A novel polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane is disclosed. The novel polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane of the present invention comprises two different compounds which are crosslinked by irradiating light such as UV or electronic beams or heat treatment to form a covalent bond between double bonds thereby providing improved properties such as chemical resistance and durability. This invention also relates to a process its preparation.

Description

11 parts

›CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority of Korean Application No. 10-2004-021736, filed Mar. 30, 2004, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

›TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a novel polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane and a process of its preparation. More specifically, this invention relates to a novel polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane wherein two different compounds are crosslinked by light irradiation such as UV or electronic beams or heat treatment to form a covalent bond between the double bonds thereby providing improved properties such as chemical resistance and durability. This invention also relates to a process its preparation.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Polyvinyl alcohols can readily form thin films having relatively high hydrophilicity and chemical resistance. Therefore, they have been widely used as various kinds of membranes such as reverse osmosis membrane, pervaporation membrane, carbon dioxide separation membrane, dehumidifying membrane, ultrafiltration membrane, precision filtration membrane, separation membrane for membrane reactor carrier for wastewater treatment, transparent hydrophilic surface coating material, blood filtration membrane not contaminated with proteins and the like. In these cases, the films are often crosslinked to increase mechanical strength and durability.

Polyvinyl alcohols can be crosslinked physically by freezing-thawing (Polymer, 1989, 30, 762], or chemically by dialdehyde (Advances in Polymer Science, 1997, 130, 1] diisocyanate (Journal of Polymer Science Part A, 1996, 925) or diacid and its substituents (Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 59, 425). The crosslinked polymers have more like a netlike structure as compared to linear polymers and are thus not easily dissolved and have been used in preparing separation membranes or biological materials with improved mechanical strength.

However, these polymers or the membranes prepared by using the polymers have a disadvantage that they are decomposed during the long-term use because they generally contain acetal, ester or urethane bonding groups which can be easily influenced by acid or water.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

After extensive researches to resolve the disadvantages of the typical polyvinyl alcohol-based polymers, the inventors of the present invention found that when crosslinkable polymers obtained by etherification of two different compounds, wherein the first compound containing a halogen or a tosyl group along with a double bond, and the second compound containing a halogen or a tosyl group along with an electrolyte-conferring group, with a hydroxyl group of polyvinyl alcohol are irradiated by light or treated with heat, there occurs a covalent bond between the double bonds thereby improving chemical resistance and durability of the polymers. Accordingly, the objective of this invention is to provide a novel polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane with improved mechanical strength such as chemical resistance and durability. Further, another objective of this invention is to provide a process of its preparation.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

In an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a polymer membrane prepared by light irradiation or heat treatment of polymers of the following formula 1.

In the above formula 1, q is an integer of 0 to 3; and R is a functional group having an electrolytic property selected from the group consisting of carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, and ethylene oxide, and is in the range of 100≦a+b+c≦100,000.

In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of preparing the polymer membrane, as shown in the following reaction scheme 1, which comprises:

(a) reacting

(i) a polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer of the following formula 2, (ii) a compound of the following formula 3 containing both a functional group such as a halogen group or a tosyl group, and (iii) a double bond at the same time, and a compound of the following formula 4 containing both a functional group such as a halogen group or a tosyl group and an electrolyte-conferring group, thereby preparing a crosslinkable polymer of the above formula 1; and

(b) coating the crosslinkable polymer of the formula 1 on a base plate and crosslinking.

wherein q is an integer of 0 to 3;

R is a functional group having an electrolytic property selected from the group consisting of carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, and ethylene oxide, and is in the range of 100≦a+b+c≦100,000 and 100≦n≦100,000; and X is a leaving group selected from the group consisting of a halogen atom, toluene sulfonate and benzylhalide.

The present invention is described in greater details hereunder.

In an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a crosslinkable polymer of the above formula 1, which is obtained by simultaneous etherification of both a compound of the above formula 3 containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with a double bond, and a compound of the above formula 3 containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with an electrolyte-conferring functional group to a hydroxy group of a polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer of the above formula 2. When the above crosslinkable polymer is coated as thin film on a certain surface after mixing with a light initiator or a heat initiator in a predetermined ratio, and then placed under irradiation of UV or electronic beams or heat treatment, there occurs an addition reaction between double bonds thereby forming a crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer of the above formula 1 having separation membrane, polymer electrolyte membrane, hydrophilic transparent surface function material, blood filtration membrane or biosurface which do not permit absorption of proteins.

The polyvinyl alcohol-based polymers that can be used in the present invention are the known polymers used in manufacturing crosslinking membranes, preferably at least one selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylacetate-vinylalcohol copolymer, polyethylene-vinylalcohol copolymer, polyvinylalcohol-(metha)acryl copolymer, polyvinylalcohol-vinylchloride copolymer and polyvinylalcohol-styrene copolymer. The above polymers are capable of selective separation of water due to their high affinity for water and thus are suitable for use as separation membrane, polymer electrolyte membrane, hydrophilic transparent surface function material, blood filtration membrane or biosurface which do not permit absorption of proteins.

Further, the introduction of the double bond of the crosslinkable polymer of the primary component and the electrolyte-conferring functional group of the secondary component to the above polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer by etherification is performed by so-called Williamson ether synthesis. In the above synthesis, a compound containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with a double bond is used as the primary component while a compound containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with an electrolyte-conferring functional group is used as the secondary component.

Examples of the above crosslinkable polymer with a double bond of the primary compound are: CH 2 ═CHCH 2 Cl, CH 2 ═CHCH 2 Br, CH 2 ═CHCH 2 I, CH 2 ═CHCH 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 2 Cl, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 2 Br, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 2 I, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , CH 3 CH═CHCH 2 Cl, CH 3 CH═CHCH 2 Br, CH 3 CH═CHCH 2 I, CH 3 CH═CHCH 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , CH 2 ═CHCH(Cl)CH 3 , CH 2 ═CHCH(Br)CH 3 , CH 2 ═CHCH(I)CH 3 , CH 2 ═CHCH(OC 6 H 4 CH 3 )CH 3 , CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 3 Cl, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 3 Br, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 3 I, CH 2 ═CH(CH 2 ) 3 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , (CH 3 ) 2 C═CHCH 2 Cl, (CH 3 ) 2 C═CHCH 2 Br, (CH 3 ) 2 C═CHCH 2 I, (CH 3 ) 2 C═CHCH 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , C 6 H 5 CH═CHCH 2 Cl, C 6 H 5 CH═CHCH 2 Br, C 6 H 5 CH═CHCH 2 I, C 6 H 5 CH═CHCH 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 , CH 2 ═CHC 6 H 4 CH 2 Cl, CH 2 ═CHC 6 H 4 CH 2 Br, CH 2 ═CHC 6 H 4 CH 2 I CH 2 ═CHC 6 H 4 CH 2 OC 6 H 4 CH 3 .

Examples of the above electrolyte-conferring functional group of the secondary component are: ClCH 2 COONa, BrCH 2 COONa, ICH 2 COONa, ClCH 2 CH 2 COONa, BrCH 2 CH 2 COONa, ICH 2 CH 2 COONa, ClCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 COOK, BrCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 COOK, ICH 2 CH 2 CH 2 COOK, ClCH 2 CH 2 SO 3 Na, BrCH 2 CH 2 SO 3 Na ICH 2 CH 2 SO 3 Na ClCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 SO 3 K, BrCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 SO 3 K, ICH 2 CH 2 CH 2 SO 3 Na, ClC 6 H 4 SO 3 Na ClC 6 H 4 N ClCH 2 C 6 H 4 SO 3 Na, ClCH 2 C 6 H 4 N, BrC 6 H 4 SO 3 Na, BrC 6 H 4 N, BrCH 2 C 6 H 4 SO 3 K BrCH 2 C 6 H 4 N.

In the present invention, the above primary component containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with a double bond is preferred to be used in the amount of about 1 to 50 mole % with reference to that of polyvinyl alcohol. If its content is less than 1 mol % there will be insufficient crosslinking. If its content exceeds 50 mole % it results in decrease in hydrophilicity.

In the present invention, the above secondary component containing a halogen group or a tosyl group along with an electrolyte-conferring functional group is preferred to be used in the amount of about 1 to 50 mole % with reference to that of polyvinyl alcohol. If its content is less than 1 mol % there will be insufficient electrolytic properties. If its content exceeds 50 mole % it cannot introduce a double bond and thus crosslinking cannot be formed.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

As stated above, this invention also relates to a method of preparing crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer membrane. The specific details are described herein below.

First, a polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer is dissolved in an organic solvent, and then added with a compound containing a base and a halogen or tosyl group along with a double bond and at the same time with a compound containing a halogen group or tosyl group and an electrolyte-conferring functional group and reacted for about 10 to about 24 minutes to prepare a mixed polymer solution.

Examples of the above base used to introduce a polymer double bond and an electrolyte-conferring functional group to a polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer via esterification are: Na, NaH, NaOH, KH, KOH, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , CH 3 SOCH 2 Na.

The above base first forms a salt by reacting with a hydroxy group of the polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer and then facilitates easy substitutions of the compound containing a halogen or tosyl group along with a double bond and a compound containing a halogen and tosyl group along with a hydrophilic functional group into the targeted sites. The above base is preferable to use about 1.0 to about 1.2 moles with reference to the primary component containing a halogen or tosyl group along with a double bond or the secondary component containing a halogen or tosyl group along with an electrolyte-conferring functional group. If the molar ratio is below 1.0 its activity is not sufficient thus leaving a considerable amount of unreacted materials. If the molar ratio exceeds 1.2 the activity of the base is no longer increased thus resulting in the waste of the base.

Examples of the above organic solvent are dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N-methyl-2-pyrolidone (NMP), dimethylformamide (DMF), hexafluoropropylene (HFP), dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and the like.

Then, thus prepared mixed polymer solution is filtered and the filtrate is precipitated and then dried to prepare a mixed polymer. The precipitation is performed by slowly adding a reacted polymer solution while stirring. The solvent should be able to easily dissolve unreacted materials while not dissolving polymer products and its examples are acetone, methylene chloride, ethyl acetate or a mixture thereof. Further, the solvent used in the precipitation is preferably used in the amount of about 1,000 to 3,000 wt % with reference to that of the filtrate. In addition, the precipitated mixed polymer is dried at about 70 to about 80° C. under vacuum for about 20 to 26 hours. Lastly, the above mixed polymer is dissolved in water to form a film and then cured by light or heat for about 10 minutes to about 24 hours.

The above mixed polymer is first mixed with a light initiator or a heat initiator in a predetermined ratio, coated on the porous support or a solid surface of glass plates, metals, polymers or ceramics to have a thin film, and then cured by irradiating with UV or electronic beams in the range of about 0.1 to 400 nm of wavelength or by heat-treatment at about 50 to 120° C. Applying light or heat on polymers induces an addition reaction between groups having double bonds and thus results in generation of water insoluble crosslinked polymers. The range of the wavelength of applying light source is important. For example, if the wavelength of the UV or electronic beam is below 0.1 nm the polymers become destroyed, whereas if the wavelength of the UV or electronic beam is above 400 nm crosslinking will not be formed. In case of crosslinking via heat treatment, if the temperature is below 50° C. it will slow the crosslinking process while if it is above 120° C. the polymers become destroyed.

Thus obtained polymer membranes become composed of ether groups as well as C—C bonds and C—H bonds which have strong chemical resistance. Therefore, they have improved mechanical properties such as durability as compared to that of the conventional crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer electrolyte membranes containing ester, carbamate, acetal groups, etc., and thus they can be used as gas separation membrane, polymer electrolyte membrane, pervaporation membrane, reverse osmosis membrane, protein separation membrane or hydrophilic transparent membrane. Besides, these separation membranes can be also prepared as flat membranes, hollow fiber membranes, complex membranes or tube membranes via a known method. This invention is explained in more detail based on the following Examples, however, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of this invention.

EXAMPLES

›Examples4

›Example 1

Eleven grams of PVA was added into a three-necked 500 mL flask equipped with a condenser and dissolved in 250 mL of anhydrous DMSO under the nitrogen atmosphere. After the above polymer was dissolved completely, NaH was slowly added thereto in the amount of 1.2 moles per 1 mole of allyl chloride and ClCH 2 COONa to be added. Then, chloro acetic acid neutralized with allyl chloride and sodium hydroxide was added 5 moles (Example 1-a), 10 moles (Example 1-b), and 20 moles (Example 1-c), respectively, with reference to 1 mole of polyvinyl alcohol. After reaction of for about 16 hours, the mixture was filtered with an injection syringe filled with cotton or a filer paper and the filtrate was precipitated by slowly adding it to a 5 L of acetone. The precipitated polymer was dried at 80° C. under vacuum for a day and then analyzed with 1 H-NMR. The result confirmed that an allyl group and an acetic acid group were added in a molar ratio.

1 H-NMR (d 6 -DMSO, δin ppm): δ5.8-6.0 (m, —CH═CH 2 ), δ5.0-5.3 (m, —CH═CH 2 ), δ4.2-4.7 (t, —OH), δ4.1-4.2 (s, —CH 2 —COOH—), δ3.5-4.0 (br, —CH 2 —CH), δ1.2-1.7 (br, —CH 2 —CH).

In the above experiment, using other kinds of bases such as Na, NaOH, KH, KOH, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , CH 3 SOCH 2 Na showed the same results. In addition, both the substitution of allyl chloride with allyl bromide, allyl iodide, allyl tosyl ether and the substitution of ClCH 2 COONa with BrCH 2 COONa, ICH 2 COONa all showed the same results as in the above experiment.

A small amount of the above prepared three different kinds of polymers were dissolved in water (5 wt %) and formed films which were respectively cured by UV irradiation for about 30 minutes or heat treatment at 100° C. The crosslinked films were respectively placed in sufficient amount of water and performed a swelling test. The results showed that the swelling degree was 50% for Example 1-a, 130% for Example 1-b and 170% for Example 1-c, respectively, thus confirming that the above crosslinking reactions were performed successfully.

Further, when the above films were placed in an acidic condition of pH 2 for more than a month the films were not decomposed at all thus suggesting that the crosslinked polymer membrane has excellent chemical resistance.

Comparative Example 1

Eleven grams of PVA was added into a three-necked 500 mL flask equipped with a condenser and dissolved in 250 mL of anhydrous DMSO under the nitrogen atmosphere. After the above polymer was dissolved completely, 5 mole % of glutalaldehyde (Comparative Example 1-a), 10 mole % of fumaric acid (Comparative Example 1-b), and 20 mole % of toluene isocyanate (Comparative Example 1-c) were added thereto. Upon completion of the mixing, the mixture was added with an acid and thus prepared polymer was dried on the glass plate kept at 80° C. for a day. The crosslinked films were respectively placed in sufficient amount of water and performed a swelling test. The results showed that the swelling degree was 470% for Comparative Example 1-a, 313% for Comparative Example 1-b and 150% for Comparative Example 1-c respectively, thus confirming that the above crosslinking reactions were performed successfully. However, when the above films were placed in an acidic condition of pH 2 for a day the films were decomposed thus showing inappropriateness to use them as polymer membranes.

Experimental Example 1

The above three different polymer membranes prepared in Example 1 were cut into a predetermined size and used in the experiments for separation membranes. Permeation tests were performed on the mixed gases of CO 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 according to the addition of an allyl group. The results are shown in the following table 1.

A separation experiment for pervaporation was performed using the above separation membranes in a mixed solution comprising ethanol, trifluoroethyl alcohol, and acetic acid along with 1,000 ppm of water at 30° C. under 10 −3 Torr and the results are shown in the following table 2.

Experiments of reverse osmosis membrane, ultrafiltration membrane, and protein filtration were performed using the above separation membranes in an aqueous solution containing 1% of NaCl, MgSO 4 , PEG 200, γ-globulin at 20° C. under 5 atm.

Anti-fogging test was performed using the above separation membranes by coating them on glass plates and under humidified condition. The results showed that permeation rate of visible lights were maintained at about 95% level and sufficient adhesiveness with the glass plates was maintained.

Functional capabilities of fuel cell membranes were performed using the above separation membranes. The results showed that the membranes maintained sufficient ion conductivity and mechanical strength as shown in the following table 5.

›Example 2

Eleven grams of PVA was added into a three-necked 500 mL flask equipped with a condenser and dissolved in 250 mL of anhydrous DMSO under the nitrogen atmosphere. After the above polymer was dissolved completely, NaH was slowly added thereto in the amount of 1.2 moles per 1 mole of vinylbenzyl chloride and chloroethane sulfonic acid to be added. Then, chloro sulfonic acid neutralized with vinylbenzyl chloride and sodium hydride was added 5 moles (Example 2-a), 10 moles (Example 2-b), and 20 moles (Example 2-c), respectively, with reference to 1 mole of polyvinyl alcohol. After reaction of for about 16 hours, the mixture was filtered with an injection syringe filled with cotton or a filer paper and the filtrate was precipitated by slowly adding it to a 5 L of acetone. The precipitated polymer was dried at 80° C. under vacuum for a day and then analyzed with 1 H-NMR. The result confirmed that vinylbenzyl group and ethane sulfonic acid group were added in a molar ratio. 1 H-NMR (d 6 -DMSO, δin ppm): δ6.6-7.2 (br, Ar—H), δ4.2-4.7 (m, —OH, Ar—CH 2 —Cl), δ3.5-4.0 (br, —CH 2 —CH(OH)—, —CH 2 —CH 2 —SO3H), δ0.7-2.2 (br, backbone)

In the above experiment, using other kinds of bases such as Na, NaOH, KH, KOH, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , CH 3 SOCH 2 Na showed the same results. In addition, both the substitution of vinylbenzyl chloride with vinylbenzyl bromide, vinylbenzyl iodide, vinylbenzyl tosyl ether and the substitution of chloroethane sulfonic acid with bromosulfonic acid and iodosulfonic acid all showed the same results as in the above experiment.

A small amount of the above prepared three different kinds of polymers were dissolved in water (5 wt %) and formed films which were respectively cured by UV irradiation for about 30 minutes or heat treatment at 100° C. The crosslinked films were respectively placed in sufficient amount of water and performed a swelling test. The results showed that the swelling degree was 30% for Example 2-a, 80% for Example 2-b and 130% for Example 2-c, respectively, thus confirming that the above crosslinking reactions were performed successfully.

Experimental Example 2

The above three different polymer membranes prepared in Example 2 were cut into a predetermined size and used in the experiments for separation membranes. Permeation tests were performed on the mixed gases of CO 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 according to the addition of a vinylbenzyl group. The results are shown in the following table 6.

›Example 3

Eleven grams of polyethylenevinyl alcohol (PEVA) was added into a three-necked 500 mL flask equipped with a condenser and dissolved in 250 mL of anhydrous DMSO under the nitrogen atmosphere. After the above polymer was dissolved completely, NaH was slowly added thereto in the amount of 1.2 moles per 1 mole of allyl chloride and ClCH 2 COONa to be added. Then, allyl chloride and ClCH 2 COONa were respectively added 5 moles (Example 3-a), 10 moles (Example 3-b), and 20 moles (Example 3-c), respectively, with reference to 1 mole of polyvinyl alcohol. After reaction of for about 16 hours, the mixture was filtered with an injection syringe filled with cotton or a filer paper and the filtrate was precipitated by slowly adding it to a 5 L of acetone. The precipitated polymer was dried at 80° C. under vacuum for a day and then analyzed with 1 H-NMR. The result confirmed that an allyl group was added in a molar ratio.

1 H-NMR (d 6 -DMSO, δin ppm): δ5.8-6.0 (m, —CH═CH 2 ), 55.0-5.3 (m, —CH═CH 2 ), δ4.2-4.7 (t, —OH), δ3.5-4.0 (br, —CH 2 —CH—), δ0.7-2.2 (br, backbone).

In the above experiment, using other kinds of bases such as Na, NaOH, KH, KOH, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , CH 3 SOCH 2 Na showed the same results. In addition, the substitution of allyl chloride with allyl bromide, allyl iodide, allyl tosyl ether showed the same results as in the above experiment.

A small amount of the above prepared three different kinds of polymers were dissolved in water (5 wt %) and formed films which were respectively cured by UV irradiation for about 30 minutes or heat treatment at 100° C. The crosslinked films were respectively placed in sufficient amount of water and performed a swelling test. The results showed that the swelling degree was 30% for Example 3-a, 70% for Example 3-b and 120% for Example 3-c, respectively, thus confirming that the above crosslinking reactions were performed successfully.

Experimental Example 3

The above three different polymer membranes prepared in Example 3 were cut into a predetermined size and used in the experiments for separation membranes. Permeation tests were performed on the mixed gases of CO 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 according to the addition of an allyl group. The results are shown in the following table 11.

›Example 4

Eleven grams of polyethylenevinyl alcohol (PEVA) was added into a three-necked 500 mL flask equipped with a condenser and dissolved in 250 mL of anhydrous DMSO under the nitrogen atmosphere. After the above polymer was dissolved completely, NaH was slowly added thereto in the amount of 1.2 moles per 1 mole of benzyl chloride to be added. Then, benzyl chloride and chlorobenzene sulfonate were respectively added 5 moles (Example 4-a), 10 moles (Example 4-b), and 20 moles (Example 4-c), respectively, with reference to 1 mole of polyvinyl alcohol. After reaction of for about 16 hours, the mixture was filtered with an injection syringe filled with cotton or a filer paper and the filtrate was precipitated by slowly adding it to a 5 L of acetone. The precipitated polymer was dried at 80° C. under vacuum for a day and then analyzed with 1 H-NMR. The result confirmed that vinylbenzyl group and benzene sulfonate group were added in a molar ratio.

1 H-NMR (d 6 -DMSO, δin ppm): δ6.6-7.2 (br, Ar—H), δ4.2-4.7 (m, —OH, Ar—CH 2 —Cl), δ3.5-4.0 (br, —CH 2 —CH(OH)—), δ0.7-2.2 (br, backbone)

In the above experiment, using other kinds of bases such as Na, NaOH, KH, KOH, Na 2 CO 3 , K 2 CO 3 , CH 3 SOCH 2 Na showed the same results. In addition, the substitution of vinylbenzyl chloride with vinylbenzyl bromide, vinylbenzyl iodide, vinylbenzyl tosyl ether showed the same results as in the above experiment.

A small amount of the above prepared three different kinds of polymers were dissolved in water (5 wt %) and formed films which were respectively cured by UV irradiation for about 30 minutes. The crosslinked films were respectively placed in sufficient amount of water and performed a swelling test. The results showed that the swelling degree was 40% for Example 4-a, 65% for Example 4-b and 110% for Example 4-c, respectively, thus confirming that the above crosslinking reactions were performed successfully.

Comparative Example 2

When the GFT membrane (Schultz Chemtech, Germany) was placed in an acidic condition of pH 2 for more than a day the film on the top portion of the complex membrane was decomposed thus suggesting that the above membrane is not suitable for use as a polymer membrane.

Experimental Example 4

The above three different polymer membranes prepared in Example 4 were cut into a predetermined size and used in the experiments for separation membranes. Permeation tests were performed on the mixed gases of CO 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 according to the addition of a vinylbenzyl group and a benzenesulfonate group. The results are shown in the following table 16.

The invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments thereof. However, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon consideration of the disclosure, may make modifications and improvements within the scope and spirit of the invention.

›Tables in the description — 20

TABLE 1 — Separation 1) PCO 2: Permeation rate of CO 2 2) αCO 2 /N 2: Selectivity of CO 2 over N 2 3) PO 2: Permeation rate of O 2 4) αO 2 /N 2:: Selectivity of O 2 over N 2

Capability	Ex. 1-a	Ex. 1-b	Ex. 1-c
PCO 2 1) (barrel)	386.24	235.12	153.64
PN 2 (barrel)	28.56	16.31	8.62
αCO 2 /N 2 2)	13.53	14.42	17.82
PO 2 3) (barrel)	89.53	68.51	42.24
αO 2 /N 2 4)	3.8	4.2	4.9

TABLE 2 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 1-a	Ex. 1-b	Ex. 1-c
Ethanol	Selectivity	549	363	975
	Permeation Rate	0.438	0.316	0.113
	(L/m 2 hr)
Trifluoroethyl	Selectivity	449	176	751
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.22	0.65	0.86
	(L/m 2 hr)
Acetic acid	Selectivity	830	927	489
	Permeation Rate	0.94	0.46	0.87
	(L/m 2 hr)
Isopropyl	Selectivity	621	135	117
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.81	0.38	0.76
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 3 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 1-a	Ex. 1-b	Ex. 1-c
NaCl	Rejection (%)	60	85	99
	Permeation Rate	0.1	0.3	0.2
	(L/m 2 hr)
MgSO 4	Rejection (%)	90	95	99
	Permeation Rate	0.05	0.13	0.12
	(L/m 2 hr)
PEG 200	Rejection (%)	95	97	99
	Permeation Rate	0.05	0.13	0.12
	(L/m 2 hr)
γ-globulin	Rejection (%)	99	99	99
	Permeation Rate	0.5	0.3	0.2
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 4

Classification	Ex. 1-a	Ex. 1-b	Ex. 1-c
Adhesive Strength	excellent	excellent	excellent
Permeation Rate of	99	97	95
Light

TABLE 5 — Membrane

	Ion Exchange		Surface Area	Tensile
	Capacity	Moisture	Resistance	Strength
Classification	(meq./g)	Content (%)	(Ω · cm 2 )	(kgf/cm 2 )
Ex. 1-a	2.14	62	1.35	161
Ex. 1-b	2.61	65	1.53	174
Ex. 1-c	3.71	669	1.33	169

TABLE 6 — Separation 1) PCO 2: Permeation rate of CO 2 2) αCO 2 /N 2: Selectivity of CO 2 over N 2 3) PO 2: Permeation rate of O 2 4) αO 2 /N 2:: Selectivity of O 2 over N 2

Capability	Ex. 2-a	Ex. 2-b	Ex. 2-c
PCO 2 1) (barrel)	401.34	250.60	150.73
PN 2 (barrel)	29.41	17.15	8.38
αCO 2 /N 2 2)	13.65	14.61	17.99
PO 2 3) (barrel)	91.33	76.14	47.68
αO 2 /N 2 4)	3.1	4.4	5.7

TABLE 7 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 2-a	Ex. 2-b	Ex. 2-c
Ethanol	Selectivity	426	630	920
	Permeation Rate	0.537	0.321	0.121
	(L/m 2 hr)
Trifluoroethyl	Selectivity	432	186	712
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.32	0.79	0.98
	(L/m 2 hr)
Acetic acid	Selectivity	823	905	488
	Permeation Rate	0.84	0.39	0.79
	(L/m 2 hr)
Isopropyl	Selectivity	756	147	121
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.71	0.30	0.63
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 8 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 2-a	Ex. 2-b	Ex. 2-c
NaCl	Rejection (%)	56	78	90
	Permeation Rate	0.1	0.2	0.3
	(L/m 2 hr)
MgSO 4	Rejection (%)	80	84	87
	Permeation Rate	0.06	0.15	0.16
	(L/m 2 hr)
PEG 200	Rejection (%)	102	98	99
	Permeation Rate	0.04	0.13	0.10
	(L/m 2 hr)
γ-globulin	Rejection (%)	95	99	100
	Permeation Rate	0.6	0.4	0.2
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 9

Classification	Ex. 2-a	Ex. 2-b	Ex. 2-c
Adhesive Strength	excellent	excellent	excellent
Transmittance of	99	98	95
Light

TABLE 10 — Membrane

	Ion Exchange		Surface Area	Tensile
	Capacity	Moisture	Resistance	Strength
Classification	(meq./g)	Content (%)	(Ω · cm 2 )	(kgf/cm 2 )
Ex. 2-a	2.14	64	1.35	166
Ex. 2-b	2.16	68	1.54	176
Ex. 2-c	3.37	68	1.31	166

TABLE 11 — Separation 1) PCO 2: Permeation rate of CO 2 2) αCO 2 /N 2: Selectivity of CO 2 over N 2 3) PO 2: Permeation rate of O 2 4) αO 2 /N 2:: Selectivity of O 2 over N 2

Capability	Ex. 3-a	Ex. 3-b	Ex. 3-c
PCO 2 1) (barrel)	351.06	220.65	110.15
PN 2 (barrel)	20.70	12.43	5.92
αCO 2 /N 2 2)	16.96	17.75	18.61
PO 2 3) (barrel)	80.41	61.44	33.49
αO 2 /N 2 4)	3.9	4.9	5.7

TABLE 12 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 3-a	Ex. 3-b	Ex. 3-c
Ethanol	Selectivity	336	518	760
	Permeation Rate	0.403	0.291	0.107
	(L/m 2 hr)
Trifluoroethyl	Selectivity	323	157	642
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.26	0.68	0.78
	(L/m 2 hr)
Acetic acid	Selectivity	623	714	312
	Permeation Rate	0.72	0.30	0.68
	(L/m 2 hr)
Isopropyl	Selectivity	635	134	110
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.67	0.23	0.53
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 13 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 3-a	Ex. 3-b	Ex. 3-c
NaCl	Rejection (%)	45	70	82
	Permeation Rate	0.07	0.15	0.24
	(L/m 2 hr)
MgSO 4	Rejection (%)	72	79	84
	Permeation Rate	0.04	0.09	0.12
	(L/m 2 hr)
PEG 200	Rejection (%)	95	82	87
	Permeation Rate	0.03	0.10	0.07
	(L/m 2 hr)
γ-globulin	Rejection (%)	96	98	99
	Permeation Rate	0.5	0.3	0.2
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 14

Classification	Ex. 3-a	Ex. 3-b	Ex. 3-c
Adhesive Strength	excellent	excellent	excellent
Transmittance of	95	96	97
Light

TABLE 15 — Membrane

	Ion Exchange	Moisture	Surface Area	Tensile
	Capacity	Content	Resistance	Strength
Classification	(meq./g)	(%)	(Ω · cm 2 )	(kgf/cm 2 )
Ex. 3-a	2.14	64	1.35	166
Ex. 3-b	2.16	68	1.54	176
Ex. 3-c	3.37	68	1.31	166

TABLE 16 — Separation 1) PCO 2: Permeation rate of CO 2 2) αCO 2 /N 2: Sel ectivity of CO 2 over N 2 3) PO 2: Permeation rate of O 2 4) αO 2 /N 2:: Selectivity of O 2 over N 2

Capability	Ex. 4-a	Ex. 4-b	Ex. 4-c
PCO 2 1) (barrel)	390.35	240.06	122.38
PN 2 (barrel)	22.05	11.63	6.12
αCO 2 /N 2 2)	17.70	20.64	20.00
PO 2 3) (barrel)	85.25	66.37	39.20
αO 2 /N 2 4)	3.9	5.7	6.4

TABLE 17 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 4-a	Ex. 4-b	Ex. 4-c
Ethanol	Selectivity	360	571	854
	Permeation Rate	0.443	0.335	0.124
	(L/m 2 hr)
Trifluoroethyl	Selectivity	333	168	654
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.32	0.73	0.83
	(L/m 2 hr)
Acetic acid	Selectivity	632	754	362
	Permeation Rate	0.78	0.35	0.69
	(L/m 2 hr)
Isopropyl	Selectivity	645	147	134
alcohol	Permeation Rate	0.71	0.47	0.63
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 18 — Separation

Classification	Capability	Ex. 4-a	Ex. 4-b	Ex. 4-c
NaCl	Rejection (%)	65	75	98
	Permeation Rate	0.09	0.25	0.34
	(L/m 2 hr)
MgSO 4	Rejection (%)	78	82	89
	Permeation Rate	0.09	0.12	0.15
	(L/m 2 hr)
PEG 200	Rejection (%)	97	88	95
	Permeation Rate	0.06	0.12	0.10
	(L/m 2 hr)
γ-globulin	Rejection (%)	97	99	99
	Permeation Rate	0.5	0.4	0.3
	(L/m 2 hr)

TABLE 19

Classification	Ex. 3-a	Ex. 3-b	Ex. 3-c
Adhesive Strength	excellent	excellent	excellent
Transmittance of	96	98	98
Light(%)

TABLE 20 — Membrane

	Ion Exchange	Moisture	Surface Area	Tensile
	Capacity	Content	Resistance	Strength
Classification	(meq./g)	(%)	(Ω · cm 2 )	(kgf/cm 2 )
Ex. 4-a	2.4	64	1.5	160
Ex. 4-b	2.6	65	1.5	174
Ex. 4-c	3.7	66	1.3	162

Claims as granted

9 claims

Classifications

15 codes

IPC · International Patent Classification

Section B — Performing operations; transporting

B01D71/82
B01D33/21
B01D39/14
B01D71/38
B01D39/00
B01D29/00
B01D67/00

Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy

C08J5/22

USPC · US Patent Classification

210/500.42428/310.5210/500.23210/490264/41210/500.34210/500.27

Claim changes

Soon

Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom

USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open

Pendency

3.6 y

1,323 days filing → grant

Office actions

non-final + final

Responses

no RCE

Examiner

Ana M Fortuna

art unit 1797 · TC 1700

Law firm

Law firm · Log in to unlock

Citations: 14 back · 11 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom

Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.