USPatent applicationPatented

Seed singulator

Granted 20 Apr 2010 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A seed singulator for use with a vacuum disk having a seed face and a shoulder. The seed singulator has a first member and a second member supported by biasing members. The first member has upper lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly less than the outside radius of a row of apertures on a seed plane of the vacuum disk. The seed member has lower lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly greater than the inside radius than the row of apradius. The biasing members permit the lobes to move with the seed plane and the shoulder as the vacuum disk rotates thereby maintaining their position with respect to the apertures.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well recognized that proper and uniform spacing of seed in the furrow is essential to maximizing crop yield. The first step in achieving uniform spacing is to accurately dispense one seed and one seed only at the proper timing. This “singulation” accuracy is a performance benchmark that is well known for many types of seed meters, whether mechanical or pneumatic, and is often tested on a seed meter test stand prior to the beginning of the planting season.

There are many different manufacturers of pneumatic seed meters which fall into the more specific categories of air meters and vacuum meters. An example of one type of commercially successful air meter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,888,387 to Deckler. An example of one type of commercially successful vacuum meter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,909 to Lundie et al. Other commercially successful vacuum meters include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,428 to Stufflebeam et al., U.S. Patent Publication No. 20050204972 to Eben et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,990,606 to Gugenhan. Many of these meters have historically operated at performance levels of 93% to 97% accuracy. Recent improvements to vacuum meters have allowed them to operate at a typical accuracy of 98 to 99%. The vacuum meter is capable of 99% singulation on some seed types but has been plagued with the need for adjustment in order to attain that performance. Secondly, the particular design of many of these meters has made them susceptible to reduced performance levels as a result of manufacturing tolerances.

A problem affecting singulation accuracy with vacuum meters that utilize “celled-disks” (i.e., disks with indentations or “cells” around each aperture in the disk, such as the disks disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,909 to Lundie et al.), is that such meters have a higher tendency to plant “skips” and “doubles” in near succession when planting flat shaped seeds. Despite this tendency, however, celled-disk vacuum meters offer the unique advantage of permitting the meter to generally operate at lower vacuum levels than meters that use flat or non-celled disks (i.e., vacuum disks with apertures only) because the indentations or cells assist in holding the seeds in place, thus requiring less vacuum pressure to entrain the seeds.

In an attempt to improve singulation accuracy, farmers have tried to use non-celled disks with meters originally designed for celled-disk meters. For example, with the John Deere MaxEmerge vacuum meters, farmers started using one of the specialty disks designed by John Deere for planting irregular seeds such as sweet corn (thus, this disk is often referred to as the “sweet corn disk”). The sweet corn disk is flat on the planting surface and does not have any indentations or cells to hold the seed. Similar to the sweet corn disk, an update kit, known as the Accu-Vac Update Kit, available from S.I. Distributing, Inc. St. Marys, Ohio, utilizes a flat, non-celled disk. The Accu-Vac disk has larger apertures in order to ensure the seeds are adequately entrained so they do not prematurely slough-off as the disk rotates. While the sweet corn disk and the Accu-Vac disk have markedly increased singulation performance when used in place of celled-disk, both have resulted in a system that requires very tedious adjustments by the planter operator in order to achieve optimum performance. Furthermore, the design of this meter and the nature of disks to warp over time has resulted in difficulty in keeping the double eliminator in proper alignment with the disk.

Other vacuum seed meters such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,990,606 to Gugenhan have relied upon the flat disk with apertures and a seed stripping “singulator.” These designs have provided for more repeatable and operator-friendly adjustments but the need still remains for adjustment. The meter disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,428 to Stufflebeam et al. utilizes a flat disk and three spring loaded singulating spools that compensate for tolerances in one direction, but the spools do not compensate for radial translation of the disk.

Accordingly, there remains a need for a seed singulator that can be used with different types of meters and different types of seed disks, but which can deliver very high singulation accuracy while requiring minimal adjustments for seed type or manufacturing tolerances and wherein the singulation accuracy is not adversely effected by axial and radial translations of the disk.

›SUMMARY

The present invention is directed to a seed singulator for use with a vacuum disk having a seed face and a shoulder. The seed singulator has a first member and a second member supported by biasing members. The first member has upper lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly less than the outside radius of a row of apertures on a seed plane of the vacuum disk. The seed member has lower lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly greater than the inside radius than the row of apradius. The biasing members permit the lobes to move with the seed plane and the shoulder as the vacuum disk rotates thereby maintaining their position with respect to the apertures.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a partially exploded perspective view of the conventional vacuum meter utilizing a flat non-celled disk.

FIG. 2 is a partially exploded perspective view of an offset disk type vacuum seed meter.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a conventional flat disk as viewed along lines 3 - 3 of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an offset disk as viewed along lines 4 - 4 of FIG. 2 .

FIG. 5 is an exploded perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the seed singulator of the present invention shown being mountable to the back cover of a conventional vacuum meter housing.

FIG. 6 is a detailed perspective view showing the singulator assembly of FIG. 5 in use on an offset disk.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a base for the seed singulator of FIG. 5 .

FIG. 8 is a top perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the rail for the seed singulator of FIG. 5 .

FIG. 9 is a bottom perspective view of the rail for the seed singulator of FIG. 5 .

FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the seed singulator of FIG. 5 illustrating the various degrees of freedom that can be achieved by the preferred embodiment.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, FIG. 1 shows an exploded perspective view of a conventional vacuum meter 100 , such as the John Deere MaxEmerge® vacuum meter, which is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,909 to Lundie et al., incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. The John Deere MaxEmerge vacuum meter 10 is generally designed for use with a celled disk, but in FIG. 1 , the celled disk has been replaced with a flat non-celled disk 200 such as the sweet corn disk or Accu-Vac disk previously described. The disk 200 is rotatably mounted within a housing 102 . The housing 102 includes a back cover 104 and a front cover 106 .

FIG. 2 shows a partially exploded view of vacuum meter 400 that is substantially the same as the vacuum meter 100 as illustrated in FIG. 1 except that the flat-disk 200 , is replaced by an offset disk 500 . FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the flat disk 200 as viewed along lines 3 - 3 of FIG. 1 . FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the offset disk 500 as viewed along lines 4 - 4 of FIG. 2 .

As best illustrated in FIG. 3 the seed-side face 204 of the offset disk 200 defines a seed plane 222 . A plurality of apertures 208 are disposed around the seed plane 222 for entraining the seeds onto the face of the seed-side face 204 of the disk as it rotates through the seed pool within the vacuum meter housing 102 . Depending on the type of seed to be planted, the apertures 208 may be equally radially spaced or the apertures 208 may comprise radially spaced groupings, or the apertures 208 may be disposed in multiple rows offset or radially aligned. In the embodiment of FIG. 1 , the apertures are shown equally spaced around a radius R 1 , the outside radius of the apertures is referenced as R 2 , the inside radius of the apertures is referenced as R 3 . The disk 200 further includes a shoulder 230 disposed at a radius R 4 from the centerline of the disk. The shoulder 230 may be the outer circumferential periphery of the disk 200 as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or the should 230 may be radially inward from the circumferential outer periphery of the disk, similar to the offset disk 500 but with a flat face and a less pronounced offset.

As best illustrated in FIG. 4 the seed-side face 504 of the offset disk 500 preferably comprises two primary planes offset from each other, the base plane 520 , and the seed plane 522 . The seed plane 522 is a raised planar surface extending from the base plane 520 by inner conical side wall 526 and an outer cylindrical sidewall 528 defining a cylindrical shoulder 530 . As with the flat disk 200 , the offset disk 500 includes a plurality of apertures 508 for entraining the seeds onto the face of the disk as it rotates through the seed pool within the vacuum meter housing. Depending on the type of seed to be planted, the apertures 508 may be equally radially spaced or the apertures 508 may comprise radially spaced groupings, or the apertures 508 may be disposed in multiple rows offset or radially aligned. In the embodiment of FIG. 2 , the apertures are shown equally spaced around a radius R 1 , the outside radius of the apertures is referenced as R 2 , the inside radius of the apertures is referenced as R 3 and the radius of the cylindrical shoulder 530 is referenced as R 4 .

A preferred embodiment of a seed singulator assembly 900 is shown in FIG. 5 as being mountable to a back cover 104 of a conventional vacuum meter housing 102 . FIG. 6 illustrates the seed singulator assembly 900 disposed on an offset disk 500 . The singulator assembly 900 includes a singulator base 902 which is preferably mountable in a conventional manner to the back cover 104 of the vacuum meter housing 102 through two mounting ears 904 . The base 902 provides a secure platform from which the other components comprising the singulator assembly 900 are supported.

It is known that singulation performance improves with an increasing number of times that the seeds are contacted by the singulating lobes. It has been determined that superior singulation accuracy is achieved by bumping or agitating the seeds from both the top side (i.e., the outside radius R of the apertures) and the bottom side (i.e., the inside radius R 3 of the apertures). For example, if a singulator is used that only bumps the seeds from the top side, then some seeds multiples may be able to “hang” on the very bottom of the aperture and would not be stripped or removed by the top singulator. Furthermore, it has been found that singulation can be best achieved when the seed is contacted three times from the top side of the apertures 208 , 508 relative to the path of travel and two times from the bottom side of the apertures 208 , 508 .

Accordingly, in the preferred embodiment, a rail 906 supports three lobes 908 , 910 , 912 . As illustrated in FIG. 6 , these three lobes 908 , 910 , 912 are disposed on the top side of the apertures 508 . The rail 906 has an inner face 913 having a radius of curvature that is preferably substantially the same or slightly larger than the radius R 4 of the shoulder 230 , 530 . Continuing to refer to FIG. 6 , two bottom lobes 914 , 916 are preferably supported by two divergent arms 918 , 920 preferably extending from an L-shaped bracket 922 connected to the rail 906 . The bottom lobes 914 , 916 are also preferably made of a wear resistant and durable material such as metal or brass using the investment casting or metal injection molding process. Each of the lobes 908 , 910 , 912 , 914 , 916 has a surface 924 that is co-planar with the other lobes. As shown in FIG. 6 each of these co-planar surfaces 924 is disposed adjacent the seed plane 522 of the offset disk 500 . For the flat disk 200 , each of these co-planar surfaces 924 would be disposed adjacent the seed plane 222 of the flat disk 200 .

Referring to FIG. 7 , in the preferred embodiment, a first wire 926 is supported at each end by tabs or slots in the base 902 . As illustrated in FIG. 7 , this first wire 926 is preferably received within hooks 930 disposed on the L-shaped bracket 922 . This first wire 926 serves as an axial spring which biases the co-planar surfaces 924 of the lobes 908 , 910 , 912 , 914 , 916 against or in contact with the seed plane 222 , 522 of the disk 200 , 500 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

Continuing to refer to FIG. 7 , a second wire 932 is secured at or near its ends to the base 902 . Disposed on the back side of the rail 906 is a tongue 934 which is receivable by and is slidable within a groove 936 formed in the top wall 938 of the base 902 . The tongue 934 within the groove 936 also receives the second wire 932 as best illustrated in FIG. 9 . Thus, the second wire 932 serves as a radial spring which biases the inner face 913 of the rail 906 against the top or outside diameter of the shoulder 230 , 530 .

It should be appreciated that the preferred embodiment permits the lobes 908 , 910 , 912 , 914 , 916 to “float” with the seed plane 222 , 522 and the shoulder 230 , 530 of the disk 200 , 500 . This ability to float provides inherent advantages. For example, during rotation, the disk 200 , 500 may translate about the central axis due to warping, or as a result of the bearing or hub being out of alignment, or possibly due to bending or flexing of the disk 200 , 500 caused by the pressure differential between the seed-side face and the vacuum side face of the disk. Additionally, the disk 200 , 500 may be subject to radial translation caused by improper hub alignment, mounting tolerances or disk eccentricities associated with the manufacturing process or manufacturing tolerances. FIG. 10 illustrates the various degrees of freedom that is provided by the foregoing spring biased suspension system of the seed singulator assembly 900 .

Thus, by providing a singulator with lobes that float and remain in contact with the seed plane 222 , 522 and/or in contact with the top of the shoulder 230 , 530 , the singulator assembly 900 is able to compensate for both radial translation and axial translation and radial rotation of the disk, while the amount of coverage of the apertures 108 , 208 , 508 by the passing lobes 908 , 910 , 912 , 914 , 916 remains constant regardless of the movement of the disk 200 , 500 . Additionally, the spring biased suspension of the lobes permits the lobes to flex away from the apertures 208 , 508 in the case a seed or fragment becomes stuck in the aperture. This flexure prevents adverse wear to the surfaces 924 and edges of the lobes and also improves performance by preventing sudden jerking of the disk due to seeds wedging between an inflexible or immovable singulator and the aperture.

A further advantage of the preferred embodiment of the spring suspension system of the singulator 900 is that the singulator assembly 900 need not be removed when switching from the offset disk 500 to a celled (with which a singulator is not generally used). Instead, in the preferred embodiment, the rail 906 is capable of being locked into a depressed position whereby the lobes 908 , 910 , 912 , 914 , 916 will not contact the seed-side face 104 of the disk 100 . Referring to FIGS. 7 , 8 and 9 , a groove 940 is formed in the top side edge of the rail 906 . A tab 942 also projects from the top side edge of the rail 906 . By depressing the rail 906 downwardly and rearwardly relative to the base 902 , the tab 942 can be forced behind the second wire 932 such that the second wire 932 locks the rail in place in the downward or depressed position with the second wire 932 disposed on the top edge of the rail 906 and resting groove 940 .

The foregoing description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment of the singulator assembly, such as the various alternative embodiments disclosed in co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/710,014 incorporated herein in its entirety, and the general principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Thus, the present invention is not to be limited to the embodiments of the apparatus and methods described above and illustrated in the drawing figures, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims as granted

7 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01C9/00
  • A01C7/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
111/185

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRestriction requirement
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.7 y
1,342 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
after a restriction
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Christopher J. Novosad
art unit 3641 · TC 3600
Citations: 8 back · 58 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock