Controllable delay line and regulation compensation circuit thereof
Granted 21 Jul 2009 · 1 office action
Assignee: Faraday Technology
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Chia-Wei Chang, Yeong-Jar Chang · Examiner: An T Luu · AU 2816 · TC 2800
Life of the application
8 dated eventsAbstract
A controllable delay line includes an anti-jitter unit, a dependent current source, a first current mirror, a second current mirror, a regulation capacitor, a compensation capacitor and an output buffer unit. The anti-jitter unit receives a first bias voltage and produces a second bias voltage based on the first bias voltage. When the voltage source used in the controllable delay line has a variation, the second bias voltage varies therewith. The regulation capacitor is used for reducing the variation of the voltage difference between the voltage source and a node voltage of the first current source. The compensation capacitor is used for reducing the influence of a transition of the input signal of the output buffer unit on the node voltage, so as to lower the jitter amount of the output signal of the output buffer unit.
Description
6 parts›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims the priority benefit of Taiwan application serial no. 96104474, filed Feb. 7, 2007. All disclosure of the Taiwan application is incorporated herein by reference.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a controllable delay line.
2. Description of Related Art
Delay lines can be used in many applications, such as in phase-locked loops, delay-locked loops or time interval measuring. In addition, delay lines can be used in jitter measuring of PLL or DLL as well.
Controllable delay lines in the conventional design, however, are vulnerable by power voltage variation and have higher design cost, limited operation speed and limited maximum delay.
Based on the above-mentioned situation, such a controllable delay line is preferred that any influence caused by power voltage variation would be reduced and the operation speed and the maximum delay thereof would be increased.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to provide a controllable delay line able to reduce the influence of a power voltage variation on the bias voltage source thereof.
The present invention is further directed to provide a controllable delay line able to reduce the influence of a power voltage variation on the jitter of an output signal.
The present invention is further yet directed to provide a controllable delay line able to increase the operation speed and the maximum delay thereof.
As embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides. The present invention provides a controllable delay line, which includes an anti-jitter unit, a first current mirror, a first current mirror, a second current mirror, an output buffer unit and a compensation capacitor. The anti-jitter unit receives a first bias voltage source and produces a second bias voltage source. When a power voltage variation occurs, the anti-jitter unit makes the second bias voltage source varied therewith. The output buffer unit is coupled to the first current mirror and the second current mirror, and has a plurality of input stage buffers. The compensation capacitor is coupled between the first current mirror and an input stage buffer of the output buffer unit.
The present invention further provides a regulation compensation circuit suitable for a controllable delay line, wherein the controllable delay line includes a first current source and an output buffer unit, while the regulation compensation circuit includes a regulation capacitor and a compensation capacitor. The regulation capacitor is for reducing a variation of the voltage between a voltage source and a node of the first current source. The compensation capacitor is coupled between the node of the first current source and the output buffer unit. When an input signal of the output buffer unit gets a transition, the compensation capacitor can reduce the influence of the transition on the voltage of the node so as to reduce the jitter amount of the output signal of the output buffer unit.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a controllable delay line according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the design principle of an anti-jitter unit and the equivalent circuit thereof.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating how the maximum delay and the maximum operable frequency are increased in the present embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the effect of a compensation capacitor C DC and a regulation capacitor C DP .
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the simulation result of the present embodiment.
›DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2
In order to better understand the present invention, an embodiment thereof is exemplarily described in detail as the following.
In the present invention, an anti-jitter unit is employed to increase the circuit reliability and reduce the jitter amount. In addition, a compensation capacitor is employed to reduce the jitter amount of the output signal and a regulation capacitor is employed to reduce the voltage variation inside the circuit.
FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a controllable delay line according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown by FIG. 1 , the controllable delay line of the present embodiment includes an anti-jitter unit 11 , a dependent current source 12 , current mirrors 13 and 14 , a regulation capacitor C DP , a compensation capacitor C DC and an output buffer unit 15 .
The anti-jitter unit 11 includes a transmission gate T DJ and a capacitor C DJ . When a voltage source VDD has a variation (for example, ±10% variation), the anti-jitter unit 11 enables a bias voltage source Vrp 1 to be varied therewith so as to increase the circuit reliability and reduce the jitter amount. Another bias voltage source Vrp can be produced by a bandgap reference circuit or a digital-to-analog converter (DAC). The more operation details and the circuit principle of the anti-jitter unit 11 would be explained later referring to FIG. 2 . Besides, the capacitor C DJ can be a metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor (MOS capacitor).
The transmission gate T DJ determines the on/off states of the PMOS transistor (not shown) and the NMOS transistor (not shown) therein according to a clock signal CLK. The value of the bias voltage source Vrp 1 is related to the voltage source VDD and the bias voltage source Vrp.
The dependent current source 12 includes transistors M 11 -M 19 , wherein the wirings of the transistors M 11 -M 19 are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein. In addition, a plurality of control signals D 1 -D 4 are respectively input to the gates of the transistors M 12 , M 14 , M 16 and M 18 . The control signals D 1 -D 4 are for controlling the delay of the delay line.
The current mirror 13 includes transistors M 21 and M 22 , wherein the wirings of the transistors M 21 and M 22 are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein. A source/drain of the transistor M 22 is coupled to the second stage of the output buffer unit 15 , not to the input stage of the output buffer unit 15 .
The current mirror 14 includes transistors M 31 and M 32 , wherein the wirings of the transistors M 31 and M 32 are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein.
The regulation capacitor C DP is for reducing voltage variation between the voltage source VDD and a node voltage Vrp 2 at node E of the first current source, wherein the wirings of the regulation compensation circuit C DP are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein.
The compensation capacitor C DC is for reducing the influence of the input signal In on the node voltage Vrp 2 of the node E so as to reduce the jitter amount of the output signal Out, wherein the wirings of the compensation capacitor C DC are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein. The capacitor C DJ can be a MOS capacitor.
The output buffer unit 15 includes transistors M 41 -M 48 , wherein the paired transistors form an inverter. That is to say, the output buffer unit 15 includes a plurality of inverters in series connection. The wirings of the transistors M 41 -M 48 are shown in FIG. 1 and omitted to describe herein.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the design principle of the anti-jitter unit and the equivalent circuit thereof. Referring to FIG. 2 , since the leakage current and the gate-source voltage drop Vgs are to be fixed, the PMOS transistor and the NMOS transistor inside the transmission gate would be simultaneously turned on whenever the controllable delay line of the embodiment is started up, so that a correct Vrp value can be introduced. Once the controllable delay line runs normally, the NMOS transistor is off, but the PMOS transistor remains to be on. When the NMOS transistor is off, the equivalent model thereof can be referred as a large resistance Req; furthermore, the size of the PMOS transistor can be appropriately adjusted to make the ON equivalent resistance thereof not too small. Thanks to the large equivalent resistance Req, the bias voltage source Vrp can be coupled to the bias voltage source Vrp 1 through the leakage current, so that distortion of the voltage Vrp 1 caused by the leakage current at the gate terminals of the transistors M 11 , M 13 , M 15 , M 17 and M 19 can be solved.
In order to solve the problem that the level of the voltage Vrp 1 is affected by the leakage current between the transmission gate T DJ and the capacitor C DJ , the component dimensions of the transmission gate T DJ and the capacitor C DJ will be accordingly adjusted in design.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating how the present embodiment increases the maximum delay and the maximum operable frequency. A conventional controllable delay line usually includes a pair of PMOS transistor MP 3 and NMOS transistor MN 3 (indicated by dashed line circles in FIG. 3 ). By controlling the gate voltages of the NMOS transistor MM 3 and the PMOS transistor MP 3 , from the output signal Out, rising edges and falling edges of the input signal In is observed. It is clear that falling edges of the output signal are fixed due to the presence of the NMOS transistor MN 3 , which would limit the maximum delay and the maximum operable frequency of the circuit.
In the controllable delay line of the present embodiment, if only the rising edge variation is to be considered, the NMOS transistor MM 3 is removed to reduce the circuit area. On the other hand, the falling edge of the output signal can be shifted back if the transistor M 41 has a small size. In this way, the maximum delay and the maximum operable frequency of the circuit are increased. For example, the maximum operable frequency is increased from 2.5 GHz to 2.778 GHz, which is equivalent to an 11.1% increase.
›DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2
In addition, the PMOS transistor MP 3 is coupled to the first stage of the output buffer unit in the prior art; but in the present embodiment, the PMOS transistor M 22 with the similar function is coupled to the second stage of the output buffer unit, which can further enhance the adjustment effect.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the effect of the compensation capacitor C DC and the regulation capacitor C DP . Assuming the circuit had no the compensation capacitor C DC , when the input signal In (at the node B) transits from a logic-low state to a logic-high state, the level at the node C would transit from a logic-high state to a logic-low state, which makes the gate voltage (at the node E) of the transistor M 22 unstable accompanying an increasing jitter amount.
In the embodiment however, the compensation capacitor C DC is added between the node B and the node E, so as to reduce the influence of the input signal In on the voltage of the node E and to reduce the jitter amount of the output signal Out.
In consideration of an influence of process variation, if the voltage source VDD has, for example, ±10% variation (assuming VDD=1.0V), the jitter amount of the output signal Out will be affected by the voltage variation. The minimum delay of the output signal Out will be occurred corresponding to VDD=1.1V, which is denoted by T (VDD 1.1V ); The maximum delay of the output signal Out will be occurred corresponding to VDD=0.9V, which is denoted by T (VDD 0.9V ). Thus, the jitter amount J_OUT of the output signal can be defined as
J _OUT= T (VDD 0.9V )− T (VDD 1.1V ).
In the embodiment, the compensation capacitor C DC is disposed between the voltage Vrp 2 (the voltage at the node E) and the input signal to reduce the influence of the variation of the voltage source VDD on the output signal.
In general speaking, the coupling charge in the input signal In, coupled to the node voltage Vrp 2 via the compensation capacitor C DC , is related to the level of the voltage source. The higher the level of the voltage source, the greater the coupling charge is and vice versa.
In this way, the jitter of the output signal can be reduced by the compensation function of the compensation capacitor C DC . The following table gives out simulation results.
In the table, ‘C DC ’ represents the jitter amounts when the compensation capacitor C DC is added only; ‘C DJ & T DJ ’ represents the jitter amounts when the anti-jitter unit is added only. It can be seen from the table that on the whole the jitter amounts are reduced with an average improvement rate of 40%.
Since the signal at the node D and the input signal In are in the same phase, thus, in another embodiment of the present invention, the compensation capacitor C DC can be coupled between the node E and the node D as well. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating voltage variation at the node E respectively in the prior art and in the present embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the simulation result of the present embodiment where the simulation of the node voltage Vrp 1 is conducted based on ±99.2 mV variation of the voltage source VDD (VDD=1V, assuming ±10% relative variation).
It can be seen from FIG. 5 that in the prior art, Vrp 1 is nearly unchanged even if the variation of VDD (the variation of Vrp 1 is ±4.29 mV), which means the voltage difference between VDD and Vrp 1 is not fixed under the same control signals so that the jitter of the output signal is increased.
When the capacitor C DJ or the transmission gate T DJ are disposed, Vrp 1 would be slightly varied with VDD, wherein the variations of Vrp 1 are respectively ±4.6 mV (C DJ ) and ±78.3 mV (T DJ ).
In the present embodiment, the value of Vrp 1 is varied with VDD by ±99.1 mV. That is to say the voltage difference between VDD and Vrp 1 in the embodiment is fixed, which enables the jitter of the output signal reduced.
In summary, by using an anti-jitter unit, the bias voltage Vrp 1 would be varied even if variation of the voltage source, which can increase the circuit reliability and reduce the jitter amount of the output signal. In addition, by coupling the transistor M 22 to the second stage of the output buffer unit and using a small size transistor M 41 , the maximum delay and the maximum operable frequency are increased. Further, by adding a compensation capacitor, the jitter amount of the output signal can be further reduced. Furthermore, by adding a regulation capacitor, the voltage difference variation between the voltage source and the voltage at the node E can be lowered.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
›Tables in the description — 1
| In Prior | Improvement | Improvement | In The | Improvement | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1-D4 | Art | C DC | Rate | C DJ & T DJ | Rate | Embodiment | Rate |
| [1111] | 0.135 | 0.040 | 70.37% | 0.179 | −32.59% | 0.023 | 82.96% |
| [1110] | 0.555 | 0.383 | 30.99% | 0.620 | −11.71% | 0.190 | 65.77% |
| [1101] | 0.673 | 0.521 | 22.59% | 0.636 | 5.50% | 0.562 | 16.49% |
| [1100] | 0.782 | 0.753 | 3.71% | 0.538 | 31.20% | 0.503 | 35.68% |
| [1011] | 0.804 | 0.657 | 18.28% | 0.781 | 2.86% | 0.354 | 55.97% |
| [1010] | 0.747 | 0.525 | 29.72% | 0.595 | 20.35% | 0.438 | 41.37% |
| [1001] | 0.728 | 0.542 | 25.55% | 0.474 | 34.89% | 0.271 | 62.77% |
| [1000] | 0.533 | 0.423 | 20.64% | 0.384 | 27.95% | 0.362 | 32.08% |
| [0111] | 0.417 | 0.315 | 24.46% | 0.337 | 19.18% | 0.309 | 25.90% |
| [0110] | 0.389 | 0.336 | 13.62% | 0.126 | 67.61% | 0.363 | 6.68% |
| [0101] | 0.344 | 0.339 | 1.45% | 0.025 | 92.73% | 0.245 | 28.78% |
| [0100] | 0.340 | 0.317 | 6.76% | 0.021 | 93.82% | 0.237 | 30.29% |
| [0011] | 0.335 | 0.254 | 24.18% | 0.018 | 94.63% | 0.233 | 30.45% |
| [0010] | 0.326 | 0.235 | 27.91% | 0.292 | 10.43% | 0.228 | 30.06% |
| [0001] | 0.332 | 0.256 | 22.89% | 0.012 | 96.39% | 0.223 | 32.83% |
| [0000] | 0.280 | 0.278 | 0.71% | 0.313 | −11.79% | 0.219 | 21.79% |
Claims as granted
8 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
5 codes- H03H11/26
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock