USPatent applicationPatented

Dual function polymer micelles

Granted 15 Apr 2014 · 4 office actions

Assignee: Case Western Reserve University

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Jeffrey L. Duerk, Jonathan S. Lewin, Chris Flask, Jinming Gao +3 · Examiner: D L Jones · AU 1618 · TC 1600

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention relates to micelles that are elaborated with functionality useful for imaging and/or selectively targeting tissue, e.g., in the delivery of hydrophobic agents.

Description

13 parts
›This application is a national phase of International…

This application is a national phase of International Application No. PCT/US2005/019308 filed Jun. 2, 2005 and published in the English language, and claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 60/577,142 filed Jun. 6, 2004.

This work was supported by Federal Grant Nos. NIH-R01-CA-90696 and CA-93993. The U.S. government may have certain rights in this invention.

›SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Oct. 29, 2010, is named CASEP887WOUS Substitute Sequence Listing.txt and is 189,054 bytes in size.

›FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to functionalized micelles suitable for use as delivery vehicles.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An important objective in cancer therapy is to selectively deliver therapeutic agents to the tumor tissue. Low water solubility, rapid phagocytic and renal clearance, and systemic toxicity represent three major barriers that limit the therapeutic use of many hydrophobic anti-tumor agents such as doxorubicin (DOX) and paclitaxel. To overcome these limitations, various drug delivery systems, among which polymeric micelles have emerged as one important class, have been developed for delivering various drugs with varying degrees of in vitro and in vivo success. The hydrophobic core of the micelles is a carrier compartment that accommodates anti-tumor drugs, and the outside surface of the micelle consists of a brush-like protective corona that stabilizes the nanoparticles in aqueous solution.

Polymeric micelles in drug delivery applications are typically characterized by high drug-loading capacity, biodegradability, long blood circulation, and controllable drug release profiles. Polymeric micelles from amphiphilic block copolymers are supramolecular core-shell-type assemblies of tens of nanometers in diameter, which can mimic naturally occurring biological transport systems such as lipoproteins and viruses. Recently, polymeric micelles as carriers of hydrophobic drugs have drawn increasing interest, due to their various advantages in drug delivery applications. First, polymeric micelles are highly stable in aqueous solution because of their intrinsic low critical micelle concentration (cmc), which prevents the drug-entrapped micelles from dissociation upon dilution in the blood stream after intravenous injection. Furthermore, the nanoscale size of polymeric micelles can facilitate their extravasations at tumor sites while avoiding renal clearance and non-specific reticuloendothelial (RES) uptake. The micelle cores are usually constructed with biodegradable polymers such as aliphatic polyesters and polypeptide, and water-soluble poly(ethylene glycol) is most frequently used to build the micelle corona because it can effectively stabilize the nanoparticles in blood compartments and reduce the uptake at the reticuloendothelial sites (e.g. liver and spleen). By encapsulating drugs within the micelles, solubility limits for hydrophobic drugs can be exceeded.

Antitumor drugs, such as doxorubicin (DOX) and paclitaxel, are widely used in cancer chemotherapy. Besides their low water solubility, major drawbacks of these drugs are the acute toxicity to normal tissue and inherent multi-drug resistance effect. To reduce the acute toxicity of the free drugs and improve their therapeutic efficacy, various liposome and polymeric micelle systems were designed as delivery vehicles. Hydrophobic drugs can be incorporated into the micelle inner core by both chemical conjugation and physical entrapment, depending on the chemical structure of drugs. For instances, paclitaxel was encapsulated into micelle cores usually by physical entrapment driven by hydrophobic interactions between the drug and the hydrophobic components of polymers. In contrast, doxorubicin can also be chemically bound to the core of polymeric micelles through amidation of doxorubicin amino groups, yielding high loading content. By this way, an efficient doxorubicin delivery system based on doxorubicin-conjugated poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(aspartic acid) block copolymer (PEG-PAsp-(DOX)) has been developed. The conjugation with DOX converted the hydrophilic poly(aspartic acid) into hydrophobic blocks that formed the hydrophobic micelle core and physically entrapped free DOX as well. Recently, DOX conjugation to the micelle cores through an acid-cleavable linkage, such as a hydrazone bond, was reported to be an effective way to enhance the bioavailability of the chemically bound DOX. The hydrazone linkage was cleaved in the endosomes/lysosomes (pH around 5) to yield free DOX molecules which then functioned as the physically entrapped DOX. Compared to the chemical conjugation strategy, physical entrapment of drugs in the micelle cores may be advantageous in terms of easy polymer preparation, simple micelle fabrication, and enhanced drug bioavailability. Although several micellar systems based on non-ionic amphiphilic block polymers such as PEO-PPO-PEO and PEG-b-PBLA have been reported, physically entrapped DOX delivery with polymeric micelles based on the well-known block copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) and biodegradable polyesters is still very limited. Research on micelles has been greatly advanced; however, the ability to achieve high targeting efficiency at the tumor site and associated cells remains a significant challenge for the development of micelle-mediated drug delivery systems.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates in part to micelles that are elaborated with functionality that enables the micelles to selectively target tumor tissue in the delivery of hydrophobic agents. Thus, one aspect of the invention is the elaboration of the outer surface (corona) of the micelle with various protein sequences that selectively bind to certain types of tissue. These functionalized micelles may further comprise a hydrophobic chemotherapeutic agent in the core of the micellar structure, such as doxorubicin (DOX) or paclitaxel. Alternatively or additionally, these micelles may further comprise a hydrophobic MRI imaging agent in the core of the micellar structure, such as superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO).

Another aspect of the invention is the incorporation of radioactive moieties onto the surface of the micellar structure to facilitate single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), which provides information about the availability of radioisotopes with high sensitivity and the capability to simultaneously monitor multiple probes with different emission wavelengths. This technique may be useful in measuring the in vivo pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting efficiency of drug loaded micelles.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows the preparation of cRGD-DOX-micelles.

FIG. 2 a shows the 1 H NMR of MAL-PEG-PCL in CDCl 3 .

FIG. 2 b shows an expanded 1 H NMR of MAL-PEG-PCL in CDCl 3 .

FIG. 3 shows the synthesis of cRGD using solid phase synthesis. Peptide disclosed as SEQ ID NO: 758.

FIG. 4 a shows the size characterization of 0% cRGD-DOX micelles by atomic force microscopy.

FIG. 4 b shows the size characteristics of 0% cRGD-DOX micelles by dynamic light scattering.

FIG. 4 c shows the size characteristics of 76% cRGD-DOX micelles by atomic force microscopy.

FIG. 4 d shows the size characteristics of 76% cRGD-DOX micelles by dynamic light scattering.

FIG. 5 a shows the percentage of micelle uptake in SLK tumor endothelial cells measured by flow cytometry as a function of cRGD density on the micelle surface.

FIG. 5 b shows confocal laser scanning microscopy images of SLK cells treated with 0% cRGD after incubation for 2 h.

FIG. 5 c shows confocal laser scanning microscopy images of SLK cells treated with 16% cRGD after incubation for 2 h.

FIG. 6 a shows a flow cytometry histogram of micelle uptake in SLK tumor endothelial cells as a function of a cRGD density of 0% on the micelle surface.

FIG. 6 b shows a flow cytometry histogram 76% cRGD-micelles in the presence of free RGS ligands (9 mM) in solution.

FIG. 6 c shows a flow cytometry histogram of micelle uptake in SLK tumor endothelial cells as a function of a cRGD density of 76% on the micelle surface.

FIG. 7 shows the preparation of DOTA-PEG-b-PCL micelles.

FIG. 8 a shows a transmission electron micrograph of a typical micelle containing numerous individual SPIO particles.

FIG. 8 b shows a T 2 -weighted MRI image of a control mouse tumor.

FIG. 8 c shows a T 2 -weighted MRI image of a tumor 72 hours after micelle administration.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3

One strategy to achieve cancer-targeted drug delivery is the utilization of unique molecular markers that are specifically overexpressed in the cancerous tissues. It is well known that tumor endothelial cells show increased expression of several cell surface molecules that potentiate cell invasion and proliferation during tumor vascular remodeling and angiogenesis. Thus, one aspect of the invention is the attachment of moieties to the corona of a polymeric micellar structure that can effectively bind to such molecular markers.

In certain embodiments, the micelles are formed from amphiphilic block copolymers. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is selected from poly-γ-benzyl-L-glutamate-polyethylene oxide (PBLG-PEO), poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO), poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(β-benzyl-L-aspartate) (PEG-b-PBLA), and poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PCL-PEG). In most preferred embodiments, the polymer is PCL-PEG.

Micelles may be prepared by adding the copolymer and optionally any additional hydrophobic agent(s) to a hydrophobic solvent in which they are soluble (an organic solvent), the resulting solution being added to water under conditions of vigorous agitation, for example, by ultrasonication, shaking, or other suitable agitation as is well understood in the art. The organic solvent may then be removed by slow evaporation to promote the formation of micelles. The residual organic solvent may then be completely removed to provide the desired micelles in an aqueous medium.

In preferred such embodiments, micelles may contain a hydrophobic agent in the core, wherein a “hydrophobic agent” is an agent that is poorly soluble in water, such as an agent that is more soluble in octanol than it is soluble in water. Preferably, the hydrophobic agent is a chemotherapeutic drug. In certain such embodiments, the chemotherapeutic drug is selected from aminoglutethimide, amsacrine, anastrozole, asparaginase, bcg, bicalutamide, bleomycin, buserelin, busulfan, campothecin, capecitabine, carboplatin, carmustine, chlorambucil, cisplatin, cladribine, clodronate, colchicine, cyclophosphamide, cyproterone, cytarabine, dacarbazine, dactinomycin, daunorubicin, dienestrol, diethylstilbestrol, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, estradiol, estramustine, etoposide, exemestane, filgrastim, fludarabine, fludrocortisone, fluorouracil, fluoxymesterone, flutamide, gemcitabine, genistein, goserelin, hydroxyurea, idarubicin, ifosfamide, imatinib, interferon, irinotecan, ironotecan, letrozole, leucovorin, leuprolide, levamisole, lomustine, mechlorethamine, medroxyprogesterone, megestrol, melphalan, mercaptopurine, mesna, methotrexate, mitomycin, mitotane, mitoxantrone, nilutamide, nocodazole, octreotide, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, pamidronate, pentostatin, plicamycin, porfimer, procarbazine, raltitrexed, rituximab, streptozocin, suramin, tamoxifen, temozolomide, teniposide, testosterone, thioguanine, thiotepa, titanocene dichloride, topotecan, trastuzumab, tretinoin, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, and vinorelbine. In more preferred such embodiments, the chemotherapeutic drug is selected from paclitaxel and doxorubicin.

In certain embodiments, the micelles are functionalized with a targeting moiety. The term “targeting moiety” refers to any molecular structure which assists the micelle in localizing to a particular target area, entering a target cell(s), and/or binding to a target receptor. For example, lipids (including cationic, neutral, and steroidal lipids, virosomes, and liposomes), antibodies, lectins, ligands, sugars, steroids, hormones, nutrients, and proteins can serve as targeting moieties. A number of suitable targeting moieties are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application 2003-0049203, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

Since tumor endothelial cells show increased expression of several cell surface molecules, the attachment of moieties to the corona of a polymeric micellar structure that can effectively bind to such molecular markers may serve as a way to target such tumor tissue. One molecular marker known to be overexpressed in cancerous tissue is α v β 3 integrin, which plays a key role in endothelial cell survival during angiogenesis (Griffioen A. W., Molema G. (2000) Pharmacol. Rev. 52 237-268). The α v β 3 integrin was found to be unregulated in these cells and can induce cell internalization (Brooks P. C. et al. (1994) Cell. 79, 1157-1164). In preferred embodiments, an α v β 3 ligand is bound to the corona of micelles. In certain embodiments, c(Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Lys) (c-RGD) is bound to the corona of micelles.

Examples of other suitable targeting moieties include but are not limited to lipoproteins, glycoproteins, asialoglycoproteins, transferrin, toxins, carbohydrates, cell surface receptor ligands, antibodies, and homing peptides. Synthetic homing peptides with the desired levels of affinity and/or selectivity for specific organs or tissues may be employed as targeting moieties, for example as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,576,239, 6,306,365, 6,303,573, 6,296,832, 6,232,287, 6,180,084, 6,174,687, 6,068,829, and 5,622,699, U.S. patent applications 2001/0046498, 2002/0041898, 2003/0008819, and 2003/0077826, and PCT application PCT/GB02/04017 (WO 03/020751), all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Methods for identifying and using these and other tissue-homing peptides are known in the art, see for example W. Arap et al., Science 279:377-380 (1998); R. Pasqualini, and E. Ruoslahti, Nature 380:364-366 (1996); D. Rajotte et al., J. Clin. Invest. 102:430-437 (1998); P. Laakkonen et al., Nature Medicine 8(7):751-755 (2002); and K. Essler, E. Ruoslahti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(4):2252-2257 (2002), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Suitable tissue-specific homing peptides include, but are not limited to, the sequences in Table 1

In addition, peptides that may be useful for targeting tumors in vivo include, but are not limited to, the peptide sequences shown in Table 2, which have been described as potential targeting peptides for tumor cells

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3

Incorporation of a targeting peptide or other targeting moiety into the outer shell may be accomplished by any of the methods known in the art of targeted drug delivery. Suitable methods include but are not limited to covalent attachment of a targeting moiety to one or more components of the outermost shell, either directly or via linkers and electrostatic binding of appropriately charged molecules. These and other methods are well known in the art; see for example A. Coombes et al., Biomaterials 18:1153-1161, 1997.

Another aspect of the invention relates to the functionalization of the surface of the micelles with one or more imaging agents. An “imaging agent” is a moiety suitable for generating a detectable signal, e.g., using a technique such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography (SPECT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as a radionuclides, unpaired spin atoms and free radicals (e.g., Fe, lanthanides, and Gd), and contrast agents (e.g., chelated (DTPA) manganese). A number of suitable imaging agents that can be employed in the micelles of the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 2003-0049203, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

For example, SPECT can be used for molecular imaging studies to assess both drug distribution and physiological effects with high sensitivity of detection. Furthermore, the use of SPECT allows the simultaneous observation of multiple probes with different emission wavelengths. In certain embodiments, the radioactive moiety is selected from 225 Ac, 227 Ac, 241 Am, 72 As, 74 As, 211 At, 198 Au, 7 Be, 212 Bi, 213 Bi, 75 Br, 77 Br, 11 C, 14 C, 48 Ca, 109 Cd, 139 Ce, 141 Ce, 252 Cf, 55 Co, 57 Co, 60 Co, 51 Cr, 130 Cs, 131 Cs, 137 Cs, 61 Cu, 62 Cu, 165 Dy, 152 Eu, 155 Eu, 18 F, 55 Fe, 59 Fe, 64 Ga, 67 Ga, 68 Ga, 153 Gd, 68 Ge, 3 H, 122 I, 123 I, 124 I, 125 I, 131 I, 132 I, 111 In, 115m In, 191m Ir, 192 Ir, 81m Kr, 177 Lu, 51 Mn, 52 Mn, 99 Mo, 13 N, 95 Nb, 15 O, 191 Os, 194 Os, 32 P, 33 P, 203 Pb, 212 Pb, 103 Pd, 109 Pd, 238 Pu, 223 Ra, 226 Ra, 82 Rb, 186 Re, 188 Re, 105 Rh, 97 Ru, 103 Ru, 35 S, 72 Se, 75 Se, 28 Si, 145 Sm, 153 Sm, 117m Sn, 85 Sr, 89 Sr, 90 Sr, 178 Ta, 179 Ta, 182 Ta, 149 Tb, 96 Tc, 99m Tc, 228 Th, 229 Th, 201 Tl, 170 Tm, 171 Tm, 188 W, 127 Xe, 88 Y, 90 Y, 91 Y, 169 Yb, 62 Zn, 65 Zn, 95 Zr, and 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V 28 . Additionally, 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V 28 is an available apoptosis probe available when using SPECT, wherein Annexin V is a human protein known to bind phosphatidylserine on the exterior of apoptotic cells.

In certain embodiments, the imaging moiety may be incorporated onto the surface of the micellar structure by fabricating a micelle with a chelating group on the surface that is capable of chelating an imaging moiety. This can be accomplished by, for example, synthesizing block copolymers of PEG and PCL, some of which contain a terminal methyl group (MPEG-PCL), and others in which the PEG chain is covalently linked to the chelating group.

In certain embodiments, the chelating group is selected from 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid bis(methylamide) (DTPA-BMA), N,N′-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)diethylenetriamine-N,N′,N″-triacetic acid (DTPA-BP), and trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N′,N″,N′″-tetraacetic acid (CDTA). In preferred embodiments, the chelating group is DOTA.

Examples of radioactive imaging moieties include, but are not limited to, 225 Ac, 227 Ac, 241 Am, 72 As, 74 As, 211 At, 198 Au, 7 Be, 212 Bi, 213 Bi, 75 Br, 77 Br, 11 C, 14 C, 48 Ca, 109 Cd, 139 Ce, 141 Ce, 252 Cf, 55 Co, 57 Co, 60 Co, 51 Cr, 130 Cs, 131 Cs, 137 Cs, 61 Cu, 62 Cu, 165 Dy, 152 Eu, 155 Eu, 18 F, 55 Fe, 59 Fe, 64 Ga, 67 Ga, 68 Ga, 153 Gd, 68 Ge, 3 H, 122 I, 123 I, 124 I, 125 I, 131 I, 132 I, 111 In, 115m In, 191m Ir, 192 Ir, 81m Kr, 177 Lu, 51 Mn, 52 Mn, 99 Mo, 13 N, 95 Nb, 15 O, 191 Os, 194 Os, 32 P, 33 P, 203 Pb, 212 Pb, 103 Pd, 109 Pd, 238 Pu, 223 Ra, 226 Ra, 82 Rb, 186 Re, 188 Re, 105 Rh, 97 Ru, 103 Ru, 35 S, 72 Se, 75 Se, 28 Si, 145 Sm, 153 Sm, 117m Sn, 85 Sr, 89 Sr, 90 Sr, 178 Ta, 179 Ta, 182 Ta, 149 Tb, 96 Tc, 99m Tc, 228 Th, 229 Th, 201 Tl, 170 Tm, 171 Tm, 188 W, 127 Xe, 88 Y, 90 Y, 91 Y, 169 Yb, 62 Zn, 65 Zn, 95 Zr, and 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V 28 . In preferred embodiments, the radioactive moiety is capable of being chelated by a chelating agent and is selected from 225 Ac, 227 Ac, 241 Am, 198 Au, 7 Be, 212 Bi, 213 Bi, 48 Ca, 109 Cd, 139 Ce, 141 Ce, 252 Cf, 55 Co, 57 Co, 60 Co, 51 Cr, 130 Cs, 131 Cs, 137 Cs, 61 Cu, 62 Cu, 165 Dy, 152 Eu, 155 Eu, 18 F, 55 Fe, 59 Fe, 64 Ga, 67 Ga, 68 Ga, 153 Gd, 68 Ge, 111 In, 115m In, 191m Ir, 192 Ir, 177 Lu, 51 Mn, 52 Mn, 99 Mo, 95 Nb, 194 Os, 203 Pb, 212 Pb, 103 Pd, 109 Pd, 238 Pu, 223 Ra, 226 Ra, 82 Rb, 186 Re, 188 Re, 105 Rh, 97 Ru, 103 Ru, 145 Sm, 153 Sm, 117m Sn, 85 Sr, 89 Sr, 90 Sr, 178 Ta, 179 Ta, 182 Ta, 149 Tb, 96 Tc, 99m Tc, 228 Th, 229 Th, 201 Tl, 170 Tm, 171 Tm, 188 W, 88 Y, 90 Y, 91 Y, 169 Yb, 62 Zn, 65 Zn, 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V 28 , and 95 Zr. In certain embodiments, the radioactive moiety is 111 In, 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V 28 , or 99m Tc. In certain such embodiments, the radioactive moiety is 111 In.

Yet another aspect of the invention relates to micelles containing within the hydrophobic core, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast imaging agent either alone or in combination with another hydrophobic agent and/or functionalization of the corona of the micelle. Examples of such contrast agents, include, but are not limited to, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadoteridol, gadoterate meglumine, mangafodipir trisodium, gadodiamide, gadoversetamide, and superparamagnetic iron oxide. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles are a class of MRI contrast agents that provide extremely strong enhancement of proton relaxation. In contrast to low molecular weight “T1” paramagnetic metal chelates such as Gd-DTPA, SPIO nanoparticles are classified as T2 negative contrast agents, with MR sensitivity approximately 1000 times higher than T1 agents. SPIO agents are composed of iron oxide nanocrystals which create a large, dipolar magnetic field gradient that creates a relaxation effect on nearby water molecules. According to their sizes and applications, SPIO nanoparticles have been classified into four different categories: large, standard, ultrasmall, and monocrystalline agents. Large SPIO agents are mainly used for gastrointestinal lumen imaging, while standard SPIO agents are used for liver and spleen imaging. When the SPIO nanoparticles are in the range of 20-40 nm (ultrasmall category), they can be injected to visualize lymph node metastases. The smallest monocrystalline SPIO agents are used for tumor-specific imaging when attached to monoclonal antibodies, growth factors, and antigens.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3

In preferred embodiments, the MRI contrast imaging agent is superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO). FIG. 8A shows a transmission electron micrograph of a typical micelle containing numerous individual SPIO particles, wherein the white circle denotes the approximate boundary of the micelle core.

Another aspect of the invention relates to method for the treatment of cancer, comprising administering micelles of the present invention, wherein the micellar structure comprises an encapsulated chemotherapeutic agent. In certain such embodiments, the coronas of the micelles are functionalized with peptides that are capable of targeting tumor cells. Additionally, or alternatively, the corona of the micelle is functionalized with a peptide that is capable of targeting a specific tissue in the body, preferably a peptide selected from either Table 1 or 2.

In certain embodiments, the coronas of the micelles are functionalized with chelating agents that are capable of chelating a radioactive moiety. In preferred such embodiments, the micelles further comprise a radioactive moiety that is capable of being chelated by the chelating agent. A further aspect of the invention relates to a method for monitoring the delivery of a hydrophobic agent, comprising administering micelles, wherein the micellar structure comprises an encapsulated hydrophobic agent, and the hydrophobic agent is an MRI contrast agent. In preferred embodiments, the micellar structure further comprises a functionalized corona and/or an additional hydrophobic agent. In more preferred embodiments, the additional hydrophobic agent is a chemotherapeutic agent.

Another aspect of the invention is a pharmaceutical composition, comprising micelles as described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” is employed herein to refer to those ligands, materials, compositions, and/or dosage forms which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of human beings and animals without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response, or other problem or complication, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio.

The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” as used herein means a pharmaceutically acceptable material, composition or vehicle, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, excipient, solvent or encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting the subject chemical from one organ or portion of the body, to another organ or portion of the body. Each carrier must be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not injurious to the patient. Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include: (1) sugars, such as lactose, glucose, and sucrose; (2) starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; (3) cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, and cellulose acetate; (4) powdered tragacanth; (5) malt; (6) gelatin; (7) talc; (8) excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; (9) oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil, and soybean oil; (10) glycols, such as propylene glycol; (11) polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol, and polyethylene glycol; (12) esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; (13) agar; (14) buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; (15) alginic acid; (16) pyrogen-free water; (17) isotonic saline; (18) Ringer's solution; (19) ethyl alcohol; (20) phosphate buffer solutions; and (21) other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations. In certain embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are non-pyrogenic, i.e., do not induce significant temperature elevations when administered to a patient.

As used herein, the term “treating” or “treatment” includes reversing, reducing, or arresting the symptoms, clinical signs, and underlying pathology of a condition in manner to improve or stabilize a subject's condition.

The present invention may be further appreciated upon consideration of the following illustrative and non-limiting examples.

›EXAMPLES · 1 of 4

Synthesis of Diblock Copolymers of PCL and MPEG

Detailed synthetic method for this class of block copolymers was described in a recent publication (X. Shuai et al., Macromolecules (2003) 36 5751-5759. Briefly, the diblock copolymers (MPEG-b-PCL), with yields >95%, were synthesized by ring-opening polymerization of s-caprolactone at 115° C. using MPEG as a macro-initiator and Sn(Oct) 2 as a catalyst. The degree of polymerization of the PCL block was calculated by comparing integrals of characteristic peaks of the PCL block at ˜2.25 ppm and PEG block at 3.35 ppm in the 1 H NMR spectrum.

Characterization of Copolymers

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectral studies were carried out with a BIO-RAD FTS-575C FTIR spectrometer in the range between 4000 and 750 cm −1 , with a resolution of 2 cm −1 . Powdery samples were compressed into KBr pellets for the FTIR measurements. 1 H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 600-MHz NMR spectrometer in deuterated water (D 2 O) or chloroform (CDCl 3 ) at room temperature.

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was employed to determine the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution. GPC analysis was carried out using a PLgel 5 μm Mixed-D 300×7.5 mm column (Polymer Laboratories) with THF as an eluent (1 mL/min) and polystyrene standards for column calibration. 20 μL samples were injected. The eluent was analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer Series 200 differential refractive index (RI) detector.

Preparation of DOX-Loaded Micelles

Polymeric micelles containing DOX were prepared as following: MPEG-b-PCL copolymer (10 mg) and doxorubicin (2 mg) were dissolved in THF (2 mL) in a glass vial. Afterwards, the solution was added dropwise to pure water (20 mL) under vigorous ultrasonic agitation using a Type 60 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific) at a power level of 10. The beaker was then open to air overnight, allowing slow evaporation of THF and formation of micelles. The residual THF was completely removed by vacuum distillation with a rotary evaporator. The micelle solution concentrated to 5 mL was filtered with a syringe filter (pore size: 0.45 μm) to eliminate the polymer and DOX aggregates, and then filtered through a MILLIPORE Centrifugal Filter Device (Mw cut-off: 100,000 Da) to remove free DOX dissolved in the micelle solution.

The micelles thus obtained were characterized with photon correlation spectroscopy. Measurements were performed at 25° C. on a 90 Plus Particle Size Analyzer from Brookhaven Instruments Corporation. Scattered light was detected at 90° angle and collected on an autocorrelator. For each sample, data obtained from five measurements were averaged to yield the size and size distribution.

Determination of DOX-Loading Content (DLC)

The DOX-loading content (DLC) was defined as the weight percentage of DOX in the micelle. DLC was quantified by determining the absorbance at 485 nm using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 20 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. First, the micelle solutions were frozen and lyophilized to yield the solid micelle samples. Then the dried samples were redissolved in a mixture of chloroform and DMSO (1:1, v/v) for the UV-Vis measurement. DOX solutions of various concentrations were prepared, and the absorbance at 485 nm was measured to generate a calibration curve for the DLC calculations from various micelles.

In Vitro Release of DOX from Polymer Micelles

Freeze-dried micelle samples (15 mg each) were re-suspended in PBS or acetate buffered solutions and transferred into dialysis tubing (Mw cut-off: 50,000 Da, supplied by Spectrum Laboratories Inc., USA). The tubing was placed into 50 mL PBS or acetate buffered solutions. Release study was performed at 37° C. in a New Brunswick Scientific C24 Incubator Shaker. At selected time intervals, buffered solution outside the dialysis bag was removed for UV-Vis analysis and replaced with fresh buffer solution. DOX concentration was calculated based on the absorbance intensity at 485 nm.

Hemolysis Study

Blood was freshly obtained from a male beagle dog and collected in heparin-coated tubes. Blood was washed three times with PBS and collected by centrifugation at 2,800 rpm for 5 min. Micelle solutions were prepared at different concentrations in the PBS buffer, and 100 μL of the erythrocyte suspension were added to 900 μl of micelle solutions. The samples were incubated for 60 min at 37° C. in a New Brunswick Scientific C24 Incubator Shaker. The release of hemoglobin was measured by UV-Vis analysis of the supernatant at 540 nm after centrifugation at 12,000 g for 60 min. The complete hemolysis was achieved by incubating the same amount of erythrocytes with 0.2% Triton X-100, and all hemolysis data points are presented as the percentage of the complete hemolysis.

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)

Free DOX and DOX-containing micelles were incubated in MCF-7 cell culture for 2 and 24 hours before confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) examination. To identify the micelle location, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes, Inc.) and culture media were replaced with PBS during microscopy. Samples were examined by CLSM using a Zeiss LSM 510 (Zurich, Switzerland) with a confocal plane of 300 nm. Hoechst 33342 and DOX were excited at 352 and 485 nm with emissions at 455 and 595 nm, respectively.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Study Against MCF-7 Breast Tumor Cells

Human MCF-7 breast cancer cells were seeded onto 48-well plates with a seeding density of 7,000 cells/well. Cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640, Sigma) media supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 5,000 units/ml penicillin, 5 mg/ml streptomycin, 0.1 mg/ml gentamicin sulfate and Amphotericin-B, 25 mM KCl, 25 mM D-glucose, and incubated at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO 2 . Cells were incubated for one day, and then micelle or free DOX solutions were added. After one or five days, cells were harvested and DNA levels were analyzed through a DNA assay with a Perkin-Elmer HTS 7000 Bioassay Reader. The cytotoxicity of DOX and DOX-containing micelles in aqueous solution was analyzed and compared.

›EXAMPLES · 2 of 4

Synthesis of Maleimide-Terminated Block Copolymer (MAL-PEG-PCL)

In contrast to the reported ε-caprolactone polymerization procedure with stannous (II) octoate as a catalyst (X. Shuai, T. Merdan, A. K. Schaper, F. Xi, T. Kissel, Bioconjug. Chem . (2004) 15 441-448), synthesis of MAL-PEG-PCL, as shown in FIG. 1 , must be conducted at a lower temperature due to the thermal susceptibility of the maleimide end groups. Reaction at 68° C. led to desired molecular weights of PCL segments (e.g., 2.4 kD), while greatly reducing the thermal decomposition of maleimide to a negligible level. DOX-loaded, MAL-PEG-PCL micelles were prepared by a solvent-evaporation method. Different amounts of methoxy-terminated MPEG-PCL copolymer were also introduced to control maleimide density at the micelle surface, which subsequently controls the cRGD density (5, 16, and 76% of all PEG chains).

FIG. 2 a shows the 1 H NMR spectrum of MAL-PEG-PCL copolymer in CDCl 3 . Resonances of the PEG methylene protons (mainly at 3.64 ppm) and PCL protons (1.38, 1.65, 2.31 and 4.06 ppm) were observed. A small triplet shown at 4.2 ppm was attributed to proton resonance of the methyleneoxyl group linking PCL and PEG blocks. The integration intensity of maleimide vinyl protons at 6.74 ppm confirms that the maleimide group in MAL-PEG-PCL copolymers remained intact as in the MAL-PEG-OH. These data strongly demonstrated that the desired block copolymers were successfully synthesized. The number-averaged molecular weight of PCL blocks was calculated to be 2.4 kD using the integral intensity of PCL proton at 2.31 ppm versus that of the PEG proton at 3.64 ppm. To ensure the localization of cRGD on the surface of micelles, we used a post-micellar modification strategy to prepare cRGD-functionalized micelles as shown in FIG. 1 . The NMR spectrum of the freeze-dried micelles in D 2 O strongly suggests the core-shell structure of DOX-loaded micelles as shown in FIG. 2 b . The micelle corona shells consisting of PEG blocks were well solvated in D 2 O and showed clear 1 H NMR signals. In contrast, DOX was loaded inside the solid PCL cores of micelles, and thus resonance peaks of both PCL blocks and DOX molecules were significantly reduced due to their insufficient chain mobility in D 2 O. Moreover, successful conjugation of cRGDfK onto the well-solvated PEG corona shells was verified by the resonance peaks of phenyl protons of cRGDfK at 7.4 ppm and complete disappearance of maleimide peak at 6.74 ppm ( FIG. 1B ).

Synthesis of cRGD Using Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis Chemistry

The synthetic scheme for cRGD as shown in FIG. 3 is revised based on a reported procedure by Schatzlein et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett . (2002) 12 547-549. NovaSyn TGT alcohol resin (1.25 mmol) (Novabiochem, Calif.) was converted to its active chloride form with acetyl chloride (1 ml/g resin) (62.5 mmol) in toluene for 3 h at 60° C. The resin was then washed with dry toluene and dichloromethane (DCM). The synthesis of linear peptide started with the attachment of aspartic acid, by mixing the chlorinated resin with a solution of Fmoc-Asp-OAll (2.5 eq.) and N, N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) (10 eq.) in dry DCM at rt for 1.5-2.5 h. The solution of DCM, methanol and DIPEA was added to cap the unreacted sites of resin. After 30 min the resin was washed with dimethylformamide (DMF). The Fmoc protecting group was removed with a solution of piperidine-DMF (1:4) at rt for 4 min, 2 times. The rest of amino acids were added consecutively (Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, Fmoc-Lys(Dde)-OH and Fmoc-D-Phe-OH) using standard Fmoc strategy. The amino acid (2 eq.) was added first followed by N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)uronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU) (2 eq.) and DIPEA (4 eq.) and allowed to react for 1.5 h at rt. The C-terminal allyl ester group of the aspartic acid was removed after addition of the last amino acid with palladium tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) (Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 ) (3 eq.) in a solution of chloroform, acetic acid and N-methylmorpholine for 2 h at rt. The mixture was washed with DIPEA in DMF followed by 0.5% w/w diethyldithiocarbamic acid sodium salt in DMF. The head-to-tail cyclization was preformed by removal of the N-terminal Fmoc group before addition of HATU (2 eq.) and DIPEA (4 eq.) in DMF at rt for 16 h. The protecting group of the amino side-chain of lysine (4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxocyclohex-1-ylidene)ethyl, (Dde)) was removed by hydrazine monohydrate-DMF (2:98) for 3 min at rt, 3 time. The thiol addition was preformed by swelling resin with DIPEA (15 eq.) in DMF, followed by addition of S-acetylthioglycolic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (SATA) solution (2 eq.) in DMF (15 mg/mL) for 2 h at rt. The resin was then washed with DMF followed by DCM. Next, the protecting group of arginine (pentamethyl-dihydrobenzofuran-5-sulfonyl, (Pfb)) was removed using TFA-DCM (1:1) for 2 h before washing with trifluoroacetic acid-DCM (1:9). The solutions were concentrated and precipitated with cold ether several times. The precipitate was then redissolved in aqueous buffer, purified using reverse phase HPLC and lyophilized to give cRGD peptide (90 mg, 10% yield based on initial loading of resin).

Preparation of cRGD-DOX-Micelles.

20 mg of MAL-PEG-PCL and 2 mg of doxorubicin were dissolved in 0.5 mL THF in a glass vial. Next, the mixture was slowly added into 10 mL of an aqueous solution of 0.05 M HEPES and 0.01 M EDTA under sonication (60 Sonic Dismembrator, Fisher Scientific). The mixture was vigorously stirred under argon for 3 h to remove THF. Then different amounts of c(RGDf(ε-S-acetylthioacetyl)K and 0.05 M hydroxyamine in HEPES/EDTA aqueous solution were added into solutions of micelles with 5, 16, and 76% maleimide density. The conjugation was allowed to occur for 4 h followed by filtration through a Millipore centrifugal filter (pore size 0.45 μm) to remove DOX aggregates in micelle solution. Then the cRGD-micelles were dialyzed with Spectra/Por dialysis membrane (molecular weight cutoff=50,000 Da) until free cRGD was completely removed. Micelles were then characterized by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy. Micelle solutions were then lyophilized to obtain the powdery form. 1 H NMR was used to confirm the formation of core-shell structure and conjugation of cRGD to micelles. The strong resonance of methylene proton in PEG was detected where as all of caprolactone proton resonance were hardly observed demonstrating the core-shell structure of these micelles. The successful conjugation of cRGD onto the surface of micelles was verified by the appearance of phenyl protons of cRGD at 7.4 ppm.

›EXAMPLES · 3 of 4

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

Two group of micelles were used for AFM study. The first group was DOX-micelles without cRGD ligand and the second group was DOX-micelles with 76% cRGD density. The micelle suspension (2 μL) was placed on the mica surface, and allowed to dry at room temperature overnight before imaging with an atomic force microscope (Multimode, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, Calif.) operated in tapping mode using a silicon cantilever (Pointprobe, Nanoworld, Switzerland). The constant force mode was used with a scan frequency of 2 Hz. Both non-functionalized and 76% cRGD containing micelles show discrete and round-shaped nanoparticles. These results were shown in FIGS. 4 a and 4 c . Micelles with 76% cRGD attachment (43.2±3.9 nm, n=29) showed a mean size slightly larger than that of RGD-free micelles (37.5±2.6 nm, n=29).

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

DLS was performed on a 90 Plus Particle Size Analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation). Scattered light was detected at 90° at room temperature and collected on an autocorrelator. The data for each sample was obtained in five measurements and the average number was used. The same two groups of micelles as in AFM studies were used for DLS characterization. The sizes of these micelles are 20.9±1.7 and 24.4±2.7 nm for cRGD-free and 76% cRGD micelles, respectively. The results were shown in FIGS. 4 b and 4 d.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

SLK cells were seeded at 125,000 cells/well in 6-well plates in 2 mL DMEM with 10% FBS. After 24 h, 1 mg of micelles (from 3.3 mg/ml micelle suspension) for each micelle formulation with different cRGD density (0, 5, 16, 76% cRGD) was added into each well and incubated at 37° C. for 2 h. Then, cells were washed, trypsinized and neutralized. After centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 min, cells were re-suspended in 1 mL PBS, followed by filtration and analysis using flow cytometry. Cell uptake was found to increase up to 30-fold with 76% cRGD-DOX-micelles compared to those not attached with cRGD (0% cRGD). In the control experiment, SLK cells were first incubated with a free blocking peptide, Ala-Ala-Arg-Gly-Asp-Tyr (AARGDY) (SEQ ID NO: 757), and then co-incubated with 76% cRGD-functionalized micelles. Almost 100% inhibition by AARGDY (SEQ ID NO: 757) at 9 mM concentration was observed as demonstrated by the flow cytometry histograms as shown in FIG. 6 .

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)

DOX-micelles with 0 and 16% cRGD density (0.5 mg/well) were incubated with SLK cells (6000 cells/well) culture wells for 2 hrs. Before the CLSM examination, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes, Inc.). Cells were examined by a Zeiss LSM 510 microscope (Zurich, Switzerland, laser: Ar 351-364 nm, Ar 458-488 nm) with a confocal plane of 300 nm. Doxorubicin and Hoechst 33342 were excited at 485 and 352 nm, respectively. The emission wavelength of doxorubicin and Hoechst 33342 are 595 and 455 nm, respectively. A significantly increased amount of micelle uptake was observed in micelles with 16% cRGD surface density as shown in FIG. 5 c compared to those without cRGD as shown in FIG. 5 b . This result is consistent with those from flow cytometry studies as shown in FIG. 5 a.

Synthesis of DOTA-PEG-PCL

The MPEG-PCL and amino group terminated PEG-PCL polymer (H 2 N-PEG-PCL) are synthesized following reported procedures (Shuai, X. T. et al., Macromolecules, 2003. 36 5751-5759; Deng, M. X. et al., Biomaterials, (2004) 25 3553-3558). Briefly, synthesis of H 2 N-PEG-PCL is accomplished by the metalation of acetonitrile with potassium naphthalide to initiate living anionic ring-opening-polymerization with ethylene oxide first and ε-caprolactone (ε-CL) second. Hydrogenation of the CN-PEG-PCL copolymer using Pd/C as catalyst provides a diblock copolymer with a functionalizable amino group (H 2 N-PEG-PCL). To synthesize the DOTA containing PEG-PCL polymer (DOTA-PEG-PCL), DOTA-NHS ester (Macrocyclics, Inc., Dallas, Tex.) is added to a H 2 N-PEG-PCL solution in organic solvent. The subsequent copolymer is purified by precipitation in diethyl ether and hexane. Both polymers can be manufactured with various PEG and PCL chain lengths, which can be used to modify both the micelle size and doxorubicin loading within the micelles.

After syntheses of both block copolymers, polymer micelles that incorporate different amounts of chelating agent are fabricated. The amount of chelating agent can be controlled by varying the weight ratio of DOTA-PEG-PCL to MPEG-PCL used. Micelles with 1, 3, and 5% (w/w) DOTA-PEG-PCL are fabricated using a phase inversion technique. A schematic illustrating this process is shown in FIG. 7 . Micelle size is characterized through the use of dynamic light scattering and TEM, while drug content and release from the micelles is measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy.

Incorporation of Radioactive Moieties

Immediately prior to each imaging experiment, 111 In is added to each micelle formulation to allow binding of the metal ion to the DOTA chelating group. Excess free 111 In ions are removed through a gel filtration process before imaging, and each micelle sample is serially diluted to generate vials containing a logarithmic range of known concentrations. Multiple vials containing concentrations of each of the three formulations are then imaged via both SPECT and computed tomography (CT), and the resulting imaging activity of each vial is plotted against micelle concentration for that formulation. In this manner, the lower detection limit as well as a calibration value which can be used to convert SPECT activity to micelle concentration is determined for each of the three formulations.

Following in vitro calibration, each of the three micelle formulations are injected into the tail vein of two mice with breast tumors. An additional two sets of mice, one with drug-containing, unlabeled micelles and another with drug-free labeled micelles, are injected and imaged as controls.

Additionally, a separate SPECT imaging probe, 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V can be introduced to simultaneously measure cell apoptosis. One unique property of SPECT imaging is its ability to discern activity from multiple probes that emit gamma photons of different energy, in this case 245 keV for 111 In and 140 keV for 99m Tc. Prior to use in animals, an in vitro calibration similar to that described above is performed. In this study, vials containing known concentrations of both 111 In-labeled micelles and 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V are prepared and used to generate limit of detection values for the simultaneous detection of both labels. Animal groups will be the same as those used for 111 In imaging with the addition of a group to receive systemic free doxorubicin to ensure that the tumors in this model are susceptible to doxorubicin treatment. The 99m Tc-labeled Annexin V is administered via the tail vein prior to each imaging session, and SPECT imaging is used to generate both micelle concentration and apoptosis density measurements. The results from this section are confirmed via histological measurements taken after the animals are sacrificed. Tumor volume is measured by gross tissue measurement, doxorubicin concentration in tissue is obtained by fluorescence microscopy, apoptosis is validated using TUNEL stained sections, and micelle concentrations are confirmed by scintillation counting of extracted tissues.

›EXAMPLES · 4 of 4

In Vivo Efficacy Data to Optimize the Design of Drug-Loaded Micelles

Different micelle formulations are compared based on their treatment efficacy as measured by total micelle accumulation, apoptotic response, and tumor volume change, all of which are measured non-invasively. Five different micelle formulations are used to investigate the effects of two different micelle properties: size and PEG chain length. These two parameters affect the blood circulations times as well as the extravasation efficiency across the tumor endothelium. Micelle size will be investigated using three micelle formulations with the same PEG length (MW 5 kD) and different PCL lengths (2, 5, and 10 kD). Alternatively, PEG chain length effects are elucidated by using micelle formulations with a fixed PCL length (5 kD) and varying PEG size (2, 5, and 10 kD), for a total of five experimental groups. Control mice are injected with labeled micelles containing no doxorubicin. Each group contains approximately 6 subjects. Once optimized, the micelles are compared directly with systemically administered, dose-matched doxorubicin on the same measures.

Additionally, the data from micelle comparison is used to develop a model to correlate treatment efficacy with micelle accumulation and apoptosis as measured by SPECT. Relationships between micelle accumulation, tumor apoptosis, and tumor volume change over the one week period of monitoring are investigated in order to create a method of predicting the tumor volume change of the tumors based on early (<24 hours) measurements of micelle accumulation and tumor apoptosis.

Micelles Containing SPIO Particles

In FIG. 8 a , hydrophobic SPIO particles of approximately 4 nm in diameter were incorporated into the hydrophobic micellar core. In vitro imaging of particle solutions was performed on a Siemens Sonata 1.5T clinical MRI scanner using a fast low angle shoot (FLASH) pulse sequence, and the T 2 contrast effect of the micelles was quantified. Particle T 2 relaxivity values ranged from 76-102 (mM Fe*s) −1 , suggesting that the particles had largely retained their contrast despite micellar incorporation. For in vivo studies, micelle solutions were injected into the tail vein of breast tumor bearing mice (the bi-transgenic mice bearing both the MMTV-c-neu and LHCTP transgenes proposed for use in this study) at and imaged with T 2 -weighted sequences at 1 hour and 72 hours after micelle injection. By 72 hours, the peripheral region of the tumor had darkened noticeably, indicating accumulation of SPIO-containing micelles in the region as shown in FIGS. 8 b and 8 c . MRI has some intrinsic difficulties, however, such as relatively low sensitivity compared to nuclear medicine and problems distinguishing contrast effects from the anatomical background, that promote the development of other imaging modalities for quantitative micelle tracking.

Equivalence

Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the compounds and methods of use thereof described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the following claims.

All of the above-cited references and publications are hereby incorporated by reference.

›Tables in the description — 2
TABLE 1
SEQSEQ
IDID
NO:NO:
Brain:
CLSSRLDAC1CVLRGGRC2
CNSRLQLRC3CGVRLGC4
CKDWGRIC5CLDWGRIC6
CTRITESC7CETLPAC8
CRTGTLFC9CGRSLDAC10
CRHWFDVVC11CANAQSHC12
CGNPSYRC13WRCVLREGPAGGCAWFNRHRL14
YPCGGEAVAGVSSVRTMCSE15LNCDYQGTNPATSVSVPCTV16
CNSRLHLRCCENWWGDVC17WRCVLREGPAGGGAWFNRHRL18
Kidney:
CLPVASC19CGAREMC20
CKGRSSAC21CWARAQGC22
CLGRSSVC23CTSPGGSC24
CMGRWRLC25CVGECGGC26
CVAWLNC27CRRFQDC28
CLMGVHC29CKLLSGVC30
CFVGHDLC31CRCLNVC32
CKLMGEC33
Heart:
GGGVFWQ34HGRVRPH35
VVLVTSS36CLHRGNSC37
CRSWNKADNRSC38
Gut:
YAGFFLV39RSGARSS40
CVESTVA41SRRQPLS42
SKVWLLL43QVRRVPE44
YSGKWGW45MVQSVG46
LRAVGRA47MSPQLAT48
GAVLPGE49WIEEAER50
LVSEQLR51RGDRPPY52
VRRGSPQ53RVRGPER54
GISAVLS55GGRGSWE56
GVSASDW57FRVRGSP58
SRLSGGT59WELVARS60
MRRDEQR61GCRCWA62
LSPPYMW63LCTAMTE64
Integrins:
CRGDC65CRGDCL66
CRGDCA67NGRAHA68
DGRAHA69RCDVVV70
SLIDIP71TIRSVD72
KRGD73RRGD74
RGDL75
RGD-binding
determinants:
CSFGRGDIRNC76CSFGRTDQRIC77
CSFGKGDNRIC78CSFGRNDSRNC79
CSFGRVDDRNC80CSFGRADRRNC81
CSFGRSVDRNC82CSFGKRDMRNC83
CSFGRWDARNC84CSFGRQDVRNC85
CSFGRDDGRNC86
Angiogenic tumor
endothelium:
CDCRGDCFC87CNGRCVSGCAGRC88
Ovary:
EVRSRLS89RVGLVAR90
AVKDYFR91GVRTSIW92
RPVGMRK93RVRLVNL94
FFAAVRS95KLVNSSW96
LCERVWR97FGSQAFV98
WLERPEY99GGDVMWR100
VRARLMS101TLRESGP102
Uterus:
GLSGGRS103SWCEPGWCR104
Prostate:
EVQSAKW105KRVYVLG106
GRLSVQV107WKPASLS108
FAVRVVG109LVRPLEG110
GFYRMLG111EGRPMVY112
GSRSLGA113RVWQGDV114
GDBLLA115FVWLVGS116
GSEPMFR117VSFLEYR118
WHQPL119SMSIARL120
RGRWLAL121QVEEFPC122
LWLSGNW123GPMLSVM124
WTFLERL125VLPGGQW126
REVKES127RTPAAVM128
GEWLGEC129PNPLMPL130
SLWYLGA131YVGGWEL132
Lung:
CGFECVRQCPERC133CTLRDRNC134
CIKGNVNC135CRHESSSC136
CLYIDRRC137CYSLGADC138
CSKLMMTC139CGFELETC140
CNSDVDLC141CVGNLSMC142
CEKKLLYC143CKGQRDFC144
CTFRNASC145CNMGLTRC146
CHEGYLTC147CGTFGARC148
CIGEVEVC149CRISAHPC150
CLRPYLNC151CSYPKILC152
CMELSKQG153CSEPSGTC154
CGNETLRC155CTLSNRFC156
CMGSEYWC157CLFSDENC158
CAHQHIQC159CKGQGDWC160
CAQNMLCC161CWRGDRKIC162
CLAKENVVC163CIFREANVC164
CRTHGYQGC165CERVVGSSC166
CKTNHMESC167CYEEKSQSC168
CKDSAMTIC169CTRSTNTGC170
CMSWDAVSC171CKWSRLHSC172
CMSPQRSDC173CLHSPRSKC174
CPQDIRRNC175CLYTKEQRC176
CQTRNFAQC177CTGHLSTDC178
CQDLNIMQC179TRRTNNPLT180
CGYIDPNRISQC181CTVNEAYKTRMC182
CRLRSYGTLSLC183CAGTCATGCNGVC184
CADYDLALGLMC185CPKARPAPQYKC186
CSSHQGGFQHGC187CQETRTEGRKKC188
CRPWHNQAHTEC189CSFGTHDTEPHC190
CSEAASRMIGVC191CWEEHPSIKWWC192
CWDADQIEGIKC193CVDSQSMKGLVC194
CRLQTMGQGQSC197CRPAQRDAGTSC196
CGGRDRGTYGPC199GGEVASNERIQC198
CNSKSSAELEKC201CVLNFKNQARDC200
CRGKPLANFEDC203CEGHSMRGYGLC202
CRDRGDRMKSLC205CDNTCTYGVDDC204
CSAHSQEMNVNC207CGAACGVGCRGRC206
CGFECVRQCPERC209CLVGCRLSCGGEC208
CRSGCVEGCGGRC211CIARCGGACGRHC210
CGGECGWECEVSC213CGVGCPGLCGGAC212
CKWLCLLLCAVAC215CSEGCGPVCWPEC214
CGAACGVGCGGRC217CSGSCRRGCGIDC216
CGASCALGCRAYC219CDTSCENNCQGPC218
CSRQCRGACGQPC221CYWWCDGVCALQC220
CAGGGAVRCGGTC223CGGACGGVCTGGC222
CGRPCVGECRMGC225CLVGCEVGCSPAC224
CPRTCGAACASPC227CRGDCGIGCRRLC226
CCFTNFDCYLGC
Skin:
CYADCEGTCGMVC228CWNICPGGCRALC229
GPGCEEECQPAC230CKGTCVLGCSEEC231
CSTLCGLRCMGTC232CMPRCGVNCKWAC233
CVGACDLKCTGGC234CVALCREACGEGC235
CSSGCSKNCLEMC236CGRPCRGGCAASC237
CQGGCGVSCPIFC238CAVRCDGSCVPEC239
CGFGCSGSCQMQC240CRVVCADGCRFIC241
CTMGCTAGCAFAC242CEGKCGLTCECTC243
CNQGCSGSCDVMC244CASGCSESCYVGC245
CGGGCQWGCAGEC246CSVRCKSVCIGLC247
CPSNCVALCTSGC248CVEGCSSGCGPGC249
CRVVCADGCRLIC250CSTLCGLRCMGTC251
CFTFCEYHCQLTC252
Retina:
CRRIWYAVC253CSAYTTSPC254
CSCFRDVCC255CTDKSWPC256
CTDNRVGS257CTIADFPC258
CTSDISWWDYKC259CTVDNELC260
CVGDCIGSCWMFC261CVKFTYDC262
CVSGHLNC263CYGESQQMC264
CYTGETWTC265CAVSIPRC266
CDCRGDCFC267CDSLCGGACAARC268
CERSQSKGVHHC269CFKSTLLC270
CFWHNRAC271CGDVCPSECPGWC272
CGEFKVGC273CGLDCLGDCSGAC274
CGPGYQAQCSLRC275CGSHCGQLCKSLC276
CHMGCVSPCAYVC277CILSYDNPC278
CISRPYFC279CKERLEYTRGVC280
CKERPSNGLSAC281CKPFRTEC282
CKSGCGVACRHMC283CLKPGGQEC284
CMDSQSSC285CMNILSGC286
CNIPVTTPIFGC287CNQRTNRESGNC288
CNRKNSNEQRAC289CNRMEMPC290
CQIRPIDKC291CAIDIGGAC292
CGRFDTAPQRGC293CKRANRLSC294
CLLNYTYC295CLNGLVSMC296
CMSLGNNC297CNRNRMTPC298
CQASASDHC299CQLINSSPC300
CQRVNSVENASC301CRKEHYPC302
CRRHMERC303CSGRPFKYC304
CTHLVTLC305CTSSPAYNC306
CVTSNLRVC307CWDSGSHIC308
CERSHGRLC309CGNLLTRRC310
CINCLSQC311CLRHDFYVC312
CNSRSENC313CRYKGPSC314
CSHHDTNC315CSRWYTTC316
CYAGSPLC317CQTTSWNC318
CQWSMNVC319CRARIRAEDISC320
CRDVVSVIC321CRREYSAC322
Pancreas:
EICQLGSCT323WRCEGFNCQ324
RKCLRPDCG325SWCEPGWCR326
LACFVTGCL327GLCNGATCM328
DMCWLIGCG329SGCRTMVCV330
QRCPRSFCL331LSCAPVICG332
RECTNEICY333NECLMISCR334
SCVFCDWLS335WACEELSCF336
QNCPVTRCV337CATLTNDEC338
CDNREMSC339CFMDHSNC340
CGEYGREC341CHMKRDRTC342
CKKRLLNVC343CLDYHPKC344
CMTGRVTC345CNKIVRRC346
CPDLLVAC347CSDTQSIGC348
CSKAYDLAC349CSKKGPSYC350
CTLKHTAMC351CTQHIANC352
CTTEIDYC353CVGRSGELC354
Liver:
ARRGWTL355SRRFVGG356
QLTGGCL357ALERRSL358
KAYFRWR359RWLAWTV360
VGSFIYS361LSLLGIA362
LSTVLWF363SLAMRDS364
GRSSLAC365SELLGDA366
CGGAGAR367WRQNMPL368
DFLRCRV369QAGLRCH370
RALYDAL371WVSVLGF372
GMAVSSW373SWFFLVA374
WQSVVRV375VKSVCRT376
CGNGHSC377AEMEGRD378
SLRPDNG379PAMGLIR380
Lymph Node:
WGCKLRFCS381MECIKYSCL382
GICATVKCS383PRCQLWACT384
TTCMSQLCL385SHCPMASLC386
GCVRRLLCN387TSCRLFSCA388
KYCTPVECL389RGCNGSRCS390
MCPQRNCL391PECEGVSCI392
AGCSVTVCG393IPCYWESCR394
GSCSMFPCS395QDCVKRPCV396
SECAYRACS397WSCARPLCG398
SLCGSDGCR399RLCPSSPCT400
MRCQFSGCT401RYCYPDGCL402
STCGNWTCR403LPCTGASCP404
CSCTGQLCR405LECRRWRCD406
GLCQIDECR407TACKVAACH408
DRCLDIWCL409XXXQGSPCL410
PLCMATRCA411RDCSHRSCE412
NPCLRAACI413PTCAYGWCA414
LECVANLCT415RKCGEEVCT416
EPCTWNACL417LVCPGTACV418
LYCLDASCL419ERCPMAKCY420
LVCQGSPCL421QQCQDPYCL422
DXCXDIWCL423QPCRSMVCA424
KTCVGVRV425WSCHEFNCR426
LTCWDWSCR427SLCRLSTCS428
KTCAGSSCI429VICTGRQCG430
NPCFGLLV431SLCTAFNCH432
RTCTPSRCM433QSCLWRICI434
QYCWSKGCR435LGCFPSWCG436
VTCSSEWCL437RLCSWGGCA438
STCISVHCS439EVCLVLSCQ440
IACDGYLCG441RDCVKNLCR442
XGCYQKRCT443LGCFXSWCG444
IRCWGGRCS445IPCSLLGCA446
AGCVQSQCY447PRCWERVCS448
KACFGADCX449TLCPLVACE450
SACWLSNCA451SECYTGSCP452
GLCQEHRCW453VECGFSAVF454
EDCREWGCR455HWCRLLACR456
Adrenal Gland:
WGCKLRFCS457MECIKYSCL458
GICATVKCS459PRCQLWACT460
TTCMSQLCL461SHCPMASLC462
GCVRRLLCN463TSCRLFSCA464
KYCTPVECL465RGCNGSRCS466
MCPQRNCL467PECEGVSCI468
AGCSVTVCG469IPCYWESCR470
GSCSMFPCS471QDCVKRPCV472
SECAYRACS473WSCARPLCG474
SLCGSDGCR475RLCPSSPCT476
MRCQFSGCT477RYCYPDGCL478
STCGNWTCR479LPCTGASCP480
CSCTGQLCR481LECRRWRCD482
GLCQIDECR483TACKVAACH484
DRCLDIWCL485XXXQGSPCL486
PLCMATRCA487RDCSHRSCE488
NPCLRAACI489PTCAYGWCA490
LECVANLCT491RKCGEEVCT492
EPCTWNACL493LVCPGTACV494
LYCLDASCL495ERCPMAKCY496
LVCQGSPCL497QQCQDPYCL498
DXCXDIWCL499QPCRSMVCA500
KTCVGVRV501WSCHEFNCR502
LTCWDWSCR503SLCRLSTCS504
KTCAGSSCI505VICTGRQCG506
NPCFGLLV507SLCTAFNCH508
RTCTPSRCM509QSCLWRICI510
QYCWSKGCR511LGCFPSWCG512
VTCSSEWCL513RLCSWGGCA514
STCISVHCS515EVCLVLSCQ516
IACDGYLCG517RDCVKNLCR518
XGCYQKRCT519LGCFXSWCG520
IRCWGGRCS521IPCSLLGCA522
AGCVQSQCY523PRCWERVCS524
KACGGADCX525TLCPLVACE526
SACWLSNCA527SECYTGSCP528
GLCQEHRCW529VECGFSAVF530
EDCREWGCR531HWCRLLACR532
LMLPRAD533
TABLE 2
CGRECPRLCQSSCSEQ ID NO: 534CGEACGGQCALPCSEQ ID NO: 535PSCAYMCITSEQ ID NO: 536
SKVLYYNWESEQ ID NO: 537CERACRNLCREGCSEQ ID NO: 538CKVCNGRCCGSEQ ID NO: 539
CPTCNGRCVRSEQ ID NO: 540CRNCNGRCEGSEQ ID NO: 541CTECNGRCQLSEQ ID NO: 542
CAVCNGRCGFSEQ ID NO: 543CWGCNGRCRMSEQ ID NO: 544CVPCNGRCHESEQ ID NO: 545
CVQCNGRCALSEQ ID NO: 546CGRCNGRCLLSEQ ID NO: 547CVWCNGRCGLSEQ ID NO: 548
CEGVNGRRLRSEQ ID NO: 549CGSLVRCSEQ ID NO: 550SKGLRHRSEQ ID NO: 551
KMGPKVWSEQ ID NO: 552NPRWFWDSEQ ID NO: 553SGWCYRCSEQ ID NO: 554
CWSGVDCSEQ ID NO: 555IVADYQRSEQ ID NO: 556LSMFTRPSEQ ID NO: 557
CVMVRDGDCSEQ ID NO: 558CGVGSSCSEQ ID NO: 559CGEGHPCSEQ ID NO: 560
CPEHRSLVCSEQ ID NO: 561CWRKFYCSEQ ID NO: 562CPRGSRCSEQ ID NO: 563
CAQLLQVSCSEQ ID NO: 564CTDYVRCSEQ ID NO: 565TDCTPSRCTSEQ ID NO: 566
CTAMRNTDCSEQ ID NO: 567VTCRSLMCQSEQ ID NO: 568CISLDRSCSEQ ID NO: 569
CYLVNVDCSEQ ID NO: 570RHCFSQWCSSEQ ID NO: 571EACEMAGCLSEQ ID NO: 572
QWCSRRWCTSEQ ID NO: 573NACESAICGSEQ ID NO: 574EPCEGKKCLSEQ ID NO: 575
AGCINGLCGSEQ ID NO: 576KGCGTRQCWSEQ ID NO: 577KRCSSSLCASEQ ID NO: 578
LDCLSELCSSEQ ID NO: 579IYCPGQECESEQ ID NO: 580EDCTSRFCSSEQ ID NO: 581
RWCREKSCWSEQ ID NO: 582CNKTDGDEGVTCSEQ ID NO: 583CPLCNGRCALSEQ ID NO: 584
CEQCNGRCGQSEQ ID NO: 585CVTCNGRCRVSEQ ID NO: 586CETCNGRCVGSEQ ID NO: 587
CSCCNGRCGDSEQ ID NO: 588CKSCNGRCLASEQ ID NO: 589CRTCNGRCQVSEQ ID NO: 590
CASNNGRVVLSEQ ID NO: 591CSKCNGRCGHSEQ ID NO: 592CGECNGRCVESEQ ID NO: 593
CEVCNGRCALSEQ ID NO: 594HHTRFVSSEQ ID NO: 595WRVLAAFSEQ ID NO: 596
SPGSWTWSEQ ID NO: 597IKARASPSEQ ID NO: 598LWAEMTGSEQ ID NO: 599
SKSSGVSSEQ ID NO: 600VVDRFPDSEQ ID NO: 601IMYPGWLSEQ ID NO: 602
CQLAAVCSEQ ID NO: 603CGLSDSCSEQ ID NO: 604CELSLISKCSEQ ID NO: 605
CYVELHCSEQ ID NO: 606CYSYFLACSEQ ID NO: 607CDDSWKCSEQ ID NO: 608
CKALSQACSEQ ID NO: 609VPCRFKQCWSEQ ID NO: 610CMEMGVKCSEQ ID NO: 611
CGTRVDHCSEQ ID NO: 612CYLGVSNCSEQ ID NO: 613LVCLPPSCESEQ ID NO: 614
ISCAVDACLSEQ ID NO: 615RSCIKHQCPSEQ ID NO: 616GICKDLWCQSEQ ID NO: 617
NRCRGVSCTSEQ ID NO: 618FGCVMASCRSEQ ID NO: 619DTCRALRCNSEQ ID NO: 620
YRCIARECESEQ ID NO: 621QACPMLLCMSEQ ID NO: 622HTCLVALCASEQ ID NO: 623
RKCEVPGCQSEQ ID NO: 624EICVDGLCVSEQ ID NO: 625RPCGDQACESEQ ID NO: 626
CEMCNGRCMGSEQ ID NO: 627CGVCNGRCGLSEQ ID NO: 628CVLCNGRCWSSEQ ID NO: 629
CRTCNGRCLESEQ ID NO: 630CRDLNGRKVMSEQ ID NO: 631CPLCNGRCARSEQ ID NO: 632
CQSCNGRCVRSEQ ID NO: 633CRCCNGRCSPSEQ ID NO: 634CWLCNGRCGRSEQ ID NO: 635
CIRCNGRCSVSEQ ID NO: 636CLSCNGRCPSSEQ ID NO: 637GRSQMQISEQ ID NO: 638
VASVSVASEQ ID NO: 639IFSGSRESEQ ID NO: 640GRWYKWASEQ ID NO: 641
ALVGLMRSEQ ID NO: 642DTLRLRISEQ ID NO: 643VWRTGHLSEQ ID NO: 644
GLPVKWSSEQ ID NO: 645CVRIRPCSEQ ID NO: 646CVSGPRCSEQ ID NO: 647
CYTADPCSEQ ID NO: 648CLVVHEAACSEQ ID NO: 649CFWPNRCSEQ ID NO: 650
CRLGIACSEQ ID NO: 651CYPADPCSEQ ID NO: 652CGETMRCSEQ ID NO: 653
SWCQFEKCLSEQ ID NO: 654CRESLKNCSEQ ID NO: 655CNNVGSYCSEQ ID NO: 656
CAMVSMEDSEQ ID NO: 657CIRSAVSCSEQ ID NO: 658FYCPGVGCRSEQ ID NO: 659
PRCESQLCPSEQ ID NO: 660MFCRMRSCDSEQ ID NO: 661APCGLLACISEQ ID NO: 662
ADCRQKPCLSEQ ID NO: 663RSCAEPWCYSEQ ID NO: 664GRCVDGGCTSEQ ID NO: 665
ICLLAHCASEQ ID NO: 666AGCRVESCSEQ ID NO: 667RLCSLYGCVSEQ ID NO: 668
LECVVDSCRSEQ ID NO: 669FRCLERVCTSEQ ID NO: 670CNGRCVSGCAGRCSEQ ID NO: 671
IWSGYGVYWSEQ ID NO: 672WESLYFPRESEQ ID NO: 673CGLMCQGACFDVCSEQ ID NO: 674
CPRGCLAVCVSQCSEQ ID NO: 675RLCRIVVIRVCRSEQ ID NO: 676
YVPLPNVPQPGRRPFPTFPGQGPFNPKIKWPQGYSEQ ID NO: 677
VFIDILDKVENAIHNAAQVGIGFAKPFEKHLINPKSEQ ID NO: 678
GNNRPVYIPQPRPPHPRISEQ ID NO: 679
GNNRPVYIPQPRPPHPRLSEQ ID NO: 680
GNNRPIYIPQPRPPHPRLSEQ ID NO: 681
RFRPPIRRPPIRPPFYPPFRPPIRPPIFPPIRPPFRPPLRFPSEQ ID NO: 682
RRIRPRPPRLPRPRPRPLPFPRPGPRPIPRPLPFPRPGPRPIPRLPSEQ ID NO: 683
LPFFRPGPRPIPRP
PRPIPRPLPFFRPGPRPIPRSEQ ID NO: 684
WNPFKELERAGQRVRDAVISAAPAVATVGQAALARGSEQ ID NO: 685
WNPFKELERAGQRVRDAIISAGPAVATVGQAAAIASEQ ID NO: 686
WNPFKELERAGQRVRDAIISAAPAVATVGQAAAIARGSEQ ID NO: 687
WNPFKELERAGQRVRDAVISAAPAVATVGQAAAIARGGSEQ ID NO: 688
GIGALSAKGALKGLAKGLAZHFANSEQ ID NO: 689
GIGASILSAGKSALKGLAKGLAEHFANSEQ ID NO: 690
GIGSAILSAGKSALKGLAKGLAEHFANSEQ ID NO: 691
IKITTMLAKLGKVLAHVSEQ ID NO: 692
SKITDILAKLGKVLAIIVSEQ ID NO: 693
RPDFCLEPPYTGPCKARIISEQ ID NO: 694
RYFYNAKAGLCQTFVYGSEQ ID NO: 695
GCRAKRINNFKSAEDCMRTCGGASEQ ID NO: 696
FLPLLAGLAANFLPKIFCKITRKCSEQ ID NO: 697
GIMDTLKNLAKTAGKGALQSLLNKASCKLSGQCSEQ ID NO: 698
KWKLFKKIEKVGQNIRDGIIKAGPAVAVVGQATQIAKSEQ ID NO: 699
KWKVFKIKIEKMGRNIRNGIVKAGPAIAVLGEAKALSEQ ID NO: 700
GWILKKLGKRIERIGQHTRDATIQGLGIAQQAANVAATARGSEQ ID NO: 701
WNPFKELEKVGQRVRDAVISAGPAVATVAQATALAKSEQ ID NO: 702
SWLSKTAKKLENSAKKRISEGIAIAIQGGPRSEQ ID NO: 703
ZFTNVSCTTSKECWSVCQRLHNTSRGKCMNKKCRCYSSEQ ID NO: 704
FLPLILRKIVTALSEQ ID NO: 705
LRDLVCYCRSRGCKGRERMNGTCRKGHLLYTLCCRSEQ ID NO: 706
LRDLVCYCRTRGCKRRERMNGTCRKGHLMYTLCCRSEQ ID NO: 707
VVCACRRALCLPRERRAGFCRIRGRIHTPLCCRRSEQ ID NO: 708
VVCACRRALCLPLERRAGFCRIRGRIHPLCCRRSEQ ID NO: 709
RRCICTTRTCRFPYRRLGTCIFQNRVYTFCCSEQ ID NO: 710
RRCICTTRTCRFPYRRLGTCLFQNRVYTFCCSEQ ID NO: 711
ACYCRIPACIAGERRYGTCIYQGRLWAFCCSEQ ID NO: 712
CYCRIPACIAGERRYGTCIYQGRLWAFCCSEQ ID NO: 713
VVCACRRALCLPRERRAGFCRIRGRIHPLCCRRSEQ ID NO: 714
VVCACRRALCLPLERRAGFCRIRGRIHPLCCRRSEQ ID NO: 715
VTCYCRRTRCGFRERLSGACGYRGRIYRLCCRSEQ ID NO: 716
VTCYCRSTRCGFRERLSGACGYRGRIYRLCCRSEQ ID NO: 717
DFASCHTNGGICLPNRCPGHMIQIGICFRPRVKCCRSWSEQ ID NO: 718
VRNHVTCRINRGFCVPIRCPGRTRQIGTCFGPRIKCCRSWSEQ ID NO: 719
NPVSCVRNKGICVPIRCPGSMKQIGTCVGRAVKCCRKKSEQ ID NO: 720
ATCDLLSGTGINHSACAAHCLLRGNRGGYCNGKAVCVCRNSEQ ID NO: 721
GFGCPLDQMQCHRHCQTITGRSGGYCSGPLKLTCTCYRSEQ ID NO: 722
GFGCPLNQGACHRHCRSIRRRGGYCAGFFKQTCTCYRNSEQ ID NO: 723
ALWKTMLKKLGTMALHAGKAALGAADTISQTQSEQ ID NO: 724
GKPRPYSPRPTSHPRPIRVSEQ ID NO: 725
GIFSKLGRKKIKNLLISGLKNVGKEVGMDVVRTGIDIAGCKIKGECSEQ ID NO: 726
ILPWKWPWWPWRRSEQ ID NO: 727
FKCRRWQWRMKKLGAPSITCVRRAPSEQ ID NO: 728
ITSISLCTPGCKTGALMGCNMKTATCHCSIHVSKSEQ ID NO: 729
TAGPAIRASVKQCQKTLKATRLFTVSCKGKNGCKSEQ ID NO: 730
MSKFDDFDLDVVKVSKQDSKITPQWKSESLCTPGCVTGALQTCFLQSEQ ID NO: 731
TLTCNCKISK
KYYGNGVHCTKSGCSVNSEQ ID NO: 732
WGEAFSAGVHRLANGGNGFWSEQ ID NO: 733
GIGKFLHSAGKFGKAFVGEIMKSSEQ ID NO: 734
GIGKFLHSAKKFGKAFVGEIMNSSEQ ID NO: 735
GMASKAGAIAGKIAKVALKALSEQ ID NO: 736
GVLSNVIGYLKKLGTGALNAVLKGSEQ ID NO: 737
GWASKIGQTLGKIAKVGLKELIQPKSEQ ID NO: 738
INLKALAALAKKILSEQ ID NO: 739
GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQSEQ ID NO: 740
ATCDLLSGTGINHSACAAHCLLRGNRGGYCNGKGVCVCRNSEQ ID NO: 741
ATCDLLSGTGINHSACAAHCLLRGNRGGYCNRKGVCVRNSEQ ID NO: 742
RRWCFRVCYRGFCYRKCRSEQ ID NO: 743
RRWCFRVCYKGFCYRKCRSEQ ID NO: 744
RGGRLCYCRRRFCVCVGRSEQ ID NO: 745
RGGRLCYCRRRFCICVSEQ ID NO: 746
RGGGLCYCRRRFCVCVGRSEQ ID NO: 747
VTCDLLSFKGQVNDSACAANCLSLGKAGGHCEKGVCICRKTSFKDLSEQ ID NO: 748
WDKYF
GWLKKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQGLGIAQQAANVAATARSEQ ID NO: 749
GWLKKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQVIGVAQQAANVAATARSEQ ID NO: 750
SDEKASPDKHHRFSLSRYAKLANRLANPKLLETFLSKWIGDRGNRSVSEQ ID NO: 751
KWCFRVCYRGICYRRCRSEQ ID NO: 752
RWCFRVCYRGICYRKCRSEQ ID NO: 753
KSCCKDTLARNCYNTCRFAGGSRPVCAGACRCKIIGPKCPSDYPKSEQ ID NO: 754
GGKPDLRPCIIPPCHYIPRPKPRSEQ ID NO: 755
VKDGYIVDDVNCTYFCGRNAYCNEECTKLKGESGYCQWASPYGNACSEQ ID NO: 756
YCKLPDHVRTKGPGRCH
1 of 13 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

25 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K9/107
  • A61K9/51
  • A61K38/16
  • A61K38/04
  • A61K51/12
  • A61K51/08
  • A61K49/18
  • A61K38/08
  • A61K51/04
  • A61K49/00
  • A61K49/14
  • A61K51/00
  • A61M36/14
  • A61K47/48
USPC · US Patent Classification
424/1.69530/324530/300530/329530/330530/327530/328424/1.11530/326530/325424/1.65

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom2005200620072008200920102011201220132014USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementResponse after non-finalNon-final rejectionExaminer-initiated interview
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
8.9 y
3,239 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
after a restriction
Responses
4
1 RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
D L Jones
art unit 1618 · TC 1600
Citations: 21 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock