RF transmitter with adaptive digital filtering
Granted 19 Feb 2013 · 7 office actions
Assignee: Samsung Electronics
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Joseph R. Cleveland · Examiner: Emmanuel Bayard · AU 2633 · TC 2600
Life of the application
28 dated eventsAbstract
An RF transmitter filter for use in a wireless communication system is disclosed. The filter includes a waveform detector to detect a power level of a transmitted data stream on a symbol-by-symbol basis. The filter also includes a processor to select a combination of filter parameter values according to the power level. The RF transmitter filter selects and adjusts filter parameters (i.e., number of taps or filter length, word length, coefficient quantization, sampling rate, tap delay, sampling bits, etc.) based on signal waveform characteristics. The adjustments limit the transmitted bandwidth and allow transmitted signals to meet an emission mask, while still enabling a receiver to recover the correct sample values of transmitted symbols. The filter further includes a reconfigurable digital filter to filter the transmitted data stream according to the combination of filter parameters.
Description
7 parts›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION AND CLAIM OF PRIORITY
The present application is related to U.S. Provisional Patent No. 60/798,257, filed May 5, 2006, entitled “RF TRANSMITTER WITH ADAPTIVE DIGITAL FILTERING THAT REDUCES SIGNAL PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS”. U.S. Provisional Patent No. 60/798,257 is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure as if fully set forth herein. The present application hereby claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent No. 60/798,257.
›TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present application relates generally to wireless communication networks and, more specifically, to radio frequency (RF) transmitter systems.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Modern communications demand higher signaling rates and performance. Radio frequency (RF) transmitters typically employ fixed pulse-shaping filters such as, for example, raised root cosine (RRC) or finite impulse response (FIR) filters. Such filters are designed to meet the emission mask and enable a receiver to recover the correct sample values of transmitted symbols. These filters, however, are not optimized for a combination of particular signal waveforms, emission constraints, noise, adjacent channel interference and anticipated propagation channel conditions.
There is therefore a need for efficient RF transmitter filters. More particularly, there is a need for reconfigurable digital filters for RF transmitters that reduce processing power and power dissipation.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present disclosure provides a technique for adaptive digital filtering to reduce signal processing requirements.
In one embodiment, a method for providing adaptive digital filtering for use in an RF transmitter is disclosed. The method includes detecting a power level of a signal on a symbol-by-symbol basis. The method also includes selecting a combination of filter parameter values according to the power level. The method further includes filtering the signal according to the combination of filter parameters.
In another embodiment, an RF transmitter filter for use in a wireless communication system is disclosed. The filter includes a module to detect a power level of a signal on a symbol-by-symbol basis. The filter also includes a processor to select a combination of filter parameter values according to the power level. The filter further includes a digital filter reconfigurable according to the combination of filter parameters.
In still another embodiment, an RF transmitter filter for use in a wireless communication system is disclosed. The filter includes a waveform detector to detect a power level of a transmitted data stream on a symbol-by-symbol basis. The filter also includes a processor to select a combination of filter parameter values according to the power level. The filter further includes a reconfigurable digital filter to filter the transmitted data stream according to the combination of filter parameters.
Before undertaking the DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION below, it may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words and phrases used throughout this patent document: the terms “include” and “comprise,” as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion without limitation; the term “or,” is inclusive, meaning and/or; the phrases “associated with” and “associated therewith,” as well as derivatives thereof, may mean to include, be included within, interconnect with, contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, be communicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximate to, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, or the like; and the term “controller” means any device, system or part thereof that controls at least one operation, such a device may be implemented in hardware, firmware or software, or some combination of at least two of the same. It should be noted that the functionality associated with any particular controller may be centralized or distributed, whether locally or remotely. Definitions for certain words and phrases are provided throughout this patent document, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that in many, if not most instances, such definitions apply to prior, as well as future uses of such defined words and phrases.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its advantages, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts:
FIG. 1 a spectrum emission mask for a mobile terminal in a 5 MHz channel;
FIG. 2 illustrates a spectrum emission mask for a base transceiver system in a 5 MHz channel;
FIG. 3 illustrates an adaptive pulse-shaping filter according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 illustrates a FIR filter according to one embodiment of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 5 is a somewhat simplified flow chart illustrating a method for filtering the transmitter of an RF system in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2
FIGS. 1 through 5 , discussed below, and the various embodiments used to describe the principles of the present disclosure in this patent document are by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any way to limit the scope of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented in any suitably arranged wireless network.
Conventional RF transmitters typically include a pulse-shaping filter (not shown) to: (1) limit the transmitted bandwidth so that the transmitted signal meets an emission mask; and (2) enable a receiver to recover the correct sample values of transmitted symbols. The pulse-shaping filter may be any suitable filter such as, for example, a raised root cosine (RRC) or finite impulse response (FIR) filter.
Conventional digital filters used in RF transmitters typically include multiple taps. For wide-band code division multiple access (WCDMA) signals, the digital filter may be a 20-tap filter with a 16-bit input for each of I and Q (16-bit complex) and have a sampling rate twice the chip rate (e.g., 7.68 Msps). This configuration requires approximately 3600 MIPS for the 384 kbps Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service (UMTS) channel. The amount of processing required is based on the product of the number of taps (filter length), the word length (bits per sample), and coefficient length. Higher symbol rates require proportionately greater processing power and thereby more power consumption and heat generation.
FIG. 1 illustrates spectrum emission mask 100 required by, for example, UMTS for a mobile terminal or mobile station (MS) in a 5 MHz channel for WCDMA or high-speed downlink packet access (HSDPA) signals. Emission mask 100 identifies the maximum allowed power of spurious and noise signals in the spectrum outside the authorized transmission channel. For example, emission mask 100 illustrates that as the relative change in frequency separation from the carrier 101 (the x-axis) increases, the relative power density 102 (the y-axes) decreases.
FIG. 2 illustrates spectrum emission mask 200 required by, for example, UMTS for a base transceiver system (BTS) in a 5 MHz channel for signals in, for example, WCDMA or HSDPA. Spectrum emission mask 200 illustrates that as the relative change in frequency separation from the carrier 201 (the x-axis) increases, the relative power density 202 (the y-axis) decreases. In addition, emission mask 200 identifies the maximum allowed power of spurious and noise signals in the spectrum outside the authorized transmission channel. The different transmit power levels 203 , 204 and 205 highlighted in FIG. 2 correspond to different BTS classes or types.
Base stations and mobile stations adapt the transmit power to maintain a set signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) level at the respective receivers to mitigate any near-far problems. As a result, the nominal power level for base stations and mobile stations is often well below the designated maximum power levels referenced in FIGS. 1 and 2 . Furthermore, for signals with a low crest factor in a modulation symbol burst, such as for CDMA, WCDMA or OFDM waveforms, the power level of the burst is well below the designated maximum power levels referenced in FIGS. 1 and 2 . Hence, the filtering requirements for out-of-band emissions can be relaxed and the output emissions still meet the required mask.
FIG. 3 illustrates the reconfigurable architecture of adaptive filter 300 for use in an RF transmitter according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. Adaptive filter 300 reduces processing power and the power dissipation dependency on the signal crest factor (e.g., a waveform). Adaptive filter 300 also reduces the requirements of the emission mask of a transmitted waveform and limits inter-symbol interference (ISI). Adaptive filter 300 may be used in any suitable wireless network such as, for example, systems employing vector modulation such as GSM, CDMA, WCDMA, OFDM, OFDMA technologies, or the like.
According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, adaptive filter 300 adjusts filter parameters (i.e., number of taps or filter length, word length, coefficient quantization, sampling rate, tap delay, sampling bits, etc.) based on signal waveform characteristics. The adaptive adjustments limit the transmitted bandwidth and allow transmitted signals to meet an emission mask, while still enabling a receiver to recover the correct sample values of transmitted symbols.
Adaptive filter 300 includes baseband processor 301 and waveform detector 302 a . Waveform detector 302 a detects the power level of the transmitted signal on a symbol-by-symbol basis. Baseband processor 301 and waveform detector 302 a may be embedded in a modem or may be implemented as a separate, external function in a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Baseband processor 301 may be any suitable processor in accordance with the present disclosure. Similarly, waveform detector 302 a may be any suitable detector in accordance with the present disclosure.
Processor 303 uses an output of envelope detector 302 b to set parameters of digital filters 304 a and 304 b to, for example, minimize the number of instructions per second and the amount of power required by adaptive filter 300 (and in particular digital filters 304 a and 304 b ) to perform. Processor 303 uses an algorithm or a lookup table 305 stored in memory 306 to select the combination of filter parameters (such as the number of taps (filter length), the word length (bits per sample), tap delay and coefficient length). Processor 303 may use any suitable algorithm to select the combination of filter parameters in accordance with the present disclosure. Processor 303 may be any suitable processor in accordance with the present disclosure.
