the conventional shield case having a uniform thickness. Thus, the distance for adhering the gasket to the top plate can be secured to be long without changing the position, size and range etc. of the chucking area from the conventional shield case.

Further, the MEMS microphone according to the invention is arranged in a manner that a bent portion formed by the end portion of the top plate and the side plate of the shield case is formed to have a corner.

According to this configuration, the area of the flat portion of the top plate of the shield case covering the MEMS chip can be enlarged.

Further, the MEMS microphone according to the invention is arranged in a manner that each of the end portions of the plurality of side plates has an R shaped portion toward inside of the shield case.

According to this configuration, in the case of mounting the shield case by the reflow soldering processing etc., since solder enters into the space of the R-shaped portion to form a solder filet, the shield case can be firmly fixed to the board with a suitable amount of the solder.

Effects of the Invention

According to the invention, since the area of the top plate can be enlarged, the area for adhering the gasket to the top plate can be secured without changing the position, size and range etc. of the chucking area from the conventional shield case.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective outside view of an MEMS microphone 100 according to the first embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a longitudinal sectional view (a sectional diagram along a line B-B of FIG. 1 ) of the MEMS microphone 100 .

FIG. 3( a ) is a side view of the MEMS microphone 100 , ( b ) is a plan view of the MEMS microphone 100 , ( c ) is a sectional view along a line C-C in FIGS. 3( b ), and ( d ) is a sectional view along a line D-D in FIG. 3( b ).

FIG. 4 is a perspective outside view of a mobile phone 150 in which the MEMS microphone 100 is mounted.

FIG. 5 is a sectional view of a main portion (sectional view along a line E-E in FIG. 4 ) near the microphone portion of the mobile phone 150 .

FIG. 6 is a perspective outside view of a conventional MEMS microphone.

FIG. 7( a ) is a side view of the conventional MEMS microphone, ( b ) is a plan view of the conventional MEMS microphone, and ( c ) is a longitudinal sectional diagram (a sectional diagram along a line A-A in FIG. 6) of the conventional MEMS microphone.

›EXPLANATION OF SIGNS

100 MEMS microphone

101 board

102 MEMS chip

103 shield case

103 a top plate

103 b side plate

103 c sound hole

103 d R-shaped portion

103 e solder filet

103 f bent portion

150 mobile phone

151 casing

152 sound hole on casing

154 gasket

155 main board of mobile phone

›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

First Embodiment

FIG. 1 shows a perspective outside view of an MEMS microphone 100 according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 shows a longitudinal sectional view (a sectional diagram along a line B-B of FIG. 1 ) of the MEMS microphone 100 . As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 , the MEMS microphone 100 includes a board 101 , an MEMS chip 102 and a shield case 103 and is characterized in that the thickness of each of a plurality of side plates 103 b constituting the shield case 103 is larger than that of a top plate 103 a.

The board 101 is a printed board for mounting the MEMS chip 102 thereon. The size of the mounting surface of the board 101 is 3 mm in the longitudinal direction and 4 mm in the transverse direction, for example.

As shown in FIG. 2 , the MEMS chip 102 converts a sound signal obtained from a vibration film electrode 43 into an electric signal. To be concrete, the MEMS chip 102 includes the vibration film electrode 43 and an electret film 44 via a first insulation layer 42 on the silicon board 41 and further includes a fixed electrode 46 provided with a sound hole 47 via a second insulation layer 45 on the first insulation layer. Further, a back air chamber 55 is formed on the rear surface of the vibration film electrode 43 by etching the silicon board 41 . MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical System) means an electromechanical system configured by fine parts which are fabricated by using the micro fabrication technique for a semiconductor.

The vibration film electrode 43 is formed by conductive polysilicon. The electret film 44 is formed by a silicon nitride film or a silicon oxide film. By laminating conductive polysilicon and a silicon oxide film or a silicon nitride film, the fixed electrode 46 is formed.

An amplifying circuit 48 for amplifying the electric signal from the MEMS chip 102 is electrically coupled by a wire. The MEMS chip 102 and the amplifying circuit 48 are covered by the shield case 103 .

Next, the explanation will be made as to the shield case 103 . FIG. 3( a ) is a side view of the MEMS microphone 100 . FIG. 3( b ) is a plan view of the MEMS microphone 100 . FIG. 3( c ) is a sectional view along a line C-C in FIG. 3( b ). FIG. 3( d ) is a sectional view along a line D-D in FIG. 3( b ). In each diagram of FIG. 3 , the MEMS chip 102 is not shown.

As shown in each diagram, the shield case 103 is configured by a top plate 103 a of an almost rectangular shape having four round corners and four side plates 103 b . The material of the shield case is metal having the electric shield property such as nickel silver (alloy formed by copper, lead and nickel), kovar or 42 alloy. The shield case may be subjected to the surface processing such as Ni plating in order to join with a board by the soldering etc. The thickness of the top plate 103 a is 0.1 mm and the thickness of each of the side plates 103 b is 0.25 mm. The shield case 103 has a different thickened structure in which the side plate 103 b has a larger thickness than the top plate 103 a . Further, the end portion 103 f of the top plate 103 a is formed to have a corner portion. The shield case 103 can be configured in a shape having corner portions by the hammering processing performed within a pressing mold, for example. The corner of the end portion 103 f of the top plate 103 a according to the invention is formed to have an R of 0.05 or less. On the other hand, the corner of the end portion according to the conventional squeezing processing is formed to have an R of 0.2 or less. The shape of the corner may have the R smaller (radius of a circle is smaller) than that of the shape of the corner of the bent portion formed by the conventional squeezing processing.

According to this configuration, since the bent portion formed by the end portion of the top plate and the side plate is not formed to have a relatively large R like the conventional shield case but formed to have a corner, that is, a small R, the flat portion of the top plate is enlarged by an amount corresponding to the thickness of the side plate. Further, the area of the top plate is enlarged by an amount corresponding to the enlarged thickness of the side plate. Thus, in the design of the top plate of the shield case, the area to be adhered to the gasket can be secured and also the chucking area can be secured.

That is, for example, the top plate 103 a of the shield case according to the first embodiment includes the sound hole 103 c having a diameter of 0.6 mm. In the top plate 103 a of the shield case, the chucking area S is secured at the position not overlapping with the sound hole 103 c . The chucking area S is set to have a size of 1.2 mm in each of the longitudinal and transverse directions and is disposed in a manner that the center portion thereof locates near the center portion of the top plate 103 a of the shield case. Since the corner is formed at each of the end portions of the top plate and the side plate is configured in the different thickened structure thereby to enlarge the area of the flat portion of the top plate 303 a , it becomes possible to dispose the sound hole 103 c at the position not overlapping with the chucking area S and further at such a position that the distances L 1 , L 2 from the sound hole 103 c to the end portions of the top plate 103 a are 1 mm or more. Since the shield case is formed in a manner that a single plate is processed so as to have different thicknesses, then the plate is subjected to the forming processing within the pressing mold and subjected to the hammering processing within the pressing mold, the side plate is formed to have a larger thickness than the top plate and have the small R.

Further, the side plates 103 b of the shield case are formed at the end portions of the respective sides of the top plate 103 a of the rectangular shape, respectively. The shield case 103 is formed by the top plate 103 a and the four side plates 103 b and is configured in a lid shape of an almost rectangular shape. The end portion of the side plate 103 b is processed so as to have an R-shaped portion 103 d toward the inside of the shield case 103 .

›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

According to the aforesaid configuration, in the case of mounting the shield case 103 on the board 101 by the reflow soldering processing etc., since the solder enters into the space of the R-shaped portion 103 d to form a solder filet 103 e as shown in FIG. 2 , the shield case can be firmly fixed to the board with a suitable amount of the solder. Conventionally, since the R-shaped portion has an R of about 0.15, the space of the R-shaped portion 103 d can not hold a sufficient amount of the solder. However, since the R-shaped portion of the embodiment has an R of 0.1 or less, the space of the R-shaped portion 103 d can hold a sufficient amount of the solder.

Although the first embodiment is explained as to the case where the shield case is configured in the rectangular lid shape, the shape of the shield case is not limited thereto and may be modified in accordance with the shape of the board. For example, when the board 101 has a circular shape, the top plate of the shield case 103 also may be configured in a circular shape. Further, when the board 101 has a polygonal shape, the top plate of the shield case 103 also may be configured in a polygonal shape.

Second Embodiment

Next, the explanation will be made as to a case where the MEMS microphone 100 is used for a mobile phone. FIG. 4 is a perspective outside view of a mobile phone 150 in which the MEMS microphone 100 is mounted. FIG. 5 is a sectional view of a main portion (sectional view along a line E-E in FIG. 4 ) near the microphone portion of the mobile phone 150 .

In the casing 151 of the mobile phone 150 shown in FIG. 4 , a sound hole 152 for the microphone is formed at a position corresponding to near the mouth of a user in use.

A gasket 154 is sandwiched between the top plate 103 a of the shield case of the MEMS microphone 100 and the inner side surface of the casing 151 . Like the shield case of the first embodiment, this shield case 103 is also characterized in that the thickness of the side plate 103 b is larger than that of the top plate 103 a . As shown in FIG. 5 , the sound hole 152 of the casing 151 has almost the same shape as the sound hole 103 c of the shield case, and these sound holes are formed so as to be overlapped to each other after the assembling.

The gasket 154 is also provided with a hole 154 a having almost the same shape as the sound hole 103 c . An acoustic resistance material 154 b is formed at the end portion on the casing side of the hole 154 a . The acoustic resistance material 154 b serves to reduce the propagation speed of the sound signal and in this case acts to adjust the acoustic characteristics of the MEMS microphone 100 .

The thickness of the gasket 154 is slightly larger than the space between the top plate 103 a and the inner side surface of the casing 151 , and so the gasket is sandwiched in a closely adhered state from the sound hole 103 c to each of the end portions of the top plate 103 a of the shield case.

That is, as the area for sandwiching the gasket 154 , the distances L 1 , L 2 from the sound hole 103 c to the respective end portions of the top plate 103 a of the shield case are designed to be 1 mm or more, the airtightness after sandwiching the gasket 154 can be secured.

Accordingly, since the sound signal entering from the sound hole 152 of the casing does not leak into the space between the top plate 103 a and the inner side surface of the casing 151 , the acoustic characteristics of the MEMS microphone 100 can not be degraded.

Sound entered from the sound hole 152 of the casing passes the acoustic resistance material 154 b and propagated to the vibration film electrode 43 of the MEMS chip. Thus, the electrostatic capacity of a plate capacitor configured by the vibration film electrode 43 and the fixed electrode 46 changes and so the sound is taken out as a voltage change between the vibration film electrode 43 and the fixed electrode 46 .

The MEMS microphone 100 is enlarged in the area of the top plate by employing the different thickened structure at the shield case 103 , whereby the problem of the sound leak at the gasket can be solved. Thus, the miniaturized MEMS microphone 100 can be mounted on a mobile phone, which contributes to the miniaturization and thinning of the entire shape of the mobile phone 150 .

Further, since the shield case 103 has the different thickened structure in which the thickness of the side plate has a larger thickness than the top plate, the position of the center of the gravity is stable as compared with a shield case having a uniform thickened structure. Thus, in the assembling process, when a chucking device chucks the chucking area of the shield case 103 and transports the MEMS microphone 100 , the microphone can be transported stably. In other words, a process of transporting the MEMS microphone 100 to the mounting position of the main board 155 of the mobile phone 150 can be performed surely and stably.

›INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the invention, since the area of the top plate of the shield case can be enlarged, the invention is useful as the shield case and the MEMS microphone having the shield case which can secure the area for adhering the gasket to the top plate without changing the position, size and range etc. of the chucking area from the conventional ones.

Claims as granted

39 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04M1/00
  • H04R9/08
USPC · US Patent Classification
455/575.1381/361

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.5 y
1,272 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Melody Mehrpour
art unit 2617 · TC 2600
Citations: 13 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028Owner 2Owner 3Owner 4
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock