Class AB operational buffer

The present invention is related generally to an operational buffer and, more particularly, to a class AB operational buffer having high stability, low power consumption and simple bias circuit.

The operational buffer in the source driver for thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT LCD) is required to have:

(1) high slew rate such that the driving capability is strong enough to precharge the resistor-capacitor (RC) load of the LCD panel to a predetermined voltage level in a predetermined time period;

(2) low quiescent current to save power as much as possible under the condition of being able to drive the RC load of the LCD panel;

(3) low offset voltage for supplying precise driving voltage on the LCD panel for better display performance; and

(4) excellent stability when the above requirements are all satisfied since the operational buffer is always configured with negative feedback.

However, as shown in FIG. 1 , in a conventional class AB operational buffer 100 , to reduce the offset resulted from the differential input pair 102 , there must be introduced with cascade transistors M 5 and M 6 to increase the direct current (DC) gain of the first stage circuit 101 , which will also require larger Miller capacitor 104 to improve the stability of the operational buffer 100 . Also due to the insertion of the cascade transistors M 5 and M 6 , the path for current mirroring from the node 106 to the node outp is lengthened, thereby resulting in mismatched mirroring thereof, and the stability is degraded. Moreover, in the operational buffer 100 , even though the nodes 110 and outn could be biased at a same voltage, the quiescent current of the output stage 103 will be proportional to the current of the first stage circuit 101 accordingly and therefore, higher stability and less power consumption can never be achieved at same time, resulting in poor design flexibility. In addition, the parasitic capacitance seen from the currents flowing into the nodes 106 and 108 are so large that the phase thereof are significantly shifted, and the stability is decreased accordingly. Furthermore, the operational buffer 100 needs three bias voltages V 1 , V 2 and V 3 , and the bias circuit therefore (not shown in the figure) will be thus more complicated.

Therefore, it is desired a better class AB operational buffer to avoid the above disadvantages.

An object of the present invention is to provide a novel configuration for a class AB operational buffer.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a more stable class AB operational buffer.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a class AB operational buffer having high stability and low power consumption at same time.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a class AB operational buffer requiring simpler bias circuit.

According to the present invention, a class AB operational buffer comprises an output stage, a voltage supply circuit to provide a first voltage and a second voltage to drive the output stage, a first current source to provide a first current, a second current source to provide a second current in order to adjust the first voltage, a first current mirror having a first reference branch coupled with the first current and a first mirror branch coupled with the second current through the voltage supply circuit to mirror the first current to adjust the second voltage, and a second current mirror having a second branch coupled between the second current source and first mirror branch and a second mirror branch coupled between the first current source and first reference branch. The voltage supply circuit includes a PMOS transistor and an NMOS transistor coupled in parallel to be controlled by a first bias voltage and a second bias voltage, respectively.

Since there is no cascade transistor in the class AB operational buffer of the present invention, the class AB operational buffer will have higher stability and require fewer bias voltages. Further, when the first and second bias voltages have error, the first and second currents will not be influenced, and thereby preventing the output current varying with the error of the first and second bias voltages. As a result, high stability and low power consumption are obtained at same time.

These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a class AB operational buffer;

FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of an NMOS input class AB operational buffer according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of another NMOS input class AB operational buffer according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram of a PMOS input class AB operational buffer according to the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of a rail-to-rail class AB operational buffer according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of a class AB operational buffer 200 , which comprises a differential input pair including NMOS transistors T 1 and T 2 to produce currents Id 1 and Id 2 in response to input voltages Vneg and Vpos, respectively, and driving circuit 201 to drive output stage 212 in response to the currents Id 1 and Id 2 to thereby produce output voltage Vout and output current lout. In the driving circuit 201 , current sources 202 and 204 provide currents I 1 and I 2 respectively, the currents I 1 and I 2 are drained therefrom with the currents Id 1 and Id 2 such that currents 13 and 14 are left, transistors T 7 and T 8 constitute a voltage supply circuit to provide voltages Vabp and Vabn to the nodes 208 and 210 to drive the output stage 212 , transistors T 3 and T 4 constitute a current mirror for the currents 13 and 14 to be equal to one other, and transistors T 5 and T 6 constitute a current mirror such that the voltage Vabpis on the node 206 is tracking to the voltage Vabp on the node 208 . Since the operational buffer 200 does not require any cascade configuration to increase the DC gain as in the conventional one 100 , the capacitor Cm is not required to be so large to reduce the offset resulted from the differential input pair of the NMOS transistors T 1 and T 2 . In addition, the current sources 202 and 204 only see the capacitances on the drains of the corresponding transistors, without the capacitances from the gates to the sources of the corresponding transistors as in the conventional one 100 , and therefore, the phase shifts of the currents will be less and better stability is obtained accordingly. Further, there is only one transistor T 4 between the gate of the transistor T 10 and the supply voltage Vee, unlike two transistors M 4 and M 6 in the conventional operational buffer 100 , and as a result, the gate-source voltage difference Vgs of the transistor T 10 will be biased very close to the threshold voltage Vth, and the working voltages on the nodes 210 and 211 will be very close to Vgs accordingly, thereby reducing the offset resulted from the transistors T 3 and T 4 to an insignificant level. In the operational buffer 200 , when the bias voltages Vnfeed and Vpfeed have error, they will not influence the currents on the two prior branches of the transistors T 5 and T 6 , thereby preventing the output current lout from varying with the error of the bias voltages Vnfeed and Vpfeed, and thus high stability and low power consumption are obtained at same time. In the path for current mirroring from the node 206 to the node 208 , there are fewer transistors than in the conventional operational buffer 100 , the mismatch resulted from the current mirroring will be much less than the conventional one 100 and the stability of the class AB operational buffer 200 will be thus better. In the operational buffer 200 , furthermore, there requires only two bias voltages Vnfeed and Vpfeed, and the bias circuit therefor (not shown hereof will be simpler than for the conventional operational buffer 100 .

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of another class AB operational buffer 300 having a structure similar to that of the circuit 200 shown in FIG. 2 . However, to prevent the supply voltages Vcc and Vee from abnormal drops to result in the negative feedback of being disabled to further lock the output voltage Vout, the operational buffer 300 is introduced with transistors T 11 and T 12 constituting a current mirror to mirror the current Id 2 flowing through the transistor T 2 to the node 206 , and transistors T 13 and T 14 constituting a current mirror to mirror the current Id 1 flowing through the transistor T 1 to the node 208 . In addition, it is known that the swing of the voltage Vabp on the node 208 will influence the maximum level of the output current lout and overshoot. To clamp the swing of the voltage Vabp for better performance, there is introduced with transistors T 15 and T 16 to constitute clamping diodes between the supply voltage Vcc and the node 208 .

The above operational buffers 200 and 300 both are NMOS input operational buffers, i.e., the differential input pair is constructed by NMOS transistors, and such operational buffer is used in the source driver of a TFT LCD for driving positive voltage. For driving negative voltage, a PMOS input operational buffer 400 is provided in FIG. 4 . Conventionally, to transform the NMOS input operational buffer 300 of FIG. 3 to a PMOS input operational buffer, in addition to replace the NMOS transistors T 1 and T 2 in the differential input pair with PMOS transistors, the transistors T 3 and T 4 also have to be replaced with PMOS transistors. However, such replacement will slow the speed since the DC gain will be increased. To avoid this drawback, the PMOS input operational buffer 400 still employ the NMOS transistors T 3 T 4 , and is only replaced the NMOS transistors T 1 and T 2 in the differential input pair with PMOS transistors T 1 ′ and T 2 ′ for better stability.

FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of a rail-to-rail operational buffer 500 , in which the differential input pair constructed by the NMOS transistors T 1 and T 2 and the differential input pair constructed by the PMOS transistors T 1 ′ T 2 ′ use a common driving circuit 201 to drive the output stage 212 , and the driving circuit 201 also includes the current sources 202 and 204 and the transistors T 3 -T 8 as in the above embodiments. The current flowing through the transistor T 1 is mirrored by the current mirror constructed by the transistors T 13 and T 14 to the driving circuit 201 , the current flowing through the transistor T 2 is mirrored by the current mirror constructed by the transistors T 11 and T 12 to the driving circuit 201 , the current flowing through the transistor T 1 ′ is mirrored by the current mirror constructed by the transistors T 13 ′ and T 14 ′ to the driving circuit 201 , and the current flowing through the transistor T 2 ′ is mirrored by the current mirror constructed by the transistors T 11 ′ and T 12 ′ to the driving circuit 201 . Additionally, the transistors T 15 , T 16 , T 21 , T 22 and T 23 constitute a reference voltage generator to produce a reference voltage Vref close to ½ Vcc to compare with the input voltages Vneg and Vpos.

The rail-to-rail operational buffer 500 is equivalent to a combination of the NMOS input operational buffer 300 and the PMOS input operational buffer 400 , which has the advantages that the operational buffers 300 and 400 have, could save much more power due to the comparison of the input voltages Vneg and Vpos with the reference voltage Vref close to ½ Vcc, and suffers less linearity.

In a conventional rail-to-rail operational buffer, two driving circuits are provided for the differential input pair constructed by NMOS transistors and the differential input pair constructed by PMOS transistors, respectively; while the rail-to-rail operational buffer 500 uses a common driving circuit 201 , and thus has simpler circuit since it saves a driving circuit.

While the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope thereof as string forth in the appended claims.