In one embodiment according to the present disclosure, the filter parameters are chosen to minimize the number of instructions per second. In addition, the chosen parameter values should keep the amount of power used consistent while minimizing the ISI for the waveform being transmitted. Processor 303 may also select a combination of filter parameters to achieve a desired efficiency or as is required. For example, processor 303 may set the delay parameters and the tap coefficients and accordingly send a processor control signal to digital filters 304 a and 304 b to achieve the desired requirements.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2
After waveform detector 302 a outputs the I- and Q-data streams, each stream is passed to its respective digital filters 304 a and 304 b . Digital filters 304 a and 304 b process the I- and Q-data streams according to the processor control signals received from processor 303 . For example, digital filters 304 a and 304 b adaptively adjust the filter parameters, based on the signal waveform characteristics previously ascertained and accounted for by processor 303 . Digital filters 304 a and 304 b may use any suitable programmable filter architecture.
After passing through digital filters 304 a and 304 b , the data streams are passed though digital-to-analog converters (DAC) 307 a and 307 b , the data streams are recombined and modulated using modulator 309 and local oscillator (LO) 310 . The recombined data stream is passed through a two-stage driver and power amplifier (Driver/PA) 311 . Finally, the output of Driver/PA 311 is passed through baseband filter 312 .
In one embodiment, the size of digital filters 304 a and 304 a provide enough processing to meet average filter requirements known conventionally plus a predefined margin. Thus, adaptive filter 300 preferably meets all requirements for the streams within a set percentage of the time. In one embodiment, the complexity of digital filters 304 a and 304 b and thus adaptive filter 300 may be reduced by recognizing that each modulation stream has a different coding, thus the crest factor of each transmitted modulation symbol will be distinct.
FIG. 4 illustrates FIR filter 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIR filter 400 includes tap coefficient set {h 0 , h 1 , . . . , h N-1 } 401 a , 401 b , 401 c , 401 d and 401 e (collectively referred to herein as tap coefficient set 401 ). Although only five tap coefficient sets 401 are shown in FIG. 4 , any suitable number of tap coefficient sets 401 may be used in accordance with the present disclosure. FIR filter 400 also includes a delay set {d 1 , . . . , d N-1 } 402 a , 402 b and 402 c (collectively referred to herein as delay set 402 ). Although only three delay sets 402 are shown in FIG. 4 , any suitable number of delay sets may be used in accordance with the present disclosure.
FIR filter 400 further includes tap output set {y 1 , . . . , y N-1 } 403 a and 403 b (collectively referred to herein as tap output set 403 ). Although four tap output sets 403 are shown in FIG. 4 , any suitable number of tap output sets 403 may be used. As described earlier, processor 303 sets the delay parameters and the tap coefficients and accordingly produces a processor control signal 306 a accordingly. In one embodiment, the number of taps used is determined by the selection of the respective output port 404 a , 404 b , 404 c , 404 d and 404 e (collectively referred to herein as output port 404 ) from tap output set {Y} 403 . Although four output ports 404 are shown in FIG. 4 , any suitable number of output ports may be used.
FIG. 5 is a somewhat simplified flow chart illustrating method 500 for adaptively filtering signals in an RF transmitter. In step 505 , a waveform detector, such as waveform detector 302 a , detects the power level of a transmitted data stream on a symbol-by-symbol basis.
In step 510 , a processor, such as processor 303 , evaluates the respective power levels and data streams based on the output of envelope detector 302 b . Processor 303 generates a process control signal that aids in selecting the various process control or filter parameters according to predetermined criteria such as, for example, inter-symbol interference, power consumption and the number of instructions performed by adaptive filter 300 . The predetermined criteria may be referenced from a lookup table, such as lookup table 305 stored in memory 306 . The predetermined criteria may be met by selecting a combination of parameters such as, for example, a number of taps, a filter length, a word length, a coefficient quantization, a sampling rate, bits per sample, a sampling bit, a tap delay and a coefficient length.
In step 515 , processor 303 sends a process control signal to reconfigurable digital filters, such as digital filters 304 a and 304 b . Digital filters 304 a and 304 b process the data streams according to the process control signal. In step 520 , the processed signals are passed on to digital-to-analog converters, such as DAC 307 a and 307 b , and passed through a baseband filter, such as baseband filters 308 a and 308 b . The data streams are then recombined and modulated using a modulator, such as modulator 309 , and a local oscillator, such as LO 310 , in step 525 . The recombined signal is finally output to a two-stage driver and power amplifier, such as Driver/PA 311 , and passed through a baseband filter, such as baseband filter 312 , in step 530 .
Although the present disclosure has been described with an exemplary embodiment, various changes and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art. It is intended that the present disclosure encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims as granted
21 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
3 codes- H04L27/00
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock