USPatent applicationPatented

High output current buffer

Granted 12 Aug 2008 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Semiconductor Components Industries · originally Onsemi

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Steven O. Smith · Examiner: Robert J. Pascal · AU 2817 · TC 2800

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A bipolar high output current buffer is disclosed using a negative feedback current mirror to supply the base drive to an output transistor. Small quiescent currents are used wherein the buffer demonstrates low quiescent power dissipation. The current mirror supplies the incremental base drive to the output transistor to support high output currents. When the output drive may source or sink the high output currents, two current mirrors may be used, one for each of the source and the sinking circuitry. This invention provides for minimal loss of dynamic range.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to bipolar high output current buffers, and more particularly to buffers with stacked input and output transistors.

2. Background Information

Prior art bipolar high current buffers typically comprise four transistors, a PNP and NPN input and a corresponding NPN and PNP output arranged in a push pull or the other stacked configuration. In this configuration, the output is limited by the output transistor beta (current gain) and the base drive available from the input stage. This leads to higher than desired quiescent power dissipation, due to high current in the input stage. FIG. 1 shows such a buffer, where an input signal (IN) is applied to the bases of Q 2 and Q 3 , and the output(OUT) is taken from the emitters of Q 1 and Q 4 . Notice that the current available to the base of Q 1 is at most I 2 , and the current available to the base of Q 4 is at most I 1 . Notice also, that the output voltage swing can come within one base emitter drop of Vcc, when high, and one base emitter drop of Vee, when low.

One prior art approach to reduce the quiescent power dissipation is to use another set of transistors to in effect increase the current gain by ananging an emitter of another transistor to drive the base of the output transistor. However, such a circuit will reduce the dynamic swing of the output by at least one additional base emitter drop near the Vee rail and another near the Vcc rail. FIG. 2 illustrates this approach. Notice that Q 5 's base drive is sourced from the emitter of Q 7 . The range, in this circuit, of available output current via Q 5 is the current source I 3 multiplied by the beta of Q 7 times the beta of Q 5 . So, large output currents are available even with a small I 3 current. Since I 3 is small, the quiescent power dissipation in the circuit is much smaller than that of FIG. 1 . However, notice that if Q 7 is fully on, Vee plus a Vbe (base emitter drop) appears at Q 7 's emitter and so at the base of Q 5 , and that the OUT is necessarily higher than Vee by the two Vbe base emitter drops (Q 5 and Q 7 ). The same is true at the Vcc end of the dynamic range where I 4 drives the base of Q 8 , and, where the OUT is at least the base emitter drops of Q 6 and Q 8 below Vcc. This limits the dynamic swing of the circuit in FIG. 2 to at least four Vbe's less than Vcc to Vee.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,574,233 to Taylor (Taylor) describes a high impedance current source using negative feed back to produce a high impedance current source that operates with small voltages (tens/hundreds of millivolts) across the current source. The circuit is shown in FIG. 3 . The output current is the collector current of Q 11 and any change is sensed across the resistor R 2 . The sensed voltage across R 2 appears across R 1 via the common base connections of Q 15 and Q 17 . The current through the collector of Q 15 changes and that in turn changes the base current to Q 11 in such way to reduce the original change (that is negative feedback). The circuit of FIG. 3 provides a high output impedance current source output that operates close to the Vee rail. Taylor also teaches that the ratio of R 2 to R 1 can fix the loop gain of the feed back loop and is selected to produce a relatively high incremental output impedance, see column 2 , line 50 .

Taylor in column 2 , lines 31 - 36 , describes how his high output impedance current source circuit of FIG. 3 can be operated as an amplifier. The input is a voltage at the collector of Q 15 and the output is taken from the collector of Q 11 . The present invention makes use of a circuit similar to that shown in FIG. 3 , but with some differences. Those differences are not shown, anticipated, taught or suggested by Taylor.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The limitations of the prior art are overcome and other advantages are provided by the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention provides a first bipolar transistor with its emitter producing the high output current. A second bipolar transistor, of the same polarity as the first, has its emitter coupled to the collector of the first transistor, and its collector coupled to a first voltage source. The base of the first transistor is coupled to the collector of a third transistor of the opposite polarity with respect to the first and second transistors. The emitter of the third transistor is coupled to a first resistor whose distal end is coupled to the first voltage source. The emitter of the third transistor is also coupled to the emitter of a fourth transistor of common polarity with the third transistor. Please note that the first resistor distal end may be connected to a second voltage source that may have a greater magnitude than the first voltage source.

Note that the term “coupled” is defined to mean “connected” or “functionally connected.” “Functionally” here refers to benign components that may be between the items “coupled.” The terms “connected” and “coupled” are used herein synonymously.

The collector of the fourth transistor is coupled to its base and to a first current source, and the base of the second transistor coupled to a resistor whose distal end is coupled to the second voltage source. The base of the second transistor is also coupled to the emitter of a fifth transistor of common polarity to the third and fourth transistors, and the collector of the fifth transistor is coupled to a second current source.

The bases of the fourth and the fifth transistors are coupled together to form a current mirror, and the base of the third transistor is coupled to the collector of the fifth transistor. The third, fourth and fifth transistors form a negative feedback loop. An incremental base drive for the first transistor to support an incremental current at the emitter of the first transistor is supplied from the collector of the third transistor.

In one preferred embodiment, the polarity of the first and second transistors are PNP, and the polarity of the third, fourth, and fifth transistors are NPN. In another embodiment, the first and second transistors are NPN, the third, fourth, and fifth transistors are PNP.

In another embodiment example, there is a sixth transistor of common polarity with the third, fourth and fifth transistors. The emitter of the sixth transistor is coupled to the base of the first transistor, its emitter is also coupled to a third current source, and the base of the sixth transistor is suitable to receive an input signal.

In another embodiment, an first NPN and a first PNP have emitters connected together forming a high current output. Another pair of a second PNP and a second NPN have base connected together forming an input. The emitters of the second pair are both connected to current sources arranged consistently with the normal current flow through each transistor type. The collectors of the second pair are coupled to power supplies of proper polarities. The emitter of the second PNP is connected to the base of the first NPN and the emitter of the second NPN is connected to the base of the first PNP. This circuit forms a basic high current buffer circuit.

A third NPN has its collector coupled to a positive power supply and its emitter coupled to the collector to the first NPN. A third PNP has its collector coupled to a negative (with respect to the positive power supply) power supply and its emitter coupled to the collector of the first PNP.

A first current mirror with a first input and a first output is arranged with both input and output arranged to sink current signals. The first input is coupled to the base of the third PNP, and the first output is coupled to the base of the first PNP. The first current mirror is arranged to work near the negative power supply. In this configuration, a change in the output signal current through the first and the third PNP's is reflected back to the first current mirror that supplies the necessary base drive to the first PNP transistor to accommodate the change in the output signal current delivered.

A second current mirror with a first input and a first output is arranged with both input and output arranged to source current signals. The first input is coupled to the base of the third NPN, and the first output is coupled to the base of the first NPN. The second current mirror is arranged to work near the positive power supply. In this configuration, a change in the output signal current through the first and the third NPN's is reflected back to the second current mirror that supplies the necessary base drive to the first NPN transistor to accommodate the change in the output signal current delivered.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that although the following Detailed Description will proceed with reference being made to illustrative embodiments, the drawings, and methods of use, the present invention is not intended to be limited to these embodiments and methods of use. Rather, the present invention is of broad scope and is intended to be defined as only set forth in the accompanying claims.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:

FIG. 1 is a prior art schematic of a high output current buffer;

FIG. 2 is another prior art high output current buffer;

FIG. 3 is a schematic of a prior art circuit that operates close to the power rails and still maintains a high output impedance;

FIG. 4 is a schematic of a circuit incorporating a form of the present invention;

FIGS. 5 and 6 are schematic details of the current mirrors of FIG. 4 ; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic of FIG. 5 with an added emitter follower buffer.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram/circuit schematic illustrating the present invention. The present invention provides a current minor approach that augments the four transistor buffer of FIG. 1 . In this way, the quiescent current and power are held low, while the current output is high and the output voltage dynamic range is relatively unrestricted. Compare to FIG. 1 . The four transistor buffers, now labeled Q 10 , Q 20 , Q 30 , and Q 40 , remain, but feedback current mirrors 40 and 60 and transistors Q 15 and Q 25 have been added. The current mirrors operate in a preferred embodiment to substantially reduce quiescent power while maintaining the dynamic range of the inventive circuit to about that of the circuit of FIG. 1 . As mentioned above, the prior art approaches, as in FIG. 2 , will reduce the OUT voltage dynamic range by at least two additional Vbe voltage drops.

As discussed below, in FIG. 4 when the OUT signal is at its extreme near Vee, Q 10 will be at or near saturation (Vce sat) and drop, in a preferred embodiment, about 40-50 mV. The collector of Q 10 will be at least the Vbe of Q 15 from Vee, to the OUT is one Vbe (Q 15 ) and one Vce (sat)(Q 10 ) higher than Vee. Similarly, at the high extreme OUT will be one Vbe (Q 25 ) and one Vce (sat) (Q 40 ) lower than Vcc. The design of the current mirrors 40 and 60 provides for V 3 and V 3 ′ to be about 60-80 mV, see below. In this embodiment the circuit of FIG. 4 will demonstrate a dynamic range that is only about 100 mV less than that of FIG. 1 . This is a substantial improvement over the prior art's reduction of 1.6V. For example, if the Vcc to Vee range was 3.3V, the rail to rail dynamic range, using the prior art circuit of FIG. 2 , would be the 3.3V minus two base emitter drops, or about 1.6V at each rail. In such a case, the full dynamic range of the prior art circuit is near zero, while using the present invention the available dynamic range would be about 1.6V.

FIG. 5 is a schematic of the mirror 40 of FIG. 4 . Note that the circuit is similar to Taylor's, however with important differences. First, the input to the circuit is IN 1 which is input to R 10 . This connection is not taught, suggested or contemplated by Taylor, and there is a compensation capacitor C 1 , also missing from Taylor, at the base of the output transistor Q 54 to provide a one pole roll off of loop gain for circuit stability. In FIG. 5 the currents through Q 50 and Q 52 mirror each other.

In FIG. 5 one preferred embodiment might have Iout 1 equal to 1 ma, IA′ equal to 1 ma, and IA equal to 2 ma. If R 10 and R 20 are each 20 ohms, the quiescent voltage drops V 1 and V 2 would each be 40 mV. The feed back operation, around the loop of Q 50 , Q 54 , to Q 52 , forces V 1 to equal V 2 . For example, if a higher current (say due to an increased load) at OUT ( FIG. 4 ) is sinked by Q 10 and Q 15 of FIG. 4 , Iin 1 item 23 into the resistor R 10 increases. The current through Q 50 of FIG. 5 is reduced, and more of IA is available to drive the base of Q 54 . This increases the collector current of Q 54 , Iout 1 item 25 , to supply more base drive to Q 10 ( FIG. 4 ) to support the increased OUT current. V 1 rises to balance V 2 via the negative feedback and a stable operating condition is achieved.

In this embodiment, V 1 is about 40 mV, and Q 54 may operate to near saturation so that V 3 may be about 60 to 80 mV.

Still referring to FIG. 4 , The quiescent current I 20 (as well as I 10 ) is now quite small since it is not an exclusive source of the base drive to Q 10 (as for Q 1 of FIG. 1 ), so the quiescent power dissipation is small. The feedback current mirror 40 , as in FIG. 5 , now will supply the base drive to Q 10 and is actively adjusted, by the feedback circuit, to supply the base drive current for Q 10 necessary to support the output current.

The circuit of FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the current mirror at the Vee end of the dynamic output range of the circuit of FIG. 4 . A corresponding current mirror 60 is illustrated in FIG. 6 for the operation at the Vcc end of the dynamic range. Operation is directly analogous to that described for FIG. 5 , and voltage drops across Q 25 and Q 40 will be about one Vbe drop plus one Vce drop.

In FIG. 6 , Iout 2 might also be set to 1 ma, IB′ to 1 ma, and IB to 2 ma. If R 30 and R 40 are each 20 ohms, the quiescent voltage drops V 30 and V 40 would both be about 40mV. The feed back operation forces V 40 to equal V 30 , for example, if a higher current (say due to an increased load at the OUT) at OUT is sourced by Q 40 and Q 25 of FIG. 4 , Iin 2 item 27 is increased. Q 60 and 062 form a current mirror, and, when Iin 2 increases the current through Q 60 of FIG. 6 is reduced, and more of IB is available to drive the base of Q 64 . This increases the collector current of Q 64 , the Iout 2 item 29 , to supply more base drive to Q 40 ( FIG. 4 ) to support the increased OUT current. V 40 rises to balance V 30 via the negative feedback and a stable operating condition is achieved. C 2 provides a one pole roll off that enhances stability.

In some preferred embodiments an additional emitter follower or comparable buffer may be added to the circuits of FIGS. 5 and 6 . FIG. 7 shows the added NPN emitter follower Q 55 and current source IA″ as it would be added to the circuit of FIG. 5 . A corresponding buffer or emitter follower may be added to the circuit of FIG. 6 for the current mirror 40 of FIG. 4 . Q 55 buffers the base of Q 54 from the current source IA, wherein any change in the amount of current source IA (due to a change of Iout 1 current) diverted to or from the base of Q 54 is reduced by the beta of Q 55 . In a preferred embodiment, this improves signal distortion within the circuits.

In these circuits described above, care must be taken that the transistors involved stay out of saturation, as will be known to those skilled in the art.

It should be understood that above-described embodiments are being presented herein as examples and that many variations and alternatives thereof are possible. Accordingly, the present invention should be viewed broadly as being defined only as set forth in the hereinafter appended claims.

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H03F3/26
  • H03F3/18
USPC · US Patent Classification
330/267330/264

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2006Apr 2006Jul 2006Oct 2006Jan 2007Apr 2007Jul 2007Oct 2007Jan 2008Apr 2008Jul 2008Oct 2008USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.6 y
945 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Robert J. Pascal
art unit 2817 · TC 2800
Citations: 11 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2014201620182020202220242026Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock