USPatent applicationPatented

Method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system

Granted 2 Nov 2010 · 1 office action

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types is disclosed. The method includes receiving at least one pilot signal from a transmitting end, wherein the pilot signal is represented by either Type 0 or Type 1, determining which of Type 0 or Type 1 is represented in the received pilot signal, and activating the space-time decoder for performing space-time decoding, if the pilot signal is Type 1.

Description

7 parts
›This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional…

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/722,006, filed on Sep. 28, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method of identifying encoded signals, and more particularly, to a method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system.

2. Discussion of the Related Art

A Broadcast Multicast Service (BCMCS) provides the ability to transmit the same information stream to multiple users simultaneously. More specifically, the BCMCS is intended to provide flexible and efficient mechanism to send common or same information to multiple users. The motivation for this service is to achieve the most efficient use of air interface and network resources when sending the same information to multiple users. The type of information transmitted can be any type of data (e.g., text, multimedia, streaming media). The BCMCS is delivered via the most efficient transmission technique based on the density of the BCMCS users, information (media type) being transmitted, and available wireless resources.

Transmission territory for each BCMCS program can be independently defined. Here, the BCMCS program refers to a logical content transmitted using the BCMCS capabilities. Moreover, the BCMCS program is composed of one or more internet protocol flows. In operation, the programs can be transmitted in time sequence on a given channel. The BCMCS programs can be transmitted to all or selected regions of the network. These regions constitute the transmission territory which refers to an area of wireless network coverage where transmission of a BCMCS program can occur. The transmission territory can be defined by a set of cells/sectors that can transmit a BCMCS program. In addition, the BCMCS programs can be received by all users or can be restricted to a subset of users via encryption.

In the BCMCS, retransmission and acknowledgement are not required since the type of transmission is “one way” and/or “one to many.”

The BCMCS subscription is normally associated with the program (e.g., ABC, TNT, ESPN), not the content (media type such as music, video, etc.). That is, by selecting the program, the user selects the type of content the user wishes to receive.

In addition, a receiver in the BCMCS over cellular networks employing a space-time coding (STC) scheme. More specifically, the STC scheme is employed to improve the reliability of data transmission in wireless communication systems using multiple transmit antennas. STCs rely on transmitting multiple, redundant copies of a data stream to the receiver in the hope that at least some of them may survive the physical path between transmission and reception in a good enough state to allow reliable decoding.

As for the receiver, it is important for the receiver to have the capability to properly and efficiently decode the received signals and determine whether or not the system is transmitting a space-time encoded signal. To this end, there may be need for the network to transmit extra information via the upper layer broadcast message indicating that space-time coding is being used. The problem with is that extra information incurs overhead. In addition, the use of space-time coding at the transmitter implies the need for a special space-time decoder with increased complexity relative to the receiver for the system without space-time coding turned on (i.e., regular transmission). However, the problem with this is that a more complex space-time decoder is needed.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system that substantially obviates one or more problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art.

An object of the present invention is to provide a method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of selecting a decoder type in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types.

Additional advantages, objects, and features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows and in part will become apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned from practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

To achieve these objects and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, a method of identifying a space-time encoded signal in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types is disclosed. The method includes receiving at least one pilot signal from a transmitting end, wherein the pilot signal is represented by either Type 0 or Type 1, determining which of Type 0 or Type 1 is represented in the received pilot signal, and activating the space-time decoder for performing space-time decoding, if the pilot signal is Type 1.

In another aspect of the present invention, a method of method of selecting a decoder type in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types is disclosed. The method includes receiving at least two pilot signals from a transmitting end, wherein each pilot signal is represented by various pilot signal types, determining the pilot signal type of each received pilot signal, decoding a portion of each received pilot signal using at least two decoders, each decoder corresponding to each pilot signal type, and determining the decoder type for a selected pilot signal, the pilot signal is selected based on the decoded portion of the pilot signal having a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

In a further aspect of the present invention, a method of selecting a decoder type in a wireless communication system having at least two different decoder types is disclosed. The method includes receiving at least two pilot signals from a transmitting end, decoding a portion of each received pilot signal using a default decoder, and determining the decoder type based on a signal type of the decoded portion of the signal.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description of the present invention are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principle of the invention. In the drawings;

FIG. 1 illustrates a plurality of modules that are respectively one hop apart;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a relay station (RS) in a multi-hop system;

FIG. 3 illustrates a scheme for a relayed BCMCS according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a scheme for a relayed BCMCS according to another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an identification of a space-time encoded signal according to one embodiment.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

Currently, the BCMCS over cellular networks are based on single-hop networks. The single hop network refers to a network where all entities/modules are a maximum of one hop apart. FIG. 1 illustrates a plurality of modules that are respectively one hop apart. In FIG. 1 , two MSs and a base terminal station (BTS) are one hop apart respectively.

To improve service throughout the coverage area and capacity, multiple hops (two or more hops) can be used. More specifically, two or more hops through relaying can be employed to provide more consistent service and improved capacity. To this end, a relay station (RS) can be introduced in the network represented by the usual BTS and MS.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a RS in a multi-hop system. As shown in FIG. 2 , the RS is placed between the BTS and the MS. The function of the RS is to ‘repeat’ the BTS signal in a trivial or a smart manner so as to extend the BCMCS coverage. According to the conventional system, the MSs positioned away from the BTS (e.g., near the cell border) often experience failed signal due to weakened signal strength or interference due to signals from neighboring cells/sectors. With the extended BCMCS coverage, however, the MS's, that would otherwise unable to receive strong enough signal, can demodulate and decode the BCMCS signal.

As mentioned above, the function of the RS can be accomplished in a trivial or smart manner, for example. The trivial manner refers to relaying the signal through simple signal repetition. Alternatively, the smart manner refers to employing space-time coding to achieve transmit diversity or incremental redundancy (IR).

Here, the RS can be equipped with multiple antennas to achieve transmit diversity. A multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) can provide transmit diversity to increase efficiency of wireless resources. The use of multiple antennas provides the RS and other terminals (e.g., mobile station) to achieve diversity gain without increase in broadband. For example space-time code (STC) can be used to increase reliability of communication links, spatial multiplexing (SM) can be used to increase transmission capacity, or a full diversity full rate space time code (FDFR-STC) can be used to achieve full diversity.

FIG. 3 illustrates a scheme for a relayed BCMCS according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 3 , a space-time coding is introduced in a multi-hop system having two frequency carriers (i.e., f 1 and f 2 ) and one RS.

The BTS broadcasts BCMCS packets (e.g., A, B, C, D) in sequence on a frequency (i.e., f 1 ). The RS then receives the broadcasted BCMCS packets and decodes them before transmitting a ‘relayed signal’ to the MS. That is, for example, after the RS receives packet A broadcasted from the BTS on f 1 and decodes packet A, the RS can then transmit packet A 1 ′ and packet A 2 ′ (also referred to as ‘relayed signals’) to the MS using a different frequency (i.e., f 2 ). The relayed signals can be based on simple repetition or space-time encoding, for example. For simple repetition, packet A would simply relay the original signal, thus packet A=packet A 1 ′=packet A 2 ′. Alternatively, space-time coding can be used to exploit transmit diversity.

For transmit diversity, in FIG. 3 , the BCMCS packets transmitted to the MS by the RS are divided into two types—Type 1 and Type 2. Here, the RS can be divided into two types (i.e., Type 1 and Type 2) based on the RS sharing one frequency and/or based on the RS having two antennas. However, the RS is not limited to having two antennas but can have more than two antennas. As discussed above, the RS decodes the BTS′ transmission of packet A and transmits the ‘relayed signals’ A 1 ′ and A 2 ′ for RS of Type 1 and RS of Type 2, respectively. For example, the RS Type 1 transmits the same signal or repeated packet (e.g., packet A′) such that packet A=packet A 1 ′. At the same time, the RS Type 2 transmits a space-time encoded version, packet A 2 ′, instead to provide transmit diversity. Here, the space-time code can be based on an Alamouti scheme, for example (for details of Alamouti scheme, see Alamouti, S. M. A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications , IEEE Journal on Select Areas in Communications, Vol. 16, No. 8, (October 1998), pp. 1451-1458). Since packet A 1 ′ and packet A 2 ′ are sent on the same frequency (i.e., f 2 ) at the same transmission time slot, the relayed signal for Type 1 and Type 2 should be in a different format. That is, if Type 1 is a simple repetition of the original packet, then Type 2 is space-time encoded, and vice versa.

FIG. 4 illustrates a scheme for a relayed BCMCS according another embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 4 , a single frequency carrier having a time-division multiplexing (TDM) is applied in a multi-hop system.

Since the BTS and the MS share the same spectrum in a time division multiplexing (TDM) fashion, the transmission time for a single packet is doubled. As described above, the BTS broadcasts the original signal (i.e., packet A) during the first transmission time slot. The RS then receives and decodes the BTS′ transmission of packet A. Thereafter, the RS transmits a ‘relayed signal’ A 2 ′ during the subsequent transmission time slot. Here, packet A 2 ′ can be simple repetition of packet A or can be space-time encoded. At the same transmission time slot, the BTS retransmits packet A now in form of packet A 1 ′. Here, packet A 1 ′ can be simple repetition of packet A, space-time encoded packet A, or different parity bit packet A. In short, there are a number of options for designing the relayed signal A 2 ′ and the BTS retransmitted signal A 1 ′. For example, both packet A 1 ′ and packet A 2 ′ can be simple repetition where packet A 1 ′=packet A 2 ′=packet A. Alternatively, packet A 1 ′ and packet A 2 ′ can be space-time encoded.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3

Similar arrangement can be applied to subsequent BTS transmissions (e.g., packet B and packets B 1 ′/B 2 ′).

As described above, the transmitting end can send the signals in various forms, including space-time encoded signals. Here, the transmitting end can be a BTS or a RS. It is important that these transmitted signals are successfully received and decoded by the receiver.

In order to resolve the problems associated with the current design of the receiver which can incur unwanted overhead and/or require a special complex space-time decoder, as described above, the receiver should be designed so that it can determine whether or not the system is transmitting a space-time encoded signal. More detailed information regarding a space-time decoder can be found in “Gesbert, David, From Theory to Practice: An Overview of MIMO Space - Time Coded Wireless System's , IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 21, No. 3, (April 2003), pp. 281-302.”

In the system which employs Alamouti space-time codes, the pilot tones are space-time coded if space-time coding is activated. Similarly, the converse is true if space-time coding is not activated. In the present invention, assume that Type 0 sectors transmit the original pilot signal while Type 1 sectors transmit a space-time encoded pilot signal.

As an embodiment of the present invention, the determination as to whether the system is transmitting a space-time encoded signal can be made possible by having the MS process the pilot signals or pilot tones in a smart manner (see, for example, FIG. 5 ). That is, since the pilot signals include different signal patterns, the MS can recognize different patterns based on the pilot signal. More specifically, this means that when the pilot signal is space-time encoded, the pilot signals have a certain pattern. Alternatively, when space-time coding is not activated which means that the pilot signal is not space-time encoded, the pilot signals have a different pattern from that of the space-time encoded pilot signal. In essence, this distinction enables the MS to determine whether or not the received pilot signal is space-time encoded, allowing the MS to process the pilot signals smartly.

The MS can process the pilot signal and attempt to detect the Type 1 pilot signal (space-time encoded pilot signal). The detection can be performed by one of many available methods such as a Neyman Pearson method.

If the Type 1 pilot signal is detected, then the MS assumes that the received pilot signal is space-time encoded or put differently, space-time coding has been activated. Further, if the Type 1 pilot signal is detected but the Type 0 pilot signal is not, then the MS decodes using space-timing coding.

Alternatively, if the Type 0 pilot signal is detected but the Type 1 pilot signal is not, then the MS decodes using the regular decoder (e.g., no space-time coding). If both the Type 0 and the Type 1 pilot signals are detected, then a default decoder can be used. Here, the default decoder can be pre-set. However, if neither the Type 0 nor the Type 1 pilot signal is detected, then the space-time decoder can be used.

Alternatively, the MS can process the BCMCS signal by using the regular detector, also referred as a default decoder. If and when the BCMCS reception quality is sufficiently good, the MS can assume that the pilot signal is not space-time encoded and can process the pilot signal in a usual manner in which the pilot signal is decoded as if the pilot signal is not space-time encoded. In other words, the received pilot signal can be processed by the default decoder. Here, the reception quality can be measured using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the two pilots (SNR for Type 1 pilot and SNR for Type 2 pilot), for example. If, however, the BCMCS reception quality is poor or insufficient, the MS can use the space-time decoder. In the event that the space-time decoder performs better than the default decoder, then the MS can assume that the pilot signal is space-time encoded and switch over to the space-time decoder. It is also possible to set the space-time decoder as the default decoder in the present invention.

Alternatively, the MS can decode the BCMCS signal with the default decoder and the space-time decoder. In this case, the MS receives at least two pilot signals and determines the pilot signal type of each pilot signal. For example, the pilot signal type of the pilot signal could be Type 0 (non-space-time encoded) or could be Type 1 (space-time encoded). Based on the determined pilot signal type (e.g., Type 0 or Type 1), the MS uses the decoders corresponding to each pilot signal type to detect a portion of each pilot signal. The detected portions of the pilot signals are then compared, and the pilot signal having better output is selected.

Alternatively, a combination of the above schemes can also be used.

As another embodiment of the present invention, the receiver design can be simplified. If the MS receives a sufficiently strong signal from the system, the MS need not perform space-time decoding which typically requires additional signal processing. Instead, the MS can implement a much simpler receiver.

If the MS is in a sufficiently good channel condition, the MS may not need to perform space-time decoding. More specifically, the MS can receive at least two pilot signals. The MS then detects a portion or about half of each pilot signal using a default decoder. If the portion or half of the pilot signal is successfully detected, then the MS can continue to use the default decoder to decode rest of the pilot signal. When the default decoder is used, it signifies that the pilot signal is not space-time encoded. For example, if the MS receives the Type 0 pilot signal, which signifies absence of space-time encoding, the default decoder is employed.

If, however, the portion or half of the received pilot signal is not successfully decoded, then the MS can switch to or use the space-time decoder to decode the pilot signal. When the space-time decoder is used, it signifies that the pilot signal is space-time encoded. For example, if the MS receives a combined Type 1 and Type 0 pilot signal, which signifies presence of space-time encoding, the space-time decoder is employed.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3

Further, if the MS determines that is cannot detect a Type 1 signal, the MS can decide to demodulate the Type 0 signal as if there were not space-time encoding. Similarly, if the MS does detect the Type 1 signal but cannot detect a Type 0 signal, the MS can decide to demodulate the Type 1 signal as explained above.

It is important to note that the embodiments of above are not limited to space-time coding schemes but can also be applied to other space-time codes. Further, the system, as discussed above, is not limited to the BCMCS system, but also be applied to cellular networks, point-to-point system, and/or any other types of systems that applies transmit diversity.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the inventions. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

1 of 7 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04B17/40
  • H04W88/04
  • H04W84/04
  • H04W76/00
  • H04W72/12
  • H04J3/24
USPC · US Patent Classification
375/349375/265

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.1 y
1,496 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Brenda Pham
art unit 2464 · TC 2400
Citations: 31 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock