High reliability triple redundant latch with voting logic on each storage node
Granted 20 Feb 2007 · 1 office action
Current assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. · originally Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Manuel Cabanas-Holmen, Jonathan P Lotz, Daniel W. Krueger · Examiner: Calvin Lee · AU 2818 · TC 2800
Life of the application
7 dated eventsAbstract
In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a circuit and method for a high reliability triple redundant latch. Three settable memory elements set an identical logical value into each settable memory element. After the settable memory elements are set, three voting structures with inputs from the first, second, and third settable memory elements and control to the settable memory elements determine the logical values held on the settable memory elements. The propagation delay through a latch is the only propagation delay of the triple redundant latch.
Description
10 parts›CROSS-REFERENCED RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a divisional of the application Ser. No. 10/856,557 titled “High Reliability Triple Redundant Latch with Voting Logic on each Storage Node”, filed on May 27, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,937,527.
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to latch design. More particularly, this invention relates to improving soft error immunity in latches.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
High-energy neutrons lose energy in materials mainly through collisions with silicon nuclei that lead to a chain of secondary reactions. These reactions deposit a dense track of electron-hole pairs as they pass through a p-n junction. Some of the deposited charge will recombine, and some will be collected at the junction contacts. When a particle strikes a sensitive region of a latch, the charge that accumulates could exceed the minimum charge that is needed to “flip” the value stored on the latch, resulting in a soft error.
The smallest charge that results in a soft error is called the critical charge of the latch. The rate at which soft errors occur (SER) is typically expressed in terms of failures in time (FIT).
A common source of soft errors are alpha particles which may be emitted by trace amounts of radioactive isotopes present in packing materials of integrated circuits. “Bump” material used in flip-chip packaging techniques has also been identified as a possible source of alpha particles.
Other sources of soft errors include high-energy cosmic rays and solar particles. High-energy cosmic rays and solar particles react with the upper atmosphere generating high-energy protons and neutrons that shower to the earth. Neutrons can be particularly troublesome as they can penetrate most man-made construction (a neutron can easily pass through five feet of concrete). This effect varies with both latitude and altitude. In London, the effect is two times worse than on the equator. In Denver, Colo. with its mile-high altitude, the effect is three times worse than at sea-level San Francisco. In a commercial airplane, the effect can be 100–800 times worse than at sea-level.
Radiation induced soft errors are becoming one of the main contributors to failure rates in microprocessors and other complex ICs (integrated circuits). Several approaches have been suggested to reduce this type of failure. Adding ECC (Error Correction Code) or parity in data paths approaches this problem from an architectural level. Adding ECC or parity in data paths can be complex and costly.
At the circuit level, SER may be reduced by increasing the ratio of capacitance created by oxides to the capacitance created by p/n junctions. The capacitance in a latch, among other types, includes capacitance created by p/n junctions and capacitance created by oxides. Since electron/holes pairs are created as high-energy neutrons pass through a p/n junction, a reduction in the area of p/n junctions in a latch typically decreases the SER. Significant numbers of electron/hole pairs are not created when high-energy neutrons pass through oxides. As a result, the SER may typically be reduced by increasing the ratio of oxide capacitance to p/n junction capacitance in a SRAM cell.
There is a need in the art to reduce the SER in latches. An embodiment of this invention reduces the SER in triple redundant latches while adding only a small increase in physical size of the triple redunant latch and deducing the delay time through a triple redundant latch.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a circuit and method for a high reliability triple redundant latch. Three settable memory elements set an identical logical value into each settable memory element. After the settable memory elements are set, three voting structures with inputs from the first, second, and third settable memory elements and control to the settable memory elements determine the logical values held on the settable memory elements. The propagation delay through a latch is the only propagation delay of the triple redundant latch.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic of a triple redundant latch. Prior Art
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an improved triple redundant latch.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an improved triple redundant latch.
FIG. 4 is a schematic of an improved triple redundant latch.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 1 of 5
FIG. 1 is a schematic of a triple redundant latch. The input, 100 , to the triple redundant latch is connected to the input of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 . Control signal, 102 , is connected to transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 . Control signal, 102 , controls when the signal on the input of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 is transferred to the outputs, 104 , 106 , and 108 of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 respectively. The signal presented to outputs, 104 , 106 , and 108 , is stored in LATCH 1 , LATCH 2 , and LATCH 3 respectively.
After control signal, 102 , is turned off, the signal on LATCH 1 drives the input of inverter, INV 1 . After control signal, 102 , is turned off, the signal on LATCH 2 drives the input of inverter, INV 2 . After control signal, 102 , is turned off, the signal on LATCH 3 drives the input of inverter, INV 3 . The output, 110 , of inverter, INV 1 , drives an input to AND 1 and an input to AND 2 . The output, 112 , of inverter, INV 2 , drives an input to AND 1 and an input to AND 3 . The output, 114 , of inverter, INV 3 , drives an input to AND 2 and an input to AND 3 . The output, 116 , of AND 1 drives an input of OR 1 . The output, 118 , of AND 2 drives an input of OR 1 . The output, 120 , of AND 3 drives an input of OR 1 . The output of the triple redundant latch is the output, 122 of OR 1 .
A triple redundant latch reduces soft errors by storing the same data in three different latches. For example, when the control signal, 102 is on, a logical high value may be driven from the inputs, 100 , of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 to the outputs, 104 , 106 , and 108 , of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 respectively. After turning control signal 102 off, a logical high value is stored in latches, LATCH 1 , LATCH 2 , and LATCH 3 . The stored logical high value on LATCH 1 drives the input of inverter, INV 1 , and produces a logical low value on the output, 110 , of inverter, INV 1 . The stored logical high value on LATCH 2 drives the input of inverter, INV 2 , and produces a logical low value on the output, 112 , of inverter, INV 2 . The stored logical high value on LATCH 3 drives the input of inverter, INV 3 , and produces a logical low value on the output, 114 , of inverter, INV 3 .
Since the output, 110 , 112 , and 114 of inverters, INV 1 , INV 2 , and INV 3 , respectively, are low, all the inputs, 110 , 112 , and 114 to AND 1 , AND 2 , and AND 3 respectively are a logical low value. Since all the inputs, 110 , 112 , and 114 , to AND 1 , AND 2 , and AND 3 respectively are a logical low value, the output, 116 , 118 , and 120 of AND 1 , AND 2 , and AND 3 respectively are a logical low value. Since the output, 116 , 118 , and 120 of AND 1 , AND 2 , and AND 3 , respectively are a logical low value, all the inputs of OR 1 are a logical low value. Since all the inputs, 116 , 118 , and 120 to OR 1 are logical low value, the output, 122 , is logical low value.
If a soft error occurs, for example, in LATCH 2 , and changes the stored logical value from a logical high value to a logical low value, a logical low value is now presented to the input, 106 , of inverter, INV 2 . The output, 112 , of inverter, INV 2 , presents a logical high value to an input of AND 1 and AND 3 . Since, in this example, the other input, 110 to AND 1 and the other input, 114 , to AND 3 , is a logical low value, the output, 116 and 120 of AND 1 and AND 3 respectively remains a logical low value and the output, 122 , does not change. This example illustrates how a single soft error in one latch does not change the original stored value in a triple redundant latch.
As a further example, assume, in addition to the soft error in LATCH 2 , there is an additional soft error in LATCH 3 . Now, the input, 108 , to inverter, INV 3 , is a logical low value and as a result, the output, 114 , of inverter, INV 3 , is a logical high value. A logical high value in now presented to an input, 114 , of AND 2 , and to an input, 114 , of AND 3 . Since a logical low and logical high value are presented on the inputs of AND 1 , the output, 116 of AND 1 is still a logical low value. Since a logical low and logical high value are presented on the inputs of AND 2 , the output, 118 of AND 2 is still a logical low value. However, since inputs, 112 and 114 , to AND 3 are a logical high value, the output, 120 , is a logical high value. Since input, 120 , to OR 1 is a logical high value, the output, 122 , changes from a logical low value to a logical high value. This example illustrates how soft errors in two latches of a triple redundant latch do change the original stored value of the triple redundant latch.
A triple redundant latch prevents a single soft error from changing the original value stored in the latch. However, this comes at the cost of additional circuitry which results in a physically larger latch. In addition, a triple redundant may introduce time delay in the delay path of the latch. As consequence, a triple redundant latch is usually larger and slower than a single latch.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an improved triple redundant latch. In this embodiment, an identical logical value, 210 , is set into settable memory element 1 , SME 1 , settable memory element 2 , SME 2 , and settable memory element, SME 3 , by controlling signal 204 . After an identical logical value, 210 , is set into settable memory element 1 , SME 1 , settable memory element 2 , SME 2 , and settable memory element, SME 3 , by controlling signal 204 , the identical logical value is held in the three settable memory elements, SME 1 , SME 2 , and SME 3 . The voting structures, VS 1 , VS 2 , and VS 3 , after an identical logical value, 210 , is set into settable memory element 1 , SME 1 , settable memory element 2 , SME 2 , and settable memory element SME 3 , determine the logical values presented on the outputs, 214 , 216 , and 218 of voting structures VS 1 , VS 2 , and VS 3 respectively, based on the logical values on nodes, 206 , 208 , 212 , and control signal, 204 .
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 2 of 5
If the logical value, 210 , stored in the settable memory element 1 , SME 1 , is disturbed by a soft error event, and the other two settable memory elements, SME 2 and SME 3 , are not disturbed by a soft error event, the voting structure 1 , VS 1 , will restore the original logical value stored in the settable memory element 1 , SME 1 . If the logical value, 210 , stored in the settable memory element 2 , SME 2 , is disturbed by a soft error event, and the other two settable memory elements, SME 1 and SME 3 , are not disturbed by a soft error event, the voting structure 2 , VS 2 , will restore the original logical value stored in the settable memory element 2 , SME 2 . If the logical value, 210 , stored in the settable memory element 3 , SME 3 , is disturbed by a soft error event, and the other two settable memory elements, SME 1 and SME 2 , are not disturbed by a soft error event, the voting structure 3 , VS 3 , will restore the original logical value stored in the settable memory element 3 , SME 3 .
If the logical value stored in settable memory element one, SME 1 , is disturbed by a soft error event, the voting structure 3 , VS 3 , will tri-state its output, 218 , leaving the original logical value stored in settable memory element 3 , SME 3 and the voting structure 2 , VS 2 , will tri-state its output, 216 , leaving the original logical value stored in settable memory element 2 , SME 2 . If the logical value stored in settable memory element two, SME 2 , is disturbed by a soft error event, the voting structure 3 , VS 3 , will tri-state its output, 218 , leaving the original logical value stored in settable memory element 3 , SME 3 , and the voting structure 1 , VS 1 , will tri-state its output, 214 , leaving the original logical value stored in settable memory element 1 , SME 1 . If the two settable memory elements, SME 1 and SME 2 , are disturbed by a soft error event at nearly the same time, the logical value original stored in the triple redundant latch may fail.
The propagation delay through the triple redundant latch shown in FIG. 2 is determined only by the propagation delay of settable memory element, SME 3 . This embodiment of the invention significantly improves the delay time of a triple redundant latch. The delay time through the prior art shown in FIG. 1 , for example, includes the propagation delay through the slowest latch among latches LATCH 1 , LATCH 2 , and LATCH 3 , the propagation delay through an inverter, INV 2 , the propagation delay through an AND gate, AND 2 , and the propagation delay through an OR gate, OR 1 .
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a triple redundant latch with improved delay and higher reliability. The input of the triple redundant latch shown in this example is connected to the inputs, 302 , of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 . In addition, a tristatable input inverter, a cross-coupled NAND gate, and a cross-coupled NOR gate may used in place of a transfer gate. If the control signals, 304 and 306 , are on, the signal at the input, 302 , of transfer gates, TG 1 , TG 2 , and TG 3 , is transferred to the output, 308 , of transfer gate, TG 1 , the output, 310 , of transfer gate, TG 3 , and the output, 312 of transfer gate, TG 2 . The logical value presented on the output, 308 , of transfer gate TG 1 , is also an input to latch 1 , L 1 . The logical value presented on the output, 312 , of transfer gate TG 2 , is also an input to latch 2 , L 2 . The logical value presented on the output, 310 , of transfer gate TG 3 , is also connected to the input, 310 , of the latch 3 , L 3 .
The output, 314 , of latch 1 , L 1 , is connected to an input, 314 , of the voting structure, VS 3 and to an input, 314 , of the voting structure, VS 2 . The output, 316 , of latch 2 , L 2 , is connected to an input, 316 , of the voting structure, VS 3 and to an input, 316 , of the voting structure, VS 1 . The output, 318 , of latch 3 , L 3 , is connected to an input, 318 , of the voting structure, VS 1 and to an input, 318 , of the voting structure, VS 2 .
As an example of how redundancy applies for this embodiment, assume that a logical high value is stored. Storage nodes 308 , 310 , and 312 each have a logical high value stored in this example. The output, 314 , of latch 1 , L 1 , provides a logical low value to inputs of voting structure 2 , VS 2 , and voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The output, 316 , of latch 2 , L 2 , provides a logical low value to inputs of voting structure 1 , VS 1 , and voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The control signals, 304 and 306 , provide a logical low value and a logical high value respectively to two inputs of all three voting structures, VS 1 , VS 2 , and VS 3 . As a result of the logical values presented to voting structure 3 , VS 3 , the output, 310 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , is driven high to match the logical high value stored on latch 3 , L 3 .
If, in this example, a soft error event changes the logical value stored on latch 1 , L 1 , from a logical high value to a logical low value, the logical value stored on the latch 3 , L 3 , will retain its logical high value because the output, 310 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , is tri-stated, while the latch 3 , L 3 , maintains the original logical value. As a result, the triple redundant latch retains the original logical value stored on it despite a single soft error. In addition, voting structure 1 , VS 1 , will restore the original logical high value stored in latch 1 , L 1 , restoring the triple redundant latch to its original undisturbed state.
If, in this example, a soft error event changes the logical value stored on latch 1 , L 2 , from a logical high value to a logical low value, the logical value stored on the latch 3 , L 3 , will retain its logical high value because the output, 310 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , is tri-stated, while the latch 3 , L 3 , maintains the original logical value. As a result, the triple redundant latch retains the original logical value stored on it despite a single soft error. In addition, voting structure 2 , VS 2 , will restore the original logical high value stored in latch 2 , L 2 , restoring the triple redundant latch to its original undisturbed state.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 3 of 5
If in this example a soft error event changes the logical value stored on latch 3 , L 3 , from a logical high value to a logical low, voting structure 3 , VS 3 , will drive input, 310 , of latch 3 , L 3 , back to a logical high value. As a result, the triple redundant latch retains the original logical value stored on it despite a single soft error.
If, however, in this example, a soft error event changes the values stored on nodes 308 and 312 , at nearly the same time, the triple redundant latch may change from its original value. If a soft error event changes the logical values stored on nodes 308 and 312 , from logical high values to a logical low values, the inputs, 314 and 316 , to voting structure 3 , VS 3 , change from logical low values to logical high values. As a result of having logical high values on the inputs, 314 and 316 , the output, 310 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , is a logical low value. As a result, the logical value stored on node 310 is changed from the original logical high value to a logical low value. In this example, the original value stored in the triple redundant latch is changed from a logical high value to a logical low value.
In addition to improving the soft error rate of a latch, the triple redundant latch shown in FIG. 3 also reduces the delay time through a triple redundant latch because the number of logic delays is reduced. The triple redundant latch restores the original stored logical values of all three settable memory elements after a soft error event, assuming that only one settable memory element was affected.
FIG. 4 is a schematic of an improved triple redundant latch. FIG. 4 contains the same basic blocks that FIG. 3 contains; transfer gate 1 , TG 1 , transfer gate 2 , TG 2 , transfer gate 3 , TG 3 , latch 1 , L 1 , latch 2 , L 2 , latch 3 , L 3 , voting structure 1 , VS 1 , voting structure 2 , VS 2 , and voting structure 3 , VS 3 .
An embodiment of a transfer gate 1 , TG 1 , for the triple redundant latch contains a PFET, MP 2 and an NFET MN 2 . In this embodiment, the drains of PFET, MP 2 , and NFET, MN 2 , are connected to the input, 402 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 . The sources of PFET, MP 2 , and NFET, MN 2 , are connected to the output, 408 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 . The gate of PFET, MP 2 , is connected to the control input, 406 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 . The gate of NFET, MN 2 , is connected to the control input, 404 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 .
An embodiment of a transfer gate 2 , TG 2 , for the triple redundant latch contains a PFET, MP 4 and an NFET MN 4 . In this embodiment, the drains of PFET, MP 4 , and NFET, MN 4 , are connected to the input, 402 , of transfer gate 2 , TG 2 . The sources of PFET, MP 4 , and NFET, MN 4 , are connected to the output, 412 , of transfer gate 2 , TG 2 . The gate of PFET, MP 4 , is connected to the control input, 406 , of transfer gate 2 , TG 2 . The gate of NFET, MN 4 , is connected to the control input, 404 , of transfer gate 2 , TG 2 .
An embodiment of a transfer gate 3 , TG 3 , for the triple redundant latch contains a PFET, MP 3 and an NFET MN 3 . In this embodiment, the drains of PFET, MP 3 , and NFET, MN 3 , are connected to the input, 402 , of transfer gate 3 , TG 3 . The sources of PFET, MP 3 , and NFET, MN 3 , are connected to the output, 416 , of transfer gate 3 , TG 3 . The gate of PFET, MP 3 , is connected to the control input, 406 , of transfer gate 3 , TG 3 . The gate of NFET, MN 3 , is connected to the control input, 404 , of transfer gate 3 , TG 3 .
An embodiment of latch 1 , L 1 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 5 , NFET, MN 5 , PFET, MP 6 , and NFET, MN 6 . In this embodiment, the gate of PFET, MP 5 , and the gate of NFET, MN 5 , is connected to the drain of PFET, MP 6 and to the drain of NFET, MN 6 , the input, 408 , of latch 1 , L 1 . The drain of PFET, MP 5 , and the drain of NFET, MN 5 , is connected to the gate of PFET, MP 6 and to the gate of NFET, MN 6 , the output, 410 , of latch 1 , L 1 . The sources of PFET, MP 5 and PFET, MP 6 are connected to VDD. The sources of NFET, MN 5 , and NFET, MN 6 are connected to GND.
An embodiment of latch 2 , L 2 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 7 , NFET, MN 7 , PFET, MP 8 , and NFET, MN 8 . In this embodiment, the gate of PFET, MP 7 , and the gate of NFET, MN 7 , is connected to the drain of PFET, MP 8 and to the drain of NFET, MN 8 , the input, 412 , of latch 2 , L 2 . The drain of PFET, MP 7 , and the drain of NFET, MN 7 , is connected to the gate of PFET, MP 8 and to the gate of NFET, MN 8 , the output, 414 , of latch 2 , L 2 . The sources of PFET, MP 7 and PFET, MP 8 are connected to VDD. The sources of NFET, MN 7 , and NFET, MN 8 are connected to GND.
An embodiment of latch 3 , L 3 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 9 , NFET, MN 9 , PFET, MP 10 , and NFET, MN 10 . In this embodiment, the gate of PFET, MP 9 , and the gate of NFET, MN 9 , is connected to the drain of PFET, MP 10 and to the drain of NFET, MN 10 , the input, 416 , of latch 3 , L 3 . The drain of PFET, MP 9 , and the drain of NFET, MN 9 , is connected to the gate of PFET, MP 10 and to the gate of NFET, MN 10 , the output, 418 , of latch 3 , L 3 . The sources of PFET, MP 9 and PFET, MP 10 are connected to VDD. The sources of NFET, MN 9 , and NFET, MN 10 are connected to GND.
An embodiment of voting structure 1 , VS 1 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 11 , PFET, MP 12 , PFET, MP 13 , NFET, MN 11 , NFET, MN 12 , and NFET, MN 13 . In this embodiment, the gates of PFET, MP 1 , and NFET, MN 11 , are connected to the first input, 414 , of voting structure 1 , VS 1 . The gates of PFET, MP 12 , and NFET, MN 12 , are connected to the second input, 418 , of the voting structure 1 , VS 1 . The gate of PFET, MP 13 , is connected to the third input, 404 , of the voting structure 1 , VS 1 . The gate of NFET, MN 13 , is connected to the fourth input, 406 , of the voting structure 1 , VS 1 . The source of PFET, MP 11 , is connected to VDD. The source of NFET, MN 11 , is connected to GND. The drain, 420 , of PFET, MP 11 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 12 , 420 . The drain, 422 , of PFET, MP 12 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 13 , 422 . The drain of PFET, MP 13 is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 13 , and the input, 408 , of the latch 1 , L 1 . The source, 424 , of NFET, MN 13 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 12 , 424 . The source, 426 , of NFET, MN 12 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 11 , 426 .
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 4 of 5
An embodiment of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 14 , PFET, MP 15 , PFET, MP 16 , NFET, MN 16 , NFET, MN 15 , and NFET, MN 14 . In this embodiment, the gates of PFET, MP 14 , and NFET, MN 14 , are connected to the first input, 414 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The gates of PFET, MP 15 , and NFET, MN 15 , are connected to the second input, 410 , of the voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The gate of PFET, MP 16 , is connected to the third input, 404 , of the voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The gate of NFET, MN 16 , is connected to the fourth input, 406 , of the voting structure 3 , VS 3 . The source of PFET, MP 14 , is connected to VDD. The source of NFET, MN 14 , is connected to GND. The drain, 428 , of PFET, MP 14 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 15 , 428 . The drain, 430 , of PFET, MP 15 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 16 , 430 . The drain of PFET, MP 16 is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 16 , and to the input, 416 , of the latch 3 , L 3 . The source, 432 , of NFET, MN 16 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 15 , 432 . The source, 434 , of NFET, MN 15 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 14 , 434 .
An embodiment of voting structure 2 , VS 2 , for the triple redundant latch contains PFET, MP 17 , PFET, MP 18 , PFET, MP 19 , NFET, MN 19 , NFET, MN 18 , and NFET, MN 17 . In this embodiment, the gates of PFET, MP 17 , and NFET, MN 17 , are connected to the first input, 410 , of voting structure 2 , VS 2 . The gates of PFET, MP 18 , and NFET, MN 18 , are connected to the second input, 418 , of the voting structure 2 , VS 2 . The gate of PFET, MP 19 , is connected to the third input, 404 , of the voting structure 2 , VS 2 . The gate of NFET, MN 19 , is connected to the fourth input, 406 , of the voting structure 2 , VS 2 . The source of PFET, MP 17 , is connected to VDD. The source of NFET, MN 17 , is connected to GND. The drain, 436 , of PFET, MP 17 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 18 , 436 . The drain, 438 , of PFET, MP 18 , is connected to the source of PFET, MP 19 , 438 . The drain of PFET, MP 19 is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 19 , and to the input, 412 , of the latch 2 , L 2 . The source, 440 , of NFET, MN 19 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 18 , 440 . The source, 442 , of NFET, MN 18 , is connected to the drain of NFET, MN 17 , 442 .
FIG. 4 is a schematic of an improved triple redundant latch. An input signal drives the inputs, 402 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 , transfer gate 2 , TG 2 , and transfer gate 3 , TG 3 . If control signal, 404 is a logical high value and control signal, 406 , is a logical low value, the signal at the input, 402 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 , transfer gate 2 , TG 2 , and transfer gate 3 , TG 3 is transferred to the output, 408 , of transfer gate 1 , TG 1 , the output, 412 , of transfer gate 2 , TG 2 , and the output, 416 , of transfer gate 3 , TG 3 .
The signal transferred to nodes 408 , 416 , and 412 is also presented to the input, 408 , of latch 1 , L 1 , the input, 412 , of latch 2 , L 2 , and the input 416 , of latch 3 , L 3 . Latches L 1 , L 2 , and L 3 store the same logical value. The outputs, 410 , 414 , and 418 , of latches, L 1 , L 2 and L 3 respectively, output the opposite sense of the logical value stored. The outputs, 410 , 414 and 418 , of latches, L 1 , L 2 , and L 3 respectively, along with the first, 404 , and second, 406 , control signals are inputs to voting structures, VS 1 , VS 2 , and VS 3 . The inputs, 404 , 406 , 414 , and 418 , into voting structure 1 , VS 1 , cause the output, 408 , of voting structure 1 , VS 1 , to reinforce the signal presented at the input, 408 , of latch 1 , L 1 , when the transfer gates are off. The inputs, 404 , 406 , 410 , and 418 , into voting structure 2 , VS 2 , cause the output, 412 , of voting structure 2 , VS 2 , to reinforce the signal presented at the input, 412 , of latch 2 , L 2 , when the transfer gates are off. The inputs, 404 , 406 , 414 , and 410 , into voting structure 3 , VS 3 , cause the output, 416 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , to reinforce the signal presented at the input, 416 , of latch 3 , L 3 , when the transfer gates are off.
After control input, 404 , is driven to a logical low value, and control input, 406 , is driven to a logical high value, latch 1 , L 1 , latch 2 , L 2 , and latch 3 , L 3 store the original logical value presented on nodes 408 , 412 , and 416 , respectively. If none of the nodes, 408 , 412 , and 416 , is disturbed, then a signal of the same sense is presented on the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch.
For example, if a logical high value is stored on nodes 408 , 412 , and 416 , then a logical high value is presented on the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch. A logical low value on the output, 410 , of latch 1 , L 1 , is applied to the second input of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . A logical low value on the output, 414 , of latch 2 , L 2 , is applied to the first input of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . Since in this example, the transfer gates are turned off, control signal 404 , is low and control signal 406 , is high. Because control signal 404 is low, a logical low value is applied to the third input of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . Because control signal 406 is high, a logical high value is applied to the fourth input of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . With these logical values applied to voting structure 3 , VS 3 , the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch, remains a high logical value.
If in this example where a logical high value is stored on nodes, 408 , 412 , and 416 , node 408 is changed to a logical low value by a soft error event, a logical high value is then presented to input, 410 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 . Inputs, 414 , and 404 , remain a logical low value while input 406 remains a logical high value. Since input, 410 , has changed from a low logical value to a high logical value, node 416 , is no longer actively driven high by voting structure 3 , VS 3 . However, since latch 3 , L 3 has not been disturbed, latch 3 , L 3 , actively holds node 416 at a logical high value. As a consequence, despite latch 1 , L 1 , being disturbed by a soft error event to a logical low value, the value on the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch remains a logical high value and the original logical value stored in latch 1 , L 1 , is restored by voting structure 1 , VS 1 .
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 5 of 5
If a single soft error event temporally changes the logical value stored in latch 3 , L 3 , voting structure 3 , VS 3 , will restore the logical value on latch 3 , L 3 , to its original value. The logical state on latch 3 , L 3 , is restored to its original value because none of the inputs, 404 , 406 , 410 , and 414 , into voting structure 3 , VS 3 , has changed as a consequence of latch 3 , L 3 , changing its logical value. Therefore, the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch, is driven back to its original value.
If, however, a soft error event changes the value stored on node, 408 and node, 412 , at nearly the same time, the triple redundant latch will change from its original value. For example, if a logical high value is stored on nodes 408 , 412 , and 416 , a logical high value is presented on the output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch. If a soft error event changes the logical value stored on nodes, 408 and 412 , from a logical high value to a logical low value, inputs, 410 and 414 , into voting structure 3 , V 3 , change from logical low values to logical high values. Since inputs, 410 and 414 , of voting structure 3 , VS 3 , are a logical high value, and control signal, 406 , remains a logical high value, the output, 416 , is pulled to a logical low value. The high logical value stored on latch 3 , L 3 , is then flipped to a logical low value. The output, 416 , of the triple redundant latch, is then changed from a logical high value to a logical low value.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and other modifications and variations may be possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the appended claims be construed to include other alternative embodiments of the invention except insofar as limited by the prior art.
Claims as granted
7 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
7 codes- G11C29/00
- G11C7/00
- H03K3/037
- H03K19/23
- H01L21/82
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
No assignments have been recorded for this application yet.