USPatent applicationPatented

Wireless communication apparatus which communicates at specified frame cycles

Granted 12 May 2009 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Cisco Systems · originally Navini Networks, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Hang Jin, Li Guo · Examiner: William D Cumming · AU 2617 · TC 2600

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method is provided for selecting multiple customer premises equipments (CPEs) to share a channel in a wireless communications network. The method includes calculating a correlation between spatial signatures of every two CPEs subscribing to a base transceiver station (BTS) of the wireless communications network, wherein two CPEs constitute channel-sharing candidates if their correlation is lower than a predetermined threshold, creating a first set of CPEs of all the member of channel-sharing candidates, counting a number of channel-sharing candidates a CPE relates to for every CPE, selecting a first CPE related to the fewest number of channel-sharing candidates, creating a second set of CPEs by identifying all the CPEs that the first CPE relates to, and selecting a second CPE related to the fewest number of channel-sharing candidates from the second set of CPEs, wherein the first and second CPEs become two selected CPEs to share the channel.

Description

6 parts
›CROSS REFERENCE

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. 60/836,719, which was filed on Aug. 10, 2006.

›BACKGROUND

Spatial division multiple access (SDMA) increases the capacity of a wireless communications network by allowing more than one wireless station to access a communication channel on the same frequency at the same time. One example of channel sharing is that wireless stations, such as customer premises equipments (CPEs), transmit signals on the same frequency at different times or on different frequencies at the same time.

How to select a set of CPEs to share a communication channel is a very complicated and computationally intensive process. This is true primarily because not every CPE can share a communication channel with other CPEs in a wireless communications network employing SDMA.

There are a number of reasons why some CPEs cannot share a communication channel. One of the reasons is co-channel interference (CCI), which occurs when a CPE receives unintended signals from other CPEs sharing the same communication channel. This type of inter-user interference is the major drawback of an SDMA system. To suppress inter-user interference, an SDMA system must provide a means to isolate the spatial signatures of one CPE from those of the rest of the CPEs sharing a channel. Otherwise, inter-user interference may cause a communication channel to be unusable for the entire set of CPEs.

A second reason is that different CPEs may subscribe to the services of a base transceiver station (BTS) at any given time. In other words, a set of CPEs sharing a communication channel at one point in time may not be the same set of CPEs sharing the same communication channel at another time. A third reason is that the characteristics of the radio link may change over time.

In a conventional method, a BTS selects an optimal set of CPEs to permanently share a communication channel in a wireless communications network employing SDMA, based on certain predetermined parameters. The optimal set of CPEs chosen to share a communication channel at one time might not be optimal at a later time. Therefore, the permanent grouping of CPEs to share a communication channel is ineffective and inefficient.

What is desired is a system and method for improving the grouping of CPEs dynamically in a wireless communications network employing SDMA that addresses the dynamic nature of the radio link and participants of communication sessions.

›SUMMARY

A method is provided for selecting multiple customer premises equipments (CPEs) to share a channel in a wireless communications network. The method comprises calculating a correlation between spatial signatures of every two CPEs subscribing to a base transceiver station (BTS) of the wireless communications network, wherein two CPEs constitute channel-sharing candidates if their correlation is lower than a predetermined threshold, creating a first set of CPEs of all the members of channel-sharing candidates, counting a number of channel-sharing candidates a CPE relates to for every CPE, selecting a first CPE related to the fewest number of channel-sharing candidates, creating a second set of CPEs by identifying all the CPEs that the first CPE relates to, and selecting a second CPE related to the fewest number of channel-sharing candidates from the second set of CPEs, wherein the first and second CPEs become two selected CPEs to share the channel.

The construction and method of operation of the techniques described herein, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The drawings accompanying and forming part of this specification are included to depict certain aspects of the techniques described herein. It should be noted that the features illustrated in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wireless communication network and depicting channel sharing techniques among customer premises equipment that share a communication channel for services with a base transceiver station.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method to have a channel shared by two customer premises equipments based on the isolation of spatial signatures.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a second method to have a channel shared by two CPEs based on both the isolation of spatial signatures and path loss.

›DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. The description includes exemplary embodiments, not excluding other embodiments, and changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein.

The method and system described herein reduces inter-user interference and improves the bit error rate (BER) for a group of CPEs in a wireless communications network employing SDMA. The selection of a group of CPEs to share a communication channel is based on the isolation of spatial signatures and path loss differences. The method and system described herein is applicable to any wireless communications network and the term channel refers to any of the conventional multiple access channels such as frequency, time, code or any combination of them. The method can be extended to include more than two CPEs, though the techniques described herein are directed to how to select two CPEs to share a communication channel.

With reference to FIG. 1 , a wireless communication network 5 is shown comprising a base transceiver station (BTS) 10 and multiple customer premises equipments (CPEs) C 1 -C K . The CPEs C 1 -C K wirelessly communicate with the BTS 10 . Assume that there are K CPEs that subscribe to the services of the BTS 10 in a cell of the wireless communications network 5 employing SDMA. By using the method described herein, the BTS 10 dynamically decides which CPEs would share a communication channel.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method to have a channel shared by two CPEs based on the isolation of spatial signatures.

Let {C 1 , C 2 , . . . , C K } denote the set of K CPEs subscribing to the services of the BTS equipped with M antennas. Let the spatial signature of CPE C i be denoted as

h i = [ h i , 1 h i , 2 ⋮ h i , M ] ,

where m ∈(1,2, . . . ,M) and h i,m is a spatial signature associated with antenna m.

Each CPE C i is a candidate for sharing a communication channel with another CPE C j . A partner set χ C i , which includes all the CPEs that could share a communication channel with the CPE C i , is created for each CPE C i . The number of CPEs in the set χ C i is denoted as n C i . A number set, denoted as χ pre — number ={n C 1 , n C 2 , . . . , n C k }, is formed to show the number of partners of each CPE C i .

In step 110 , for each C j , where 1≦j≦K and i≠j, the correlation s i j between CPE C i and CPE C j is calculated according to the following equation:

s i j =  h i H ⁢ h j  =  ∑ m = 1 M ⁢ h i , m * ⁢ h j , m  . ⁢ ( … ) H

denotes a Hermitian operator. If s i j γ 0 , where γ 0 is a predetermined threshold and 0≦γ 0 ≦1, then C j is included in the partner set χ C i of CPE C i .

The number of CPEs in the partner set of CPE C i is denoted as n C i . If n C i >0, C i is included in a set χ pre , i.e., χ pre =χ pre ∪{C i } and n C i is included in the χ pre — number . The set χ pre contains the CPEs that are pre-qualified to share a communication channel with another CPE. Step 110 is repeated for every CPE in the set {C 1 , C 2 , . . . , C K }.

In Step 120 , the smallest element of χ pre — number is selected. If more than one n C i has the same smallest value, a predetermined tie-breaker rule is employed to select only one n C i . For example, the first one of at least two CPEs that have the same smallest number in the χ pre — number is selected. In other words, CPE C i with the smallest number of partners is chosen to be one of the two CPEs selected to share a communication channel.

In step 130 , let χ peer =χ C j . For each CPE C j in the χ peer , the partner set of C i , n C j is included in the set χ peer — number .

In step 140 , the smallest element of χ peer — number is selected. If more than one n C j has the same smallest value, a predetermined tie-breaker rule is employed to select only one n C j . In other words, CPE C j with the smallest number of partners, is chosen to be the other CPE that is to share a communication channel. A pair of CPEs (C i , C j ) is identified to share a communication channel.

In Step 150 , CPEs C i and C j are removed from the χ pre ; n C i and n C j are removed from the χ peer — number . If there is more than one element in χ pre , the pairing process repeats from step 120 . The process continues until no more CPEs could share a communication channel. All feasible CPE pairs in SDMA are identified.

FIG. 3 illustrates a second method to have a channel shared by two CPEs based on the isolation of spatial signatures and path loss.

Let {C 1 , C 2 , . . . , C K } denote the set of K CPEs subscribing to the services of the BTS equipped with M antennas. Let the spatial signature of CPE C i be denoted as

h i = [ h i , 1 h i , 2 ⋮ h i , M ] ,

where m ∈(1,2, . . . ,M) and h i,m is a spatial signature associated with antenna m. Let α i denote the path loss of CPE C i . Each CPE C i is a candidate for sharing a communication channel with another CPE C j .

Two predetermined thresholds γ 1 and Δγ, where 0≦γ 1 ≦1 and 0≦Δγ≦γ 1 , are chosen. The Δγ is the marginal threshold of γ 1 . A good guideline for the selection of Δγ is 0.1γ 1 ≦Δγ≦0.2γ 1 .

In Step 210 , for each C i , where 1≦i≦K, if α i ≧γ 1 +Δγ, then CPE C i is included in the set χ pre , i.e., χ pre =χ pre ∪{C i }. Let L denote the number of CPEs with a path loss that satisfies the above condition.

In step 220 , CPE C i with the smallest α i is selected to be one of the two CPEs to share a communication channel. If more than one CPE has the same smallest path loss, a predetermined tie-breaker rule is employed to select only one. For example, the first of the CPEs that have the smallest path loss is selected.

In step 230 , for each C j in the χ pre , where 1≦j≦L and i≠j, the correlation s i j between CPE C i and CPE C j is calculated according to the following equation:

s i j =  h i H ⁢ h j  =  ∑ m = 1 M ⁢ h i , m * ⁢ h j , m  . ⁢ ( … ) H

denotes a Hermitian operator. CPE C j that has the smallest correlation with CPE C i is identified to be a potential partner.

›DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

In step 240 , for CPEs C i and C j , a value based on spatial signatures and path loss is calculated according to the following equation: α i (1−|h i H h j | 2 ).

In step 250 , if α i (1−|h i H h j | 2 )≧γ 1 , then CPE C j is the other CPE that is to share a communication channel. A pair of CPEs (C i , C j ) is identified to share a communication channel and then CPEs C i and C j are removed from the set χ pre .

If α i (1−|h i H h j | 2 )<γ 1 , CPE C 1 cannot be the one to share a communication channel with CPE C j . CPE C i is then removed from the set χ pre . If more than one CPE remains in the set χ pre , the selection process is repeated from step 220 .

The process continues until no two CPEs could share a communication channel. All pairs of CPEs that could share a communication channel in SDMA are identified.

The above illustration provides many different embodiments or embodiments for implementing different features of the subject matter described herein. Specific embodiments of components and processes are described to help clarify the subject matter described herein. These are, of course, merely embodiments and are not intended to limit the subject matter described herein.

Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in one or more specific examples, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the subject matter described herein and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.

Claims as granted

19 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04W72/54
  • H04B1/38
  • H04W4/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
455/422.1455/561

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2007Apr 2007Jul 2007Oct 2007Jan 2008Apr 2008Jul 2008Oct 2008Jan 2009Apr 2009Jul 2009USPTOApplicantNon-final rejection
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.3 y
840 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
William D Cumming
art unit 2617 · TC 2600
Citations: 3 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 4
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock