Node dependent wireless transmit antenna selection technique
Granted 7 Apr 2009 · 1 office action
Assignee: Cisco Systems
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Ming Chi Chen, Mickey Ramal Henniger · Examiner: Edward Urban · AU 2618 · TC 2600
Life of the application
8 dated eventsAbstract
A system and method for selecting a best transmit antenna for a transceiver using antenna diversity that caches the identity of the best transmit antenna for each remote node from which a message has been received. The best transmit antenna is then selected for each message sent to a remote node having a cache entry.
Description
4 parts›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Antenna diversity has long been utilized in wireless communication systems and is currently being deployed in hand-held devices such as cellular telephones.
Many RF Transmitter/receiver systems contain antenna systems which have multiple antennas. The multiple “diversity” antennas are physically separated with the intent that each antenna has a unique coverage pattern.
When an RF transmission is sent to the diversity antenna system, the RF receiver antenna control hardware dynamically determines which antenna contains the best/strongest signal and electrically connects the best antenna to the radio receiver hardware. This dynamic selection can (and usually does) occur independently on each packet/message received on the diversity antenna system.
When selecting a transmit antenna the following assumptions are made:
1. The receive coverage pattern is similar to the transmit coverage pattern for a given antenna in a multiple antenna system, and 2. Adjacent packets in time (e.g., just before or just after one another) tend to be going to or coming from the same far-end node
The transmit antenna selection algorithm for the diversity antenna system is to use the same antenna which was last selected as the best receive antenna on the most recently received RF packet/message.
However, in many cases one or both of the above-stated assumptions are not valid. In those cases existing systems could select the antenna with the weaker signal response when transmitting to a node.
Accordingly, devices that could take advantage of the availability of multiple antennas during transmission would provide substantial improvement in device performance.
›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one embodiment of the invention, the antenna which was used to receive a packet for each node is remembered and then later when sending a packet to that same node, the same antenna that was used to receive the packet from that node is used to transmit a packet to that node.
In another embodiment of the invention, the best antenna for each node is determined by messages from a remote node to the transceiver indicating the signal quality of received messages from the transceiver.
In another embodiment of the invention, best antenna indications for each node from which a message is received are cached. Cache entries are refreshed after a timeout period.
In another embodiment of the invention, the timeout period for remote nodes that do not change best antennas for a set period of time have their timeout periods extended.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent in view of the following detailed description and appended figures.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a transceiver having two antennas used for antenna diversity;
FIGS. 2-4 are flowcharts depicting the operation of embodiments of the invention.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the invention. Examples of these embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to any embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. However, the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
Various embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 1 which depicts a wireless transceiver 10 having first and second antennas 12 and 14 , a controller 16 , and a memory 18 . More than two antennas can be utilized but are not necessary to describe the operation of the embodiments.
As described above, the controller executes code or includes hardware to measure the received signal strength at both antennas of a signal being transmitted by a particular node and selects the antenna having highest received signal strength.
In the following embodiments the above listed assumptions are addressed and therefore do not need to be made. These embodiments allow a per-node selection of the best antenna for a given remote node. This means the best diversity transmit antenna is used more often than in previous systems and results in better signal strength and quality in the local-node transmit path.
A first embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the flow charts of FIGS. 2 and 3 .
Referring to FIG. 2 , the best transmit antenna is determined during the first communication with a given node is determined and periodically thereafter when receive signal strength quality measurements are made as the local station transmits on each of the antennas. The best transmit antenna for this particular node is then stored in a local database/cache.
When a packet/message is to be transmitted to any given node, the local database/cache is referenced to determine the best transmit antenna to use for the particular node to which the packet is destined. Thus, for each packet the node is determined and the best transmit antenna is selected.
The cached elements can optionally be aged. As depicted in FIG. 3 , if the timeout period has expired a new assessment of the best transmit antenna is made, thereby refreshing the cache entry.
If a given node usually refreshes to the same antenna, then the timeout age on the cache entry can be extended. In this way, static (non-moving) nodes will spend less and less time determining which antenna to use. Conversely, if the “best” antenna changes often, then the cache element age timeout should be decreased.
A second embodiment will now be described with reference to FIG. 4 . This embodiment is similar to the first embodiment, except that the remote node remembers the signal strength and quality of its last received packet/message and sends that to the local unit on the next remote-node-to-local-node packet/message, as part of the control information/header.
In this way, the local node can continuously monitor received signal strength and the quality of remote nodes' reception of frames sent by the local node.
When signal strength/quality drops below identified thresholds, re-evaluation of the best antenna to use can happen immediately.
In a third embodiment, the assumption is made that the transmit and receiver coverage for a given antenna and a given receiver are effectively the same.
This means that the local node's receive signal strength and quality of messages received from a remote node are assumed to be the same signal strength and quality of the messages received by the remote node.
In this embodiment, on the receipt of any message, the best receive diversity antenna used to receive the packet is held in a database entry for that node.
The next transmission to that node references the database to determine the best receive antenna for that node, and therefore assumes it is also the best transmit antenna to use.
The invention has now been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Alternatives and substitutions will now be apparent to persons of skill in the art. Accordingly, it is not intended to limit the invention except as provided by the appended claims.
Claims as granted
9 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
4 codes- H04M1/00
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock