USPatent applicationPatented

Magnetic resonance system with suppression of capacitive coupling between an RF source and the subject

Granted 22 May 2007 · no office action yet

Current assignee: Siemens Healthineers Ltd. · originally Siemens AG

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Markus Vester · Examiner: Brij B. Shrivastav · AU 2859 · TC 2800

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A magnetic resonance system has a transmission antenna that excited magnetic resonance signals in an examination subject arranged in an examination volume, a radio-frequency source that is stationary or mobile in the examination volume or in its surroundings and by means of which an electrical field oscillating at the excitation frequency can be generated. A barrier is arranged between the radio-frequency source and the examination volume—the barrier formed of a number of individual resonators that are respectively inherently resonant at the excitation frequency. The examination volume is shielded by the barrier from the electrical field generated by the radio-frequency source. Each individual resonator has two capacitor surfaces of which one faces toward the radio-frequency source and the other faces the examination volume, and they are connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner via a coil. The capacitor surface facing toward the radio-frequency source and/or the capacitor surface facing toward the examination volume are not directly connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention concerns a magnetic resonance system with a transmission antenna and a radio-frequency source having a sheath wave barrier or trep in a cable between the radio-frequency source and the examination volume.

2. Description of the Prior Art

PCT Application WO 03/025608 discloses a magnetic resonance system wherein an examination subject arranged in an examination volume can be excited to magnetic resonance with an excitation frequency by means of a transmission antenna, operated by a radio-frequency source, with the radio-frequency source having stationary or mobile in the examination volume or in its surroundings.

An electrical field oscillating at the excitation frequency is generated by the radio-frequency source.

A barrier is arranged between the radio-frequency source and the examination volume, the barrier being formed of individual resonators that are each naturally resonant at the excitation frequency.

The examination volume is shielded by means of the barrier from the electrical field generated by the radio-frequency source.

The radio-frequency source is fashioned as a cable in this known magnetic resonance system. The barrier essentially represents a further development of a known sheath wave barrier.

The transmission antennas of a magnetic resonance system should generate a magnetic excitation field in an examination subject (generally a person) to cause magnetic resonance excitatism in the examination subject. After the magnetic resonance excitatism it is possible to receive the emitted magnetic resonances by means of suitable reception antennas. The transmission antenna itself can possibly be used for reception.

Eddy currents, which lead to an unwanted heating of the examination subject, are always associated with the generation of the magnetic excitation field. These eddy currents cannot be prevented. Currents having electrical fields that are capacitively coupled into the examination subject and lead to a further heating of the examination subject are also generated in addition to these unavoidable eddy currents. Such capacitive couplings in particular occur at the conductors of the transmission antenna, but can also occur (albeit to a lesser extent) at local receiver coils or at cables insofar as these are located in the effective range of the transmission antenna. All of these elements (transmission antenna, local coil, cable) can thus act as (unwanted) radio-frequency sources whose electrical fields should optimally be kept away from the examination subject.

A direct and (without further measures) intrusive approach is to make the distance of the radio-frequency source from the examination subject optimally large. This leads, for example, either to over-dimensioned transmission antennas in the case of whole-body transmission antennas, or to a reduction of the spatial relationships (which are limited anyway) in the examination volume. An enlarged distance in the reception case also leads to a reduced sensitivity, even for local coils.

It would also be possible to divide the resonance capacitors in the transmission and/or reception antennas (known as “multiple reduction”). This leads, however, to increased capacitor losses and moreover to an additional production expenditure. Furthermore, this solution is not applicable in all cases.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to suppress unwanted capacitive couplings of the radio-frequency source in a magnetic resonance examination subject and, at the same time, to avoid the disadvantages of the prior art. In particular the individual resonators should be fashioned simply and effectively.

This object is achieved by a magnetic resonance system of the aforementioned type wherein each individual resonator has two capacitor surfaces, of which one faces toward the radio-frequency source and the other faces toward the examination volume, and that are connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner via a coil, and wherein the capacitor surfaces facing towards the radio-frequency source and/or the capacitor surfaces facing towards the examination volume are not directly connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner.

This arrangement causes currents in the barrier that compensate the displacement current caused by the radio-frequency source in the examination subject.

As already mentioned, the radio-frequency source is normally the same as the transmission antenna. In individual cases it is also possible that the radio-frequency source is fashioned as a local coil for reception of magnetic resonances excited in the examination subject or as a cable.

The individual resonators alternatively can be insulated from one another or electrically connected with one another. Hybrids are also possible.

The capacitor surfaces are connected with the coils via connection points. The capacitor surfaces advantageously extend essentially in one plane and have extensions extending radially in the plane relative to the connection points. The capacitor surfaces can be star-shaped.

The individual resonators alternatively can be irregularly or regularly distributed. In the latter case, the individual resonators can define, for example, a rectangular or a hexagonal pattern.

A dielectric is normally arranged between the capacitor surfaces. In this case it is possible for the dielectric to function as a carrier or supporting structure for the capacitor surfaces and the coils. Preferably it extends across a number of individual resonators.

Alternatively, essentially only air can be located between the capacitor surfaces of the individual resonators. For example, spacers can be provided in places between the capacitor surfaces or a bearing structure for the individual resonators can be provided as a foam packing sheet.

The radio-frequency source normally also emits an alternating magnetic field. In this case, the coils are oriented such that the alternating magnetic field induces no currents in them. Alternatively, the coils of the individual resonators can be fashioned such that currents induced in the coils by the alternating magnetic field mutually generate compensating induction voltages.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a magnetic resonance system.

FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram representing certain of the items of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 illustrates a barrier in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 4 through 6 show individual resonators in the inventive barrier.

FIG. 7 through 9 show arrangements of individual resonators in the inventive barrier.

FIGS. 10 and 11 show alternative embodiments of the barrier shown in FIG. 2 .

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

As shown in FIG. 1 , a magnetic resonance system has various magnet systems 1 and at least one transmission antenna 2 (here in the form of a whole-body antenna 2 ). The transmission antenna 2 defines an examination volume 3 that is normally essentially cylindrical. An examination subject 5 (normally a person) can be inserted into the examination volume 3 by means of a patient bed 4 . A local coil 6 that is connected with a control and evaluation device 8 via a cable 7 can be arranged on the examination subject 5 .

The transmission antenna (see FIG. 2 ) generates an alternating magnetic field B in the examination volume 3 , this alternating magnetic field exhibiting an excitation frequency (namely the Larmor frequency). When the examination subject 5 is introduced into the examination volume 3 (i.e., is temporarily arranged therein), magnetic resonance signals are excited in the examination subject 5 at the excitation frequency. These excited magnetic resonance signals can be received by the whole-body antenna 2 (in the reception made) and/or by the local coil 6 . The received magnetic resonances are supplied to the control and evaluation device 8 and are evaluated in a typical known manner.

Not only is the desired radio-frequency magnetic field is generated and radiated by the transmission antenna 2 ; but also an electrical field is generated that oscillates with the excitation frequency and is provided with the reference character E in FIG. 2 . The transmission antenna 2 —which is arranged in the surroundings of the examination volume 3 —is thus at the same time also a radio-frequency source by means of which the electrical field E can be generated. This electrical field E would be capacitively coupled into the examination subject 5 if no countermeasures were taken. Shielding the subject 5 from this electrical field E is the object of the present invention.

The inventive magnetic resonance system has a barrier 9 for shielding the electrical field E. The barrier 9 is arranged between the radio-frequency source 2 and the examination volume 3 . The examination volume 3 is shielded from the electrical field E generated by the radio-frequency source 2 by the barrier 9 .

The barrier 9 according to FIGS. 2 and 3 is formed by a number of individual resonators 10 . According to FIGS. 2 and 3 , each individual resonator 10 has two capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 as well as a coil 13 . The capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 is respectively face toward the radio-frequency source 2 and the examination volume 3 . The capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 are connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner via the coil 13 . According to FIGS. 2 and 3 , both the capacitor surface 11 facing toward the radio-frequency source 2 and the capacitor surface 12 facing toward the examination volume 3 are not directly connected with, one another in an electrically-conductive manner.

The capacitance indicated in FIG. 2 between the capacitor surface 11 and the radio-frequency source 2 , the capacitance indicated between the capacitor surface 12 and the examination subject 5 , and the resistance indicated in the examination subject 5 are not physically-present components, but merely illustrate the existing coupling.

The capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 are separated from one another by a barrier thickness d and exhibit an effective area A. They form a plate capacitor with a capacitance C that is determined by the generally known formula

C=∈ 0 ∈ r ·A/d

wherein ∈ 0 is the absolute dielectric constant, ∈ r is the relative dielectric constant of the medium forming the barrier 9 is comprised.

In order to be able to optimally fulfill its shielding function, the barrier 9 should be resonant at the excitation frequency (the Larmor frequency). Each individual resonator 10 therefore should be resonant at the excitation frequency. The coils 13 thus should exhibit an inductance L that satisfies the condition

L= 1/ω 2 C

wherein ω is the excitation frequency multiplied by 2Π.

The individual resonators 10 are completely electrically separated from one another according to FIGS. 2 and 3 . Alternatively, they can be connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner, for example on the sides of the radio-frequency source 2 or of the examination volume 3 .

According to FIG. 3 , which shows the simplest embodiment of the individual resonators 10 , the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 are fashioned as simple rectangular (alternatively, for example, honeycomb-shaped or circular) areas 11 , 12 . Furthermore, the coils 13 exhibit coil axes 15 that are situated essentially perpendicular to the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 . Although this embodiment of the individual resonators 10 is possible and very simple, it is still not optimal with regard to its shielding effect. In the subsequently-described FIG. 4 through 6 , embodiments of individual resonators 10 are shown that are optimized with regard to their effect. The variations subsequently described in connection with the FIG. 4 through 6 can be realized independently of one another and also can be combined with one another insofar as they do not mutually contradict in the individual case.

According to FIG. 4 , the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 are connected with the coils 13 via connection points 16 , 17 . The capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 extend in essentially in one plane precisely they are “surfaces”. Relative to the connection points 16 , 17 , they exhibit extensions 18 that radially extend in the plane, thus away from the connection points 16 , 17 . The extensions 18 are therefore not directly connected with one another in an electrically-conductive manner, but rather are only connected via a core region 19 of the respective contact surface 11 , 12 . Eddy currents that are induced in the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 can be reduced to a minimum via this embodiment of the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 .

The size of the core regions 19 can be very small. In the extreme case, it is possible that the core regions 19 are identical with the connection points 16 , 17 . In this case the contact surfaces 11 , 12 are star-shaped.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

Furthermore, according to FIG. 4 the coil 13 is oriented such that its coil axis 15 is perpendicular to a rotation plane within which the magnetic field B oscillates. It is thereby achieved that no current can be induced in the coil 13 by the radio-frequency source 2 although the radio-frequency source 2 also emits the magnetic field B.

Situations can exist in which the arrangement of the coils 13 shown in FIG. 4 is not possible. For example, the orientation of a cable 7 or of a local coil 6 is not known beforehand in all cases. In spite of the radiation of an alternating magnetic field B by the radio-frequency source 2 , it should also be possible in these cases to exclude an influence of the radio-frequency source 2 on the coils 13 of the individual resonators 10 . This can be achieved via corresponding design of the coils 13 . For this, the coils 13 are fashioned such that currents that are induced in the coils 13 by the alternating magnetic field B generate induction voltages that mutually compensate. In an embodiment of the coils 13 the coils 13 (see FIG. 5 ) are divided into two partial coils (sub-coils) 20 connected anti-parallel to one another. Alternatively, the coils 13 according to FIG. 6 could also be fashioned as toroids 13 .

In principle, the individual resonators 10 can be arranged arbitrarily distributed within the barrier 9 . For example, according to FIG. 7 they can be irregularly distributed. As is shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 , they can also be regularly distributed. FIG. 8 shows individual resonators 10 that define a rectangular pattern. FIG. 9 shows Individual resonators 10 that define a hexagonal pattern.

As can be seen from FIG. 2 , a dielectric 21 is arranged between the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 of the individual resonators 10 . The dielectric 21 extends over a number of individual resonators 10 and is fashioned (corresponding to the representation from FIG. 2 ) as a supporting structure 21 for the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 and the coils 13 . It is also conceivable for essentially only air to be located between the capacitor surfaces 11 , 12 of the individual resonators 10 . For example, it is possible to provide spacers 22 according to FIG. 10 . A supporting structure that is fashioned as a foamed material could also be used corresponding to FIG. 11 , such that the supporting structure 23 itself is essentially composed of air.

The present invention was explained above in connection with a transmission antenna 2 . This represents the most frequent and important application case, but the present invention is not limited to the application in a transmission antenna 2 . It could also be applied in the individual case when the radio-frequency source is identical with the local coil 6 that is fashioned merely for excitation of magnetic resonances excited in the examination subject 5 . It is even possible to provide the cable 7 for the local coil 6 with an inventive barrier 9 . In each of these cases, an effective shielding of the examination volume 3 from a capacitive coupling of electrical fields that are generated by the respective radio-frequency source 2 , 6 , 7 is provided.

Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventor to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of his contribution to the art.

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01V3/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
324/318324/322

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2006Jul 2006Oct 2006Jan 2007Apr 2007Jul 2007USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.2 y
426 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Brij B. Shrivastav
art unit 2859 · TC 2800
Citations: 5 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1Owner 2Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock