USPatent applicationPatented

Bi-modal voltage limit control to maximize ultra-capacitor performance

Granted 17 Jun 2008 · 2 office actions

Life of the application

23 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An electrical system that is operable to selectively provide electrical power to power a load includes an ultra-capacitor that selectively stores and discharges electrical power and a control module that determines an operating ratio based an ON power state and an OFF power state of the ultra-capacitor. The control module calculates a voltage limit of the ultra-capacitor based on the operating ratio and regulates operation of the ultra-capacitor based on the voltage limit.

Description

7 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to energy storage devices, and more particularly, to achieving a targeted operating lifespan of ultra-capacitor energy storage devices.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Electric, fuel cell, and hybrid vehicles include electric drive motor(s) that selectively drive wheels of the vehicle. An energy storage device is provided to store energy that is used to power the electric drive motor(s). Energy storage devices such as ultra-capacitors may be used to provide short bursts of power that may be required during vehicle operation. For example, energy stored in an ultra-capacitor may be used for engine start and stop operation, launch assist and/or regenerative braking.

When implementing an ultra-capacitor, it is important to determine the remaining useful life of the ultra-capacitor energy storage device. FIG. 1 shows an exemplary plot of the instantaneous projected life (Y) of an ultra-capacitor cell as a function of the cell voltage (V) for varying cell temperatures (T). The exemplary plot includes Y at temperatures of 15° C., 25° C., 35° C., 45° C., 55° C. and 65° C. These plots can be expressed according to the following relationship:

Y ( V,T )=10 (aT+bV+c)   [1]

where a, b, and c are constants. When Y(T,V) is expressed in years, V in volts and T in ° C., a=−0.03333333, b=−3.33333333 and c=10.1666666666 are useful values.

While the above expression is useful in providing a snapshot of projected lifespan for a variety of specific cell conditions, it does not reflect a projected life based on the cumulative effects of history of operation, nor present time varying cell conditions. Further, neither FIG. 1 , nor the expression it represents, defines the method for limiting the ultra-capacitor voltage for the purpose of achieving a desired operating lifespan. Thus a need continues to exist for an improved means and method for optimizing the useful voltage range of an ultra-capacitor power source while achieving a desired operating lifespan over varying in-use operating intervals, especially as an energy storage device for vehicles.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention provides an electrical system that is operable to selectively provide electrical power to power a load. The electrical system includes an ultra-capacitor that selectively stores and discharges electrical power and a control module that determines an operating ratio based an ON power state and an OFF power state of the ultra-capacitor. The control module calculates a voltage limit of the ultra-capacitor based on the operating ratio and regulates operation of the ultra-capacitor based on the voltage limit.

In other features, the control module calculates the voltage limit based on a target life expectancy (Y target ) of the ultra-capacitor. The Y target is equal to one of a minimum allowed life expectancy (Y operating ) and a minimum needed life expectancy (Y idle ) based on the power states of the ultra-capacitor.

In another feature, the control module calculates a temporary ratio as a ratio between an operating time and a total time. The operating ratio is set equal to the temporary ratio if a previous value of the operating ratio is less than the temporary ratio.

In another feature, the control module calculates a temporary ratio as a ratio between an operating time and a time threshold. The operating ratio is set equal to the temporary ratio if a previous value of the operating ratio is less than the temporary ratio.

In still another feature, the electrical system further comprises a temperature sensor that is responsive to a temperature of the ultra-capacitor. The voltage limit is calculated based on the temperature.

In yet another feature, the control module determines whether a power state of the ultra-capacitor is transitioning from the ON state to the OFF state and calculates the operating ratio as a ratio between an operating time and a total time when the power state is transitioning from the ON state to the OFF state and said total time is greater than a threshold time.

Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a simplified plot of the instantaneous ultra-capacitor predicted life in years versus cell voltage in volts, with temperature in ° C. as a parameter, according to the prior art;

FIG. 2 is a simplified electrical schematic block diagram of an ultra-capacitor system according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a simplified electrical schematic block diagram of an alternative ultra-capacitor system according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a graph of projected life of the ultra-capacitor as a function of elapsed time with a 10% operating period;

FIG. 5 is a graph of projected life of the ultra-capacitor as a function of elapsed time with a 90% operating period; and

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of steps performed by the ultra-capacitor voltage limit control of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 3

The following description of the preferred embodiment is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the term module refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that execute one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality. The words “idle” or “idle state” or “idle period” or “OFF” are used interchangeably herein to indicate the state or period where no significant power is being drawn from the ultra-capacitor and the words “run” or “run-state” or “run period” or “ON” are used interchangeably to indicate that significant power is being drawn from the ultra-capacitor.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3 , simplified electrical schematic block diagrams of electrical systems 20 and 40 , respectively, are illustrated. The electrical systems 20 , 40 are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/891,474, filed on Jul. 14, 2004, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein. With particular reference to FIG. 2 , the electrical system 20 determines the projected life of an ultra-capacitor. More specifically, the electrical system 20 comprises one or more ultra-capacitors C 1 . . . Ci . . . Cn and capacitor status sensors 22 - 1 . . . 22 - i . . . 22 - n that measure the voltage Vi across each capacitor C-i and temperature Ti of each capacitor Ci.

For convenience of explanation, the arrangement is described in terms of a representative capacitor C and a representative status sensor 22 , with the subsidiary identification “i” omitted. Each status sensor 22 comprises an isolation differential amplifier and a level shifter or isolator 23 having differential voltage inputs 24 coupled across capacitor C. A level shifting amplifier or isolator 27 has an input 26 coupled to a temperature sensor 25 , which is thermally coupled to the capacitor C so as to measure the temperature thereof. The output of the isolator 23 on a lead or bus 28 and the output of the isolator 27 on a lead or bus 29 are coupled to an I/O 30 of a measuring system 32 . The I/O 30 may be an analog to digital converter (A/D) and or a digital converter or signal translator depending upon the nature of the output signals from isolators 23 , 27 .

The measuring system 32 further includes a program memory 34 , a temporary working memory (RAM) 35 , a non-volatile memory (NV-MEM) 36 , a processor (CPU) 37 and a timer 38 , coupled to each other and to the I/O 30 via a bus 31 . The ultra-capacitor voltage limit control of the present invention is executed by the processor 37 . The NV-MEM 36 is used to temporarily store intermediate values of various variables or parameters. An output bus or link 33 enables the electrical system 20 to communicate the results of its evaluation of the status of capacitors C 1 . . . Ci . . . Cn and the predicted life and/or any desired intermediate values to one or more displays, alarm functions, and/or other overall or supervisory vehicle functions. An input link 39 is provided so that power-up and power-down signals can be received from, for example, an ignition switch (not shown) or other vehicle or power source control device.

With particular reference to FIG. 3 , a block diagram of the electrical system 40 is illustrated. The electrical system 40 is analogous to the electrical system 20 of FIG. 2 . Electrical systems 20 and 40 differ in that electrical system 20 uses multiple capacitor status sensors 22 to separately measure the status of the various capacitors C 1 . . . C-n. The electrical system 40 includes a single capacitor status sensor 42 that measures the collective status of capacitors C 1 . . . C-n in series and reports the combined data to a measuring system 32 ′. The status sensor 42 is analogous to the status sensor 22 and elements 43 - 49 of the status sensor 42 are equivalent in operation to elements 23 - 39 of the status sensor 22 . The components of the measuring system 32 ′ are analogous to those of the measuring system 32 .

The discussion that follows concerning the operation of the electrical systems 20 , 40 applies to either arrangement. For convenience of explanation, it is assumed that electrical system 20 of FIG. 2 is being used and that only a single cell is being considered. Persons of skill in the art will understand based on the description herein that multiple cells may also be considered using the arrangement of the electrical system 20 , the electrical system 40 or a combination of the two.

As described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/891,474, the projected life-span (Y proj ) of the ultra-capacitor is determined according to the following equation:

Y proj =Y exp /{Σ[t s /Y ( V ( t n ), T ( t n ))]+Σ(Δ t/Y off )}  [2]

Equation 2 describes the operating conditions (i.e. terminal voltage (V) and temperature (T)) and the operating state period on the present projected life-span of the ultra-capacitor. During the operating time interval (i.e., power is ON), the state of the ultra-capacitor is desirably sampled every t s seconds and therefore the number n=1, 2, 3, . . . N of sampling intervals is a measure of the total operating time and t n is the product of n and t s .

Referring now to FIG. 4 , the projected life of an exemplary ultra-capacitor as a function of elapsed time with a 10% operating period is illustrated. A projected lifespan and instantaneous expected life are plotted against predicted life in years versus elapsed time in hours. Essentially the projected lifespan is a time weighted output of the instantaneous expected life, Y(T,V). Initially while in the idle mode, both the projected lifespan and instantaneous expected life of the ultra-capacitor is at its highest level. However, when the ultra-capacitor is switched to the operating mode the instantaneous expected life severely decreases due to higher mean operating voltage, or temperature, or both. As the ultra-capacitor switches from the idle mode to the operating mode, the projected lifespan decreases according to Equation 2. Conversely, as the ultra-capacitor switches from the operating mode to the idle mode, the projected lifespan increases according to Equation 2. The trend of sharp drop in projected life during operation and then partial recovery while in the idle mode is mitigated by the passage of time. As time continues the projected lifespan converges to the targeted design life.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 3

Referring now to FIG. 5 , the projected life of an ultra-capacitor as a function of elapsed time with 90% operating period is illustrated. The axes in this figure are similar to that of FIG. 4 . The characteristics of the instantaneous expected life vary from those associated with the 10% operating period. When the ultra-capacitor is operating 90% of the time, the instantaneous expected life for both the idle operation and the in-use operation are elevated relative to that of the relationship in FIG. 4 . The projected lifespan tracks the instantaneous expected life according to Equation 2. FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate that the same life expectancy can be reached, despite varying in-use conditions, by controlling of the instantaneous expected life as a function of the operating state and in-use operating period.

For a fixed capacitance, increasing the operating voltage range of the ultra-capacitor increases its energy storage but temporarily reduces the expected life of the device. Conversely, the maximum voltage of the ultra-capacitor can be reduced to increase the instantaneous expected life of the device. However, because the maximum voltage is reduced, the energy that is stored by the ultra-capacitor is also reduced for a system with fixed capacitance. This energy relationship may be characterized by the following equation:

w c = 1 2 * C * V 2 [ 3 ]

where w c is energy stored in Joules, C is capacitance and V is voltage. Maximum system energy needs and the system operating voltage define the minimum required capacitance and cost of the system. Because the ultra-capacitor has both operating and non-operating periods, the ultra-capacitor voltage limit control of the present invention provides an opportunity to temporarily operate at a higher voltage than would be allowed with just a continuous or single operating mode. Accordingly, the capacitance and cost of the system can be minimized. Non-operating periods at reduced voltage (i.e., increased life expectancy) can be used to mitigate the undesired effects of higher operating voltage (i.e., reduced life expectancy).

In-use operation of the ultra-capacitor varies on a per-operator basis. Therefore, it is expected that the operating period (Σt s ) and the idle period (ΣΔt) and the ratio of Σt s to ΣΔt or the cumulative sum of the two periods will vary from operator to operator. The ultra-capacitor voltage limit control of the present invention provides performance benefits by establishing a separate target life and cell voltage limit based on the operating and idle periods. Further benefits are realized by adjusting the state-related voltage limits based on the ratio of the operating period to the idle period. These performance benefits can be obtained without compromising the in-use lifespan of the system as long as an appropriate control method based on the feedback of these parameters is implemented.

The ultra-capacitor voltage limit control of the present invention provides a ratio (α) of the operating period (Σt s ) to the sum of the idle period (ΣΔt) and the operating period (Σt s ), according to the following relationship:

α=Σ t s /(Σ t s +ΣΔt )  [4]

As a result, α represents the fractional portion of operation. Therefore, the value (1−α) represents the fractional portion associated with the non-use or idle period. Using a and information on current operating conditions, an appropriate maximum set-point ultra-capacitor cell voltage limit (V limit ) can be determined. V limit is the voltage that can be tolerated if the minimum design life target of the ultra-capacitor is to be met.

Y proj can be defined as a function of a according to the following relationship:

Y proj =Y exp /{α*Y exp /Y operating +(1−α)* Y exp /Y idle }  [5]

or

Y proj =1 /{α/Y operating +(1−α)/ Y idle }  [6]

and

1 /Y proj =α/Y operating +(1−α)/ Y idle   [7]

By assuming that the independent variable is Y operating , the dependent variable is Y idle . By rearranging equation 7, the following relationships are provided:

Y idle =[(1−α)/α]* Y operating /{[Y operating /(α* Y proj )]−1  [8]

for 0<α<1; and

Y idle =Y operating =Design Life  [9]

for α=1 or α=0

Y proj is the targeted design life, Y operating is the minimum allowed life expectancy if operating for the stated fraction of time and Y idle is the minimum required life expectancy for the stated fraction of time.

The ultra-capacitor voltage limit control limits the maximum voltage of the ultra-capacitor to V limit provide a minimum Y(V,T)>Y operating during operating periods and limits the maximum voltage of the ultra-capacitor to ensure Y(V,T)>Y idle during idle periods. V limit is determined based on the following relationship:

V limit =[c+aT −log( Y target )]/− b   [10]

which is derived from equation 1, provided above. Exemplary values of the coefficients a, b and c include −0.03333333, −3.33333333 and 10.16666666, respectively. Y target is equal to Y operating during the operating period and is equal to Y idle during the idle period.

Referring now to FIG. 6 , steps performed by the ultra-capacitor voltage limit control will be described in detail. In step 600 , control increments t n by t s . In step 602 , control determines whether the power state (PS) is ON. If the PS is ON, control continues in step 604 . If the PS is not ON, control continues in step 606 . Control determines the ultra-capacitor temperature (T) in step 604 . In step 608 , control determines an ON time (t ON ) as the sum of a run time (t RUN ) and tn and a cumulative time (t ALL ) as the sum of an OFF time (t OFF ) and t ON .

In step 610 , control determines whether PS is transitioning from ON to OFF. If PS is not transitioning from ON to OFF, control continues in step 612 . If the PS is transitioning from ON to OFF, control continues in step 614 . In step 612 , control determines whether t ALL is greater than a threshold time limit (t LIM ). If t ALL is greater than t LIM , control continues in step 616 . If t ALL is not greater than t LIM , control continues in step 618 . In step 616 , control sets a temporary ratio (α TEMP ) equal to the ratio of t ON to t ALL . In step 618 , control sets α TEMP equal to the ratio between t ON and t LIM . In step 620 , control determines whether α TEMP is greater than α. If α TEMP is greater than α, control updates α in step 622 by setting α equal to α TEMP , and control continues in step 624 . If α TEMP is not greater than α, control continues in step 624 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 3 of 3

In step 614 , control sets PS equal to OFF. In step 626 , control determines whether t ALL is greater than or equal to t LIM . If t ALL is not greater than or equal to t LIM , control continues in step 630 . If t ALL is greater than or equal to t LIM , control sets a equal to the ratio of t ON to t ALL and resets t ON and t OFF in step 628 . In step 630 , control stores the run time (t RUN =t ON ), t OFF and ratio data, and sets t n equal to zero.

In step 624 , control calculates Y operating based on Y thr , α and an offset (k OFFSET ) according to the following relationship:

Y operating =αY thr +k OFFSET   [11]

k OFFSET provides a means for maintaining idle life targets and thus the cell set-point voltage within a manageable range and Y thr is the system design life. Control determines whether Y operating is greater than Y thr in step 632 . If Y operating is greater than Y thr , control continues in step 634 . If Y operating is not greater than Y thr , control continues in step 636 . In step 634 , control sets Y operating equal to Y thr and continues in step 638 . In step 636 , control determines whether Y operating is less than a minimum threshold (Y thrmin ). If Y operating is less than Y thrmin , control sets Y operating equal to Y thrmin in step 640 and continues in step 638 . If Y operating is not less than Y thrmin , control continues in step 638 .

In step 638 , control determines whether PS is ON. If PS is not ON, control continues in step 642 . If PS is ON, control continues in step 644 . In step 642 , control calculates Y idle based on α, Y operating and Y proj , in accordance with equation 8, described above and control continues in step 644 . In step 644 , control determines V lim in accordance with equation 10, described above and control ends. The electrical systems 20 , 40 are operated to limit the voltage of the ultra-capacitor to V lim to provide a minimum life greater than Y operating during operating periods and to provide a life greater than Y idle during idle periods.

In step 606 , control determines whether PS is transitioning from OFF to ON. If PS is not transitioning from OFF to ON, control ends. If PS is transitioning from OFF to ON, control sets PS equal to ON in step 646 . In step 648 , control retrieves t OFF , t RUN , α and V lim from memory. Control sets t OFF equal to the sum of t OFF and t n in step 650 . In step 652 , control sets t n equal to zero and control ends.

Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.

Claims as granted

23 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01R31/26
USPC · US Patent Classification
324/76.11324/658

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalAdvisory actionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.9 y
1,056 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Appeals
1
notices of appeal
Examiner
Vincent Q Nguyen
art unit 2858 · TC 2800
Citations: 6 back · 8 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1Owner 2liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock